<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMM</journal-id>
<journal-title>International Journal of Molecular Medicine</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1107-3756</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-244X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ijmm.2012.1003</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijmm-30-02-0383</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Senescence is accelerated through donor cell specificity in cloned pigs</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>JEON</surname><given-names>HYUN YONG</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>JEONG</surname><given-names>YEON WOO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>KIM</surname><given-names>YEON WOOK</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>JEONG</surname><given-names>YEON IK</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HOSSEIN</surname><given-names>SHAMIM M.</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>YANG</surname><given-names>HYUN</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HYUN</surname><given-names>SANG HWAN</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref rid="af2-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>JEUNG</surname><given-names>EUI-BAE</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijmm-30-02-0383"/><xref rid="af2-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HWANG</surname><given-names>WOO SUK</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c2-ijmm-30-02-0383"/><xref rid="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijmm-30-02-0383">
<label>1</label>Sooam Biotech Research Foundation, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-904;</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijmm-30-02-0383">
<label>2</label>College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, 
<country>Republic of Korea</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijmm-30-02-0383">Correspondence to: Dr Eui-Bae Jeung, Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheong ju, Chungbuk 361-763, Republic of Korea, E-mail: <email>ebjeung@cbu.ac.kr</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c2-ijmm-30-02-0383">Dr Woo Suk Hwang, Sooam Biotech Research Foundation, San 43-41 Oryu-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul 152-904, Republic of Korea, E-mail: <email>hwangws@sooam.org</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>8</month>
<year>2012</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2012</year></pub-date>
<volume>30</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>383</fpage>
<lpage>391</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2012</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2012</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2012, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<p>This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.</p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Animals cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) sometimes have abnormalities that result in large offspring syndrome or early death during gestation due to respiratory and metabolic defects. We cloned pigs using two sources of donor cells and observed phenotypic anomalies in three pigs cloned from one type of cell, s-pig fetal fibroblasts. These animals had many wrinkles on their faces and bodies and looked older than age-matched normal pigs. We performed the present study to examine whether the wrinkled phenotype in the cloned pigs was due to senescence, a genetic problem with donor specificity, or epigenetic problems with reprogramming. To address this issue, we investigated biomarkers of senescence, including telomere length and the expression of senescence-associated &#x003B2;-galactosidase (SA-&#x003B2;-gal), glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and &#x003B2;-actin. We also assessed the methylation status of euchromatic PRE-1 repetitive sequences and centromeric satellite DNA, and measured the mRNA levels of six imprinted genes, Copg2, Mest, Igf2R, GNAS, SNRPN and Ube3a. The telomeres of the wrinkled cloned pigs were much shorter than those of the normal cloned pigs and age-matched normal pigs. In the wrinkled cloned pigs, SA-&#x003B2;-gal activity was detected and GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin were repressed. The mRNA levels of Mest, GNAS and Ube3a were reduced in the wrinkled cloned pigs, although there was no difference between the normal cloned pigs and normal controls. This gene expression analysis indicates that the wrinkled abnormality of our pigs originates from genetic abnormalities in the donor cells used for SCNT.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>senescence</kwd>
<kwd>cloned pigs</kwd>
<kwd>somatic cell nuclear transfer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Despite the successful production of cloned animals, including sheep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijmm-30-02-0383">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-ijmm-30-02-0383">2</xref>), cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijmm-30-02-0383">3</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijmm-30-02-0383">7</xref>), goats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijmm-30-02-0383">8</xref>), pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijmm-30-02-0383">9</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-ijmm-30-02-0383">11</xref>) and mice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijmm-30-02-0383">12</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijmm-30-02-0383">14</xref>), somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is still hampered by extremely low efficiency. Early embryonic and fetal loss, stillbirth, and postnatal loss and phenotypic abnormities are commonly reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijmm-30-02-0383">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijmm-30-02-0383">15</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-ijmm-30-02-0383">18</xref>). The fetal losses and abnormalities may be associated with abnormal placental development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijmm-30-02-0383">17</xref>). Most cloned cows and mice lost prenatally and postnatally are associated with enlarged and dysfunctional placentas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijmm-30-02-0383">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19-ijmm-30-02-0383">19</xref>). It was recently proposed that the high rates of developmental failure and abnormalities may be caused by epigenetic alterations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijmm-30-02-0383">20</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21-ijmm-30-02-0383">21</xref>). After SCNT, the donor nucleus requires epigenetic reprogramming to re-enter a totipotent ground state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22-ijmm-30-02-0383">22</xref>), suggesting that the donor nucleus must cease its own program of gene expression and restore the particular program of embryonic expression necessary for normal development. If the reprogramming process is inefficient, embryogenesis will be abnormal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23-ijmm-30-02-0383">23</xref>). Poor epigenetic reprogramming in early-cleavage embryos results in dysregulation of gene expression and abnormal proteins accumulate that can disrupt normal embryonic or fetal development. Indeed, along with the low survival rate, various disease phenotypes have been observed in cloned animals, including circulatory distress, placental edema, hydrallantois, respiratory problems, immune dysfunction and brain malformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijmm-30-02-0383">17</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-ijmm-30-02-0383">18</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b24-ijmm-30-02-0383">24</xref>). In theory, therefore, partial reprogramming can result in a range of outcomes, including abnormal phenotypes or lethality at various stages of development.</p>
<p>Epigenetic modifications of the genome include changes in genomic methylation, the acetylation state of histones and the remodeling of chromatin. DNA methylation regulates the function of the genome by affecting tissue-specific gene expression, cell differentiation, genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, regulation of chromatin structure, carcinogenesis and aging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b25-ijmm-30-02-0383">25</xref>). Recently, Kang <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26-ijmm-30-02-0383">26</xref>) reported that methylation levels of repeated regions and unique sequences were much higher in cloned morulae and blastocysts than in normal embryos and resembled the methylation levels in the donor cell genome. Interphase nuclei in cloned bovine morulae also contain high methylation levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27-ijmm-30-02-0383">27</xref>), indicating that reprogramming is deficient in most cloned preimplantation embryos and demethylation seems to be particularly inefficient. The selective demethylation pattern of developmentally important genes was confirmed in SCNT embryos. Unequal methylation was maintained between the inner cell mass and trophectoderm regions, thereby resulting in placental dysfunction in cloned animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28-ijmm-30-02-0383">28</xref>).</p>
<p>Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism by which related genes are inherited in a parental-specific manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29-ijmm-30-02-0383">29</xref>). Imprinted genes have roles in prenatal growth, development of the germ line and embryo and behavior, as well as being implicated in human disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30-ijmm-30-02-0383">30</xref>). The evolution of genomic imprinting must have required oocytes to create and maintain the epigenetic asymmetry of donor cells and the importance of the oocyte cytoplasm can be seen in the parent-of-origin effects on interspecific hybrids of the deer mouse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31-ijmm-30-02-0383">31</xref>). The disruption of imprinting may be due to nuclear to nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility between the nucleus of the donor and the cytoplasm of the recipient in these crosses. Cloning inefficiency also contributes to another incompatibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32-ijmm-30-02-0383">32</xref>): reduced fetal methylation and repression of ovine IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth. Preimplantation embryo procedures may thus be vulnerable to epigenetic alterations in imprinted genes. Kato <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b33-ijmm-30-02-0383">33</xref>) has shown that transplantation of imprint-free primordial germ cell nuclei into oocytes results in embryonic lethality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b33-ijmm-30-02-0383">33</xref>) and partially abnormal extraembryonic tissues resulting from the inappropriate silencing or activation of imprinted genes.</p>
<p>Cloning by SCNT is a multiple-step procedure and many factors affect cloning efficiency, such as donor cell type and age, the phase of the cell cycle that the donor cell is in and the SCNT procedure itself. Although the SCNT procedure has been improved, developmental defects are still consistently observed in cloned animals. These defects may be related to methodological faults including squeezing to remove nuclear, activation and fusion, which cause the instability of critical reprogramming.</p>
<p>We have generated three cloned pigs that developed wrinkles on their bodies, a phenotype typical of aged animals, at a relatively young age. Here, we report that this phenotype is due to a genetic abnormality of the donor cells rather than to senescence or epigenetic abnormalities during reprogramming.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Preparation of donor cells</title>
<p>Two types of fetal fibroblasts &#x0005B;named s-pig fetal fibroblasts (sPFFs) and w-pig fetal fibro-blasts (wPFFs)&#x0005D; were isolated from pig fetuses (on Day 30 of gestation) obtained from a slaughterhouse on different days as it has been described before (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b34-ijmm-30-02-0383">34</xref>). Briefly, collected fetuses were washed 3 times with Ca<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>- and Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>-free phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The head and internal organs were discarded by scooping them out with two watchmaker&#x02019;s forceps. After 2 washes with PBS (pH 7.4), the carcass was minced with a surgical blade in a 100&#x003C0; culture dish (Becton-Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ). The minced fetal tissues were dissociated in Dulbecco&#x02019;s modified Eagle&#x02019;s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 0.25&#x00025; (w/v) trypsin and 1 mM EDTA for 1&#x02013;2 h. The trypsinized cells were then washed once in PBS by centrifugation at 300 x g for 10 min and subsequently seeded into 100-mm culture dishes. The cells were cultured for 6&#x02013;8 days in DMEM supplemented with 10&#x00025; (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1&#x00025; (v/v) nonessential amino acids and 10 &#x003BC;g/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in a humidified atmosphere of 5&#x00025; CO2 and 95&#x00025; air. After the unattached clumps of cells and explants were removed, the attached cells were further cultured until confluent, subcultured at intervals of 5&#x02013;7 days by trypsinization and stored after 2 passages in liquid nitrogen at &#x02212;196&#x000B0;C. The freezing medium consisted of 80&#x00025; (v/v) DMEM, 10&#x00025; (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) and 10&#x00025; (v/v) FBS. Before SCNT, frozen fetal fibroblasts (cultured for 3&#x02013;5 passages) were thawed for 3&#x02013;5 days in DMEM supplemented with 0.5&#x00025; FBS. Individual cells were retrieved from the monolayer by trypsinization for 30 sec and used as donor cells for SCNT.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Production of cloned pigs</title>
<p>The nuclear transfer of donor cells to enucleated porcine oocytes was performed to produce cloned piglets as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35-ijmm-30-02-0383">35</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b36-ijmm-30-02-0383">36</xref>). wPFFs produced normal cloned pigs when used as donor nuclei and sPFFs produced the wrinkled cloned pigs. A parentage analysis was performed on the piglets obtained by SCNT and the surrogate recipient females to confirm the identity of the donor cells used for nuclear transfer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35-ijmm-30-02-0383">35</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b36-ijmm-30-02-0383">36</xref>). The DNA was extracted from ear punches or tail clippings obtained from each newborn piglet and recipient female. DNA was also extracted from donor cells. Eight porcine DNA microsatellite markers (S0086, S0230, SW902, S0007, S0313, SW61, S0005 and S0164) were used to confirm the genetic identity.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurement of telomere length</title>
<p>Telomere length was determined by mean terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length analysis using a Telo TAGGG Telomere Length Assay kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The genomic DNA (10 &#x003BC;g) isolated from donor cells or ear tissues of cloned pigs was digested with the restriction enzymes <italic>Hinf</italic>I (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) and <italic>Rsa</italic>I (New England Biolabs, Inc.). Undigested or digested genomic DNA samples were fractionated by 0.6&#x00025; agarose gel electrophoresis at 30 V/cm for 5 h. Gels were denatured, neutralized and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Hybond&#x0002B;; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Canada). The membranes were prehybridized in 40 ml of DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) for 2 h at 42&#x000B0;C and then hybridized in 10 ml of DIG Easy Hyb containing 50 pmol of an end-labeled telomere-specific probe for 16 h at 42&#x000B0;C. Membranes were washed 3 times in 50 ml of 0.5X standard saline citrate (SSC; 1X SSC: 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) for 15 min at room temperature. The signals were visualized by chemiluminescence using a DIG Luminescent Detection kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and exposed to X-ray film (Hyperfilm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The signals were scanned and analyzed using Gel Doc software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) by taking the mean value of the largest and smallest values.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture and induction of cellular senescence</title>
<p>sPFFs were routinely cultured until replicative senescence as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b38-ijmm-30-02-0383">38</xref>). The slowly growing cultures were replenished with fresh DMEM supplemented with 10&#x00025; FBS every 4 days. Confluent sPFFs were exposed to 700 &#x003BC;M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in DMEM containing 10&#x00025; FBS for 5 days as a stressor. After H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> stress for 5 days, the sPFFs were rinsed with PBS and incubated in DMEM with 10&#x00025; FBS.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Galactosidase (Gal) staining in skin tissues</title>
<p>Tissue was collected from the ear skin of cloned pigs, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and mounted in OCT compound (Fisher Scientific). Thin sections (10 &#x003BC;m) were cut and mounted onto glass slides. The sections were washed in PBS, fixed for 3&#x02013;5 min at room temperature in 3&#x00025; formaldehyde, washed again and incubated at 37&#x000B0;C with fresh senescence associated Gal (SA-Gal) stain solution &#x0005B;1 mg of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoly-D-galactoside (X-Gal)/ml of solution containing 40 mM citric acid/sodium phosphate (pH 6.0), 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>&#x0005D;. Stain signals were evident after 2&#x02013;4 h and maximal after 12&#x02013;16 h.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA</title>
<p>All procedures for genomic DNA preparation have been described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b37-ijmm-30-02-0383">37</xref>). The genomic DNA was digested with <italic>Hind</italic>III enzyme in a 20-&#x003BC;l reaction volume for 16 h, then denatured with 0.3 N NaOH. Bisulfite modification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b38-ijmm-30-02-0383">38</xref>) was initiated by adding 235 &#x003BC;l freshly made 5 M sodium bisulfite (pH 5, Sigma) and 13.5 &#x003BC;l of 10 mM hydroquinone. The reaction mixture was incubated at 55&#x000B0;C for 16 h in the dark. The bisulfite-treated genomic DNA was recovered using a Wizard DNA purification kit (Promega). Desulfonation was performed by adding 0.3 N NaOH and incubating the solution at 37 &#x000B0;C for 30 min. Following precipitation, the DNA was resuspended in 20 &#x003BC;l of distilled water.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, cloning and sequencing</title>
<p>To amplify the satellite region (GenBank<sup>&#x02122;</sup> Z75640) and the PRE-1 sequence (GenBankTM X64127, Y00104 and AJ251914), we performed PCR with ear tissues using 2 &#x003BC;l of the bisulfite-converted genomic DNA as a template. The primer set used for the satellite region was 5&#x02032;-TTTGTAGAATGTAGTTTTTAGAAG-3&#x02032; and 5&#x02032;-AAAATCT AAACTACCTCTAACTC-3&#x02032;. The amplification cycle was 45 cycles at 94 &#x000B0;C for 60 sec, 55&#x000B0;C for 60 sec and 72&#x000B0;C for 20 sec and the amplification was finished by incubation at 72&#x000B0;C for 10 min. For amplification of the PRE-1 sequence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b41-ijmm-30-02-0383">41</xref>), a primer set of 5&#x02032;-TTAACRAATCCRACTAAAAACCAT A-3&#x02032; and 5&#x02032;-GTTGGTTTATMTTAGAGTTATAGTAA-3&#x02032; was designed. The amplification cycle was 45 cycles at 94&#x000B0;C for 60 sec, 52&#x000B0;C for 60 sec and 72&#x000B0;C for 20 sec, and the amplification was finished with one cycle of 72&#x000B0;C for 10 min. The PCR products after elution were cloned into a TOPO TA cloning vector (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Individual clones were sequenced using an automatic sequencer (ABI PRISM 377; Applied BioSystems).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>RNA isolation and semiquantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)</title>
<p>Tissues from normally fertilized pigs and cloned pigs were collected and minced. Total-RNAs were extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and used for the synthesis of a first-strand cDNA using a First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) after heating to 60&#x000B0;C for 10 min. The RT-PCR was semiquantitative in the linear portion of the exponential amplification for each gene. The oligonucleotide primers for the imprinted genes are shown in <xref rid="t1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The experiments were repeated at least 3 times with different sets of nuclear donor cells, ear tissue samples, <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilized or SCNT blastocysts (a total of 90 blastocysts). The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance and the protected least significant different test using general linear models in a statistical analysis system (SAS, version 8.1) program. The data are presented as means &#x000B1; SD. Differences among the treatments were determined to be significant where P-value &#x0003C;0.05.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>We produced cloned pigs using two types of fetal fibroblasts (sPFFs and wPFFs, which differed by the day on which the fetuses were obtained) as nuclear donor cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b35-ijmm-30-02-0383">35</xref>). At birth, the cloned pigs were healthy and were of normal weight, and the surface of skin and color appeared normal. At 2 years, however, we observed many wrinkles on the bodies of three cloned pigs the only ones obtained from sPFFs, which did not appear on age-matched normal pigs (<xref rid="f1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1B</xref>). The face around the nose and forehead was most wrinkled, the neck and ears were easily bent, and a line of wrinkles was present around the neck, ears, tail and legs. In contrast, age-matched normal pigs and normal cloned pigs showed normal smooth skin without wrinkles on these parts of the body (<xref rid="f1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>).</p>
<p>One of the important indications of senescence and successful reprogramming in SCNT animals is the telomere length. In our previous report (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b39-ijmm-30-02-0383">39</xref>), we measured telomere length in 15 cloned piglets, including the three wrinkled piglets and normal cloned pigs, and compared the lengths with those in donor somatic cells. The telomeres were longer in 1-day-old cloned piglets than in the nuclear donor cells and age-matched controls, suggesting that nuclear reprogramming resets the cellular age of donor cells after SCNT. Here, to determine whether the wrinkled phenotype is associated with the status of the genome or the age of the pigs, we compared the telomere lengths of the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs with those of age-matched normal pigs. First, telomere length was measured in adult pigs and newborn piglets to determine the normal reduction in length that occurs with biological and chronological aging. As expected, the 2-year-old adult pigs had shorter telomeres than the 1-day-old newborn piglets and the donor fibroblast cells. The telomeres were longer in the early cloned piglets (mean TRF length &#x0003D; 23.5&#x000B1;1.6 kb) than in donor fetal fibroblasts (mean TRF length &#x0003D; 21.3&#x000B1;1.1 kb; <xref rid="f2-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>); however, telomere length decreased over time in both normal and wrinkled cloned pigs. Normal cloned pigs &#x0003E;1.5-years-old had a mean telomere length of 19.6&#x000B1;2.3 kb, whereas wrinkled cloned pigs at the same age had shorter telomeres (mean TRF length &#x0003D; 18.7&#x000B1;0.6 kb) (P&#x0003C;0.05). Cloned pigs with or without wrinkles had shorter telomeres than age-matched normal pigs.</p>
<p>Along with telomere length analysis, we examined whether SA-&#x003B2;-gal activity, a biomarker of senescence, was present in our wrinkled cloned pigs. We first confirmed SA-&#x003B2;-gal staining in cells with replicative senescence (RS) or stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS). The SIPS-associated morphology of PFFs was obtained by treating cells with 700 &#x003BC;M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 5 days. For RS morphology, the cells were passaged every 7 days for &#x0003E;15 passages. The SIPS and RS cells had larger cell surfaces than the normal and early-passage PFFs (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>). After 10 passages, the cell growth declined markedly (data not shown). The senescent pig fibroblasts expressed SA-&#x003B2;-Gal (shown as blue staining), while the early-passage cells did not show SA-&#x003B2;-Gal activity.</p>
<p>To examine whether senescent cells accumulate <italic>in vivo</italic> after SCNT, we stained ear tissues from the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs, as well as age-matched normal pigs, for SA-&#x003B2;-Gal activity when they were &#x0003E;1.5-years-old. We examined the sections for both the frequency and identity of the positive cells. The hair follicles and associated sebaceous glands and ducts were used as positive controls for SA-&#x003B2;-Gal activity because these structures were stained with consistent frequency and intensity independent of age (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3Bb and c</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b40-ijmm-30-02-0383">40</xref>). In the dermis and epidermis of both the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs, SA-&#x003B2;-Gal staining was sparsely and randomly distributed (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3Bc&#x02013;f</xref>). The keratinous layers in the most peripheral region of sectioned tissue were also positive in both types of cloned pigs (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3Bd and e</xref>). In contrast, except for hair follicles, no blue precipitation was detected in the age-matched normal pigs (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3Ba and b</xref>).</p>
<p>Expression levels of GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin change with age in several cell and tissue types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b41-ijmm-30-02-0383">41</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b42-ijmm-30-02-0383">42</xref>); accordingly, they are not always a proper internal control for mRNA analyses regarding aging. We therefore used the level of 18S rRNA as a reference and the mRNA levels of GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin as biomarkers for senescence. We first performed semiquantitative RT-PCR with SIPS- and RS-associated cells. Less &#x003B2;-actin mRNA and GAPDH mRNA was observed in the RS and SIPS cells than in the control cells (<xref rid="f4-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref>). We then determined the mRNA levels of these genes in the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs. Tissues from age-matched normal pigs were used as a control. The normal and wrinkled cloned pigs displayed significantly less &#x003B2;-actin mRNA than the age-matched pigs (<xref rid="f4-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4B</xref>). GAPDH expression was also diminished in the cloned pigs. Although there were individual differences within each group, similar expression patterns were detected within the normal and wrinkled cloned groups.</p>
<p>We examined the methylation status of normal and wrinkled cloned pigs in order to determine whether the reprogramming process occurred during SCNT and whether the methylation pattern could contribute to the phenotypic abnormality. The pig euchromatic PRE-1 repetitive sequence, a subfamily of pig short interspersed element sequences, was chosen as a target for the methylation analysis. We characterized methylation patterns of the PRE-1 sequence using the bisulfite method. Bisulfite causes deamination of unmethylated cytosines to uridine, thereby allowing the discrimination of unmethylated and methylated cytosine residues through sequencing. Sixteen of the 21 CpG sites (78.6&#x000B1;25.8&#x00025;) in the PRE-1 sequence were methylated in the donor cells (<xref rid="f5-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5A</xref>). Hypomethylation was detected in the three wrinkled cloned pigs, where only 17/24 sites (72.1&#x000B1;15.3&#x00025;) were methylated. Then we examined the methylation patterns of satellite DNA sequences in pigs. A tiny difference in the methylation status of the satellite region was observed between the donor cells (96.7&#x000B1;5.84&#x00025;) and wrinkled cloned pigs (92.1&#x000B1;6.9&#x00025;). Since the donor cells used to produce normal cloned pigs were not available in this study, the methylation status in normal cloned pigs could not be directly compared with the donor cells. However, in normal cloned pigs, methylation was observed in 81.5&#x000B1;17.0&#x00025; and 88.0&#x000B1;0.84&#x00025; in both eucromatic PRE-1 repetitive sequences and centromeric satellite DNA. The status of the wrinkled cloned pigs was similar to that of the donor cells (<xref rid="f5-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5</xref>).</p>
<p>Because parent-specific monoallelic expression of imprinted genes is critically important for normal embryo development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b43-ijmm-30-02-0383">43</xref>), we determined the allelic pattern of imprinted genes in the wrinkled clones as well as in normal clones. However, few sequences of imprinted genes have been reported in the pig genome database. Therefore, we selected several imprinted genes whose DNA sequences are homologous between human and mouse. For PCR amplification, the primer set for each imprinted gene was designed from the consensus sequence and PCR products were directly sequenced. The PCR conditions, including annealing temperature, size of PCR products, primer sequences and the names of newly selected genes, are shown in <xref rid="t1-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>. Of the six imprinted genes, COPG2, SNRPN, MEST, GNAS1, UBE3A and IGF2R, all but IGF2R were newly identified in the pig. Using this information, relative transcript levels in the tissues of normal (control) pigs and the normal and wrinkled cloned pigs were estimated by quantitative RT-PCR (P&#x0003C;0.05). Four of the six imprinted genes had considerably reduced transcript levels in the two cloned groups compared to the normal age-matched pigs; however, the mRNA levels of SNRPN and GNAS were within the range of control levels. Although there were individual variations within each group, it appeared that there were lower amounts of Igf2R, Mest and Ube3a transcripts in the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs than in the normal pigs.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>We used SCNT to derive cloned pigs from two sets of donor cells, sPFFs and wPFFs. Although at birth the cloned pigs appeared normal, the pigs cloned from sPFFs started to show many deep wrinkles in their faces and bodies 2 years after birth. In a previous study, we reported on a cloned pig derived from fetal fibroblasts of an inbred miniature pig that had anal atresia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b44-ijmm-30-02-0383">44</xref>). However, we could not determine the cause of this malformation with just one case. Many studies have reported that developmental aberrancies are due to fully unsuccessful reprogramming from somatic cell nuclei to embryonic genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijmm-30-02-0383">20</xref>) or to the importance of donor cell selection and its preparation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijmm-30-02-0383">1</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-ijmm-30-02-0383">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijmm-30-02-0383">14</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b45-ijmm-30-02-0383">45</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b47-ijmm-30-02-0383">47</xref>). Here, we investigated whether the causes of the abnormal skin phenotype (body wrinkles) were derived from a genetic problem caused by donor specificity or from an epigenetic problem during reprogramming. First, we compared telomere length in wrinkled pigs with that of normal pigs and normal (unwrinkled) cloned pigs. In our previous studies, telomere length increased significantly in cloned pigs at birth. However, there was a dramatic shortening of the telomeres in the cloned pigs during growth and the time spent for SCNT (<xref rid="f2-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). These data suggest that aging may accelerate more quickly in the wrinkled cloned pigs and that, although there is no visible phenotype at early stages after birth, some error from the nuclear transfer is expressed during growth. Because telomere length is strongly influenced by many genetic and other factors, by itself it can be a poor indicator of aging or cell viability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b48-ijmm-30-02-0383">48</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b50-ijmm-30-02-0383">50</xref>). To confirm that the wrinkled phenotype is a phenotype of aging, we further examined biomarkers for senescence (aging), including senescence-associated &#x003B2;-galactosidase (SA-&#x003B2;-gal) activity and the expression of GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin. This specific type of the &#x003B2;-galactosidase enzyme is not expressed in young proliferating fibroblasts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b54-ijmm-30-02-0383">54</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b55-ijmm-30-02-0383">55</xref>). In our wrinkled cloned pigs and normal cloned pigs, positive SA-&#x003B2;-gal staining was clearly detected in the dermis and the epidermis. The outermost layer and hair follicles of sectioned tissue, known as the keratinous layers, were always positive for SA-&#x003B2;-gal in the age-matched normal pigs (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3Bb&#x02013;e, black arrow</xref>). GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin expression were also used as biomarkers for aging. Lowe <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b41-ijmm-30-02-0383">41</xref>) reported that GAPDH expression in skeletal muscles diminishes with age. In addition, Moe <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b42-ijmm-30-02-0383">42</xref>) suggested that GAPDH, &#x003B2;-actin and HPRT, but not 18S rRNA, are differentially expressed at different developmental processes. The decreased mRNA levels of GAPDH and &#x003B2;-actin provide genetic evidence for senescence in our cloned pigs, in addition to the morphological evidence of the abnormal wrinkled phenotype. However, because these markers were observed in both kinds of cloned pigs, the appearance of these senescence markers are not due to abnormal aging that is expressed in wrinkling of the skin but are due to the SCNT procedures and genetic material from donor cells.</p>
<p>It is conceivable that an aberrant sequence of reprogramming events, especially DNA methylation, leads to developmental problems in cloned animals. Previously, Kang <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26-ijmm-30-02-0383">26</xref>) reported that the methylation status of cloned donor genomes during cleavage was similar to that detected in fertilized counterparts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26-ijmm-30-02-0383">26</xref>). Interestingly, depending on their confirmed sequences, the methylation status of the PRE-1 and satellite DNA sequences was maintained in our wrinkled cloned pigs and showed few changes from those of the donor cells and complete reconstruction of genome status from donor. However, this is in contrast to observations in many previous studies. McKay <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b51-ijmm-30-02-0383">51</xref>) implicated aberrant DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases associated with aging, cancer and diseases of the cardiovascular and neurological systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b51-ijmm-30-02-0383">51</xref>). Accordingly, incomplete epigenetic changes in the donor genome alone might not be sufficient for the wrinkled phenotype of our cloned pigs and other complex factors may be required for this abnormality.</p>
<p>Given that the donor cells had identical methylation patterns, we examined whether the wrinkled phenotype of the cloned pigs was caused by abnormal imprinting. As shown in <xref rid="f6-ijmm-30-02-0383" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>, the reduction in the mRNA levels of Mest, Igf2R and Ube3a may be associated with the developmental failure or abnormal phenotypes of the resultant cloned animals. In previous reports, mutation of imprinted genes resulted in fetal growth abnormalities in cloned animals and human patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b52-ijmm-30-02-0383">52</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b53-ijmm-30-02-0383">53</xref>). Importantly, a substantial correlation was observed between the abnormal expression of any single imprinted gene and the degree of methylation in the promoter regions of the gene. However, the abnormalities observed in most clones result from the cumulative dysregulation of several imprinted genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b54-ijmm-30-02-0383">54</xref>). Consistent with the idea that a single imprinted gene could be insufficient to produce a substantial correlation with an abnormality, we showed that the repression of several imprinted genes does not make a critical contribution to the deep wrinkles in our cloned pigs. In conclusion, we showed that the abnormal wrinkled phenotype in our pigs cloned by SCNT was caused by a genetic abnormality of the donor cells, suggesting that the differentiation status of the donor cell affects the developmental potential of cloned animals. Therefore, although it is also important that donor cells be accurately reprogrammed to early-stage cells, the selection of good-quality donor cells is the ultimate challenge for successful cloning by SCNT.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>This study was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (no. PJ008323), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilmut</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Schnieke</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>McWhir</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kind</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>385</volume><fpage>810</fpage><lpage>813</lpage><year>1997</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>McWhir</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ritchie</surname><given-names>WA</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilmut</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>380</volume><fpage>64</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><year>1996</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cibelli</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Stice</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Golueke</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>280</volume><fpage>1256</fpage><lpage>1258</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tani</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Sotomaru</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>282</volume><fpage>2095</fpage><lpage>2098</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shiga</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujita</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirose</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasae</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Production of calves by transfer of nuclei from cultured somatic cells obtained from Japanese black bulls</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>527</fpage><lpage>535</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goto</surname><given-names>Y KK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kobayashi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Imai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin-noh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsujino</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuda</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakane</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kojima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Birth of cloned calves derived from cultured oviductal epithelial cells of a dairy cow</article-title><source>Anim Sci J</source><volume>70</volume><fpage>243</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamakuchi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Todoroki</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Six cloned calves produced from adult fibroblast cells after long-term culture</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>990</fpage><lpage>995</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baguisi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Behboodi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Melican</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer</article-title><source>Nat Biotechnol</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>456</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Onishi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwamoto</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Akita</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>289</volume><fpage>1188</fpage><lpage>1190</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Polejaeva</surname><given-names>IA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaught</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>407</volume><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Betthauser</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Forsberg</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Augenstein</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems</article-title><source>Nat Biotechnol</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>1055</fpage><lpage>1059</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wakayama</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yanagimachi</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cloning of male mice from adult tail-tip cells</article-title><source>Nat Genet</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wakayama</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shinkai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamashiro</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cloning of mice to six generations</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>407</volume><fpage>318</fpage><lpage>319</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wakayama</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Perry</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Zuccotti</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Yanagimachi</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>394</volume><fpage>369</fpage><lpage>374</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinclair</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilmut</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep</article-title><source>Rev Reprod</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>163</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chavatte-Palmer</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Heyman</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Renard</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cloning and associated physiopathology of gestation</article-title><source>Gynecol Obstet Fertil</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>633</fpage><lpage>642</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Roussel</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Cibelli</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Clinical and pathologic features of cloned transgenic calves and fetuses (13 case studies)</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>1451</fpage><lpage>1465</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Burghardt</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses</article-title><source>Biol Reprod</source><volume>63</volume><fpage>1787</fpage><lpage>1794</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niemann</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wrenzycki</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>53</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rideout</surname><given-names>WM</given-names><suffix>III</suffix></name><name><surname>Eggan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaenisch</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>293</volume><fpage>1093</fpage><lpage>1098</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>XC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Reprogramming of epigenetic inheritance by somatic cell nuclear transfer</article-title><source>Reprod Biomed Online</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>508</lpage><year>2004</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gurdon</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Colman</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The future of cloning</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>402</volume><fpage>743</fpage><lpage>746</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>23.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bestor</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cytosine methylation and the unequal developmental potentials of the oocyte and sperm genomes</article-title><source>Am J Hum Genet</source><volume>62</volume><fpage>1269</fpage><lpage>1273</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>24.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lanza</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name><name><surname>Cibelli</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Blackwell</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Extension of cell life-span and telomere length in animals cloned from senescent somatic cells</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>288</volume><fpage>665</fpage><lpage>669</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>25.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reik</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Maher</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Imprinting in clusters: lessons from Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome</article-title><source>Trends Genet</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>330</fpage><lpage>334</lpage><year>1997</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>26.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Koo</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Typical demethylation events in cloned pig embryos. Clues on species-specific differences in epigenetic reprogramming of a cloned donor genome</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>276</volume><fpage>39980</fpage><lpage>39984</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>27.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Stojkovic</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>13734</fpage><lpage>13738</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>28.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Koo</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos</article-title><source>EMBO J</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>1092</fpage><lpage>1100</lpage><year>2002</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>29.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tilghman</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The sins of the fathers and mothers: genomic imprinting in mammalian development</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>185</fpage><lpage>193</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>30.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferguson-Smith</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Surani</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Imprinting and the epigenetic asymmetry between parental genomes</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>293</volume><fpage>1086</fpage><lpage>1089</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>31.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vrana</surname><given-names>PB</given-names></name><name><surname>Fossella</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Matteson</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>del Rio</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>O&#x02019;Neill</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tilghman</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Genetic and epigenetic incompatibilities underlie hybrid dysgenesis in Peromyscus</article-title><source>Nat Genet</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>120</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>32.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>McEvoy</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Epigenetic change in IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth after sheep embryo culture</article-title><source>Nat Genet</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>154</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>33.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Rideout</surname><given-names>WM</given-names><suffix>3rd</suffix></name><name><surname>Hilton</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Barton</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsunoda</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Surani</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Developmental potential of mouse primordial germ cells</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>1823</fpage><lpage>1832</lpage><year>1999</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>34.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Improvement of a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>59</volume><fpage>1949</fpage><lpage>1957</lpage><year>2003</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>35.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Production of nuclear transfer-derived piglets using porcine fetal fibroblasts transfected with the enhanced green fluorescent protein</article-title><source>Biol Reprod</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>1060</fpage><lpage>1068</lpage><year>2003</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>36.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Production of transgenic cloned piglets from genetically transformed fetal fibroblasts selected by green fluorescent protein</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>63</volume><fpage>973</fpage><lpage>991</lpage><year>2005</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>37.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Koo</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos</article-title><source>Nat Genet</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>173</fpage><lpage>177</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>38.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Warnecke</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mann</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Frommer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bisulfite sequencing in preimplantation embryos: DNA methylation profile of the upstream region of the mouse imprinted H19 gene</article-title><source>Genomics</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>182</fpage><lpage>190</lpage><year>1998</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>39.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeon</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The analysis of telomere length and telomerase activity in cloned pigs and cows</article-title><source>Mol Reprod Dev</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>320</lpage><year>2005</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>40.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dimri</surname><given-names>GP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Basile</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>92</volume><fpage>9363</fpage><lpage>9367</lpage><year>1995</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>41.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lowe</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Degens</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Alway</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase varies with age in glycolytic muscles of rats</article-title><source>J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>B160</fpage><lpage>B164</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>42.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moe</surname><given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Ziliang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Barathi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Beuerman</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Differential expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta actin and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) in postnatal rabbit sclera</article-title><source>Curr Eye Res</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b43-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>43.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reik</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Walter</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>293</volume><fpage>1089</fpage><lpage>1093</lpage><year>2001</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b44-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>44.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Successful surgical correction of anal atresia in a transgenic cloned piglet</article-title><source>J Vet Sci</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>243</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><year>2005</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b45-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>45.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uhm</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>In vitro development of porcine enucleated oocytes reconstructed by the transfer of porcine fetal fibroblasts and cumulus cells</article-title><source>Theriogenology</source><volume>54</volume><fpage>559</fpage><lpage>570</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b46-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>46.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chesne</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Adenot</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name><name><surname>Viglietta</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Baratte</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Boulanger</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Renard</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells</article-title><source>Nat Biotechnol</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>366</fpage><lpage>369</lpage><year>2002</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b47-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>47.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kraemer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pryor</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A cat cloned by nuclear transplantation</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>415</volume><fpage>859</fpage><year>2002</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b48-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>48.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blackburn</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Telomere states and cell fates</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>408</volume><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><year>2000</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b49-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>49.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allsopp</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaziri</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Patterson</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Telomere length predicts replicative capacity of human fibroblasts</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>10114</fpage><lpage>10118</lpage><year>1992</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b50-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>50.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harley</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Human ageing and telomeres</article-title><source>Ciba Found Symp</source><volume>211</volume><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>144</lpage><year>1997</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b51-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>51.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McKay</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathers</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folate and DNA methylation during in utero development and aging</article-title><source>Biochem Soc Trans</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1006</fpage><lpage>1007</lpage><year>2004</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b52-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>52.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mann</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>YG</given-names></name><name><surname>Nolen</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name><name><surname>Verona</surname><given-names>RI</given-names></name><name><surname>Latham</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartolomei</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Disruption of imprinted gene methylation and expression in cloned preimplantation stage mouse embryos</article-title><source>Biol Reprod</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>902</fpage><lpage>914</lpage><year>2003</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b53-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>53.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chavatte-Palmer</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Expression of imprinted genes is aberrant in deceased newborn cloned calves and relatively normal in surviving adult clones</article-title><source>Mol Reprod Dev</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>438</lpage><year>2005</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b54-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>54.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Inoue</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohda</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Faithful expression of imprinted genes in cloned mice</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>297</fpage><year>2002</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b55-ijmm-30-02-0383"><label>55.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Milner</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cawston</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Matrix metalloproteinase knockout studies and the potential use of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in the rheumatic diseases</article-title><source>Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>363</fpage><lpage>375</lpage><year>2005</year></citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Table</title>
<fig id="f1-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic abnormalities found in 3 cloned pigs. To produce cloned piglets, we transferred the nuclei of donor cells to enucleated porcine oocytes. The normal cloned pigs were generated using wPFFs as donor cells and the wrinkled cloned-pigs were produced from sPFFs. Compared to age-matched normal (naturally fertilized) pigs, 3 pigs cloned by SCNT from sPFFs had many wrinkles on their bodies, including face, neck, legs and tail. (A) Age-matched normal pigs used as controls. At 2 years old, the normal pigs had smooth skin without wrinkles on the parts of the body that were wrinkled in the wrinkled cloned pigs. (B) Abnormal cloned pigs. To show distinct phenotypes, pictures taken (a&#x02013;f) without or (g&#x02013;i) with a flash are shown. (a, b, d, f and h) Also, the specific parts of the body are shown at high magnification to show the details of the specific abnormalities.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g00.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis of telomere length in the wrinkled cloned pigs. Telomere lengths in age-matched normal pigs at 1 day (N, newborn) and 2 years (A, adult) and donor fibroblasts isolated from a female fetus at 40 days of gestation (D, donor cells) were compared with those of the cloned pigs at two different stages, early (birth; lanes 1 to 3) and late (&#x0003E;2-years-old; lanes 4&#x02013;9). The wrinkled cloned pigs had much shorter telomeres than normal cloned pigs. Telomere length was determined by mean terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length analysis. Molecular weight (MW) markers are displayed in kb. Early Cl, cloned pigs at birth; late Cl, cloned pigs older than 2 years.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g01.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Senescence-associated &#x003B2;-galactosidase activity in cells and the tissues of cloned pigs. (A) SA-&#x003B2;-gal in cells. SA-&#x003B2;-gal stain (&#x02212;) refers to unlabeled cells and SA-&#x003B2;-gal stain (&#x0002B;) refers to cells labeled with SA-&#x003B2;-gal staining. Replicative senescence (RS) of pig fetal fibroblast cells (PFFs) was induced after long-term cell culture, and stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) was induced by treatment with subcytotoxic doses of HB<sub>2B</sub>OB<sub>2B</sub> for 5 days. Early-passage PFF cells were used as a control. The SA-&#x003B2;-gal&#x02013;positive cells are shown in the SIPS and RS cells in the lower panel. The cells were photographed at x100 magnification. (B) SA-&#x003B2;-gal staining in the ear tissues of cloned pigs. Ear tissues were sectioned, stained for SA-&#x003B2;-gal and photographed at magnification x40. All 6 cloned pigs were positive for SA-&#x003B2;-gal activity in the dermis and epidermis (c,d, normal cloned pigs; e,f, wrinkled cloned pigs). Keratinous layers were also positive for SA-&#x003B2;-gal in both kinds of cloned pigs (arrows in d,e). Keratinous layers contain many dead and aged cells. Moreover, SA-&#x003B2;-gal activity was always seen in the hair follicles and is frequently associated with sebaceous glands and eccrine glands and ducts. (a) However, no staining of SA-&#x003B2;-gal was observed in age-matched normal pigs, (arrow in b) except in the hair follicles stained as a positive control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g02.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The expression of biomarkers for senescence in the abnormal cloned pigs. Relative mRNA levels of &#x003B2;-actin and GAPDH, which are biomarkers for senescence, were measured by RT-PCR. 18S rRNA was used as a reference for semiquantitative RT-PCR, because 18S rRNA is not differentially expressed with age. (A) Gene expression and quantification of &#x003B2;-actin and GAPDH in aged cells (P&#x0003C;0.05). Less &#x003B2;-actin mRNA and GAPDH mRNA was observed in the RS and SIPS cells than in the control cells. (B) Gene expression and quantification of &#x003B2;-actin and GAPDH in normal cloned pigs, wrinkled cloned pigs and normal age-matched control pigs (P&#x0003C;0.05). The normal cloned and wrinkled cloned pigs had significantly less &#x003B2;-actin mRNA than the age-matched pigs. Although there were individual differences in each group, GAPDH expression was also diminished in the cloned pigs. PFF, pig fetal fibroblasts used as control cells; RS, replicative senescence cells; SIPS, stress-induced premature senescence cells.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g03.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The methylation status of PRE-1 and satellite DNA sequence in the cloned pigs and the donor fibroblast cells. The genomic DNA was digested with <italic>Hind</italic>III and denatured with 0.3 N NaOH. Bisulfite modification was initiated by adding 5 M sodium bisulfite and 10 mM hydroquinone. PCR was performed for the amplification of the satellite region and the PRE-1 sequence. (A) Schematic diagram of amplified PRE-1 sequences showing the location of CpG dinucleotides (closed circles). The methylation status of each CpG site was scored by sequencing the PCR clones derived from bisulfite-treated genomic DNAs. (B) Methylation profiles of CpG dinucleotides of satellite DNA sequences. Open and closed circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpGs, respectively. Some CpG sites were absent from the satellite region in the cloned pigs and donor fibroblasts due to mutations and variation of satellite region in the particular copies of the satellite sequences. The numbers indicate the proportion of methylated CpG sites relative to the total number of CpG sites counted.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g04.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The mRNA levels of imprinted genes in the cloned pigs. Total-RNAs were isolated from ear tissues of the abnormal cloned pigs and donor fibroblast cells. A quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a significant reduction in the mRNA levels of 6 imprinted genes (Copg2, Mest, Igf2R, GNAS, SNRPN and Ube3a). Except for Igf2R, none have previously been identified in pigs; they were obtained using homologous sequences in the mouse and human genes and confirmed by direct sequencing. The relative values were compared to the level of 18S rRNA as a reference in at least 3 individual experiments (P&#x0003C;0.05). Four of the imprinted genes had considerably lower mRNA levels in the 2 cloned groups than in the normal age-matched pigs; however, the mRNA levels of SNRPN and GNAS were within the range of control levels. The transcripts of Igf2R, Mest and Ube3a appeared to be lower in both the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs than in the normal pigs.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-30-02-0383-g05.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-ijmm-30-02-0383" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Oligo sequences of the primers used for RT-PCR of imprinting genes.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Genes</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Primer sequences</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Tm (&#x000B0;C)</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Size (bp)</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">COPG2</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">5&#x02032;-CAAGAAGGACGAGGAGTCTGGTAG-3&#x02032;<break/>5&#x02032;-CACTTGATGCAGCTTCTTGGGCTT-3&#x02032;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">544</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SNRPN</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">5&#x02032;-CGGGTTTTGGGTCTGGTGTTG-3&#x02032; <break/>5&#x02032;-ATAATGCCTGGAGGTGGGGTTGC-3&#x02032;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">380</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MEST</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">5&#x02032;-CCTTGATTTCTTAGGCTTTGGCTT-3&#x02032; <break/>5&#x02032;-CAGCGTTTTCCTGTACAGCTCCAA-3&#x02032;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">600</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">GNAS1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">5&#x02032;-GCCAACAAAAAGATCGAGAAGCAG-3&#x02032; <break/>5&#x02032;-CCACCTGGAACTTGGTCTCAAAGA-3&#x02032;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">582</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">UBE3A</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">5&#x02032;-GCATCTAATAGAACGCTACTACCA-3&#x02032; <break/>5&#x02032;-TTCCAGATATTCAGGACTGTGGAG-3&#x02032;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">818</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-ijmm-30-02-0383">
<p>The primer pairs to detect the mRNAs were first designed from the human and mouse homologous sequences. The PCR products were sequenced, and the resulting pig-specific sequences were used to create the primer pairs employed to measure the transcriptional levels of interested genes.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
