Open Access

A persistent high neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection

  • Authors:
    • Meiqi Cui
    • Rui Xu
    • Bing Yan
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 9, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2133
  • Article Number: 63
  • Copyright: © Cui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The prognostic role of the neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, its variation and corresponding predicative value in patients undergoing resection remain largely unknown. In the present study, data from 146 patients with CRC were retrospectively collected, optimal cut‑off points for preoperative and postoperative low and high NLRs were set, and ΔNLR was calculated. Subsequently, patients were classified into low‑low, low‑high, high‑low and high‑high subgroups based on the cut‑off points, and their progression‑free survival (PFS) was determined. A Cox proportional hazard model was applied to calculate the prognostic value of all factors. The results demonstrated that both preoperative and postoperative NLRs (pre‑NLR and post‑NLR) but not ΔNLR could predict PFS with optimal cut‑off points of 2.39 and 2.96, respectively. For predicting PFS, the pre‑NLR had a sensitivity and specificity of 48.80 and 79.50%, respectively, and the post‑NLR had a sensitivity and specificity of 63.20 and 56.20%, respectively. Significant differences were identified between low and high pre‑NLRs in terms of histological grade (P<0.01) and tumor diameter (P<0.01); however, such differences were only found in terms of age (P<0.01) for low and high post‑NLRs. The PFS of patients in the low‑low, low‑high, high‑low and high‑high subgroups was 50.30±21.36, 43.67±22.78, 31.06±25.56 and 29.87±24.13 months, respectively, and patients in the high‑high subgroup had the worst PFS (P<0.01). Preoperative CEA level, invasive depth, node involvement, distant metastasis and preoperative NLR were independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, a persistently high NLR for patients with CRC undergoing resection was associated with poor prognosis.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) still ranks as one of the leading causes of death for humans, and people are being diagnosed at a younger age (1). Until recently, the search for reliable, inexpensive, and readily available factors that could aid in precise prognostic prediction for patients was underappreciated.

The relationship between cancer and the host inflammatory response has been extensively studied (2,3), and markers of this response have independent prognostic value in patients with a variety of malignancies. It has long been established that cell fractions from peripheral blood, such as neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets, as well as their ratios, can reflect systematic inflammatory responses, and such values have been applied for prognostic prediction in many malignancies, including lung (4), breast (5), pancreatic (6), and gastric (7) cancers and CRC (8-11). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), which is defined as the ratio of the neutrophil count to the lymphocyte count, has been extensively studied and found to be highly superior when compared to other parameters, such as the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, in CRC (12,13). In a systematic review by Malietzis et al (14), a high NLR was found to be associated with significant survival disadvantages with either resection or palliative chemotherapy; an additional two similar systematic reviews supported these results (15,16). Nonetheless, studies have indicated that treatment approaches could affect the counts of neutrophils and lymphocytes (17); in addition, it has been suggested that longitudinal tests of the NLR would be more meaningful for individual patients. However, such reports are still rare.

In this study, we aimed to explore the longitudinal prognostic value of the NLR in patients undergoing resection.

Patients and methods

Patient enrollment

From January 2011 to September 22, 2014, 146 surgically treated cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma (according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging) were retrospectively collected at Hainan Hospital of the PLA General Hospital. Patients with the following criteria were excluded: i) Age <18 years old; ii) multiple or recurrent malignancies or in situ lesions; iii) a history of previous neoadjuvant therapy; iv) comorbidities with a long-term history of medication use such as hormones; v) detectable complications with an elevated white blood cells beyond the upper limit of the reference (4-10x109/l) including infection, obstruction or acute bleeding before and after the surgery; and vi) the absence of a follow-up date. Clinicopathological parameters, including sex, age, and the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, were collected before the surgery. In addition, pathological reports for tumor location, histological grade, invasive depth and tumor diameter (cut-off 4 cm) (18) were registered. The postoperative adjuvant therapies were checked. The study followed the Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (19), was supervised by the ethics committee of Hainan Hospital of the PLA General Hospital (approved ID: 301HLFYLL15), and written informed consent was not obtained because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Determination of the preoperative and postoperative NLR (pre-NLR/post-NLR)

Routine laboratory tests were performed between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. using peripheral venous blood within 1 month before (preoperative) and at least 7 days after (postoperative) the surgery. The NLR and ΔNLR were calculated as previously reported (20).

Follow-up procedure and definition of progression-free survival (PFS)

The follow-up meetings were conducted by telephone or a visit to the medical records department of the hospital, with intervals of 3-6 months for the first 3 years and 6-12 months for the next 4-5 years. PFS was defined as the interval between the date of operation until the date of first recurrence or death from any cause. The primary study endpoint was the 3-year PFS, as used in a previous study (21), and the last follow-up point occurred in September 2019.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc.). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of the pre-NLR/post-NLR for PFS, and the relationships with other clinicopathological parameters were calculated by the χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, or the Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate. Further classification of pre/post-NLR into low-low, low-high, high-low and high-high subgroups was conducted. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves were applied to compare patients with a low or high NLR before and after the surgery, and significant differences were determined by the log-rank test. Correlation of preoperative and postoperative neutrophil or lymphocyte counts with the NLR or ΔNLR was conducted by Pearson correlation analysis. Finally, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted by using the Cox proportional hazards model (22). A double-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics and the differences in NLR across various clinicopathological parameters

In total, 50 female and 96 male patients were included in the study, and the mean age of the patients was 56.68 years (range: 24-85 years), with a median follow-up time of 41.77 months (range: 1-81 months). As shown in Fig. 1, statistical significance was found regarding the pre/post-NLR predicting the PFS but not the ΔNLR. According to the Youden index, the optimal cut-off values for the pre/post-NLR were 2.39 and 2.96, respectively. For predicting PFS, the pre-NLR had a sensitivity and specificity of 48.80 and 79.50%, respectively, and the post-NLR had a sensitivity and specificity of 63.20 and 56.20%, respectively. Based on these points, patients were then categorized into pre-NLR low or high (<2.39, n=99 or ≥2.39, n=47, respectively) or post-NLR low or high (<2.96, n=70 or ≥2.96, n=76, respectively) subgroups. For the pre-NLR, significant differences were found across various histological grades and tumor diameters; however, for the post-NLR, differences were found only across different ages (Table I).

Table I

Differences in pre-/post-operative NLR for different clinicopathological parameters.

Table I

Differences in pre-/post-operative NLR for different clinicopathological parameters.

 Pre-operative NLRPost-operative NLR
VariableLow, nHigh, nP-valueLow, nHigh, nP-value
Age, years  0.06  <0.01
     <604326 4029 
     ≥605621 3047 
Sex  0.27  0.63
     Female3614 2327 
     Male6333 4749 
Tumor location  0.80  0.71
     Right2613 1821 
     Left7334 5255 
Histological grade  <0.01  0.07
     Well22 13 
     Moderate8332 5956 
     Poor148 1017 
CEA level  0.24  0.76
     Normal6427 4348 
     Elevated3520 2728 
Invasive depth  0.10  0.13
     T1+2237 1713 
     T3+47640 5313 
Tumor diameter, cm  <0.01  0.63
     <4419 2327 
     ≥45839 4749 
Node involvement  0.17  0.30
     N05924 4141 
     N1+24023 2835 
Positive nodes numbera1.87±3.503.00±6.120.251.90±3.542.54±5.280.50
Distant metastasis  0.11  0.06
     M09241 6667 
     M176 49 
TNM stages  0.48  0.75
     I+II5725 4042 
     III+IV4222 3034 
Adjuvant therapies  <0.01  0.11
     Received5435 4643 
     None4512 2433 

[i] aData are presented as mean ± SD. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

PFS prediction value of the pre/post-NLR

According to K-M analyses, we then examined the PFS prediction value in different pre/post-NLRs. As shown in Fig. 2, patients with a high NLR had inferior PFS both preoperatively and postoperatively. The PFS in the low vs. high NLR groups was 47.22±22.22 vs. 30.30±24.52 months preoperatively and 45.64±23.84 vs. 38.22±24.21 months postoperatively (both P<0.01). After subgroup classification, the PFS for patients in the low-low (n=53), low-high (n=17), high-low (n=46), and high-high (n=30) subgroups was 50.30±21.36, 43.67±22.78, 31.06±25.56 and 29.87±24.13 months, respectively, and those in the high-high subgroup displayed the worst PFS. Compared to patients in the high-low and high-high subgroups, patients in the low-low and low-high subgroups had significantly better PFS.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for the factors correlated with PFS

As shown in Table II, according to the univariate tests, the preoperative CEA level, invasive depth, node involvement, positive node number, distant metastasis, TNM stages, adjuvant therapies and NLR (both preoperative and postoperative) correlated with PFS. When P<0.05 was used as a cut-off in multivariate analysis, the preoperative CEA level, invasive depth, node involvement, distant metastasis and pre-NLR were found to be significantly correlated with PFS.

Table II

Univariable and multivariable analysis of different parameters for progression-free survival in the patients.

Table II

Univariable and multivariable analysis of different parameters for progression-free survival in the patients.

 UnivariableMultivariable
VariableP-valueHR95% CIP-valueHR95% CI
Age, years      
     <60Ref.     
     ≥600.551.180.70-1.99   
Sex      
     FemaleRef.     
     Male0.940.980.56-1.70   
Tumor location      
     RightRef.     
     Left0.301.400.74-2.65   
Histological grade      
     WellRef.     
     Moderate + poor0.430.790.44-1.42   
CEA level      
     NormalRef.  Ref.  
     Elevated<0.013.492.05-5.95<0.012.771.58-4.85
Invasive depth      
     T1+2Ref.     
     T3+4<0.015.811.81-18.58   
Tumor diameter, cm      
     <4Ref.     
     ≥40.191.480.83-2.63   
Node involvement      
     N0Ref.  Ref.  
     N1+2<0.013.011.75-5.16<0.012.401.38-4.18
Positive nodes number<0.011.131.08-1.17   
Distant metastasis      
     M0Ref.  Ref.  
     M1<0.017.473.86-14.45<0.013.561.78-7.11
TNM stages      
     I + IIRef.     
     III + IV<0.013.131.81-5.41   
Adjuvant therapies      
     ReceivedRef.     
     None0.020.480.27-0.87   
Preoperative NLR      
     <2.39Ref.  Ref.  
     ≥2.39<0.012.811.66-4.74<0.012.781.61-4.79
Postoperative NLR      
     <2.96Ref.     
     ≥2.960.041.751.02-3.00   

[i] CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

Discussion

In this study, we found that a high NLR, either preoperative or postoperative, was associated with poor prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and that the ΔNLR was less likely to be involved. Overall, patients with a low pre-NLR had different prognoses after surgery, and a significantly prolonged PFS was found in those in the low-low subgroup compared to that in patients in the low-high subgroup; in contrast, patients with a persistently high NLR had poor PFS even if the prognosis changed after the surgery.

It has long been established that a high pretreatment NLR is associated with poor prognosis in CRC, but debates are still unresolved concerning the optimal cut-off points, and there is heterogeneity in the pathological stages used across study samples. In a curative scenario, Malietzis et al (23). studied 506 nonmetastatic patients at a cut-off point of 3 and found that a high NLR was correlated with some negative factors, including older age, higher T and N stages and microvascular invasion, but a high NLR was only an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and not overall survival (OS). Choi et al (12) performed a study with 549 cases with a cut-off point of 2.6 and found a similar association of a high NLR with older age; they also found that a high NLR was linked to reduced recurrence-free survival. In our study, we identified a high pre-NLR cut-off value of 2.39, which was close to that identified in previous results (24,25). Moreover, this point was maintained even when stage IV disease was excluded (but with different AUC values, data not shown).

The underlying explanation for the association of the pretreatment NLR with the prognosis of CRC remains largely unclear, but part of the reason is that the roles of neutrophils and lymphocytes in cancer are highly complex (26,27). Previous studies have indicated that a high NLR is associated with increased levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-2Ra, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF) (28-30). Some of these cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-8, play an important role in cancer progression and treatment resistance (28-30). Additionally, a recent study indicated that cancer dissemination can occur at a very early stage in CRC (31); in such a scenario, these early metastatic seeds could also contribute to the high NLR by triggering systemic inflammation. Based on these results, it is plausible that patients with a high NLR-related cytokine profile have cancer cells with specific characteristics, such as enhanced progression or proliferation, which could result in a poor prognosis.

Notably, it has been suggested that longitudinal tests of the NLR are more meaningful for individual patients with CRC; however, related reports are rare. Guo et al (20) explored the prognostic role of the pre-NLR and ΔNLR in 135 patients with CRC and found that both the pre-NLR and ΔNLR were independent factors for OS but not DFS, but the role of the post-NLR was not elucidated. Guthrie et al (32) conducted a study with 206 patients and found that a high pre-NLR and high post-NLR were associated with poor CSS, but only the pre-NLR was an independent prognostic factor. Our results are in line with the study (32). Nonetheless, the post-NLR was previously reported to be an important prognostic factor in many cancers, including gastric cancer (33), hepatocellular carcinoma (34), renal cell carcinoma (35) and CRC (36), but it was noted that it could be affected by many factors. For example, a relatively high post-NLR was associated with surgery-related stress. Stress induced by psychological stressors such as surgery can lead to a high concentration of corticosteroids (37), which can increase neutrophils and impair the functions of lymphocytes (37,38). In contrast, a relatively low post-NLR could be found in patients who underwent adjuvant or first-line chemotherapy (39,40). In our study, patients with a low pre-NLR who shifted to a high post-NLR could present an obviously inferior prognosis when compared to those who maintained a low post-NLR, based on the aforementioned evidence (31,37,38), it is plausible that surgery for these patients could induce a high post-NLR, which could facilitate the outbreak of early micrometastases and the germination of new lesions.

This study has many limitations: First, patients were divided into four sub-groups according to the optimal cut-off points as it was reported in previous studies (41,42), although some other studies reported different taxonomy (43,44), however, the meaning of such classification was greatly attenuated due to the limited sample size in these sub-groups and could result in biased conclusions; second, data relating to other important prognostic factors such as microsatellite instability were not available; and third, more prolonged tests of the post-NLR as well as follow-up would have been required to validate the role of the NLR for the patients.

Overall, our study indicated that a high pre-NLR and high post-NLR predict poor prognosis for patients with colorectal cancer; patients who maintained a low NLR had much better survival.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Medical and Health Science Innovation Project of Sanya (grant nos. 2018YW06 and 2016YW08), the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81503391) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of Hainan (grant no. 817352).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

BY conceived and designed the study. MC, RX and BY acquired the data. BY analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. MC, RX and BY performed critical revision of the manuscript. BY supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hainan Branch of PLA General Hospital (approval no. 301HLFYLL15). Written informed consent was not obtained due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RGS, Barzi A and Jemal A: Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:177–193. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC and Clarke SJ: Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 15:e493–e503. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Inagaki N, Kibata K, Tamaki T, Shimizu T and Nomura S: Prognostic impact of the mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio in terms of survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 83:97–101. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Takeuchi H, Abe M, Takumi Y, Hashimoto T, Kobayashi R, Osoegawa A, Miyawaki M, Okamoto T and Sugio K: The prognostic impact of the platelet distribution width-to-platelet count ratio in patients with breast cancer. PLoS One. 12(e0189166)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

An X, Ding PR, Li YH, Wang FH, Shi YX, Wang ZQ, He YJ, Xu RH and Jiang WQ: Elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Biomarkers. 15:516–522. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Murakami Y, Saito H, Shimizu S, Kono Y, Shishido Y, Miyatani K, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y and Fujiwara Y: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 39:2583–2589. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Iwasaki Y and Kubota K: Combination of platelet count and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a useful predictor of postoperative survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 109:401–407. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Stojkovic Lalosevic M, Pavlovic Markovic A, Stankovic S, Stojkovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Radoman Vujacic I, Lalic D, Milovanovic T, Dumic I and Krivokapic Z: Combined diagnostic efficacy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) as biomarkers of systemic inflammation in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Dis Markers. 2019(6036979)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Milasiene V, Stratilatovas E, Norkiene V and Jonusauskaite R: Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood as prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. J Buon. 10:261–264. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ozawa T, Ishihara S, Kawai K, Kazama S, Yamaguchi H, Sunami E, Kitayama J and Watanabe T: Impact of a lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in stage IV colorectal cancer. J Sur Res. 199:386–392. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Choi WJ, Cleghorn MC, Jiang H, Jackson TD, Okrainec A and Quereshy FA: Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a better prognostic serum biomarker than platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing resection for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 22 (Suppl 3):S603–S613. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Song Y, Yang Y, Gao P, Chen X, Yu D, Xu Y, Zhao J and Wang Z: The preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a superior indicator of prognosis compared with other inflammatory biomarkers in resectable colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 17(744)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Malietzis G, Giacometti M, Kennedy RH, Athanasiou T, Aziz O and Jenkins JT: The emerging role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in determining colorectal cancer treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:3938–3946. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Li MX, Liu XM, Zhang XF, Zhang JF, Wang WL, Zhu Y, Dong J, Cheng JW, Liu ZW, Ma L and Lv Y: Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 134:2403–2413. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Li H, Zhao Y and Zheng F: Prognostic significance of elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for patients with colorectal cancer undergoing curative surgery: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 98(e14126)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Chu-Yuan H, Jing P, Yi-Sheng W, He-Ping P, Hui Y, Chu-Xiong Z, Guo-Jian L and Guo-Qiang W: The impact of chemotherapy-associated neutrophil/lymphocyte counts on prognosis of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 13(177)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Santullo F, Biondi A, Cananzi FCM, Fico V, Tirelli F, Ricci R, Rizzo G, Coco C, Mattana C, D'Ugo D, et al: Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with stage IIa colon cancer. Am J Surg. 15:71–77. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M and Clark GM: Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (remark). J Natl Cancer Inst. 97:1180–1184. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Guo D, Han A, Jing W, Chen D, Jin F, Li M, Kong L and Yu J: Preoperative to postoperative change in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict survival in colorectal cancer patients. Future Oncol. 14:1187–1196. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Haller DG, Gray R, Benedetti JK, Buyse M, Labianca R, Seitz JF, O'Callaghan CJ, Francini G, et al: Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: Individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 23:8664–8670. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Xing X, Guo J, Wen X, Ding G, Li B, Dong B, Feng Q, Li S, Zhang J, Cheng X, et al: Analysis of PD1, PDL1, PDL2 expression and T cells infiltration in 1014 gastric cancer patients. Oncoimmunology. 7(e1356144)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Malietzis G, Giacometti M, Askari A, Nachiappan S, Kennedy RH, Faiz OD, Aziz O and Jenkins JT: A preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 predicts disease-free survival after curative elective colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 260:287–292. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Ozdemir Y, Akin ML, Sucullu I, Balta AZ and Yucel E: Pretreatment neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic aid in colorectal cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 15:2647–2650. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Shibutani M, Maeda K, Nagahara H, Noda E, Ohtani H, Nishiguchi Y and Hirakawa K: A high preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 33:3291–3294. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

26 

Coffelt SB, Wellenstein MD and de Visser KE: Neutrophils in cancer: Neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer. 16:431–446. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Grivennikov SI, Greten FR and Karin M: Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 140:883–899. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Crusz SM and Balkwill FR: Inflammation and cancer: Advances and new agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 12:584–596. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Zhang X, Hu F, Li G, Li G, Yang X, Liu L, Zhang R, Zhang B and Feng Y: Human colorectal cancer-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote colorectal cancer progression through IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Cell Death Dis. 9(25)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Zhai J, Shen J, Xie G, Wu J, He M, Gao L, Zhang Y, Yao X and Shen L: Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived IL-8 mediates resistance to cisplatin in human gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 454:37–43. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Hu Z, Ding J, Ma Z, Sun R, Seoane JA, Scott Shaffer J, Suarez CJ, Berghoff AS, Cremolini C, Falcone A, et al: Quantitative evidence for early metastatic seeding in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 51:1113–1122. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Guthrie GJ, Roxburgh CS, Farhan-Alanie OM, Horgan PG and McMillan DC: Comparison of the prognostic value of longitudinal measurements of systemic inflammation in patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 109:24–28. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Min KW, Kwon MJ, Kim DH, Son BK, Kim EK, Oh YH and Wi YC: Persistent elevation of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A better predictor of survival in gastric cancer than elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Sci Rep. 7(13967)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Dan J, Zhang Y, Peng Z, Huang J, Gao H, Xu L and Chen M: Postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio change predicts survival of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation. PLoS One. 8(e58184)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Gondo T, Hatano T and Tachibana M: Followup of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and recurrence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 187:411–417. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Li Z, Zhao R, Cui Y, Zhou Y and Wu X: The dynamic change of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcome in stage I-III colon cancer. Sci Rep. 8(9453)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Reiche EM, Nunes SO and Morimoto HK: Stress, depression, the immune system, and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 5:617–625. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Fukakusa M, Bergeron C, Tulic MK, Fiset PO, Al Dewachi O, Laviolette M, Hamid Q and Chakir J: Oral corticosteroids decrease eosinophil and CC chemokine expression but increase neutrophil, IL-8, and IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 expression in asthmatic airway mucosa. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 115:280–286. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Yoshino T, Cleary JM, Van Cutsem E, Mayer RJ, Ohtsu A, Shinozaki E, Falcone A, Yamazaki K, Nishina T, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al: Neutropenia and survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in the RECOURSE and J003 trials. Ann Oncol. 31:88–95. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Wu J, Ge XX, Zhu W, Zhi Q, Xu MD, Duan W, Chen K, Gong FR, Tao M, Shou LM, et al: Values of applying white blood cell counts in the prognostic evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep. 19:2330–2340. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Lin GN, Liu PP, Liu DY, Peng JW, Xiao JJ and Xia ZJ: Prognostic significance of the pre-chemotherapy lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. Chin J Cancer. 35(5)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Lin JX, Wang ZK, Huang YQ, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, et al: Dynamic changes in pre- and postoperative levels of inflammatory markers and their effects on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg: Feb 3, 2020 (Epub ahead of print).

43 

Miyatani K, Saito H, Kono Y, Murakami Y, Kuroda H, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Ashida K and Fujiwara Y: Combined analysis of the pre- and postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Today. 48:300–307. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Yamamoto M, Saito H, Uejima C, Tanio A, Takaya S, Ashida K and Fujiwara Y: Combined pre- and postoperative lymphocyte count accurately predicts outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. Dig Surg. 36:487–494. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2020
Volume 13 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Cui M, Xu R and Yan B: A persistent high neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection. Mol Clin Oncol 13: 63, 2020
APA
Cui, M., Xu, R., & Yan, B. (2020). A persistent high neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 13, 63. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2133
MLA
Cui, M., Xu, R., Yan, B."A persistent high neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 13.5 (2020): 63.
Chicago
Cui, M., Xu, R., Yan, B."A persistent high neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 13, no. 5 (2020): 63. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2133