Formation of size‑controllable spheroids using gingiva‑derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests

  • Authors:
    • Sung‑Il Lee
    • Seong‑Il Yeo
    • Bo‑Bae Kim
    • Youngkyung Ko
    • Jun‑Beom Park
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 5, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.539
  • Pages: 97-101
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cells have previously been isolated and characterized from the gingiva, and gingiva‑derived stem cells have been applied for tissue engineering purposes. The present study was performed to generate size‑controllable stem cell spheroids using concave microwells. Gingiva‑derived stem cells were isolated, and the stem cells of 1x105 (group A) or 2x105 (group B) cells were seeded in polydimethylsiloxane‑based, concave micromolds with 600 µm diameters. The morphology of the microspheres was viewed under an inverted microscope, and the changes in the diameter and cell viability were analyzed. The gingiva‑derived stem cells formed spheroids in the concave microwells. The diameters of the spheroids were larger in group A compared to group B. No significant changes in shape or diameter were noted with increases in incubation time. Cell viability was higher in group B at each time point when compared with group A. Within the limits of the study, the size‑controllable stem cell spheroids could be generated from gingival cells using microwells. The shape of the spheroids and their viability were clearly maintained during the experimental periods.

Introduction

Interest in stem cell research is increasing as mesenchymal stem cells provide an advantageous alternative therapeutic option for tissue regeneration (1,2). The fates of stem cells, including survival, self-renewal and differentiation, are regulated by chemical and mechanical stimuli presented in their three-dimensional microenvironment (3). The majority of stem cell studies have been performed on two-dimensional substrates (3). Conventional stem cell culture methods do not enable the control of the microenvironment (4). A previous study used poly(ethylene glycol) microwells to produce easily retrievable cell aggregates with high viability and controlled sizes and shapes defined by the geometry of the microwells (5). Other materials, including polydimethylsiloxane and polyurethane, have been applied to create three-dimensional cultures using photolithography (6,7). Additionally, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, polymethylmethacrylate, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and polyester have been applied for the culture platform, while bypassing lithography (810). A previous study proved that three-dimensional culture systems have demonstrated the importance of intercellular interactions in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation (3).

Human mesenchymal stem cells have previously been isolated and characterized from the gingiva (11), and gingiva-derived stem cells have been applied for tissue-engineering purposes (12). Thus, the present study was performed to generate size-controllable stem cell spheroids using concave microwells. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to create size-controllable spheroids using gingiva-derived stem cells.

Materials and methods

Isolation and culture of gingiva-derived stem cells

Gingival tissues were collected from healthy patients undergoing clinical crown-lengthening procedures. The design of the study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea) (no. KC11SISI0348), and informed consent was obtained from the patients.

The gingival tissues were immediately placed in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Welgene, Inc., Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea) with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C. The tissues were de-epithelialized, separated into 1–2 mm2 fragments, and digested in 0.2 µm filtered, modified, minimal essential medium-α (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) containing dispase (1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich Co.) and collagenase IV (2 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich Co.). The cell suspension was filtered with a 70-µm cell strainer (Falcon, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and the cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. After 24 h, the non-adherent cells were washed with PBS, replaced with fresh medium every 2–3 days.

Formation of spheres

Polydimethylsiloxane-based concave micromolds (Prosys® StemFit 3D; Prodizen Inc., Seoul, Korea) with 600 µm diameters were generated using soft lithography techniques (Fig. 1). Spheroids were formed in the concave microwells. Subsequently, 1×105 (group A) or 2×105 (group B) stem cells/concave micromold were seeded and subsequently cultured for ≤8 days to investigate the cellular behavior.

Evaluation of cellular morphology

The morphology of the microspheres was viewed under an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRM; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The images were saved as JPEGs.

Determination of cell viability

A cell viability analysis was performed on days 1, 3 and 8. 2-(2-Methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3- (4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST-8) [Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8); Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan] was added to the cultures, and the spheres were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Viable cells were identified using a CCK-8 assay, which relies on the ability of mitochondrial dehydrogenases to oxidize WST-8 into a formazan product. The spectrophotometric absorbance of the samples at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

Statistical analysis

The data are represented as mean ± standard deviation of the experiments. A test of normality was performed, and a Student's t-test or a two-way analysis of variance with post hoc test was performed to determine the differences between the groups using a commercially available program (SPSS 12 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Evaluation of cell morphology

Gingiva-derived stem cells formed spheroids in concave microwells. The morphology of the spheroids at day 1 is shown in Fig. 2A and B. The morphology of the spheroids at days 2 and 3 were similar to that of day 1 (Fig. 2C–F). No significant changes were noted with the longer incubation time (Fig. 3). The diameters of the spheroids were larger in group A, compared to those of group B. The average spheroid diameters in group A were 142.7±11.1, 167.8±12.6, 166.4±12.8, 144.1±23.9, 151.0±11.1 and 144.1±6.4 µm for days 1–6, respectively (Fig. 4). The average spheroid diameters in group B were 200.0±8.7, 188.8±11.1, 214.8±18.9, 194.8±27.9, 176.2±15.1 and 186.0±4.8 µm for days 1–6, respectively. The diameters of the spheroids were maintained throughout the incubation time without statistically significant differences (P>0.05).

Cell viability

Cell viability was measured in the spheres made from polydimethylsiloxane-based concave micromolds after culturing at days 1, 3 and 8 (Fig. 5). The cell viability in group B was higher compared to group A at each time point, although there were no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). The relative CCK-8 assay values of groups A and B at day 3 were 153.1±7.6 and 167.8±6.8%, respectively, assuming that the CCK-8 result of group A on day 1 was considered 100% (100.0±1.8%). The relative CCK-8 assay values of groups A and B at day 8 were 130.8±2.3 and 149.2±0.6%, respectively, assuming that the CCK-8 result of group A on day 1 was considered 100% (100.0±1.8%). The relative viability of groups A and B at day 8 were 85.5±1.5 and 88.9±0.3%, when compared with the viability of each group at day 3.

Discussion

In the present study, size-controllable stem cell spheroids were generated using microwells. The study clearly showed that the shape of the spheroids and their viability were maintained during the experimental periods.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to apply gingiva-derived stem cells to three-dimensional spheroids. Stem cells can be obtained intraorally, including from the maxilla and mandible; this was suggested as a treatment option in tissue-engineering fields (13,14). The gingiva, periosteum and bone marrow from the maxillofacial region are considered favorable sources of stem cells, as stem cells can be harvested from the jaw bone under local anesthesia (13,15). Additionally, stem cells may be obtained intraorally, including from dental pulp and the periodontal ligament, but only a limited number of times; however, the gingiva is an easily accessible tissue source with wider availability (16).

In the present study, the size of the spheroids were controlled by the number of cells loaded initially, and their morphology was controlled by the shape of the well (5). The shape of the microwell can be modified into different shapes, including rectangles and triangles (3). Various cell types have been applied to microwells, including embryonic stem cells, islet cells and hepatocytes (5,17,18). A previous study suggested that size may be an important parameter that influences cell differentiation (19).

Various methods may be applied to evaluate the viability of the spheroids. A protein assay may be considered an indirect measurement of cell viability, as it measures the protein content of cells, regardless of cell death (20). The trypan blue assay may be applied as the assay is based on the principle that live cells possess intact cell membranes that prevent penetration of the dye (21). The MTT assay may be more sensitive for assessing stem cell viability as it measures viability by determining mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity (22,23). However, further treatment is required to solubilize formazan crystals, and the MTT agent may be toxic to cells (23). Thus, a cell counting kit utilizing a water-soluble tetrazolium salt test was applied for the viability test as it is reported to be more sensitive than the MTT assay and less toxic to the tested cells (23,24).

The three-dimensional culture system for cell differentiation and proliferation may improve the current understanding of the structure-function association under normal and pathological conditions (25). It was reported that the three-dimensional behaviors of stem cells were different from the two-dimensional behaviors and that the three-dimensional system simulates the real situation more closely (26). Additionally, a three-dimensional spheroid system may be applied as a tool for skeletal tissue regeneration (27).

The co-culture method may be applied for enhanced functionality. Single primary islet cells have been co-cultured with adipose-derived stem cells in concave microwells, resulting in improved viability and function (17,18,28). Stem cells may have significant potential to protect primary cells from damage during culturing and may be employed to improve cell survival and function prior to transplantation (17). Another study used primary pancreatic islets and hepatocytes for the three-dimensional co-culture model, and these two types of cells appeared to strongly support the functions of each other as spheroids, even though smaller proportions of each cell type were evaluated when compared to the mono-culture models (18). Size-controllable spheroids with primary hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells secreted more albumin compared to the mono-culture hepatospheres, and the enzymatic activity of co-cultured heterospheres was higher compared to that of a mono-culture of hepatospheres (28).

Within the limits of the present study, size-controllable stem cell spheroids were generated from gingival cells using microwells. The shape of the spheroids and the viability were clearly maintained during the experimental periods.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, Information and Communication Technology and Future Planning (grant no. NRF-2014R1A1A1003106).

References

1 

Moshaverinia A, Chen C, Xu X, Akiyama K, Ansari S, Zadeh HH and Shi S: Bone regeneration potential of stem cells derived from periodontal ligament or gingival tissue sources encapsulated in RGD-modified alginate scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A. 20:611–621. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Jeong SH, Kim BB, Lee JE, Ko Y and Park JB: Evaluation of the effects of Angelicae dahuricae radix on the morphology and viability of mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Med Rep. 12:1556–1560. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Hsiao C and Palecek SP: Microwell regulation of pluripotent stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Bionanoscience. 2:266–276. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Choi YY, Chung BG, Lee DH, Khademhosseini A, Kim JH and Lee SH: Controlled-size embryoid body formation in concave microwell arrays. Biomaterials. 31:4296–4303. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Karp JM, Yeh J, Eng G, Fukuda J, Blumling J, Suh KY, Cheng J, Mahdavi A, Borenstein J, Langer R, et al: Controlling size, shape and homogeneity of embryoid bodies using poly(ethylene glycol) microwells. Lab Chip. 7:786–794. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Mohr JC, de Pablo JJ and Palecek SP: 3-D microwell culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials. 27:6032–6042. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Khademhosseini A, Ferreira L, Blumling J III, Yeh J, Karp JM, Fukuda J and Langer R: Co-culture of human embryonic stem cells with murine embryonic fibroblasts on microwell-patterned substrates. Biomaterials. 27:5968–5977. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Kang L, Hancock MJ, Brigham MD and Khademhosseini A: Cell confinement in patterned nanoliter droplets in a microwell array by wiping. J Biomed Mater Res A. 93:547–557. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sakai Y, Yoshida S, Yoshiura Y, Mori R, Tamura T, Yahiro K, Mori H, Kanemura Y, Yamasaki M and Nakazawa K: Effect of microwell chip structure on cell microsphere production of various animal cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 110:223–229. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Selimović S, Piraino F, Bae H, Rasponi M, Redaelli A and Khademhosseini A: Microfabricated polyester conical microwells for cell culture applications. Lab Chip. 11:2325–2332. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jin SH, Lee JE, Yun JH, Kim I, Ko Y and Park JB: Isolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells from gingival connective tissue. J Periodontal Res. 50:461–467. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Jin SH, Kweon H, Park JB and Kim CH: The effects of tetracycline-loaded silk fibroin membrane on proliferation and osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cells. J Surg Res. 192:e1–e9. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Park JB, Bae SS, Lee PW, Lee W, Park Y-H, Kim H, Lee KH and Kim IS: Comparison of stem cells derived from periosteum and bone marrow of jaw bone and long bone in rabbit models. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 9:224–230. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Park JB, Lee KS, Lee W, Kim HS, Lee KH and Kim IS: Establishment of the chronic bone defect model in experimental model mandible and evaluation of the efficacy of the mesenchymal stem cells in enhancing bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 10:18–24. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Park JB, Lee G, Yun BG, Kim CH and Ko Y: Comparative effects of chlorhexidine and essential oils containing mouth rinse on stem cells cultured on a titanium surface. Mol Med Rep. 9:1249–1253. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Zhang Q, Shi S, Liu Y, Uyanne J, Shi Y, Shi S and Le AD: Mesenchymal stem cells derived from human gingiva are capable of immunomodulatory functions and ameliorate inflammation-related tissue destruction in experimental colitis. J Immunol. 183:7787–7798. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Jun Y, Kang AR, Lee JS, Park SJ, Lee DY, Moon SH and Lee SH: Microchip-based engineering of super-pancreatic islets supported by adipose-derived stem cells. Biomaterials. 35:4815–4826. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Jun Y, Kang AR, Lee JS, Jeong GS, Ju J, Lee DY and Lee SH: 3D co-culturing model of primary pancreatic islets and hepatocytes in hybrid spheroid to overcome pancreatic cell shortage. Biomaterials. 34:3784–3794. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Hwang YS, Chung BG, Ortmann D, Hattori N, Moeller HC and Khademhosseini A: Microwell-mediated control of embryoid body size regulates embryonic stem cell fate via differential expression of WNT5a and WNT11. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:16978–16983. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Fotakis G and Timbrell JA: In vitro cytotoxicity assays: Comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett. 160:171–177. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Altman SA, Randers L and Rao G: Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations. Biotechnol Prog. 9:671–674. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Park JB: Effects of doxycycline, minocycline and tetracycline on cell proliferation, differentiation and protein expression in osteoprecursor cells. J Craniofac Surg. 22:1839–1842. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Almazin SM, Dziak R, Andreana S and Ciancio SG: The effect of doxycycline hyclate, chlorhexidine gluconate, and minocycline hydrochloride on osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Periodontol. 80:999–1005. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Jue SS, Lee WY, Kwon YD, Kim YR, Pae A and Lee B: The effects of enamel matrix derivative on the proliferation and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21:741–746. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Seo S and Na K: Mesenchymal stem cell-based tissue engineering for chondrogenesis. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011:8068912011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Valarmathi MT, Yost MJ, Goodwin RL and Potts JD: The influence of proepicardial cells on the osteogenic potential of marrow stromal cells in a three-dimensional tubular scaffold. Biomaterials. 29:2203–2216. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Occhetta P, Centola M, Tonnarelli B, Redaelli A, Martin I and Rasponi M: High-throughput microfluidic platform for 3D cultures of mesenchymal stem cells, towards engineering developmental processes. Sci Rep. 5:102882015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wong SF, No Y, Choi YY, Kim DS, Chung BG and Lee SH: Concave microwell based size-controllable hepatosphere as a three-dimensional liver tissue model. Biomaterials. 32:8087–8096. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2016
Volume 4 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lee SI, Yeo SI, Kim BB, Ko Y and Park JB: Formation of size‑controllable spheroids using gingiva‑derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests. Biomed Rep 4: 97-101, 2016
APA
Lee, S., Yeo, S., Kim, B., Ko, Y., & Park, J. (2016). Formation of size‑controllable spheroids using gingiva‑derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests. Biomedical Reports, 4, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.539
MLA
Lee, S., Yeo, S., Kim, B., Ko, Y., Park, J."Formation of size‑controllable spheroids using gingiva‑derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests". Biomedical Reports 4.1 (2016): 97-101.
Chicago
Lee, S., Yeo, S., Kim, B., Ko, Y., Park, J."Formation of size‑controllable spheroids using gingiva‑derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests". Biomedical Reports 4, no. 1 (2016): 97-101. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.539