<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-0981</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1015</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2016.3008</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ETM-0-0-3008</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Early application of negative pressure wound therapy to acute wounds contaminated with <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>: An effective approach to preventing biofilm formation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>LI</surname><given-names>TONGTONG</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ZHANG</surname><given-names>LIHAI</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>HAN</surname><given-names>LI</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af3-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>WANG</surname><given-names>GUOQI</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>YIN</surname><given-names>PENG</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>LI</surname><given-names>ZHIRUI</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>ZHANG</surname><given-names>LICHENG</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>GUO</surname><given-names>QI</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>LIU</surname><given-names>DAOHONG</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af4-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>TANG</surname><given-names>PEIFU</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="c1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-etm-0-0-3008"><label>1</label>Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af2-etm-0-0-3008"><label>2</label>Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af3-etm-0-0-3008"><label>3</label>Center for Hospital Infection Control, Chinese PLA Institute for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100071, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af4-etm-0-0-3008"><label>4</label>Department of Orthopedics, The 309<sup>th</sup> Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100091, P.R. China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-etm-0-0-3008"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Dr Peifu Tang, Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, P.R. China, E-mail: <email>tangpeifu301@sina.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>03</month>
<year>2016</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2016</year></pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>769</fpage>
<lpage>776</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Li et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been demonstrated to be effective at preventing biofilm-associated infections; however, its role in biofilm prevention is unknown. The present study evaluated the effect of NPWT on biofilm prevention when rapidly initiated following wound contamination. Full-thickness dermal wounds (8 mm) were created in rabbit ears and inoculated with green fluorescent protein-labeled <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (<italic>S. aureus</italic>). At 6 h following inoculation, continuous NPWT at &#x2212;125 mmHg was initiated, with the wounds on the contralateral ear left untreated in order to serve as self-controls. <italic>S. aureus</italic> rapidly formed mature biofilms in the wound beds post-inoculation, with a persistent bacterial burden of ~10<sup>5</sup>&#x2212;10<sup>7</sup> colony-forming units (CFUs)/wound and impaired wound healing. Compared with the untreated group, NPWT resulted in a significant reduction in biofilm matrix, which was verified by scanning electron microscopy and epifluorescence. A reduction in bacterial counts followed (P&#x003C;0.05) with ~10<sup>3</sup> CFUs/wound on postoperative day 13 and improvement in all healing parameters (P&#x003C;0.05) relative to control wounds. The results of the present investigation suggest that NPWT is an effective strategy to impeding the formation of <italic>S. aureus</italic> wound biofilms when initiated rapidly following bacterial contamination. The early application of NPWT, aimed at biofilm prevention, may improve wound care.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>acute wound</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial contamination</kwd>
<kwd>negative pressure wound therapy</kwd>
<kwd>early application</kwd>
<kwd>biofilm prevention</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Bacterial biofilms have long been considered to be one of the most difficult problems in the field of wound care (<xref rid="b1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b8-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). Defined as complex microbial communities irreversibly attached to the wound surface and embedded in self-secreted extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), biofilms provide bacteria with an effective barrier against host immune cells and antimicrobial agents (<xref rid="b6-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). As the most common pathogen of wound infection, <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (<italic>S. aureus</italic>) has been widely studied by researchers (<xref rid="b10-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). The EPS of staphylococcal biofilms are primarily composed of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), extracellular DNA (eDNA), protein and cellular debris (<xref rid="b13-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b14-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). In particular, PIA and eDNA are the main components of the extracellular matrix of biofilms, and their roles in intercellular adhesion and biofilm formation have been investigated by numerous studies (<xref rid="b14-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b20-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>). Furthermore, the compromised open wounds create an ideal microenvironment for bacterial colonization and biofilm development (<xref rid="b6-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). A series of <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> studies have revealed that wound-associated biofilms grow rapidly and mature within 24 h post-infection (<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b21-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b23-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>). Once bacteria form a mature biofilm they are difficult to eradicate (<xref rid="b8-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). Despite traditional therapies such as serial debridement and lavage that can remove the majority of mature biofilms and necrotic tissue, residual bacteria may rapidly reestablish a robust biofilm architecture, causing pain to the patients during the process (<xref rid="b24-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>,<xref rid="b25-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). The ultimate consequence is a delay in wound healing and reepithelialization (<xref rid="b8-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b26-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b28-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>).</p>
<p>The durability of a mature biofilm highlights the importance of preventing biofilm formation at the early stages of wound infection. Although specialized dressings for wound care do have an inhibitory effect on biofilms, the efficacy varies greatly with the type, concentration and release of active compound (<xref rid="b29-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). Antibiofilm agents, such as dispersin B and DNase I, have been demonstrated to be effective in the degradation of biofilm matrix both <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic>, although these are lacking in clinical application and standard treatment regimens (<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b30-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). In addition, numerous small molecules targeting bacterial signaling pathways, such as autoinducing peptide, have demonstrated antibiofilm biological activities, although the clinical efficacy and safety of these compounds has not been sufficiently evaluated (<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b26-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>,<xref rid="b31-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). Despite considerable research, a significant improvement in biofilm prevention in the clinical setting remains lacking.</p>
<p>Physical therapies have emerged in biofilm management due to their satisfactory efficacy and low risk for microbial resistance (<xref rid="b32-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). In particular, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve the healing process of infected wounds and to avoid biofilm-associated infections when applied as early as possible (<xref rid="b33-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). Previous studies have attributed these benefits to the secondary effects of NPWT, including fluid removal, modulation of inflammation, and the stimulation of wound healing signaling pathways (<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b41-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>). However, investigations into the role of NPWT in biofilm formation remain limited. Despite individual studies suggesting its compression effect on established mature biofilms <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref rid="b42-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b44-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>), the efficacy of NPWT on biofilm prevention remains unclear, particularly <italic>in vivo</italic>.</p>
<p>The aim of the present study was to evaluate and validate the potential effect of NPWT on biofilm prevention when initiated rapidly following wound contamination. Subsequent changes in bacterial burden and wound healing secondary to NPWT were also investigated. The results may provide a better understanding of the therapeutic regimen required for wound care.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Ethical statement</title>
<p>All animal experiments in the present study were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) in compliance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Animals in Research (<xref rid="b45-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">45</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Animals</title>
<p>A total of 18 adult female Japanese large-ear white rabbits (age, 3&#x2013;6 months; weight, ~3 kg; purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China) were used for this study. The rabbits were acclimated to standard housing and fed <italic>ad libitum</italic> under constant temperature (22&#x00B0;C) and humidity (45&#x0025;) with a 12-h light/dark cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Bacterial strains and culture</title>
<p><italic>S. aureus</italic> strain RN6390 constitutively expressing green fluorescent protein (obtained the from Chinese PLA Institute for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China) was utilized for wound inoculation. <italic>S. aureus</italic> was grown overnight and subcultured in Luria-Bertani broth (AOBOX Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) at 37&#x00B0;C until log phase. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4&#x00B0;C (5,000 &#x00D7; g), and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The final bacterial resuspension was diluted with PBS to an optical density of 1.0 at 600 nm equivalent to 10<sup>5</sup> colony-forming units (CFUs)/&#x00B5;l empirically (<xref rid="b11-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Wound protocol and bacterial inoculation</title>
<p>The wounding and bacterial inoculation protocol was based on the previously published wound model with minor modifications (<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). Briefly, rabbits were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of a ketamine (45 mg/kg; Gutian Pharma Co., Ltd., Fujian, China) and xylazine (5 mg/kg; Huamu Animal Health Product Co., Ltd., Jilin, China) mixture. Ears were shaved and sterilized twice with 70&#x0025; ethanol. Following local anesthesia with 1&#x0025; lidocaine (Yimin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Beijing, China), six standardized 8 mm diameter full-thickness dermal wounds were created by an experienced surgeon on each ventral ear down to the perichondrium using a scalpel. Following hemostasis, the wounds were dressed with semiocclusive IV3000 Transparent Adhesive Film Dressing (Smith &#x0026; Nephew Healthcare Ltd., Hull, UK). On postoperative day (POD) 3, each wound was inoculated with 1&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup> CFUs of <italic>S. aureus</italic> at a volume of 10 &#x00B5;l. Planktonic bacteria were allowed to proliferate <italic>in vivo</italic> under the semiocclusive transparent film for a minimum of 6 h to ensure bacterial adhesion and colonization (<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b41-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>,<xref rid="b46-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">46</xref>,<xref rid="b47-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">47</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Study design and treatment protocol</title>
<p>All rabbit ears were used to create acute <italic>S. aureus</italic>-contaminated wounds (6 wounds/ear; 36 ears). For each animal, the two ears were respectively and randomly assigned to the &#x2018;untreated control group&#x2019; and the &#x2018;NPWT group&#x2019; (18 ears/group), with the 6 wounds on each ear following the same protocol (<xref rid="b32-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>).</p>
<p>The wounds were treated under the previously published protocol with minor modifications (<xref rid="b48-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">48</xref>). Briefly, 6 h postinoculation on POD 3, the wounds were dressed with a standard NPWT dressing (consisting of polyvinyl alcohol foam, semiocclusive transparent dressing and suction tube; Wuhan VSD Medical Science &#x0026; Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) trimmed in advance to the appropriate size. The suction tube was then connected to a vacuum pump device (provided by Professor Lei Hu, Beihang University, Beijing, China). Wounds treated with NPWT were subjected to continuous negative pressure at &#x2212;125 mmHg throughout the study (<xref rid="b41-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>,<xref rid="b47-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">47</xref>). Dressings were checked daily and changed on PODs 4, 6, 8 and 10, as recommended for infected wounds by the manufacturer. Animals were sacrificed via an overdose of intravenous pentobarbital sodium (100&#x2013;240 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) on PODs 4 (n=8), 6 (n=2), 8 (n=2), 10 (n=2) and 13 (n=4). Wounds were harvested using an 8-mm dermal biopsy punch (Miltex, Inc., York, PA, USA) for PIA, eDNA, viable bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, or a scalpel for epifluorescence and histological analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Detection of PIA and eDNA in wound biofilms</title>
<p>The dorsal side of the wound was removed to eliminate the interference of non-specific bacteria outside of the wound surface (<xref rid="b32-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). The tissue samples were placed in centrifuge tubes with 1 ml PBS, and sonicated for 2 min to remove bacterial biofilms from the tissue (<xref rid="b32-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>,<xref rid="b49-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">49</xref>). The insoluble material was discarded by centrifugation at 4&#x00B0;C (13,400 &#x00D7; g). In total, 0.5 ml supernatant was used for the measurement of PIA, and the remainder was used for eDNA extraction. An improved Elson-Morgan assay was performed subsequently to measure the levels of PIA (<xref rid="b13-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b19-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b20-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b50-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">50</xref>). Briefly, 0.5 ml supernatant was supplemented with 0.1 ml potassium tetraborate (0.8 mol/l; Vetec; Sigma-Aldrich) in a test tube. Tubes were heated in a boiling water bath for 3 min and were subsequently cooled using tap water. A total of 3 ml Ehrlich&#x0027;s reagent (Vetec; Sigma-Aldrich) was added and, immediately after mixing, the tubes were placed in a water bath at 37&#x00B0;C for 20 min. The reaction was terminated by cooling the tubes with tap water. The results were expressed as the absorbance of the final reaction solution at 585 nm as determined using a spectrophotometer (GeneQuant 1300; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) (<xref rid="b50-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">50</xref>).</p>
<p>The remaining supernatant was used for the extraction of eDNA using the TIANamp Micro DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer&#x0027;s protocol. The eDNA levels/wound were expressed as the DNA concentration, quantified using a Qubit&#x00AE; 2.0 fluorometer with a Qubit&#x00AE; dsDNA BR Assay kit (both Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x0027;s protocol (<xref rid="b30-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>SEM</title>
<p>Following 2.5&#x0025; glutaraldehyde and 1&#x0025; osmium tetroxide fixation, the tissue samples were dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol (30, 50, 70, 80, 90 and 100&#x0025;) and dried with a critical point dryer (HCP-2; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) by flooding with liquid carbon dioxide at 5&#x00B0;C for 20 min and raising the temperature to the critical point (~35&#x00B0;C). Subsequently, samples were mounted using double-sided tape and coated with gold in an auto sputter coater (E-1010; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Imaging of the tissue samples was performed by SEM (S-3400N; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operated at the scanning voltage of 15 kV.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fluorescent staining and fluorescence light microscopy</title>
<p>The wounds were bisected at the largest diameter and embedded in optimal cutting temperature (O.C.T.) Compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA), snap-frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen until cryosectioning. Tissue sections (6 &#x00B5;m) were obtained with a Leica CM1950 freezing microtome (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Visualization of biofilm matrix was accomplished by staining with Concanavalin A Texas Red&#x00AE; Conjugate (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), specific for <italic>S. aureus</italic> exopolysaccharides, for 15 min in the dark at room temperature (<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). The tissue sections were then rinsed three times in PBS and incubated with 4&#x2032;,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dilactate (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 5 min to visualize the host cells. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Viable bacterial count measurements</title>
<p>Wounds were pretreated as described in the protocol of PIA measurement. Tissue specimens were homogenized into 1 ml suspension with sterile PBS, followed by sonication for 2 min to disrupt bacterial aggregates in the biofilm. Subsequently, the homogenates were serially diluted with sterile PBS (ranging from 10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 10<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, 10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> to 10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup> times the concentration of the homogenates), plated on <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> Isolation Agar (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) and incubated at 37&#x00B0;C for 24 h. A standard colony-counting method was conducted and the results were expressed as the logarithm of CFUs/wound (<xref rid="b12-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b41-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurement of wound closure</title>
<p>From POD 0 (the day of wounding), images of the wounds were captured with a digital camera (IXUSi; Canon, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) on each day of dressing change. Wound size was then determined by quantifying the wound area using Image-Pro Plus version 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The rate of wound closure was expressed as a percentage of the initial wound area (<xref rid="b51-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">51</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Histological analysis</title>
<p>Wounds were bisected at the maximum diameter and fixed in 10&#x0025; neutral formalin (Yili Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The tissue samples were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 5-&#x00B5;m sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The observation of the tissue sections was performed with an Olympus MVX10 macro-microscope (Olympus Corporation). Images of the stained wounds were captured and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software, version 6.0. The morphometric parameters included the epithelial and granulation gaps (the distance between the leading edges of newly formed epithelial or granulation tissue) and the epithelial or granulation area (the sum of the area of newly formed epithelial or granulation tissue on the two sides of the wound bed) (<xref rid="b28-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>). The measurements were carried out by two independent observers who were blinded to the treatment, and an average result was calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data are reported in graphical form as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation. Student&#x0027;s t-test (two-tailed and paired) was used to compare the PIA/eDNA content, viable bacterial counts and histological parameters between NPWT-treated wounds and their untreated control. Wound closure was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, followed by the least significant difference post-hoc test to evaluate the statistical difference between groups at each time point. All analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) at a significance level of &#x03B1;=0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>NPWT reduces PIA and eDNA levels and inhibits the production of extracellular matrix</title>
<p>With the previously established rabbit ear wound model, <italic>S. aureus</italic>-contaminated wounds were treated with or without NPWT from 6 h postinoculation. For the main components of <italic>S. aureus</italic> biofilm, namely PIA and eDNA, NPWT resulted in a significant reduction in their levels in the wound beds (PIA, P&#x003C;0.05; eDNA, P&#x003C;0.01) (<xref rid="f1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). This reduction could be visualized through SEM (<xref rid="f2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). The untreated wounds manifested a relatively intact biofilm structure (<xref rid="f2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2A</xref>) with large amounts of cocci-shaped <italic>S. aureus</italic> embedded within the lattice-like extracellular matrix (arrows, <xref rid="f2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2B</xref>). Conversely, wounds treaded with NPWT showed comparable amounts of bacteria but a lack of extracellular matrix (<xref rid="f2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2C</xref>), which was more visible at a higher magnification (<xref rid="f2-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2D</xref>). To verify the results, epifluorescence microscopy was performed, showing a mature biofilm with large amounts of exopolysaccharide matrix surrounding the bacteria in untreated wounds (<xref rid="f3-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>). By comparison, bacteria in the NPWT group spread over the wound beds with sparse exopolysaccharide matrix (<xref rid="f3-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3B</xref>). An uncolonized area of the wound tissue showed background staining of Concanavalin A, and served as a negative control (<xref rid="f3-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3C</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Prolonged NPWT reduces bacterial load</title>
<p>Viable bacterial counts were measured over time to investigate the effect of early application of NPWT on bacterial burden (<xref rid="f4-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>). On POD 4 and 6, the bacterial load in the wounds treated with NPWT was not significantly different from that in the untreated controls with ~10<sup>7</sup> CFUs/wound. However, from POD 8 there was a significant decline of the bacterial load in the NPWT group (POD 8, P&#x003C;0.05; POD 10, P&#x003C;0.01). At the end of the study (POD 13), NPWT resulted in a significant reduction in the bacterial count by two-log fold compared with the untreated wounds (P&#x003C;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>NPWT enhances wound healing</title>
<p>The reduction in bacterial burden secondary to NPWT correlated with a synchronous enhancement in wound healing. Gross appearance on POD 13 manifested a marked difference between the two groups. Compared with the film-like exudates overlying the untreated wounds (<xref rid="f5-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5A</xref>), NPWT accelerated wound closure and epithelialization, with clean granulation tissue beds (<xref rid="f5-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5B</xref>). The rate of wound closure in the NPWT group was significantly higher compared with that of the untreated group (<xref rid="f5-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5C</xref>). Images of histological tissue sections showed increased amounts of new epithelial and granulation tissue in NPWT-treated wounds (<xref rid="f6-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6B</xref>) compared with untreated controls (<xref rid="f6-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6A</xref>). Trends in wound healing were quantified by measuring the epithelial and granulation gaps and areas. NPWT led to a significant reduction in epithelial and granulation gaps (P&#x003C;0.001) and increase in new epithelial (P&#x003C;0.01) and granulation (P&#x003C;0.001) areas compared with the untreated wounds (<xref rid="f6-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6C and D</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Bacterial biofilm remains a challenging issue in the field of wound care (<xref rid="b1-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b8-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). Although there is a greater understanding of the necessity of biofilm prevention, the therapeutic strategies to prevent biofilm formation are limited in clinical practice (<xref rid="b8-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b24-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b31-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). In an effort to seek safe and effective wound care modalities, early application of NPWT has been widely acknowledged for its considerable efficacy and low incidence of biofilm-associated infections (<xref rid="b32-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). However, despite an increasing number of studies investigating this type of therapy, the potential role of NPWT in biofilm prevention has yet to be elucidated (<xref rid="b37-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b44-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>). The present study examined and evaluated the effect of NPWT on biofilm prevention when initiated rapidly following wound contamination.</p>
<p>The results indicated that the early application of NPWT may be an effective approach for the prevention of biofilm formation in <italic>S. aureus</italic>-contaminated wounds. Although the exact mechanism underlying the effects of NPWT has yet to be established, a possible explanation for the benefits observed following treatment with NPWT may be the lack of biofilm matrix. As the structural components of staphylococcal biofilms, PIA and extracellular DNA have an important role in bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation (<xref rid="b15-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b18-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). Scavenging these matrix components or inhibiting their biosynthesis can effectively prevent biofilm formation and development (<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of NPWT in fluid removal and wound cleaning due to the continuous suction (<xref rid="b39-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>). The continuous suction may also clear PIA and eDNA from the contaminated wounds before these components are able to form extensive intermolecular crosslinks around the bacteria. In addition, due to the physical effect of negative pressure, NPWT leads to an essentially different microenvironment for wound healing, characterized by hypoxia and microstress (<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). These environmental factors, which may stimulate host gene expression and cell proliferation through a variety of signaling pathways (<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>,<xref rid="b40-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>), may also have an effect on the bacteria. Therefore, another possible mechanism is that the environmental factors secondary to NPWT inhibit the biosynthesis of bacterial biofilm components, such as PIA and eDNA. Therefore, the early application of NPWT may prevent biofilm formation in <italic>S. aureus</italic>-contaminated wound beds.</p>
<p>Without the protection of the biofilm matrix, the bacteria may be eliminated by host immune cells more effectively (<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>), as shown by viable bacterial counts. Notably, the reduction of the bacterial burden should not be attributed to physical suction, as the bacterial counts did not significantly decrease at the early stages of NPWT. The immune response is more likely to have a leading role in bacterial clearance, as previously demonstrated (<xref rid="b41-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>,<xref rid="b46-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">46</xref>). Subsequently, a reduction in biofilm matrix and bacterial burden secondary to NPWT may be beneficial to wound healing, since both of these factors are thought to inhibit the healing process (<xref rid="b26-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b28-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>). In addition, NPWT may also improve wound healing through its ability to stimulate host gene expression and cell proliferation (<xref rid="b38-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b40-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous studies have investigated the effect of topical negative pressure used with or without bactericide on established mature biofilms <italic>in vitro</italic>, and demonstrated the presence of several changes in biofilm morphometric parameters and a reduction in bacterial counts (<xref rid="b42-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b44-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>). However, a compression (perhaps fragmentation) effect on biofilm architecture alone was inferred from the results (<xref rid="b42-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>,<xref rid="b44-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>). There was no evidence that NPWT was able to remove an established mature biofilm. Unlike these previous studies, the present investigation predominantly focused on the initial stages of wound infection, and examined the efficacy of NPWT on biofilm formation and development. For clinicians and researchers, processes that impede biofilm formation at the initial stage have long been regarded as a promising approach to prevent biofilm-associated infections and chronic infections (<xref rid="b25-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>,<xref rid="b37-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>). Bacteria without the protection of a biofilm matrix are more susceptible to immune cells and antimicrobial treatment (<xref rid="b9-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b25-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). The results of the present study suggested that the early use of NPWT rapidly following wound contamination may be more effective than delayed application in impeding biofilm formation. These results are concordant with those of previous studies that have demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy of NPWT on managing acute wounds with contamination when initiated early (<xref rid="b33-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b36-etm-0-0-3008" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). Although further investigations are required in order to clarify the role of biofilm matrix reduction in wound care, the present study provides a possible mechanism of action for this therapy.</p>
<p>Despite rigorous methods and significant results, there were limitations to the study. In particular, the effect of NPWT on <italic>S. aureus</italic> alone was investigated. As the majority of clinical cases are mixed infections, the investigation of other bacterial species is required during further studies to validate the results discussed herein. In addition, compared with previous studies, NPWT was not combined with traditional therapies, such as bactericide or irrigation. Although biofilm formation and development were inhibited by NPWT alone, viable bacterial counts did not decrease until immune cells infiltrated the wounds. Combined treatment is may have the potential to enhance the elimination of bacteria.</p>
<p>In view of the fact that mature biofilms are difficult to eradicate, the demand for effective and practical measures to avoid biofilm-associated infections is rising in clinical settings. Early application of NPWT to wounds contaminated with <italic>S. aureus</italic> has shown a significant efficacy on biofilm prevention in the present study. With an increasing number of clinical trials to validate its role in wound infection management, NPWT appears to reduce the accumulation of biofilm matrix, providing more opportunities for host cells or antimicrobial treatments to eliminate the unprotected bacteria. A better understanding of the potential role of NPWT in wound management and biofilm prevention should contribute to innovations in the field of wound care.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The present study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81472112).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-etm-0-0-3008"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costerton</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenberg</surname><given-names>EP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>284</volume><fpage>1318</fpage><lpage>1322</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.284.5418.1318</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10334980</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-etm-0-0-3008"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall-Stoodley</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Costerton</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Stoodley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases</article-title><source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro821</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15040259</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-etm-0-0-3008"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parsek</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacterial biofilms: An emerging link to disease pathogenesis</article-title><source>Annu Rev Microbiol</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>677</fpage><lpage>701</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14527295</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-etm-0-0-3008"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Harding</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacteria and wound healing</article-title><source>Curr Opin Infect Dis</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15021046</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-etm-0-0-3008"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sen</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Gordillo</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Roy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kirsner</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Lambert</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hunt</surname><given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottrup</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurtner</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Longaker</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>763</fpage><lpage>771</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19903300</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-etm-0-0-3008"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindsay</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>von Holy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: What healthcare professionals should know</article-title><source>J Hosp Infect</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>313</fpage><lpage>325</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17046102</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-etm-0-0-3008"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>James</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Swogger</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolcott</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pulcini</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Secor</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sestrich</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Costerton</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilms in chronic wounds</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18086294</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-etm-0-0-3008"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bjarnsholt</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kirketerp-M&#x00F8;ller</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>P&#x00D8;</given-names></name><name><surname>Madsen</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name><name><surname>Phipps</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Krogfelt</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>H&#x00F8;iby</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Givskov</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Why chronic wounds will not heal: A novel hypothesis</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>2</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18211573</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-etm-0-0-3008"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boles</surname><given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Horswill</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Staphylococcal biofilm disassembly</article-title><source>Trends Microbiol</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>449</fpage><lpage>455</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2011.06.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21784640</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-etm-0-0-3008"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moet</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>RN</given-names></name><name><surname>Biedenbach</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stilwell</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Fritsche</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Contemporary causes of skin and soft tissue infections in North America, Latin America, and Europe: Report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998-2004)</article-title><source>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.05.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17059876</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-etm-0-0-3008"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seth</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Geringer</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Agnew</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Dumanian</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacteriophage therapy for <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilm-infected wounds: A new approach to chronic wound care</article-title><source>Plast Reconstr Surg</source><volume>131</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>234</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827e47cd</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23357984</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-etm-0-0-3008"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gurjala</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name><name><surname>Geringer</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Seth</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Smeltzer</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of a novel, highly quantitative in vivo model for the study of biofilm-impaired cutaneous wound healing</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>400</fpage><lpage>410</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00690.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21518094</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-etm-0-0-3008"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadovskaya</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinogradov</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Flahaut</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kogan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Jabbouri</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Extracellular carbohydrate-containing polymers of a model biofilm-producing strain, <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> RP62A</article-title><source>Infect Immun</source><volume>73</volume><fpage>3007</fpage><lpage>3017</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.73.5.3007-3017.2005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15845508</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-etm-0-0-3008"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otto</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Staphylococcal biofilms</article-title><source>Curr Top Microbiol Immunol</source><volume>322</volume><fpage>207</fpage><lpage>228</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18453278</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-etm-0-0-3008"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arciola</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Campoccia</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Speziale</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Montanaro</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Costerton</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilm formation in <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials</article-title><source>Biomaterials</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>5967</fpage><lpage>5982</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22695065</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-etm-0-0-3008"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bayles</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The biological role of death and lysis in biofilm development</article-title><source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>721</fpage><lpage>726</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1743</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17694072</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-etm-0-0-3008"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cramton</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerke</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schnell</surname><given-names>NF</given-names></name><name><surname>Nichols</surname><given-names>WW</given-names></name><name><surname>G&#x00F6;tz</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and is required for biofilm formation</article-title><source>Infect Immun</source><volume>67</volume><fpage>5427</fpage><lpage>5433</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10496925</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-etm-0-0-3008"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x0027;Gara</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>ica and beyond: Biofilm mechanisms and regulation in <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></article-title><source>FEMS Microbiol Lett</source><volume>270</volume><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>188</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00688.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17419768</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-etm-0-0-3008"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sulfhydryl compounds reduce <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> biofilm formation by inhibiting PIA biosynthesis</article-title><source>FEMS Microbiol Lett</source><volume>316</volume><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02190.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21204926</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-etm-0-0-3008"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadovskaya</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaignon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kogan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Chokr</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinogradov</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Jabbouri</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Carbohydrate-containing components of biofilms produced in vitro by some staphylococcal strains related to orthopaedic prosthesis infections</article-title><source>FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00068.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16706790</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-etm-0-0-3008"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaber</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Triffo</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Suh</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hastert</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Griswold</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Auer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamood</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name><name><surname>Rumbaugh</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title><italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> forms biofilms in acute infection independent of cell-to-cell signaling</article-title><source>Infect Immun</source><volume>75</volume><fpage>3715</fpage><lpage>3721</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.00586-07</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17562773</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-etm-0-0-3008"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison-Balestra</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cazzaniga</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Mertz</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A wound-isolated <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualized by light microscopy</article-title><source>Dermatol Surg</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>631</fpage><lpage>635</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29146.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12786708</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-etm-0-0-3008"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Akiyama</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Huh</surname><given-names>WK</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamasaki</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Oono</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwatsuki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Confocal laser scanning microscopic observation of glycocalyx production by <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> in mouse skin: Does <italic>S. aureus</italic> generally produce a biofilm on damaged skin?</article-title><source>Br J Dermatol</source><volume>147</volume><fpage>879</fpage><lpage>885</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04962.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12410696</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-etm-0-0-3008"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seth</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Geringer</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurjala</surname><given-names>AN</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Treatment of <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> biofilm-infected wounds with clinical wound care strategies: A quantitative study using an in vivo rabbit ear model</article-title><source>Plast Reconstr Surg</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>262e</fpage><lpage>274e</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aeb3b</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22286442</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-etm-0-0-3008"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolcott</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Rumbaugh</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>James</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Watters</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Dowd</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time-dependent therapeutic window</article-title><source>J Wound Care</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>320</fpage><lpage>328</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12968/jowc.2010.19.8.77709</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20852503</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-etm-0-0-3008"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schierle</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>De la Garza</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>354</fpage><lpage>359</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00489.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19660043</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-etm-0-0-3008"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roche</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Renick</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tetens</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramsay</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Daniels</surname><given-names>EQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Carson</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Increasing the presence of biofilm and healing delay in a porcine model of MRSA-infected wounds</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>537</fpage><lpage>543</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22672311</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-etm-0-0-3008"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seth</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Geringer</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Quantitative comparison and analysis of species-specific wound biofilm virulence using an in vivo, rabbit-ear model</article-title><source>J Am Coll Surg</source><volume>215</volume><fpage>388</fpage><lpage>399</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.028</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22704819</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-etm-0-0-3008"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brackman</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>De Meyer</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelis</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Coenye</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilm inhibitory and eradicating activity of wound care products against <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> biofilms in an in vitro chronic wound model</article-title><source>J Appl Microbiol</source><volume>114</volume><fpage>1833</fpage><lpage>1842</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12191</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23490006</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-etm-0-0-3008"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watters</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Everett</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Haley</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Clinton</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rumbaugh</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Insulin treatment modulates the host immune system to enhance <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> wound biofilms</article-title><source>Infect Immun</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>92</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/IAI.00651-13</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24126517</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-etm-0-0-3008"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaplan</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilm dispersal: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential therapeutic uses</article-title><source>J Dent Res</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>205</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0022034509359403</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20139339</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-etm-0-0-3008"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Seth</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Geringer</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>KP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mustoe</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Galiano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound as an effective therapy against <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic>-infected biofilm wounds</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>266</fpage><lpage>274</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/wrr.12000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23421692</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-etm-0-0-3008"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Costello</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Amling</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Emerson</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Peer</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Afflu</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Zurakowski</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Jonas</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Negative pressure wound therapy for sternal wound infections following congenital heart surgery</article-title><source>J Wound Care</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12968/jowc.2014.23.1.31</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24406541</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-etm-0-0-3008"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>HT</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Risk of infection with delayed wound coverage by using negative-pressure wound therapy in Gustilo Grade IIIB/IIIC open tibial fracture: An evidence-based review</article-title><source>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>876</fpage><lpage>878</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjps.2012.11.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23219747</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-etm-0-0-3008"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steingrimsson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottfredsson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gudmundsdottir</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sj&#x00F6;gren</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gudbjartsson</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Negative-pressure wound therapy for deep sternal wound infections reduces the rate of surgical interventions for early re-infections</article-title><source>Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>406</fpage><lpage>410</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icvts/ivs254</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22691377</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-etm-0-0-3008"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anagnostakos</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Mosser</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative infections after musculoskeletal tumour surgery</article-title><source>J Wound Care</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>194</lpage><comment>196-197</comment><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12968/jowc.2014.23.4.191</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24762382</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-etm-0-0-3008"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradley</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunningham</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biofilms in chronic wounds and the potential role of negative pressure wound therapy: An integrative review</article-title><source>J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>143</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/WON.0b013e31827e8481</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23354367</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-etm-0-0-3008"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Leavitt</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayer</surname><given-names>LR</given-names></name><name><surname>Orgill</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing</article-title><source>Curr Probl Surg</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>301</fpage><lpage>331</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.04.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24935079</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-etm-0-0-3008"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orgill</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Manders</surname><given-names>EK</given-names></name><name><surname>Sumpio</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Attinger</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurtner</surname><given-names>GC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ehrlich</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: More to learn</article-title><source>Surgery</source><volume>146</volume><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19541009</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-etm-0-0-3008"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morykwas</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Simpson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Punger</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Argenta</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kremers</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Argenta</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Vacuum-assisted closure: State of basic research and physiologic foundation</article-title><source>Plast Reconstr Surg</source><volume>117</volume><issue>7 Suppl</issue><fpage>121S</fpage><lpage>126S</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.prs.0000225450.12593.12</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16799379</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-etm-0-0-3008"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Negative-pressure wound therapy enhances local inflammatory responses in acute infected soft-tissue wound</article-title><source>Cell Biochem Biophys</source><volume>70</volume><fpage>539</fpage><lpage>547</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12013-014-9953-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24748178</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-etm-0-0-3008"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ngo</surname><given-names>QD</given-names></name><name><surname>Vickery</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Deva</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The effect of topical negative pressure on wound biofilms using an in vitro wound model</article-title><source>Wound Repair Regen</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>83</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00747.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22126340</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b43-etm-0-0-3008"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Schultz</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with periodic instillation using antimicrobial solutions on <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> biofilm on porcine skin explants</article-title><source>Int Wound J</source><volume>10</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/iwj.12180</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24251844</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b44-etm-0-0-3008"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valente</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Deva</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngo</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Vickery</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The increased killing of biofilms in vitro by combining topical silver dressings with topical negative pressure in chronic wounds</article-title><source>Int Wound J</source><comment>doi: 10.1111/iwj.12248</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24712658</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b45-etm-0-0-3008"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (US). Committee on Care, Use of Laboratory Animals, and National Institutes of Health (US)</article-title><source>Division of Research Resources: Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals</source><edition>8th</edition><publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc><publisher-name>National Academies Press</publisher-name><year>2011</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b46-etm-0-0-3008"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lalliss</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stinner</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterman</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Branstetter</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Masini</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wenke</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Negative pressure wound therapy reduces <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> wound contamination more than <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic></article-title><source>J Orthop Trauma</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>598</fpage><lpage>602</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ec45ba</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20736802</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b47-etm-0-0-3008"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Assadian</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Assadian</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Stadler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Diab-Elschahawi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bacterial growth kinetic without the influence of the immune system using vacuum-assisted closure dressing with and without negative pressure in an in vitro wound model</article-title><source>Int Wound J</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>289</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00686.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20550601</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b48-etm-0-0-3008"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>SZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>XY</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: An experimental study</article-title><source>Asian J Surg</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60346-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16024319</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b49-etm-0-0-3008"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burian</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rautenberg</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohler</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Fritz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Krismer</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Unger</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Peschel</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolz</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Goerke</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Temporal expression of adhesion factors and activity of global regulators during establishment of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> nasal colonization</article-title><source>J Infect Dis</source><volume>201</volume><fpage>1414</fpage><lpage>1421</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/651619</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20307206</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b50-etm-0-0-3008"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reissig</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Storminger</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Leloir</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A modified colorimetric method for the estimation of N-acetylamino sugars</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>217</volume><fpage>959</fpage><lpage>966</lpage><year>1955</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">13271455</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b51-etm-0-0-3008"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Levy</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Dietary supplementation of N-acetylcysteine enhances early inflammatory responses during cutaneous wound healing in protein malnourished mice</article-title><source>J Nutr Biochem</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>336</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.08.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16214328</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Detection of components of the biofilm matrix from <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected wounds with and without NPWT treatment. NPWT resulted in significant reductions in (A) PIA and (B) eDNA content relative to untreated wounds. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05 and &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 vs. untreated control. Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=10&#x2013;12 wounds/group). NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; PIA, polysaccharide intercellular adhesin; eDNA, extracellular DNA; A<sub>585</sub>, absorbance at 585 nm.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g00.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p>Scanning electron microscopy of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected wounds with and without NPWT treatment. (A) The untreated wounds exhibited a mature biofilm structure. (B) Higher magnification of the same visual field showed large amounts of cocci-shaped <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> embedded within the lattice-like extracellular matrix (arrows). (C) Conversely, wounds treated with NPWT presented approximately equal amounts of bacteria but lack of extracellular matrix, (D) which was more explicit at higher magnification. NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g01.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption><p>Fluorescence light microscopy of NPWT untreated and treated <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected wounds counterstained with ConA and DAPI. (A) GFP-labeled <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (green) formed a mature biofilm on the untreated wound surface (blue), showing a complex structure with large amounts of exopolysaccharide (red) around the bacteria. (B) <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> in the NPWT group spread over the wound bed with sparse exopolysaccharide matrix. (C) As a negative control, an area of wound tissue with no bacterial aggregates was shown to exhibit background staining of ConA. Scale bar = 100 &#x00B5;m. NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; ConA, Concanavalin A; DAPI, 4&#x2032;,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; GFP, green fluorescent protein.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g02.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption><p>Viable bacterial counts from <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected wounds with and without NPWT treatment. Serial bacterial counts from untreated wounds revealed a persistent bacterial burden averaging between 10<sup>5</sup>&#x2212;10<sup>7</sup> CFUs/wound. However, wounds treated with NPWT showed a gradual but significant reduction in viable bacteria compared with untreated controls, with ~10<sup>3</sup> CFUs/wound on POD 13. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001 vs. the untreated control. Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=10&#x2013;12 wounds/group/time-point). NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; CFUs, colony-forming units; POD, postoperative day.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g03.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 5.</label>
<caption><p>Appearance of wounds and wound closure rates. (A) The untreated wounds on POD 13 manifested a delay in healing and film-like exudates overlying the wound surfaces. (B) Conversely, NPWT accelerated wound closure and epithelialization, with clean granulation tissue beds. (C) The wound closure rate, shown as the percentage of initial wound area, was significantly increased in the NPWT group compared with the untreated control group from POD 6. (A and B) Scale bar = 5 mm. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001 vs. the untreated control. Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=12 wounds/group). NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; POD, postoperative day.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g04.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6-etm-0-0-3008" position="float">
<label>Figure 6.</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of histological sections and healing parameters between NPWT untreated and treated <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>-infected wounds. Histological tissue sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin on POD 13, showed that compared with (A) the untreated control, the amounts of new epithelial and granulation tissue in (B) the NPWT-treated wounds were increased. As determined by quantitative analysis, NPWT was shown to result in improvements in all healing parameters, (C) with a significant reduction in epithelial and granulation gaps and (D) increase in new epithelial and granulation areas. Scale bar =1 mm. &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 and &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001 vs. the untreated control. Data are presented as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=10&#x2013;12 wounds/group). EG, epithelial gap; NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; POD, postoperative day.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-11-03-0769-g05.jpg"/>
</fig>
</floats-group>
</article>
