MicroRNAs are involved in cervical cancer development, progression, clinical outcome and improvement treatment response (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Víctor González-Quintana
    • Lizbeth Palma-Berré
    • Alma D. Campos-Parra
    • Eduardo López‑Urrutia
    • Oscar Peralta-Zaragoza
    • Rafael Vazquez-Romo
    • Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 30, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4369
  • Pages: 3-12
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is the third most diagnosed cancer among females worldwide and the fourth cause of cancer‑related mortality. Prophylactic HPV vaccines and traditional pap-smear screening are undoubtedly capable of decreasing the incidence and mortality of CC. However, a large number of females succumb to the disease each year due to late diagnosis and resistance to conventional treatments. Thus, it is necessary to identify new molecular markers to predict the clinical outcome and to design powerful treatments. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression and are involved in the modulation of several cell pathways associated with progression from pre-malignant to invasive and metastatic disease, increasing tumor malignancy. The aim of this review was to summarize the recent data that describe the important role of miRNAS involved in CC in order to determine their potential as prognostic biomarkers and as therapy targets. Studies of >40 miRNAs with roles in cancer regulation were identified. We also identified 17 miRNAs associated with progression, 12 involved with clinical outcome and 7 that improved CC treatment response. The present review is expected to broaden understanding of the functional role and potential clinical uses of miRNAs in CC.

1. Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) is the third most common malignancy among females worldwide, with a global incidence of >500,000 diagnosed new cases and ~260,000 mortalities each year (1). Over 85% of the CC global burden occurs in developing countries, where it represents ~13% of all types of cancer of female patients. Higher incidence regions include Eastern and Western Africa (>30 cases/100,000 inhabitants), Southern Africa (26.8/100,000 inhabitants), South-Central Asia (24.6/100,000 inhabitants), and South America and Middle Africa (23.9 and 23.0/100,000 inhabitants, respectively). Cervical cancer remains the most common cancer among females only in Eastern Africa, South-Central Asia and Melanesia (1,2). In Latin America, the mortality rates in the region are seven-fold greater than those in North America, with an estimated 72,000 new cases of cervical cancer and 33,000 mortalities that occur annually (3).

Conventional treatment of CC patients involves surgery and chemoradiotherapy, although radical hysterectomy is employed in early stages. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) are usually treated with radiotherapy in combination with cis-platinum (4,5). Nevertheless, ~50% of patients present with recurrent or persistent disease, which may be explained by the presence of therapy-resistant cells inside the tumor mass.

Despite advances in our understanding of this neoplasm, the absence of predictive conventional treatment response markers and the lack of alternative treatments hamper CC personalized treatment. Thus, it is imperative to understand the biology of this tumor, by analyzing its molecular dynamics as well as the clinical characteristics of CC patients in order to improve the outcome.

MicroRNAs or miRNAs are small (21–23 nucleotide long) endogenous, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs that control gene expression by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of messenger RNA (mRNA), leading to mRNA degradation or protein translation inhibition (6,7). Over 1,000 miRNAs are present in the human genome, each of which potentially regulates hundreds of mRNAs. Approximately 60% of all protein-coding genes are potentially regulated by miRNAs, which confers them a fundamental role in the modulation of numerous cell processes (8,9). MicroRNAs with altered expression patterns have been found to have oncogenic (oncomirs) or tumor-suppressing (anti-oncomirs) functions present in the pathogenesis of most malignancies. In the canonical model, oncomirs are upregulated and anti-oncomirs are downregulated, which has been attributed to amplification, deletion and/or mutation of miRNA loci, dysregulation of transcription factors and epigenetic silencing. Globally, miRNA expression alterations lead to the disturbance of several onco-genic or tumor-suppressor protein levels, which in turn alter cell growth by favoring tumor malignancy (10,11).

Over the last decade, the widespread deregulation of miRNAs in virtually all types of cancer has been clearly established, as have their implications during each stage of disease initiation, progression and development (12,13). Consequently, miRNAs are solid diagnostic and prognostic biomarker candidates and viable CC therapeutic targets (14,15).

2. miRNAs are associated with cervical carcinogenesis

Several factors are required for CC development, including the interaction of viral, environmental and host-dependent factors, which trigger tumor growth, invasion and metastasis. In addition, evidence of the importance of epigenetic regulation mechanisms has steadily increased over the last two decades, and has focused on the dysregulation of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes as the main generator of the malignant phenotype. In this regard, miRNAs have an important role as regulators of cell processes such as apoptosis, cell cycle progression, metastases and both chemo- and radioresistance (16). In an effort to understand the important role of several miRNAs during cervical carcinogenesis, we conducted an extensive literature review and found 60 research articles published between 2009 and 2014. These studies describe >40 deregulated miRNAs that target genes and are likely to be involved in the development and progression of CC, as well as in the chemoradiotherapy resistance mechanism (Table I).

Table I

Differential expression of miRNAS in CC vs. normal samples.

Table I

Differential expression of miRNAS in CC vs. normal samples.

miRNAStatusTarget geneRefs.miRNAStatusTarget geneRefs.
miR-155ULKB1(22)miR-944UHECW2/S100PB(44)
miR-196aUHOXC8(45)miR-497DIGF-1R(46)
miR-31UARID1A(33)miR-214DBCL2L2(37)
miR-130aUDicer(47)miR-155DEGF(48)
miR-215UNot identified(49)miR-303-367DAKT1(50)
miR-99a/99bDmTOR(51)miR-424DCHK1(52)
miR-506DGLI3(53)miR-205UCYR61/CGF(54)
miR-135aUSIAH1(55)miR-17-5pDTP53INP1(56)
miR-129-5pDSP1(57)miR-10aUCHL1(58)
miR-590UCHL1(59)miR-19a/19bUCUL5(60)
miR-181aUPRKCD(40)miR-125bDPIK3CD(61)
miR-99DTRIB2(62)miR-20aUTNKS2(63)
miR-196aUNTN4(64)miR-214DGALNT7(65)
miR-125bUBAK1(66)miR-143DBCL2(20)
miR-203DVEGFA(21)miR-133bU MST2/CDC42/RHOA(67)
miR-196bDHOXB7(68)miR-21UCCL20(17)
miR-7DXIAP(69)miR-1DPLK1(24)
miR-218DNot identified(70)miR-375DSP1(15)
miR-886-5pUBAX(19)miR-372DCDK2/cyclin A1(71)
miR-29DYY1/CDK6(25)miR-34aDNotch(18)
miR-23bDuPA(72)miR-519DHUR(73)
miR-214DPlexin-B1(74)miR-21UPDCD4(75)

[i] D, downregulated; U, upregulated; CC, cervical carcinoma.

Evidence supporting the correlation between miRNA expression and CC-related processes was initially described in 2009 (17). Findings of that study demonstrated that the expression of miR-21 promoted cell proliferation in HeLa CC cells, while its inhibition suppressed cell proliferation by overexpression of the tumor-suppressor gene PDCD4, a related programmed cell death protein. It also provided direct evidence that PDCD4 3′UTR is a functional target of this miRNA. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that miR-21 is a major oncomir, overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including CC (15).

miR-34a, a small molecule, has been described in studies on cervical carcinogenesis. Pang et al, demonstrated that it is downregulated in different CC cell lines such as HeLa, SiHa, C4I, C33a and CaSki, while the induction of its expression in HeLa cells reduced the invasiveness, affecting Notch and Jagged1 proteins as well as Notch downstream signaling by regulating urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) expression. The binding of miR-34a to the 3′UTR of Notch and Jagged1 was determined using siRNA functional assays (18).

MicroRNA expression profiling in squamous CC and adjacent non-tumor tissues showed that miR-886-5p was overexpressed in CC tissues. Subsequent in vitro assays in human H8 cervical squamous epithelial cell line revealed that this miRNA depressed BAX protein levels, reducing apoptosis and promoting cell proliferation. Conversely, knocking down miR-886-5p increased its pro-apoptotic protein target, BAX, inducing apoptotic cell death (19).

The same expression profile revealed miR-143 downregu-lation. Functional characterization of this miRNA through its overexpression in HeLa cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis, while the co-expression of anti-miR-143 reestablished the tumor phenotype. Additionally, HeLa cells transfected with pre-miR-143 were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of female athymic mice and miR-143 upregulation suppressed tumor formation. The functional target of this miRNA is Bcl-2, as shown through functional assays in which miR-143 suppressed the activity of a luciferase reporter carrying the 3′UTR of the Bcl-2 mRNA. Bcl-2 expression levels in CC tissues were inversely proportional to the levels of miR-143 (20).

By contrast, miR-203 was consistently downregulated in both biopsies and tumor cell lines due to hypermethylation of its promoter region. Functional assays revealed that this miRNA suppresses proliferation, tumor growth and angiogenesis (21). Lao et al (22) recently demonstrated that miR-155 was upregulated in CC tissues compared to adjacent non-neoplasic tissues, and its overexpression in HeLa and SiHa cells promoted proliferation. By contrast, its downregulation, inhibited cell cycle progression, promoted apoptosis and induced cell cycle arrest in those cell lines by directly targeting the LKB1 gene, which codes for a primary upstream kinase involved in AMPK activation, cell growth and proliferation suppression. Moreover, LKB1 was significantly downregulated in CC tissues, suggesting that this miRNA promoted CC cell prolife ration by regulating LKB1 expression (22).

The aforementioned findings demonstrate that miRNAs bear an important role in CC tumorigenesis. The main miRNA-regulated targets participate in mechanisms such as cell growth, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and angiogenesis, while it is widely accepted that deregulation of these cell processes are the major hallmarks of CC.

3. miRNAs involved in cervical cancer progression

A key process during CC progression is the proliferation of differentiating epithelial cells, and the participation of several miRNAs therein has been investigated. We conducted an extensive search of the literature, which yielded information concerning 17 miRNAs associated with the progression of premalignant lesions to invasive cancer, as identified in 20 articles (Table II).

Table II

miRNAs involved in cervical cancer progression.

Table II

miRNAs involved in cervical cancer progression.

miRNAStatusCellular processTarget geneClinical backgroundRefs.
miR-34aDp53-dependent pathway (cell cycle progression, cellular senescence)NOTCH, P18Ink4c, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin A, E2, E2F1, BCL2, BIRC3↓CIN I, ↓↓CIN II, ↓↓↓CIN III(26,76)
miR-218DFocal adhesionLAMB3↓CIN III, ↓↓↓CaCu(77)
miR-200a, miR-205NCMetastases (inhibit the EMT)ZEB1, ZEB2 and Sip1CaCu → CaCu metastasis(78)
miR-372DCell growth (induces arrest in the S/G2 phases of cell cycleCDK2, cyclin A1Cervical normal tissue → cervical cancer tissue(71)
miR-203DKeratinocyte differentiation/maintenance HPV episomesp-63-familyNormal epithelia → HPV-infected epithelia(79)
miR-143DCell growth and proliferationPPAR signaling↑Normal, ↓↓CIN, ↓↓CIN III, ↓↓carcinoma(23)
miR-145DCell motilityIGF-1↑Normal, ↓CIN, ↓CIN III, ↓carcinoma(23)
miR-99a, miR-513, miR-29aDCell death, tissue developmentIGF-1, BCL2L2, VEGFA and CDK6↑Normal, ↓CIN, ↓CIN III, ↓carcinoma(23)
miR-148aUTumor suppressor genesPTEN, P53INP1 and TP53INP2↑Normal, ↑↑CIN, ↑↑CIN III, ↑↑↑carcinoma(23)
miR-10a, miR-96a, miR-132UCell transformation and progressionHOX genes↑Normal, ↑↑↑CIN, ↑↑↑CIN III, ↑↑↑carcinoma(23)
miR-886-5pUCell transformation and B progressionAX↑ANTT, ↑↑↑CSCC(19)
miR-100DGrowth, cell cycle and apoptosisPLK1↑Normal, ↓CIN, ↓↓carcinoma(24)

[i] D, downregulated; U, upregulated; NC, no changes in expression level.

The differential miRNA expression pattern associated with CC progression using normal tissues, moderate/severe dysplasia and invasive squamous cell carcinoma infected with HPV16 sequences has been identified. The deregulated expression of 9 miRNAs was detected in cancer and dysplasia compared with normal cervical tissues. Significantly over-expressed miRNAs were miR-148a, miR-10a, miR-196a and miR-132; while significantly underexpressed miRNAs were miR143, miR145, miR-99a, miR-513 and miR-29a. The findings suggest that these miRNAs can potentially be used to recognize cervical cancer dysplasia from normal tissue (23).

An interesting study performed by Li et al (24) evidenced that, miR-100 downregulation plays an important role through loss of inhibition of its target gene PLK1, a kinase involved in the G2/M transition during CC development. Authors of that study examined the expression of miR-100 by RT-qPCR and the PLK1 mRNA and protein by RT-qPCR and immuno blotting, respectively, in 125 cervical tissues including normal cervical epithelia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer, as well as in five CC cell lines. miR-100 expression gradually decreased from low-grade to high-grade CIN and cervical cancer tissues, which correlated with the upregulated expression of PLK1 in CIN3 and cervical tissues. Findings of that study also showed that modulating the expression of miR-100 increased cell proliferation, deregulated the cell cycle and decreased apoptosis (24).

To determine the relationship of HPV 16-infection and miRNA expression in CC progression, Li et al (25), employed samples from 18 tissues obtained from normal, CIN 2–3 and squamous cell carcinoma biopsies to perform miRNAs microarray analysis; they covered 875 human miRNAs. Notably, the findings showed 31 unique miRNAs with a significantly deregulated expression from normal to CC (17 up- and 14 downregulated). Among these, miR-218 was the most significantly downregulated in the course from normal tissue to CC, while miR-29 was the most overex-pressed. Furthermore, miR-29 showed an important negative correlation between YY1 and CDK6 expression. The findings of that suggested that the expression level of miR-29 was regulated by HR-HPV E6/E7 (25).

Wang et al carried out in vitro assays that revealed a specific seed match between miR-34a and the 5′UTR of p18Ink4c, an important modulator of cell cycle progression, which suppresses its expression. Cervical pre-cancer lesions and cervical cancer showed an increase of p18Ink4c protein. Consistently, the immunohistochemical staining of cervical tissue arrays showed an increased p18Ink4c expression of 4.8% in normal cervical tissues, of 8.3% in chronic cervical inflammation and of 68% in cervical cancer. Those findings suggested that miR-34a was downregulated in infected cervical tissues, which is critical to persistent p18Ink4c activation (26).

Concerning invasion and metastasis, Lee et al (27) analyzed the expression level of 157 human mature miRNAs by means of TaqMan quantitative PCR array. In that study, 10 tumor biopsies staged as primary invasive squamous cell carcinomas (ISCC) and 10 normal tissues were used. The results identified significant evidence of 70 miRNAs being differentially expressed, 68 of which were upregulated and two downregulated. Of these, 10 miRNAs were significantly overexpressed, i.e., miR-199-s, miR-9, miR199a*, miR-199a, miR-199b, miR-145, miR-133a, miR-133b, miR-214 and miR-127 and only two were underexpressed, i.e., miR-149 and miR-203. Of note, the expression of miR-127 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. In vitro assays showed that blocking miR-199a expression exhibited an important reduction in cell growth (27). Fig. 1 summarizes the principal miRNAs involved in cervical carcinogenesis.

miRNAs associated with complex CC progression have been investigated. However, known CC-associated miRNAs target important, well-studied regulators of cell metabolism, strengthening the significance of their participation in the evolution of this pathology.

4. miRNAs involved in cervical cancer clinical outcome

The conventional treatment for LACC patients is radiotherapy concomitant with cisplatin. However, ~50% of LACC patients that receive radiotherapy exhibit recurrence or persistent disease, which may be explained by the presence of radioresistant cells within the tumor mass. Therefore, radio- and chemoresistance are major obstacles for an efficient cervical cancer treatment (4,5). Nonetheless, a meta-analysis showed that CC patients, treated with radiotherapy alone or in combination with different chemotherapeutic agents had a 40–70% 5-year survival rate (28).

In the last years, several miRNAs have been associated with survival and prognosis of CC patients. Thus, the expression and regulation of their targets have become molecular markers with clinical relevance prediction. In this section, we summarized data from an extensive bibliographical investigation regarding miRNAs associated with clinical outcome (Table III).

Table III

miRNAs involved in cervical cancer clinical outcome.

Table III

miRNAs involved in cervical cancer clinical outcome.

miRNAStatusTarget genOutcomeFunctionCC cell typeRefs.
miR-9DNot definedPoor survivalInvasion and cell motilitySquamous and adenocarcinoma cells(29)
miR-93, miR-200aURECKPoor survivalInvasion and lymphatic metastasesInvasive carcinoma(32)
miR-31UARID1APoor survivalNode metastases, stromal invasionInvasive carcinoma(33)
miR-26aDPRL-1Poor survivalInhibits cell proliferation and invasionInvasive carcinoma(80)
miR-224UNot definedPoor survivalAggressive progressionInvasive carcinoma(31)
Let-7cDHMGA2Poor survivalLymph node metastasesSmall cell carcinoma(30)
miR-100DRSP3, PLK1Poor survivalLymph node metastasesSmall cell carcinoma(30)
miR-125bDBAK1Poor survivalLymph node metastasesSmall cell carcinoma(30)
miR-143DBCL2, KRAS, DNMT3APoor survivalLymph node metastasesSmall cell carcinoma(30)
miR-145DBNIP3, IRS, STAT1, C-MYCPoor survivalLymph node metastases and poor survivalSmall cell carcinoma(30)
miR-199a-5pDSWI, SNF, PAK4Poor survivalLymph node metastases and poor survivalSmall cell carcinoma(30)

[i] D, downregulated; U, upregulated.

For instance, the expression profile of 96 cancer-related miRNAs from 102 CC tumor biopsies was analyzed (29). Through a mathematical algorithm, the authors identified that miR-200a and miR-9 were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). These miRNAS were individually transfected into HeLa cells and the expression profile of transfected cells was analyzed. Gene set enrichment and gene ontology-based analyses showed that miR-200a regulated ZEB1, ZEB2, TGFB2 and EXOC5 genes involved in the metastatic potential of cancer cells. Genes regulated by miR-9 were involved in metabolic processes, explaining the maintenance of a high metabolic rate by tumor cells, an important trait of the rapid proliferation of cervical cancer cells (29).

A similar study published in 2012, analyzed the expression profiles of 30 miRNAs associated with tumor metastasis from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of 44 SCCC patients who underwent radical hysterectomy. Seven miRNAs, i.e., let-7c, miR-10b, miR-100, miR-125b, miR-143, miR-145 and miR-199a-5p, were significantly downregulated in the advanced stage SCCC patients (FIGO IB2-IV) compared to the early stage SCCC patients (FIGO IB1). Downregulation of these miRNAS, with the exception of miR-10b, were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and with reduced survival in SCCC. Through a survival analysis, the authors identified that SCCC patients with a low expression of miR-100 and miR-125b projected a significant tendency towards a poorer prognosis (30).

Another study reported that the expression of miR-224 was significantly upregulated in cancer tissues of advanced FIGO stage cervical cancer patients, in lymph node metastasis-positive patients and in less-differentiated tumors (31). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with a higher miR-224 expression exhibited a shorter OS. Additionally, it was associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis and was employed as an independent marker for predicting the clinical outcome (31).

Subsequently, the expression of miR-93 and miR-200a was retrospectively evaluated in 116 patients with invasive CC and 100 patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign lesions in order to determine their clinical significance. The levels of miR-93 and miR-200a were measured by RT-qPCR, and the proteins RECK, MMP2 and MMP9 were assessed by immunohistochemical staining. Results showed the upregulation of miR-93, miR-200a, and MMP2 and MMP9 proteins, but the downregulation of RECK in CC tissues compared to benign lesion tissues. Notably, patients with a strong RECK expression had a 5-year survival rate, significantly higher than that of patients with lower RECK-expressing tumors. In addition, a significant inverse correlation was identified between RECK downregulation with invasion and lymphatic metastases. Thus, the expression of miRNAs and RECK, served as potential prognostic markers for the long-term survival of CC patients (32).

The role of miR-31 as an independent prognosis factor was determined and it was demonstrated that it is upregulated in CC cell lines as well as clinical samples. The high miR-31 level was significantly correlated with higher FIGO stages, node metastases, vascular involvement and deep stromal invasion and with poorer OS. Those results showed that, the downregulation of miR-31 impaired cell proliferation, colony formation, in vitro cell migration and invasion, and inhibited in vivo xenograft tumor growth. The authors verified that ARID1A was a direct target of miR-31, which was further confirmed by the inversely correlated expression of miR-31 and ARID1A in patient specimens. The authors of that study concluded that the miR-31/ARID1A pathway provides insight into the progression and clinical outcome of CC (33).

The abovementioned findings suggested that miRNAs may be used as biomarkers of OS, as they regulate genes involved in cell processes such as invasion, migration, growth and metastases. In this sense and to attempt to integrate and comprehend the complexity of the deregulation and interaction of miRNAs and the cell processes involved in the clinical outcome, we sketched a network with the miRNAs and their targets that shows miRNA-mRNA interaction using 7 of the 12 miRNAs involved in the clinical outcome, i.e., miR-199a-5p, miR125b, miR-143, miR-145, miR-9, miR93 and miR-200a (Fig. 2). These 7 miRNAs have a direct or indirect association with the regulation of their target. For example, miR-9 and miR-199a-5p have an indirect interaction with SOX9, a transcription factor associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), proliferation and regulation of apoptosis, while miR-199a-5p and miR-125b putatively target ERBB, a tyrosine kinase that activated the AKT/PI3K pathway, indirectly. Another instance is miR-125b, which interacts indirectly with miR-143 through the regulation of AKT1 and its migration and cell proliferation pathway. Furthermore, miR-143 and miR-145 inhibit HRAS secondarily, leading to activation of the MAPK cascade, progression of the cell cycle and suppression of apoptosis. VEGF-A, in turn, is downregulated by miR-145 and miR-9, while miR-9 also acts together with miR-93 and deregulates the expression of CCND1, a cyclin that activates the cell cycle. Notably, miR-93 interrelates with another 3 miRNAs: with miR-200a through the regulation of KLF11, a transcription factor that participates in cell cycle progression, proliferation and the inhibition of apoptosis; miR-125b, which possibly targets STAT3, a transcription factor involved in proliferation and suppression of apoptosis; and miR-199a-5p, which activates apoptosis through the underexpression of the tumor suppressor SMAD4.

5. miRNAs involved in the improvement of cervical cancer treatment response

miRNAs have become important regulators of treatment response and the understanding of their mechanisms represent potentially personalized molecular markers for the prediction of individual clinical outcomes. In addition, miRNAs were employed as novel therapeutic targets (34,35). Although they have been studied in different types of cancer, it has been established that 7 miRNAs were involved in CC treatment response, two of which were associated with chemoresistance, one with chemosistance and radioresistance, and the remaining miRNAs only with radioresistance.

The first study that established the association between miRNAs with treatment response was published by Shi et al (36). The aim of their study was to demonstrate a novel mechanism by which glucocorticoids modulate p53-dependent miR-145 expression in HPV-positive CC cells through the induction of E6 proteins. miR-145 expression was reduced in CC tissues by the action of cortisol, which simultaneously induced HPV-E6 expression and p53 suppression in CC cells. Expression of miR-145 in CC cells was wild-type and p53-dependent, and the cortisol-induced downregulation of miR-145 prevented chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, whereas its overexpression enhanced sensitivity to mitomycin and reversed the chemoresistance induced by glucocorticoids. Furthermore, miR-145 enhanced the effects of p53 by suppressing its inhibitors in CC cells, suggesting that miR-145 plays a role in p53 tumor suppression and inhibition in the motility and invasion of CC cells. These findings identified a novel pathway by which the neuroendocrine macro-environment affected cervical tumor growth, invasion and therapy resistance, while showing that miR-145 served as a target for CC therapy (36).

miR-214 is another miRNA that inhibits cell growth, migration and invasion. Wang et al (37) analyzed its role and function focusing on demonstrating that increasing levels of miR-214 reduced cell survival and enhanced cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in CC cells. Concordantly, the authors of that study showed that the ectopic expression of this miRNA reduced the cell survival rate, induced apoptosis and enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin by directly inhibiting BCL2L2 expression in HeLa and C-33A cervical cancer cells. Further analysis revealed that apoptosis was correlated with increased expression of Bax, caspase-3, -8 and -9. Collectively, those findings suggested that miR-214 is a potential target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies (37).

The mechanisms responsible for CC radioresistance regulated by miRNAs are largely unexplored, nevertheless, Zhang et al aimed to identify specific miRNAs involved (38). In order to find a specific miRNA signature, they established radioresistant CC cell variants by repeated radiation selection. The miRNA profiles of radioresistant cells and their corresponding controls were analyzed and compared using microarrays. Among the differentially expressed profiles, 20 miRNAs showed similar patterns of alteration: 14 miRNAs were overexpressed, while 6 were underexpressed in all three radioresistant CC cell variants compared to their controls. miR-630, miR-1246, miR-1290 and miR-3138, exhibited a >5-fold increase in radioresistant cells. Subsequent analysis revealed that the four miRNAs could be upregulated in CC cells by radiation treatment in time- and dose-dependent manners. Ectopic expression of each miRNA was demonstrated to markedly increase the survival fraction of irradiated CC cells. Notably, inhibition of miR-630, a miRNA of the specific signature reversed radioresistance of CC cells (38).

Ke et al demonstrated that miR-181a had an important role in radiation therapy (39). The aim of that study was to describe the roles of miR-181a as a regulator in CC-radioresistant phenotype, to explore the underlying mechanism and to evaluate the potential of miR-181a as a radio-sensitivity biomarker. miRNA profiles of CC tumor specimens were analyzed. The specimens were sourced from 18 patients with a histological diagnosis of squamous CC (clinical stage IIIB). The patients had not received any chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy. A higher expression of miR-181a was observed in radiation-insensitive CC specimens and cell lines, when compared to sensitive cancer specimens. Furthermore, miR-181a negatively regulated the expression of PRKCD, a pro-apoptotic protein kinase, through interaction with its 3′UTR messenger, thereby resulting in the inhibition of irradiation-induced apoptosis and decreasing G2/M blockade. The role of miR-181a in radioresistance was validated in cell culture and mouse tumor xenograft models. Cells bearing anti-miRNA were unable to resist radiation therapy, in contrast to cells expressing a miR181a mimic. Thus, the expression of miR-181a in CC constitutes a potential biomarker of sensitivity or response to radiation therapy and target miR-181a represented a new approach to sensitize CC to radiation treatment (39).

In addition to its role in radioresistance, miR-181 also confers chemoresistance in CC, according to studies of its significant upregulation in clinical biopsies from patients that do not respond to conventional cisplatin treatment (40). To clarify the role of miR-181a in regulating the chemoresistance of CC, its overexpression was induced in human cervical squamous cancer cell lines, SiHa and Me180, which resulted in enhanced chemoresistance to cisplatin through apoptosis reversion. In a nude mouse xenograft model, the overexpres-sion of miR-181a markedly inhibited the therapeutic response to cisplatin in a PRKCD-mediated manner. Additionally, PRKCD silencing yielded a similar effect to that of miR-181a upregulation, inhibiting apoptosis in CC cells. Thus, miR-181a may be used as a biomarker to predict chemosensitivity to cisplatin in patients with cervical squamous cancer (40).

The studies associated with miRNAs involved clinical outcome in CC patients. However, few may be applied as biomarkers of therapy response and as co-adjuvant therapeutic targets. As therapeutic agents, miRNAs were employed to enhance chemoradiosensitivity with the downregulation of its anti-apoptotic, DNA damage repair and cell cycle progression targets (4143).

5. Conclusions

Complex diseases such as CC require the conjunction of different factors. Thus, there are a number of events that lead an HPV-infected cell to form an invading, chemo- and radioresistant tumor mass that eventually takes the life of its host. It has been long established that many of these events can be genetic mutations that arise due to genome instability and persist due to selection. In this regard, many deregulated genes have been studied, the majority of which are associated with apoptosis, cell cycle control, migration, genetic instability, cell adhesion and metastasis.

Since miRNA profiles can be used to describe the chemo-radioresistance of tumors prior to treatment delivery and to monitor the response through the treatment, miRNA profiles can be useful in the selection of intensification strategies and predict final response to therapy and risks of recurrence or metastases. By contrast, individual miRNAs present an important opportunity to enhance treatment efficacy, as is the case of miR-181a. This miRNA was proven to be a chemosensitizer and radiosensitizer, and in both cases, it downregulates PRKCD, a kinase involved in the regulation of apoptosis and inhibition of cell growth, making it a reasonable candidate for miRNA-based therapy enhancement.

The evidence reviewed in the present study showed that miRNAs affect various biological pathways associated with the development, progression (CIN 1, 2, 3 and cancer), clinical outcome and treatment response improvement in CC and reinforce their relatively recent role as key players in carcino genesis. Consequently, their use in cervical cancer for diagnosis as well as clinical outcome prediction and therapy improvement may be utilized.

Acknowledgments

The present study was submitted by V. G.-Q. in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Doctorado en Ciencias Biomedicas), Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. It was financially supported in part by the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM; grant PAPCA-2014-6) and by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT; grant SALUD-2010-01-141907). V. G.-Q. received a CONACyT fellowship.

References

1 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:283–298. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Serrano B, Alemany L, Ruiz PA, Tous S, Lima MA, Bruni L, Jain A, Clifford GM, Qiao YL, Weiss T, et al: Potential impact of a 9-valent HPV vaccine in HPV-related cervical disease in 4 emerging countries (Brazil, Mexico, India and China). Cancer Epidemiol. 38:748–756. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, Favini G, Ferri L and Mangioni C: Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 350:535–540. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Beller U, Creasman WT, Heintz AP, Ngan HY and Pecorelli S: Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 95(Suppl 1): S43–S103. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Kong YW, Ferland-McCollough D, Jackson TJ and Bushell M: microRNAs in cancer management. Lancet Oncol. 13:e249–e258. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Suzuki H, Maruyama R, Yamamoto E and Kai M: Epigenetic alteration and microRNA dysregulation in cancer. Front Genet. 4:2582013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Friedman RC, Farh KKH, Burge CB and Bartel DP: Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res. 19:92–105. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar :

9 

Ma R, Jiang T and Kang X: Circulating microRNAs in cancer: Origin, function and application. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 31:382012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP and Anderson TA: microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol. 302:1–12. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Iorio MV and Croce CM: Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation. Cancer J. 18:215–222. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Calin GA and Croce CM: MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:857–866. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Agarwal SM, Raghav D, Singh H and Raghava GPS: CCDB: A curated database of genes involved in cervix cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:D975–D979. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :

14 

Juan L, Tong HL, Zhang P, Guo G, Wang Z, Wen X, Dong Z and Tian YP: Identification and characterization of novel serum microRNA candidates from deep sequencing in cervical cancer patients. Sci Rep. 4:62772014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Wang F, Li Y, Zhou J, Xu J, Peng C, Ye F, Shen Y, Lu W, Wan X and Xie X: miR-375 is down-regulated in squamous cervical cancer and inhibits cell migration and invasion via targeting transcription factor SP1. Am J Pathol. 179:2580–2588. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Kumar MS, Lu J, Mercer KL, Golub TR and Jacks T: Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet. 39:673–677. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Yao T and Lin Z: MiR-21 is involved in cervical squamous cell tumorigenesis and regulates CCL20. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1822:248–260. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Pang RTK, Leung CON, Ye TM, Liu W, Chiu PC, Lam KK, Lee KF and Yeung WS: MicroRNA-34a suppresses invasion through downregulation of Notch1 and Jagged1 in cervical carcinoma and choriocarcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 31:1037–1044. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Li JH, Xiao X, Zhang YN, Wang YM, Feng LM, Wu YM and Zhang YX: MicroRNA miR-886-5p inhibits apoptosis by down-regulating Bax expression in human cervical carcinoma cells. Gynecol Oncol. 120:145–151. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Liu L, Yu X, Guo X, Tian Z, Su M, Long Y, Huang C, Zhou F, Liu M, Wu X, et al: miR-143 is downregulated in cervical cancer and promotes apoptosis and inhibits tumor formation by targeting Bcl-2. Mol Med Rep. 5:753–760. 2012.

21 

Zhu X, Er K, Mao C, Yan Q, Xu H, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Cui F, Zhao W and Shi H: miR-203 suppresses tumor growth and angiogenesis by targeting VEGFA in cervical cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem. 32:64–73. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lao G, Liu P, Wu Q, Zhang W, Liu Y, Yang L and Ma C: Mir-155 promotes cervical cancer cell proliferation through suppression of its target gene LKB1. Tumour Biol. 35:11933–11939. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Pereira PM, Marques JP, Soares AR, Carreto L and Santos MA: MicroRNA expression variability in human cervical tissues. PLoS One. 5:e117802010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Li BH, Zhou JS, Ye F, Cheng XD, Zhou CY, Lu WG and Xie X: Reduced miR-100 expression in cervical cancer and precursors and its carcinogenic effect through targeting PLK1 protein. Eur J Cancer. 47:2166–2174. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Li Y, Wang F, Xu J, Ye F, Shen Y, Zhou J, Lu W, Wan X, Ma D and Xie X: Progressive miRNA expression profiles in cervical carcinogenesis and identification of HPV-related target genes for miR-29. J Pathol. 224:484–495. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Wang X, Meyers C, Guo M and Zheng ZM: Upregulation of p18Ink4c expression by oncogenic HPV E6 via p53-miR-34a pathway. Int J Cancer. 129:1362–1372. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :

27 

Lee JW, Choi CH, Choi JJ, Park YA, Kim SJ, Hwang SY, Kim WY, Kim TJ, Lee JH, Kim BG, et al: Altered MicroRNA expression in cervical carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2535–2542. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration: Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 26:5802–5812. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Hu X, Schwarz JK, Lewis JS Jr, Huettner PC, Rader JS, Deasy JO, Grigsby PW and Wang X: A microRNA expression signature for cervical cancer prognosis. Cancer Res. 70:1441–1448. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Huang L, Lin JX, Yu YH, Zhang MY, Wang HY and Zheng M: Downregulation of six microRNAs is associated with advanced stage, lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in small cell carcinoma of the cervix. PLoS One. 7:e337622012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Shen SN, Wang LF, Jia YF, Hao YQ, Zhang L and Wang H: Upregulation of microRNA-224 is associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis in human cervical cancer. Diagn Pathol. 8:692013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Wang L, Wang Q, Li HL and Han LY: Expression of MiR200a, miR93, metastasis-related gene RECK and MMP2/MMP9 in human cervical carcinoma - relationship with prognosis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:2113–2118. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Wang N, Zhou Y, Zheng L and Li H: MiR-31 is an independent prognostic factor and functions as an oncomir in cervical cancer via targeting ARID1A. Gynecol Oncol. 134:129–137. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Hu A, Huang JJ, Xu WH, Jin XJ, Li JP, Tang YJ, Huang XF, Cui HJ and Sun GB: miR-21 and miR-375 microRNAs as candidate diagnostic biomarkers in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: Association with patient survival. Am J Transl Res. 6:604–613. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Miller P, Clarke J, Koru-Sengul T, Brinkman J and El-Ashry D: A novel MAPK-microRNA signature is predictive of hormone-therapy resistance and poor outcome in ER-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 21:373–385. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Shi M, Du L, Liu D, Qian L, Hu M, Yu M, Yang Z, Zhao M, Chen C, Guo L, et al: Glucocorticoid regulation of a novel HPV-E6-p53-miR-145 pathway modulates invasion and therapy resistance of cervical cancer cells. J Pathol. 228:148–157. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Wang F, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MiR-214 reduces cell survival and enhances cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity via down-regulation of Bcl2l2 in cervical cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 587:488–495. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Zhang B, Chen J, Ren Z, Chen Y, Li J, Miao X, Song Y, Zhao T, Li Y, Shi Y, et al: A specific miRNA signature promotes radioresistance of human cervical cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 13:1182013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ke G, Liang L, Yang JM, Huang X, Han D, Huang S, Zhao Y, Zha R, He X and Wu X: MiR-181a confers resistance of cervical cancer to radiation therapy through targeting the pro-apoptotic PRKCD gene. Oncogene. 32:3019–3027. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Chen Y, Ke G, Han D, Liang S, Yang G and Wu X: MicroRNA-181a enhances the chemoresistance of human cervical squamous cell carcinoma to cisplatin by targeting PRKCD. Exp Cell Res. 320:12–20. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Fang L, Li H, Wang L, Hu J, Jin T, Wang J and Yang BB: MicroRNA-17-5p promotes chemotherapeutic drug resistance and tumour metastasis of colorectal cancer by repressing PTEN expression. Oncotarget. 5:2974–2987. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Lee KM, Choi EJ and Kim IA: microRNA-7 increases radiosen-sitivity of human cancer cells with activated EGFR-associated signaling. Radiother Oncol. 101:171–176. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Yang SM, Huang C, Li XF, Yu MZ, He Y and Li J: miR-21 confers cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells by regulating PTEN. Toxicology. 306:162–168. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Xie H, Lee L, Scicluna P, Kavak E, Larsson C, Sandberg R and Lui WO: Novel functions and targets of miR-944 in human cervical cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 136:E230–E241. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Villegas-Ruiz V, Juárez-Méndez S, Pérez-González OA, Arreola H, Paniagua-García L, Parra-Melquiadez M, Peralta-Rodríguez R, López-Romero R, Monroy-García A, Mantilla-Morales A, et al: Heterogeneity of microRNAs expression in cervical cancer cells: Over-expression of miR-196a. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7:1389–1401. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

46 

Luo M, Shen D, Zhou X, Chen X and Wang W: MicroRNA-497 is a potential prognostic marker in human cervical cancer and functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor. Surgery. 153:836–847. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

He L, Wang HY, Zhang L, Huang L, Li JD, Xiong Y, Zhang MY, Jia WH, Yun JP, Luo RZ, et al: Prognostic significance of low DICER expression regulated by miR-130a in cervical cancer. Cell Death Dis. 5:e12052014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Lei C, Wang Y, Huang Y, Yu H, Huang Y, Wu L and Huang L: Up-regulated miR155 reverses the epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by EGF and increases chemo-sensitivity to cisplatin in human Caski cervical cancer cells. PLoS One. 7:e523102012. View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Liang H, Li Y, Luo RY and Shen FJ: MicroRNA-215 is a potential prognostic marker for cervical cancer. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 34:207–212. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Cai N, Wang YD and Zheng PS: The microRNA-302-367 cluster suppresses the proliferation of cervical carcinoma cells through the novel target AKT1. RNA. 19:85–95. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

51 

Wang L, Chang L, Li Z, Gao Q, Cai D, Tian Y, Zeng L and Li M: miR-99a and -99b inhibit cervical cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting mTOR signaling pathway. Med Oncol. 31:9342014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Xu J, Li Y, Wang F, Wang X, Cheng B, Ye F, Xie X, Zhou C and Lu W: Suppressed miR-424 expression via upregulation of target gene Chk1 contributes to the progression of cervical cancer. Oncogene. 32:976–987. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Wen SY, Lin Y, Yu YQ, Cao SJ, Zhang R, Yang XM, Li J, Zhang YL, Wang YH, Ma MZ, et al: miR-506 acts as a tumor suppressor by directly targeting the hedgehog pathway transcription factor Gli3 in human cervical cancer. Oncogene. 34:717–725. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Xie H, Zhao Y, Caramuta S, Larsson C and Lui WO: miR-205 expression promotes cell proliferation and migration of human cervical cancer cells. PLoS One. 7:e469902012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Leung CON, Deng W, Ye T-M, Ngan HY, Tsao SW, Cheung AN, Pang RT and Yeung WS: miR-135a leads to cervical cancer cell transformation through regulation of β-catenin via a SIAH1-dependent ubiquitin proteosomal pathway. Carcinogenesis. 35:1931–1940. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Wei Q, Li Y-X, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MiR-17-5p targets TP53INP1 and regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis of cervical cancer cells. IUBMB Life. 64:697–704. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Zhang J, Li S, Yan Q, Chen X, Yang Y, Liu X and Wan X: Interferon-β induced microRNA-129-5p down-regulates HPV-18 E6 and E7 viral gene expression by targeting SP1 in cervical cancer cells. PLoS One. 8:e813662013. View Article : Google Scholar

58 

Long MJ, Wu FX, Li P, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-10a targets CHL1 and promotes cell growth, migration and invasion in human cervical cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 324:186–196. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

59 

Chu Y, Ouyang Y, Wang F, Zheng A, Bai L, Han L, Chen Y and Wang H: MicroRNA-590 promotes cervical cancer cell growth and invasion by targeting CHL1. J Cell Biochem. 115:847–853. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Xu XM, Wang XB, Chen MM, Liu T, Li YX, Jia WH, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-19a and -19b regulate cervical carcinoma cell proliferation and invasion by targeting CUL5. Cancer Lett. 322:148–158. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Cui F, Li X, Zhu X, Huang L, Huang Y, Mao C, Yan Q, Zhu J, Zhao W and Shi H: MiR-125b inhibits tumor growth and promotes apoptosis of cervical cancer cells by targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalytic subunit delta. Cell Physiol Biochem. 30:1310–1318. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Xin JX, Yue Z, Zhang S, Jiang ZH, Wang PY, Li YJ, Pang M and Xie SY: miR-99 inhibits cervical carcinoma cell proliferation by targeting TRIB2. Oncol Lett. 6:1025–1030. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

63 

Kang HW, Wang F, Wei Q, Zhao YF, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: miR-20a promotes migration and invasion by regulating TNKS2 in human cervical cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 586:897–904. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Zhang J, Zheng F, Yu G, Yin Y and Lu Q: miR-196a targets netrin 4 and regulates cell proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 440:582–588. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Peng RQ, Wan HY, Li HF, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-214 suppresses growth and invasiveness of cervical cancer cells by targeting UDP-N-acetyl-α-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 7. J Biol Chem. 287:14301–14309. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Wang YD, Cai N, Wu XL, Cao H-Z, Xie LL and Zheng PS: OCT4 promotes tumorigenesis and inhibits apoptosis of cervical cancer cells by miR-125b/BAK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 4:e7602013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Qin W, Dong P, Ma C, Mitchelson K, Deng T, Zhang L, Sun Y, Feng X, Ding Y, Lu X, et al: MicroRNA-133b is a key promoter of cervical carcinoma development through the activation of the ERK and AKT1 pathways. Oncogene. 31:4067–4075. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

68 

How C, Hui ABY, Alajez NM, Shi W, Boutros PC, Clarke BA, Yan R, Pintilie M, Fyles A, Hedley DW, et al: MicroRNA-196b regulates the homeobox B7-vascular endothelial growth factor axis in cervical cancer. PLoS One. 8:e678462013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Liu S, Zhang P, Chen Z, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-7 downregulates XIAP expression to suppress cell growth and promote apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 587:2247–2253. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Yamamoto N, Kinoshita T, Nohata N, Itesako T, Yoshino H, Enokida H, Nakagawa M, Shozu M and Seki N: Tumor suppressive microRNA-218 inhibits cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting focal adhesion pathways in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 42:1523–1532. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

71 

Tian RQ, Wang XH, Hou LJ, Jia WH, Yang Q, Li YX, Liu M, Li X and Tang H: MicroRNA-372 is down-regulated and targets cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and cyclin A1 in human cervical cancer, which may contribute to tumorigenesis. J Biol Chem. 286:25556–25563. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

72 

Au Yeung CL, Tsang TY, Yau PL and Kwok TT: Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 induces cervical cancer cell migration through the p53/microRNA-23b/urokinase-type plasminogen activator pathway. Oncogene. 30:2401–2410. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

73 

Abdelmohsen K, Kim MM, Srikantan S, Mercken EM, Brennan SE, Wilson GM, Cabo R and Gorospe M: miR-519 suppresses tumor growth by reducing HuR levels. Cell Cycle. 9:1354–1359. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

74 

Qiang R, Wang F, Shi LY, Liu M, Chen S, Wan HY, Li YX, Li X, Gao SY and Sun BC: Plexin-B1 is a target of miR-214 in cervical cancer and promotes the growth and invasion of HeLa cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 43:632–641. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Yao Q, Xu H, Zhang QQ, Zhou H and Qu LH: MicroRNA-21 promotes cell proliferation and down-regulates the expression of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 388:539–542. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Li B, Hu Y, Ye F, Li Y, Lv W and Xie X: Reduced miR-34a expression in normal cervical tissues and cervical lesions with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 20:597–604. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

77 

Martinez I, Gardiner AS, Board KF, Monzon FA, Edwards RP and Khan SA: Human papillomavirus type 16 reduces the expression of microRNA-218 in cervical carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 27:2575–2582. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar :

78 

Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y and Goodall GJ: The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 10:593–601. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Melar-New M and Laimins LA: Human papillomaviruses modulate expression of microRNA 203 upon epithelial differentiation to control levels of p63 proteins. J Virol. 84:5212–5221. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

Dong J, Sui L, Wang Q, Chen M and Sun H: MicroRNA-26a inhibits cell proliferation and invasion of cervical cancer cells by targeting protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA 1. Mol Med Rep. 10:1426–1432. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2016
Volume 35 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1021-335X
Online ISSN:1791-2431

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
González-Quintana V, Palma-Berré L, Campos-Parra AD, López‑Urrutia E, Peralta-Zaragoza O, Vazquez-Romo R and Pérez-Plasencia C: MicroRNAs are involved in cervical cancer development, progression, clinical outcome and improvement treatment response (Review). Oncol Rep 35: 3-12, 2016
APA
González-Quintana, V., Palma-Berré, L., Campos-Parra, A.D., López‑Urrutia, E., Peralta-Zaragoza, O., Vazquez-Romo, R., & Pérez-Plasencia, C. (2016). MicroRNAs are involved in cervical cancer development, progression, clinical outcome and improvement treatment response (Review). Oncology Reports, 35, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4369
MLA
González-Quintana, V., Palma-Berré, L., Campos-Parra, A. D., López‑Urrutia, E., Peralta-Zaragoza, O., Vazquez-Romo, R., Pérez-Plasencia, C."MicroRNAs are involved in cervical cancer development, progression, clinical outcome and improvement treatment response (Review)". Oncology Reports 35.1 (2016): 3-12.
Chicago
González-Quintana, V., Palma-Berré, L., Campos-Parra, A. D., López‑Urrutia, E., Peralta-Zaragoza, O., Vazquez-Romo, R., Pérez-Plasencia, C."MicroRNAs are involved in cervical cancer development, progression, clinical outcome and improvement treatment response (Review)". Oncology Reports 35, no. 1 (2016): 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4369