<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJMM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Molecular Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1107-3756</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-244X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ijmm.2013.1342</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijmm-31-06-1477</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Response of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast cancer stem/progenitor cells to tamoxifen- and doxorubicin-induced autophagy</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>YENIGUN</surname><given-names>VILDAN BETUL</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>OZPOLAT</surname><given-names>BULENT</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijmm-31-06-1477"/><xref rid="af2-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>KOSE</surname><given-names>GAMZE TORUN</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijmm-31-06-1477">
<label>1</label>Department of Genetics and Bioengineering, Yeditepe University, Istanbul 34755, 
<country>Turkey</country>;</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijmm-31-06-1477">
<label>2</label>Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, 
<country>USA</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijmm-31-06-1477">Correspondence to: Dr Bulent Ozpolat, Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA, E-mail: <email>bozpolat@mdanderson.org</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>06</month>
<year>2013</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2013</year></pub-date>
<volume>31</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>1477</fpage>
<lpage>1483</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2012</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2013</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2013, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<license-p>This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The cancer stem cell hypothesis emphasizes that cancers are driven by cells having stem cell properties, and it is believed that cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be responsible for resistance against therapeutic approaches and for recurrent tumors. Since the biology of the normal breast requires large numbers of stem cells, it has been thought that breast stem cells play an important role in initiating breast cancer. A better characterization of breast CSCs appears to be an essential step to improve the understanding of the biology of breast cancer and its management. The scope of this study was to isolate breast CSCs from a breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) using cell surface markers, and to test whether these cells have any resistance to autophagic cell death mechanisms mediated by commonly used chemotherapies and hormonal therapies such as doxorubicin (adriamycin) and tamoxifen (anti-estrogen), respectively. For this purpose, the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> MCF-7 breast cancer stem/progenitor cell population was isolated and treated with doxorubicin or tamoxifen and evaluated for their response to growth, autophagy and apoptosis. Our findings suggest that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells were less sensitive to doxorubicin, but did not demonstrate a significant difference towards tamoxifen in regards to the induction of autophagy.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>breast cancer stem cells</kwd>
<kwd>tamoxifen</kwd>
<kwd>doxorubicin</kwd>
<kwd>autophagy</kwd>
<kwd>apoptosis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortalities among women after lung cancer. Since 1896, clinical and experimental studies have supported the idea that breast cancer is a classical model of a hormone-dependent malignancy and that estrogens are mammary carcinogens. Estrogen plays an important role in the growth and differentiation of the normal mammary gland. The effects of estrogens are mediated by the intracellular estrogen receptors (ERs) and ER&#x003B1; is mostly found in the uterus and mammary gland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijmm-31-06-1477">1</xref>). ER is a transcription activator and binds to the estrogen response element of the target gene activating gene transcription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-ijmm-31-06-1477">2</xref>). It has been noted that estrogen administration enhances tumor growth while estrogen deprivation reduces tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijmm-31-06-1477">3</xref>); therefore, elevated levels of estrogen in the body are a risk factor for breast cancer.</p>
<p>Breast cancer treatments include chemotherapy, hormone therapy as well as surgery and radiotherapy depending on the stage. Doxorubicin and tamoxifen are widely used drugs in chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, respectively. The exact mechanism of how doxorubicin works is complex, but it is thought that it interacts with DNA, prevents the DNA double helix from being resealed and stops the process of replication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-ijmm-31-06-1477">4</xref>). Previous studies including ours have shown that doxorubicin induces autophagy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijmm-31-06-1477">5</xref>). Tamoxifen is an estrogen receptor antagonist which competes with estrogen to bind to its receptor. The estrogen receptor/tamoxifen complex stops the genes being switched on by estrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-ijmm-31-06-1477">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijmm-31-06-1477">7</xref>). Studies have shown that tamoxifen induces autophagy and apoptotic cell death in estrogen-positive breast cancer cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijmm-31-06-1477">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijmm-31-06-1477">9</xref>).</p>
<p>Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are cancer cells that possess the characteristics of normal stem cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-ijmm-31-06-1477">10</xref>). The cancer stem cell hypothesis proposes that tumors are initiated and maintained by a small fraction of cells, but the origin of these tumorigenic cells are actually not known. The stem cell theory of cancer proposes two major concepts. One theory claims that CSCs arise from mutated stem cells and then these mutated cells expand in such a manner that the mutation is shared by many of the descendants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-ijmm-31-06-1477">11</xref>). An alternative theory proposes that transformed and differentiated cells acquire stem cell-like characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijmm-31-06-1477">12</xref>). This hypothesis is also known as epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT).</p>
<p>The development of the mammary gland suggests that stem cells play an important role in the biology of the breast. This fact suggests that the mammary gland is also particularly prone to carcinogenesis, and that breast stem cells play a very important role in breast cancer. CSCs also have been described in breast cancers. The CSC hypothesis in breast cancer assumes that CSCs can generate cells with a certain type of aberrant and limited differentiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>). Conventional therapies used at present such as chemotherapy and radiation kill the growing differentiated cells but fail to kill these cancer-initiating cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijmm-31-06-1477">14</xref>). The reason is assumed that CSCs share the properties of normal stem cells which have mechanisms that make them relatively resistant to chemotherapy. These properties include resistance to drugs and toxins by expression of several ABC transporters, increased expression of BcL-2 family proteins, increased expression of pumps such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijmm-31-06-1477">15</xref>) and P-glycoprotein (PGP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-ijmm-31-06-1477">16</xref>) and active DNA repair capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>). In addition, stem cells divide infrequently in contrast to differentiated cells, and antimitotic chemotherapies are less effective against stem cells than mature cancer cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>). Moreover, stem cells survive, grow and form colonies as tumorospheres in serum-free suspension, while more differentiated cells die under these conditions. In solid tumors, it has been shown that only a small proportion of the tumor cells are able to form colonies as revealed by <italic>in vitro</italic> clonogenic assays (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijmm-31-06-1477">17</xref>).</p>
<p>It has been proposed that CSCs are able to be isolated from breast cancer cell lines using specific cell markers, CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-ijmm-31-06-1477">18</xref>). CD44 is a stem cell marker that is common to different organs and pathologies. However, the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> phenotype is probably tissue restricted. Al-Hajj <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19-ijmm-31-06-1477">19</xref>) used these cell-surface markers to isolate a subpopulation of highly tumorigenic breast cancer cells from human breast tumor. In breast cancer, a population of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells is considered to be highly enriched in cancer-initiating cells which are 1,000 times more tumorigenic than other cell populations, and injection of as few as 200 cells was found to lead to tumor formation in SCID mice .</p>
<p>Autophagy is a tightly regulated process involving the degradation of a cell&#x02019;s own components through the lysosomal machinery. Autophagy plays a normal part in cell growth, development, and homeostasis, helping to maintain a balance between the synthesis, degradation, and the subsequent recycling of cellular products. During nutrient starvation, autophagy leads to the breakdown of non-vital components and the release of nutrients to maintain metabolism and ATP levels to ensure cell survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijmm-31-06-1477">20</xref>). In addition, the autophagylysosomal pathway is an important mechanism for regulating the homeostasis of intracellular long-lived proteins and organelles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21-ijmm-31-06-1477">21</xref>). Moreover, autophagy plays a role in innate and adaptive immune responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22-ijmm-31-06-1477">22</xref>). During apoptosis, induced autophagy can be either a protective mechanism or a process that causes cell death. Recent studies have shown that autophagy delays apoptotic death in noninvasive breast cancer cells following DNA damage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23-ijmm-31-06-1477">23</xref>). On the other hand, in the absence of apoptosis, autophagy can trigger a form of cell death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b24-ijmm-31-06-1477">24</xref>). A previous study also demonstrated that prolonged autophagy in the absence apoptotic machinery is a cell survival mechanism that delays cell death in hematopoietic cells when growth factors and nutrients are short in supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b25-ijmm-31-06-1477">25</xref>). Malfunctioning of autophagy is observed in many human diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative, infectious and inflammatory diseases, heart diseases and diabetes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26-ijmm-31-06-1477">26</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27-ijmm-31-06-1477">27</xref>).</p>
<p>Understanding the role of CSCs during carcinogenesis has become a major focus in stem cell biology and cancer research. Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate breast CSCs and test whether these cells show resistance to hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) similar to their resistance shown to chemotherapy. For that purpose, CSCs were tested initially for their chemotherapy resistance using doxorubicin. The possible autophagic cell death mechanism was then assessed in breast CSCs after they were treated with tamoxifen.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Culture of MCF-7 cells</title>
<p>MCF-7 cells were kindly provided by Osmangazi University Medical School and cultured in Dulbecco&#x02019;s modified Eagle&#x02019;s medium (DMEM)/F12 GlutaMAX containing 10&#x00025; fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1&#x00025; penicillin-streptomycin (PS) solution (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>g/ml streptomycin). Cells were grown in T-25 flasks with 4 ml medium and incubated in a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator at 37&#x000B0;C in 5&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub>. The medium of the cells was replaced every other day, and cells were passaged when they reached confluence.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Isolation of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs</title>
<p>MCF-7 cells were detached from the flask by treatment with trypsin-EDTA solution, and the cells were centrifuged. After cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4), the cell pellet was resuspended in FITC-conjugated CD44 antibody (BD Pharmingen, USA) and PE-conjugated CD24 antibody (BioLegend, USA). The antibody concentration was 10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l of antibody solution per 1&#x000D7;10<sup>6</sup> cells. Cells were incubated with the antibodies for 40 min at room temperature (RT) in the dark. Unbound antibodies were washed off with PBS, and the cell pellet was resuspended in culture medium after centrifugation to be sorted. The cells were sorted by a fluorescence-activated cell sorting device (FACSAria II; BD Pharmingen).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of the growth rate of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells</title>
<p>CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells were seeded into 24-well plates. At 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation times, the values of the growth rates were determined by a cell proliferation assay. Culture medium was mixed with MTS One Solution (Promega, USA) at a ratio of 5:1, and 240 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l of this mix was added into each well. Cells were incubated for 2.5 h at 37&#x000B0;C in a CO<sub>2</sub> incubator. Then, 200 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l of solution from each well was transferred into a 96-well plate. Absorbances were measured at 490 nm.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Determination of the inhibitory concentrations of tamoxifen and doxorubicin</title>
<p>CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells (1,250 cells/well) were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate, and different concentrations of tamoxifen and doxorubicin were applied to the cells one day later by diluting the drugs with culture medium. Following 72 h of drug treatment, the MTS experiment was performed. Culture medium was mixed with MTS One Solution at a ratio of 5:1, and 120 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l of MTS/culture medium was added to each well. The cells were incubated with the solution for 2 h at 37&#x000B0;C. Then, absorbances were measured at 490 nm.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of apoptosis by Annexin V staining and flow cytometry</title>
<p>The FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit II (BD Pharmingen) was used to detect apoptotic cell death in the tamoxifen- and doxorubicin-treated cells incubated for 48 h. Untreated and drug-treated CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells were detached from the flasks. Cells were transferred to FACS tubes, washed with PBS and centrifuged. The cell pellets were dissolved in 5 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l Annexin V and 5 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l propidium iodide (PI) solution and incubated at RT for 20 min in the dark. Meanwhile, 1 ml binding buffer was diluted with 9 ml PBS. Then, 400 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l diluted binding buffer was added into each FACS tube and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of autophagy by flow cytometry</title>
<p>Tamoxifen- and doxorubicin-treated CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells and untreated cells were detached from flasks following 48 h of treatment and transferred to FACS tubes. Acridine orange (1 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l; Sigma-Aldrich Co., Germany) was mixed with 10 ml culture medium. The mixture (1 ml) was added into each tube after they were centrifuged. The cell pellets were resuspended in the acridine orange staining solution and incubated at 37&#x000B0;C for 15 min. The cell pellets were then washed with PBS, and finally the cell pellets were resuspended in 300 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l PBS to be analyzed by flow cytometry.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Western blot analysis of the LC3 protein</title>
<p>Both MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells were seeded, and one day later they were treated with tamoxifen and doxorubicin, respectively. At 48 h, treated and control cells were collected by trypsinization, washed with PBS, and the pellets were lysed with 100&#x02013;150 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>l lysis buffer. The protein concentration of the lysates was determined with Coomassie protein assay reagent (Thermo Scientific, USA) following the manufacturer&#x02019;s instructions. Subsequently, 20 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>g protein of each sample was loaded onto a 12&#x00025; separating acrylamide gel. After blotting, the membrane was incubated with LC3 (Axxora Nanotools, Germany) and &#x003B2;-actin (Cell Signaling, Technology, Inc., USA) primary antibodies at a concentration of 1 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>g/ml at 4&#x000B0;C. On the next day, the membrane was then incubated with the secondary antibody at a dilution of 1:10,000 for 1 h at RT with gentle agitation. Finally, the membrane was washed with TBST and then incubated with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific) for 5 min. Images of the proteins were captured with a molecular imager (ChemiDoc XRS&#x0002B;; Bio-Rad, USA) at a suitable time (change with respect to the primary antibody).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Determination of the half maximal inhibitory concentrations of tamoxifen and doxorubicin</title>
<p>The initial step for evaluating the effect of tamoxifen and doxorubicin on isolated breast CSCs was to determine the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) of the drugs. Cell proliferation assay (MTS) was used to determine the IC<sub>50</sub> of each drug by treating the MCF-7 cells with different concentations. Following 72 h of treatment, the results showed that the IC<sub>50</sub> of tamoxifen and doxorubicin in MCF-7 cells was &#x0223C;10 and 0.65 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M, respectively (<xref rid="f1-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). Therefore, 10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen and 0.7 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M doxorubicin were used for the subsequent experiments. Moreover, we found that tamoxifen-induced effects on apoptosis and autophagy were significant at 48 h in the MCF-7 cells. For this reason, both tamoxifen and doxorubicin were incubated with the cells for 48 h.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Isolation of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells</title>
<p>Different techniques for the isolation of the breast CSC population have been used. In this study, breast CSCs were isolated from the breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) using specific cell markers. These isolated cells were positive for CD44 and negative/low for CD24 markers. CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells were sorted from the MCF-7 cells using CD44 and CD24 antibodies at the same time. At the end, it was observed that there were &#x0223C;32&#x00025; CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> cells and 23&#x00025; CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells in the MCF-7 cells. Overall, there was &#x0223C;1&#x00025; CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells present in the MCF-7 cell line (<xref rid="f2-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;</sup> cells were used immediately following sorting since they start to lose their properties by half in 5 days.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of the growth rate of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells and MCF-7 cells</title>
<p>CSCs display particular features; one of which is slow cell growth. To test this parameter, cell cycle rates of sorted cells and parental cells were compared. The proliferation assay results demonstrated that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells proliferated slower than the MCF-7 cells when they were allowed to grow for 96 h (<xref rid="f3-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of tamoxifen and doxorubicin on the cell proliferation of MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells</title>
<p>Previous studies have shown that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells show resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Based on these studies, we tested the sorted cells for resistance to chemotherapy using doxorubicin and evaluated their viability by MTS cell proliferation assay. We compared CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells to MCF-7 cells after treatment using the same drug. Moreover, the same procedures were also performed to evaluate the effects of tamoxifen in this CSC population.</p>
<p>Both isolated breast CSCs and parental cells were treated with doxorubicin for 48 h. Proliferation assay results demonstrated that the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells were less sensitive to doxorubicin when compared to MCF-7 cells when these cells were treated with concentrations at 0.5, 0.7 and 1 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M (<xref rid="f4-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref>). In contrast, the proliferation assay results of tamoxifen experiments revealed that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells did show a slight resistance to tamoxifen when compared to the MCF-7 cells (<xref rid="f4-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4B</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Induction of apoptosis and autophagy in CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells by doxorubicin and tamoxifen</title>
<p>In addition to the proliferation assay, we carried out experiments to ascertain whether CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs exhibit resistance to apoptosis or autophagy in response to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Both sorted and parental cells were treated with doxorubicin and tamoxifen, and then stained by Annexin V and PI for detection of apoptosis and acridine orange for the autophagy studies. The cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry. Flow cytometric results demonstrated that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells underwent &#x0223C;10&#x00025; less apoptotic cell death comparing to the MCF-7 parental cells following treatment with doxorubicin (<xref rid="f5-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5A</xref>), supporting the results of the cell proliferation assay. Therefore, the results of the doxorubicin studies revealed that breast CSCs exhibit slight resistance to apoptosis following treatment with chemotherapy drugs. With respect to autophagy, on the other hand, CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells did not show any resistance to doxorubicin as indicated by acridine orange stain and flow cytometric analysis when compared to the MCF-7 cells (<xref rid="f5-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5B</xref>).</p>
<p>In the case of tamoxifen, CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells did not show any difference in terms of resistance to tamoxifen when compared to the parental MCF-7 cells (<xref rid="f5-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5C and D</xref>). The apoptosis and autophagy results of the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells and MCF-7 cells were similar.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of tamoxifen in CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> and MCF-7 cells in respect to the autophagy marker LC3</title>
<p>In order to observe whether tamoxifen has a differential effect on autophagy in sorted CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs compared to the parental MCF-7 cells, we analyzed LC3-I and II protein by western blotting. Tamoxifen induced autophagy in both CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs and MCF-7 cells at 48 h (<xref rid="f6-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>). LC3-I (18 kDa) to LC3-II (16 kDa) conversion was clearly visualized in the treated cells. Densitometric analysis of the LC3-II bands of the samples was carried out by ImageJ program (<xref rid="t1-ijmm-31-06-1477" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). According to these results, 10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen induced more extensive autophagic cell death in both the sorted and parental cells when compared to the untreated and 8 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M drug-treated cells. However, the breast CSCs did not show a significant difference in the extent of autophagic cell death when compared to the MCF-7 cells.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>CSCs were first described by the evidence that the growth and propagation of leukemia were driven by a small population of leukemia cells that have the ability for continual self-renewal, and these cells were termed as CSCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>). Later, it was proposed that inhibition of tumor stem cells could prevent the recurrence of leukemia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28-ijmm-31-06-1477">28</xref>). Since that time, CSCs have been recognized as important components in carcinogenesis and have been isolated from many types of cancers including breast, brain, skin, head and neck and thyroid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>).</p>
<p>The objective of this study was to isolate breast CSCs from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line and ascertain whether these isolated cells exhibit a difference in the autophagic response to tamoxifen-based hormonal therapy, which is used to treat &#x0223C;50&#x02013;60&#x00025; of breast cancer patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijmm-31-06-1477">8</xref>). For that purpose, breast CSCs were isolated from MCF-7 cells by using CD44 and CD24 markers. Sorting results showed that only 1&#x00025; of MCF-7 cells had CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast cancer stem cell markers. This finding corroborated the results of Al-Hajj <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19-ijmm-31-06-1477">19</xref>) who also reported the presence of &#x0223C;1&#x00025; of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells in the MCF-7 cell line. Moreover, we observed that the sorted cells started to lose their CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> properties by half in &#x0223C;5 days. Wright <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29-ijmm-31-06-1477">29</xref>) also demonstrated that these sorted cells did not exhibit the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> and CD24<sup>&#x02212;</sup> stem cell markers and lost chemotherapy drug resistance compared to parental cells when they were passaged four times as a monolayer.</p>
<p>Slow growth rate is a well-known parameter of breast CSCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477">13</xref>). To ensure that our isolated cells carry stem cell features, we tested and demonstrated that sorted breast CSCs proliferated slower than the parental cells, as supported by Fillmore and Kuperwasser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30-ijmm-31-06-1477">30</xref>). Moreover, Kim <italic>et al</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31-ijmm-31-06-1477">31</xref>) sorted CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells from MCF-7 cells and compared the proliferation rate of these cells with the parental and the growth of CD24<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> cells by growing them for 72 h in DMEM. Their result revealed that the numbers of cultured CD24<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> and parental cells were higher than that in the CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells. These results reveal that CD24<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> and MCF-7 cells have a higher proliferative capacity than CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells and suggest that the expression of CD24 may enhance the growth and proliferation of MCF-7 cells.</p>
<p>It is known that both chemotherapy and radiation kill growing differentiated cells. Conventional chemotherapies are initially effective in controlling tumor growth. However, many patients relapse over time. One explanation for relapse is that cells which have a high tumorigenic potential are resistant to therapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32-ijmm-31-06-1477">32</xref>). Resistance of CSCs, including breast CSCs toward chemotherapy drugs and radiation has been shown (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijmm-31-06-1477">14</xref>). Specifically, a previous study showed that CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs were more resistant to chemotherapy drugs than the parental cells when the cells were treated for 48 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29-ijmm-31-06-1477">29</xref>). Therefore, we tested the effect of doxorubicin on our sorted CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells which were described as a highly tumorigenic subpopulation of breast cancer cells. Proliferation results demonstrated that sorted cells consisted of more viable cells comparing to the MCF-7 cells when these cells were treated with 0.5, 0.7 and 1 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M doxorubicin. In addition, flow cytometric results revealed that apoptotic cell death was &#x0223C;10&#x00025; less in the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells than that in the MCF7 cells when treated with 0.7 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M doxorubicin for 48 h, while the autophagic cell death ratio remained the same.</p>
<p>Tamoxifen is an FDA approved drug for the prevention and the treatment of breast cancer. For many years, it has been used as endocrine therapy for the treatment of both early and advanced breast cancer for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Studies have shown that tamoxifen induces autophagy and apoptotic cell death in estrogen-positive breast cancer cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijmm-31-06-1477">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijmm-31-06-1477">9</xref>). In addition, we desired to ascertain how tamoxifen affects breast CSCs and whether or not these sorted cells display any resistance to hormonal therapy drugs. Therefore, we initially optimized and identified the effective dose and treatment time of tamoxifen. We then set out to study the effects of tamoxifen on isolated breast CSCs and compared the results with the MCF-7 parental cells. In contrast to doxorubicin, the tamoxifen experimentation results obtained by flow cytometric assays, western blot analysis and cell proliferation assay showed that both apoptotic and autophagic cell death ratios were similar in the CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells and MCF7 cells. Overall, our studies demonstrated that isolated CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> breast CSCs do not show significant resistance to tamoxifen which is the front-line therapy in most hormonal therapies for breast cancer patients. In conclusion, previous studies have demonstrated that CSCs show resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. This resistance is also thought to be the reason for the reoccurrence of tumor formation after chemotherapy or radiation therapy. In the present study, breast CSCs were isolated and studied to observe whether they were resistant to hormonal therapy. This study supported the results of previous studies showing that isolated breast CSCs from the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line show slight resistance to undergo apoptosis in response to doxorubicin. In the case of the hormonal therapy drug, tamoxifen, our studies demonstrated that tamoxifen-induced apoptotic and or autophagic cell death in these isolated cells were similar to that noted in MCF-7 cells and did not show a significant difference between the isolated breast CSCs and the parental cells.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gustafsson</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Novel aspects of estrogen action</article-title><source>J Soc Gynecol Investig</source><volume>7</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>S8</fpage><lpage>S9</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moggs</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Orphanides</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Estrogen receptors: orchestrators of pleiotropic cellular responses</article-title><source>EMBO Rep</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>775</fpage><lpage>781</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cos</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonz&#x000E1;lez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez-Campa</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Mediavilla</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso-Gonz&#x000E1;lez</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Barcel&#x000F3;</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Estrogen-signaling pathway: a link between breast cancer and melatonin oncostatic actions</article-title><source>Cancer Detect Prev</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>118</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fornari</surname><given-names>FA</given-names></name><name><surname>Randolph</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Yalowich</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ritke</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Gewirtz</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Interference by doxorubicin with DNA unwinding in MCF-7 breast tumor cells</article-title><source>Mol Pharmacol</source><volume>45</volume><fpage>649</fpage><lpage>656</lpage><year>1994</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akar</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaves-Reyez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Barria</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tari</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanguino</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Arun</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez-Berestein</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozpolat</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Silencing of Bcl-2 expression by small interfering RNA induces autophagic cell death in MCF-7 breast cancer cells</article-title><source>Autophagy</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>669</fpage><lpage>679</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deroo</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Korach</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Estrogen receptors and human disease</article-title><source>J Clin Invest</source><volume>116</volume><fpage>561</fpage><lpage>570</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>DiRenzo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor-regulated transcription</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>843</fpage><lpage>852</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bursch</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellinger</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kienzl</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>T&#x000F6;r&#x000F6;k</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Pandey</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sikorska</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermann</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Active cell death induced by the anti-estrogens tamoxifen and ICI 164 384 in human mammary carcinoma cells (MCF-7) in culture: the role of autophagy</article-title><source>Carcinogenesis</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>1595</fpage><lpage>1607</lpage><year>1996</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paglin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hollister</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Delohery</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hackett</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>McMahill</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sphicas</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Domingo</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yahalom</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A novel response of cancer cells to radiation involves autophagy and formation of acidic vesicles</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>439</fpage><lpage>444</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Charafe-Jauffret</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginestier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Birnbaum</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Breast cancer stem cells: tools and models to rely on</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>202</fpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomasek</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>McKeever</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>EY</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Expression of mutant p53 proteins implicates a lineage relationship between neural stem cells and malignant astrocytic glioma in a murine model</article-title><source>Cancer Cell</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>514</fpage><lpage>526</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santisteban</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiman</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Asiedu</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Behrens</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Nassar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalli</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Haluska</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingle</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartmann</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Manjili</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Radisky</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrone</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Knutson</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immune-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition in vivo generates breast cancer stem cells</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>2887</fpage><lpage>2895</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Charafe-Jauffret</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Monville</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginestier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Dontu</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Birnbaum</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wicha</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cancer stem cells in breast: current opinion and future challenges</article-title><source>Pathobiology</source><volume>75</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dean</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fojo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Bates</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Tumour stem cells and drug resistance</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuetz</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Bunting</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Colapietro</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sampath</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Morris</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lagutina</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Grosveld</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Osawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakauchi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorrentino</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype</article-title><source>Nat Med</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>1028</fpage><lpage>1034</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hait</surname><given-names>WN</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical management of recurrent breast cancer: development of multidrug resistance (MDR) and strategies to circumvent it</article-title><source>Semin Oncol</source><volume>32</volume><issue>Suppl 7</issue><fpage>S16</fpage><lpage>S21</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolman</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Heppner</surname><given-names>GH</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolman</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>New directions in breast cancer research</article-title><source>FASEB J</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>543</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ponti</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaffaroni</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Pratesi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrangolini</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Coradini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pilotti</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pierotti</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Daidone</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>5506</fpage><lpage>5511</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Hajj</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wicha</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Benito-Hernandez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Morrison</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Clarke</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>100</volume><fpage>3983</fpage><lpage>3988</lpage><year>2003</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yorimitsu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Klionsky</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Autophagy: molecular machinery for self-eating</article-title><source>Cell Death Differ</source><volume>12</volume><issue>Supp 2</issue><fpage>S1542</fpage><lpage>S1552</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shintani</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Klionsky</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Autophagy in health and disease: a double-edged sword</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>306</volume><fpage>990</fpage><lpage>995</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ravikumar</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreau</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jahreiss</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Puri</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubinsztein</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Plasma membrane contributes to the formation of pre-autophagosomal structures</article-title><source>Nat Cell Biol</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>747</fpage><lpage>757</lpage><year>2010</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abedin</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>McDonnell</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lehmann</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelekar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Autophagy delays apoptotic death in breast cancer cells following DNA damage</article-title><source>Cell Death Differ</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>510</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Codogno</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Meijer</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Autophagy and signaling: their role in cell survival and cell death</article-title><source>Cell Death Differ</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>1509</fpage><lpage>1518</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lum</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bauer</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindsten</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Growth factor regulation of autophagy and cell survival in the absence of apoptosis</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>237</fpage><lpage>248</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beau</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Mehrpour</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Codogno</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Autophagosomes and human diseases</article-title><source>Int J Biochem Cell Biol</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>460</fpage><lpage>464</lpage><year>2011</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Lysosomal function in macromolecular homeostasis and bioenergetics in Parkinson&#x02019;s disease</article-title><source>Mol Neurodegener</source><month>Apr</month><day>13</day><year>2010</year><comment>(Epub ahead of print)</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1750-1326-5-14</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weissman</surname><given-names>IL</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gage</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Stem and progenitor cells: origins, phenotypes, lineage commitments, and transdifferentiations</article-title><source>Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>387</fpage><lpage>403</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Calcagno</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Salcido</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambudkar</surname><given-names>SV</given-names></name><name><surname>Varticovski</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Brca1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;</sup> and CD133<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> cells with cancer stem cell characteristics</article-title><source>Breast Cancer Res</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>R10</fpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fillmore</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuperwasser</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Human breast cancer cell lines contain stem-like cells that self-renew, give rise to phenotypically diverse progeny and survive chemotherapy</article-title><source>Breast Cancer Res</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>R25</fpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Bae</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Noh</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation of CD24<sup>high</sup> and CD24<sup>low/&#x02212;</sup> cells from MCF-7: CD24 expression is positively related with proliferation, adhesion and invasion in MCF-7</article-title><source>Cancer Lett</source><volume>258</volume><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ijmm-31-06-1477"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gutierrez</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Hilsenbeck</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Pavlick</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Chamness</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><volume>100</volume><fpage>672</fpage><lpage>679</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Table</title>
<fig id="f1-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>) of (A) tamoxifen and (B) doxorubicin in MCF-7 cells as determined by the MTS assay. NT, non-treated.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g00.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g01.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>FACS histogram and quadrant data of CD44- and CD24-labeled MCF-7 cells (A) CD24-negative MCF-7 cells in P2 gate (B) CD44-positive and CD24-positive cells in P3 gate. (C) CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells in the Q4 quadrant.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g02.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g03.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g04.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of the growth rates of MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells at 96 h of incubation.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g05.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>MTS cell proliferation assay of MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells following treatment with (A) doxorubicin and (B) tamoxifen.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g06.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g07.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Flow cytometric results of the effects of doxorubicin and tamoxifen on the apoptosis and autophagy of MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells after 48 h of treatment. (A) Doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and (B) autophagy; (C) tamoxifen-induced apoptosis and (D) autophagy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g08.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g09.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g10.tif"/>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g11.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Western blot analysis for the LC3 protein demonstrating the autophagic effect of tamoxifen in MCF-7 and CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> (CD) cells at 48 h. Lane 1, non-treated cells (NT); lanes 2 and 3, cell lysates of MCF-7 cells treated with 8 and 10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen (T); lanes 4 and 5, cell lysates of CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> cells treated with 8 and 10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJMM-31-06-1477-g12.tif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-ijmm-31-06-1477" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative density of the LC3-II bands of the drug-treated cells compared to the untreated cells.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Samples</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Relative density</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">NT</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MCF-7 (8 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">2.70</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MCF-7 (10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">3.30</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> (8 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">2.80</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CD44<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/CD24<sup>&#x02212;/low</sup> (10 <italic>&#x003BC;</italic>M tamoxifen)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">3.19</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
