Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer

  • Authors:
    • Xiaogang Li
    • Ping Lu
    • Bo Li
    • Wangfu Zhang
    • Kaiyuan Luo
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 13, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1298
  • Pages: 1225-1228
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The current study investigated the effects of iodine‑125 seeds on the gene methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer. Mouse models of human colorectal cancer were randomly divided into an experimental group (n=25) and a control group (n=25). The control group was implanted with blank seeds (0 MBq) and the experimental group with iodine-125 seeds (14.8 MBq). At 20 days after implantation, the animals were sacrificed. The methylation levels of SFRP2 and P16 were detected using methylation-specific polymerase chain reactions (MSPs). Following iodine-125 seed irradiation, the level of SFRP2 methylation decreased. The methylation index of the experimental group (0.67±0.05) was significantly lower than that of the control group (0.84±0.07; P<0.05). In the experimental group, 10 samples (40%) displayed methylation in the P16 promoter region compared with 14 (56%) in the control group, which was a significant difference (P<0.05). Iodine-125 seeds induce the downregulation of methylated tumor suppressor gene promoters, thereby inhibiting the proliferation and growth of tumor cells.

Introduction

As the social economy develops and lifestyles and food habits change, the incidence rate of colorectal cancer is increasing in China, with an annual increase that has reached as high as 4% since the 1970s. In the US, colorectal cancer has become the third most common cause of cancer-associated mortalities (1). Patients presenting with this disease have a notably shortened life span, as well as a poor quality of life. Radical surgery fails to achieve satisfactory results, with a recurrence rate >33% (2). This rate may reach as high as 90% following radical surgery (3). Even radical surgery combined with intraoperative chemotherapy is only able to achieve a local control rate of 50% (2). For patients with intrapelvic recurrent colorectal cancer, traditional surgery achieves a 3-year survival rate of only 8% (no 5-year survival rate) and a median time of remission from bleeding and pain of between 5 and 6 months (4). Although total pelvic exenteration may achieve a superior curative effect, the 3-year survival rate is no more than 32% (5). The prognosis following palliative surgery is much worse. Colorectal cancer has a high recurrence rate following surgery and is difficult to re-treat. Neither chemotherapy alone nor additional surgery is able to achieve a satisfactory curative effect. Therefore, radiotherapy has attracted an increasing amount of attention.

Radioactive particles have a persistent lethal effect on the uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells with a definite curative effect on tumors. Radioactive particles may achieve a 3-year survival rate of up to 87.2% (6). Iodine-125 seeds have a long half-life and low energy with excellent stability, which has led to their extensive application in clinical practice. Jarusevicius et al (7) first applied permanent implantation with 229 iodine-125 seeds for a malignant neurilemmoma following chemoradiotherapy failures and obtained successful results. Since then, permanent iodine-125 seed implantation has been used as the preferred method for the treatment of prostate cancer in the US, Canada, South Africa and other countries. Iodine-125 seed implantation has also been gradually applied in the treatment of other malignant carcinomas, including breast carcinoma, brain neoplasm, lung carcinoma and hepatocarcinoma (68). The authors of the present study have used this technique for >20 types of malignant carcinomas since developing and popularizing it in China for the first time in 1999 (9,10). Brachytherapy with iodine-125 seed implantation has since been reported to have favorable curative effects on tumors, and this technique has become an important method for the treatment of colorectal cancer (11,12). Studies have demonstrated that the development of colorectal cancer is accompanied by the CpG island hypermethylation of numerous tumor suppressor gene promoters and that promoter hypermethylation leads to the downregulation or silencing of tumor suppressor gene expression (13,14). However, the effect of iodine-125 seeds on gene methylation has not been reported.

In the current study, we implanted iodine-125 seeds into mice with colorectal cancer to detect its effects on the methylation of the SFRP2 and P16 tumor suppressor genes.

Materials and methods

Animals

Fifty male Balb/c-nu/nu mice aged between 6 and 8 weeks and weighing between 18 and 20 g were purchased from The Beijing Cancer Institute (Beijing, China). The animals had been subcutaneously inoculated with HCT-8 human colorectal cancer cells at the right armpit under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions and the diameters of the tumors were ~0.5±0.3 cm. After purchase, the mice were fed under SPF conditions.

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (2007). The animal use protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kunming Medical University (Kunming, China).

Primer design
SFRP2 primers

SFRP2 primers were designed at http://www.urogene.org/methprimer (accessed November 3, 2011 (15). The following sequence was synthesized: 5′-GTT TTT TTT ATT TTT TAG ATT TGT ATA AAA AAG GTT AAG AAA ATT TTG GTT GTG TTT TAG TAA CGG TTT ATT TTG TTT TTT CGG GTC GGA GTT TTT CGG AGT TGC GCG CGG GTT TGT AGC GTT TCG TTC GCG TTG TTT TTT CGG TGT TTC GTT TTT TCG CGT TTT AGT CGT CGG TTG TTA GTT TTT CGG GGT TTC GAG TCG TAT TTA GCG AAG AGA GCG GGT TCG GGA TAA GTT CGA ATT TCG GTC GTT TCG TTT TTT TTC GGT TTC GTT TTT TTT GTT TTT TCG GGG TCG CGC GTT TAC GAT GTT GTA GGG TTT TGG TTC GTT GTT GTT GTT TTT TTT CGT TTC GTA TTG TTG TTT GGG TTC GGC GCG CGG GTT TTT TTT TTT TGG TTA GTT CGA TTT TTT TTA TAA GCG TAG TAA TTG TAA GTT TAT TTT TGT TAA TTT GTA GTT GTG TTA CGG TAT CGA ATA TTA GAA TAT GCG GTT GTT TAA TTT GTT GGG TTA CGA GAT TAT GAA GGA GGT GTT GGA GTA GGT CGG CGT TTG GAT-3′. Within the sequence, the analyzed methylation segment was 5′-TTG TTT TTT CGG TGT TTC GTT TTT TCG CGT TTT AGT CGT CG-3′ pink-marked), the F primer was 5′-GAA AAT TTT GGT TGT GTT TTA GTA A-3′ (blue-marked), the S primer was 5′-GTT GTT AGT TTT T-3′ (blue-marked), and the R primer was 5′-GAG ATT ATG AAG GAG GTG TTG GAG T-3′ (blue-marked). Methylated sites to be analysed were pink-marked and S primers were blue marked.

P16 primers. Sequences were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), as previously described (16). The wild type primers (P16-W) were 5′-CAG AGG GTG GGG CGG ACC CC-3′ and 3′-CGG GCC GCG GCC GTG G-5′, with an amplification product length (APL) of 140 bp. The methylation specific primers (P16-M) were 5′-TTA TTA GAG GGT GGG GCG GAT CGC-3′ and 3′-GAC CCC GAA CCG CGA CCG TAA-5′, with an amplification length of 150 bp. The methylation nonspecific primers (P16-U) were 5′-TTA TTA GAG GGT GGG GTG GAT TGT-3′ and 3′-CAA CCC CAA ACC ACA ACC ATA A-5′, with an APL of 151 bp.

Iodine-125 seed implantation

The animals were randomized into a control group and an experimental group (n=25 in each). The control group was implanted with blank seeds (intensity of radioactivity, 0 MBq) and the experimental group was implanted with iodine-125 seeds (14.8 MBq). At 20 days after implantation, the animals were sacrificed using cervical dislocation. The tumors were harvested and weighed (Wt). Spherical tumors with a diameter of ~1.5 cm (using the seed source as the center) were obtained and then immediately stored at −80°C.

DNA extraction

Approximately 10 μg of DNA were diluted in 18 μl of sterile water. Following water bath denaturation, the sample was applied to sodium bisulfate treatment liquid for 12–16 h in a water bath in the dark as well as purification. The DNA sample was eluted into 50 μl of sterile water, then 11 μl of NaOH was added and mixed. After 15 min in a water bath at 37°C, 166 μl of 5 M ammonium acetate, 750 μl of dehydrated alcohol and 200 μl of isopropanol were added. The solution was subject to 2–4 h of precipitation at −20°C, centrifugation and then atmospheric drying. The obtained products were placed into 50 μl of TE buffer and kept at −20°C. Assays and the determination of A260/A280 ratios were performed using a spectrophotometer (Biowave DNA; WPA Company, Taunton, UK).

Sulfite management

Approximately 10 μl of DNA liquid was managed according to the instructions of a CpGenome™ Turbo Bisulfite Modification kit (Millipore, Shanghai, China). After water bath denaturation, at 50°C the sample was applied to sodium bisulfate treatment liquid for 12–16 h of a water bath away from light as well as purification. DNA elution buffer (30 μl) was used to recycle the DNA.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

PCR was performed using TransStart Taq DNA polymerase (TransGen Biotech Company, Beijing, China). The reaction system at 30 μl contained 10 μl of DNA, 2 μl of the F primer, 2 μl of the R primer, 4 μl of 10X TransStart Taq buffer, 2 μl of 1.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μl of DNA polymerase and 9.5 μl of ddH2O. The amplification conditions consisted of 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 56 °C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 5 min. The amplification products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis.

Methylation detection

Approximately 20 μl of the PCR products were analyzed for methylation using a Pyromark ID96 instrument and a single-stranded DNA purification PyroGold reagent kit (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden). The procedure was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Methylation indices

Approximately 20 μl of DNA solution, 3 μl of magnetic beads (Millipore, Shanghai, China), 40 μl of binding buffer (Millipore) and 17 μl deionized water were mixed for premixed liquid. The liquid was applied to a PCE plate, sealed and then agitated for 15 min to allow sufficient binding of the DNA strands and magnetic beads. A Pyromark plate solution was prepared with 2.1 μl sequencing primers (10 μM) and 24.5 μl of Pyromark Anneling buffer. The solution was added to a PCR instrument. Three-minute annealing at 80°C was performed. Denaturation solution, dehydrated alcohol, wash buffer (Millipore) and deionized water were added to the bench board (Millipore). The two types of solution were respectively placed into their assigned positions and a detecting head was used to attract the DNA single strands in the Pyromark solution. The Pyromark plate solution was dislodged and added to the PCR instrument for 2 min for annealing at 80°C. dNTP, substrates and DNAase were correspondingly added to reagent cabins. The prepared reagent cabins and Pyromark plate solution were detected by a pyrosequencing instrument (17).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). ANOVA was used to compare the SFRP2 methylation indices and the difference was tested using a Student’s t-test. The difference in the incidence rates of P16 methylation between groups was analyzed using a Chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

Results

SFRP2 methylation

According to the SFRP2 methylation detection results, the six C/T sites were the methylated sites. The methylation levels at these six sites were 54.4%, 54.6%, 60.1%, 61.2%, 57.4% and 58.5%, respectively. The methylation index (Mtl) (18) was 57.7%. The results are shown in Fig. 1, as follows: C1: C/TGAC/TGACTAAAAC/TGC/TGAAAAAAC/TGAAACACC/TGAAAAAACAA.

Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis of P16

DNA was amplified in the experimental and control groups following the modification of the tumor tissues using the P16-M and P16-U primers. In the experimental group, 10 samples exhibited positive P16-M amplification and 15 exhibited positive P16-U amplification. In the control group, 14 samples exhibited positive P16-M amplification and 11 exhibited negative results. The MSP amplification products were subjected to electrophoresis and the gels were photographed. The results are shown in Fig. 2.

Statistical analysis of P16 methylation

In the control group, methylation in the P16 promoter region was detected in 14 samples (56%). In the experimental group, P16 methylation was demonstrated in 10 samples (40%), which demonstrated a significant difference between the groups (P<0.05; Table I and Fig. 2).

Table I.

P16 methylation in the experimental and control groups.

Table I.

P16 methylation in the experimental and control groups.

GroupNo. of miceMethylation (%)Non-methylation (%)
Experimental2510 (40)15 (60)
Control2514 (56)11 (44)
Total5024 (48)26 (52)

Discussion

The development of colorectal cancer involves numerous factors and multiple steps. This process is invariably accompanied by noticeable genetic changes. However, genetic changes do not provide a complete explanation for the development of all colorectal cancers. As epigenetics advances, it has been demonstrated that DNA methylation plays a critical role in the development of colorectal cancer. The joint action of DNA methylation and genetic changes leads to tumorigenesis (18). SFRP2 and P16 are tumor suppressor genes that participate in cell cycle regulation. Their normal expression inhibits cell division and growth (19). However, their hypermethylation may lead to tumorigenesis.

Iodine-125 seeds have been applied in the treatment of prostate carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, brain cancer and colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Iodine-125 seeds release γ-rays with an energy of ~35.5 keV and an effective irradiation radius of ~1.7 cm and, therefore, provide a low-dose irradiation treatment. The main effect of iodine-125 seeds on tumors is damage to the DNA duplex structure by irradiation, resulting in apoptosis (20).

This study aimed to investigate the effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer. Iodine-125 seeds were used as the γ-ray source to act on tumor cells and the changes in SFRP2 promoter methylation were quantitatively detected. The results showed that the level of SFRP2 methylation decreased following iodine-125 irradiation. The methylation index (Mtl) of the experimental group (0.67±0.05) demonstrated a significant difference compared with that of the control group (0.84±0.07; Student’s t-test: P<0.05). Furthermore, the CpG island methylation in the P16 promoter region was detected using MSP. The results showed that the methylation positive rate of the experimental group (40%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (56%; P<0.05). This result indicates that iodine-125 seed irradiation decreases the P16 methylation rate in tumor tissues to a certain extent to inhibit tumors. This was in accordance with our predictions: iodine-125 seeds downregulate tumor suppressor gene promoter methylation to inhibit the proliferation and growth of tumor cells. In addition, this study showed that certain tumor tissues implanted with iodine-125 seeds, and some without such an implantation, displayed the coexistence of methylated and non-methylated amplification products. This phenomenon is likely due to the coexistence of different cell subsets in tumors, the existence of normal tissues in tumors or the methylation of one allele rather than another.

The mechanisms underlying the downregulatory effect of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation level of tumor suppressor genes remain uncertain. The possible mechanisms may include the following: i) γ-rays directly damage the double strands of DNA, and ii) γ-rays downregulate the expression of DNA methyltransferases. DNA double strand disruption is the main form of DNA damage caused by γ-rays. DNA damage is accompanied by the repair startup. Although disrupted DNA may be restored by means of recombination and partial fragment resection, the already methylated cytosine may also be resected during the process, which reduces the level of methylated cytosine and reduces the level of CpG island methylation. By contrast, the generation and maintenance of methylation requires the participation of methyltransferases. Therefore, the downregulated expression of the associated enzymes caused by γ-rays results in a reduced methylation level. Iodine-125 seed irradiation at a dose of 4 Gy decreases the protein expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3b in SW-1990 human pancreatic cancer cells (13). Another study has demonstrated that reduced methylation is accompanied by the downregulation of DNMT expression (21).

At present, the majority of studies concerning the effects of γ-rays on gene methylation are in vitro tests in cell. However, the environment for cell growth in vitro is different from that in vivo. The accumulated irradiation energy following iodine-125 permanent implantation in clinical practice is also different from a dose administered in trials. Therefore, whether the results of these studies reflect the changes in gene methylation in vivo remains unclear. At present, studies concerning the effect of iodine-125 seeds on tumors primarily focus on DNA strand disruption and cell apoptosis. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the regulatory effect of iodine-125 seeds on the promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes by quantitating the changes in DNA methylation. The study provides a practical basis for the application of iodine-125 seed implantation in the treatment of tumors. However, since iodine-125 seed implantation is a new technique, its molecular biology remains to be explored.

References

1. 

Kunnumakkara AB, Diagaradjane P, Anand P, et al: Curcumin sensitizes human colorectal cancer to capecitabine by modulation of cyclin D1, COX-2, MMP-9, VEGF and CXCR4 expression in an orthotopic mouse model. Int J Cancer. 125:2187–2197. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2. 

Moriya Y: Treatment strategy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 36:127–131. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3. 

Friel CM, Cromwell JW, Marra C, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA and Garcia-Aguílar J: Salvage radical surgery after failed local excision for early rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 45:875–879. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4. 

Vermaas M, Ferenschild FT, Verhoef C, et al: Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 33:452–458. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5. 

Guiney MJ, Smith JG, Worotniuk V, Ngan S and Blakey D: Radiotherapy treatment for isolated loco-regional recurrence of rectosigmoid cancer following definitive surgery: Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience, 1981–1990. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 38:1019–1025. 1997.

6. 

Wang J, Sui A, Jia Y, et al: Treatment of unresectable advanced gastric cancer using iodine-125 brachytherapy. Chin J Clin Oncol. 3:212–215. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

7. 

Jarusevicius L, Inciura A, Juozaityte E, Vaiciunas K, Vaitkus A and Sniureviciute M: Comparison of implant quality between loose and intra-operatively linked iodine-125 seeds in prostate cancer brachytherapy. J Radiat Res. 53:439–446. 2012.

8. 

Straver ME, Loo CE, Alderliesten T, Rutgers EJ and Vrancken Peeters MT: Marking the axilla with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) may reduce the need for axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Br J Surg. 97:1226–1231. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

9. 

Ma ZH, Yang Y, Zou L and Luo KY: 125I seed irradiation induces up-regulation of the genes associated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and inhibits growth of gastric cancer xenografts. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 31:612012. View Article : Google Scholar

10. 

Luo KY, Shao QH, Yang GK, et al: 125I seed implantation in sphincter preservation for treatment of low rectal cancer. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 85:1355–1357. 2005.(In Chinese).

11. 

Wang JJ, Yuan HS, Li JN, Jiang WJ, Jiang YL and Tian SQ: Interstitial permanent implantation of 125I seeds as salvage therapy for re-recurrent rectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 24:391–399. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

12. 

Ma JX, Jin ZD, Si PR, et al: Continuous and low-energy 125I seed irradiation changes DNA methyltransferases expression patterns and inhibits pancreatic cancer tumor growth. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 30:352011.PubMed/NCBI

13. 

Waddington CH: Preliminary notes on the development of the wings in normal and mutant strains of drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 25:299–307. 1939. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14. 

Esteller M: Epigenetics in cancer. N Engl J Med. 358:1148–1159. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

15. 

Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB, et al: Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 39:457–466. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16. 

Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD and Baylin SB: Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:9821–9826. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17. 

Löf-Ohlin ZM and Nilsson TK: Pyrosequencing assays to study promoter CpG site methylation of the O6-MGMT, hMLH1, p14ARF, p16INK4a, RASSF1A, and APC1A genes. Oncol Rep. 21:721–729. 2009.PubMed/NCBI

18. 

Jubb AM, Bell SM and Quirke P: Methylation and colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 195:111–134. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19. 

Serrano M, Hannon GJ and Beach D: A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature. 366:704–707. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20. 

Kaiyuan Luo: Practical Insterstitial Brachytherapy of Malignant tumor. Beijing: The People’s Medical Publishing House; first edition. 2008

21. 

Raiche J, Rodriguez-Juarez R, Pogribny I and Kovalchuk O: Sex- and tissue-specific expression of maintenance and de novo DNA methyltransferases upon low dose X-irradiation in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 325:39–47. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November 2013
Volume 6 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Li X, Lu P, Li B, Zhang W and Luo K: Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer. Exp Ther Med 6: 1225-1228, 2013
APA
Li, X., Lu, P., Li, B., Zhang, W., & Luo, K. (2013). Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 6, 1225-1228. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1298
MLA
Li, X., Lu, P., Li, B., Zhang, W., Luo, K."Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 6.5 (2013): 1225-1228.
Chicago
Li, X., Lu, P., Li, B., Zhang, W., Luo, K."Effects of iodine-125 seeds on the methylation of SFRP2 and P16 in colorectal cancer". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 6, no. 5 (2013): 1225-1228. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1298