<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-0981</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1015</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm_00000045</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">etm-01-02-0293</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of the microvascular density in astrocytomas in adults correlated using SPECT-MIBI</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>CAVALCANTE</surname><given-names>SANDRO PANTOJA</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-etm-01-02-0293"/><xref rid="af1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref rid="af5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>WALTHER DE ALMEIDA</surname><given-names>JOS&#x000C9; REYNALDO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>CLARA</surname><given-names>CARLOS AFONSO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>NETO</surname><given-names>CRISTOVAM SCAPULATEMPO</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>PERES</surname><given-names>STELA VERZINHASE</given-names></name><xref rid="af4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MORIGUCHI</surname><given-names>S&#x000D4;NIA MARTA</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>DOS SANTOS</surname><given-names>MARCELO JOS&#x000C9;</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>ROCHA</surname><given-names>EUCLIDES TIM&#x000D3;TEO DA</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref rid="af5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>1</label>Neuro-oncology Division, Department of Surgery;</aff>
<aff id="af2-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>2</label>Departments of Pathology, and</aff>
<aff id="af3-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>3</label>Nuclear Medicine;</aff>
<aff id="af4-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>4</label>Research Support Group, Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII, 14784-400 Barretos;</aff>
<aff id="af5-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>5</label>Blood Transfusion Center, Medical School, S&#x000E3;o Paulo State University (UNESP), 18618-000 Botucatu, S&#x000E3;o Paulo, 
<country>Brazil</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-etm-01-02-0293">Correspondence to: Dr Sandro Pantoja Cavalcante, Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII, Avenida Antenor Duarte Vilela, 1331, Bairro Dr Paulo Prata, 14784-400 Barretos, S&#x000E3;o Paulo, Brazil E-mail: <email>sand_pc@hotmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<season>March-April</season>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>1</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>293</fpage>
<lpage>299</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2009</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2009</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2010, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Microvascular density (MVD) may be an additional prognostic marker for astrocytomas, but the heterogeneity of these tumors limits its use. Thus, imaging examinations such as SPECT-MIBI (2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile) may take on an indirect role in astrocytoma evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate MVD in astrocytomas using immunohistochemistry with anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies. The relationship between the immunohistochemical data and the parameters obtained from SPECT-MIBI was evaluated. This cross-sectional study evaluated 48 patients with brain tumors including low-grade astrocytomas (LGAs), anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs) and glioblastoma multiformes (GBMs). Patients had been admitted to the Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer de Barretos - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII, and underwent brain SPECTMIBI prior to any treatment. MVD was determined under an optical microscope by counting microvessels on slides from each case. SPECT-MIBI images were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively. GBMs, AAs and LGAs represented 50, 16.7 and 33.3&#x00025; of the total sample, respectively. There were 13 normal and 35 abnormal SPECT-MIBI images. Significant differences in MVD were found between AA and LGA cases (p&#x0003D;0.040), but not between normal and abnormal SPECT-MIBI. The mean counts from SPECT-MIBI were not correlated with MVD. Among the GBM cases, there were no significant findings, except for an increased likelihood of abnormal histological test results. MVD was related to histological grade (in AA and LGA cases) but was not correlated with SPECT-MIBI.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>microvascular density</kwd>
<kwd>SPECT-MIBI</kwd>
<kwd>astrocytomas</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Among the tumors that affect the brain, gliomas of astrocytic, oligodendroglial and ependymal origin are responsible for more than 70&#x00025; of tumor occurrences (<xref rid="b1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). Of these, astrocytomas are the most frequent histological type. They are classified according to their malignant potential and graded on the basis of histological criteria recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) (<xref rid="b2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Over the last few years, knowledge of the mechanisms of tumor progression leading to astrocytomas has increased. This has led to the supplementation of histological grade with new potential prognostic markers. Among these, there has been increasing interest concerning the role of the quantification of vessels in astrocytomas, with ongoing investigations being conducted (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>).</p>
<p>In 1991, Weidner <italic>et al</italic> were the first to report on the prognostic value of measurements of angiogenesis using a model of primary breast tumors (<xref rid="b4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). Many investigators have supported the notion of an inverse correlation between microvascular density (MVD) and prognosis (<xref rid="b5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>), while others have refuted this (<xref rid="b8-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). MVD has also been shown to be a prognostic indicator of postoperative survival among patients with astrocytomas (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). However, the quantification of the vascularization of brain tumors has been limited due to the cell heterogeneity found in these tumors (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Other authors have demonstrated significant differences in MVD between tumors in children and adults (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>).</p>
<p>For brain tumors, MIBI (2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile) has been shown to be accurate in identifying recurrence following treatment for high-grade gliomas, thereby making it possible to differentiate them from radionecrosis (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>), although there are divergent opinions on this subject (<xref rid="b12-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). Furthermore, MIBI aids in differentiating between the findings from neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b13-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>), allows tumor grade to be evaluated (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>), and assists in predicting therapeutic response (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b14-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). The intensity of uptake is related not only to breaking the blood-brain barrier, but also to tumor metabolic activity (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b16-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Thus, MIBI may be used to evaluate the biological characteristics of brain tumors and helps to determine their proliferative potential and prognosis (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b18-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>,<xref rid="b19-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). Because of its molecular characteristics, MIBI is preferentially absent in mitochondria (<xref rid="b20-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b21-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). Since the mitochondrial activity in tumors is usually high, this generates an increase in the transmembrane gradient, which favors its accumulation in tumor tissue significantly.</p>
<p>Vascularization is important as a prognostic factor in many types of neoplasias (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b22-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>,<xref rid="b23-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>), but such evaluations are only possible today through direct analysis of slides using several methods (<xref rid="b4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b22-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>) that all have limitations due to the heterogeneity of these tumors (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Various imaging techniques have been proposed as valuable tools for evaluating vascularization in brain tumors, among them SPECT-MIBI (<xref rid="b16-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). This method has revealed a significant correlation between MIBI uptake rates and length of survival, according to the aggressiveness of the recurrent malignant gliomas (<xref rid="b24-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>). However, the amount of robust information on its relationship with MVD remains insufficient, thus allowing for new perspectives regarding this approach.</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to evaluate MVD in low-grade astrocytomas (LGAs), anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs) and multiform glioblastomas (GBMs) using immunohistochemistry with anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies to determine the relationship between immunohistochemical data and the parameters obtained from SPECT-MIBI.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Study population and protocol</title>
<p>A study of cross-sectional type was conducted, within which demographic and KPS (Karnofsky performance scale) data were gathered retrospectively from 48 patients (29 men and 19 women; mean age 48.8 years, SD 15.9, range 20&#x02013;73 years) who had been admitted to the Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer de Barretos - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII. None of these patients had undergone any previous surgical or therapeutic procedures. Only cases of supratentorial gliomas that had been diagnosed in accordance with WHO criteria (<xref rid="b2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>) as LGAs (of which only diffuse astrocytomas were selected), AAs or GBMs were included. All patients underwent brain SPECT with MIBI before any procedures. Tumor tissue specimens of an adequate quantity were available in paraffin blocks for all patients. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Acquisition of brain SPECT images with MIBI</title>
<p>Examinations were performed 15 min after intravenous administration of 720 MBq of MIBI labeled with Tc99m. Tomographic images were captured using a GE Millenium VG gamma camera equipped with two high resolution detectors, with a 128x128 matrix and 360&#x000B0; rotation, thus making it possible to obtain 120 two-dimensional frames of the brain, 25 sec/frame. The images obtained were reconstructed in a 128x128 matrix using Butterworth-filtered back-projection, with a cutoff of 0.25 and order of five (<xref rid="b25-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>), in accordance with a semi-automated protocol furnished by the manufacturer. The examinations were interpreted by an experienced nuclear medicine physician in the Department of Nuclear Medicine of Hospital de C&#x000E2;ncer - Funda&#x000E7;&#x000E3;o Pio XII.</p>
<p>Interpretations were initially performed by visual analysis and classified as normal or abnormal. The latter were then subdivided into abnormal images of mild intensity (when uptake could be discerned, but less than in the scalp), moderate intensity (when the uptake was as intense as the scalp) and marked intensity (when the uptake was equivalent to the salivary glands). Semiquantitative analysis was performed to investigate the mean count in the tumor area and in a mirror area in the contralateral hemisphere (<xref rid="b14-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b16-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b24-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>,<xref rid="b26-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). This made it possible to obtain an index (tumor/contralateral side index, T/CL) as the ratio between these measurements.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Histopathological classification</title>
<p>Slides stained with H&#x00026;E were produced from the paraffin blocks in order to review the diagnoses and the histopathological grade. These reviews were performed by two experienced pathologists following WHO criteria (<xref rid="b2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Immunohistochemical reactions</title>
<p>Sections (3 &#x003BC;m) were cut from the paraffin blocks from each case. These were mounted on slides and silanized (3-aminopropyltriethoxilane, A-3648, Sigma, USA) and deparaffinized in a heated chamber at 60&#x000B0;C for 12 h for immunohistochemical reactions.</p>
<p>The streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique was used with anti-CD34 class II monoclonal antibodies (clone QBEnd-10, code m7165, titration 1:800; Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Antigen recovery was carried out on a Pascal pan, using citrate at pH 6.0. Amplification was performed using the Advance&#x02122; HRP System (Dako Cytomation).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Microscopic analysis of immunohistochemical reactions</title>
<p>MVD was analyzed as described by Weidner <italic>et al</italic>, with some modifications (<xref rid="b4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). Two observers without knowledge of the case diagnoses viewed the slides under a dual-view optical microscope (Olympus BX 41) at a magnification of x40, searching for the areas of greatest concentration of immunolabeled vessels (hot spots). At each hot spot, a magnification of x200 was used to photograph the optical field. A total of three fields were photographed, one in each hot spot of each tumor. Adobe<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> Photoshop 7.0 software was used to open and amplify the images. The vessels were counted on the computer screen. Individual microvessels (arterioles and venules) were counted in each of these areas, and the MVD was determined as the ratio of the total number of microvessels counted divided by the three fields examined (<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>).</p>
<p>Any CD34-positive endothelial cells or groupings of endothelial cells (clusters) that were clearly separated from the tumor cells and other glial elements were considered to be a single countable microvessel. Those that appeared to be derived from the same vessel, if separate, were also counted. Each fixed lumen was counted as a single countable microvessel. If there was no lumen, but only a single CD34-positive cell visible, this cell was also interpreted as a single microvessel (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>A descriptive analysis was performed on the data in terms of frequencies and percentages, central trend and dispersion measurements, means, medians, standard deviations, minimums and maximums. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to investigate the adherence of the quantitative variables to a normal distribution curve. For the dependent variable of MVD, this test was applied in accordance with the subdivisions of each demographic, clinical and interventional category (<xref rid="b27-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). For associations between qualitative variables relating to anatomopathology and visual analysis, the Fisher&#x02019;s exact test was applied.</p>
<p>Since some variables did not present a normal distribution, it was decided to use non-parametric tests. To compare the means between the independent variables and MVD, the Mann-Whitney test was applied when the independent variable had two categories, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used when the independent variable had more than two categories. To investigate correlations between the dependent variable (MVD) and the tumor/contralateral side (T/CL) index, Spearman&#x02019;s correlation was used. Statistical significance was set as p&#x0003C;0.05. Data input, consistency and analysis were performed using SPSS software for Windows, version 16.0.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>As shown in <xref rid="t1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>, the single forms of clinical presentation most commonly found were headache (37.5&#x00025;), motor deficit (25&#x00025;) and convulsions (14.6&#x00025;). Most of these patients (81.3&#x00025;) presented KPS of &#x02265;70&#x00025;. Among the paraffin-block specimens, 75&#x00025; were obtained from surgical procedures with full or partial macroscopic resection of the tumor, and the remainder came from biopsies. GBMs accounted for 24 cases (50&#x00025;) of the sample, while the LGA and AA groups represented 16 (33.3&#x00025;) and 8 cases (16.7&#x00025;), respectively. Visual analysis of the SPECT-MIBI examinations did not find any abnormality in 13 examinations (27.1&#x00025;), while the remaining 35 examinations (72.9&#x00025;) presented mild, moderate or marked abnormalities.</p>
<p>Among these 35 abnormal examinations, the mean count in the tumor was 1226.1, and in the mirror image it was 285.2. The mean T/CL index was 5.8. The mean number of vessels found in the 48 slides was 71 vessels/field as shown in <xref rid="t2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>.</p>
<p>In analyzing the differences in mean MVD in relation to gender and the interventions that gave rise to the specimens, there was no significance except in relation to the anatomopathological variable (p&#x0003D;0.013). However, the MVD for the GBMs was lower, with a mean of 58.8 vessels/field, while for the AA and LGA cases it was 107.4 and 71.4 vessels/field, respectively, as indicated in <xref rid="t3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>.</p>
<p>The difference in mean MVD between the AAs and LGAs was significant (p&#x0003D;0.040). However, there was no significant difference in mean MVD between normal and abnormal examinations (p&#x0003D;0.057), as shown in <xref rid="t4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table IV</xref>. A similar analysis for the GBM group did not reach significance (p&#x0003D;0.295) (result not shown in the Table). Correlation between the T/CL index and MVD was also non-significant, as shown in <xref rid="t5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table V</xref>.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <xref rid="t6-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table VI</xref> indicates that there was a greater likelihood that the GBM group would present abnormal examination results in relation to the AA and LGA cases (87.5 vs. 58.3&#x00025;; p&#x0003D;0.049).</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, data on 48 adult patients with supratentorial astrocytomas were evaluated in an attempt to establish a relationship between MVD in these tumors and the results of analysis using SPECT-MIBI. Gender did not influence MVD, which has not been previously discussed in the literature. GBMs accounted for 50&#x00025; of the sample evaluated as shown in <xref rid="t1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>, although there was no randomization. Despite the lower diagnostic accuracy provided by biopsies (<xref rid="b28-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>), which suggests that studies with such samples should be regarded separately (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>), in our study there was no significant difference in mean MVD between the samples obtained through biopsy and those obtained through surgery, as shown in <xref rid="t3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>.</p>
<p>There have been discussions on the relationship between MVD and tumor prognosis, not only outside the central nervous system (<xref rid="b5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b23-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>), but also within (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). Moreover, the presence of vascular proliferation determined non-quantitatively distinguishes high- and low-grade astrocytomas (<xref rid="b2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). For this reason, it would be expected that a greater MVD would be obtained with increasing tumor grade. Such a relationship was found between the LGAs and AAs, but not for the GBMs, as indicated in <xref rid="t3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>. In 2005, Yao <italic>et al</italic> found a significant difference only between GBMs and LGAs (<xref rid="b10-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>), while Leon <italic>et al,</italic> considering only AA and GBM cases in 1996, showed that there was a significant association between microvascular grade and histology (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Furthermore, the latter author showed that microvascular grade and MVD were significant predictors of postoperative survival, and that the vascular grade was more intense, which was explained by the existence of glomeruloid vascular structures. In fact, these structures are clusters of vessels that influence the choice of hotspots, given that the microvascular grade is higher in these areas. Nonetheless, they are counted as single vessels at a higher magnification, thereby probably resulting in an underestimation of the count of individual microvessels (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Extensive areas of necrosis also confer additional explanations, although, in the present study, there was constant attention to avoiding areas that were close to necrosis. The existence of necrosis makes immunohistochemical analyses difficult (<xref rid="b29-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>), while MVD has failed to show any correlation with histological grade in tumors presenting necrosis (<xref rid="b30-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). Tumor necrosis, and in particular large-scale ischemic necrosis, is significantly more frequent in primary GBMs (<xref rid="b31-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>,<xref rid="b32-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). Therefore, the presence of glomeruloid formations and necrosis, which were elements observed in the present study, may explain why there was an underestimation of the microvessel counts in the GBMs. It was understood that the identification of hot spots, from the manner in which this was carried out, might not faithfully represent the appropriate area for counting the vessels inside the tumor. This would particularly be the case in GBMs, in which the heterogeneous characteristic of brain tumors appeared to be more evident.</p>
<p>This heterogeneity has limited the use of pathological analysis techniques (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>), thus explaining why no relationship between tumor grade and MVD was found by some authors (<xref rid="b33-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). Moreover, different methods have been used to quantify MVD (<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="b34-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>), which leads to a lack of standardization and additional difficulties in establishing the real role of vessel quantification as a prognostic indicator.</p>
<p>It is known that 95&#x00025; of GBMs start out as GBMs, while only 5&#x00025; originate from LGAs or AAs. Thus, GBMs may be primary or secondary. These constitute distinct entities that affect patients at different ages and develop through different genetic routes. LGA and AA represent a continuum within the disease, with similar genetic characteristics, and thus differ from GBM, which has separate genetic characteristics (<xref rid="b35-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>,<xref rid="b36-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). In the present study, out of the 48 specimens evaluated, there were 24 GBMs, which were studied separately. It is important to note that, due to the presence of extensive areas of necrosis, it was not possible to establish a correlation between MVD and the GBMs.</p>
<p>Anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies were chosen for the present study. Although they are non-specific for endothelial cells, they present good sensitivity for vascular endothelium (<xref rid="b37-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>) and are an efficient vascular marker for glial tumors (<xref rid="b33-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). Several other markers have been described, but none have been indicated as the most recommended or most efficient. Comparative studies on different antibodies have shown divergent results, particularly with regard to prognosis (<xref rid="b7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b23-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>,<xref rid="b33-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). The main criticism that could be directed towards anti-CD34 is that it not only marks the neoformed vessels, but also the normal vessels existing inside the tumor (<xref rid="b5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that not all neoformed vessels have evident circulation (<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). It should be emphasized that this peculiar characteristic of anti-CD34 was regarded as a point of interest by the present authors, since they judged that the SPECT-MIBI images would be dependent on the vascular supply of the tumor.</p>
<p>The mechanisms for MIBI uptake are still not well defined, although some authors have reported that MIBI uptake does not depend on MVD and only reflects the rupturing of the blood-brain barrier (<xref rid="b16-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Nonetheless, the existence of methodological inconsistencies in quantifying MVD means that its true value in relation to MIBI uptake cannot be assessed with certainty. MIBI has been widely used to differentiate radionecrosis from tumor recurrence (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>), but there were three cases of GBM in the present study in which no abnormal areas of uptake were viewed (<xref rid="t6-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table VI</xref>). A similar finding was described previously (<xref rid="b12-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>), which indicates the need for caution in interpreting these examinations.</p>
<p>There was a significant difference in mean MVD between LGA and AA cases, but a significant difference (p&#x0003D;0.057) was not noted between uptake and MVD (<xref rid="t4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table IV</xref>). However, we believe that the sample size may have influenced this result, and that evaluation of a larger sample would lead to the finding of significance in this tumor group. In 2004, Staudenherz <italic>et al</italic> stated that MVD is not crucial for the scintigraphic viewing of brain tumors using 99mTc-MIBI (<xref rid="b17-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). In their sample, there were four cases, of which three were astrocytomas and one was an oligodendroglioma. There were no associations between histological grade and MVD, and only a descriptive analysis was made.</p>
<p>The T/CL indices obtained in the present study did not present any significant correlation and, in addition, the index was negative for the GBMs (<xref rid="t5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table V</xref> and <xref rid="f1-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). In addition, there was no significant difference between the means of the examinations with normal and abnormal uptake among the GBM cases. There have been many studies on MVD or SPECT-MIBI in brain tumors (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b12-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b14-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b16-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>-<xref rid="b19-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b24-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>-<xref rid="b26-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>,<xref rid="b33-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>,<xref rid="b34-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>,<xref rid="b38-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>), but this is the first that sought to establish a relationship between MVD and a numerical indicator obtained from semi-quantitative analysis on SPECT-MIBI images.</p>
<p>We observed that there was a greater likelihood that GBM cases would present abnormal SPECT-MIBI results in relation to tumors of lower grade (<xref rid="t6-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table">Table VI</xref>). Histologically, GBMs are characterized by intense vascular proliferation (<xref rid="b2-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>), but no association with such data could be confirmed by current immunohistochemical methods due to the limitations cited above.</p>
<p>The results reported in this study must be interpreted with caution due to a number of methodological shortcomings that could limit the internal validity of our study, such as GBM extensive necrosis, MVD quantification and the small number of specimens analyzed. Therefore, it was not possible to fully ascertain whether the use of the SPECT-MIBI approach may serve as an adjunctive resource to the clinical armamentarium.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the results from the present study indicate that the use of MVD, determined immunohistochemically, had a significant relationship with histological grade in the LGAs and AAs, but not in relation to the GBMs. On the other hand, the association between SPECT-MIBI and the MVD of the LGA and AA cases was not significant, nor was the association between SPECT-MIBI and the MVD of the GBM cases.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Special thanks to Dr Edmundo Carvalho Mauad for the encouragement and dedication to academic training.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-etm-01-02-0293"><label>1.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kleihues</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Louis</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Scheithauer</surname><given-names>BW</given-names></name><name><surname>Rorke</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Reifenberger</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Burger</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavanee</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system</article-title><source>J Neuropathol Exp Neurol</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-etm-01-02-0293"><label>2.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Lois</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohgaki</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiestler</surname><given-names>OD</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavanee</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name></person-group><source>WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System</source><publisher-name>IARC</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Lyon</publisher-loc><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-etm-01-02-0293"><label>3.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birlik</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Canda</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozer</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Tumour vascularity is of prognostic significance in adult, but not paediatric astrocytomas</article-title><source>Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>532</fpage><lpage>538</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-etm-01-02-0293"><label>4.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weidner</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Semple</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Welch</surname><given-names>WR</given-names></name><name><surname>Folkman</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis &#x02013; correlation in invasive breast carcinoma</article-title><source>N Eng J Med</source><volume>324</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-etm-01-02-0293"><label>5.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Otake</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yanagihara</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: Comparison between anti-CD34 antibody and anti-CD105 antibody</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>3410</fpage><lpage>3415</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-etm-01-02-0293"><label>6.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Offersen</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeiffer</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamilton-Dutoit</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Overgaad</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Patterns of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung carcinoma</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>91</volume><fpage>1500</fpage><lpage>1509</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-etm-01-02-0293"><label>7.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Comparative evaluation of microvessel density determined by CD34 or CD105 in benign and malignant gastric lesions</article-title><source>Hum Pathol</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>861</fpage><lpage>866</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-etm-01-02-0293"><label>8.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Giovanini</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamassaki</surname><given-names>HO</given-names></name><name><surname>De Carvalho</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Rapoport</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Densidade microvascular no carcinoma de l&#x000ED;ngua</article-title><source>Rev Assoc Med Bras</source><volume>48</volume><fpage>204</fpage><lpage>208</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-etm-01-02-0293"><label>9.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leon</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Folkerth</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Black</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microvessel density is a prognostic indicator for patients with astroglial brain tumors</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>77</volume><fpage>362</fpage><lpage>372</lpage><year>1996</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-etm-01-02-0293"><label>10.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeuchi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic significance of microvessel density determined by an anti-CD105/endoglin monoclonal antibody in astrocytic tumors: comparison with an anti-CD31 monoclonal antibody</article-title><source>Neuropathology</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>206</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-etm-01-02-0293"><label>11.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baldari</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pecorella</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Cosentino</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Minutoli</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Investigation of brain tumours with 99mTc-MIBI SPECT</article-title><source>Q J Nucl Med</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>336</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-etm-01-02-0293"><label>12.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goethals</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>De Winter</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Dierckk</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Annovazzi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Signore</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>van de Wiele</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>False-negative Tc-99m scintigraphy in histopathologically proved recurrent high-grade oligodendroglioma</article-title><source>Clin Nucl Med</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>299</fpage><lpage>301</lpage><year>2003</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-etm-01-02-0293"><label>13.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Minutoli</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Angileri</surname><given-names>FF</given-names></name><name><surname>Conti</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Timing of examination affects reliability of 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile SPECT in distinguishing neoplastic from nonneoplastic brain hematomas</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>574</fpage><lpage>579</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-etm-01-02-0293"><label>14.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Curtis</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Technetium-MIBI as a glioma imaging agent for the assessment of multidrug resistance</article-title><source>Neurosurgery</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>1323</fpage><lpage>1332</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-etm-01-02-0293"><label>15.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasajima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimada</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Naitoh</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Satohh</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizoi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>99mTc-MIBI imaging for prediction of therapeutic effects of second-generation MDR1 inhibitors in malignant brain tumors</article-title><source>Int J Cancer</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>2637</fpage><lpage>2645</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-etm-01-02-0293"><label>16.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Staudenherz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fazeny</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Marosi</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Does 99mTc-sestamibi in high-grade malignant brain tumors reflect blood-brain barrier damage only?</article-title><source>Neuroimage</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>111</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-etm-01-02-0293"><label>17.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Staudenherz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolfsberg</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Killer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Microvessel density is not crucial for scintigraphic visualization of brain tumors using 99mTc-MIBI</article-title><source>Microvasc Res</source><volume>67</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>222</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-etm-01-02-0293"><label>18.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagamachi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jinnouchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nabeshima</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The correlation between 99mTc-MIBI uptake and MIB-1 as a nuclear proliferation marker in glioma &#x02013; a comparative study with 201TL</article-title><source>Neuroradiology</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>1023</fpage><lpage>1030</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-etm-01-02-0293"><label>19.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ak</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulbas</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Altinel</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Vardareli</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>TC-99m MIBI uptake and its relation to the proliferative potential of brain tumors</article-title><source>Clin Nucl Med</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>33</lpage><year>2003</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-etm-01-02-0293"><label>20.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiu</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Kronauge</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawamura</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Holman</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Piwnica-Worms</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Subcellular distribution and analysis of technetium-99-MIBI in isolated perfused rat hearts</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>1516</fpage><lpage>1522</lpage><year>1992</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-etm-01-02-0293"><label>21.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piwinca-Worms</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Kronauge</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiu</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Enhancement by tetraphenylborate of technetium-99m-MIBI uptake kinetics and accumulation in cultured chick myocardial cells</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1992</fpage><lpage>1999</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-etm-01-02-0293"><label>22.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Offersen</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorensen</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Yilmaz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Knoop</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Overgaard</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Chalkley estimates of angiogenesis in early breast cancer</article-title><source>Acta Oncol</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>703</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-etm-01-02-0293"><label>23.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mineo</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambrogi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Baldi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rabitti</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bollero</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vicenzi</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Tonini</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic impact of VEGF, CD31, CD34 and CD105 expression and tumor vessel invasion after radical surgery for IB-IIA non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>J Clin Pathol</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>591</fpage><lpage>597</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-etm-01-02-0293"><label>24.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beauchesne</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Soler</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Correlation of 99m Tc-MIBI brain spect (Functional index ratios) and survival after treatment failure in malignant glioma patients</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>3081</fpage><lpage>3085</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-etm-01-02-0293"><label>25.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soler</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Beauchesne</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Maatougui</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Technetium-99msestamibi brain single-photon emission tomography for detection of recurrent gliomas after radiation therapy</article-title><source>Eur J Nucl Med</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>1649</fpage><lpage>1657</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-etm-01-02-0293"><label>26.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>San Pedro</surname><given-names>EC</given-names></name><name><surname>Yilmaz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>HG</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenfeld</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Mountz</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A new semiquantitative method for comparing brain tumor uptake of Tc-99m sestamibi and TL-201</article-title><source>Clin Nucl Med</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>868</fpage><lpage>873</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-etm-01-02-0293"><label>27.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Field</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><source>Discovering Statistic Using SPSS</source><edition>2nd edition</edition><publisher-name>SAGE</publisher-name><publisher-loc>California</publisher-loc><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-etm-01-02-0293"><label>28.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glantz</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Burger</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Herdon</surname><given-names>JE</given-names><suffix>II</suffix></name><name><surname>Friedman</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name><name><surname>Caircross</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Vick</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Shold</surname><given-names>SC</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of the type of surgery on the histologic diagnosis in patients with anaplastic gliomas</article-title><source>Neurology</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>1741</fpage><lpage>1744</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-etm-01-02-0293"><label>29.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aronsson</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name><name><surname>Muhr</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Quantification of sensitivity of endothelial cell markers for the astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma tumors</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>346</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-etm-01-02-0293"><label>30.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shivakumar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Prabhakar</surname><given-names>BT</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayashree</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajan</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Salimath</surname><given-names>BP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) as prognostic indicators in carcinoma breast</article-title><source>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</source><volume>135</volume><fpage>627</fpage><lpage>636</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-etm-01-02-0293"><label>31.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tohama</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Gratas</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>van Meir</surname><given-names>EG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Necrogenesis and Fas/APO-1 (CD95) expression in primary (de novo) and secondary glioblastomas</article-title><source>J Neuropathol Exp Neurol</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-etm-01-02-0293"><label>32.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Homma</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukushima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Vaccarella</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Correlation among pathology, genotype and patient outcomes in glioblastoma</article-title><source>J Neuropathol Exp Neurol</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>846</fpage><lpage>854</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-etm-01-02-0293"><label>33.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Netto</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bleil</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Hilbig</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Coutinho</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immunohistochemical evaluation of the microvascular density through the expression of TGF-&#x003B2; (CD 105/endoglin) and CD 34 receptors and expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in oligodendrogliomas</article-title><source>Neuropathology</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-etm-01-02-0293"><label>34.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vaquero</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zurita</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Coca</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Oya</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Morales</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic significance of clinical and angiogenesis-related factors in low-grade oligodendrogliomas</article-title><source>Surg Neurol</source><volume>54</volume><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>234</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-etm-01-02-0293"><label>35.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohgaki</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleihues</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates and genetic alterations in astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas</article-title><source>J Neuropathol Exp Neurol</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>479</fpage><lpage>489</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-etm-01-02-0293"><label>36.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohgaki</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kleihues</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma</article-title><source>Am J Pathol</source><volume>170</volume><fpage>1445</fpage><lpage>1453</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-etm-01-02-0293"><label>37.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Folkerth</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Descriptive analysis and quantification of angiogenesis in human brain tumors</article-title><source>J Neurooncol</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>165</fpage><lpage>172</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-etm-01-02-0293"><label>38.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Traweek</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><name><surname>Kandalaft</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Metha</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Battifora</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen (CD34) in vascular neoplasia</article-title><source>Am J Clin Pathol</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figure and Tables</title>
<fig id="f1-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Glioblastoma multiforme with few vessels and marked uptake.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ETM-01-02-0293-g00.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption>
<p>Description of the clinical, surgical and anatomopathological data and visual analysis of the SPECT-MIBI results.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">n</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00025;</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Symptoms or signs of presentation</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Headache</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">37.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Convulsions</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">14.6</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Motor deficit</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">25.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Associated and other symptoms</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">21.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Unknown</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">2.1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">KPS (&#x00025;)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;&#x02264;40</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">2.1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;50&#x02013;60</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">16.7</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;70&#x02013;80</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">39.6</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;90&#x02013;100</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">18.8</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Unknown</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">22.9</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Intervention</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Biopsy</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">25.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Surgery</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">75.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Anatomopathology</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Glioblastoma multiforme</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">50.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Anaplastic astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">16.7</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Low-grade astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">33.3</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Visual analysis</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Normal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">27.1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Mildly abnormal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">20.8</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Moderately abnormal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">37.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Markedly abnormal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">14.6</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">100.0</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-etm-01-02-0293">
<p>KPS, Karnofsky performance scale.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t2-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption>
<p>Description of the mean count parameters and MVD.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of examinations</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean (SD)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Median</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MCT</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1226.1 (1132.3)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">817.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MCMI</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">285.2 (291.1)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">185.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T/CL index</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.8 (5.4)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3.9</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">MVD</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">71.1 (33.9)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">64.9</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn2-etm-01-02-0293">
<p>MCT, mean count in the tumor; MCMI, mean count in the mirror image; T/CL, ratio of mean counts in the tumor and on the contralateral side; MVD, microvascular density.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t3-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption>
<p>Difference in the mean MVD between the categories.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No.</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean (SD)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Median</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">p-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Male</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">29</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">70.7 (33.9)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">71.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.983<xref rid="tfn3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Female</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">71.8 (34.9)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">63.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Intervention</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Biopsy</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">12</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">69.4 (41.1)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">51.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.668<xref rid="tfn3-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Surgery</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">71.7 (31.7)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">68.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Anatomopathology</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Glioblastoma multiforme</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">58.8 (20.0)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">55.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.013<xref rid="tfn4-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>b</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Anaplastic astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">107.4 (42.4)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">114.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Low-grade astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">71.4 (34.8)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">76.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn3-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>a</label>
<p>Mann-Whitney test;</p></fn><fn id="tfn4-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>b</label>
<p>Kruskal-Wallis test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t4-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table IV.</label>
<caption>
<p>Difference in the mean MVD between anaplastic astrocytomas and low-grade astrocytomas, and between examinations with normal and abnormal uptake.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of examinations</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Mean (SD)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">p-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Anatomopathology</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Anaplastic astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">8</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">107.4 (42.40)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.040<xref rid="tfn5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Low-grade astrocytoma</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">71.4 (34.82)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Uptake</td>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="right" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Normal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">10</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">64.9 (34.84)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.057<xref rid="tfn5-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;&#x02003;Abnormal</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">96.6 (40.13)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn5-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>a</label>
<p>Mann-Whitney test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t5-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table V.</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations of quantitative variables with MVD.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No.</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">r-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">p-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T/CL index in LGA and AA</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.238</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.413<xref rid="tfn7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T/CL index in GBM</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x02212;0.084</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.716<xref rid="tfn7-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn6-etm-01-02-0293">
<p>T/CL, ratio of mean counts in the tumor and on the contralateral side; LGA, low-grade astrocytoma; AA, anaplastic astrocytoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme.</p></fn><fn id="tfn7-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>a</label>
<p>Spearman test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t6-etm-01-02-0293" position="float">
<label>Table VI.</label>
<caption>
<p>Likelihood of abnormal examination result in relation to histological type.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Visual analysis</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center" valign="top">Anatomopathology
<hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top"/>
<th align="center" valign="top">LGA/AA</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GBM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top"/>
<th colspan="2" align="left" valign="top">
<hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top"/>
<th align="center" valign="top">No. (&#x00025;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">No. (&#x00025;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">p-value<xref rid="tfn9-etm-01-02-0293" ref-type="table-fn"><sup>a</sup></xref></th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Normal</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10 (41.7)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3 (12.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.049</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Abnormal</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14 (58.3)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">21 (87.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24 (100.0)</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">24 (100.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"/></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn8-etm-01-02-0293">
<p>LGA, low-grade astrocytoma; AA, anaplastic astrocytoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme.</p></fn><fn id="tfn9-etm-01-02-0293">
<label>a</label>
<p>Fisher&#x02019;s exact test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
