<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-0981</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1015</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2010.126</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">etm-01-05-0829</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings for the prediction of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HIRAOKA</surname><given-names>ATSUSHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-etm-01-05-0829"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>OCHI</surname><given-names>HIRONORI</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HIDAKA</surname><given-names>SATOSHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>UEHARA</surname><given-names>TAKAHIDE</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HASEBE</surname><given-names>AKI</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>TANIHIRA</surname><given-names>TETSUYA</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MIYAMOTO</surname><given-names>YASUNAO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>NINOMIYA</surname><given-names>TOMOYUKI</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>KAWASAKI</surname><given-names>HIDEKI</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>SOGABE</surname><given-names>ICHIRO</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>ISHIMARU</surname><given-names>YOSHIHIRO</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MIYAGAWA</surname><given-names>MASAO</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>FURUYA</surname><given-names>KEIZO</given-names></name><xref rid="af4-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HIROOKA</surname><given-names>MASASHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>ABE</surname><given-names>MASANORI</given-names></name><xref rid="af5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HIASA</surname><given-names>YOICHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MATSUURA</surname><given-names>BUNZO</given-names></name><xref rid="af5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>ONJI</surname><given-names>MORIKAZU</given-names></name><xref rid="af5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MICHITAKA</surname><given-names>KOJIRO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-etm-01-05-0829">
<label>1</label>Gastroenterology Center;</aff>
<aff id="af2-etm-01-05-0829">
<label>2</label>Departments of Surgery,</aff>
<aff id="af3-etm-01-05-0829">
<label>3</label>Radiology, and</aff>
<aff id="af4-etm-01-05-0829">
<label>4</label>Pathology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital;</aff>
<aff id="af5-etm-01-05-0829">
<label>5</label>Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, 
<country>Japan</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-etm-01-05-0829">Correspondence to: Atsushi Hiraoka, Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasuga-Cho 83, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-0024, Japan, E-mail: <email>hirage@m.ehime-u.ac.jp</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<season>September-October</season>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>7</month>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>829</fpage>
<lpage>832</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2010</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>6</month>
<year>2010</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2010, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>We investigated the predictive value of fluorine-18-fluorodenoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pathological malignant potential and early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection. From April 2006 to October 2009, 53 patients with na&#x000EF;ve HCC were enrolled. Accumulations of 2-&#x0005B;18F&#x0005D;-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in both HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver as well as the ratio of SUVmax (R-SUV; HCC/liver) were calculated. The results were evaluated to determine prognostic factors for early recurrence. One patient was graded as tumor node metastasis stage I, 35 as II, 14 as III and 3 as stage IV. Elevated protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (&#x02265;200 mAU/ml) as well as elevated fucosylated &#x003B1;-fetoprotein (&#x02265;15&#x00025;), tumor size (&#x02265;5 cm) and high R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5) were risk factors for early recurrence in a univariate analysis (P&#x0003C;0.05). In a multivariate analysis, high R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5) was the only risk factor (P&#x0003C;0.05). The recurrence-free rate in patients with low R-SUV (&#x0003C;1.5, n&#x0003D;34) was higher than that in those with high R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5, n&#x0003D;19) (1- and 2-year rates: 100 and 67&#x00025;, 67 and 17&#x00025;; respectively, P&#x0003C;0.01). Patients with Edmondson III showed higher R-SUV values than those with Edmondson I and II (3.0&#x000B1;1.8, 1.4&#x000B1;0.3 and 1.9&#x000B1;0.9, respectively, P&#x0003C;0.01), while those with microvascular invasion (vp)(&#x0002B;), micro-intrahepatic metastasis (im) (&#x0002B;) or non-boundary type showed higher R-SUV values than vp(&#x02212;), im(&#x02212;) and boundary type (3.6&#x000B1;2.4 vs. 2.0&#x000B1;0.9, 3.5&#x000B1;2.3 vs. 1.9&#x000B1;0.8 and 2.9&#x000B1;1.8 vs. 1.6&#x000B1;0.5, respectively, P&#x0003C;0.01). R-SUV is proposed to be a useful marker for the prediction of early recurrence of HCC after resection.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>2-&#x0005B;18F&#x0005D;-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose</kwd>
<kwd>positron emission tomography</kwd>
<kwd>computed tomography</kwd>
<kwd>hepatocellular carcinoma</kwd>
<kwd>prognosis</kwd>
<kwd>hepatic resection</kwd>
<kwd>recurrence</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Recently, 2-&#x0005B;18F&#x0005D;-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has been used for diagnosing malignant tumors, and many reports have described its role for predicting the malignant potential of these tumors. However, the clinical efficacy of PET/CT for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, and only a few reports have described the predictive value of its findings for pathological malignant potential and prognosis (<xref rid="b1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>).</p>
<p>Hepatic resection is performed as a standard therapy for HCC in Japan (<xref rid="b4-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). However, recurrence of HCC after resection is known to occur at a high rate, and early recurrence is considered to be a significant prognostic factor for death. Although macroinvasion of HCC to the portal vein is also a factor for poor prognosis (<xref rid="b6-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>), most patients with HCC without macro-tumor thrombosis suffer from recurrence after resection. Previous reports have investigated prognostic markers for early recurrence and survival, including the doubling time of pre-operative serum &#x003B1;-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) (<xref rid="b7-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>), complication with diabetes mellitus (<xref rid="b8-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>), hepatic steatosis (<xref rid="b9-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>) and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage (<xref rid="b10-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>), although these are not adequately sensitive. In the present study, we investigated the predictive value of PET/CT for the pathological malignant potential of HCC as a new indicator for early recurrence after hepatic resection.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>From April 2006 to October 2009, 53 patients with na&#x000EF;ve HCC, examined by PET/CT and treated by hepatic resection, were enrolled. None had poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. All were examined using PET/CT (Discovery ST Elite 16; GE Healthcare Japan Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) within the month prior to resection. PET/CT was performed 60 min after a bolus injection of F-18 FDG (3 MBGq/kg). Accumulations of FDG &#x0005B;standardized uptake value (SUVmax)&#x0005D; in HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver as well as the ratio of SUVmax (R-SUV), which indicated the tumor to non-tumor ratio, were determined. In cases with multiple HCC, the SUVmax was calculated for the main nodule. From these findings, we evaluated prognostic factors for early recurrence, which was defined as recurrence within 2 years of resection. Moreover, R-SUV values were compared to the pathological findings, including microvascular invasion (vp), micro-intrahepatic metastasis (im) and gross type of HCC (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b12-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). The patients were divided into two groups, low R-SUV (n&#x0003D;19) and high R-SUV (n&#x0003D;34), and their clinical parameters were compared.</p>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data are expressed as the mean &#x000B1; standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student&#x00027;s t-test for unpaired data, a &#x003C7;<sup>2</sup> test, Fischer&#x00027;s exact test, a Mann-Whitney U test and a log-rank test, as appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 16.0J (SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A P-value of &#x0003C;0.05 was considered to represent statistical significance.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>One patient was classified as TNM stage I, 35 as stage II, 14 as stage III and 3 as stage IV, based on the results of imaging examinations (abdominal ultrasonography and dynamic CT). There were no cases with extrahepatic metastasis. R-SUV values ranged from 1.0 to 6.9. In pathological analyses, all were diagnosed as typical HCC. PIVKA-II (&#x02265;200 mAU/ml), fucosylated AFP (AFP-L3) (&#x02265;15&#x00025;), tumor size (&#x02265;5 cm) and high R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5) were found to be risk factors for early recurrence in a univariate analysis (P&#x0003C;0.05, respectively) (<xref rid="t1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). In a multivariate analysis, high R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5) was the only risk factor (P&#x0003C;0.05) (<xref rid="t2-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). The recurrence-free rate in the low R-SUV group was higher than that in the high R-SUV group (1- and 2-year recurrence-free rates: 100 and 67&#x00025;, 67 and 17&#x00025;, respectively; P&#x0003C;0.01) (<xref rid="f1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). While the frequencies of high levels of PIVKA-II (&#x02265;200 mAU/ml) and AFP-L3 (&#x02265;15&#x00025;) were greater in the high R-SUV group (52.9 and 38.2&#x00025; vs. 21.1 and 10.5&#x00025;, respectively; P&#x0003C;0.01), there were no significant differences in regard to the frequencies of high levels of AFP (&#x02265;100 ng/ml), tumor diameter &#x02265;5 cm, Child-Pugh class, number of tumors and TNM stage between the groups (<xref rid="t3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>).</p>
<p>Patients with HCC nodules rated as Edmondson III (<xref rid="b13-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) had a higher R-SUV value (3.0&#x000B1;1.8) than those rated as I and II (1.4&#x000B1;0.3 and 1.9&#x000B1;0.9, respectively; P&#x0003C;0.01). Patients with nodules showing vp(&#x0002B;) and im(&#x0002B;), and with non-boundary type of nodules (single nodular type with extranodular growth, confluent multinodular or invasive type) had higher R-SUV values than those with vp(&#x02212;), im(&#x02212;) or boundary type (vaguely nodular or single nodular type) (3.6&#x000B1;2.4 vs. 2.0&#x000B1;0.9, 3.5&#x000B1;2.3 vs. 1.9&#x000B1;0.8 and 2.9&#x000B1;1.8 vs. 1.6&#x000B1;0.5, respectively; P&#x0003C;0.01). Throughout the observation period, extrahepatic metastasis was observed in 2 cases of stage II; these cases had high R-SUV (2.3 and 2.4, respectively). <xref rid="f2-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref> shows representative results of a patient with low R-SUV (1.4) whose pathological findings were single nodular type, Edmondson I, and who was negative for both vp and im. By contrast, <xref rid="f3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref> presents the results of a representative patient with high R-SUV (1.9) whose pathological findings were confluent multinodular type, Edmondson III and positive for vp, though the tumor size was small (2.5 cm in diameter).</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In Japan, the shortage of donors for liver transplantation is a major obstacle to the treatment of HCC, thus hepatic resection is often performed as curative therapy (<xref rid="b4-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). FDG-PET/CT is a functional imaging modality that is used to measure the glucose metabolism of malignant tumors, although its clinical efficacy has not been established. The ability of PET to detect HCC in the liver was found to be less effective than that of contrast enhanced CT (<xref rid="b14-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). On the other hand, Yoon <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b15-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>) and Sugiyama <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b16-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>) reported that PET is useful for the screening of extrahepatic metastasis from HCC. Recently, the usefulness of FDG-PET for predicting HCC recurrence following liver transplantation was proposed (<xref rid="b17-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="b18-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). However, few reports have described FDG-PET as useful for predicting prognosis after resection (<xref rid="b1-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b2-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Kawamura <italic>et al</italic> found that even in patients diagnosed in the early phase of HCC, a high R-SUV value among other prognostic scores may indicate poor prognosis or the need for radical treatment (<xref rid="b3-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). The present results are similar to past reports, which showed that a high R-SUV value is capable of predicting early recurrence after resection, and that the relationship between a high R-SUV and pathological malignant potential is associated with positive findings for im or vp (<xref rid="b19-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>), higher Edmondson grade and worse gross type (<xref rid="b11-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b12-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>) in resected specimens. Since the average R-SUV of Edmondson I was &#x0003C;1.5, we set 1.5 as the cut off; this cut off value predicted the early recurrence of HCC.</p>
<p>Full body scanning with PET/CT is useful for the screening of extrahepatic metastasis and staging in patients with large HCC (<xref rid="b15-etm-01-05-0829" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). An FDG-PET/CT examination is non-invasive and useful for predicting the malignant pathological potential of HCC before resection without the need for a biopsy. However, patients with high R-SUV values must be followed carefully with imaging modalities after resection.</p>
<p>In conclusion, we found that HCC patients with a high R-SUV value (&#x02265;1.5) had an elevated risk of early recurrence after resection, while R-SUV was also shown to be related with pathological findings. Thus, R-SUV is proposed as a useful predictive marker for the early recurrence of HCC before surgical resection.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-etm-01-05-0829"><label>1.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shiomi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishiguchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishizu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodenoxyglucose for predicting outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>Am J Gastroenterol</source><volume>96</volume><fpage>1877</fpage><lpage>1880</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-etm-01-05-0829"><label>2.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hatano</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikai</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Higashi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preoperative positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in predictive of prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after resection</article-title><source>World J Surg</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1736</fpage><lpage>1741</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-etm-01-05-0829"><label>3.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kawamura</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Habu</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohfuji</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Clinical role of FDG-PET for HCC: relationship of glucose metabolic indicator to Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) score</article-title><source>Hepatogastroenterology</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>582</fpage><lpage>586</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-etm-01-05-0829"><label>4.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arii</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamaoka</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Futagawa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan</article-title><source>Hepatology</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>1224</fpage><lpage>1229</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-etm-01-05-0829"><label>5.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ikai</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Arii</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kojiro</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>101</volume><fpage>796</fpage><lpage>802</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-etm-01-05-0829"><label>6.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arii</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamazoe</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Predictive factors for intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after partial hepatectomy</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>913</fpage><lpage>919</lpage><year>1992</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-etm-01-05-0829"><label>7.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masuda</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Beppu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Horino</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preoperative tumor marker doubling time is a useful predictor of recurrence and prognosis after hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>J Surg Oncol</source><month>Nov</month><day>24</day><year>2009</year><comment>(E-pub ahead of print).</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-etm-01-05-0829"><label>8.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Komura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizukoshi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kita</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Impact of diabetes on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical treatment in patients with viral hepatitis</article-title><source>Am J Gastroenterol</source><volume>102</volume><fpage>1939</fpage><lpage>1946</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-etm-01-05-0829"><label>9.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takuma</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nouso</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Makino</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Hepatic steatosis correlates with the postoperative recurrence of hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>Liver Int</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>620</fpage><lpage>626</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-etm-01-05-0829"><label>10.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poon</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>IO</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Clinicopathologic features of long-term survivors and disease-free survivors after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of a prospective cohort</article-title><source>J Clin Oncol</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>3037</fpage><lpage>3044</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-etm-01-05-0829"><label>11.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stroffolini</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Andreone</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Andriulli</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Gross pathologic types of hepatocellular carcinoma in Italy</article-title><source>Oncology</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>192</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-etm-01-05-0829"><label>12.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iguchi</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Aishima</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanefuji</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Both fibrous capsule formation and extracapsular penetration are powerful predictors of poor survival in human hepatocellular carcinoma: a histological assessment of 365 patients in Japan</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>2539</fpage><lpage>2546</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-etm-01-05-0829"><label>13.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edmondson</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Steiner</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Primary carcinoma of the liver. A study of 100 cases among 48900 necrosis necropsies</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>462</fpage><lpage>503</lpage><year>1954</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-etm-01-05-0829"><label>14.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trojan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Schroeder</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Raedle</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Fluorine-18 FDG positron emission tomography for imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>Am J Gastroenterol</source><volume>94</volume><fpage>3314</fpage><lpage>3319</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-etm-01-05-0829"><label>15.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in detecting extrahepatic metastasis in pretreatment staging of hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>Oncology</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>104</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-etm-01-05-0829"><label>16.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugiyama</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakahara</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Torizuka</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>18F-FDG PET in the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>J Gastroenterol</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>961</fpage><lpage>968</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-etm-01-05-0829"><label>17.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Paeng</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prediction of tumor recurrence by 18F-FDG PET in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>682</fpage><lpage>687</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-etm-01-05-0829"><label>18.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Komberg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Freesmeyer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Barthel</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>18F-FDG-uptake of hepatocellular carcinoma on PET predicts microvascular tumor invasion in liver transplant patients</article-title><source>Am J Transplant</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>592</fpage><lpage>600</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-etm-01-05-0829"><label>19.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sumie</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuromatsu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Okuda</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its predictable clinicopathological factors</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1375</fpage><lpage>1382</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Tables</title>
<fig id="f1-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Recurrence rates in both patient groups. A higher level of early recurrence after resection was observed in the high R-SUV group (P&#x0003C;0.01).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ETM-01-05-0829-g00.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption>
<p>Accumulations of FDG (SUV) in both the HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver. The ratio (R-SUV) was calculated using FDG PET/CT findings. Representative case with HCC in the 4th segment of the liver (5.1 cm in diameter). (a) The tumor is observable as a defect in the CT arterial portography findings. (b) A low R-SUV value (1.4) was revealed by FDG PET/CT. (c) Resected specimen showing the tumor as a single nodular type. (d) The tumor was diagnosed as a well-differentiated HCC (Edmondson I) from the histological findings.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ETM-01-05-0829-g01.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative case with HCC in the 8th segment of the liver (2.5 cm in diameter). (a) The tumor is noted as a defect in the CT arterial portography findings. (b) The tumor had a high R-SUV value (1.9) as shown by FDG PET/CT. (c) Resected specimen showing the tumor as a confluent multinodular type with macroinvasion to the 8th portal vein (arrowhead). Invasion of the portal vein was not detected in an imaging examination conducted 2 weeks before surgical resection. (d) The tumor was diagnosed as a poorly differentiated HCC (Edmondson III) upon histological examination.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ETM-01-05-0829-g02.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption>
<p>Univariate analysis of clinical parameters for early recurrence after resection.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Factors</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">No.</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x00025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age in years (&#x0003C;70:&#x02265;70)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">23:30</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.662</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.234&#x02013;1.873</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.437</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Anti-HCV (positive:negative)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">28:25</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.612</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.221&#x02013;1.674</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.345</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender (male:female)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">40:13</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.688</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.189&#x02013;2.507</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.571</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aspartate transferase (IU/l) (&#x0003C;80:&#x02265;80)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">44:9</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">2.501</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.841&#x02013;7.437</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.099</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alanine transferase (IU/l) (&#x0003C;80:&#x02265;80)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">48:5</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3.710</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.956&#x02013;14.402</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.058</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total bilirubin (mg/dl) (&#x0003C;2:&#x02265;2)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">52:1</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.048</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.000&#x02013;2.823</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.810</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Albumin (g/dl) (&#x0003C;3.5:&#x02265;3.5)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">11:42</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1.456</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.307&#x02013;6.904</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.636</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Prothrombin time (&#x00025;) (&#x0003C;80:&#x02265;80)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">25:28</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.923</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.341&#x02013;2.493</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.874</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Platelets (x10<sup>4</sup> cells/&#x003BC;l) (&#x0003C;12:&#x02265;12)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">18:35</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1.453</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.515&#x02013;4.098</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.480</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Child-Pugh (A:B)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">44:9</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1.679</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.352&#x02013;8.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.515</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AFP (ng/ml) (&#x0003C;100:&#x02265;100)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">41:12</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1.996</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.619&#x02013;6.441</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.248</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AFP-L3 (&#x00025;) (&#x0003C;15:&#x02265;15)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">38:15</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3.165</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.101&#x02013;9.095</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.032</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PIVKA-II (mAU/ml) (&#x0003C;200:&#x02265;200)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">31:22</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3.805</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.285&#x02013;11.267</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.016</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Diabetes mellitus (positive:negative)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">16:37</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">0.371</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.102&#x02013;1.354</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.133</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No. of HCC (multiple:single)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">15:38</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">1.578</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.540&#x02013;4.607</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.404</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor size (&#x0003C;5 cm:&#x02265;5 cm)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">31:22</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">3.050</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.036&#x02013;8.983</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.043</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">R-SUV (&#x0003C;1.5:&#x02265;1.5)</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">19:34</td>
<td align="right" valign="top">10.581</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.394&#x02013;80.343</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.023</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-etm-01-05-0829">
<p>CI, confidence interval; HCV, hepatitis C virus; AFP, &#x003B1;-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, fucosylated AFP; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II; TNM stage, tumor node metastasis stage; R-SUV, ratio of accumulations of FDG in HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t2-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption>
<p>Multivariate analysis of clinical parameters for early recurrence after resection.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Factors</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x00025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AFP-L3 (&#x02265;15&#x00025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.644</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.510&#x02013;5.308</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.405</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PIVKA-II (&#x02265;200 mAU/ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.113</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.481&#x02013;9.275</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.322</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor size (&#x02265;5 cm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.157</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.271&#x02013;4.935</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.843</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">R-SUV (&#x02265;1.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.137</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.027&#x02013;64.466</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.047</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn2-etm-01-05-0829">
<p>CI, confidence interval; AFP-L3, fucosylated &#x003B1;-fetoprotein; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II; R-SUV, ratio of accumulations of FDG in HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t3-etm-01-05-0829" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinical background of the patients.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle"/>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Low R-SUV group (n&#x0003D;19)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">High R-SUV group (n&#x0003D;34)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age (years)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68.2&#x000B1;14.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">69.5&#x000B1;10.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.705</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Anti-HCV (positive:negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13:6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15:19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.092</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender (male:female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15:4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25:9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.705</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aspartate transferase (IU/l)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49.4&#x000B1;32.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50.2&#x000B1;25.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.308</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Alanine transferase (IU/l)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40.5&#x000B1;25.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41.5&#x000B1;27.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.934</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Total bilirubin (mg/dl)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.79&#x000B1;0.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.66&#x000B1;0.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.085</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Albumin (g/dl)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.0&#x000B1;0.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.0&#x000B1;0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.555</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Prothrombin time (&#x00025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80.1&#x000B1;12.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">81.2&#x000B1;9.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.127</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Platelets (x10<sup>4</sup> cells/&#x003BC;l)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.0&#x000B1;4.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.0&#x000B1;5.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.696</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Child-Pugh class (A:B)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15:4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">29:5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.528</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AFP (ng/ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">371.2&#x000B1;1,199.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2,306.5&#x000B1;12,657.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.201</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AFP-L3 (&#x00025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.6&#x000B1;5.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.9&#x000B1;23.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x0003C;0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">PIVKA-II (mAU/ml)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">424.4&#x000B1;1,123.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8,436.2&#x000B1;17,683.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor size (&#x0003C;5 cm:&#x02265;5 cm)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14:5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17:17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.077</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No. of tumors</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.4&#x000B1;0.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.4&#x000B1;0.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.819</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Score of up to 7 criteria</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.0&#x000B1;1.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7.4&#x000B1;3.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.013</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TNM stage (I:II:III:IV)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1:13:5:0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0:22:9:3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.320</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Mean R-SUV</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.23&#x000B1;1.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.73&#x000B1;1.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x0003C;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn3-etm-01-05-0829">
<p>HCV, hepatitis C virus; AFP, &#x003B1;-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, fucosylated AFP; PIVKA-II, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II; TNM stage, tumor node metastasis stage; R-SUV, ratio of accumulations of FDG in HCC and non-HCC areas of the liver.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
