ETM Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 1792-0981 1792-1015 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/etm.2015.2844 ETM-0-0-2844 Articles Laryngeal mask airway without muscle relaxant in femoral head replacement in elderly patients KONGMING * LIBEIPING * TIANYUNPING Department of Anesthesiology, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221002, P.R. China Correspondence to: Yunping Tian, Department of Anesthesiology, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, 19 Zhongshanbei Road, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221002, P.R. China, E-mail: typing326@163.com

Contributed equally

 01 2016 09 11 2015 11 1 65 68 21082015 05112015 Copyright: © Kong et al. 2015 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The number of elderly patients undergoing femoral head replacement surgeries is on the increase. These patients often suffer from comorbidity such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, which limits the ability of medical teams to employ anesthesia. Thus, alternative methods are required. The aim of this study was to examine the advantage of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the absence of muscle relaxant in elderly patients undergoing femoral head replacement operations. Fifty patients (27 males and 23 females) undergoing femoral head replacements were selected for the study between March 2013 and May 2014. The mean value for the age in this group was 74.6±12.5 years. The patients were randomly distributed into two groups of 25. One group was designated as the treatment group and the second group as the control group. For the treatment group, LMA without muscle relaxant was used, and the control group received routine anesthesia. Variations in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and oxygen saturation (SPO2) in the two groups were monitored at different times. Clinical efficacy and muscle relaxation effects were also analyzed. For the treatment group, the HR, MAP and SPO2 measurements did not reveal any significant variation while these values in the control group demonstrated important dissimilarities. Time to recovery, time to extubation and incidence of throat pain in the treatment group were all markedly decreased as compared to those in control group. The operation time in the treatment group was not significantly different to that of control group. The satisfaction of the muscle relaxation effect in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group while the incidence of adverse reactions was not considerably different. In conclusion, the use of LMA without using muscle relaxant in femoral head replacement surgeries performed on elderly patients showed to be effective and safe.

 laryngeal mask airway no-muscle-relaxant technology femoral head replacement elderly patients Introduction

The number of elderly patients undergoing femoral head replacement surgeries is on the increase. These patients often suffer from comorbidity such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, which limits the ability of medical teams to utilize anesthesia (1). Inappropriate anesthesia is the main source of severe damage and comorbidity in 12.3% of cases undergoing femoral head replacement surgeries (2).

The introduction of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) by Brain (3) replaced the mask and endotracheal intubation and changed the traditional concept of airway management. At present, a 30–60% laryngeal mask is applied in general anesthesia. However, the application rate at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Hongkong, China) was identified as ~20% (4). LMA is considered convenient due to its easier airway maintenance, less gas leakage, and less pollution of the operating room. For patients undergoing a short-duration operation, LMA can replace the bag-mask device (5,6). Clinical anesthesia induction is often performed under the premise of muscle relaxation, and muscle relaxation is primarily used to reduce the tracheal intubation response and muscle tension during general anesthesia, in order to provide suitable conditions for the operation. However, for patients with myasthenia gravis, obesity, sleep apnea syndrome and other complications, the use of a muscle relaxation agent is a debatable point (7,8). At the same time, the use of muscle relaxation for minor surgery may affect the patient's recovery and delay the patient's respiratory recovery time (9). Laryngeal mask without muscle relaxant has been used in tumor removal, with a favourable outcome (10). In the present study, 50 cases of senile patients with femoral head replacement surgery were treated with LMA without muscle relaxant, resulting in a satisfactory effect outcome.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>General information

Fifty patients (27 males and 23 females) undergoing femoral head replacements were selected for the study between March 2013 and May 2014.

The patients were randomly distributed into two groups of 25. One group was designated as the treatment group and the second group served as the control group. Fifteen male and 10 female patients with an age range of 60–89 years (74.3±15.2 years) were placed in the treatment group. The mean value for the weight in this group was 53.6±11.3 kg. The control group comprised 12 males and 13 females with an age range of 61–88 years (75.4±12.6 years). The mean value for the weight in this group was 52.8±10.7 kg. Gender, age and weight of the patients did not significantly affected the results (P>0.05).

Inclusion criteria for the study required that each patient undergo examinations prior to surgery and had no anesthesia contraindication in the vertebral canal. Any patients with comorbidity received medical therapy to meet surgical requirements. Liver and renal functions as well as the coagulation function were measured after recovery.

Exclusion criteria for the current study were: i) Presence of any form of allergy to anesthetics; ii) existence of any type of endocrine disorders; iii) existence of any severe anemia prior to surgery including blood transfusion or blood loss of >500 ml.

Thirty minutes prior to anesthesia, each patient received 1 mg of penehyclidine hydrochloride intravenously. A hemodynamic monitor (Mindray, Shenzhen, China) was used to monitor the electrocardiogram, oxygen saturation (SPO2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg), propofol (2 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) were used for the treatment group. Opler no. 4 LMA (Vitaltec, Taichung, Taiwan) was inserted following completion of anesthesia. In those cases where the insertion failed twice, LMA was replaced with a tracheal catheter, and the patients were excluded from the treatment group. Criteria established for LMA positioning were: i) bilateral breath sound was required to be similar to that of prior to surgery with no succussion splash into the stomach; ii) peak end tidal CO2 level (PETCO2) was required to be normal; iii) fiberoptic bronchoscopy test was performed.

For the control group, atracurium (2 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg) and propofol (0.6 mg/kg) were prepared. Subsequently, a tracheal catheter (diameter 7.0 mm) was intubated and sufentanil (0.1 µg/kg/h) and propofol (4–8 mg/kg/h) were administered by continuous intravenous infusion, while atracurium was administered by intermittent intravenous infusion. Patients in the treatment and control groups were subjected to mechanical ventilation. Following completion of the surgeries the patients were subjected to a head lift of >5 sec and breathing for 5 min (SPO2≥95%) in order to regain consciousness. After extubation (withdrawal of LMA) or removal of the tracheal catheter, the patients were returned to the ward.

 Monitoring measurements

Values for MAP, heart rate (HR) and SPO2 were recorded at different times: i) prior to anesthesia (T0), ii) immediately after intubation or indwelling of LMA (T1), iii) 10 min after intubation (T2), and iv) immediately after extubation or withdrawal of LMA (T3). Time to recovery, time to extubation, and frequency of postoperative throat pain were also recorded. Muscle relaxation was compared in patients in the two groups.

 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 software. Categorical data were presented by numbers and percentages, and tested using the χ2 test. Quantitative data were presented by means ± SD. Inter-group differences were analyzed using the t-test, and analysis of variance was performed between the groups. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant result.

 Results <sec> <title>MAP, HR and SPO<sub>2</sub> measurements at different times

The results of the monitoring of MAP, HR and SPO2 in the treatment and control groups prior to surgery did not demonstrate any significant difference (P>0.05). The results of monitoring MAP, HR and SPO2 indicated that routine anesthesia used for patients in the control group was potentially the source of the instability observed in MAP, HR and SPO2. MAP, HR and SPO2 values in the control group observed at different times were significantly different (HR, F=2.301, P=0.042; MAP, F=2.643, P=0.036; SP02, F=1.955, P=0.044). By contrast, the MAP, HR and SPO2 values for the patients in the treatment group were not significantly different (P>0.05). This result suggested that LMA without muscle relaxant in the treatment group resulted in a stable MAP, HR and SPO2 (Table I).

 Clinical efficacy

Time to recovery, time to extubation and occurrence of throat pain in the treatment group were significantly less than those observed in the control group (P<0.05). The operation time for the treatment group was not significantly different compared to the control group (P>0.05) (Table II).

 Muscle relaxation effect, adjuvant medications and incidence of adverse reaction

The muscle relaxation effect, adjuvant medications and incidence of adverse reaction for the treatment group were significantly higher than those observed in the control group (χ2=3.231, P=0.022). Three patients in the treatment group (12.00%) received a combination of innovar and midazolam due to poor anesthesia, which was markedly lower than the number of patients in the control group that required the same intervention. In the control group, 11 patients (44.00%) received a combination of innovar and midazolam, which was significantly higher than the values observed in the treatment group (χ2=2.424, P=0.035). No patient in either group suffered from severe comorbidity such as arrhythmia at the time of operation. While 3 patients in the treatment group (12.00%) and 4 patients in the control group (16.00%) suffered from nausea and vomiting, the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups was not statistically different (P>0.05) (Table III).

 Discussion

Femoral neck fractures are common in the elderly. The majority of patients undergoing femoral head replacements are at risk for respiratory and circulatory comorbidity and massive hemorrhage (10). The elderly patients are often in the risk group for multi-system disorders and anesthesia complications due to age-associated reduced physiological functions (6). The surgical risk in these patients is also increased due to poor vascular compensation as well as qualitative and quantitative details of intraoperative medications (5). Consequently, methods of anesthesia should be selected diligently for these patients. The use of LMA without muscle relaxant can be considered as an ideal method of anesthesia in femoral head replacement surgeries for elderly patients. This method offers a good balance between the efficiency and the safety. In addition, use of this method can reduce the intraoperative instability of blood pressure and HR (6–8). SLIPA LMA is an advanced supraglottic ventilation device similar to human pharyngeal anatomical structure. The absence of air charge cell in SLIPA LMA can prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries caused by the dilatation of the upper esophagus (2,11). This anesthetic procedure is convenient in clinic and has a relatively high success rate. Intubation of trachea cannula is often complicated and the indwelling of laryngoscope may irritate the glottis and trachea, and can result in hemodynamic changes (6,12). In this study, all the patients successfully completed the indwelling and we demonstrated that stable HR, MAP and SPO2 can be obtained using LMA without muscle relaxant.

No significant differences were identified in the HR, MAP and SPO2 values at different times in patients in the treatment group. This finding was associated with the fact that laryngoscope was not directly indwelled in LMA. Thus, the vocal cord and tracheal mucosa were not affected, and the sympathetic nerve was not excessively stimulated (13,14). Furthermore, compared with the results of earlier studies, the time to recovery and time to extubation were decreased for the patients in the treatment group compared to those in the control group (15). The incidences of throat pain for patients in the treatment group were inferior to those of the control group, which was consistent with previously reported studies (16). These results may be attributed to the fact that indwelling of SLIPA LMA requires no air inflation and may not produce overcompression to the throat cavity wall (4,17). Although SLIPA LMA required no air inflation, it contained a 50-ml cavity for secretion in order to prevent error aspiration (18,19). Of note, the use of SLIPA LMA in patients with full or residual stomach contents should be considered prudently (20).

In conclusion, the method of using the SLIPA LMA without muscle relaxant in femoral head replacement surgeries is a superior method that offers stable hemodynamics, postoperative consciousness, early extubation and less throat pain in elderly patients.

 References FleisherLAGeriatric anesthesia: can we achieve the goal of returning our elderly to the baseline or improved function?Anesthesiol Clin33xiiixiv201510.1016/j.anclin.2015.06.00226315641 OdaYTanakaKMatsuuraTHaseINishikawaKAsadaANitrous oxide induces paradoxical electroencephalographic changes after tracheal intubation during isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesiaAnesth Analg10210941102200610.1213/01.ane.0000198509.55543.d616551905 BrainAIThree cases of difficult intubation to overcome by the laryngeal mask airwayAnesthesia40353355198510.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10788.x El-DawlatlyAAAnesthesia for thoracoscopic thymectomy: Modified non-muscle relaxant technique-case reportsMiddle East J Anaesthesiol19219224200717511196 BagshawOA combination of total intravenous anesthesia and thoracic epidural for thymectomy in juvenile myasthenia gravisPaediatr Anaesth17370374200710.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02122.x17359407 Al-MazrouKAAbdullahKMElGammalMSAnsariRATurkistaniAAbdelmeguidMELaryngeal mask airway vs. uncuffed endotracheal tube for nasal and paranasal sinus surgery: Paediatric airway protectionEur J Anaesthesiol271619201010.1097/EJA.0b013e32832c5f0919444123 MillerDMA proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: A brief reviewAnesth Analg9915531559200410.1213/01.ANE.0000134798.00069.2B15502064 MillerDMCamporotaLAdvantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopiesCan J Anaesth53188193200610.1007/BF0302182616434761 LedowskiTMuscle relaxation in laparoscopic surgery: what is the evidence for improved operating conditions and patient outcome? A brief review of the literatureSurg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech25281285201510.1097/SLE.000000000000016426121545 KimYHKimJSParkJWJooJHTotal hip replacement with a short metaphyseal-fitting anatomical cementless femoral component in patients aged 70 years or olderJ Bone Joint Surg Br93587592201110.1302/0301-620X.93B5.2599421511922 HooshangiHWongDTBrief review: the Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLA and the Streamlined Liner of Pharyngeal Airway (SLIPA) supraglottic airwaysCan J Anaesth55177185200810.1007/BF0301609318310629 PokeeNWiwanitkitVThiopentone sodium and propofol for facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertionAnn Afr Med14160161201526021400 GopinathMVRavishankarMNagKKumarVHVelrajJParthasarathySEstimation of effect-site concentration of propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion using fentanyl or morphine as adjuvantIndian J Anaesth59295299201510.4103/0019-5049.15687426019354 NisiFGalzeranoACicchittoGPumaFPedutoVAImproving patient safety after rigid bronchoscopy in adults: Laryngeal mask airway versus face mask - a pilot studyMed Devices (Auckl)8201206201510.2147/MDER.S7799525995652 CookTMKellyFETime to abandon the ‘vintage’ laryngeal mask airway and adopt second-generation supraglottic airway devices as first choiceBr J Anaesth141361372015 TanoubiISunJNDroletPFortierLPDonatiFReplacing a double-lumen tube with a single-lumen tube or a laryngeal mask airway device to reduce coughing at emergence after thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled single-blind trialCan J Anaesth62988995201510.1007/s12630-015-0403-225985845 BaftiuNHadriBMorinaMMustafaAAnesthesia for trans-sternal thymectomy: Modified non-muscle relaxant techniqueMed Arh65317318201110.5455/medarh.2011.65.317-31822073861 TortosaJAHérnández-PalazónJAnaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in myasthenia gravis: A non-muscle relaxant techniqueAnaesthesia5280780819979291787 ChanMTNgSKLowJMA non-muscle-relaxant technique for video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in myasthenia gravisAnaesth Intensive Care2325625719957793612 el-DawlatlyAAAshourMHAnaesthesia for thymectomy in myasthenia gravis: A non-muscle-relaxant techniqueAnaesth Intensive Care2245846019947978212

MAP, HR and SPO2 at different times in the treatment and control groups.

HR (beat/min) MAP (mmHg) SPO2 (%)
Time Control Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment
T0 81.48±10.95 80.37±10.41 79.81±9.87 80.65±8.64 98.67±1.69 97.23±1.95
T1 73.32±11.56 74.58±13.61 72.41±10.17 73.37±12.89 95.01±0.82 98.00±0.94
T2 72.71±10.46 73.56±12.03 70.56±10.29 73.41±10.41 94.01±0.76 97.00±0.55
T3 70.08±12.18 73.48±13.52 68.55±11.97 72.52±14.02 94.19±1.26 96.52±1.73

HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SPO2, oxygen saturation.

Clinical efficacy in the treatment vs. control group.

Group No. Time to recovery (min) Time to extubation (min) Operation time (min) Throat pain [number (%)]
Treatment 25 35.67±16.44 7.38±2.17 123.45±46.67 2 (8.00)
Control 25 45.87±20.31 11.53±3.74 119.72±36.69 9 (36.00)
T (χ2) 2.854 3.014 0.947 3.947
P-value 0.031 0.026 0.686 <0.001

Muscle relaxation effect and adjuvant medications in the treatment and control groups.

Muscle relaxation effect Adjuvant medications
Group Number Satisfactory (n/%) Good Poor Innovar Midazolam
Treatment 25 21 (84.00) 3 (12.00) 1 (4.00) 2 1
Control 25 14 (56.00) 8 (32.00) 3 (12.00) 5 6