Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal types of cancer in Asia and its incidence is increasing. In Southeastern Asia, the majority of HCCs develops in individuals with chronic HBV or HCV infection (1). Chronic liver disease and liver cirrhosis is considered to be a premalignant state because HCC occurs frequently in the background of liver cirrhosis (2). Currently the treatment modalities in advance HCC is very limited, and therefore development of new strategy for HCC therapy based on molecular pathogenesis is necessary (3).
Adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT), abundantly located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, participates in the formation of mitochondrial permeability transition pore complex, and also plays an important role in the cellular energy metabolism by catalyzing the exchange of mitochondrial ATP for cytosolic ADP and thereby influencing mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (4,5). Human ANT has four isoforms (ANT1, ANT2, ANT3 and ANT4) and the relative expressions of these isoforms are dependent on developmental stages, proliferation status as well as tissue types or cell types. ANT2 is specifically expressed in undifferentiated cells or tissues that are able to proliferate and regenerate; for example, the lymphocytes, kidney and liver (6,7). The expression of ANT2 was recently found to be upregulated in several hormone-dependent cancers (8) and the induction of ANT2 expression in cancer cells was directly associated with glycolytic metabolisms, raising a question regarding the role of ANT2 during carcinogenesis (9–12). ANT2 suppression by a DNA vector-based RNA interference approach expressing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) resulted in ATP depletion and induced cell death in breast cancer cells (13). We also confirmed that the knockdown of ANT2 by shRNA induced cell death in HCC cell lines and screened for the identification of ANT2 shRNA regulated genes in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep3B. As a result, we obtained significant candidate genes and reaffirmed by selecting a specific gene, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), among the genes.
Involvement of SOCS1 in carcinogenesis revealed that SOCS1 is frequently silenced by hypermethylation in HCC (14). Restoration of SOCS1 in HCC cell lines by transient transfection resulted in growth suppression and induction of apoptosis (14). The silencing of gene transcription associated with aberrant DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides in normally unmethylated gene promoter regions is the most widely studied epigenetic abnormality in tumorigenesis (15–17). SOCS1 is a negative regulator of Janus kinase and signal transducer and activation of transcription (Jak-STAT) pathway (18–21). Several studies have indicated that dysregulation of the Jak-STAT pathway is involved in the malignant transformation for commonly-encountered human cancers, such as HCC (14) non-small cell lung cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (22–24). The high prevalence of the aberrant SOCS1 methylation demonstrated the importance of the constitutive activation of the Jak-STAT pathway in the development of HCC (25).
Constitutive activated STAT3 controls the expression of a number of anti-apoptotic proteins on the transcriptional level, including survivin, Bcl-2 and Mcl-1, thereby providing an important fast-track survival signal for tumor cells (26–29). According to recent report, miR-21 was also identified as a target of STAT3. siRNA against STAT3 has much reduced levels of miR-21 (30). Moreover, STAT3-induced miR-21 was important for transformation and tumorigenicity in human cancer and inhibition of miR-21 dramatically reduced tumorigenicity (30). In HCC tissues, miR-21 was markedly increased compared with normal tissues and increased miR-21 expression was a frequent event in human HCC and may be involved in hepatocarcinogenesis. More importantly, the relevance of miR-21 for the oncogenic potential of STAT3 and thereby for its involvement in the pathogenesis of malignancies. Our results show that ANT2 shRNA treatment led to restoration of SOCS1 expression along with its promoter de-methylation in Hep3B cells.
We hypothesized that suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling by ANT2 shRNA induced SOCS1 restoration. It is well known that Ras/PI3K/Akt pathway elevates the cellular DNMT1 protein level. Upregulation of DNMT1 by Ras/PI3K/Akt signal pathway involves transcription activation and mRNA stabilization, and that DNMT1 protein stability was significantly decreased by Ras/PI3K/Akt inhibition. Eventually, epigenetic silencing was decreased through the suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling by ANT2 shRNA. Therefore, inhibition of DNMT1 activity by suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt pathway decreases hyperme-thylated SOCS1 levels.
We assumed that SOCS1 restoration by ANT2 shRNA might inactivate Jak-STAT signaling pathway, thereby down-regulating onco-miR-21 expression and subsequent inhibition of proliferation, in HCC cells. Thus, the purpose of our study was to determine whether or not ANT2 shRNA-mediated SOCS1 restoration suppressed HCC cells proliferation, and to investigate the potential of ANT2 shRNA for future use as a therapeutic agent targeting HCC cells.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and culture
The human hepatoma cell line Hep3B was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere at 37°C.
Antibodies and reagents
Anti-phospho-STAT3, anti-STAT3, anti-SOCS1, anti-phospho-Akt, anti-Akt and anti-β-actin antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).
Construction of ANT2 shRNA expression vectors
The ANT2 shRNA expression vector used to achieve specific downregulation of ANT2 was described previously. ANT2 siRNA (5′-GCAG AUCACUGCAGAUAAGTT-3′) designed to be complementary to exon 2 of ANT2 (GenBank accession no. NM001152) was synthesized, and DNA vectors expressing the shRNA forms of the siRNAs were generated using pSilencer 3.1-H1 puro plasmids with a TTCAAGAGA linker sequence that forms looped structures (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The vector expressing ANT2 shRNA was used throughout this study. A scramble shRNA (Ambion) with no significant homology to human gene sequences was used as a control to detect nonspecific effects.
Transfection
For transfection, cells were plated on either 6-well plates (2×105 cells/well) or 100-mm dishes (2×106 cells) and were allowed to adhere for 24 h. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used for the transfection. Cells were transfected with either pSilencer™ 3.1-H1 puro ANT2 shRNA or pSilencer™ 3.1-H1 puro scramble shRNA vectors. Transfected cells were then cultured for 6 h; culture media were replaced with fresh media supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were harvested 24 or 48 h after transfection. pcDNA, pcDNA-ANT2, daRas, dnRas plasmid or SOCS1 shRNA were transfected into the cells using the same method.
Microarray analysis and statistical analysis
Isolated RNA (500–1,000 ng) was converted to cDNA with reverse transcriptase and an oligo (dT) primer bearing a T7 promoter followed by in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase to create amplified antisense RNA. The amplified RNA was labeled with Cy3 or Cy5. As a reference probe universal human reference RNA (UHR, Stratagene) was amplified and labeled as above. Amplification and labeling efficiency was controlled using NanoDrop. Labeled cRNA was hybridized to Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarrays per the manufacturer’s protocol. After hybridization for 17 h the arrays were washed and scanned using an Agilent scanner and microarray data extracted with Agilent Feature Extraction software.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR)
For the RT-qPCR, total-RNA from the same samples used in microarray analysis was tested by using Bio-Rad iCycler IQ real-time PCR system. PCR primers were designed with Primer Express 2.0 software (Invitrogen). Results are shown as fold change. RT-qPCR was carried out with the PrimerScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan) and SYBR-Green real-time PCR Master mix (Takara) according to manufacturer’s instruction. The housekeeping gene GAPDH was used for standardization of the initial RNA content of a sample. Relative changes of gene expression were calculated by the following formula, and the data are represented as fold upregulation/downregulation, fold change = 2−ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt = (Ct of gene of interest, treated −Ct of HK gene, treated) − (Ct of gene of interest, control−Ct of HK gene, control), Ct was the threshold cycle number and HK was the house-keeping gene.
Western blot analysis
For western blot analyses, cells were harvested after 24 or 48 h of transfection and lysed with lysis buffer (5 mM/l ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid; 300mM/l NaCl; 0.1% NP-40; 0.5 mM/l NaF; 0.5 mM/l Na3VO4; 0.5 mM/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; and 10 μg/ml each of aprotinin, pepstatin and leupeptin; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Following centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 30 min, the concentrations of supernatant proteins were analyzed using the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). For analysis of protein contents, 50 μg of total proteins was electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), which were then incubated with the respective antibodies indicated above. Immunoblots were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden).
Methylation-specific PCR (MSP)
Genomic DNA was obtained and purified using QIAamp DNA mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The unmethylated cytosines in aliquots containing 500 ng DNA were converted to uracil using MethylCode Bisulfite Conversion Kits (Invitrogen). We modified the manufacturer’s instructions by extending the desulfonation step to 30 min to ensure complete conversion of the genomic DNA and by pre-warming the elution buffer to 50°C to increase the DNA yield. Methylation-specific PCR for SOCS1 was performed using the primer pair 5′-TTC GCG TGT ATT TTT AGG TCG GTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGA CAC AAC TCC TAC AAC GAC CG-3′ (reverse) for methylated DNA and the pair 5′-TTA TGA GTA TTT GTG TGT ATT TTT AGG TTG GTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGA CAC AAC TCC TAC AAC GAC CG-3′ (reverse) for unmethylated DNA. PCR mixtures contained 1X PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 200 mM dNTPs, 200 nM of each primer, 0.05 U/ml Taq polymerase and 6 ng/ml converted DNA as the template. PCR products were resolved in 2% agarose gels in 1X Tris/borate/EDTA buffer and stained with ethidium bromide.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Cells were collected after 24 h of transfection. Total-RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For RT-PCR analysis, 5 μg total-RNA was reverse-transcribed using RT-PCR kits (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR was used for amplification of target cDNA under the following conditions: 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min. PCR products were analyzed using standard agarose gel electrophoresis. The primer sequences were: for SOCS1, forward 5′-TTGCCTGGAACCATGTGG-3′ and reverse 5′-GGTCCTGGCCTCCAGATACAG-3′; for β-actin, forward 5′-GCTCCG GCATGTGCAA-3′ and reverse 5′-GCTC CGGCATGTGCAA-3′.
DNA methyltranserase 1 (DNMT1) activity assay
Nuclear extracts from Hep3B cells transfected for 24 h with ANT2 or scramble shRNA (control) were evaluated for DNMT1 activity using an EpiQuik Dnmt1 Assay Kit (Epigentek Inc., Brooklyn, NY, USA).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
Nuclear extracts of Hep3B transfected with scramble or ANT2 shRNA, were prepared and EMSA performed. In brief, for EMSA, 3.4 μg of total nuclear protein were used for each lane. The oligonucleotide sequence used to assess the STAT3 consensus-binding motif 5′-GATCCTTCTGGGAATTCCTAGATC-3′. All oligos were synthetized by Bioneer (Dajeon, Korea). The synthetic oligonucleotides were labeled using a T4 polynucleotide kinase (DNA 5′-End Labeling Kit; Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and [γ32P]-CTP (Perkin Elmer, Rodgau-Jügesheim, Germany). Following incubation of the radiolabeled probes with nuclear extracts, protein-DNA complexes were resolved on a NOVEX 6% retardation gel (Invitrogen) and detected using a Typhoon 9410 PhosphoImager (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays
ChIP assay was carried out using the ChIP-IT Express Enzymatic kit (Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, chromatin from cells was cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde (10 min at 22°C), sheared to an average size of ∼500 bp and then immunoprecipitated with anti-STAT3 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The ChIP-PCR primers were designed to amplify a proximal promoter region containing putative binding sites in the miR-21 promoter identified by TFSEARCH.
MTT cell proliferation assay
Cell proliferation was measured using the MTT assay (Sigma). The reduction of tetrazolium salts is now widely accepted as a reliable way to examine cell proliferation. The yellow tetrazolium MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) is reduced by metabolically active cells, in part by the action of dehydrogenase enzymes, to generate reducing equivalents such as NADH and NADPH. The resulting intracellular purple formazan can be solubilized and quantified by spectrophotometric means. Results of cell proliferation assays are presented as the mean values of three replicate experiments performed in triplicate.
Results
ANT2 shRNA induces specific restoration of SOCS1 through the demethylation of SOCS1 promoter in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep3B
We first microarray screened for the identification of ANT2 shRNA regulated genes in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep3B (Fig. 1A). We obtained significant candidate genes and reaffirmed by selecting a specific gene, SOCS1, among the genes. The SOCS1 gene has been demonstrated to be frequently silenced by methylation of the CpG islands in human HCC. As shown in Fig. 1B, SOCS1 was upregulated by ANT2 shRNA. However, ANT2 shRNA had little influence on SOCS3 expression. These data suggested that ANT2 shRNA upregulated the SOCS1 expression specifically in Hep3B. Furthermore, we observed that ANT2 shRNA decreased hyper-methylated levels and increased unmethylated levels of SOCS1 and that dominant active Ras suppressed unmethylated levels of SOCS1 and recovered reduction of hyper-methylated levels of SOCS1 in Hep3B cells (Fig. 2A). In SOCS1 expression, the result matched those in Fig. 2B. Thus, SOCS1 upregulation in response to ANT2 knockdown is mediated by SOCS1 promoter demethylation.
ANT2 shRNA reduces activity of DNA methyl-transferase 1 (DNMT1), by inhibiting Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line Hep3B
Here, we examined whether ANT2 knockdown by shRNA affected activity of DNMT1 and whether this might be regulated by the Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Ras protein is the most well-characterized proto-oncogene and Ras signaling is known to regulate diverse cellular functions including cell growth, survival and migration. Indeed, the level of DNA methyltransferase and DNA methylation are controlled by the RAS signaling pathway. Akt (also named protein kinase B) is a downstream target of Ras signaling pathway and is a critical mediator of survival signals for protection of cells from apoptosis. Especially, relationship between Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling and epigenetic silencing have been reported. Activated Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling is a trigger of epigenetic silencing. To detect the regulation of Ras/PI3K/Akt activity by ANT2 shRNA, we examined phosphorylated Akt levels was decreased by knockdown of ANT2 by shRNA (Fig. 3A). A report that DNMT1 activation is involved in Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling and our observations that ANT2 knockdown inactivates Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling and causes demethylation of the SOCS1 promoter in Hep3B cells, led us to investigate the role of DNMT1 in ANT2 shRNA-induced restoration of SOCS1. Besides, DNMT1 activity assays showed transfection with dominant active Ras restored the reduction of DNMT1 activity in Hep3B cells transfected with ANT2 shRNA and dominant negative Ras also suppressed DNMT1 activity (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these findings suggested that ANT2 shRNA treatment led to restoration of SOCS1 expression along with its promoter demethylation in Hep3B cells, which was accompanied by decreased DNMT1 activity through suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling.
Restoration of SOCS1 by ANT2 shRNA inhibits STAT3 activity
We observed that ANT2 shRNA transfection recovered SOCS1 expression levels in Hep3B cells. Because SOCS1 is known to a negative regulator of Janus kinase and signal transducer and activation of transcription (Jak-STAT) pathway, we anticipated that STAT3 might be inactivated by restored SOCS1 by ANT2 knockdown. As expected, ANT2 shRNA treatment inhibits phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of STAT3 (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, the phosphorylation of STAT3 in ANT2 shRNA-transfected cells was inhibited by the SOCS1 shRNA (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these findings suggest that ANT2 knockdown reduces hypermethylation of SOCS1 promoter to restore SOCS1 expression, which then inactivates the Jak-STAT signaling pathway.
Inactivation of STAT3 by ANT2 shRNA downregulates onco-miR-21 expression
Because silencing of SOCS1 in hepatocellular carcinoma is attributable to enhanced activation of STAT3, as a result, induced proliferation and tumorigenesis. A STAT3 target gene that was described previously is the gene encoding the primary transcript of miR-21. To assay the suppression of the miR-21 by ANT2 shRNA, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of RNA isolated from Hep3B cells transfected with scramble or ANT2 shRNA showed that the expression of miR-21 is suppressed by ANT2 shRNA (Fig. 5A). We investigated whether miR-21 is also a direct STAT3 target. Cells were transfected with ANT2 shRNA to inactivate STAT3, and analyzed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Chromatin that was precipitated with STAT3 antibodies was significantly enriched for the miR-21 promoter sequence when compared with chromatin precipitated with normal rabbit IgG. As a control, PCR was performed on the precipitated chromatin for the promoter of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), a promoter that lacks STAT3 binding sites. No precipitation of the GAPDH promoter was observed with or without ANT2 shRNA, demonstrating the specificity of the ChIP (Fig. 5B). Collectively, restoration of SOCS1 by ANT2 knockdown, subsequently inhibited STAT3 activity and downregulated the expression of miR-21, which has been reported to be an important onco-miR in HCC and other carcinomas. Furthermore, this suppression of miR-21 by ANT2 shRNA was restored by ANT2 or SOCS1 overexpression (Fig. 5A and B) and reduction of phospho-STAT3 levels was restored by ANT2 overexpression (Fig. 5C). Moreover, reduction of miR-21 was recovered by ANT2 or SOCS1 over-expression in ANT2 shRNA transected Hep3B cells (Fig. 5D and E). These results suggested that inhibition of Jak-STAT signaling by ANT2 shRNA might play an important role in the downregulation of miR-21.
Downregulation of miR-21 by ANT2 shRNA inhibits cell proliferation
Reduction of miR-21 levels by miR-21 inhibitor inhibited proliferation. Similar inhibition of cell growth and proliferation effects was also observed in ANT2 shRNA transfected cells (Fig. 6A). Downregulation of miR-21 efficiently suppressed Hep3B cell proliferation in vitro with a comparable level to ANT2 shRNA treatment. Overall, the possible pathogenesis of miR-21 suppression by ANT2 shRNA-induced SOCS1 restoration is illustrated in Fig. 6B.
Discussion
Recently, the potential role of the Jak/STAT pathway in oncogenesis has been proposed in many kinds of tumors (31,32). The SOCS family has been identified as a negative feedback protein of Jak/STAT signaling pathway. These proteins are activated by STATs and negatively regulate the Jak/STAT pathway by inhibiting the Jaks directly or blocking the access of the STATs (33). Among the SOCS family molecules, the SOCS1 expression was suppressed through aberrant methylation of the CpG islands in several HCC studies. Promoter methylation in the SOCS1 CpG islands was identified in primary HCC. Moreover, SOCS1 methylation was observed more frequently in HCCs derived from cirrhosis than in those not derived from cirrhosis. This report suggests that inactivation of SOCS1 might be an important factor in carcinogenesis of HCC (25,34).
The overexpression of ANT2 in cancer cells was found to be associated with glycolytic metabolism of cancer cells, which raised a possible role of ANT2 during carcinogenesis (10). In fact, we and others have shown that ANT2 knockdown decreased cell viability and induced apoptotic death in cancer cells and also can sensitize cancer cells to a kind of chemotherapeutic agents (8,13).
In the work shown here, knockdown of ANT2 by shRNA restored SOCS1 expression and suppressed HCC cell proliferation. We also observed that ANT2 shRNA treatment led to restoration of SOCS1 expression along with its promoter demethylation in Hep3B cells, which was accompanied by decreased DNA methyl-transferase 1 (DNMT1) activity through suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling. Generally, DNMT1 is overexpressed in several cancers and upregulated by oncogenic pathways and downregulated by tumor suppressive pathways (35–37). Recently, prolonged half-life of DNMT1 protein in cancer has also been reported, the mechanism of its regulation is found that Akt activity positively correlates with DNMT1 protein level but not mRNA level. Akt is a serine/threonine protein kinase activated downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K). The mechanism attributed to epigenetic role of PI3K/Akt in regulating protein stability of a pivotal epigenetic molecule-DNMT1. Activated PI3K/Akt signaling greatly stabilizes DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) by attenuating the ubiquitin proteosome reaction in cancer cells (38). In this study, we observed that the suppression of Ras/PI3K/Akt signaling by ANT2 shRNA induced SOCS1 restoration through the inhibition of DNMT1.
Restoration of SOCS1 by ANT2 knockdown, subsequently, inhibited STAT3 activity and downregulated the expression of miR-21, which has been reported to be an important onco-miR in HCC. Downregulation of miR-21 efficiently suppressed Hep3B cell proliferation in vitro with a comparable level to ANT2 shRNA treatment. We demonstrated here for the first time that ANT2 shRNA induces suppression of proliferation, accompanied by inactivation of STAT3 through restoration of SOCS1 in HCC cell lines.
According to another report, the restoration of SOCS1 suppressed both growth rate and anchorage-independent growth of cells in which SOCS1 was methylation-silenced and Jak2 was constitutively activated (14). This growth suppression was caused by apoptosis and was reproduced by AG490, a specific, chemical Jak2 inhibitor that reversed constitutive phosphorylation of STAT3 in SOCS1 inactivated cells. The high prevalence of the aberrant SOCS1 methylation and its growth suppression activity demonstrated the importance of the constitutive activation of the Jak/STAT pathway in the development of HCC. It also indicates therapeutic strategies for the treatment of HCC including use of SOCS1 in gene therapy and inhibition of Jak2 by small molecules, such as AG490 (14). In the present study, ANT2 shRNA suppressed onco-miR-21 expression and STAT3 activition and preceded restoration of SOCS1. We thus hypo thesized that ANT2 shRNA may also inhibit the Jak/STAT signaling pathway through the restoration of SOCS1, which may explain why ANT2 shRNA can suppress the growth rate of the HCC cell line. This study provides strong evidence that inactivation of Jak/STAT signaling pathway by ANT2 shRNA downregulates onco-miR-21 expression as well as inhibits proliferation. ANT2 suppression by shRNA might be able to exert anticancer effect in HCC further by restoring the SOCS1 expression.
miRNAs play important roles in multiple biological processes such as development, differentiation, and cellular stress response (39). Recent studies have linked deregulation of miRNAs to various diseases including cancer (40). According to recent reports, dramatic upregulation of miR-21 is observed in HCC and dysregulation of miR-21 is associated with HCC formation and progression. Moreover, uncontrolled proliferation, lack of apoptosis, and invasiveness, all modulated by miR-21, were also found to be present in tumorigenesis (41). Several questions remain unanswered. For example, miR-21 targets multiple negative regulators of Ras signaling, but the molecular alteration caused by miR-21-mediated Ras regulation remains unidentified (42). miR-21 is a potential onco-miR that plays important roles in HCC formation and progression. Moreover, a regulatory loop between Ras/PI3K/Akt pathway and miR-21 is mediated by STAT3. In conclusion, the ANT2 suppression by shRNA might be able to exert anticancer effect in HCC further by restoring the SOCS1 expression.