ETM Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 1792-0981 1792-1015 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/etm.2015.2520 ETM-0-0-2520 Articles High prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and lack of association with integrin α2 gene polymorphisms in patients with type 2 diabetes from Northeastern Mexico CEPEDA-NIETOANA CECILIA 1 ESQUIVEL-CONTRERASMARÍA TERESA 2 DURAN-IÑIGUEZFRANCISCO 1 SALINAS-SANTANDERMAURICIO ANDRÉS 1 GALLARDO-BLANCOHUGO LEONID 3 ESPARZA-GONZÁLEZSANDRA CECILIA 1 ZUGASTI-CRUZALEJANDRO 2 MORLETT-CHÁVEZJESÚS ANTONIO 2 CÓRDOVA-ALVELAISLUIS TLALOC 1 Research Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila 25000, Mexico Faculty of Chemical Sciences, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Saltillo, Coahuila 25280, Mexico Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León 64460, Mexico Correspondence to: Dr Ana Cecilia Cepeda-Nieto, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Coahuila, Francisco Murguía South 205, Saltillo, Coahuila 25000, Mexico, E-mail: acepedanieto@yahoo.com 08 2015 26 05 2015 10 2 435 444 27082014 30042015 Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications 2015

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the primary causes of blindness in the working age population and is characterized by angiogenesis in the retina. Platelets have been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic microvascular complications. The integrin receptor for collagen/laminin, α2β1, mediates platelet primary adhesion to subendothelial tissues, which is an essential first step in thrombus formation. The gene encoding the α2 subunit of α2β1 integrin has ≥8 polymorphisms, including a BglII/NdeI restriction fragment length polymorphism. To explore the prevalence of DR in a population from Northeastern Mexico, unrelated, hospitalized patients who had received a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at least 10 years previously were recruited (n=177). DR was diagnosed in a masked manner by independent ophthalmologists using fundus images captured using a non-mydriatic retinal camera. A total of 121 patients with DM2 (68%) had some degree of DR development (DR patients), and 56 patients with DM2 (32%) did not exhibit any sign of DR (No-DR patients). The results showed that after 15 years of DM2 progression, there is an increased risk of DR (P=0.0497; odds ratio, 1.993). In addition, insulin therapy and family history of DM2 were significantly associated with DR. In order to detect a possible association between DR and BglII/NdeI α2 gene polymorphisms, a comparative cross-sectional study between DR and No-DR patients was conducted. The α2 gene was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Statistical analysis revealed no association between BglII/NdeI genotypes and the development of DR in this group of patients. In conclusion, the present data indicate a high prevalence of DR in the Mexican population and suggest that the damage in DR is due to other factors, such as the duration of the DM2, and is not linked to BglII/NdeI α2 gene polymorphisms.

 α2 integrin gene polymorphism diabetic retinopathy Mexican population Introduction

The most common complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is diabetic retinopathy (DR), which is a microvascular complication of the retina and remains one of the leading causes of blindness throughout the world (1). The characteristic features of DR include increased vascular permeability and hemostatic abnormalities, which may result in vascular occlusion, irrespective of antidiabetic treatment, and, ultimately, retinal non-perfusion and neovascularization (2). Platelets have been suggested be involved in the pathogenesis of DR (3,4).

DR can be classified into early- and late-stage categories. The early stage of DR, also known as non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), is associated with edema, fluid leakage and restricted blood flow into the eye, in the absence of abnormal neovascularization. By contrast, advanced-stage DR, or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), is characterized by neovascularization and fibrous tissue formation (5).

Population-based studies in different countries have found the prevalence of DR in individuals diagnosed or undiagnosed with DM2 to range from 17.6% in India to 54% in Iran (6–8); however, these data are scarce, as these studies rely on sophisticated diagnostic equipment (7–14). The reported prevalence rate of DR in a Mexican-American population aged ≥40 years was found to be 48% (15,16). In Mexico, a study reported 38.9% DR prevalence in a population from Southern Mexico (17). The high prevalence in Southern Mexico is consistent with data from another study undertaken in Mexico, in which the DR prevalence was 51% (18).

In Coahuila, Mexico, the number of patients with DM2 has increased over recent years (19); therefore, the number of patients with DR is also increasing. To date, there are no recent reports concerning DR prevalence in Northeastern Mexico, and thus investigating the DR prevalence in this region is one of the purposes of this research.

Evidence from ethnic and family studies has suggested that there may be genetic susceptibility for DR. In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, a 3.1-fold increased risk of severe retinopathy was found for subjects with retinopathy-positive relatives, and a correlation for the severity of retinopathy was present among all family members (20). Similar results for the clustering of DR-positive individuals within families were also observed among Southern Indians and Mexican Americans with DM2 (21,22). In the FIND-Eye study, the overall broad-sense heritability for DR was found to be 27%, compared with 24% in Mexican-American families (23). The role of genetics in DR is believed to be responsible for the fact that certain diabetic individuals avoid retinal complications, even following a long history of uncontrolled diabetes, while others rapidly develop DR, despite tight metabolic control (24).

Considerable research has been performed to identify the genetic markers that are associated with the risk of developing DR using an indirect approach, such as case-control association studies, in a number of ethnic populations. In these studies several candidate genes with different functions have been reported to be associated with DR (3,25–33); however, only a fraction of these studies have shown a consistent association with DR or its severity in different populations (25,34–37).

The pathogenesis of DR is linked with vascular permeability, tissue ischemia and angiogenesis (5). Alterations in platelet function are frequent in patients with DM2 and contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of vascular complications (3,14,38,39). Following vascular injury, circulating blood platelets are exposed to subendothelial collagen, a protein that stimulates the matrix adhesion and activation required for platelet thrombus formation. The firm adhesion of platelets to collagen requires the involvement of collagen receptors, such as integrin α2β1 (38,40). Given the important role of integrin receptors in vascular processes and their complications, these receptors are considered a good candidate for investigations into a possible association with the DR in patients with DM2.

Integrin receptors are heterodimeric molecules composed of non-covalently associated α and β subunits that mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion (38,40). α2β1, also known as the platelet membrane glycoprotein Ia-IIa complex or ITGA2, is a membrane glycoprotein expressed in megakaryocytes and blood platelets. This receptor acts as a platelet receptor for collagen (38,40) and mediates the primary adhesion of platelets to subendothelial tissues, which is a crucial first step in the formation of thrombi. The expression levels of the integrin α2β1 in platelets vary significantly among normal individuals, whereas the levels of other integrin receptors do not (40,41).

The gene encoding the α2 subunit of α2β1 integrin has ≥8 polymorphisms, including two conservative changes in the amino acid coding region of α2 at nucleotides 807 (TTT/TTC at codon Phe224) and 873 (ACA/ACG at codon Thr246) of the cDNA sequence (41). These DNA sequence polymorphisms, referred to as 807C and 807T for the 807C/873G and 807T/873A pairs, respectively, in the α2 gene coding region are linked with two polymorphic sites in the α2 gene intron G (3,160 A/G and 3,090 T/C), which correspond to the recognized sites by BglII and NdeI restriction enzymes, respectively (41).

The BglII and NdeI recognition sites in intron G of the α2 gene are used to genotype three different α2 gene alleles defined by eight nucleotide polymorphisms, including the 807C and 807T polymorphisms, using BglII/NdeI restriction analysis (41). The allele BglII (+)/NdeI (+) has been linked to 807T polymorphism, which is associated with high levels of platelet integrin α2β1 expression, while allele BglII (-)/NdeI (-) has been linked to 807C polymorphism and is associated with low levels of platelet integrin α2β1 (3,4,41).

Associations between the BglII polymorphism and the prevalence of DR have been reported in Japanese (3) and Caucasian (25) diabetic patients, and the BglII (+) allele in these two ethnic groups has been shown to be a risk factor for DR; however, the association between the BglII/NdeI polymorphism and the prevalence of DR has not yet been studied in patients with DM2 from Northeastern Mexico. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to test the hypothesis that a genetic variation in the α2 integrin gene is associated with the development of DR by analyzing the possible association between the intronic polymorphic sites BglII and NdeI of the α2 gene and the susceptibility to DR among Mexican diabetic patients with ≥10 years of DM2 history.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>Study subjects

A comparative cross-sectional hospital study was performed to analyze the clinical characteristics of DR and to explore the genetic association between DR and polymorphic variants of the α2 gene. Unrelated Mexican patients who had been diagnosed with DM2 ≥10 years previously (n=177; 108 males, 69 females) were recruited at the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) Hospital (Saltillo, Mexico). Diabetes was defined according to the report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (42). Only DM2 patients were included in this study, and the study was performed in accordance with the ethics standards of the Dr Gonzalo Valdés University Hospital of the Autonomous University of Coahuila (Saltillo, Mexico). The University Hospital-Autonomous University of Coahuila Institutional Review Board approved and registered the study under the code FM001-10.

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects enrolled following an explanation of the nature of the study. Patients with known DM2 for a duration of <10 years, patients who had not voluntarily agreed to participate in the study and those who did not have a laboratory workup were excluded from the study.

 Clinical data collection and study group classification

DR was diagnosed in a masked manner by independent ophthalmologists using fundus images captured using a Canon CR-DGi non-mydriatic retinal camera with the Eye Q Prime software (Canon USA, Inc., Lake Success, NY, USA) in patients with a DM2 duration of ≥10 years. Patients with DM2 but without DR (No-DR group, n=56) were compared with DM2 patients with DR of either the NPDR or PDR subtype (DR group, n=121) according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria (5).

The following clinical and biochemical characteristics were analyzed for all patients with DM2 (No-DR and DR groups): Age (years), gender, duration of diabetes (years), systolic and diastolic pressure (mmHg), fasting plasma glucose (mg/dl), cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl), cataracts, glaucoma and insulin use. Documented information also included family history of DM, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia and renal failure. Peripheral blood was obtained from all patients with DM2 following a 12-h fast for biochemical analysis.

 DNA extraction

Peripheral venous blood samples (5 ml) were obtained from the DR and No-DR patients and were collected in EDTA tubes (BD Vacutainer®; Becton Dickinson, Mexico City, Mexico). The samples were centrifuged using a refrigerated centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and the buffy coat was processed for high-molecular weight genomic DNA isolation by the salting-out method, and suspended in Tris-EDTA (pH 7.8; Mallinckrodt Baker, Inc., Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), at a final concentration of 0.1–1.0 µg/µl.

 Genotyping for the α2 gene 3,160 A/G and 3,090 T/C polymorphisms

Genotyping for the α2 gene was performed to analyze the possible genetic association between DR and the polymorphic variants of the α2 gene. The 3,160 A/G and 3,090 T/C polymorphism of the α2 intron G region were tested. The α2 gene was genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis, as previously reported (41), using an MJ Mini™ Gradient Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), followed by BglII and NdeI [New England Biolabs (NEB), Ipswich, MA, USA] restriction enzyme analysis. In brief, the method for the PCR was as follows: 250 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 µM primers (forward, 5′-GAT TTA ACT TTC CCG ACT GCC TTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CAT AGG TTT TTG GGG AAC AGG TGG-3′), 0.2 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) were combined to form the reaction mixture. The 600-bp segment of intron G encompassing the BglII and NdeI sites was amplified from genomic DNA in a final volume of 25 µl using the following conditions: 2 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 69°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min; 2 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 67°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min; and 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 65°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min. The PCR samples (∼1 µg) were digested overnight with BglII and NdeI (NEB) at 37°C in a temperature-controlled water bath (Bio-Rad). The digested amplicons were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels using ethidium bromide (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and a 2UV™ transilluminator (UVP, LLC, Upland, CA, USA).

The 3,160 A allele, BglII (+), and the 3,090 T allele, NdeI (+), of the α2 gene result in the gain of restriction sites for the enzymes BglII and NdeI, respectively (41). When the 3,160 A allele or and 3,090 T allele were present, the 600-bp PCR product was digested with BglII or NdeI enzyme, respectively, generating two fragments of 400 and 200 bp (41). The 3,160 G allele, BglII (-), and the 3,090 C allele, Nde I (-), were detected by an absence of cuts by the BglII or NdeI enzyme, respectively, leaving the 600-bp PCR fragment intact.

 Statistical analysis

All collected data were organized in a database in preparation for statistical calculations. Quantitative variables (age, systolic and diastolic pressure, total cholesterol levels, triglyceride and fasting plasma glucose levels) were compared between the No-DR and DR patients with DM2 using a Student's t-test, and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The risk factors for DR were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism version 4.0 software for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Fisher's exact tests were used for univariate analysis to compare the clinical and biochemical characteristics, as well as the family history data, between No-DR and DR diabetic patients. The estimated odds ratio (OR) was assessed by two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). The difference was considered statistically significant when P≤0.05.

The polymorphism statistical analyses were performed using the SNP and Variation Suite version 8.1.5 (Golden Helix, Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA) and the Epi Info™ 7 statistical program (USD Inc., Stone Mountain, GA, USA). Analyses of allele and genotype frequency counts were performed using the χ2 test. For the validation of the genotypes, the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was analyzed using a Fisher's exact test (significant deviation from HWE at P>0.05).

To analyze the association between the DR genotypes and the clinical, biochemical and family history data of the DM2 patients, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to fit the binary response, using regression coefficients for continuous predictors and indicator coefficients for categorical predictors. Association studies were performed by genotypic tests with correlation to assess the ORs, 95% CI and P-value. The Bonferroni P-value and false discovery rate (FDR) were calculated to exclude spurious associations. An OR (95% CI) >1 and a P-value P≤0.05 were considered significant.

 Results <sec> <title>Clinical characteristics of the study population

The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of DR and a possible association between DR and two α2 gene polymorphisms. The analyzed population comprised clinically diagnosed DM2 patients who attended the IMSS Hospital (Northwestern Mexico). Patients that had been diagnosed with DM2 ≥10 years previously (n=177; 108 males, 69 females) were selected for the study and examined by a certified ophthalmologist.

Fundus images were captured using a Canon CR-DGi non-mydriatic retinal camera using the Eye Q Prime software (Canon USA, Inc.). All images were analyzed and the DR progress was determined. A total of 121 patients with DM2 had some degree of DR development (DR group, 68%) and 56 patients with DM2 did not exhibit any sign of DR (No-DR group, 32%). Among the patients with DM2 who developed DR, 41.32% had NPDR and 58.67% had PDR, according to the ETDRS criteria (5).

The baseline characteristics of the 177 patients with DM2 are summarized in Table I. No significant difference between the No-DR and DR groups was found for the variables analyzed (age, cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, systolic/diastolic blood pressure). The majority of the patients were male (DR group, 60%; No-DR group, 62%), and no significant difference in gender was found between the No-DR and DR groups (Table II). The age of the patients ranged from 28 to 89 years, with a median age of 59.68 years. More than half (85%) of the participants had an age of >50 years. The majority of the No-DR (87.5%) and DR (85.71%) patients were in the >50 years age group (Table II).

The majority of studies on DR indicate the importance of the duration of the diabetes when considering a higher incidence and progression of DR (26,43–45). In the present study it was found that there was an increased risk of DR in cases of DM2 with a duration of ≥15 years (OR, 1.993; 95% CI, 1.028–3.863; P=0.0497). Other clinical characteristics, such as hypertension, glaucoma, cataract, renal disease, dyslipidemia and glycemic control, showed no association with the presence of DR in the analyzed patients (P>0.05) (Table II); however, a significant association was found between the use of insulin therapy and the presence of DR (P=0.0290) with an OR value of 0.4026 (95% CI, 0.1793–0.9040) (Table II).

Regarding the family history of the patients, a significant association between DR and a family history of DM2 was found (P=0.0291), with an OR value of 0.4561 (95% CI, 0.2280–0.9127) (Table III). Other variables in the family history were not associated with the presence of DR (P>0.05) (Table III).

 Genotypes and DR susceptibility

The alleles of the α2 gene in Mexican patients with DM2 were identified using the BglII/NdeI sites with RFLP assays. The statistical results obtained from the PCR-RFLP studies are shown in Table IV. With both polymorphisms, the heterozygous genotypes were the most prevalent in the DR [BglII (A/G), 74.4%; NdeI (T/C), 94.2%] and No-DR [BglII (A/G), 62.5%; NdeI (T/C), 96.4%] patients. Homozygous genotypes for BglIII (+) and NdeI (+) were not found in the DM2 population tested. Statistical analysis revealed no association between heterozygous BglII/NdeI genotypes or BglII/NdeI-negative genotypes and the development of DR in this patient group (P>0.05) (Table IV).

In order to assess the HWE, the data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test. For BglII, the P-values in the No-DR and DR groups were 0.000423 and 1.204×10−12, respectively; for NdeI, the P-values in the No-DR and DR groups were 1.080×10−13 and 7.966×10−27, respectively. In all HWE analyses, the P-value was <0.05, indicating that the genotypes were not in HWE in the No-DR and DR patients.

 Genetic polymorphisms and family history of diseases

In addition to the clinical data, a family history of the DM2-related conditions showed no statistically significant associations with the genotypes obtained by the RFLP assays (P>0.05) (Table V). In the initial analyses, a significant association with DR was observed for family history of cardiovascular disease (BglII AG genotype: OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.04–4.40; P=0.037) and hypertension (BglII GG genotype: OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.08–5.29; P=0.029); however, the significance of the association between these genotypes and cardiovascular disease susceptibility or hypertension was lost following the application of the Bonferroni correction and FDR (P>0.05) (Table V).

 Discussion

DM2 is a growing health problem in Mexico and represents a significant cause of mortality and complications such as diabetic foot, nephropathy and retinopathy. An increase in the number of diabetic patients has been predicted; therefore, it is expected that the incidence of patients with DR will show a corresponding increase (19).

The present study comprised a comparative cross-sectional hospital study in Northeastern Mexico with patients who had a history of DM2 of ≥10 years. The patients with DM2 were clinically examined by an ophthalmologist to determine if they had DR. The prevalence of DR in the analyzed Mexican population with DM2 was 68%. To date, there have been no reports of a prevalence of DR as high as that found in this study. A high prevalence (DR 48%) has been reported in a Mexican-American population aged ≥40 years living in Arizona (15) and Latinos living in California (16). The prevalence of DR found in the present study is higher than the last records found for a Mexican population, which gave prevalences of 38.9% (17) and 51% (18); however, this coincides with the exponential increase in obesity and DM2 in the country.

Population-based studies have been conducted in several countries using photographic evidence of DR. These studies have reported a DR prevalence of 10–20% in France (9), 22% in Australia (10) and Barbados (46), 27% in Fiji (11), 54% in Iran (7), 37% in China (47), 11% in India (48) and 24.8% in the USA (12).

Although the mechanisms underlying the development of DR have yet to be elucidated, numerous risk factors have been described, including poor glycemic control, longer diabetes duration, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and albuminuria (45,49). Previous studies have found a significant correlation between elevated serum cholesterol/triglycerides and the risk and severity of DR (50,51). By contrast, other studies have shown an absence of significant correlation between elevated serum cholesterol/triglycerides and the risk of DR (25,52,53). In the present study it was found that although the levels of glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride in the patients with DM2 were above levels considered normal, these abnormal results appeared to have no association with the development of DR (P>0.05) (Table I). Hyperglycemia was observed in 73.55% of patients in the DR group and 78.57% of patients in the No-DR group (P=0.5758) (Table II). Compared with values reported in other studies (54–57), the prevalence of dyslipidemia (including isolated triglyceridemia, isolated cholesterolemia and mixed) was high, with the condition affecting 65.29% of patients in the DR group and 58.93% in the No-DR group.

Another DR risk factor analyzed was the duration of DM2. The importance of this factor to a higher incidence and progression of DR has been previously reported (26,43,44,58). Consistent with these studies, the present results revealed that patients who had a DM2 history of >15 years had an increased risk of DR (OR, 1.993; 95% CI, 1.028–3.863; P=0.0497) (Table II). Conversely, the age factor did not represent a DR risk, which coincided with a previous report analyzing the correlation between age and the severity of the DR (59).

Regarding gender, it was found that males predominated in both the DR and No-DR groups, which demonstrated that gender was not a risk factor for the development of DR (Table II). Others studies have shown an inconsistency when investigating whether gender is a risk factor for the development of DR; while some studies found a higher prevalence of DR in women (51,60), other studies have claimed that the severity of the disease is associated with the male gender (53,59). Furthermore, studies of the prevalence of DR have indicated that the disease occurs in similar proportions among men and women (26,61,62). Further studies are required to determine the causes of this inconsistency in the prevalence of DR according to gender in different populations.

Contradictory results have also been found for hypertension. While there are reports indicating that hypertension is not a risk factor for DR (44,60), a larger number of studies argue for a link between the presence of hypertension and the development of DR (26,53,59). In addition, several studies have reported an association between DR and the systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure (43,50–52). In the present study, a significant correlation between the blood pressure values and the development of the DR was not found (P>0.05) (Table II); however, the fact that any hypertension in the analyzed patients was already controlled by medical specialists could have affected the present results.

Another widely studied factor is the use of insulin in patients with DM2 to control the disease. Insulin therapy was found to be significantly associated with DR in the patients with DM2 in the present study (P=0.0290) (Table II); however, the OR obtained indicates that insulin therapy is not a risk factor for DR (OR, 0.4026; 95% CI, 0.1793–0.9040). This finding suggests that, in the Mexican population analyzed, treatment with insulin prevented the development of DR in DM2 patients receiving insulin therapy, compared with DM2 patients that did not receive this therapy. The present results differed from studies with Japanese (52) and Iranian (53) patients with DM2, which reported insulin therapy to be a DR risk factor.

Concerning the genetic analysis, PCR-RFLP assays were used to analyze two polymorphisms in intron G of the α2 gene (3,160 A/G and 3,090 T/C) using BglII and NdeI restriction enzymes; these polymorphisms were found to be associated with the presence of DR in the diabetic patients. The results obtained for the genotyping of the α2 gene are the first, to the best of our knowledge, to be made for the Mexican population. The distribution of the BglII/NdeI genotypes, as well as the frequency of the respective alleles, in the DR and No-DR patients was similar (Table IV). With both polymorphisms, the heterozygous genotypes were the most prevalent in the DR and No-DR patients. Statistical analysis revealed no association between the BglII/NdeI genotypes and the development of DR in this patients group (P>0.05) (Table IV).

The fact that this study did not find a significant correlation between the BglII/NdeI genotypes of the α2 gene and DR in the analyzed Mexican population marks an important precedent in this type of study aimed at finding the genes associated with diabetic complications in Mexican population. This finding, together with the absence of the BglII (3,160 A/A) and NdeI (3,090 T/T) genotypes in the analyzed population with DM2 reflects the ethnic differences and genetic heterogeneity among populations. Furthermore, it was observed in the present study that the BglII/NdeI polymorphisms were not in HWE. Deviation from the HWE was noted in both groups (DR and No-DR); the fact that there was deviation from the HWE in the No-DR group indicated that one or more of the model requirements may have been violated. If the possibility of genotyping error is discarded it can be assumed that there are other factors that influenced this outcome and that directly affected the observed allele frequencies. We suggest that the existence of inbreeding in the group analyzed and the insufficient sample size could have been the possible causes of this result, as well as the factors influencing this outcome that directly affected the observed allele frequencies. In the case of inbreeding, although the selection criteria excluded a family relationship between patients, at the level of the population analyzed this phenomenon could be occurring. Furthermore, it was observed that the genotypic frequencies of the BglII and NdeI polymorphisms showed no significant difference in the two study groups (DR and No-DR). Another factor that cannot be ruled out is the sample size, and particularly the group size of the No-DR patients. Given the vast problem of DM2 in the Mexican population and the lack of adequate control of this disease, there were few patients who had a ≥10-year history of DM2 who did not exhibit some degree of DR.

The present results differed from similar studies in Asian and Caucasian populations, where there was a significant correlation between the presence of the BglII genotype (A/A) and the BglII (A) allele in the development of DR (3,25). To date, few studies have reported genes associated with DR, and the reported results are inconsistent (63). DM2 is a multigenic and multifactorial disease; therefore the DR depends on the factors driving the DM2 (59,63). Similar results to those described in the present study can be found in the literature, particularly in an analysis conducted on the association between the α2β1 807T allele and the development of DR in French patients with DM2, giving support to the present findings (64).

The polymorphisms in the G intronic region containing the BglII and NdeI recognition sites are used to infer the α2 gene haplotypes, including polymorphisms 807C and 873T of exons 7 and 8, respectively. These polymorphisms have been associated with differences in the platelet α2β1 receptor density (41,65) and several diseases, such as retinal diseases (66,67), colorectal cancer (68) and ischemic stroke risk (69). Based on the HWE results obtained in the present study, and considering that i) the method of Kritzik et al (41), which was used in the present study to detect the α2 gene polymorphisms 807C and 873T, is an indirect detection method; and ii) the intronic region, where the recognition sites of BglII and NdeI are present, is the gene region with most susceptibility to variations, we suggest that the intronic BglII and NdeI polymorphic sites in the Mexican population are not linked to exonic 807C and 873T nucleotide polymorphic sites and therefore cannot detect the α2 gene haplotypes reported (41).

In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate a high prevalence of DR that had not been previously described in patients with type 2 diabetes from Northeastern Mexico. No significant association was detected between the frequencies of the genotypes and alleles for the α2 gene polymorphisms BglII and NdeI and the development of DR in the DM2 population. The duration of DM2 ≥15 years was the only risk factor linked with the development of DR.

 Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the SEP-PROMEP and the General Coordination of Graduate Studies and Research of the Autonomous University of Coahuila. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Tania Batallar-Gómez for providing blood samples from the patients and Dr Carmen Aleida Flores-Flores for suggestions in the preparation of written English. The authors would also like to thank the patients with DM2 for their participation in the study.

 References FosterAResnikoffSThe impact of Vision 2020 on global blindnessEye (Lond)1911331135200510.1038/sj.eye.670197316304595 CongdonNGFriedmanDSLietmanTImportant causes of visual impairment in the world todayJAMA29020572060200310.1001/jama.290.15.205714559961 MatsubaraYMurataMMaruyamaTAssociation between diabetic retinopathy and genetic variations in alpha2beta1 integrin, a platelet receptor for collagenBlood9515601564200010688808 KunickiTJKritzikMAnnisDSNugentDJHereditary variation in platelet integrin alpha 2 beta 1 density is associated with two silent polymorphisms in the alpha 2 gene coding sequenceBlood891939194319979058714 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research GroupGrading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs - an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10Ophthalmology98786806199110.1016/S0161-6420(13)38012-92062513 YauJWRogersSLKawasakiRMeta-Analysis for Eye Disease (META-EYE) Study GroupGlobal prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathyDiabetes Care35556564201210.2337/dc11-190922301125 HosseiniSMMaracyMRAminiMBaradaranHRA risk score development for diabetic retinopathy screening in Isfahan-IranJ Res Med Sci14105110200921772868 RamavatPRRamavatMRGhugareBWVaishnavRGJoshiMUPrevalence of diabetic retinopathy in western Indian type 2 diabetic population: A hospital-based cross-sectional studyJ Clin Diagn Res713871390201323998071 DelcourtCMassinPRosilioMEpidemiology of diabetic retinopathy: Expected vs reported prevalence of cases in the French populationDiabetes Metab35431438200910.1016/j.diabet.2009.06.00219892578 TappRJShawJEHarperCAAusDiab Study GroupThe prevalence of and factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in the Australian populationDiabetes Care2617311737200310.2337/diacare.26.6.173112766102 BrianGFischer-HarderKDiabetic eye disease among adults in Fiji with self-reported diabetesClin Experiment Ophthalmol38867874201010.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02361.x20572814 WongTYKleinRIslamFMCotchMFFolsomARKleinBESharrettARSheaSDiabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United StatesAm J Ophthalmol141446455200610.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.06316490489 KleinRKleinBEMossSELintonKLThe Beaver Dam Eye Study. Retinopathy in adults with newly discovered and previously diagnosed diabetes mellitusOphthalmology995862199210.1016/S0161-6420(92)32011-11741141 FerreiroJLGómez-HospitalJAAngiolilloDJPlatelet abnormalities in diabetes mellitusDiab Vasc Dis Res7251259201010.1177/147916411038399420921090 WestSKMuñozBKleinRRisk factors for Type II diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VERAm J Ophthalmol134390398200210.1016/S0002-9394(02)01595-712208251 VarmaRTorresMPeñaFLos Angeles Latino Eye Study GroupPrevalence of diabetic retinopathy in adult Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino eye studyOphthalmology11112981306200410.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.00215234129 PolackSYorstonDLópez-RamosARapid assessment of avoidable blindness and diabetic retinopathy in Chiapas, MexicoOphthalmology11910331040201210.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.00222342012 GonzálezVillalpando MEGonzálezVillalpando CArredondoPérez BSternMPDiabetic retinopathy in Mexico. Prevalence and clinical characteristicsArch Med Res2535536019947803988 INEGIStatistics About the World Diabetes DayNational Institute of Statics and Geographywww.inegi.org.mx/inegi/default.aspx?s=inegi&c=2894&pred=1AccessedNovember142013(In Spanish) The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupClustering of long-term complications in families with diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trialDiabetes4618291839199710.2337/diab.46.11.18299356033 RemaMSaravananGDeepaRMohanVFamilial clustering of diabetic retinopathy in South Indian Type 2 diabetic patientsDiabet Med19910916200210.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00820.x12421427 HallmanDMHuberJCJrGonzalezVHKleinBEKleinRHanisCLFamilial aggregation of severity of diabetic retinopathy in Mexican Americans from Starr County, TexasDiabetes Care2811631168200510.2337/diacare.28.5.116315855583 ArarNHFreedmanBIAdlerSGFamily Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes Research GroupHeritability of the severity of diabetic retinopathy: The FIND-Eye studyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci4938393845200810.1167/iovs.07-163318765632 BarnettAHPathogenesis of diabetic microangiopathy: An overviewAm J Med90(6A)67S73S199110.1016/0002-9343(91)90421-S1872307 PetrovicMGHawlinaMPeterlinBPetrovičDBglII gene polymorphism of the alpha2beta1 integrin gene is a risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in Caucasians with type 2 diabetesJ Hum Genet48457460200310.1007/s10038-003-0060-012938014 BuraczynskaMKsiazekPBaranowicz-GaszczykIJozwiakLAssociation of the VEGF gene polymorphism with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes patientsNephrol Dial Transplant22827832200710.1093/ndt/gfl64117121786 LiHLoueyJWChoyKWEDN1 Lys198Asn is associated with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetesMol Vis1416981704200818806884 CostaVCasamassimiAEspositoKCharacterization of a novel polymorphism in PPARG regulatory region associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in ItalyJ Biomed Biotechnol2009126917200910.1155/2009/12691719125195 NakamuraSIwasakiNFunatsuHKitanoSIwamotoYImpact of variants in the VEGF gene on progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathyGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol2472126200910.1007/s00417-008-0915-318709380 ChoHSobrinLGenetics of diabetic retinopathyCurr Diab Rep14515201410.1007/s11892-014-0515-z24952107 UhlmannKKovacsPBoettcherYHammesHPPaschkeRGenetics of diabetic retinopathyExp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes114275294200610.1055/s-2006-92426016868886 ZhangTPangCLiNZhouEZhaoKPlasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G polymorphism and retinopathy risk in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysisBMC Med1119201310.1186/1741-7015-11-123281898 Qian-QianYYongYJingZDong-HongFAssociation between a 27-bp variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism in intron 4 of the eNOS gene and risk for diabetic retinopathy Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysisCurr Eye Res3910521058201410.3109/02713683.2014.89407824673412 AbharySHewittAWBurdonKPCraigJEA systematic meta-analysis of genetic association studies for diabetic retinopathyDiabetes5821372147200910.2337/db09-005919587357 LiuLYuQWangHAssociation of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 polymorphisms with retinopathy in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetesDiabet Med23643648200610.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01884.x16759306 QiuMXiongWLiaoHLiFVEGF-634G>C polymorphism and diabetic retinopathy risk: A meta-analysisGene518310315201310.1016/j.gene.2013.01.01823353010 McAuleyAKWangJJDiraniMReplication of genetic loci implicated in diabetic retinopathyInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci5516661671201410.1167/iovs.13-1355924526447 PlowEFMellerJByzovaTVIntegrin function in vascular biology: A view from 2013Curr Opin Hematol21241247201410.1097/MOH.000000000000004224626045 Caunedo-AlmagroPHemostatic alterations in diabetes mellitusRev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter21192005(In Spanish) SaboorMAyubQIlyasSMoinuddinPlatelet receptors: An instrumental of platelet physiologyPak J Med Sci29891896201310.12669/pjms.293.349724353652 KritzikMSavageBNugentDJNucleotide polymorphisms in the alpha2 gene define multiple alleles that are associated with differences in platelet alpha2 beta1 densityBlood922382238819989746778 Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes MellitusReport of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitusDiabetes Care26(Suppl 1)S5S20200310.2337/diacare.26.2007.S512502614 RayDMishraMRalphSAssociation of the VEGF gene with proliferative diabetic retinopathy but not proteinuria in diabetesDiabetes53861864200410.2337/diabetes.53.3.86114988276 WestSKKleinRRodriguezJProyecto VERDiabetes and diabetic retinopathy in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VERDiabetes Care2412041209200110.2337/diacare.24.7.120411423503 MaghbooliZPasalarPKeshtkarAFarzadfarFLarijaniBPredictive factors of diabetic complications: a possible link between family history of diabetes and diabetic retinopathyJ Diabetes Metab Disord1355201410.1186/2251-6581-13-5524860795 LeskeMCWuSYHennisABarbados Eye Study GroupHyperglycemia, blood pressure, and the 9-year incidence of diabetic retinopathy: The Barbados Eye StudiesOphthalmology12799805200510.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.054 WangFHLiangYBZhangFPrevalence of diabetic retinopathy in rural China: The Handan Eye StudyOphthalmology116461467200910.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.00319168222 NirmalanPKKatzJRobinALPrevalence of vitreoretinal disorders in a rural population of southern India: The Aravind Comprehensive Eye StudyArch Ophthalmol122581586200410.1001/archopht.122.4.58115078677 SinghRRamasamyKAbrahamCGuptaVGuptaADiabetic retinopathy: An updateIndian J Ophthalmol56178188200818417817 van LeidenHADekkerJMMollACBlood pressure, lipids, and obesity are associated with retinopathy: The Hoorn StudyDiabetes Care2513201325200210.2337/diacare.25.8.132012145228 HallmanDMBoerwinkleEGonzalezVHA genome-wide linkage scan for diabetic retinopathy susceptibility genes in Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes from Starr County, TexasDiabetes5611671173200710.2337/db06-137317251272 AwataTInoueKKuriharaSA common polymorphism in the 5′-untranslated region of the VEGF gene is associated with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetesDiabetes5116351639200210.2337/diabetes.51.5.163511978667 JavadiMAKatibehMRafatiNPrevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Tehran province: A population-based studyBMC Ophthalmol912200910.1186/1471-2415-9-1219835608 Martinez-HervasSCarmenaRAscasoJFPrevalence of plasma lipid abnormalities and its association with glucose metabolism in Spain: The di@bet.es studyClin Investig Arterioscler26107114201410.1016/j.arteri.2013.12.00124461346 ArauzARomanoJGRuiz-FrancoADifferences in lipid profiles in two Hispanic ischemic stroke populationsInt J Stroke9394399201410.1111/ijs.1223924898282 Escobedo-de la PeñaJde Jesús-PérezRSchargrodskyHChampagneBPrevalence of dyslipidemias in Mexico city and Its relation to other cardiovascular risk factors. Results from the CARMELA studyGac Med Mex1501281362014(In Spanish)24603993 TóthPPPotterDMingEEPrevalence of lipid abnormalities in the United States: The National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 2003–2006J Clin Lipidol6325330201210.1016/j.jacl.2012.05.00222836069 Rodríguez-VillalobosERamírez-BarbaEJCervantes-AguayoFThe incidence and opportunity for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathySalud Publica Mex362752801994(In Spanish)7940008 ChatziralliIPSergentanisTNKeryttopoulosPRisk factors associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2BMC Res Notes3153201010.1186/1756-0500-3-15320515457 Prado-SerranoAGuido-JiménezMCamas-BenítezJPrevalence of diabetic retinopathy in a Mexican populationRev Mex Oftalmol832612662009(In Spanish) KempenJHO'ColmainBJLeskeMCEye Diseases Prevalence Research GroupThe prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United StatesArch Ophthalmol122552563200410.1001/archopht.122.4.55215078674 SmithTSTSzetuJBourneRRThe prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy, associated risk factors and vision loss in patients registered with type 2 diabetes in Luganville, VanuatuBr J Ophthalmol91415419200710.1136/bjo.2006.10417417077115 KuoJZWongTYRotterJIChallenges in elucidating the genetics of diabetic retinopathyJAMA Ophthalmol13296107201410.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.502424201651 ArsèneSPouplardCPerrodeauENo association between the ITGA2 807T allele and retinopathy in french patients with type 2 diabetesThromb Res128293295201110.1016/j.thromres.2011.05.00921632096 JacquelinBTarantinoMDKritzikMAllele-dependent transcriptional regulation of the human integrin alpha2 geneBlood9717211726200110.1182/blood.V97.6.172111238113 DinauerDMFriedmanKDHessnerMJAllelic distribution of the glycoprotein Ia (alpha2-integrin) C807T/G873A dimorphisms among caucasian venous thrombosis patients and six racial groupsBr J Haematol107563565199910.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01753.x10583259 DodsonPMHaynesJStarczynskiJThe platelet glycoprotein Ia/IIa gene polymorphism C807T/G873A: A novel risk factor for retinal vein occlusionEye (Lond)17772777200310.1038/sj.eye.670045212928694 GergerAHofmannGLangsenlehnerUIntegrin alpha-2 and beta-3 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer riskInt J Colorectal Dis24159163200910.1007/s00384-008-0587-918836731 WuGXiYYaoLGenetic polymorphism of ITGA2 C807T can increase the risk of ischemic strokeInt J Neurosci124841851201410.3109/00207454.2013.87971824397542

Baseline characteristics of the type 2 diabetic patients.

Characteristic No-DR group DR group P-value
Age, years 61.6±11.48 58.7±9.51 0.0616
Total cholesterol, mg/dl 223.2±70.83 232.7±71.78 0.2668
Tryglicerides, mg/dl 198.4±93.12 188.0±123.10 0.3189
Glucose, mg/dl 165.5±64.63 168.0±74.11 0.9321
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 119.3±15.24 123.9±19.04 0.6873
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 76.1±10.62 76.9±12.86 0.2384

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. DR, diabetic retinopathy.

Analysis of risk factors for DR in patients with DM2.

Variable No DR, n (%) DR, n (%) P-value
Gender
  Male 35 (62.50) 73 (60.33) 0.8693
  Female 21 (37.50) 48 (39.66)
Agea
  <50 years 7 (12.50) 17 (14.28) 0.8181
  ≥50 years 49 (87.50) 102 (85.71)
Duration of DM2a
  <15 years 36 (65.45) 58 (48.74) 0.0497
  ≥15 years 19 (34.54) 61 (51.26)
Hypertension
  Yes 36 (64.29) 80 (66.12) 0.8655
  No 20 (35.71) 41 (33.88)
Cataract
  Yes 18 (32.14) 49 (40.50) 0.3204
  No 38 (67.86) 72 (59.50)
Glaucoma
  Yes 3 (5.36) 14 (11.57) 0.2745
  No 53 (94.64) 107 (88.43)
Kidney disease
  Yes 6 (10.71) 26 (21.49) 0.0957
  No 50 (89.29) 95 (78.51)
Insulin therapy
  Yes 9 (16.07) 39 (32.23) 0.0290
  No 47 (83.93) 82 (67.77)
Dyslipidemia
  Yes 33 (58.93) 79 (65.29) 0.5027
  No 23 (41.07) 42 (34.71)
Glycemia
  Yes 44 (78.57) 89 (73.55) 0.5758
  No 12 (21.43) 32 (26.45)

Missing data. DR, diabetic retinopathy; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Family characteristics associated with DR in the patients with DM2.

Characteristic No-DR group, n (%) DR group, n (%) P-value
DR
  Yes 9 (16.07) 31 (25.62) 0.1802
  No 47 (83.93) 90 (74.38)
DM2
  Yes 35 (62.50) 95 (78.51) 0.0291
  No 21 (37.50) 26 (21.49)
Dyslipidemia
  Yes 23 (41.07) 49 (40.50) 1.0000
  No 33 (58.93) 72 (59.50)
Hypertension
  Yes 33 (58.93) 70 (57.85) 1.0000
  No 23 (41.07) 51 (42.15)
Cardiovascular disease
  Yes 23 (41.07) 42 (34.71) 0.5027
  No 33 (58.93) 79 (65.29)
Kidney disease
  Yes 6 (10.71) 19 (15.70) 0.4884
  No 50 (89.29) 102 (84.30)

DR, diabetic retinopathy; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Genotype and allele frequencies of α2 integrin BglII and NdeI polymorphisms in patients with and without DR.

A, BglII
Genotypes and alleles No-DR group, n (%) DR group, n (%) χ2 OR 95% CI P-value
Genotypes
  GG 21 (37.50) 31 (25.60) 2.5895 1.7362 0.87–3.43 0.1076
  AG 35 (62.50) 90 (74.40) 2.5895 0.5760 0.29–1.14 0.1076
  AA 0 (0) 0 (0)
Alleles
  G 77 (68.75) 152 (62.80) 1.1794 1.3017 0.81–2.11 0.2775
  A 35 (31.25) 90 (37.20) 1.1794 0.7682 0.47–1.23 0.2775
B, NdeI
Genotypes and alleles No-DR group, n (%) DR group, n (%) χ2 OR 95% CI P-value
Genotypes
  CC 2 (3.60) 7 (5.80) 0.3865 0.6047 0.08–2.82 0.5341
  TC 54 (96.40) 114 (94.20) 0.3865 1.6536 0.35–11.95 0.5341
  TT 0 (0) 0 (0)
Alleles
  C 58 (51.80) 28 (52.90) 0.0375 0.9567 0.61–1.50 0.8464
  T 54 (48.20) 14 (47.10) 0.0375 1.0452 0.66–1.64 0.8464

DR, diabetic retinopathy; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Association of BglII and NdeI genotypes with clinical and biochemical characteristics in patients with DM2.

A, BglII (risk allele, A; no-risk allele, G)
Frequency of AA/AG/GG genotypes, n (%)
Variable DR patients No-DR patients P-valuec OR (95% CI)
Cataract 0 (0.0)/44 (65.7)/23 (34.3) 0 (0)/81 (73.6)/29 (26.4) 0.261 0.68 (0.35–1.32)
Duration of DM2 (≥15 years)a 0 (0.0)/58 (72.5)/22 (27.5) 0 (0)/76 (80.8)/18 (19.1) 0.192 0.62 (0.31–1.27)
Dyslipidemiaa 0 (0.0)/56 (77.8)/16 (22.2) 0 (0.0)/69 (65.7)/36 (34.3) 0.084 1.83 (0.92–3.63)
Cardiovascular diseasea 0 (0.0)/52 (80.0)/13 (20.0) 0 (0.0)/73 (65.2)/39 (34.8) 0.037 2.14 (1.04–4.40)
Hypertensiona 0 (0.0)/75 (72.8)/28 (27.2) 0 (0.0)/64 (73.6)/10 (26.4) 0.029 2.39 (1.08–5.29)
DM2a 0 (0.0)/95 (73.1)/35 (26.9) 0 (0.0)/30 (63.8)/17 (36.2) 0.234 1.54 (0.76–3.13)
B, NdeI (risk allele, T; no-risk allele, C)
Frequency of TT/TC/CC genotypes, n (%)
Variable DR patients No-DR patients P-valuec OR (95% CI)
Cataract 0 (0.0)/62 (92.5)/5 (7.5) 0 (0.0)/106 (96.4)/4 (3.6) 0.262 0.47 (0.12–1.81)
Duration of DM2 (≥15 years)b 0 (0.0)/74 (92.5)/6 (7.5) 0 (0.0)/89 (94.7)/5 (5.3) 0.560 0.69 (0.20–2.31)
Dyslipidemiaa 0 (0.0)/69 (95.8)/3 (4.2) 0 (0.0)/99 (94.3)/6 (5.7) 0.646 1.39 (0.34–5.76)
Cardiovascular diseasea 0 (0.0)/62 (95.4)/3 (4.6) 0 (0.0)/106 (94.6)/6 (5.4) 0.829 1.17 (0.28–4.84)
Hypertensiona 0 (0.0)/97 (94.1)/6 (5.8) 0 (0.0)/71 (95.9)/3 (4.0) 0.596 0.68 (0.17–2.82)
DM2a 0 (0.0)/124 (95.4)/6 (4.6) 0 (0.0)/44 (93.6)/3 (6.4) 0.637 1.41 (0.34–5.88)

Family history data

missing data

correlation/trend P-value. DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.