Open Access

High expression of TMEM40 contributes to progressive features of tongue squamous cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Qingyan Zhang
    • Danhui Huang
    • Zhenfei Zhang
    • Yuzhen Feng
    • Meiting Fu
    • Min Wei
    • Jueyu Zhou
    • Yuanjin Huang
    • Shuguang Liu
    • Rong Shi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 12, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6788
  • Pages: 154-164
  • Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Transmembrane protein 40 (TMEM40) is a 23‑kDa protein and its association with tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the expression and clinical significance of TMEM40 in TSCC and its roles in TSCC cells. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to detect the expression levels of TMEM40 in 60 tongue tissue samples. Furthermore, TMEM40 was overexpressed and inhibited in two TSCC cell lines by transfection with pEZ‑M98‑TMEM40 plasmid or TMEM40 small interfering RNA, respectively. Cell Counting Kit‑8 and colony formation assays were used to investigate the effects of TMEM40 on cell proliferation and colony formation ability, respectively. Flow cytometry was performed to determine cell apoptosis and cycle conditions of transfected cells. Wound‑healing and Transwell assays were processed to explore the effects of TMEM40 on cell migration and invasion, respectively. The results indicated that TMEM40 expression levels were significantly increased in TSCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tongue tissues (P<0.01). Clinicopathological analysis revealed that TMEM40 expression was positively correlated with pathological TNM (pTNM) status (P<0.05), histological grade (P<0.001) and clinical stage (P<0.01), but not with sex or age. Results of cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion assays indicated that when TMEM40 had been successfully overexpressed or knocked down in CAL27 and SCC9 TSCC cell lines, cell growth and invasion increased in the TMEM40 overexpressing cells, while they decreased in TMEM40‑knockdown cells. Furthermore, experiments revealed that TMEM40 knockdown resulted in increased levels of p53 and Bax, and decreased levels of MMP‑9, which indicated that TMEM40 regulated cell apoptosis and migration via involvement of p53, Bax and MMP‑9 in TSCC cells. Our findings indicated that increased expression of TMEM40 contributed to progressive features of TSCC via regulation of p53, Bax and MMP‑9.

Introduction

Tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) is the most prevalent malignancy of the head and neck and accounts for ~90% of oropharyngeal and oral malignancies (1). Over 300,000 new cases and over 100,000 deaths from oral cavity cancer are estimated to occur worldwide every year (2). Epidemiological studies revealed that smoking, alcohol use, smokeless tobacco use and HPV infection are important risk factors for TSCC (3). Increasingly, it is acknowledged that TSCC arises from genetic and epigenetic mutations (4). TSCC therapy mainly focuses on surgery, combined with radio- or chemotherapy. The 5-year survival rate for patients with TSCC is ~60% after arduous treatment (5). However, traditional therapies can cause an impact on the functions of surrounding organs, leading to eating, drinking, chewing and swallowing difficulties (6). Recently, targeted cancer therapy has developed rapidly. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors have shown initial success in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and treatments include monoclonal antibodies, which proves the necessity of identifying and defining diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers (7).

The transmembrane protein 40 (TMEM40) gene encodes a protein of 233 amino acids and is located on chromosome 3p25.2. Little is known about the functions of TMEM40. A study has indicated that TMEM40 expression is associated with the damage of the parietal lobule (8). A previous study has suggested that TMEM40 is overexpressed in bladder cancer and described the association between TMEM40 and clinical parameters of bladder cancer tissues. The present study aims to assess the functions of TMEM40 in TSCC. We demonstrated that TMEM40 was upregulated in tumor cells of clinical TSCC tissue samples and we evaluated the association of TMEM40 with clinical characteristics. Moreover, to explore the functions of TMEM40 in TSCC cells, we evaluated the effects of TMEM40 overexpression and TMEM40 knockdown on the progression of TSCC cells in vitro. These results indicated that TMEM40 served an important role in TSCC cell proliferation and migration and represented a potential oncogene.

Materials and methods

Tissue collection

A total of 50 TSCC and 10 cancer-adjacent normal tongue tissues were collected at the Stomatology Hospital of Southern Medical University (China) between January 2013 and December 2015. Patients did not receive any treatment and had no history of other malignancies prior to tumor surgery. Recorded clinicopathological parameters included sex, age, pTNM status, histology grade and clinical stage. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University. All patients provided written informed consent.

Immunohistochemical analysis

All tissue samples were examined for TMEM40 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stain and a phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Firstly, a tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed according to a standard method. Then, the TMA block was cut into 5-µm sections for IHC analysis. It was processed based on standard procedures (9). Tissues were dehydrated and incubated with 5% normal goat serum for blocking. Subsequently, tissues were incubated with TMEM40 primary antibody (mouse monoclonal; dilution 1:200; cat. no. sc-393601; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody [dilution 1:5,000; cat. no. 70-GAR007; Hangzhou MultiSciences (Lianke) Biotech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China]. Sections were visualized using a DAB Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) Color Development kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Two independent investigators determined the staining score by multiplying the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, based on clinicopathological parameters, was used to obtain the optimal cut-off score. If the TMEM40 score was below the cut-off score, tissue was defined as TMEM40 negative; otherwise it was TMEM40 positive.

Cell culture

Human tongue cell lines CAL27 and SCC9 were purchased from the China Center for Typical Culture Collection (CCTCC; Wuhan, China). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone Laboratories; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin and cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

Plasmid DNA and siRNA transfection

Plasmid DNA was transfected to evaluate TMEM40 overexpression. The TMEM40 sequence and negative control were synthesized and cloned into a pEZ-M98 vector (Guangzhou Fulengen Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). According to the manufacturer's protocol, the pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid or empty pEZ-M98 vector were used to transfect CAL27 and SCC9 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and cultured in 6-well plates. siRNAs were used to knockdown TMEM40 expression. siRNAs targeting TMEM40 and a negative control (NC) were purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). The specific siRNA sequences were as follows: TMEM40-siRNA-1, 5′-GGATGAGCTTCAACTCTAT-3′; TMEM40-siRNA-2, 5′-GTGGAGGCCTCTCAGTTAA-3′; NC, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′. Total RNAs were isolated 48 h after transfection to detect TMEM40 mRNA expression levels.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

To quantify TMEM40 mRNA expression, total RNAs were isolated from the cells 48 h after transfection. Total RNAs were extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol and dissolved into nuclease-free water. A PrimeScript® RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) was used for RT of mRNA to cDNA. Then, qPCR was performed to detect TMEM40 expression levels using the SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and an ABI 7500 real-time PCR amplifier (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 34 sec. The following primers were used: TMEM40 forward, 5′-CAGAGCAACCGGAAAACATCG-3′ and reverse, 5′-CTGGGCTACACTGAGCACC-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGTGGTCGTTGAGGGCAATG-3′. Each reaction was analyzed in triplicate. The comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCq) (10) method was used to calculate the relative levels of TMEM40.

Western blotting

To detect TMEM40 protein expression, total proteins were extracted from cells 72 h after transfection. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing 1 mM PMSF (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used. Protein concentrations were determined using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Protein samples were mixed with loading buffer [4:1 (v/v); Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology] and were boiled for 10 min. Samples were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) with a wet-transfer machine (Trans-blot SD; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h and incubated with TMEM40 primary antibody (mouse monoclonal; 1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and β-actin primary antibody (mouse monoclonal; 1:2,000; ProteinTech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) at 4°C overnight. The membrane was washed with 1X TBST (3X) and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse IgG; 1:5,000; NeoBioscience, Shenzhen, China) at room temperature for 2 h, followed by washing with 1X TBST (3×). Immunoreactive bands were visualized with the SmartChemi610 (Beijing Sage Creation Science Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) using the Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (EMD Millipore).

Cell viability assay

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was used to assess cell viability. A total of 1,000-2,000 transfected cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 3 days. At the indicated time-point, 10 µl of the CCK-8 stock solution was added to each well together with 100 µl medium and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The absorbance value (optical density) was measured at 450 nm using a multifunctional microplate reader (Tecan Infinite M200; Tecan Group Ltd., Mannedorf, Switzerland). All experiments were performed in triplicate and five duplicate wells were screened.

Colony formation assay

A total of 2 ml complete medium containing 2,000 transfected cells was added to 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 10 days. After discarding the supernatant, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (3X), fixed using 500 µl of methanol at room temperature for 20 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) for 20 min. The colony formation efficacy was determined. Assays were performed in triplicate.

Evaluation of cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry

Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the cell apoptosis ratio of the transfected cells. Harvested cells were double-labeled with Annexin V-FITC and PI apoptosis detection kits (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.) and a BD FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used for the detection of apoptosis. For cell cycle measurements, transfected cells were harvested, digested with 0.05% trypsin and fixed with 70% ethanol at −20°C overnight. Cells were stained with 0.1 mg/ml propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, USA) for 30 min. A FACSVerse flow cytometer was used to measure the intensities of the fluorescence signals. A minimum of 20,000 cells was observed for each sample. Percentages of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases were evaluated using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Wound-healing assay

A wound-healing assay was performed to assess cell migration. When cells reached a density of 80–90% after transfection, a 10-µl pipette tip was used to inflict a straight wound. PBS was used to rinse the cell debris from the dishes and serum free medium was added for cell culturing. Scrape lines were based on the border of the majority of migratory cells and photographed using a phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-S; Nikon Corp.) at different time-points (0, 12, 24 and 48 h). The scratch area and wound-healing percentage were calculated using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The experiment was repeated in triplicate and we selected the simultaneous groups.

Cell invasion assay

Cell invasion assays were performed using Transwell chambers (8-µm pore size; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) in 24-well plates. Transwell chambers were coated with 30 µl Matrigel (Corning Inc.) and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Transfected CAL27 and SCC9 cells were counted and 1×105 cells/chamber were seeded in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium. The lower well was filled with 800 µl complete medium. After 36 h of culturing at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator, the cells in the upper layer were removed with a swab. The cells on the bottom of the Transwell chamber were fixed with methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd.). The results were photographed at five randomized visual fields and experiments were repeated three times.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were completed using the SPSS 20.0 software. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ROC was adopted to select an optimal cut-off score for TMEM40 positive. A t-test was used to evaluate differences in expression between two groups. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey's post hoc test was used to analyze the CCK-8 assay data. A Chi-square test was used to assess the association between the IHC staining score and the clinicopathological parameters of TSCC. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.

Results

TMEM40 expression in tissue samples of TSCC and its association with clinicopathological parameters

To investigate the protein expression level of TMEM40 in TSCC tissues, IHC was performed in 50 TSCC and 10 cancer-adjacent normal tongue tissue sections, which were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Four representative samples of different levels of TMEM40 IHC staining are shown in Fig. 1. As shown in Table I, TMEM40 was observed in 44.0% (22/50) of the TSCC specimens and 0.00% (0/10) of the normal tongue tissues. The results indicated that TMEM40 expression was significantly increased in tumor tissues compared with the normal tongue tissues (χ2=2.756; P=0.008; Table I).

Table I.

Association of TMEM40 expression with normal tongue and TSCC tissues.

Table I.

Association of TMEM40 expression with normal tongue and TSCC tissues.

TMEM40 staining

All cases (%)Negative expression (%)Positive expression (%) P-valuea
Squamous cell carcinoma5028 (56.0)22 (44.0)0.008
Normal tongue tissues1010 (100.0)0 (0.0)

a P-values were obtained using Chi-square test. TMEM40, transmembrane protein 40; TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

The results of the association analysis between clinicopathological characteristics and TMEM40 protein expression levels in 50 patients with TSCC are summarized in Table II. The results indicated that high TMEM40 expression levels were correlated with pTNM status (χ2=4.884; P=0.027), histological grade (χ2=17.949; P<0.001) and clinical stage (χ2=10.189; P=0.006). However, there was no association between TMEM40 expression levels and sex or age.

Table II.

Association of TMEM40 expression and clinicopathological features in TSCC tissues.

Table II.

Association of TMEM40 expression and clinicopathological features in TSCC tissues.

TMEM40 staining

VariablesNegative (%)Positive (%)Total P-valueb
Sex 0.755
  Male241337
  Female14923
Age (years) 0.464
  ≤53.3a211031
  >53.3171229
pT Status 0.027
  T115 (75.0)5 (25.0)20
  T2-T413 (43.3)17 (56.7)30
Grade <0.001
  128 (71.8)11 (28.2)39
  20 (0.0)6 (100.0)6
  30 (0.0)5 (100.0)5
Stage 0.006
  I16 (76.2)5 (23.8)21
  II12 (50.0)12 (50.0)24
  III0 (0.0)5 (100.0)5

a Mean age.

b P-values were obtained using Chi-square test. TMEM40, transmembrane protein 40; TSCC, tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

Specific plasmid vectors and siRNA upregulate and silence TMEM40 expression, respectively

TSCC cell lines CAL27 and SCC9 were cultured and transfected with pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid or empty pEZ-M98 vector, or siRNA or negative control. The results revealed that 40% of the transfected pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid or empty pEZ-M98 vector cells died with the transfection experiment while no cells died with transfection of siRNA or the negative control. The expression level of TMEM40 was analyzed by RT-qPCR and amplification efficiency by qPCR was estimated at 98–100% for all samples. The results revealed that the relative mRNA expression levels of TMEM40 in plasmid-transfected cells were significantly upregulated and in siRNA-transfected cells were significantly downregulated (Fig. 2A; P<0.05; P<0.01). As shown in Fig. 2A, the RT-qPCR results revealed that both TMEM40 siRNAs (TMEM40-siRNA-1 and TMEM40-siRNA-2) efficiently silenced TMEM40 expression in CAL27 and SCC9 cells. TMEM40-siRNA-1, which exhibited a more pronounced inhibitory effect, was selected for the following experiments. Western blot analysis was performed to detect the protein expression levels of TMEM40, which revealed consistent results (Fig. 2B).

Role of TMEM40 in TSCC cell proliferation

To explore the influence of TMEM40 on the growth of TSCC cells, CCK-8 assays were applied to determine the cell viability of CAL27 and SCC9 cells. The pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid-transfected cells increased significantly in cell viability compared with the negative control group (Fig. 3A). In contrast, TMEM40-siRNA suppressed the growth of CAL27 and SCC9 cells (Fig. 3A). The results indicated that TMEM40 induced cell proliferation in TSCC cells.

Effects of TMEM40 on colony formation abilities of TSCC cells

The role of TMEM40 in the regulation of colony formation in TSCC cells was investigated. CAL27 and SCC9 cells transfected with pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid indicated a significant higher colony-forming efficacy compared with the control group, which was transfected with empty pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid. Low expression of TMEM40 suppressed colony formation abilities of cells transfected with TMEM40-siRNA (Fig. 3B and C; P<0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001). The data demonstrated that TMEM40 promoted colony formation.

Effects of TMEM40 on TSCC apoptosis and cell cycle

The influence of TMEM40 on TSCC apoptosis and cell cycle was assessed using flow cytometric assays. CAL27 and SCC9 cells were transfected with pEZ-M98-TMEM40 plasmid or empty pEZ-M98 vector and the early and late cell apoptosis ratios were observed (Fig. 4A). We calculated the total apoptosis and the results revealed that apoptosis in TMEM40-overexpressing cells was inhibited, while apoptosis in TMEM40-siRNA cells was increased (Fig. 4C; P<0.01; P<0.001). These results indicated that TMEM40 inhibited cell apoptosis in TSCC. In addition, cell cycle analysis was performed to investigate the influence of TMEM40 on TSCC cell growth (Fig. 4B). The results revealed that overexpression of TMEM40 decreased the population of the CAL27 and SCC9 cells in the G0/G1 phase and increased S-phase cells while silencing of TMEM40 increased the population of the G0/G1 phase and decreased the S phase (Fig. 4D; P<0.01; P<0.001). With the G2/M phase a consistent conclusion was not able to be reached. The results indicated that high expression of TMEM40 promoted proliferation and low expression of TMEM40 induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase.

Effects of TMEM40 on cell migration and invasion

Cell migration was detected in TSCC cells using wound-healing assays. We performed a scratch wound-healing assay in TMEM40-overexpressing and silenced CAL27 and SCC9 cells. As expected, cell migration activities of TSCC cells transfected with pEZ-M98-TMEM40 were significantly increased compared with the control cells transfected with empty pEZ-M98 vector. Silencing of TMEM40 significantly inhibited cell mobility compared with the control cells (Fig. 5A and B; P<0.01; P<0.001). Transwell assays were processed to determine further effects of TMEM40 on TSCC cells. The results revealed that high expression of TMEM40 significantly increased cell invasion in CAL27 and SCC9 compared with the control cells transfected with empty pEZ-M98 vector. In contrast, the inhibition of TMEM40 revealed a marked suppressive effect on cell invasion in CAL27 and SCC9 compared with the negative control (Fig. 6A and B; P<0.01; P<0.001). These findings indicated that TMEM40 promoted cell migration and invasion of TSCC.

Signaling pathway of TMEM40 in TSCC

To explore the changes on a molecular level of TMEM40 regulation of TSCC cell apoptosis and invasion, we detected alterations of tumor suppressor p53, apoptosis-associated protein Bax and invasion-associated protein MMP-9 by RT-qPCR. Knockdown of TMEM40 increased the expression levels of p53, activated Bax and decreased the levels of MMP-9 in CAL27 and SCC9 cells. These molecular changes indicated that TMEM40 knockdown enhanced apoptosis and reduced the invasion of TSCC cells involved with p53, Bax and MMP-9 (Fig. 6C; P<0.05; P<0.01; P<0.001).

Discussion

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histological type of oral cavity cancer and was found to be more aggressive than other malignancies (11). Although there are various advanced treatment options, recurrence rates are high. Local or regional relapse and cervical lymph node metastasis are threats to patients (12). Therefore, studies have been performed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of TSCC pathogenesis and explore potential biological markers of TSCC.

Genetic and epigenetic alterations associated with TSCC cause changes in proteins (13). The identification of squamous cell carcinoma-associated genes is essential for TSCC diagnosis and treatment. The genes that are critically altered in TSCC include p53 (14), epidermal growth factor receptor (15), cyclin D1 (16), retinoblastoma (17), vascular endothelial growth factor receiver (18), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (19), as well as other molecules. Notably, we found that TMEM40 was highly expressed in TSCC tissues compared with normal control tissues, indicating a potential role in TSCC proliferation.

The TMEM40 gene is located on chromosome 3 and alterations of chromosome 3 are closely associated with various cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (20). Very little is known about the possible functions of TMEM40 in tumors. A previous study found that TMEM40 was highly expressed in bladder cancer and associated with clinicopathological parameters. In the present study, in order to explore the clinical value of TMEM40 in TSCC, a TMA was constructed, containing 50 TSCC and 10 normal tongue tissues, which were stained with TMEM40-specific dyes. And ROC analysis was employed to determine the optimal cut-off score. The results indicated that TMEM40 was frequently overexpressed in TSCC tissues and indicated that overexpression of TMEM40 may promote tumor cell growth in TSCC. To verify the functions of TMEM40, we examined the expression status of TMEM40, assessed its association with clinicopathological features in TSCC tissues and determined the biological significance in TSCC cell lines. The results implied that large tumor size, high histological grade and high clinical stage were associated with increased TMEM40 expression levels. Moreover, CCK-8, colony formation assays, wound healing assays and Transwell assays were performed to evaluate the role of TMEM40 in TSCC cells and cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were evaluated by flow cytometry. The results revealed that downregulation of TMEM40 expression suppressed cell proliferation, colony formation ability, migration and invasion and promoted apoptosis in CAL27 and SCC9 cells. In contrast, overexpression of TMEM40 increased cell proliferation, colony formation ability, migration and invasion and inhibited apoptosis.

Collectively, we found that TMEM40 expression was increased in TSCC tissues and associated with clinicopathological parameters. TMEM40 promoted proliferation, colony formation ability, cell migration and invasion in TSCC cells. These results indicated that TMEM40 contributed to the progressive features of TSCC. However, the signaling pathways of TMEM40 remain unknown and require further investigation. A previous study found that silencing of TMEM40 increased the expression levels of p53, p21, activated caspase-3, caspase-9 and PRAP and decreased the expression levels of c-MYC and cyclin D1 in bladder cancer cells, which revealed that TMEM40 could promote bladder cancer development and progression via the p53 signaling pathway (21). The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a transcription factor that regulates several cellular stress responses, such as the control of the cell cycle, apoptosis, cell metabolism and differentiation (22). We further investigated the levels of tumor gene p53 and apoptosis-associated protein Bax by RT-qPCR. Our results revealed that knockdown of TMEM40 increased the levels of p53 and activated Bax. Bax is activated by coordinating to cytosolic p53 to initiate cell stress signaling and to induce a direct apoptotic response (23). This indicated that TMEM40 suppressed apoptosis of TSCC cells via p53- and Bax-associated pathways. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of enzymes that can destroy the extracellular matrix and are connected with tumor invasion and metastasis. MMP-9 is one of most important MMPs and it has been ascertained that MMP-9 can degrade and destroy the extracellular matrix and basement membranes of tumor cells, and accelerates generation of new blood capillaries, tumor migration and invasion (24). Low levels of MMP-9 were determined in TMEM40-silenced TSCC cells indicating that MMP-9 is involved in a molecular mechanism by which TMEM40 affects cell invasion ability. In conclusion, our findings indicated that TMEM40 promoted TSCC development and progression via regulation of p53, Bax and MMP-9. However, further in-depth research will be required to verify these findings and complete the signaling pathway information.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81672588 and 81372154), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (no. 2013B021800146) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China (no. 2014A030313293).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

RS, YH and SL conceived, designed the study and drafted the manuscript. QZ conducted the experiments and drafted the manuscript. DH and ZZ carried out the statistical analysis and the acquisition of the data. YF and MF assisted with the manuscript preparation and the data analysis. MW and JZ provided technical guidance and contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the patients signed informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

TSCC

tongue squamous cell carcinoma

TMEM40

transmembrane protein 40

pTNM

pathological TNM

H&E

hematoxylin-eosin

IHC

immuohistochemistry

TMA

tissue microarray

DMEM/F12

Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12

FBS

fetal bovine serum

NC

negative control

qRT-PCR

quantitative real-time PCR

PVDF

polyvinylidene fluoride

CCK-8

Cell Counting Kit-8

ROC

receiver operating characteristic

siRNA

small interfering RNA

Bax

Bcl-2 associated X protein

MMP-9

matrix metallopeptidase 9

References

1 

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D and Bray F: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 136:E359–E386. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 65:87–108. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hashibe M, Brennan P, Chuang SC, Boccia S, Castellsague X, Chen C, Curado MP, Dal Maso L, Daudt AW, Fabianova E, et al: Interaction between tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of head and neck cancer: Pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 18:541–550. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Tan DS, Wang W, Leong HS, Sew PH, Lau DP, Chong FT, Krisna SS, Lim TK and Iyer NG: Tongue carcinoma infrequently harbor common actionable genetic alterations. BMC Cancer. 14:6792014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Feng Z, Xu QS, Qin LZ, Li H and Han Z: Predicting radiotherapy necessity in tongue cancer using lymph Node Yield. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 75:1062–1070. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Epstein JB, Thariat J, Bensadoun RJ, Barasch A, Murphy BA, Kolnick L, Popplewell L and Maghami E: Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy: From cancer treatment to survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:400–422. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Sacco AG and Cohen EE: Current treatment options for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 33:3305–3313. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Milanesi E, Bonvicini C, Alberici A, Pilotto A, Cattane N, Premi E, Gazzina S, Archetti S, Gasparotti R, Cancelli V, et al: Molecular signature of disease onset in Granulin mutation carriers: A gene expression analysis study. Neurobiol Aging. 34:1837–1845. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Zhou H, Shi R, Wei M, Zheng WL, Zhou JY and Ma WL: The expression and clinical significance of HERC4 in breast cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 13:1132013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Dissanayaka WL, Pitiyage G, Kumarasiri PV, Liyanage RL, Dias KD and Tilakaratne WM: Clinical and histopathologic parameters in survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 113:518–525. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Lin CS, de Oliveira SA, Silva EL, de Matos LL, Moyses RA, Kulcsar MA, Pinto FR, Brandão LG and Cernea CR: Tumor volume as an independent predictive factor of worse survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 39:960–964. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Dumache R, Rogobete AF, Andreescu N and Puiu M: Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers of molecular alterations in oral carcinogenesis. Clin Lab. 61:1373–1381. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Jo DW, Kim YK and Yun PY: The influence of p53 mutation status on the anti-cancer effect of cisplatin in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 42:337–344. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Gao J, Ulekleiv CH and Halstensen TS: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor-ligand based molecular staging predicts prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma partly due to deregulated EGF-induced amphiregulin expression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 35:1512016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ramos-Garcia P, Gil-Montoya JA, Scully C, Ayén A, González-Ruiz L, Navarro-Triviño FJ and González-Moles MA: An update on the implications of Cyclin D1 in oral carcinogenesis. Oral Dis. 23:897–912. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Murali A, Varghese BT, Kumar RR and Kannan S: Combination of genetic variants in cyclin D1 and retinoblastoma genes predict clinical outcome in oral cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 37:3609–3617. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Li YF, Hsiao YH, Lai YH, Chen YC, Chen YJ, Chou JL, Chan MW, Lin YH, Tsou YA, Tsai MH and Tai CK: DNA methylation profiles and biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Epigenetics. 10:229–236. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gkouveris I, Nikitakis N, Karanikou M, Rassidakis G and Sklavounou A: JNK1/2 expression and modulation of STAT3 signaling in oral cancer. Oncol Lett. 12:699–706. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Brauswetter D, Danos K, Gurbi B, Félegyházi ÉF, Birtalan E, Meggyesházi N, Krenács T, Tamás L and Peták I: Copy number gain of PIK3CA and MET is associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 468:579–587. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Zhang ZF, Zhang HR, Zhang QY, Lai SY, Feng YZ, Zhou Y, Zheng SR, Shi R and Zhou JY: High expression of TMEM40 is associated with the malignant behavior and tumorigenesis in bladder cancer. J Transl Med. 16:92018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Duplan E, Giaime E, Viotti J, Sévalle J, Corti O, Brice A, Ariga H, Qi L, Checler F and Alves da Costa C: ER-stress-associated functional link between Parkin and DJ-1 via a transcriptional cascade involving the tumor suppressor p53 and the spliced X-box binding protein XBP-1. J Cell Sci. 126:2124–2133. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Follis AV, Llambi F, Merritt P, Chipuk JE, Green DR and Kriwacki RW: Pin1-induced proline isomerization in cytosolic p53 mediates BAX activation and apoptosis. Mol Cell. 59:677–684. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Gu L, Zhang J, Shi M, Zhan Q, Shen B and Peng C: lncRNA MEG3 had anti-cancer effects to suppress pancreatic cancer activity. Biomed Pharmacother. 89:1269–1276. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2019
Volume 41 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang Q, Huang D, Zhang Z, Feng Y, Fu M, Wei M, Zhou J, Huang Y, Liu S, Shi R, Shi R, et al: High expression of TMEM40 contributes to progressive features of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 41: 154-164, 2019
APA
Zhang, Q., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., Fu, M., Wei, M. ... Shi, R. (2019). High expression of TMEM40 contributes to progressive features of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology Reports, 41, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6788
MLA
Zhang, Q., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., Fu, M., Wei, M., Zhou, J., Huang, Y., Liu, S., Shi, R."High expression of TMEM40 contributes to progressive features of tongue squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Reports 41.1 (2019): 154-164.
Chicago
Zhang, Q., Huang, D., Zhang, Z., Feng, Y., Fu, M., Wei, M., Zhou, J., Huang, Y., Liu, S., Shi, R."High expression of TMEM40 contributes to progressive features of tongue squamous cell carcinoma". Oncology Reports 41, no. 1 (2019): 154-164. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2018.6788