We recently reported that the tumor suppressor Runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) is silenced in colorectal cancer cells via oxidative stress-induced hypermethylation of its promoter. The resulting downregulation of RUNX3 expression influences cell proliferation. Activation of the Akt signaling pathway is also associated with cell survival and proliferation; however, the effects of oxidative stress on the relationship between RUNX3 and Akt signaling are largely unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the mechanisms involved in cell proliferation caused by oxidative stress-induced silencing of RUNX3. The levels of RUNX3 mRNA and protein were downregulated in response to treatment of the human colorectal cancer cell line SNU-407 with H2O2. Treatment of the cells with H2O2 also upregulated Akt mRNA and protein expression, and inhibited the binding of RUNX3 to the Akt promoter. The inverse correlation between the expression levels of RUNX3 and Akt in H2O2-treated cells was also associated with nuclear translocation of β-catenin and upregulation of cyclin D1 expression, which induced cell proliferation. H2O2 treatment also increased the binding of β-catenin to the cyclin D1 promoter. The results presented here demonstrate that reactive oxygen species silence the tumor suppressor RUNX3, enhance the Akt-mediated signaling pathway, and promote the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are mutagenic and hence may promote cancer (1). ROS modulate growth signals and regulate gene expression, leading to the sustained proliferation of cancer cells (2). Oxidative stress caused by metabolic, dietary, and environmental factors leads to excessive production of ROS, which can then induce genetic alterations, including frameshift mutations in tumor suppressor genes (3,4) such as the type II transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor (5). These mutations may allow colon epithelial cells to escape growth restriction mediated by ligation of TGF-β to its type II receptor.
In addition to genetic alterations, epigenetic changes also result in the loss of or aberrant expression of genes associated with carcinogenesis (6). ROS trigger DNA methylation of tumor suppressor gene promoters; Lim et al have suggested a functional pathway model of ROS-induced epigenetic changes in which persistently elevated levels of ROS induce CpG methylation in the promoter region of the gene encoding the tumor suppressor E-cadherin, via specific recognition of an E-box motif by Snail (7). In addition, the tumor suppressor Runt-related transcription factor 3 (RUNX3) is silenced by ROS-induced epigenetic regulation in colorectal cancer cells (8).
Akt signaling upregulates the Wnt signaling pathway via inhibitory phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), which results in stabilization of β-catenin and its relocation from the cell membrane to the nucleus, where it is recruited into TCF/LEF transcriptional regulatory complexes (9–11). TCF/LEF complexes bind to enhancer regions of target genes involved in proliferation, invasion, and inhibition of apoptosis, including c-Myc and cyclin D1. These effects contribute directly to colon cancer development.
RUNX3 is a tumor suppressor that is involved in various cancers, including gastric cancer (12,13). RUNX3 knockout mice exhibit gastric epithelial hyperplasia, reduced levels of apoptosis, and reduced sensitivity to TGF-β (14). Approximately 45–60% of human gastric cancers display a loss of RUNX3 expression due to hemizygous deletion and promoter hypermethylation (14). By interacting with Smad2/3, Smad4, p300, and FoxO3a to regulate the transcription of target genes, RUNX3 is involved in the TGF-β-mediated signaling pathway (15). RUNX3 suppresses gastric tumorigenesis by upregulating p21 (16), Bim (17), and Claudin-1 (18). The gastrointestinal tract, particularly the colon and rectum, is constantly exposed to ROS originating from endogenous and exogenous sources (19). The involvement of ROS in colorectal cancer remains speculative; however, numerous epidemiological studies suggest that oxidative stress is an important factor in cancer initiation and progression (13,20,21).
We recently reported that oxidative stress downregulates RUNX3 expression by upregulating DNA methyltransferase 1 and histone deacetylase, resulting in hypermethylation of the RUNX3 promoter (8). In this study, we investigated whether oxidative stress is able to regulate the Akt signaling pathway by reducing the expression of the RUNX3 tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer cells.
Materials and methodsCell culture
The human colorectal cancer cell line SNU-407 (Korean Cell Line Bank, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and penicillin (100 U/ml).
Western blot analysis
Nuclear extracts were prepared using a Nuclear Protein Extraction kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The nuclear extracts were lysed on ice for 4 min in 1 ml of lysis buffer comprising 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and 1% NP-40. After centrifugation for 10 min at 3000 × g, the pellets were re-suspended in 50 μl of extraction buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF), incubated on ice for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 13000 × g for 5 min. After determination of the protein concentration, the supernatants were stored at −70°C. Aliquots of the lysates (40 μg of protein) were boiled for 5 min and then electrophoresed on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Blots of the gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, which were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies and then with secondary immunoglobulin-G horseradish peroxidase conjugates (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The protein bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence western blotting detection kit (Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) and were visualized using a luminescent image analyzer.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells plated on coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and then permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 2.5 min. Cells were treated with blocking medium (PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin) for 1 h and incubated with an anti-RUNX3 antibody diluted in blocking medium for 2 h. The primary anti-RUNX3 antibody was detected by incubation with a 1:500 dilution of the FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h. After washing with PBS, the stained cells were mounted onto microscope slides in mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). Images were collected using the LSM 510 program on a Zeiss confocal microscope.
Trypan blue staining
Trypan blue solution (0.4%) was added to the cell suspension at a 1:5 ratio and the suspension was incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Viable cells that did not show any staining were counted under a microscope using a hemocytometer.
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from cells using Trizol reagent (GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) and the cDNA was amplified using 1 μl of reverse transcription reaction buffer, primers, dNTPs, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase in a final volume of 25 μl, as described previously (22). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, and then a final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min. The following primers were used to amplify human RUNX3 and Akt: RUNX3 sense, 5′-GGCAATGACGAGAACTAC-3′ (located in exon 2); RUNX3 antisense, 5′-GGAGAATGGGTTCAGTTC-3′ (located in exon 5); Akt sense, 5′-GCAGCACGTGTACGAGAAGA-3′; and Akt antisense, 5′-GGTGTCAGTCTCCGACGTG-3′. The amplified products were resolved by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and then photographed under UV light using Image Quant™ TL analysis software (Amersham Bioscience, Sweden).
Transient transfection of small interfering RNA (siRNA)
Cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 1.5×105 cells/well and allowed to reach approximately 50% confluency. Cells were then transfected with 10–50 nM of a mismatched siRNA control (siControl; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or an siRNA targeted against RUNX3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) using Lipofectamine RNAiMax reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were treated with 5-fluorouracil for a further 48 h and then examined using an MTT assay.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay
The ChIP assay was performed using the SimpleChIP™ enzymatic chromatin IP kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with slight modifications. Briefly, cells were pre-treated with 1 mM N-acetyl cysteine for 1 h, treated with H2O2 for 48 h, and then cross-linked by the addition of 1% formaldehyde. Chromatin was prepared and digested with nuclease for 12 min at 37°C. The ChIP assay was performed using a DNMT1 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and normal rabbit IgG. The antibodies were added to the chromatin digests and the mixtures were incubated overnight at 4°C with constant rotation. ChIP-grade protein G magnetic beads were added to capture the immunoprecipitated complexes. The beads were washed and the immunoprecipitates were eluted with ChIP elution buffer. The cross-links were reversed by incubation at 65°C for 30 min and then proteinase K was added and the samples were incubated for a further 2 h at 65°C. The immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were purified using spin columns and the DNA recovered from the immunoprecipitated complexes was subjected to 35 cycles of PCR amplification. The primers used to amplify the DNA fragment were as follows (23): RUNX3 binding site 1 (RBS1) sense, 5′-TTTCCATCCTGCTAAGTACTT-3′; RBS1 antisense, 5′-GATCCCAACATGGGTCTTTCC-3′; RBS2 sense, 5′-ACTTGTCTGAACCTCTCTTTG-3′; RBS2 antisense, 5′-AAAGCAAAGAAATTCAAACAT-3′; catenin binding site sense, 5′-GAGCGCATGCTAAGCTGAAA-3′; and catenin binding site antisense, 5′-GGACAGACGGCCAAAGAATC-3′. The PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels and the DNA bands were visualized using the Image program (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
All measurements were performed in triplicate and all data are represented as the mean ± SEM. The results were subjected to an analysis of variance using Tukey’s test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
ResultsROS downregulate RUNX3 expression and upregulate Akt expression in SNU-407 cells
In a previous study, we demonstrated that oxidative stress attenuates RUNX3 expression in human colorectal cancer SNU-407 cells (8). To confirm this finding, SNU-407 cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2 for 48 h and a significant decrease in nuclear RUNX3 protein levels were detected by immunoblot and confocal imaging analyses (Figs. 1A and 1B). In addition, growth of the SNU-407 cells was significantly increased by the H2O2 treatment (Fig. 1C). These results suggest that RUNX3 has a negative influence on the proliferation of SNU-407 cells. RUNX3 represses Akt1 expression through transcriptional inhibition and the loss of RUNX3 promotes tumorigenesis via activation of the Akt1/β-catenin/cyclin D1 signaling pathway (23). In agreement with these findings, immunoblot analyses revealed that treatment of SNU-407 cells with H2O2 resulted in substantial increases in total Akt and phosphorylated Akt protein levels (Fig. 1D).
ROS reverse RUNX3-mediated repression of Akt transcription
Next, to investigate the inverse correlation between RUNX3 and Akt expression, a siRNA was used to knockdown endogenous RUNX3 in SNU-407 cells, which express high levels of the tumor suppressor. Total and phosphorylated Akt protein levels were higher in cells treated with a RUNX3-specific siRNA than in cells treated with a control siRNA (Fig. 2). The inverse correlation between RUNX3 and Akt expression was further confirmed by RT-PCR. Cells treated with H2O2 for up to 48 h showed a time-dependent decrease in the level of RUNX3 mRNA and a parallel increase in the level of Akt mRNA (Fig. 3A). Two RUNX3-binding sites (RBS1 and RBS2) with the consensus sequence ‘TGTGGT’ are present in the Akt1 promoter region. A ChIP assay revealed that, compared with control cells, those treated with H2O2 displayed decreased binding of RUNX3 to the RBS1 and RBS2 sites (Figs. 3B and 3C).
ROS regulate the Akt1/β-catenin signaling pathway
There are many reports that ROS regulate cell survival by modulating the Akt signaling pathway (24,25). Treatment of SNU-407 cells with H2O2 induced β-catenin expression and GSK-3β phosphorylation (Fig. 4A). A previous study demonstrated that RUNX3 reduces the nuclear localization, transactivation, and stability of β-catenin protein (23); therefore, we examined the effect of ROS on the expression and localization of endogenous β-catenin in SNU-407 cells using immunoblot and immunocytochemical analyses. Levels of β-catenin in the nucleus were dramatically higher in H2O2-treated cells than in control cells (Fig. 4B and 4C), indicating that ROS induce the expression and nuclear localization of β-catenin in RUNX3-positive cells.
ROS regulate the β-catenin-mediated induction of cyclin D1
Cyclin D1 is a downstream effector of the Akt1/β-catenin signaling pathway that preferentially binds to and activates CDK4 and CDK6 at G1 phase to initiate cell cycle progression (26,27). Therefore, the effects of ROS on the expression of cyclin D1 and its associated signaling molecules were examined. The cyclin D1 promoter contains adjacent TCF/LEF (at −81 bp) and CREB (at −58 bp) binding sites (28). To determine whether ROS induce cyclin D1 via their effects on β-catenin, ChIP assays were used to investigate the interaction of β-catenin with the cyclin D1 promoter. Exposure of SNU-407 cells to H2O2 for 48 h increased the amount of cyclin D1 promoter DNA that co-immunoprecipitated with β-catenin (Fig. 5A), indicating that ROS initiate the recruitment of β-catenin to the cyclin D1 promoter. Exposure of the cells to H2O2 also increased β-catenin-mediated cyclin D1 protein expression in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these results indicate that ROS silence RUNX3 expression and activate the Akt1/β-catenin/cyclin D1 signaling pathway, which promotes tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer.
Discussion
An imbalance in the production or removal of ROS can be either directly or indirectly involved in the initiation, promotion, and progression phases of carcinogenesis (29). The generation of ROS is involved in the Akt signaling pathway (30,31) and Akt may foster tumorigenesis in multiple ways (32,33). For example, Akt stabilizes Myc and cyclin D1 and induces degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27, all of which promote cell cycle progression (34).
This study demonstrates that ROS repress RUNX3 and induce Akt expression and the subsequent GSK-3β/β-catenin/cyclin D1 cascade. Knockdown of endogenous RUNX3 in SNU-407 cells increased the expression and phosphorylation of Akt, as well as cell proliferation. The ROS-induced upregulation of Akt and β-catenin led to the induction of cyclin D1 expression. Therefore, we conclude that downregulation of RUNX3 by ROS leads to activation of the Akt signaling pathway in colorectal cancer.
Over-activation of Akt in cancer cells often occurs as the result of chromosome deletion, genetic mutation, or amplification of the genes that can regulate the activity of Akt. In fact, deletion of the PTEN gene (35) and mutation of the gene encoding phosphoinositide-3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide have been associated with over-activation of Akt (36). However, the occurrence of genetic alterations of Akt itself is relatively low in gastric cancer (37). Recent studies demonstrate that β-catenin/TCF/LEF, STAT3, and CREB regulate the activity of the Akt 1 promoter (38,39). In addition, binding sites for AP1, Sp1, and NF-κB in the Akt 1 promoter have been predicted by software screening (39).
The tumor suppressor RUNX3 is frequently inactivated in gastric cancer tissues (14) and its aberrant activity is closely related to metastatic outcome (40). It has been postulated that the mechanism for RUNX3 inactivation in cancer cells and tissues involves hypermethylation of its promoter region (14,41). The RUNX3 gene is located on human chromosome 1p36 (14), a region containing many genes that play roles in the maintenance of chromosome stability, suppression of tumorigenesis, control of apoptosis, and DNA methylation (42). Deletions in the 1p36 region are common in colorectal cancers (42–45), suggesting that gene loss in this region affects chromosome stability (43). RUNX3 interacts with mSin3 and Groucho/TLE, which associate with histone deacetylases and SUV39H1, a histone methyltransferase, to inhibit or silence gene transcription (46). The two RUNX3-binding sites in the Akt promoter are adjacent to STAT3-binding motifs and β-catenin/TCF-binding elements. It is possible that binding of RUNX3 to this region blocks the ability of other transcriptional activators to bind to the Akt promoter. RUNX3 can interact with the β-catenin/TCF complex and this interaction reduces its ability to promote the transcription of target genes in colorectal cancer (47). In this study, we demonstrated that β-catenin is activated by ROS; however, we were not able to investigate the possibility that RUNX3 interacts with the β-catenin/TCF complex before binding to the Akt promoter, leading to the inhibition of Akt transcription. Further studies are required to investigate the association between RUNX3 and β-catenin during tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer.
Taken together, the data presented here suggest that oxidative stress may play an important role in inhibiting the activation of the tumor suppressor RUNX3 and the subsequent regulation of the Akt/β-catenin/cyclin D1 cascade in human colorectal cancer cells. This effect of ROS may be associated with the progression of colorectal cancer.
This study was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (1120340).
ReferencesShibutaniSTakeshitaMGrollmanAPInsertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodGNature3494314341991HussainSPHofsethLJHarrisCCRadical causes of cancerNat Rev Cancer32762852003GascheCChangCLRheesJGoelAOxidative stress increases frameshift mutations in human colorectal cancer cellsCancer Res61744474482001ZienolddinySRybergDHaugenAInduction of microsatellite mutations by oxidative agents in human lung cancer cell linesCarcinogenesis21152115262000MarkowitzSWangJMyeroffLInactivation of the type II TGF-beta receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instabilityScience268133613381995SugimuraTUshijimaTGenetic and epigenetic alterations in carcinogenesisMutat Res4622352462000LimSOGuJMKimMSEpigenetic changes induced by reactive oxygen species in hepatocellular carcinoma: methylation of the E-cadherin promoterGastroenterology135212821402008KangKAZhangRKimGYBaeSCEpigenetic changes induced by oxidative stress in colorectal cancer cells: methylation of tumor suppressor RUNX3Tumour Biol334034122012LovattMBijlmakersMJStabilisation of beta-catenin downstream of T cell receptor signallingPLoS One5e127942010McManusEJSakamotoKArmitLJRole that phosphorylation of GSK3 plays in insulin and Wnt signalling defined by knockin analysisEMBO J24157115832005FuchsSYOugolkovAVSpiegelmanVSMinamotoTOncogenic beta-catenin signaling networks in colorectal cancerCell Cycle4152215392005BaeSCChoiJKTumor suppressor activity of RUNX3Oncogene23433643402004SubramaniamMMChanJYYeohGKMolecular pathology of RUNX3 in human carcinogenesisBiochim Biophys Acta17963153312009LiQLItoKSakakuraCCausal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancerCell1091131242002ChuangLSItoYRUNX3 is multifunctional in carcinogenesis of multiple solid tumorsOncogene29260526152010ChiXZYangJOLeeKYRUNX3 suppresses gastric epithelial cell growth by inducing p21(WAF1/Cip1) expressionMol Cell Biol25809781072005YanoTItoKFukamachiHThe RUNX3 tumor suppressor upregulates Bim in gastric epithelial cells undergoing transforming growth factor beta-induced apoptosisMol Cell Biol26447444882006ChangTLItoKKoTKClaudin-1 has tumor suppressive activity and is a direct target of RUNX3 in gastric epithelial cellsGastroenterology1382552652010BlauSRubisteinABassPDifferences in the reducing power along the rat GI tract: lower antioxidant capacity of the colonMol Cell Biochem1941851911999BenharMEngelbergDLevitzkiAROS, stress-activated kinases and stress-signaling in cancerEMBO Rep34204252002SkrzydlewskaESulkowskiSKodaMLipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in colorectal cancerWorld J Gastroenterol114034062005ChenJCHuangKCLinWWHMG-CoA reductase inhibitors upregulate heme oxygenase-1 expression in murine RAW264.7 macrophages via ERK, p38 MAPK and protein kinase G pathwaysCell Signal1832392006LinFCLiuYPLaiCHRUNX3-mediated transcriptional inhibition of Akt suppresses tumorigenesis of human gastric cancer cellsOncogene31430243162012LeeYJJeongHYKimYBReactive oxygen species and PI3K/Akt signaling play key roles in the induction of Nrf2-driven heme oxygenase-1 expression in sulforaphane-treated human mesothelioma MSTO-211H cellsFood Chem Toxicol501161232012IraniKOxidant signaling in vascular cell growth, death, and survival: a review of the roles of reactive oxygen species in smooth muscle and endothelial cell mitogenic and apoptotic signalingCirc Res871791832000OsakiMOshimuraMItoHPI3K-Akt pathway: its functions and alterations in human cancerApoptosis96676762004MalumbresMBarbacidMCell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigmNat Rev Cancer91531662009PradeepASharmaCSathyanarayanaPGastrin-mediated activation of cyclin D1 transcription involves beta-catenin and CREB pathways in gastric cancer cellsOncogene23368936992004KangDHOxidative stress, DNA damage, and breast cancerAACN Clinical Issues135405492002WangXMcCulloughKDFrankeTFHolbrookNJEpidermal growth factor receptor-dependent Akt activation by oxidative stress enhances cell survivalJ Biol Chem27514624146312000HuangCLiJDingMUV Induces phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt) at Ser-473 and Thr-308 in mouse epidermal Cl 41 cells through hydrogen peroxideJ Biol Chem27640234402402001ManningBDCantleyLCAKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstreamCell129126112742007PlasDRThompsonCBAkt-dependent transformation: there is more to growth than just survivingOncogene24743574422005LosMMaddikaSErbBSchulze-OsthoffKSwitching Akt: from survival signaling to deadly responseBioessays314924952009OkiEBabaHTokunagaEAkt phosphorylation associates with LOH of PTEN and leads to chemoresistance for gastric cancerInt J Cancer1173763802005LiVSWongCWChanTLMutations of PIK3CA in gastric adenocarcinomaBMC Cancer5292005SoungYHLeeJWNamSWMutational analysis of AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3 genes in common human carcinomasOncology702852892006DihlmannSKloorMFallsehrCvon Knebel DoeberitzMRegulation of AKT1 expression by beta-catenin/Tcf/Lef signaling in colorectal cancer cellsCarcinogenesis26150315122005MisraUKPizzoSVUpregulation of AKT1 protein expression in forskolin-stimulated macrophage: evidence from ChIP analysis that CREB binds to and activates the AKT1 promoterJ Cell Biochem100102210332007FahrnerJAEguchiSHermanJGBaylinSBDependence of histone modifications and gene expression on DNA hypermethylation in cancerCancer Res62721372182002LiQLKimHRKimWJTranscriptional silencing of the RUNX3 gene by CpG hypermethylation is associated with lung cancerBiochem Biophys Res Commun3142232282004Di VinciAInfusiniENigroSIntratumor distribution of 1p deletions in human colorectal adenocarcinoma is commonly homogeneous: indirect evidence of early involvement in colorectal tumorigenesisCancer834154221998Di VinciAInfusiniEPeveriCCorrelation between 1p deletions and aneusomy in human colorectal adenomasInt J Cancer7545501998TanakaKYanoshitaRKonishiMSuppression of tumourigenicity in human colon carcinoma cells by introduction of normal chromosome 1p36 regionOncogene8225322581993PramlCFinkeLHHerfarthCDeletion mapping defines different regions in 1p34.2-pter that may harbor genetic information related to human colorectal cancerOncogene11135713621995DurstKLHiebertSWRole of RUNX family members in transcriptional repression and gene silencingOncogene23422042242004ItoYRUNX genes in development and cancer: regulation of viral gene expression and the discovery of RUNX family genesAdv Cancer Res9933762008Figures
ROS downregulate RUNX3 expression and upregulate Akt expression in SNU-407 cells. Cells were incubated with 100 μM H2O2 for up to 48 h. (A) Nuclear extracts prepared at the indicated times were electrophorised and the cell lysates were immunoblotted using an anti-RUNX3 antibody. TATA box-binding protein (TBP) was used as a loading control. (B) Confocal image showing the location of RUNX3 (green) in control SNU-407 cells and cells treated with H2O2. DAPI staining (blue) indicates the location of the nucleus and the merged image indicates the nuclear location of RUNX3 protein. (C) Cell proliferation was measured using a trypan blue assay. Cells were counted 0, 24, and 48 h after treatment of SNU-407 cells with H2O2. *Significantly different from cells without H202 treatment at day 0 (P<0.05); #significantly different from cells with H202 treatment at day 0 (P<0.05). (D) Immunoblot analysis of the levels of total Akt and phosphorylated Akt (Phospho-Akt) in cells treated with H2O2 for up to 48 h. β-actin was used as a loading control.
Downregulation of RUNX3 induces Akt protein expression. Immunoblot showing the expression levels of RUNX3, phosphorylated Akt (Phospho-Akt), and total Akt protein after SNU-407 cells were transiently transfected with control or RUNX3-specific siRNA. TBP and β-actin were used as loading controls.
ROS reverse RUNX3-mediated repression of Akt transcription. SNU-407 cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2 for 0, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h. (A) RT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of RUNX3 and Akt mRNAs following H2O2 treatment. Expression of GAPDH was measured as a loading control. (B and C) ChIP analysis of the interaction between RUNX3 and Akt was performed using an anti-RUNX3 antibody and primers targeting the Akt promoter region. The intensity of the bands indicates the level of RUNX3 protein bound to the RSB1 (B) and RSB2 (C) sites in the Akt promoter. As a negative control, immunoprecipitation was performed using IgG. Input represents amplification of total DNA from whole cell lysates.
ROS regulate the Akt1/β-catenin signaling pathway. (A) Immunoblot of SNU-407 cells treated with H2O2 for up to 48 h. The levels of β-catenin and phosphorylated GSK-3β (Phospho-GSK-3β) protein were increased following the oxidative stress-inducing treatment. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) Immunoblot of the expression of β-catenin in nuclear extracts from H2O2-treated cells. TBP was used as a loading control. (C) Representative images of β-catenin (green) expression in control cells and cells treated with H2O2. DAPI staining (blue) indicates the location of the nucleus and the merged image indicates the nuclear location of RUNX3 protein.
ROS regulate the induction of β-catenin-mediated cyclin D1 expression. Cells were treated with 100 μM H2O2 for 48 h. (A) ChIP analysis of the direct binding of β-catenin to the cyclin D1 promoter in SNU-407 cells. Immunoprecipitates were prepared using an anti-β-catenin antibody or IgG as a control and co-immunoprecipitated DNA was PCR-amplified using cyclin D1-specific primers. The expression of GAPDH was measured as a control. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the expression of cyclin D1 in cells treated with H2O2 for up to 48 h. Nuclear extracts were electrophoresed and the cell lysates were immunoblotted using an anti-cyclin D1 antibody or an anti-TBP antibody as a control.