Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review

  • Authors:
    • Jun Yi
    • Dong‑Ai Zhou
    • Ji‑Rong Huo
    • Yun‑Hua Wang
    • Jin‑An Ma
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 2, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3987
  • Pages: 1016-1020
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) that primarily occurs in the testes is particularly rare, with only retrospective studies and sporadic cases reported in the literature. The present study describes the case of a large, primary intratesticular RMS (ITRMS) that was treated with a radical inguinal orchiectomy (RIO) and a regimen of chemotherapy. The study also presents a review of the literature regarding primary ITRMSs, aiming to elucidate the clinical characteristics and optimal treatment of the disease. A 14‑year‑old male presented with a 1‑year history of a slow‑growing, painless, left scrotal mass. Magnetic resonance imaging identified a mass in the left scrotum with mixed signal intensity; no abnormal signals were identified in the right testicle and retroperitoneal lymph node. An X‑ray of the chest demonstrated no evidence of metastasis. Subsequent to this, a left RIO was performed. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examination confirmed the final diagnosis of embryonal ITRMS. At 21 days post-surgery, an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG‑PET‑CT) scan identified widespread metastatic lesions in the lungs, local lymph nodes and bones, presenting as increased glucose metabolism nodules. Subsequently, the patient received six sequential cycles of adjunct chemotherapy. The patient is alive with disease in October 2015. The case described is noteworthy as it is an example of ITRMS, in which the patient received successful treatment. However, multidisciplinary treatment may further improve the outcome of the disease.

Introduction

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), originating from the mesenchymal cells, is the most common soft-tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents, with an annual incidence of 4–7 cases per million children aged ≤15 years (1). Intratesticular sarcoma only accounts for 1% of testicular tumors and the majority are germ cell tumors. Intratesticular RMS (ITRMS), a rare sarcoma of the testes, develops rapidly and primarily presents as a painless scrotal mass for <6 months before diagnosis. A radical inguinal orchiectomy (RIO), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, is currently the recommended treatment for ITRMS. The occurrence of distant metastasis is the main cause for unsuccessful treatment. The present study describes a large primary ITRMS, measuring 17×11×11 cm, presenting in an adolescent. Widespread metastasis of the mass was detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET-CT) 3 weeks after the RIO. According to our limited knowledge, the use of FDG-PET-CT has been reported only once previously to determine a clinical stage and evaluate the treatment efficacy of ITRMS (2). The ITRMS described in the present case underwent distant metastasis within a shorter time period than those cases reported in the literature (212). In order to improve our understanding regarding the clinic characteristics of ITRMS, the current study presents a notable case and reviews the available literature of primary ITRMS from the 1960s onwards (212). The patient provided full written informed consent.

Case report

A 14-year-old male was referred to the Department of Urology at a Chenzhou No. 1 People's Hospital (Chenzhou, China) in January 2014, presenting with a 1-year history of a slow-growing, painless, left scrotal mass, which had rapidly become swollen and painful following incidental trauma to the scrotum. Initially, an incision in the scrotum was performed for drainage. Magnetic resonance imaging, performed 3 weeks later, detected a mass in the left scrotum demonstrating mixed signal intensity; no abnormal signal was identified in the right testicle or retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN) (Fig. 1). Several tumor marker levels, including those of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), were all within the normal ranges. An X-ray of the chest demonstrated no evidence of metastasis. Subsequently, a left RIO was performed, with the left testis demonstrating a 17×11×11-cm, whitish malignant tumor, exhibiting necrosis and liquidation. Histologically, viable tumor cells, primarily round and spindle cells, were identified to contain eccentric nuclei and deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 2). The left epididymis was involved macroscopically and microscopically. However, the margin of excision was free from tumor cells. Immunohistochemically, the viable tumor cells stained positively for vimentin, desmin, smooth muscle actin, myogenin, cluster of differentiation (CD)99, CD34 (focally), Ki-67 (70%) and myogenic differentiation 1, with no staining for octamer-binding transcription factor 4 and placental alkaline phosphatase. Finally, the diagnosis of embryonal ITRMS was confirmed. A total of 21 days after surgery, FDG-PET-CT scanning identified widespread metastatic lesions in the lungs, local lymph nodes and bones, presenting as increased glucose metabolism nodules. The effected bones included the 5th thoracic vertebrae, 7th thoracic vertebrae and left caput femoris; The affected lymph nodes located in the left groin, peri-Iliaca vessels and peri-aorta region. The case was therefore classified as stage IV, group IV, with an intermediate risk, according to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) staging and grouping system (9). The patient was administered six sequential 3-week cycles of adjunct chemotherapy (2,000 mg ifosfamide and 40 mg cisplatin on day 1–3, and 120 mg epirubicin on day 1, every 3 weeks). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in the pulmonary lesions, and partial remission (PR) in the bone and lymph node lesions, as evaluated by FDG-PET-CT (Fig. 3).

The patient finished treatment in September 2014 after the sixth cycle of chemotherapy and an evaluation of FDG-PET-CT in May 2015 demonstrated progressive disease in the bones and local lymphnodes and new metastases in the anterior mediastinum and left abdominal cavity. The patient was alive at the latest follow-up in October 2015.

Discussion

The origin of ITRMS remains uncertain. Primary ITRMS should be differentiated from germ cell tumors with a sarcomatous component, other intratesticular spindle cell sarcomas and paratesticular RMS. Teratoma of the testes, cryptorchidism, trauma or exogenous maternal estrogen (in utero) may be associated with its development (4,7,10). Immunohistochemical markers are critical to exclude other intratesticular spindle cell sarcomas and germ cell tumors that also present with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Rhabdomyosarcoma exhibit positivity for smooth muscle actin, muscle-specific actin, S-100, and vimentin and negative for cytokeratine on immunohistochemical staining (12). Scrotal ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography imaging may be used to determine a intatesticular or paratesticular pathology (13).

RMS occurs predominantly in the head and neck, the genitourinary tract and the extremities. RMS of the bladder and paratesticular organs accounts for the majority of such tumors located in the genitourinary tract system, while they are rarely identified in the testes. Only 18 cases describing primary ITRMSs and 6 cases reporting metastatic ITRMSs are currently documented in the literature (212,1418). These primary and metastatic ITRMSs typically affected only a single testis, with the exception of a single case with bilateral testicular involvement of metastatic ITRMS (14). Metastatic ITRMSs are secondary to RMSs of the extremities and maxillary sinus, with all cases presenting as alveolar type (1418).

The clinical features of the present case, amongst 18 other cases of primary ITRMS sourced from the literature, are summarized in Table I (212). The median age of the patients at presentation was 20 years (range, 3 months to 41 years). All patients presented with a single, slow-growing, painless testicular mass. A total of 9 tumors developed in the left testis and 10 occurred in the right. The median medical history of the 12 patients with such data was 3 months (range, 1–24 months), prior to seeking medical advice. The median size of the primary tumors of the relevant 14 cases was 7.5 cm (range, 3.7–15 cm). For the histological subtypes, embryonal RMS accounted for 73.7% (14/19) of cases, pleomorphic RMS for 15.8% (3/19) of cases and alveolar RMS for 5.3% (1/19) of cases, while 1 case presented with undetermined RMS. Among them, 2 patients were diagnosed initially by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the testis, confirmed by post-RIO histological sections. To determine staging information, FNAB was performed on the RPLN of 1 patient in whom there was difficulty in performing a complete excision. During the initial imaging investigations prior to RIO, 4 patients presented with evidence of RPLN metastasis and 2 patients with distant metastasis. Furthermore, 5 cases developed a novel metastatic lesion, with locations that included the lungs, the bones, the chest cavity or the local lymph nodes, ranging from 3 weeks to 17 months after RIO was conducted. RIO was mandatory in all patients in the present cohort as the initial treatment, and a total of 12 cases received post-RIO adjunctive chemotherapy. CR was observed in 50% (6/12) of cases, PR in 33.3% (4/12) of cases and disease progression in 16.7% (2/12) of cases. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) was performed in 3 patients presenting with RPLN metastasis and in 4 patients without evidence of metastasis for staging (2,11). The median duration of follow-up of the 17 cases with data was 22 months (range, 3–96 months), including 1 patient who was lost to follow-up 26 months after RIO, and 2 patients who succumbed at 18 and 20 months, respectively, following RIO, who presented with distant metastasis. A further 14 patients were reported as alive when the corresponding literature was published, with 11 cases described as disease-free and 3 patients living with RPLN or distant metastasis.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients with intratesticular RMS.

Table I.

Characteristics of patients with intratesticular RMS.

First author/s, year (ref.)Age, yearsMH, monthsSPT, cmHTLocationSurgeryIRSGChemotherapy and responseOutcome, last follow-up in months
Liu et al, 2011 (2)23NS10eRMSRPLNRIO + FNABIIICRAlive with pelvic LN, 51
17NS  6eRMSRPLNRIO + RPLNDIICRAlive, 19
23NS  5pRMSNoneRIO + RPLNDINAAlive, 22
20NS10eRMSRPLN + lungRIO + RPLND+RPLIVPRAlive, 36
19NS  8eRMSLSN, lung + boneRIOIVPRLost to follow-up with residual tumor, 26
21NS12eRMSRPLNRIO + RPLNDIICRAlive, 12
Kumar et al, 1994 (3)41  3NSeRMSNoneRIO + FNABINANS
  5  1NSeRMSNoneRIO + FNABINANS
Banfield and Brookstein, 1995 (4)26  515uRMSNoneRIOINAAlive, 8
Alexander, 1968 (5)2.5  3NSpRMSNoneRIONSNAAlive, 96
0.25  1NSaRMSNoneRIONSNAAlive, 60
Nasit et al, 2013 (6)  2  2  5pRMSNoneRIOIPDMulti-metastasis, 16; succumbed, 20
Thompson et al, 1997 (7)3124  7eRMSNoneRIO + RPLNDIPDMulti-metastasis, 16; succumbed, 18
Chung et al, 2007 (8)0.75  93.7eRMSNoneRIOICRAlive, 24
Kelly et al, 2011 (9)33  211eRMSNoneRIOINAAlive, 3
Terrier-Lacombe et al, 1990 (10)21NS  7eRMSNoneRIO + RPLND + LILNDIPRMulti-metastasis, 17 alive, 20
Jungling and Culp, 1975 (11)17  3NSeRMSNoneRIO + RPLNDICRLung metastasis; alive, 96
Erbay et al, 2004 (12)20  14.6eRMSNoneRIOICRAlive, 24
Present study141214eRMSNoneRIOIVPRAlive, 8

[i] MH, medical history; SPT, (mean) size of primary tumor; location, location of metastases; HT, histological type; IRSG, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group; NS, not stated; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma, uRMS, undetermined RMS; pRMS, pleomorphic RMS; eRMS, embryonic RMS; aRMS, alveolar RMS; RIO, radical inguinal orchiectomy; RPLND, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; LSN, left supraclavicular nodes; FNAB, fine-needle aspiration biopsy; RPL, right pulmonary lobectomy; LILND, left inguinal lymph node dissection; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; PD, progressive disease; NA, not available.

Unlike other germ cell tumors that develop in the testes, tumor markers in ITRMS, including AFP, β-HCG and LDH, are typically within the normal ranges. An exception to this in the present literature review was AFP, which was slightly elevated in 2 cases that developed teratoma (4,10). Ultrasound is the most prevalently used imaging technique to examine the testicular mass and adjacent organ. Gross appearance, histopathology and immunohistochemical staining may aid the final diagnosis and distinguish ITRMS from paratesticular or spermatic cord RMS (19). ITRMS is a highly aggressive tumor that may be present with early metastasis (6). X-ray or CT of the chest and abdominopelvic cavity are typically performed to identify whether metastasis has occurred. As a novel iconography approach, PET-CT not only presents detailed functional and metabolic molecular information, but also provides a precise, anatomical localization of lesions (20). PET-CT is widely used to investigate various types of tumors, but has rarely been reported in the evaluation of metastatic lesions of ITRMS (21). The technique may be more sensitive for minimal metastatic lesions and may have a potential impact on tumor staging and treatment planning.

Multidisciplinary treatment approaches have greatly improved the prognosis of RMS (22). RIO, as an initial treatment of ITRMS, is mandatory for all patients, and may therefore serve an important role in the pathological diagnosis and treatment of the disease. RIO, followed by chemotherapy, appears to be the optimal treatment for ITRMS (2). Chemotherapy is generally effective in treating RMS, and the recommended chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of IRSG is VAC, consisting of vincristine, actinomycin D and cyclophosphamide (9). In the present literature review, 6 cases chose the VAC regimen and 4 cases chose the VA regimen (2,6,8,10,11). Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been tested in clinical trials. Controversy remains over whether RPLND should be performed as a routine staging procedure following RIO, or as an initial treatment (2). However, it may serve a role in debunking disease when positive nodes persist following chemotherapy. Regarding RMS, radiotherapy is recommended for patients presenting with an unresectable tumor, a post-operative residual tumor, local recurrence, distant metastasis and an unfavorable histology, including alveolar RMS (2). However, as chemotherapy is generally effective in treating patients with RMS, the concept of radiotherapy use has been partially modified and it is recommended on an individual basis (2,9). In adult RMS of the prostate or bladder, adjuvant radiotherapy is not regarded as necessary when the patient has undergone complete surgical resection and chemotherapy (23,24). In the present literature review, no patients received radiotherapy for the treatment of primary ITRMS.

Multiple factors have been demonstrated to affect the prognosis of RMS; these primarily consist of the histological subtype, patient age, tumor size, resectability, lymph nodal involvement and local recurrence (9). There is limited long-term data available regarding the prognosis of ITRMS; the disease is typically believed to present with a poor prognosis, however, it is not as poor as the prognosis associated with paratesticular RMS (25).

Despite ITRMS occurring in rare instances, clinicians should be aware of this possibility, with prompt investigation required of any unilateral, painless, testicular mass. ITRMS is extremely aggressive and develops rapidly, with metastasis often occurring within a 2-year period (2). Therefore, an early diagnosis and the regular monitoring of metastatic lesions are key factors that may improve patient prognosis. PET-CT is a sensitive tool for accurately determining the response to therapy, particularly the occurrence of CR (2,9). Multidisciplinary treatment, specifically RIO followed by chemotherapy, serves a significant role in the treatment of ITRMS (8). The patient described in the current study presented with a large primary ITRMS, underwent a full evaluation, received the appropriate treatment and subsequently achieved a positive prognosis. This case demonstrates that primary ITRMS has an improved prognosis when compared with RMS located at other sites, and that multidisciplinary treatment may further improve the patient outcome. However, future prospective studies are required in order to acquire an increased understanding of this rare disease.

References

1 

Dagher R and Helman L: Rhabdomyosarcoma: An overview. Oncologist. 4:34–44. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Liu ZW, Zhang XQ, Hou GL, Zhang ZL, Qin ZK, Han H and Zhou FJ: Primary adult intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma, Results of the treatment of six cases. Int J Urol. 18:171–174. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Kumar PV, Kazemi H and Khezri A: Testicular embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Histopathology. Acta Cytol. 38:573–576. 1994.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Banfield GK and Brookstein R: Rhabdomyosarcoma arising in teratoma of the testis. J R Army Med Corps. 141:167–168. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Alexander F: Pure testicular rhabdomyosarcoma. Br J Cancer. 22:498–501. 1968. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Nasit JG, Parikh B, Trivedi P and Shah M: Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatrics. Indian J Urol. 29:77–79. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Thompson KS, Jensen JD, Bhoopalam N and Reyes CV: Pleural effusion cytology of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 16:270–273. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Chung JM, Lim YT and Lee SD: Infantile testicular rhabdomyosarcoma. Urology. 69:1208.e13–1208.e15. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Kelly B, Lundon D, Rowaiye B, Daly P and Walsh K: Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the testis. Can Urol Assoc J. 5:E7–E10. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Martinez-Madrigal F, Porta W, Rahal J and Droz JP: Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma arising in a mature teratoma of the testis, A case report. J Urol. 143:1232–1234. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jungling MJ and Culp DA: Case report of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the testis with an 8-year survival. J Urol. 114:313–315. 1975.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Erbay ME, Tarhan F, Barişik NO and Kuyumcuoğlu U: A case of testicular rhabdomyosarcoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 36:73–75. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Singh R, Chandra A and O'Brien TS: Primary intratesticular leiomyosarcoma in a mixed race man A case report. J Clin Pathol. 57:1319–1320. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ayati M, Izadpanahi MM, Nowroozi MR, Soroush Z, Jamshidian H and Rakhshani N: First case report of bilateral metastatic intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Urology. 75:1485–1487. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Cannon GM Jr, Polsky EG and Bellinger MF: Metastatic intratesticular alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma discovered after induction of systemic chemotherapy. Urology. 69:982.e13–982.e15. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Medioni J, Fernandez-Bruno P, Meignin V, Bourrier P, Laurence V, Ramdani M, Dupuy-Grasset M and Cottu P: Testicular metastasis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, Clinical case of a 19-year-old man. Prog Urol. 13:700–702. 2003.(In French). PubMed/NCBI

17 

Bouvier DP, Fox CW Jr, Frishberg DP, Kozakowski M and Cobos E: A solitary testicular relapse of a rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult. Cancer. 65:2611–2614. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Gow KW, Murphy JJ III, Wu JK and Desa DJ: Metastatic testicular rhabdomyosarcoma - a report of two cases. J Pediatr Surg. 38:E1–E3. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Shimamoto K, Tanji N, Ozaw A, Sasaki T, Ikeda T, Iseda T and Yokoyama M: Intrascrotal rhabdomyosarcoma in adult, A case report. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 100:545–549. 2009.(In Japanese). PubMed/NCBI

20 

Evens AM and Kostakoglu L: The role of FDG-PET in defining prognosis of Hodgkin lymphoma for early-stage disease. Blood. 124:3356–3364. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Maffione AM, Marzola MC, Capirci C, Colletti PM and Rubello D: Value of (18)F-FDG PET for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer, Systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204:1261–1268. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Meyer WH and Spunt SL: Soft tissue sarcomas of childhood. Cancer Treat Rev. 30:269–280. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sexton WJ, Lance RE, Reyes AO, Pisters PW, Tu SM and Pisters LL: Adult prostate sarcoma, The M. Histopathology. J Urol. 166:521–525. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Spiess PE, Kassouf W, Steinberg JR, Tuziak T, Hernandez M, Tibbs RF, Czerniak B, Kamat AM, Dinney CP and Grossman HB: Review of the M.D. Histopathology. Urol Oncol. 25:38–45. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Stewart LH, Lioe TF and Johnston SR: Thirty-year review of intrascrotal rhabdomyosarcoma. Br J Urol. 68:418–420. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 11 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yi J, Zhou DA, Huo JR, Wang YH and Ma JA: Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review. Oncol Lett 11: 1016-1020, 2016
APA
Yi, J., Zhou, D., Huo, J., Wang, Y., & Ma, J. (2016). Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review. Oncology Letters, 11, 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3987
MLA
Yi, J., Zhou, D., Huo, J., Wang, Y., Ma, J."Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review". Oncology Letters 11.2 (2016): 1016-1020.
Chicago
Yi, J., Zhou, D., Huo, J., Wang, Y., Ma, J."Primary intratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: A case report and literature review". Oncology Letters 11, no. 2 (2016): 1016-1020. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3987