<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Oncology</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1019-6439</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-2423</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ijo.2015.3188</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijo-47-06-2153</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Targeting the &#x00394;133p53 isoform can restore chemosensitivity in 5-fluorouracil-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cells</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>NUTTHASIRIKUL</surname><given-names>NICHAPAVEE</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HAHNVAJANAWONG</surname><given-names>CHARIYA</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref><xref rid="af3-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>TECHASEN</surname><given-names>ANCHALEE</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>LIMPAIBOON</surname><given-names>TEMDUANG</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>LEELAYUWAT</surname><given-names>CHANVIT</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>CHAU-IN</surname><given-names>SIRI</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref><xref rid="af4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>JEARANAIKOON</surname><given-names>PATCHAREE</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="aff">2</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijo-47-06-2153"/></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>1</label>Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>2</label>Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand</aff>
<aff id="af3-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>3</label>Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand</aff>
<aff id="af4-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>4</label>Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijo-47-06-2153">Correspondence to: Dr Patcharee Jearanaikoon, Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand, E-mail: <email>patjea@kku.ac.th</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>12</month>
<year>2015</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>05</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2015</year></pub-date>
<volume>47</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>2153</fpage>
<lpage>2164</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2015</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>17</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2015</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000A9; Nutthasirikul et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Lack of the normal p53 transactivation domain, &#x00394;133p53 isoform exhibits anti-p53 function. Many studies report the correlation between &#x00394;133p53 expression and poor survival in various cancers, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which is a cancer of the bile ducts. CCA almost always results in short survival times. The relevance of &#x00394;133p53 to drug resistance in CCA is not yet well understood. This study aimed to demonstrate the association between &#x00394;133p53 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in CCA. &#x00394;133p53 protein was highly expressed in CCA patients with poor outcome compared to favorable outcome but was not statistically significant. However, a significant correlation was found between normalized &#x00394;133p53 levels and 5-FU resistance which was defined by an <italic>ex vivo</italic> histoculture drug response assay (P=0.019). Two stable 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines, KKU-M139R (IC<sub>50</sub> 38.8 &#x003BC;M) and KKU-M214R (IC<sub>50</sub> 39.5 &#x003BC;M), were used as a model to evaluate the role of &#x00394;133p53. Increased &#x00394;133p53 was correlated with 5-FU in a dose-dependent manner. The transient knockdown of &#x00394;133p53 expression can restore drug sensitivity in both resistant CCA cells with 11- to 45-fold reduction of IC<sub>50</sub> compared to control. Upon &#x00394;133p53 silencing, apoptotic signaling was enhanced by the upregulation of Bax and downregulation of Bcl-2. Additionally, p21 and p27 were upregulated, resulting in cell cycle arrest at G2. Inhibition of colony formation and prolong doubling time were also observed. Our findings demonstrated that chemosensitivity can be modulated via targeting of &#x00394;133p53 suggesting the potential use of &#x00394;133p53 as a candidate for targeting therapy in CCA.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>p53 isoform</kwd>
<kwd>drug resistance</kwd>
<kwd>cholangiocarcinoma</kwd>
<kwd>reversed chemosensitivity</kwd>
<kwd>apoptosis</kwd>
<kwd>&#x00394;133p53</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a cancer arising from bile duct epithelium. The highest prevalence of CCA in the world has been reported in the northeastern regions of Thailand, where liver fluke infection is highly endemic (<xref rid="b1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b3-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). The etiology of the disease is related to chronic biliary inflammation caused by the consumption of raw or undercooked fish that is infected with the liver fluke <italic>Opisthorchis viverrini</italic>, together with foods containing N-nitroso compounds (<xref rid="b4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). Only CCA patients with early stage disease are curable by surgical treatment (<xref rid="b6-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). However, the early stage disease is asymptomatic and difficult to diagnose. Treatment for advance stage CCA is rather unsuccessful. Most CCA patients have different chemotherapeutic responses even at the same stage, leading to poor clinical outcomes with short survival times of ~5&#x02013;7 months (<xref rid="b7-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is recommended in low resource countries as the first line drug of choice for the treatment of a variety of solid tumors including CCA (<xref rid="b8-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). However, 5-FU is rather ineffective treatment for CCA, with a response rate &lt;10&#x00025; (<xref rid="b9-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Several reports have noted the effectiveness of other anticancer drugs in CCA such as cisplatin (<xref rid="b10-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b11-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>), doxorubicin (<xref rid="b10-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>) and gemcitabine (<xref rid="b12-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). Unfortunately, the survival time was not significantly improved which was ~6&#x02013;9 months (<xref rid="b9-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Therefore, the use of drug combinations rather than single drug has been proposed for obtaining better response in CCA. A response rate of &#x02264;40&#x00025; was obtained with the triple combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and 5-FU (<xref rid="b13-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). However, using more anticancer drugs may produce additional adverse effects and acquired drug resistance in patients.</p>
<p>5-FU is an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase leading to inhibition of RNA and DNA synthesis of tumor cells. DNA damage can trigger the induction of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, resulting in tumor cell death (<xref rid="b14-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Although downregulation of <italic>p53</italic> mRNA, a <italic>p73</italic> family member, has been reported in 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines by Namwat <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b16-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>) no information regarding <italic>p53</italic> role in 5-FU-resistant CCA cells has been reported. The <italic>p53</italic> gene contains two alternative promoters (P1 and P2). The P1 promoter generates the full-length TAp53 and &#x00394;40p53, a 40 amino acids deleted p53 variant via alternative splicing and initiation of translation within intron 2 (<xref rid="b17-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). The assembly of full-length p53 molecules as a tetramer leads to normal function as a transcription factor. The P2 promoter encodes larger amino-terminal truncated proteins (133 and 160 deleted amino acids), &#x00394;133p53 (<xref rid="b17-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>) and &#x00394;160p53 (<xref rid="b18-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>), which exhibit anti-apoptotic properties when oligomerized with TAp53 resulting in loss of the transactivation function. The N-terminal deleted p53 protein variant (&#x00394;Np53) has been reported to disrupt wild-type p53 function (<xref rid="b19-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). Hence, the control of promoter usage in p53 is proposed as an auto-regulation mechanism for p53 functions (<xref rid="b20-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>). In addition to the &#x00394;Np53 isoforms, three alternate isoforms of p53; &#x003B1;, &#x003B2; and &#x003B3; at the carboxyl terminal are encoded by alternative splicing. A full-length p53 or TAp53&#x003B1; is encoded from the normal splice site, whereas TAp53&#x003B2; and TAp53&#x003B3; are encoded from two different alternative splicing sites of intron 9 at carboxyl end (<xref rid="b17-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). To date, any impact of &#x003B2; and &#x003B3; isoforms on tumor suppressor activities remains unclear. An increase in <italic>&#x00394;133p53</italic> expression has also been reported in renal cell (<xref rid="b21-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>), acute myeloid leukemia (<xref rid="b22-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>), ovarian cancer (<xref rid="b23-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>), breast (<xref rid="b17-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>), head and neck (<xref rid="b24-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>), melanoma (<xref rid="b25-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>), colon cancer (<xref rid="b19-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). The correlation between &#x00394;133p53 and tumor progression has been found in colon carcinomas (<xref rid="b19-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). Our previous study also found the relationship between overexpression of defective p53 (mutant p53 and <italic>&#x00394;133p53</italic>) with poor prognosis in CCA (<xref rid="b26-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). Upregulation of <italic>&#x00394;133p53</italic> mRNA level and ratio disruption of the p53 isoforms encoded from P2/P1 (<italic>&#x00394;133p53/TAp53</italic>) was correlated with poor survival outcome of CCA patients. The major factors affecting the patients survival outcome may be the contribution from drug resistance. Reports of &#x00394;133p53 effects on drug resistance are few. Recently, upregulation of &#x00394;133p53&#x003B1; in response to a low dose of doxorubicin has been noted in osteosarcoma and colon cancer cell lines (<xref rid="b27-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). However, the role of &#x00394;133p53 isoforms in drug resistance in CCA remains unclear.</p>
<p>This study attempts to demonstrate the association between &#x00394;133p53 overexpression and chemoresistance in CCA. 5-FU sensitivity in clinical tissues of CCA was classified using an <italic>ex vivo</italic> histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) and clinical treatment outcome. Two 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines were established in this study and used as a model to evaluate the role of &#x00394;133p53 isoform in chemosensitivity.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Clinical samples</title>
<p>A total of 22 tumor samples and 10 normal adjacent tissues were collected from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients who were admitted to Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. The project was approved by the Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee in human research (HE571044). All patients gave written informed consent. Fresh tumor tissues were tested for Histoculture Drug Response Assay. Paralleled tissues were kept under liquid nitrogen until used for protein extraction.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Histoculture drug response assay (HDRA)</title>
<p>Tumor tissues were classified as 5-FU sensitive and 5-FU resistant based on results obtained from an <italic>ex vivo</italic> histoculture drug response assay (HDRA), using the median of inhibition index (&#x00025; II) as previously described (<xref rid="b28-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>). In brief, fresh tumor tissues were washed and a 3-mm diameter punch was used aseptically to take samples that were placed on collagen gel sponges. Each was cultured at 37&#x000BA;C in a 6-well plate containing RPMI medium supplemented with 2.5&#x00025; v/v penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone (PSF; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 5-FU at 200 &#x003BC;M. For a control sample, no 5-FU was added in the culture medium. After 4 days of culture, the viability of tumor cells in the cultured tissues was examined using TUNEL staining. TUNEL-positive cells were identified as dead cells. The efficacy of 5-FU was calculated and expressed as the &#x00025; II using the following formula: &#x00025; II = (1 &#x02212; &#x00025; viable tumor cells in 5-FU-treated tumor tissue/&#x00025; living tumor cells in control tissue) &#x000D7; 100.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>CCA cell lines and cell culture</title>
<p>Two CCA cell lines, KKU-M139 and KKU-M214 were established from primary tumors of human intrahepatic CCA at the Liver Fluke and Cholangiocarcinoma Research Center, Khon Kaen University Thailand (<xref rid="b16-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b29-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>,<xref rid="b30-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). Both were cultured at 37&#x000BA;C in RPMI medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10&#x00025; fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1&#x00025; v/v penicillin-streptomycin solution (Gibco, BRL) under 5&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere. These CCA cells were named as KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P, to identify the parental cell lines at the beginning of drug resistance induction.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Establishment of 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines</title>
<p>5-FU-resistant cell lines were generated from the parental cell lines KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P by stepwise increases of the concentration of 5-FU (Boryung Pharm, Korea) as described previously (<xref rid="b16-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). In brief, 1&#x000D7;10<sup>5</sup> cells were seeded in 25-cm<sup>2</sup> flasks and cultured without 5-FU for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were exposed with 5-FU at 6 &#x003BC;M for KKU-M139 (1X IC<sub>50</sub> value of KKU-M139P) and 4 &#x003BC;M for KKU-M214 (1X IC<sub>50</sub> value of KKU-M214P) for 72 h. Cells were then cultured in a drug-free medium until they reached 70&#x00025; confluence. These cells were continuously maintained in 1X IC<sub>50</sub> for several passages until these cells were stable before being subjected into 2X IC<sub>50</sub>. The 5-FU-resistant clones were finally obtained after continuous selection by several passages for 18 months. The IC<sub>50</sub> of the resistant clones was checked by the SRB assay (<xref rid="b31-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). The resistant clones were then passaged into a drug-free medium for 2 weeks before being stored as a stock of the resistant cell lines (KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R) at &#x02212;80&#x000BA;C. KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R were cultured in 5-FU-free medium for &#x02265;2 weeks to eliminate potential long-term effects of 5-FU unrelated to drug resistance prior to being performed in all experiments.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Transient silencing of &#x00394;133p53 by siRNA</title>
<p>Expression of &#x00394;133p53 in KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cells was suppressed using a siRNA technique. The sequences of two specific siRNA targeting human &#x00394;133p53 (&#x00394;133p53a and &#x00394;133p53b) as described previously (<xref rid="b18-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>), were purchased from Ambion (Austin, TX, USA). The cells (2&#x000D7;10<sup>6</sup> cells/well) were seeded in a 6-well plate and cultured overnight before being transfected separately with 100 pM of si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b, while siGFP (Green fluorescence protein, Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a siRNA control. Transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 24 h of transfection, culture medium was added and the plates were incubated at 37&#x000BA;C for a further 48 h. At 72 h-post transfection, total proteins were extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The level of &#x00394;133p53 protein was determined by western blot analysis using &#x003B2;-actin as a loading control.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Measurement of IC<sub>50</sub> by Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays</title>
<p>The parental CCA cells (KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P) and the 5-FU-resistant cells (KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R) were seeded at 1&#x000D7;10<sup>4</sup> cells/well in triplicate into a 96-well culture plate and incubated at 37&#x000BA;C for 24 h. All cell lines were then treated with various concentrations of 5-FU ranging from 2&#x02013;128 &#x003BC;M in triplicate for 72 h, while 0.9&#x00025; saline was used as a negative control. The cytotoxicity was performed using a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay as previously described (<xref rid="b31-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). The cells were fixed using a 10&#x00025; cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA), washed and air-dried at room temperature. SRB (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) solution (100 &#x003BC;l/well) was added and followed by three quick rinses with 1&#x00025; acetic acid to remove unbound dye. SRB was solubilized in a 10 mM Tris base solution and the absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Tecan Ltd., Reading, UK). Percentage of cell viability was calculated &#x0005B;(mean OD<sub>sample</sub> &#x02212; mean OD<sub>day0/</sub>mean OD<sub>negative control</sub> &#x02212; mean OD<sub>day0</sub>) &#x000D7; 100&#x0005D; and used to generate the curve by which IC<sub>50</sub> was calculated. Resistance index was defined as a ratio of the IC<sub>50</sub> value of drug resistant cells to parental cells.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Population doubling time (PDT)</title>
<p>To assess cell growth, the population doubling time (PDT) of the cells was assessed in triplicate. Cells (2&#x000D7;10<sup>5</sup>) were cultured in a drug free medium supplemented with 10&#x00025; FBS at 37&#x000BA;C in a humidified 5&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere. When reaching 70&#x00025; confluence, the cells were trypsinized, stained with trypan blue and counted on a hemocytometer. PDT was calculated using the following formula as described previously (<xref rid="b32-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>): (T-T<sub>0</sub>) log2/logN-logN<sub>0</sub>, where N<sub>0</sub> is the initial cell number, N is the final cell number, T is the time interval between N<sub>0</sub> and N, and T<sub>0</sub> is the initial time.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Colony forming assay</title>
<p>KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cells were pre-treated with either si&#x00394;133p53 or siRNA control. The cells were seeded at 200 cells/well in a 6-well plate containing 2 ml RPMI culture medium supplemented with 10&#x00025; v/v FBS and cultured at 37&#x000BA;C in a humidified 5&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere for 5 days. The cells were washed twice with PBS, stained with H&amp;E and the colonies were counted.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Analysis of apoptosis by Annexin V/PI staining</title>
<p>The analysis of Annexin V binding was carried out with the Annexin V-FITC Detection Kit I (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were incubated with or without si&#x00394;133p53 or a control scramble RNA for 48 h. Cells were collected, washed twice with cold PBS, centrifuged at 1,800 rpm for 3 min, and resuspended in 1X binding buffer at a concentration of 10<sup>6</sup> cells/ml. Then 100 &#x003BC;l of the solution (10<sup>5</sup> cells) was transferred to a 5-ml culture tube; 5 &#x003BC;l of Annexin V-FITC and 5 &#x003BC;l of PI were added. Cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Furthermore, 200 &#x003BC;l of 1X binding buffer were added to each tube, and samples were analyzed by FACScan flow cytometry (BD FACSCanto II; BD, USA). For each sample, 10,000 ungated events were acquired. Annexin V<sup>+</sup>/PI<sup>&#x02212;</sup> cells represented the early apoptotic populations, and Annexin V<sup>+</sup>/PI<sup>+</sup> cells the late apoptotic populations.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry</title>
<p>KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cells (10<sup>5</sup> cells/ml) were incubated with or without si&#x00394;133p53 or a siRNA control for 48 h. The cells were collected, washed with cold PBS, fixed in cold 100&#x00025; ethanol, treated with DNase-free RNase, and stained with 40 &#x003BC;g/ml of propidium iodide (PI). The distribution of the cells between phases of the cell cycle was deduced from the DNA content on a FACScan flow cytometer (BD FACSCanto II; BD, USA). For each sample, 10,000 gated events were acquired.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Western blot analyses</title>
<p>Protein was extracted from CCA tissues and cell lines using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and 40 &#x003BC;g aliquots were fractionated on 15&#x00025; polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Primary antibodies; CM-1 (1:100, Signet, Emeryville, CA, USA), p21 (1:400), p27 (1:400), Bcl-2 (1:200), Bax (1:200), and p73 (ab-4) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) as well as a loading control, &#x003B2;-actin (1:4,000, Sigma Chemical Co.) were used followed by the secondary antibody peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit (1:10,000, Abcam, UK) The proteins were detected by chemiluminescence using the ECL Plus system (GE Healthcare, UK). Protein band intensity was calculated by Scion image program, and normalized to &#x003B2;-actin.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Immunocytochemical staining of p53</title>
<p>The paraffin-embedded sections (5 &#x003BC;m) of CCA cell pellets fixed with 10&#x00025; formalin solution were deparaffinized. Antigen retrieval was performed in boiling 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) as described previously (<xref rid="b26-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated with 100 &#x003BC;l of 3&#x00025; H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Non-specific binding was further treated with a blocking buffer containing phosphate-buffered saline with Tween-20 (PBS-T), 30&#x00025; casein and 5&#x00025; FBS. For p53 protein detection, mutant p53 was detected with the primary antibody clone DO-7, 1:100 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), which recognizes an epitope between amino acids 1&#x02013;45 of human p53. The slides were incubated overnight at room temperature with primary antibody. Proteins were detected using the EnVision system (Dako) for 1 h at room temperature. Color was developed with DAB solution (Dako) and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. Positive staining was observed as brown color in blue/gray nuclei. Positive with DO-7 antibody indicates overexpression of the mutated p53 due to its stability (<xref rid="b26-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>,<xref rid="b33-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b35-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 15 (SPSS, Inc., IL, USA). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of two groups. Data are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences are indicated in the figures as <sup>*</sup>P&lt;0.05, <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Assessment of 5-FU sensitivity in CCA samples</title>
<p>5-FU sensitivity in 22 CCA patients was classified based on the results obtained from histoculture drug response assays (HDRA) and treatment outcome data. For the HDRA-based classification, we used the median of the &#x00025; inhibition index (&#x00025; II) which was 36.5&#x00025; and this identified 11 patients as 5-FU-sensitive and 11 as 5-FU-resistant. Only 12 of 22 CCA patients underwent complete course of chemotherapy. The treatment outcome was further followed up every 6 months for &#x02265;12 months. Poor response (n=7) and favorable response (n=5) were defined in terms of having tumor progression before and after 6 months after treatment, respectively. All clinical data are summarized in <xref rid="tI-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Levels of the &#x00394;Np53 isoform are increased significantly in 5-FU-resistant CCA samples</title>
<p>Western blot analysis of 22 tumors and 10 normal paired tissues using CM-1 antibody revealed the presence of various p53 isoforms (<xref rid="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). At least 3 isoforms; TAp53, &#x00394;40p53 and &#x00394;133p53 were observed in tumor tissues, in which two different sizes of &#x00394;133p53 at 35 kDa corresponding to &#x00394;133p53&#x003B1; and 28 kDa to &#x00394;133p53&#x003B2;, &#x003B3; were defined (<xref rid="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>). Interestingly, no &#x00394;133p53 isoform was observed in the normal tissues (<xref rid="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>). The box-plot analysis of &#x00394;133p53 protein expression normalized to &#x003B2;-actin and 5-FU sensitivity classified by HDRA showed significantly increased &#x00394;133p53 in 5-FU-resistant cases compared to sensitive ones (P=0.019) (<xref rid="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1B</xref>). It seemed that &#x00394;133p53 protein was highly expressed in CCA patients with poor outcome compared to CCA cases with favorable outcome but was not statistically significant (P=0.264) (<xref rid="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Characteristics of 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines</title>
<p>Two resistant CCA cell lines; KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R were successfully induced from the parental cells; KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P. Drug toxicity is presented in <xref rid="f2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>. The IC<sub>50</sub> values of 5-FU in KKU-M139P, KKU-M139R, KKU-M214P and KKU-M214R cells were 6.2&#x000B1;2.09, 38.8 &#x000B1;7.11, 3.9&#x000B1;2.04 and 39.5&#x000B1;3.45 &#x003BC;M, respectively. The resistance index calculated from the ratio of IC<sub>50</sub> of resistant to parental CCA cell lines was 6.26 and 10.12 for KKU-M139 and KKU-M214, respectively. Furthermore, population doubling times of both resistant cell lines were shorter than those of parental cell lines as summarized in <xref rid="tII-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Upregulation of the &#x00394;133p53 isoform induced by 5-FU</title>
<p>The expression of p53 isoforms was assessed in both parental and resistant CCA cell lines in response to 5-FU concentration covering their IC<sub>50</sub> values. When challenged with 5-FU with 5 and 10 &#x003BC;M, TAp53, &#x00394;40p53 and &#x00394;133p53 protein isoforms were markedly increased in both parental cell lines (KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P) in a dose-dependent manner (<xref rid="f3-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>). This finding indicates the increased usage of both P1 and P2 promoters under 5-FU stress. In contrast to parental cells, only &#x00394;133p53 protein was upregulated in both resistant cell lines (KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R) induced by 5-FU (<xref rid="f3-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>) suggesting the enhancement of P2 promoter usage. Upon 5-FU challenge with 20 and 50 &#x003BC;M, KKU-M214R showed rapid response to 5-FU in which the upregulation of &#x00394;133p53 was detected at a lower dose (20 &#x003BC;M of 5-FU) compared to KKU-M139R (50 &#x003BC;M of 5-FU).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Silencing of &#x00394;133p53 promotes apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in 5-FU resistant CCA cells</title>
<p>Silencing of &#x00394;133p53 in both KKU-M214R and KKU-M139R was used to investigate the role of &#x00394;133p53 in 5-FU-resistant CCA cells. The expression of &#x00394;133p53 was successfully suppressed with both si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b compared to the siRNA control (<xref rid="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A and B</xref>) with normal apparent morphology (<xref rid="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4C</xref>). The effect of silenced &#x00394;133p53 on apoptotic and cell cycle markers in KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R was investigated. The suppression of &#x00394;133p53 protein resulted in significant upregulation of Bax expression in both KKU-M214R and KKU-M139R (P&lt;0.01) as well as downregulation of Bcl-2 in KKU-M214R (P&lt;0.001) and KKU-M139R (P&lt;0.01) (<xref rid="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4D</xref>). Accordingly, Annexin V/PI staining showed significantly increased cell apoptosis in the silenced si&#x00394;133p53 of both KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R (si&#x00394;133p53a at P&lt;0.01 and si&#x00394;133p53b at P&lt;0.001, respectively) compared with control (<xref rid="f5-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5</xref>).</p>
<p>Additionally p21 and p27 proteins were significantly upregulated with P&lt;0.01 and P&lt;0.001 in M139R and KKU-M214R compared to the siRNA control (<xref rid="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A and 4D</xref>). Moreover, cells were significantly arrested at G2 in both si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b treated KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R compared to the siRNA controls (<xref rid="f6-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>). Interestingly, significant upregulation of p73 was observed in both types of silenced CCA cells (<xref rid="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A and D</xref>). Moreover, no mutated p53 was revealed in si&#x00394;133p53 treated (KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R) or siRNA control compared to their parental cells (KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P) using immunostaining with DO-7 (<xref rid="f7-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 7</xref>). These results imply that the induced p73 protein might help mediating apoptosis upon the absence of wild-type TAp53 (<xref rid="f3-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>) and mutated p53 (<xref rid="f7-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 7</xref>). Moreover, the induced cell cycle arrest by &#x00394;133p53 silencing leads to growth retardation, as shown by the prolonged PDT (<xref rid="f8-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 8A</xref>) and the inhibition of colony forming capability (<xref rid="f8-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="fig">Fig. 8B</xref>). Hence, suppression of &#x00394;133p53 expression affects certain tumor characteristics of these CCA resistant cells.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Attenuation of &#x00394;133p53 levels enhances the chemosensitivity of 5-FU-resistant CCA cells</title>
<p>The chemosensitivity of KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cells transfected with si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b was re-assessed using an SRB assay of cell numbers (<xref rid="tIII-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>). Strikingly, the IC<sub>50</sub> of KKU-M139R-si&#x00394;133p53a and KKU-M139R-&#x00394;133p53b cells to 5-FU was decreased 12- and 45-fold, as compared with the IC<sub>50</sub> of the siRNA control cells. Similar effects were also observed in KKU-M214R with 11- and 20-fold decreases, respectively. The IC<sub>50</sub> of silenced CCA cells was lower than those of parental cells suggesting that silencing of &#x00394;133p53 can re-sensitize 5-FU resistance in CCA cell lines.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>A variety of &#x00394;Np53 isoforms generated from both P1 and P2 promoters were reported in clinical tumors, however, limited evidence of chemoresistance has been noted. This study is the first to demonstrate the correlation between high levels of &#x00394;133p53 expression in clinical CCA tissues with 5-FU resistant based HDRA. A limited sample sizing, resulting from an incomplete treatment, affected the statistical testing for correlation in clinical treatment. Even though &#x00394;133p53 expression showed no significant correlation with clinical treatment outcome, &#x00394;133p53 level seemed to increase in patients with poor response to treatment. This result suggested that &#x00394;133p53 might be involved on drug responsiveness. Aoubala <italic>et al</italic> reported the upregulation of &#x00394;133p53&#x003B1; with response to a low dose of doxorubicin in osteosarcoma and colon cancer (<xref rid="b27-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). However, p53 function can be inactivated by either mutation or &#x00394;133p53 overexpression, thus, the mutant p53 should also be considered in clinical CCA. The incidence of p53 mutation has been reported in clinical CCA samples as up to 41&#x02013;44&#x00025; (<xref rid="b26-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>,<xref rid="b36-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). Defective p53 due to mutation has been reported with drug resistance to 5-FU-based therapy in colorectal cancer (<xref rid="b37-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b39-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>). A correlation between <italic>p53</italic> mutation and platinum-based chemotherapy resistance, early relapse, and shortened overall survival was reported in ovarian cancer patients (<xref rid="b40-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>). Of note, the incidence of &#x00394;Np53 overexpression without mutant p53 in CCA has been previously found at 54&#x00025; (<xref rid="b26-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). Therefore, the 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R were used as an <italic>in vitro</italic> model to address the impact of &#x00394;133p53 on 5-FU resistance without the influence of p53 mutation. These 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines contain only &#x00394;133p53 protein without the full length p53 (TAp53) or the mutated p53 as shown by negative western blotting with CM-1 and negative DO-7 staining. The IC<sub>50</sub> of 5-FU resistance remained stable even cultured in drug free medium for &#x02265;4 weeks, supporting the claim for stable resistant clone.</p>
<p>For both parental CCA cell lines, 5-FU can enhance the upregulation of both TAp53 and &#x00394;133p53 in a dose-dependent manner. The enhancement of both P1 and P2 promoter usage might provide an advantage of apoptosis evasion via p53 inactivation which enabling an acquired 5-FU resistance upon drug exposure. Similar finding of &#x00394;133p53 upregulation in response to 5-FU was revealed in both resistant cells except TAp53 existence. The enhancement of P2 promoter regardless of TAp53 may result from continuous selective pressure upon induction of 5-FU resistance. The rapid response to lower dose of 5-FU found in KKU-M214R, may explain the higher resistance index of KKU-M214R (10.12-fold) than that of KKU-M139R (6.26-fold). Targeting of &#x00394;133p53 in 5-FU resistant cells by siRNA is therefore verified the role of &#x00394;133p53 on chemoresistance in these 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines which was successfully obtained by both si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b with 75&#x02013;90&#x00025; suppression. Interestingly, the targeting of &#x00394;133p53 helps restoring the 5-FU sensitivity with markedly reduced IC<sub>50</sub> compared to that of parental cells. The molecular underlying mechanism of 5-FU resensitization can be explained by an increase of cell apoptosis via an upregulation of pro-apoptotic BAX and downregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2. Moreover, G2 arrest was induced by upregulation of p21 and p27 in comparison with siRNA control cells. This evidence is relevant to the antitumor activity of 5-FU which is known to be involved in the induction of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (<xref rid="b37-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>,<xref rid="b39-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>,<xref rid="b41-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>).</p>
<p>Regardless of TAp53, the suppressed &#x00394;133p53 can explain only the withdrawal of p53 inactivation, but is unable to provide clues for p53 activation. The increase of p73 expression observed by western blotting in both types of silenced &#x00394;133p53 CCA cells might be responsible for p53 function restoration. <italic>p73</italic>, as a <italic>p53</italic> family member, has been shown to possess the capability to restore p53 function via p21 activation in a neuroblastoma cell line (<xref rid="b42-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>). The p73 protein can activate upstream transcriptional regulation of p21 and p27, resulting in cell cycle arrest in G2 (<xref rid="b43-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">43</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b45-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">45</xref>). In human lung adenocarcinoma, <italic>p73</italic> overexpression can enhance chemosensitivity by apoptosis induction (<xref rid="b46-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">46</xref>,<xref rid="b47-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">47</xref>). Namwat <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b16-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>), reported the association between downregulation of <italic>TAp73</italic> mRNA and 5-FU-resistant CCA cell lines. Evasion of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest are evident as a common mechanism of 5-FU resistance in various cancers such as colorectal cancer (<xref rid="b48-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">48</xref>), breast cancer (<xref rid="b49-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">49</xref>), and CCA (<xref rid="b16-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b29-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). Recently, evasion of both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathway has been reported in gemcitabine-resistant CCA cell lines (<xref rid="b32-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). Thus, &#x00394;133p53 may exert a signature of chemoresistant cells to evade p53-dependent cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.</p>
<p>Collectively, the silencing of &#x00394;133p53 and increased <italic>p73</italic> expression may modulate the chemosensitivity of 5-FU resistance in CCA cell lines. Low incidence of <italic>p73</italic> mutation has been reported in CCA (<xref rid="b50-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">50</xref>), downregulation via <italic>p73</italic> methylation has been frequently found in various cancers (<xref rid="b51-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">51</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b54-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">54</xref>) including CCA (<xref rid="b55-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="bibr">55</xref>). Data on the alteration of <italic>p73</italic> for chemo-resistance in CCA is still limited. The status of <italic>p73</italic> should be investigated in further study.</p>
<p>In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate the important role of &#x00394;133p53 in 5-FU resistance in CCA. The attenuation of p53 by molecular targeting of &#x00394;133p53 may modulate the chemosensitivity in CCA, hence the potential for use of &#x00394;133p53 as a candidate for targeted therapy.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>This study was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission, through the Health Cluster (SHeP-GMS), Khon Kaen University (Grant no. H-2553-Ph.D-06); the Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vatanasapt</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Sriamporn</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vatanasapt</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cancer control in Thailand</article-title><source>Jpn J Clin Oncol</source><volume>32</volume><issue>Suppl</issue><fpage>S82</fpage><lpage>S91</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jjco/hye134</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11959881</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sriamporn</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pisani</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Pipitgool</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Suwanrungruang</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamsa-ard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Parkin</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prevalence of Opisthorchisviverrini infection and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand</article-title><source>Trop Med Int Health</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>588</fpage><lpage>594</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01234.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15117303</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Worldwide trends in mortality from biliary tract malignancies</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>10</fpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-2-10</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11991810</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">113759</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thamavit</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhamarapravati</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahaphong</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vajrasthira</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Angsubhakorn</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of dimethylnitrosamine on induction of cholangiocarcinoma in Opisthorchis viverrini-infected Syrian golden hamsters</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>4634</fpage><lpage>4639</lpage><year>1978</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">214229</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thamavit</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Kongkanuntn</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiwawech</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Level of Opisthorchis infestation and carcinogen dose-dependence of cholangiocarcinoma induction in Syrian golden hamsters</article-title><source>Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol</source><volume>54</volume><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><year>1987</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02899196</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2892303</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncpgasthep0389</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16397610</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaib</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Serag</surname><given-names>HB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Semin Liver Dis</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>125</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-2004-828889</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15192785</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cholangiocarcinoma - controversies and challenges</article-title><source>Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>189</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrgastro.2011.20</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21460876</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3888819</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thongprasert</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Ann Oncol</source><volume>16</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><fpage>ii93</fpage><lpage>ii96</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/annonc/mdi712</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15958484</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patt</surname><given-names>YZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lozano</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Waugh</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoque</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Frome</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name><name><surname>Lahoti</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ellis</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Vauthey</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Curley</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Phase II trial of cisplatin, interferon alpha-2b, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil for biliary tract cancer</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>3375</fpage><lpage>3380</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11705850</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Woo</surname><given-names>IS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>YS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted infusion of 5-FU (ECF) in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>J Cancer Res Clin Oncol</source><volume>130</volume><fpage>346</fpage><lpage>350</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00432-003-0534-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14997381</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sookprasert</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chindaprasert</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wirasorn</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Asian Pac J Cancer Prev</source><volume>13</volume><issue>Suppl</issue><fpage>S3</fpage><lpage>S6</lpage><year>2012</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>IK</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>BS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Um</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas</article-title><source>Am J Clin Oncol</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>428</lpage><year>2000</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00000421-200008000-00023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10955877</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Longley</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Harkin</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnston</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>5-fluorouracil: Mechanisms of action and clinical strategies</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>330</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc1074</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12724731</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Noordhuis</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Holwerda</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Van der Wilt</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Groeningen</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Smid</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Meijer</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinedo</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>5-Fluorouracil incorporation into RNA and DNA in relation to thymidylate synthase inhibition of human colorectal cancers</article-title><source>Ann Oncol</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1025</fpage><lpage>1032</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/annonc/mdh264</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15205195</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Namwat</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Amimanan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Loilome</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Jearanaikoon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sripa</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhudhisawasdi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Tassaneeyakul</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Characterization of 5-fluorouracil-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cell lines</article-title><source>Chemotherapy</source><volume>54</volume><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>351</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000151541</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18714155</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bourdon</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Murray-Zmijewski</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Diot</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Xirodimas</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Saville</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>p53 isoforms can regulate p53 transcriptional activity</article-title><source>Genes Dev</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>2122</fpage><lpage>2137</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.1339905</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16131611</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">1221884</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marcel</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrier</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Aoubala</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ageorges</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Groves</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Diot</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tauro</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourdon</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>&#x00394;160p53 is a novel N-terminal p53 isoform encoded by &#x00394;133p53 transcript</article-title><source>FEBS Lett</source><volume>584</volume><fpage>4463</fpage><lpage>4468</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.febslet.2010.10.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20937277</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fujita</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Mondal</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Horikawa</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>GH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumamoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sohn</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowman</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Mathe</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Schetter</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pine</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>p53 isoforms Delta133p53 and p53beta are endogenous regulators of replicative cellular senescence</article-title><source>Nat Cell Biol</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1135</fpage><lpage>1142</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb1928</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19701195</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2802853</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Tied up in loops: Positive and negative autoregulation of p53</article-title><source>Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>a000984</fpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/cshperspect.a000984</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20452957</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2857175</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Huo</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>L&#x000FC;</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>XL</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>XB</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>MZ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Expression of p53 isoforms in renal cell carcinoma</article-title><source>Chin Med J (Engl)</source><volume>122</volume><fpage>921</fpage><lpage>926</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anensen</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Oyan</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourdon</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalland</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruserud</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Gjertsen</surname><given-names>BT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A distinct p53 protein isoform signature reflects the onset of induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>3985</fpage><lpage>3992</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1970</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16818696</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hofstetter</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Berger</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiegl</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Slade</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Zori</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Holzer</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuster</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mobus</surname><given-names>VJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Reimer</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Daxenbichler</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Alternative splicing of p53 and p73: The novel p53 splice variant p53delta is an independent prognostic marker in ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Oncogene</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1997</fpage><lpage>2004</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/onc.2009.482</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20101229</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boldrup</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourdon</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Coates</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sj&#x000F6;str&#x000F6;m</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Nylander</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Expression of p53 isoforms in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck</article-title><source>Eur J Cancer</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>617</fpage><lpage>623</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.019</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17215121</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3523263</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Avery-Kiejda</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>XD</given-names></name><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Vojtesek</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Hersey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Small molecular weight variants of p53 are expressed in human melanoma cells and are induced by the DNA-damaging agent cisplatin</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>1659</fpage><lpage>1668</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1422</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18310316</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nutthasirikul</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Limpaiboon</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Leelayuwat</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Patrakitkomjorn</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jearanaikoon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Ratio disruption of the 133p53 and TAp53 isoform equilibrium correlates with poor clinical outcome in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Int J Oncol</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>1181</fpage><lpage>1188</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23404110</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aoubala</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Murray-Zmijewski</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Khoury</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrier</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Prats</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Bourdon</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>p53 directly transactivates &#x00394;133p53&#x003B1;, regulating cell fate outcome in response to DNA damage</article-title><source>Cell Death Differ</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>248</fpage><lpage>258</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/cdd.2010.91</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3039296</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hahnvajanawong</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaiyagool</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Seubwai</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhudhisawasdi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Namwat</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Khuntikeo</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Sripa</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pugk hem</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tassaneeyakul</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase mRNA expression and the response of cholangiocarcinoma to 5-fluorouracil</article-title><source>World J Gastroenterol</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>3955</fpage><lpage>3961</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.3955</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22912546</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3419992</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tepsiri</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaturat</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sripa</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Namwat</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Wongkham</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhudhisawasdi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Tassaneeyakul</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Drug sensitivity and drug resistance profiles of human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell lines</article-title><source>World J Gastroenterol</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>2748</fpage><lpage>2753</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v11.i18.2748</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15884115</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4305909</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thanasai</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Limpaiboon</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Jearanaikoon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sripa</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pairojkul</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tantimavanich</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miwa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of thymidine phosphorylase on tumor aggressiveness and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>World J Gastroenterol</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>1631</fpage><lpage>1638</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1631</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20355241</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2848371</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Voigt</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sulforhodamine B assay and chemosensitivity</article-title><source>Methods Mol Med</source><volume>110</volume><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15901925</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wattanawongdon</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Hahnvajanawong</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Namwat</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanchanawat</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Boonmars</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Jearanaikoon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Leelayuwat</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Techasen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Seubwai</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Establishment and characterization of gemcitabine-resistant human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines with multidrug resistance and enhanced invasiveness</article-title><source>Int J Oncol</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>398</fpage><lpage>410</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25998688</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Naoe</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiyoi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitamura</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Minami</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyawaki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Asou</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuriyama</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusumoto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimazaki</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prognostic value of p53 gene mutations and the product expression in de novo acute myeloid leukemia</article-title><source>Eur J Haematol</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><year>2000</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90138.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10914936</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albaric</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Bret</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Amardeihl</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Delverdier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immunohistochemical expression of p53 in animal tumors: A methodological study using four anti-human p53 antibodies</article-title><source>Histol Histopathol</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>121</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11193185</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Limpaiboon</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Sripa</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wongkham</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhudhisawasdi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Chau-in</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Teerajetgul</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Anti-p53 antibodies and p53 protein expression in cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Hepatogastroenterology</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15011824</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ong</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Subimerb</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Pairojkul</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wongkham</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cutcutache</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>McPherson</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Exome sequencing of liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Nat Genet</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>690</fpage><lpage>693</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.2273</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22561520</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>P53 overexpression predicts poor chemosensitivity to high-dose 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for stage IV colorectal cancers after palliative bowel resection</article-title><source>Int J Cancer</source><volume>97</volume><fpage>451</fpage><lpage>457</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ijc.1637</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11802206</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elsaleh</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Powell</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>McCaul</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Grieu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Grant</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Iacopetta</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>P53 alteration and microsatellite instability have predictive value for survival benefit from chemotherapy in stage III colorectal carcinoma</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>1343</fpage><lpage>1349</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11350904</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaeser</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Pebernard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Iggo</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Regulation of p53 stability and function in HCT116 colon cancer cells</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>279</volume><fpage>7598</fpage><lpage>7605</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M311732200</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reles</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmider</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gee</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Runnebaum</surname><given-names>IB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kilian</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Naggar</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Minguillon</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sch&#x000F6;nborn</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Correlation of p53 mutations with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy and shortened survival in ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>2984</fpage><lpage>2997</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11595686</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Longley</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyer</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>WL</given-names></name><name><surname>Latif</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferguson</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>Maxwell</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>McDermott</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Lynch</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Harkin</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnston</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of thymidylate synthase induction in modulating p53-regulated gene expression in response to 5- fluorouracil and antifolates</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>62</volume><fpage>2644</fpage><lpage>2649</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11980662</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldschneider</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Blanc</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ragu&#x000E9;nez</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Barrois</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Legrand</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Roux</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Haddada</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>B&#x000E9;nard</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Douc-Rasy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Differential response of p53 target genes to p73 overexpression in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line</article-title><source>J Cell Sci</source><volume>117</volume><fpage>293</fpage><lpage>301</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.00834</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b43-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Aaronson</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparative analysis of p73 and p53 regulation and effector functions</article-title><source>J Cell Biol</source><volume>147</volume><fpage>823</fpage><lpage>830</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.147.4.823</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10562283</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2156169</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b44-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fulco</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Costanzo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Merlo</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Mangiacasale</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Strano</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Blandino</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Balsano</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavia</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Levrero</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>p73 is regulated by phosphorylation at the G2/M transition</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>49196</fpage><lpage>49202</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M304921200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12920125</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b45-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The potential tumor suppressor p73 differentially regulates cellular p53 target genes</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>5061</fpage><lpage>5065</lpage><year>1998</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9823311</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b46-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of exogenous p73 gene on chemosensitivity of wild-type p53 human lung adenocarcinoma cell A549</article-title><source>Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><year>2004</year><comment>(In Chinese)</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21241554</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b47-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>SZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>YG</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>ZP</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>YG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of p73 gene on chemosensitivity of human lung adenocarcinoma cells H1299</article-title><source>Ai Zheng</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>645</fpage><lpage>649</lpage><year>2004</year><comment>(In Chinese)</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15191663</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b48-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Adamsen</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name><name><surname>Kravik</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Clausen</surname><given-names>OP</given-names></name><name><surname>De Angelis</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Apoptosis, cell cycle progression and gene expression in TP53-depleted HCT116 colon cancer cells in response to short-term 5- fluorouracil treatment</article-title><source>Int J Oncol</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>1491</fpage><lpage>1500</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17982676</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b49-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Goessl</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Collie-Duguid</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Cassidy</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>O'Brien</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cell cycle perturbation and acquired 5-fluorouracil chemoresistance</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>28A</volume><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b50-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levrero</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>De Laurenzi</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Costanzo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Melino</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The p53/p63/p73 family of transcription factors: Overlapping and distinct functions</article-title><source>J Cell Sci</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>1661</fpage><lpage>1670</lpage><year>2000</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10769197</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b51-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jha</surname><given-names>AK</given-names></name><name><surname>Nikbakht</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jain</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Sehgal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Capalash</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Promoter hypermethylation of p73 and p53 genes in cervical cancer patients among north Indian population</article-title><source>Mol Biol Rep</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>9145</fpage><lpage>9157</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11033-012-1787-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22729911</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b52-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>52</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>YL</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>XR</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>YX</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>XD</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>YX</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Expression and promotor methylation of p73 gene in ovarian epithelial tumors</article-title><source>Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22455848</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b53-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>53</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>House</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Wistuba</surname><given-names>II</given-names></name><name><surname>Argani</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulick</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Hruban</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Maitra</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Progression of gene hypermethylation in gallstone disease leading to gallbladder cancer</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>882</fpage><lpage>889</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/ASO.2003.02.014</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14527906</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b54-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>54</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kawano</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Gombart</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Bartram</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Asou</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakashita</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Said</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Tatsumi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Koeffler</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Loss of p73 gene expression in leukemias/lymphomas due to hypermethylation</article-title><source>Blood</source><volume>94</volume><fpage>1113</fpage><lpage>1120</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10419905</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b55-ijo-47-06-2153"><label>55</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>House</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Herman</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</article-title><source>Mod Pathol</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>412</fpage><lpage>420</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/modpathol.3800287</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Western blot analysis of p53 protein isoform expression in clinical samples. (A) The representative patterns of &#x00394;133p53 isoforms in 5-FU resistance (T1-T4) and 5-FU sensitivity (T5-T8) are compared to 8 normal adjacent tissues (N1-N8). Box plot of normalized &#x00394;133p53 expression was analyzed with 5-FU sensitivity which was classified by histoculture drug response assay (B) and clinical treatment outcome (C). P-value &lt;0.05 indicates significant association.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g00.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity (IC<sub>50</sub>) in CCA cell lines; KKU-M139 (A) and KKU-M214 (B).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g01.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Upregulation of &#x00394;133p53 expression in KKU-M139 and KKU-M214 cells with 5-FU. (A) Western blotting was used to represent the expression of p53 isoforms in parental and 5-FU resistant CCA cell lines. (B) Normalized &#x00394;133p53 expression was plotted against 5-FU concentration. The upregulation of the &#x00394;133p53 with 5-FU is dose-dependent in both parental cell lines. A rapid response was shown in KKU-M214R at 20 &#x003BC;M 5-FU compared to M139R at 50 &#x003BC;M. Data are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD from three independent experiments. <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001 represent statistically significant compared to 0 &#x003BC;M 5-FU as control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g02.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Expression of certain regulatory proteins in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis upon &#x00394;133p53 silencing. (A) Western blot analysis of protein expression. (B) The silencing of &#x00394;133p53 expression was successfully achieved using both siRNA sequences (siRNAa and siRNAb) in both 5-FU resistant cell lines. (C) Cellular morphology was checked after siRNA treatment. (D) Protein intensity normalized with &#x003B2;-actin shows a significant increase of p21, p27, Bax, p73 and downregulation of Bcl-2 protein in KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R. Data are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD from three independent experiments. <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001 compared with control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g03.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Apoptosis induction upon silencing of &#x00394;133p53 in KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cells. (A) Apoptotic cells were determined by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining. Non-apoptotic cells (Q3), early apoptotic cells (Q4), late apoptotic cells (Q2) and necrotic cells (Q1). (B) A significant increase of apoptotic cells (Q2+Q4) are shown in both silenced &#x00394;133p53 CCA cells. Data are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD from three independent experiments. <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001 compared with control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g04.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The cell cycle distribution of silenced &#x00394;133p53. The suppressed &#x00394;133p53 promotes accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase in both KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R. The values are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD, from three separate experiments. <sup>*</sup>P&lt;0.05, <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference between &#x00394;133p53 knockdown cells and their siRNA control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g05.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f7-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Immunocytochemical staining for p53 in CCA cell lines. Brown color detected in the nuclei indicates positivity for p53 protein. Mutant p53 was detected in KKU-M139P and KKU-M214P but not found in 5-FU resistant cell lines (x200 magnification).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g06.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f8-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of &#x00394;133p53 knockdown on the population doubling time and the capability of colony forming of KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cell lines. (A) Doubling times are expressed as mean &#x000B1; SD from three independent experiments. <sup>**</sup>P&lt;0.01, <sup>***</sup>P&lt;0.001 compared with control. (B) The silencing of both si&#x00394;133p53a and si&#x00394;133p53b inhibited colony formation by KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R CCA cells.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-47-06-2153-g07.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinicopathological data of 22 CCA patients.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th colspan="2" valign="bottom" align="center">Chemosensitivity<xref rid="tfn2-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></th></tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th colspan="2" valign="bottom" align="left">
<hr/></th></tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">No.</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Sex</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Age</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Survival time<xref rid="tfn1-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Stage</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Chemotherapy</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">HDRA</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Clinical outcome</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVB</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">II</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Favorable response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Favorable response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">II</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IIIA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">II</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Favorable response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Sensitive</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Favorable response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IIIA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Favorable response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IIIA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">III</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVB</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IIIA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Poor response</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">M</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">IVA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Resistant</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>a</label>
<p>Long and short survival was classified by the median cut off at 52.43 weeks.</p></fn><fn id="tfn2-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>b</label>
<p>Chemosensitivity was categorized according to HDRA and clinical outcome.</p></fn><fn id="tfn3-ijo-47-06-2153">
<p>NA, not applicable is defined as an incomplete drug treatment. HDRA, histoculture drug response assay.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption>
<p>Population doubling time (PDT) and IC<sub>50</sub> of 5-FU at 72-h culture of KKU-M139 and KKU-M214 cell lines.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Cell lines</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Population doubling time (PDT) (h) (mean &#x000B1; SD)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">IC<sub>50</sub> of 5-FU (&#x003BC;M) (mean &#x000B1; SD)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Resistant index (IC<sub>50</sub> of resistant/parental cells)</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KKU-M139P</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.13&#x000B1;0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">6.2&#x000B1;2.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">6.26</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KKU-M139R</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.81&#x000B1;0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">38.8&#x000B1;7.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="right"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KKU-M214P</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.16&#x000B1;1.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">3.9&#x000B1;2.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">10.12</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KKU-M214R</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.92&#x000B1;1.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">39.5&#x000B1;3.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="right"/></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-ijo-47-06-2153" position="float">
<label>Table III</label>
<caption>
<p>The IC<sub>50</sub> of 5-FU at 72-h culture of KKU-M139R and KKU-M214R cell lines after siRNA treatment.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Cell lines</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">5-FU IC<sub>50</sub> at 72 h (&#x003BC;M) (mean &#x000B1; SD)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Fold reduction of IC<sub>50</sub> <xref rid="tfn4-ijo-47-06-2153" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" align="left">KKU-M139R</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Mock</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">38.83&#x000B1;7.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">31.47&#x000B1;4.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;si&#x00394;133p53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">2.7&#x000B1;1.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.66</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;si&#x00394;133p53b</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.7&#x000B1;0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.96</td></tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" align="left">KKU-M214R</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Mock</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">39.5&#x000B1;3.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">35.24&#x000B1;3.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;si&#x00394;133p53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">3.2&#x000B1;2.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.01</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;si&#x00394;133p53b</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.8&#x000B1;1.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.58</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn4-ijo-47-06-2153">
<label>a</label>
<p>Fold reduction, IC<sub>50</sub> of silenced cells/control.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>
