International Journal of Molecular Medicine is an international journal devoted to molecular mechanisms of human disease.
International Journal of Oncology is an international journal devoted to oncology research and cancer treatment.
Covers molecular medicine topics such as pharmacology, pathology, genetics, neuroscience, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology, and molecular surgery.
Oncology Reports is an international journal devoted to fundamental and applied research in Oncology.
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine is an international journal devoted to laboratory and clinical medicine.
Oncology Letters is an international journal devoted to Experimental and Clinical Oncology.
Explores a wide range of biological and medical fields, including pharmacology, genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and molecular cardiology.
International journal addressing all aspects of oncology research, from tumorigenesis and oncogenes to chemotherapy and metastasis.
Multidisciplinary open-access journal spanning biochemistry, genetics, neuroscience, environmental health, and synthetic biology.
Open-access journal combining biochemistry, pharmacology, immunology, and genetics to advance health through functional nutrition.
Publishes open-access research on using epigenetics to advance understanding and treatment of human disease.
An International Open Access Journal Devoted to General Medicine.
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent cancers of the urinary tract, with ~550,000 new cases identified each year (1). Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) is a cornerstone in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC), and it is frequently combined with adjuvant intravesical therapies to minimize recurrence rates (2). Among these therapies, the instillation of mitomycin C (MMC) has demonstrated efficacy in preventing tumor recurrence post-TURBT (3,4). However, despite its benefits, MMC instillation is associated with inherent risks, including bladder perforation (5). Bladder perforation following MMC instillation post-TURBT represents a rare, yet clinically significant complication, with a limited number of documented cases in the literature (6). The pathophysiology of this condition remains poorly understood; however, it is considered to result from the necrosis of the attenuated muscularis propria following MMC instillation (4). Delayed diagnosis could lead to increased morbidity, challenges in management and even mortality (7). The present case report describes a case of bladder perforation due to post-TURBT MMC instillation and also conducts a brief review of the literature.
A 61-year-old male patient who was a smoker with diabetes presented to Smart Health Tower (Sulaymaniyah, Iraq) with an incidental finding of a bladder mass. He was on empagliflozin and gliclazide.
A physical examination did not reveal any notable findings.
A cystoscopy revealed a pedunculated mass at the posterior wall of the bladder (data not shown; images not available). A TURBT was performed; in addition, ahistopathological examination (HPE) was performed on 5-µm paraffin-embedded sections. The sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 24 h and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Bio Optica Co.) for 1-2 min at room temperature. The sections were then examined under a light microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH). This revealed a low-grade, stage pTa papillary urothelial (transitional) cell carcinoma (Fig. 1). A single session of 40 mg intravesical MMC was administered. After 6 months, a follow-up cystoscopy revealed a small mass posteriorly near the bladder dome (Fig. 2). Another TURBT was performed. The surgery was uneventful, and no bladder perforation was noted. The mass was sent for HPE (Fig. 2) and this revealed a low-grade, non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (stage pTa). At 6 h post-operatively, the patient received an MMC session. After 1 week, he complained of suprapubic pain, dysuria and insomnia. He was administered analgesics (paracetamol at 1,000 mg on need) for 1 week without symptom relief. An abdominal ultrasound (US) revealed mildly increased bladder wall thickness around the dome and a localized, irregular, loculated fluid collection (42 ml) with internal septa (data not shown; images not available). A Foley catheter was inserted, and he was discharged on analgesics (paracetamol at 1,000 mg on need) and antibiotics (meropenem at 1,000 mg, 1x2 for 4 days, followed by ciprofloxacin/ornidazole at 500/500 mg, 1x2 for 5 days). On the 22nd day after the surgery, he presented with severe suprapubic pain. A computed tomography (CT) cystography revealed diffuse vesical wall thickening up to 10 mm, with a focal wall defect in the urinary bladder dome (Fig. 3). The defect measured 5x5 mm. There was extravasation of contrast-enhanced urine into the perivesical space, forming a 7x5x5 cm fluid collection (almost 90 ml) containing gas bubbles. Under US guidance, a tube drain was placed. Despite maintaining the Foley catheter in place, he had ~200 cc of urine from the drain daily for 10 days.
An open repair of the perforation was performed via a lower midline laparotomy. A watertight three-layer suturing of the bladder was performed, and the edges were sent for HPE, which revealed only inflammatory changes with no evidence of malignant cells. A tube drain and a Foley catheter were inserted. At 1 week post-laparotomy, the drain was removed. A micturating cystourethrogram (MCUG) was performed 2 weeks later, and no leakage was observed. However, a US scan revealed an 8x3 cm collection behind the bladder. The collection was aspirated and sent for creatinine analysis, which returned 11.15 mg/dl. Culture on the same fluid yielded a growth of Escherichia coli. The patient was discharged on antibiotics (gentamicin at 80 mg, 1x2 for 4 days followed by nitrofurantoin at 100 mg, 1x3 for 10 days). At 6 weeks post-laparotomy, he presented again with suprapubic pain, and a US scan revealed a perivesical collection. Under US guidance, a drain was placed again. A CT scan revealed the features of an abscess by gas-forming microorganisms (Fig. 4). The patient was prepared for another operation. A lower midline laparotomy was done, and a thick adhesion (perivesical tissue) around the dome of the peritoneum was found. An erythematous part of the bladder was excised and sent for HPE. HPE was performed on 5-µm paraffin-embedded sections. The sections were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 24 h and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Bio Optica Co.) for 1-2 min at room temperature. The sections were then examined under a light microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH). The bladder was sutured in three layers, and a flap of omentum was used to cover the sutures. A Foley catheter was inserted, and a drain was left in the pelvis. The HPE of the perivesical tissue revealed extensive fibrosis and chronic inflammation, while that of the bladder tissue revealed reactive urothelial change and necrotizing cystitis, consistent with drug-induced cystitis (Fig. 5).
At 10 days after the second laparotomy, the drain was removed and an abdominal US revealed no collection. The stitches were removed. A new Foley catheter was inserted, and the patient was discharged on antibiotics (meropenem at 500 mg, 1x2 for 3 days and then cefditoren pivoxil at 200 mg, 1x2 for 5 days). The general condition of the patient gradually improved. At 18 days after the last laparotomy, the MCUG was normal, revealing no leaks (Fig. 6). The Foley catheter was then removed. The patient is currently stable and on follow-up.
Herein, a literature review was also conducted to identify relevant studies on complications following MMC instillation after TURBT. The process involved a Google Scholar and PubMed search without time restriction, employing key words, such as ‘mitomycin C instillation’, ‘complications’ and ‘transurethral resection of bladder tumor’. A total of six studies on this topic were identified (Table I). Among the reviewed cases, three were female patients, and three were male patients. Their ages ranged from 48 to 79 years. The clinical presentation included severe and excruciating pelvic and lower abdominal pain, irritative urinary symptoms, hydronephrosis and pudendal neuralgia. Of note, 3 out of the 6 patients underwent surgical interventions, such as exploratory laparotomy, bladder defect repair, TURBT, ureteric stenting and radical cystectomy, while the remaining 3 cases were initially managed conservatively with antibiotics and indwelling catheters. On HPE, the complications in all cases revealed inflammatory and necrotizing changes consistent with complications resulting from MMC instillation. Notably, 5 of the patients were symptom-free on follow-up (4-6,8,9), while 1 patient still had persistent symptoms following a long stay in a rehabilitation unit (10).
Table ISummary of the reported literature on complications of mitomycin C instillation post-transurethral resection of bladder tumor. |
BC is the seventh most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in men (11). The average age at diagnosis is 73 years of age, with Caucasian Americans having a higher incidence compared to African Americans. Of note, >90% of BC cases are urothelial carcinoma, while squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma are less frequent. This cancer is staged as either NMIBC or muscle-invasive (MIBC), with NMIBC being the more frequent diagnosis (70-85%). Smoking, occupational exposure, inflammation, radiation and chemotherapy all contribute to an increased risk of developing BC. Painless, gross hematuria is the most common symptom (80%), while 30% of patients may present with irritative urinary symptoms or clinical signs such as an abdominal mass or suprapubic distention (8). The case described herein was a 61-year-old male patient who was a smoker with diabetes; he was incidentally found to have a bladder mass despite a normal physical examination of the bladder.
The European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines, based on the possibility of recurrence and progression, recommend the stratification of patients into risk groups, with low-risk tumors termed low-risk NMIBC (LR-NMIBC) and characterized by specific features such as being solitary, low-grade, stage pTa, primary, <3 cm in diameter and a lack of carcinoma in situ (12,13). The standard treatment approach for LR-NMIBC involves TURBT followed by a single dose of adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy, which has been demonstrated to significantly reduce disease recurrence rates compared to TURBT alone (14). In the case presented herein, TURBT was performed, and a low-grade pTa tumor was confirmed by HPE that was classified as LR-NMIBC. Subsequently, a single 40 mg intravesical MMC dose was administered in a single session. A follow-up cystoscopy 6 months later revealed a small posterior mass near the dome of the bladder. Another TURBT procedure was carried out, and the patient had another MMC session 6 h later. There was no evidence of bladder perforation following the uncomplicated surgery. The HPE again defined the mass as a low-grade, pTa NMIBC.
The rationale for adjuvant chemotherapy is its ability to target circulating tumor cells after TURBT and to exert an ablative effect on residual and overlooked tumors. MMC is the most commonly utilized adjuvant agent, functioning as an alkylating agent that inhibits DNA synthesis and causes DNA and chromosomal damage. Despite its efficacy, MMC administration may lead to mild, transient irritative bladder symptoms that can be managed medically. Dysuria, urinary frequency and urgency are the most common complications (8). However, the major complication is bladder perforation (6,9,15). Possible contributing factors to bladder perforation following MMC instillation include unrecognized bladder wall injury or microscopic perforation during TURBT, deep or extensive resection, immediate post-operative MMC instillation before adequate tissue healing and the direct cytotoxic effect of MMC, which can cause inflammation, necrosis, and impaired wound healing. The extravasation of MMC into perivesical tissues may lead to severe inflammation, fibrosis and delayed bladder rupture. Recurrent tumors and repeated prior TURBT procedures may further increase the risk (6,16,10).
Penna et al (6) described the case of a 77-year-old Caucasian male patient who received an early MMC instillation after TURBT. The patient reported urine retention after removing an indwelling catheter (6). Hatem and Leifeld (15) reported that a 74-year-old woman with a history of low-grade bladder cancer developed persistent abdominal pain and difficulty urinating just days after receiving MMC therapy for a recurrent tumor. The patient described herein developed suprapubic pain and irritative urinary symptoms 1 week after undergoing TURBT with subsequent MMC instillation. Intraoperatively, the operator had no concerns about bladder perforation. Furthermore, the early instillation of MMC was initially symptom-free.
The diagnosis of bladder perforation following intravesical MMC instillation involves clinical assessment, imaging studies and an endoscopic evaluation (7). Patients should be monitored for symptoms, such as severe abdominal pain, ileus and signs of peritonitis, which is of paramount importance (10). Imaging modalities, such as CT scans and cystoscopy aid in detection (7,14). A CT scan with retrograde cystography may demonstrate a localized extravasation (leakage) from the bladder wall into the extraperitoneal space (7). The CT cystography of the patient in the present case report revealed widespread vesical wall thickening with a 5x5 mm focal defect in the urinary bladder dome, resulting in contrast-enhanced urine extravasation into the perivesical space and a 7x5x5 cm fluid collection with gas bubbles.
In terms of management, some cases may initially be managed conservatively, including urethral catheterization, anticholinergic medications and antibiotic therapy (6,8). Nonetheless, these measures proved inadequate for bladder healing in certain instances, necessitating more invasive interventions, such as open repair procedures. Additionally, in some cases, the ultimate resolution involved cystectomy as a definitive treatment option (8,15). In the study by Penna et al (6), the patient was managed conservatively with analgesia, antibiotics and a 16-F indwelling catheter for 4 weeks. At the 2-week follow-up, non-tender suprapubic induration was palpable, which resolved within 6 weeks (6). In the study by Albradi et al (5), it was reported that the patient had an extraperitoneal extravasation that persisted with conservative management and necessitated an open surgical repair. Similarly, after multiple failed attempts at conservative treatment, the patient described herein underwent a lower midline laparotomy, which confirmed the presence of a bladder perforation. A watertight three-layer suturing of the bladder was performed. Subsequent imaging at 6 weeks post-laparotomy revealed a collection, leading to a secondary laparotomy. The bladder was sutured in three layers, and a flap of omentum was used to cover the sutures. The HPE of the perivesical tissue and bladder wall revealed extensive fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and necrotizing cystitis, consistent with a drug-induced cystitis. Follow-up revealed gradual improvement, and symptoms resolved, with normalization of findings on MCUG 18 days after the second laparotomy.
In conclusion, MMC instillation as an option to reduce tumor recurrence risk after TURBT may induce bladder perforation. Therefore, awareness of potential consequences is essential. The early detection of bladder perforation symptoms is critical, and urethral catheterization and imaging may be required, followed by surgical repair.
Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was received.
The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.
RB, KFHH and IA were involved in the conception and design of the study, and in the literature review. SSO, DHKR and BSS were involved in the design of the study, in the literature review, and in the critical revision of the manuscript. RMA was the pathologist who performed the histopathological examination and prepared the related images. CS and RJR were the radiologists who performed the radiological examination and prepared the related images. AAQ, HOA, NHH and FHK were involved in the design of the study, in the literature review, and in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. RB and NHH confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for participation in the study.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the present case report and any accompanying images.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
|
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 68:394–424. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Hernández V, Kaasinen E, Palou J, Rouprêt M, et al: EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol. 71:447–461. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, Gontero P, Liedberg F, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, et al: European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ). Eur Urol. 81:75–94. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Hall MC, Chang SS, Dalbagni G, Pruthi RS, Seigne JD, Skinner EC, Wolf JS Jr and Schellhammer PF: Guideline for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (stages Ta, T1, and Tis): 2007 update. J Urolo. 178:2314–2330. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Alrabadi A, Abuhamad M, Mansi H, Alhamss S, Bustami N, Al Demour S and Al-Abbadi MA: Delayed bladder perforation related to immediate single dose intravesical doxorubicin instillation after TURBT: A case report and literature review. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 14(1179547620986158)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Penna M, Mistry K, Pal P and Sudhanshu C: Intravesical instillation of mitomycin C: A cause of delayed bladder perforation? Case Rep Urol. 2012(576519)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
EAU Guidelines. Edn. Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. ISBN 978-94-92671-07-3. | |
|
Chemi J, Jaunarena JH, Camean J, Azuri W, Villaronga A and Villoldo GM: Post-Transurethral resection of bladder tumor bladder perforation resulting in mitomycin C Extravasation, pudendal neuralgia, and ureterohydronephrosis. J Endourol Case Rep. 6:315–318. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Oehlschlager S, Loessnitzer A, Froehner M, Hakenberg OW, Manseck A and Wirth MP: Distal ureteral stenosis after early adjuvant intravesical mitomycin C application for superficial bladder cancer. Urol Int. 70:74–76. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lim D, Izawa JI, Middlebrook P and Chin JL: Bladder perforation after immediate postoperative intravesical instillation of mitomycin C. Can Urol Assoc J. 4:E1–E3. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Farling KB: Bladder cancer: Risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Nurse Pract. 42:26–33. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Escrig JLD, Gontero P, Liedberg F, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, et al: EAU Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and CIS). Eur Urol. 71(447)2017. | |
|
Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, Pruthi R, Quale DZ, Ritch CR, Seigne JD, et al: Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol. 196:1021–1029. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Clark T, Chang SS and Cookson MS: Eosinophilic cystitis presenting as a recurrent symptomatic bladder mass following intravesical mitomycin C therapy. J Urol. 167(1795)2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Hatem H and Leifeld J: A rare complication of intravesical early instillation of mitomycin C after TURBT. Urol Case Rep. 26(100955)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Shapiro O, Jones K, Wang C, Landas S and Haas GP: Risk of post-operative intravesical mitomycin C instillation following transurethral bladder tumor resection. Can J Urol. 13:3317–3320. 2006.PubMed/NCBI |