Introduction
Ovarian cancer is the seventh leading cause of female cancer-related death globally (1). Although cisplatin and its platinum derivative therapies are effective in treating ovarian cancer, most patients exhibit resistance to this type of chemotherapy (2). It was reported that platinum with taxane was effective for ovarian cancer, but the side effects were relatively severe (3). There is thus an urgent need to develop new chemotherapeutic combinations to maximize clinical benefit while minimizing toxicity.
Emetine is a natural alkaloid derived from Psychotria ipecacuanha that strongly inhibits the synthesis of biomolecules (4). It has been widely used as an anti-amoebiasis drug since the early 1900s (5). Evidence of emetine’s effect against tumor cells first came to light in 1918 (6). Following several preclinical studies of its anticancer activity, phase I/II clinical trials using emetine were performed by the NCI in the mid-1970s (7–10). However, emetine as a single agent showed no clinical benefit with several side effects, such as cardiac damage. Since then, emetine has been found to induce apoptosis in various human leukemic cell lines (11–14) and a lung cancer cell line (15). Recently, emetine has been reported to regulate the alternative splicing of bcl-x in breast cancer MCF-7, prostate cancer PC-3, cervical cancer C33 and lung cancer A549 cell lines, with downregulation of anti-apoptotic bcl-xL mRNA and upregulation of pro-apoptotic bcl-xS mRNA (16).
To date, emetine has been indicated to enhance cisplatin-induced apoptosis in leukemia cells (17) and bladder cancer cells (18). However, the precise molecular mechanisms remain unclear. In the present study, we investigated the effect of emetine with or without cisplatin on the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3. We further clarified that downregulation of bcl-xL is responsible for the synergistic effects of emetine and cisplatin.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 was obtained as a cell line of the NCI-60 from the National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Program (NCI DTP, Bethesda, MD, USA). SKOV3 cells were maintained in DMEM (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% FBS (PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Austria), 4 mM glutamine (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), 100 U/ml penicillin (Meiji Seika Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque). Cell culture was incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Reagents
Cisplatin (Wako, Osaka, Japan), emetine (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and zVAD-fmk (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were dissolved in DMSO (Nacalai Tesque).
Cell growth assay
The number of viable cells was measured by a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were seeded at a density of 1,500 cells in each well of 96-well plates (Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). After culturing for 24 h, cells were treated with DMSO as a control or cisplatin at the indicated concentrations for 72 h. Then, kit reagent WST-8 was added to the medium and incubated for 4 h. The absorbance of the samples at 450 nm was measured using a multi-plate reader (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan).
Analyses of cell cycle and apoptosis
Cells were incubated with various agents for 24, 48 or 72 h, and then harvested by trypsinization. After centrifugation, the cells were suspended in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Nacalai Tesque), 150 mg/ml RNase A (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 25 mg/ml propidium iodide (Sigma). The stained cells were analyzed using FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson). The data were analyzed using Modifit LT software and CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson).
Protein isolation and western blot analysis
Cells were lysed with a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (Nacalai Tesque), 1% SDS (Nacalai Tesque), 1 mM DTT (Nacalai Tesque), 0.43 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF) (Wako) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque). The lysate was sonicated and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 20 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was then collected. Equal amounts of the protein extract were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The following were used as the primary antibody: rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibody bcl-x (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody cleaved-caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody caspase-7 (R&D Systems), mouse anti-human monoclonal antibody caspase-8 (Medical & Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan) and anti-β-actin (Sigma). The signals were detected with a Chemi-lumi One L (Nacalai Tesque) or an Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore).
Colony formation assay
SKOV3 cells were seeded at a density of 250 cells per well in 6-well plates. After incubation for 24 h, cells were treated with cisplatin at 20 μM with or without emetine at 2.5 μM. The medium was then replaced with a fresh one, and the cells were cultured for 10 days. The colonies fixed in 10% formaldehyde solution (Nacalai Tesque) were stained in crystal violet (Nacalai Tesque), and the number of viable colonies was counted.
Small interfering (si) RNA transfection
Knockdown of bcl-xL was achieved by transfection with small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), as previously reported (19), using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD of three determinations. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test. Samples were considered significantly different when P<0.05.
Results
Cisplatin inhibits cell growth with G2/M-phase arrest in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells
High resistance to cisplatin in many human ovarian cancer cell lines has been reported (20). Here, we investigated the effects of cisplatin on ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells. After treatment with the indicated concentrations of cisplatin for 72 h, cisplatin dose-dependently inhibited the cell growth (Fig. 1A). We then performed cell cycle analysis and measured the sub-G1 population to quantify apoptotic cells. The treatment with cisplatin at 5 μM or more for 72 h increased the G2/M phase in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B), but barely induced apoptosis (Fig. 1C). These results clearly show that cisplatin inhibited the growth of human ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells with G2/M-phase arrest.
Emetine reduces anti-apoptotic bcl-xL expression with slight induction of apoptosis
Among anti-apoptotic members, bcl-xL expression is frequently upregulated during carcinogenesis (21), and is associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in malignant tumors of various origins (22–25). In this study, we found that treatment of emetine at 2.5 or 5 μM for 72 h decreased the protein expression of bcl-xL (Fig. 2A) in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells, whereas treatment of 2.5 μM emetine for 24 h did not reduce the expression of bcl-xL (Fig. 2B). As described, emetine at 2.5 or 5 μM effectively downregulated the anti-apoptotic bcl-xL protein expression (Fig. 2A), but it could induce only weak apoptosis (Fig. 2C).
Combination treatment with cisplatin and emetine time-dependently induce caspase-dependent apoptosis
We next investigated whether emetine sensitized SKOV3 cells to cisplatin. As shown in Fig. 3A, co-treatment with 20 μM cisplatin and 2.5 or 5 μM emetine significantly induced apoptosis in SKOV3 cells. The time-dependence of apoptosis induced by the combination of cisplatin and emetine is shown in Fig. 3B. Combined treatment for 24 h did not induce increased apoptosis. However, co-treatment with cisplatin and emetine for 48 and 72 h apparently increased it. These results are in accordance with the data shown in Fig. 2B that emetine at 2.5 μM for 24 h did not reduce the expression of bcl-xL, but it was decreased by the treatment for 48 and 72 h. To investigate whether apoptosis was caspase-dependent, we analyzed the effect of a pan-caspase inhibitor, zVAD-fmk. Apoptosis induced by the combination was partially inhibited by this inhibitor (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the combination clearly enhanced the activation of caspases with reduction of bcl-xL expression (Fig. 3C).
Combination treatment with cisplatin and emetine decreases colony formation
We then performed a colony formation assay to investigate the effect of the combined treatment with cisplatin and emetine. Cisplatin at 20 μM or emetine at 2.5 μM reduced the colony number to 58 and 47%, respectively, whereas combined treatment with 20 μM cisplatin and 2.5 μM emetine markedly decreased it to 17% (Fig. 4). These results indicate that emetine could sensitize SKOV3 cells to cisplatin.
Downregulation of bcl-xL enhances apoptosis induced by cisplatin
To confirm the contribution of the downregulation of bcl-xL by emetine to the enhancement of apoptosis induced by cisplatin, we performed the knockdown of bcl-xL by siRNA. As shown in Fig. 5A, knockdown of bcl-xL markedly enhanced the apoptosis by cisplatin in SKOV3 cells. Moreover, the knockdown of bcl-xL caused the cleavage of caspases (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that the downregulation of bcl-xL expression contributed to the enhancement of apoptosis by the combination of cisplatin and emetine.
Discussion
One of the major goals of cancer chemotherapy is to induce apoptosis in tumor cells by exposure to antitumor agents. Although cisplatin is a potent inducer of apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells, the resistant tumor cells have been found to fail to undergo apoptosis upon treatment with cisplatin (26–28). We demonstrated here that cisplatin inhibited cell growth with G2/M-phase arrest but slightly increased apoptosis in ovarian carcinoma SKOV3 cells (Fig. 1). To enhance the sensitivity, the identification of new agents that can sensitize SKOV3 cells to apoptosis induced by cisplatin appears as a major challenge. In the present study, we found that co-treatment of cisplatin and emetine remarkably induced apoptosis and reduced colony formation of SKOV3 cells (Figs. 3 and 4). It is interesting that emetine, which was used as an anti-amoebiasis drug ~100 years ago, could sensitize SKOV3 cells to apoptosis induced by cisplatin.
There are several reports describing that bcl-xL expression contributed to chemotherapy resistance in ovarian carcinoma by inhibiting chemotherapy-induced apoptosis (29–31). Therefore, downregulation of bcl-xL is reasonable for sensitizing ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy. We found that emetine could reduce the expression of bcl-xL in SKOV3 cells for the first time (Fig. 2A and B). However, the reduction of bcl-xL expression by emetine alone was insufficient to enhance apoptosis in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 2C). We speculated that emetine might sensitize SKOV3 cells to apoptosis induced by cisplatin through the downregulation of bcl-xL. The present experiments showed that single treatment of cisplatin did not reduce the expression of bcl-xL, but co-treatment of cisplatin and emetine did, which led to the induction of apoptosis with activated caspases (Fig. 3). Moreover, the knockdown of bcl-xL with siRNA enhanced the sensitivity to cisplatin of SKOV3 cells (Fig. 5), which was consistent with the results for the combination of cisplatin and emetine (Figs. 3 and 4). Taken together, these studies indicate that emetine as a downregulator of bcl-xL might be a promising agent to sensitize ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin.
Previously it was reported that emetine sensitizes leukemic cancer cells and bladder cancer cells to chemotherapy (17,18). However, the precise molecular mechanisms by which emetine improves the sensitivity of cancer cells remain unclear. Recent studies reported that emetine enhanced the sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by downregulating mcl-1 protein (32); the authors suggested that emetine was highly specific to TRAIL since it did not have any effect on other cell death-inducing agents, such as thapsigargin, daunorubicin and paclitaxel (32). However, our study, we found that emetine sensitized ovarian carcinoma cells to cisplatin through downregulation of bcl-xL. These studies suggest that the functions of emetine as a sensitizer for chemotherapeutic agents might vary depending on the cancer cell type. Therefore, the mechanisms for emetine’s involvement in the enhancement of the sensitivity of cancer cells require further investigation.
In conclusion, we found that emetine sensitizes ovarian carcinoma SKOV3 cells, which were initially resistant to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. We demonstrated, for the first time, that the downregulation of bcl-xL by emetine is a key factor in sensitizing SKOV3 cells to cisplatin. The combination of cisplatin with emetine might be worth developing as a possible treatment for ovarian cancer. Furthermore, the use of emetine in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents for other cancer cells remains an interesting topic for further studies.