Establishment of transgenic fibroblasts for producing recombinant human interferon-α and erythropoietin in bovine milk

  • Authors:
    • Eui-Man Jung
    • Beum-Soo An
    • Yu-Kyung Kim
    • Inho Hwang
    • Jong-Yun Lee
    • Tae‑Young Shin
    • Sang-Hwan Hyun
    • Woo-Suk Hwang
    • Eui-Bae Jeung
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 13, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1182
  • Pages: 406-412
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Human interferon α (IFN-α) and erythropoietin (EPO) have been used for a variety of purposes in clinical medicine. Human IFN-α has been used to treat several types of viral infection and cancer, as well as renal anemia, via stimulation of erythrocyte formation in the bone marrow. Transgenic cattle are excellent candidates for pharmaceutical production for humans due to their ability to produce recombinant proteins in milk. The purpose of the present study was to generate bovine transgenic fibroblasts capable of producing recombinant human IFN-α and EPO proteins in transgenic cattle milk. First, we analyzed the promoter activities of various bovine milk protein genes in HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cells. The bovine milk protein gene promoters were cloned into the Luc gene in a promoter-less pGL3-Basic vector. Presence of the αS1-casein promoter (-175 to +796 nt) resulted in an up to 16-fold increase in luciferase activity compared with that of the promoter-less construct. In addition, the human IFN-α and EPO genes were identified as significantly overexpressed in HC11 cells compared with the promoter-less construct. Together, the present results demonstrate that the construct with the αS1-casein promoter may induce secretion of recombinant human IFN-α and EPO into bovine milk. Furthermore, we generated transgenic fibroblasts expressing human IFN-α and EPO cDNA controlled by the αS1-casein promoter and two screening markers, enhanced green fluorescent protein and neomycin resistance. These transgenic fibroblasts may be a source of somatic cells for generating transgenic cattle that produce recombinant human IFN-α and EPO proteins during lactation.

Introduction

Interferons are proteins produced by the immune system in response to a viral infection (13). These factors are affiliated with a class of glycoproteins known as cytokines and are classified as interferon α (IFN-α), β and γ. IFN-α and -β are involved in immune responses against viral infection (4). IFN-γ is crucial for immunity against viral and bacterial infections as well as tumor development (5). In the 1980s, IFN-α obtained from human leukocytes was used in human medicine (6,7). This factor mediates anticancer effects either indirectly by regulating anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic responses or directly by affecting the proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells. The direct and indirect effects are followed by activation of the JAK-STAT pathway (8,9).

Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone that stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of red blood cell precursors in bone marrow (10). EPO is produced in the liver during fetal and prenatal periods; following birth it is synthesized in the kidney (11). Production and activity of this hormone are sensitive to low oxygen levels in the blood. Kidney cells release EPO when oxygen levels in the blood are low. EPO then stimulates bone marrow to produce more red blood cells, thereby increasing the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood (12,13). Human EPO deficiency is the main cause of anemia in patients with chronic kidney failure. Treatment with recombinant hEPO increases the levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit in anemic patients (1416).

Recombinant protein production using eukaryotic cell culture systems has been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry (17). However, the production of recombinant proteins by transgenic animals is more effective than eukaryotic cell cultures. Additionally, eukaryotic cell cultures established for recombinant protein production may be problematic due to the absence of appropriate mechanisms for performing post-translational modification of the exogenous protein.

Milk was previously identified as a reservoir of recombinant proteins produced by transgenic animals (18,19). Knowledge of the promoter regions of the main functional milk protein genes, including casein and whey acidic protein promoters, is essential for generating transgenic animals that express recombinant proteins in mammary glands (2023). αS1-, αS2-, β-, κ-casein, α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin account for approximately 90% of all proteins in bovine milk (24). Secretion of milk proteins in the mammary gland is regulated by steroid and peptide hormones, including insulin, prolactin (PRL) and hydrocortisone (2527). Promoters of the casein gene possess binding sites for transcription factors, including activators of transcription 5, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein and the glucocorticoid receptor (2830). Expression of milk protein genes is regulated by interactions between particular hormone-activated transcription factors during mammary gland development.

Previously, production of recombinant proteins in the mammary glands of transgenic animals has been widely reported (18,3133). In the present study, we established bovine transgenic fibroblasts able to secrete human IFN-α and EPO into milk. These cells are valuable as a sufficient source for somatic cell nuclear transfer methods for generation of transgenic cattle.

Materials and methods

Animal care

The cattle were fed a standard commercial cow diet (Suwon Purina, Suwon, Kyunggi-Do, Korea) and given water ad libitum in accordance with the animal study guidelines of the SooAm Biotech Research Foundation for Accreditation for Laboratory Animal Care.

Cell culture

Mouse mammalian epithelial HC11 cells (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin (all obtained from Welgene, Daejeon, South Korea), 5 μg/ml insulin (Gibco) and 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Bovine fibroblasts were obtained from a miniature bovine fetus (Deutsche Schwarzbunte) on day 30 of pregnancy. Bovine fibroblasts were then cultured in DMEM (Gibco) containing 10% FBS, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin. All cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Genomic DNA extraction and PCR

Genomic DNA of the bovine fibroblasts was isolated with a G-DEX™ IIc Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Intron Biotechnology, Seoul, South Korea). Genomic DNA (1 μg) was amplified in a 20-μl PCR containing 1 unit LA-Taq polymerase (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) for long-range PCR or 1 unit i-star Taq polymerase (Intron) for the standard PCR, 2 mM dNTPs (Takara) and 10 pmol of each specific primer. Details of all primers used are presented in Table I. PCR was performed with the following program: denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 62°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1, 2 or 3 min. The PCR products were separated on a 0.7% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and images were captured under UV illumination. Images were scanned using Gel Doc EQ (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The products were then used for cloning.

Table I

Sequences of the primers with specific restriction enzyme sites used in the present study.

Table I

Sequences of the primers with specific restriction enzyme sites used in the present study.

NameRestriction enzymeDirectionSequence (5′ to 3′)
αS1-casein promoter (−2,239)MluIFACG CGT GGC CTT CTT AAA TGA ACA ATG CAA
αS1-casein promoter (−1,160)MluIFACG CGT AGT GGA CAG CCT GAA CAG TTT TGA
αS1-casein promoter (−175)MluIFACG CGT AGA ACA ATG CCA TTC CAT TTC CTG
αS1-casein promoter (+796)XhoIRCTC GAG TGT GCT GGA AAA ATG CGT TTC AGA
αS2-casein promoter (−257)MluIFACG CGT GTG GAA GAG CTG AGC TAC ACA AAC
αS2-casein promoter (+1.296)XhoIRCTC GAG AAG GGG AAG AAT TGG CAG GTG AAA
β-casein promoter (−331)MluIFACG CGT CCA AGA TCT CAA AGA CCC ACC GAA
β-casein promoter(+1,091)XhoIRCTC GAG CAG GGT GTC AGA TCT CTG CCC AGT
κ-casein promoter(−180)MluIFACG CGT TTT CCT CCT CTG CAT TCC ATT AAC C
κ-casein promoter (+1,241)XhoIRCTC GAG AGA GCG CAC ACC AGA CTC AAC TCA
α-lactalbumin (−665)MluIFACG CGT AGT GGT ATT GGT GGT TGG GGA TGG
α-lactalbumin (+408)XhoIRCTC GAG CCG AAA AAG GCT CTC CAA CCA ATC
β-lactoglobulin (−682)MluIFACG CGT GAG GTG GGA GGT TGG GTC CTG TAG
β-lactoglobulin (+303)XhoIRCTC GAG CCA GCC TCC AGA ATG CAA GAC ACT
hIFN-αNcoIFCCA TGG ATG GCC TTG ACC TTT CGT TTA C
hIFN-αXbaIRTCT AGA TCA TTC CTT ACT TCT TAA ACT TTC TTG
hEPONcoIFCCA TGG ATG GGG GTG CAC GAA T
hEPOXbaIRTCT AGA TCA TCT GTC CCC TGT CCT GCA GG
EGFP cDNAEcoRVFGAT ATC CAC AAC CAT GGT GAG CAA GGG CGA
EGFP cDNABamHIRGGA TCC TTA CTT GTA CAG CTC GTC CAT GCC
hIFN-α confirming primer aFTAT CTC AGA GCT ATA GGT GA
hIFN-α confirming primer bRAGG GTC TCA TCC CAA GCA
hEPO confirming primer cFCCC AGT CTT GGG TTC AAG GTA T
hEPO confirming primer dRCAG TGT TCA GCA CAG CCC GT
Confirming primer eFCAT GAA GCA GCA CGA CTT CT
Confirming primer fRCCT AGG AAT GCT CGT CAA GA
Mouse 1AFCCA GGA TTT GGA ATT ATT TC
Mouse 1ARGAA AAT AAA GCC TAA GGC TC
hIFN-αFTCC AAA AGG CTG AAA CCA TC
hIFN-αRCAG GCA CAA GGG CTG TAT TT
hEPOFCAA GGA GGC CGA GAA TAT CA
hEPORCAC TGA CGG CTT TAT CCA CA

[i] hEPO, human erythropoietin; hIFN-α, human interferon α; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; F, forward; R, reverse.

RNA preparation and RT-PCR

Total RNA from HC11 cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of total RNA was determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm. First-strand cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription with total RNA (1 μg) using mMLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random primers (9-mers; Takara). To determine the optimal conditions for logarithmic phase PCR amplification of the target cDNA, aliquots of total cDNA (1 μg) were amplified using various cycle numbers. Mouse cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (1A) gene was used as an internal control to eliminate the possibility of RNA degradation and to control for variations in mRNA concentration. A linear correlation between PCR product band visibility and the number of amplification cycles was observed for the target mRNA sequences. 1A and the target human IFN-α or EPO genes were quantified using 28 and 30 cycles, respectively. PCR was performed as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 58°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The PCR products were separated in a 2.3% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and an image was captured under UV illumination. The image was scanned and band density was analyzed using Gel Doc EQ (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

Vector construction

Restriction and ligase enzymes were obtained from Takara. Various regions of the milk protein gene promoter were prepared by long-range PCR using bovine genomic DNA of the bovine fibroblasts as a template and specific primers containing restriction enzyme sites (MluI at the 5′ end or XhoI at the 3′ end). Amplified fragments were digested with MluI and XhoI and ligated into the promoter-less luciferase expression plasmid pGL3-Basic (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The human IFN-α or EPO expression cassette plasmid was produced in several steps. Human IFN-α or EPO cDNA was prepared by PCR using cDNA amplified from total human RNA (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) as a template. Amplified fragments were ligated into the recombinant pGL3 construct containing the milk protein gene promoter. For cassette selection, the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene was amplified from pIRES2-EGFP (Clontech), digested with EcoRV and BamHI and inserted into the pIRES-Neo plasmid (Clontech). The EGFP and neomycin resistance (Neor) genes were amplified by PCR, digested with SalI and ligated into the recombinant pGL3 vector encoding human IFN-α or EPO controlled by the milk protein gene promoter. Sequences of the targeting vector were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing (Genotech Co. Ltd., Daejeon, South Korea).

Transient transfection and reporter gene assay

Transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To normalize transfection efficiencies of the luciferase constructs, the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV)-lacZ plasmid was used to co-transfect the HC11 cells (34,35). Briefly, 3×105 cells were seeded in 6-well tissue culture plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) 1 day prior to transfection. Constructs (4 μg) containing the milk protein gene promoter and 0.5 μg of the RSV-lacZ plasmid were used to co-transfect the cells in serum-free DMEM (Gibco). Following incubation for 4 h, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS, 5 μg/ml PRL (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.1 μM dexamethasone (DEX; Sigma-Aldrich) and the cells were incubated for an additional 48 h. Luciferase activity in the cell lysates was assayed using a Luciferase Assay System. Luminescence was measured with a GloMax 20/20 Luminometer. β-galactosidase activity was measured using a β-galactosidase Enzyme Assay System (all purchased from Promega). The relative luciferase activity was calculated as luciferase activity/β-galactosidase activity (%).

Establishment of transgenic cell lines

Bovine fibroblasts were transfected with the linearized construct using Lipofectamine 2000. After 24 h, the transfection medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 500 μg/ml G-418 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) for 4 weeks. Antibiotic-resistant colonies were selected according to EGFP expression observed with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The selected colonies were subjected to PCR-based genotyping, using the confirming primer sets presented in Table I.

Data analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and were analyzed with Student’s t-test and two-pair comparisons. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Activities of milk protein gene promoters in the HC11 cells

We monitored the expression of the reporter luciferase (Luc) gene controlled by bovine milk protein gene promoters in mouse mammary epithelial HC11 cells. Various bovine milk protein gene promoters were linked to the Luc gene in a promoter-less pGL3-Basic vector. These constructs were used to transfect HC11 cells and the relative promoter activities were measured with a Luc reporter gene assay. A previous study demonstrated that the expression of milk protein is increased by DEX with PRL in HC11 cells (36). Therefore, we measured bovine milk protein gene promoter activity in the HC11 cells following treatment with DEX and PRL. As demonstrated in Fig. 1, the αS1-casein promoter (−175 to +796 nt) resulted in a 16-fold increase of luciferase activity compared with that of the promoter-less construct. However, activities of the κ-casein, α-lactalbumin and β-lactoglobulin promoters were not identified as significantly altered in the HC11 cells following treatment with DEX and PRL. These results indicate that the αS1-casein promoter is an ideal candidate for inducing the secretion of recombinant human IFN-α and EPO into bovine milk.

Overexpression of recombinant human IFN-α and EPO in HC11 cells

We isolated human IFN-α and EPO cDNA sequences which were sub-cloned into the αS1-casein promoter. RT-PCR was used to measure the levels of human IFN-α and EPO mRNA produced by our recombinant system in HC11 cells. The expression of human IFN-α and EPO mRNA was evaluated following transient transfection with the two recombinant constructs. As demonstrated in Fig. 2, levels of the transcripts were identified as significantly increased in the transfected HC11 cells. These results demonstrate that the αS1-casein promoter is suitable for the production of recombinant human IFN-α and EPO in bovine milk.

Establishment of transgenic bovine fibroblast cell lines

The constructs in the present study were used to express human IFN-α and EPO under the control of the αS1-casein promoter, with two selection markers, EGFP and Neor (Fig. 3A and D). These constructs were linearized and used to transfect bovine fibroblasts using a liposomal-mediated gene delivery system. The fibroblasts were incubated in medium containing G-418 for 4 weeks to select for stable transfectants. Following this, expression of the constructs in the clones was confirmed by EGFP expression observed with fluorescent microscopy (Fig. 4). In addition, the clones were identified by PCR-based methods using primers specific for the constructs. Genomic DNA from clones expressing human IFN-α was analyzed with a, b primers (amplicon size, 914 bp; Fig. 3B) or with e, f primers (amplicon size, 1 kb; Fig. 3C). Additionally, genomic DNA from clones expressing human EPO was evaluated with c, d primers (amplicon size, 965 bp; Fig. 3E) or with e, f primers (amplicon size, 1 kb; Fig. 3F). We verified that the transfection efficiency was ~90% (Table II). Since our constructs included EGFP and Neor selection markers, positive recombination of our target genes into the bovine fibroblast genome was successfully monitored.

Table II

Transfection efficiency of the recombinant human IFN-α and EPO constructs in bovine fibroblasts.

Table II

Transfection efficiency of the recombinant human IFN-α and EPO constructs in bovine fibroblasts.

Cell linesTransfection trialsG418-resistant coloniesEGFP-positive coloniesPCR-positive colonies
Recombinant hIFN-α12514949
Recombinant hEPO24625858

[i] hIFN-α, human interferon alpha; hEPO, human erythropoietin.

Discussion

In the present study, we generated a bovine fibroblast cell line stably expressing human IFN-α and EPO. These cells expressed the human IFN-α and EPO genes under the control of the bovine αS1-casein promoter. EGFP and Neor genes, two selection markers, were also included in the constructs to screen for and isolate the transgenic fibroblasts. EGFP expression is an effective visual marker for confirming the identity of transgenic cattle following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). To select transgenic fibroblasts by antibiotic screening, we used the Neor gene to modify the genome of somatic cells, required for further SCNT-mediated cloning (37,38). Transgenic cattle are the best candidates for producing pharmaceuticals for humans. Transgenic cattle are suitable for the production of large quantities of recombinant proteins in their milk, a trait associated with important economic advantages. Furthermore, expression of recombinant proteins contained in the milk is controlled in a tissue-specific manner (39,40).

We assessed the promoter activities of various bovine milk protein genes in HC11 cells. The αS1-casein promoter demonstrated the highest activity level among all the tested promoters. αS1-casein is a major protein in milk and the promoter has been used to generate transgenic animals (41). Expression of bovine αS1-casein is regulated by the polymorphic activator protein-1 binding site (42). Additionally, levels of milk protein and protein yield are associated with various single-strand conformation polymorphism and gene expression patterns (43). PRL stimulates the production of milk by mammary glands. In general, casein gene expression is activated by PRL in mammals (27,44) and expression of αS1-casein is also induced by PRL in rabbit mammary glands (45). Serum concentrations of PRL are increased during pregnancy, resulting in milk production (46,47). Since our recombinant human IFN-α and EPO constructs contained the αS1-casein promoter, IFN-α and EPO proteins may be synthesized in transgenic cattle during lactation stimulated by PRL.

Human IFN-α has been used to treat several types of viral infection and cancer. This factor induces the immune system response and inhibits cancer cell growth by regulating the expression of several immune-related genes (48,49). Human EPO stimulates the formation of erythrocytes in bone marrow and is used to treat renal anemia (50). Recombinant DNA technology has been used to produce human IFN-α and EPO in eukaryotic cell culture systems (51,52). However, these cell-based systems produce only a limited amount of recombinant proteins. Furthermore, isolating recombinant proteins from these systems is problematic due to an absence of protein post-translational modification. Therefore, we suggest that generating transgenic cattle is the best method for economically producing relatively large quantities of recombinant proteins. Transgenic cattle have an extensive potential for use in biomedicine, agriculture, human health and environmental sustainability (53,54).

In the present study, we established a bovine fibroblast cell line that may be a useful cell source for SCNT procedures to generate transgenic cattle. These transgenic cattle may produce recombinant human IFN-α and EPO proteins in milk. Collectively, these results indicate that this transgenic animal is a good model for producing valuable recombinant human proteins. Additional studies are required to generate transgenic cattle using SCNT technology with transgenic fibroblasts.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (no. PJ008323), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

1 

Fleischmann WR Jr, Kleyn KM and Baron S: Potentiation of antitumor effect of virus-induced interferon by mouse immune interferon preparations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 65:963–966. 1980.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Randall RE and Goodbourn S: Interferons and viruses: an interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures. J Gen Virol. 89:1–47. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Baron S, Hernandez J, Bekisz J, et al: Clinical model: interferons activate human monocytes to an eradicative tumor cell level in vitro. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 27:157–163. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Liu YJ: IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu Rev Immunol. 23:275–306. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Schoenborn JR and Wilson CB: Regulation of interferon-gamma during innate and adaptive immune responses. Adv Immunol. 96:41–101. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Cantell K and Hirvonen S: Large-scale production of human leukocyte interferon containing 10(8) units per ml. J Gen Virol. 39:541–543. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Cantell K and Hirvonen S: Preparation of human leukocyte interferon for clinical use. Tex Rep Biol Med. 35:138–144. 1977.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Radaeva S, Jaruga B, Hong F, et al: Interferon-alpha activates multiple STAT signals and down-regulates c-Met in primary human hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 122:1020–1034. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Wang CJ, Xiao CW, You TG, et al: Interferon-alpha enhances antitumor activities of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated IL-24 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 11:312012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Jelkmann W: Erythropoietin: structure, control of production and function. Physiol Rev. 72:449–489. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Lacombe C, Da Silva JL, Bruneval P, et al: Identification of tissues and cells producing erythropoietin in the anemic mouse. Contrib Nephrol. 66:17–24. 1988.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Neumann E: Regulation of erythropoiesis. Acta Med Austriaca Suppl. 6:360–363. 1979.(In German).

13 

Argenti M: Hematosis and erythropoiesis in guinea pigs exposed to low oxygen pressure. Riv Med Aeronaut. 14:283–313. 1951.(In Italian).

14 

Radtke HW, Claussner A, Erbes PM, Scheuermann EH, Schoeppe W and Koch KM: Serum erythropoietin concentration in chronic renal failure: relationship to degree of anemia and excretory renal function. Blood. 54:877–884. 1979.PubMed/NCBI

15 

Fisher JW: Mechanism of the anemia of chronic renal failure. Nephron. 25:106–111. 1980. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

McGonigle RJ, Wallin JD, Shadduck RK and Fisher JW: Erythropoietin deficiency and inhibition of erythropoiesis in renal insufficiency. Kidney Int. 25:437–444. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Baneyx F: Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 10:411–421. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Houdebine LM: Transgenic animal bioreactors. Transgenic Res. 9:305–320. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Lubo H and Palmer C: Transgenic animal bioreactors - where we are. Transgenic Res. 9:301–304. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Bühler TA, Bruyère T, Went DF, Stranzinger G and Burki K: Rabbit beta-casein promoter directs secretion of human interleukin-2 into the milk of transgenic rabbits. Biotechnology (NY). 8:140–143. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

21 

Cerdan MG, Young JI, Zino E, et al: Accurate spatial and temporal transgene expression driven by a 3.8-kilobase promoter of the bovine beta-casein gene in the lactating mouse mammary gland. Mol Reprod Dev. 49:236–245. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Ebert KM, DiTullio P, Barry CA, et al: Induction of human tissue plasminogen activator in the mammary gland of transgenic goats. Biotechnology (NY). 12:699–702. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Gordon K, Lee E, Vitale JA, Smith AE, Westphal H and Hennighausen L: Production of human tissue plasminogen activator in transgenic mouse milk. 1987. Biotechnology. 24:425–428. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ikonen T, Ojala M and Ruottinen O: Associations between milk protein polymorphism and first lactation milk production traits in Finnish Ayrshire cows. J Dairy Sci. 82:1026–1033. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hennighausen LG, Sippel AE, Hobbs AA and Rosen JM: Comparative sequence analysis of the mRNAs coding for mouse and rat whey protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 10:3733–3744. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Malewski T and Zwierzchowski L: Computer-aided analysis of potential transcription-factor binding sites in the rabbit beta-casein gene promoter. Biosystems. 36:109–119. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Rosen JM, Wyszomierski SL and Hadsell D: Regulation of milk protein gene expression. Annu Rev Nutr. 19:407–436. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Raught B, Liao WS and Rosen JM: Developmentally and hormonally regulated CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein isoforms influence beta-casein gene expression. Mol Endocrinol. 9:1223–1232. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

29 

Buser AC, Gass-Handel EK, Wyszomierski SL, et al: Progesterone receptor repression of prolactin/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5-mediated transcription of the beta-casein gene in mammary epithelial cells. Mol Endocrinol. 21:106–125. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Doppler W, Windegger M, Soratroi C, et al: Expression level-dependent contribution of glucocorticoid receptor domains for functional interaction with STAT5. Mol Cell Biol. 21:3266–3279. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Zinovieva N, Lassnig C, Schams D, et al: Stable production of human insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in the milk of hemi- and homozygous transgenic rabbits over several generations. Transgenic Res. 7:437–447. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Coulibaly S, Besenfelder U, Fleischmann M, et al: Human nerve growth factor beta (hNGF-beta): mammary gland specific expression and production in transgenic rabbits. FEBS Lett. 444:111–116. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Devinoy E, Thépot D, Stinnakre MG, et al: High level production of human growth hormone in the milk of transgenic mice: the upstream region of the rabbit whey acidic protein (WAP) gene targets transgene expression to the mammary gland. Transgenic Res. 3:79–89. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Cheng CK, Hoo RL, Chow BK and Leung PC: Functional cooperation between multiple regulatory elements in the untranslated exon 1 stimulates the basal transcription of the human GnRH-II gene. Mol Endocrinol. 17:1175–1191. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Lee GS, Choi KC, Han HJ and Jeung EB: The classical and a non-classical pathways associated with NF-kappaB are involved in estrogen-mediated regulation of calbindin-D9k gene in rat pituitary cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 277:42–50. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Song S and Oka T: Regulation of type II deiodinase expression by EGF and glucocorticoid in HC11 mouse mammary epithelium. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 284:E1119–E1124. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Jung EM, Kim YK, Lee GS, Hyun SH, Hwang WS and Jeung EB: Establishment of inducible cAMP early repressor transgenic fibroblasts in a porcine model of human type 1 diabetes mellitus. Mol Med Report. 6:239–245. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Kim YK, Lee GS, Jung EM, Hyun SH, Hwang WS and Jeung EB: Generation of fibroblasts overexpressing liver-specific PEPCK in a miniature pig model of human type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Med Report. 6:45–50. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Houdebine LM: Production of pharmaceutical proteins by transgenic animals. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 32:107–121. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Hodges CA and Stice SL: Generation of bovine transgenics using somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 1:812003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Riego E, Limonta J, Aguilar A, et al: Production of transgenic mice and rabbits that carry and express the human tissue plasminogen activator cDNA under the control of a bovine alpha S1 casein promoter. Theriogenology. 39:1173–1185. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Kuss AW, Gogol J, Bartenschlager H and Geldermann H: Polymorphic AP-1 binding site in bovine CSN1S1 shows quantitative differences in protein binding associated with milk protein expression. J Dairy Sci. 88:2246–2252. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Chessa S, Chiatti F, Ceriotti G, et al: Development of a single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping microarray platform for the identification of bovine milk protein genetic polymorphisms. J Dairy Sci. 90:451–464. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Houdebine LM, Teyssot B, Djiane J and Devinoy E: Control of the expression of milk protein genes by prolactin, glucocorticoids and progesterone. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 43:354–369. 1982.(In French).

45 

Pierre S, Jolivet G, Devinoy E, et al: A distal region enhances the prolactin induced promoter activity of the rabbit alpha s1-casein gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 87:147–156. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Shingo T, Gregg C, Enwere E, et al: Pregnancy-stimulated neurogenesis in the adult female forebrain mediated by prolactin. Science. 299:117–120. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Kamel MA, Neulen J, Sayed GH, Salem HT and Breckwoldt M: Heterogeneity of human prolactin levels in serum during the early postpartum period. Gynecol Endocrinol. 7:173–177. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Orru MG, Baita A, Sitzia R, et al: Interferon-alpha-induced psychiatric side effects in patients with chronic viral hepatitis: a prospective, observational, controlled study. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 14:145–153. 2005.(In Italian).

49 

Ferrantini M, Capone I and Belardelli F: Interferon-alpha and cancer: mechanisms of action and new perspectives of clinical use. Biochimie. 89:884–893. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Oster W, Herrmann F, Gamm H, et al: Erythropoietin for the treatment of anemia of malignancy associated with neoplastic bone marrow infiltration. J Clin Oncol. 8:956–962. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

51 

Son YD, Jeong YT, Park SY and Kim JH: Enhanced sialylation of recombinant human erythropoietin in Chinese hamster ovary cells by combinatorial engineering of selected genes. Glycobiology. 21:1019–1028. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Tuite MF, Dobson MJ, Roberts NA, et al: Regulated high efficiency expression of human interferon-alpha in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1:603–608. 1982.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Wall RJ, Kerr DE and Bondioli KR: Transgenic dairy cattle: genetic engineering on a large scale. J Dairy Sci. 80:2213–2224. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Zuelke KA: Transgenic modification of cows milk for value-added processing. Reprod Fertil Dev. 10:671–676. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February 2013
Volume 7 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jung E, An B, Kim Y, Hwang I, Lee J, Shin TY, Hyun S, Hwang W and Jeung E: Establishment of transgenic fibroblasts for producing recombinant human interferon-α and erythropoietin in bovine milk. Mol Med Rep 7: 406-412, 2013
APA
Jung, E., An, B., Kim, Y., Hwang, I., Lee, J., Shin, T. ... Jeung, E. (2013). Establishment of transgenic fibroblasts for producing recombinant human interferon-α and erythropoietin in bovine milk. Molecular Medicine Reports, 7, 406-412. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1182
MLA
Jung, E., An, B., Kim, Y., Hwang, I., Lee, J., Shin, T., Hyun, S., Hwang, W., Jeung, E."Establishment of transgenic fibroblasts for producing recombinant human interferon-α and erythropoietin in bovine milk". Molecular Medicine Reports 7.2 (2013): 406-412.
Chicago
Jung, E., An, B., Kim, Y., Hwang, I., Lee, J., Shin, T., Hyun, S., Hwang, W., Jeung, E."Establishment of transgenic fibroblasts for producing recombinant human interferon-α and erythropoietin in bovine milk". Molecular Medicine Reports 7, no. 2 (2013): 406-412. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2012.1182