<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Oncology</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1019-6439</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-2423</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ijo.2016.3771</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijo-50-01-0005</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Different functions of AKT1 and AKT2 in molecular pathways, cell migration and metabolism in colon cancer cells</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sahlberg</surname><given-names>Sara H&#x000E4;ggblad</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mortensen</surname><given-names>Anja C.</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Hagl&#x000F6;f</surname><given-names>Jakob</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Engskog</surname><given-names>Mikael K.R.</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Arvidsson</surname><given-names>Torbj&#x000F6;rn</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pettersson</surname><given-names>Curt</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Glimelius</surname><given-names>Bengt</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Stenerl&#x000F6;w</surname><given-names>Bo</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nestor</surname><given-names>Marika</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af3-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="aff">3</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijo-50-01-0005"/></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijo-50-01-0005">
<label>1</label>Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, The Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijo-50-01-0005">
<label>2</label>Division of Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, SE-751 23 Uppsala</aff>
<aff id="af3-ijo-50-01-0005">
<label>3</label>Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijo-50-01-0005">Correspondence to: Dr Marika Nestor, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, The Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden, E-mail: <email>marika.nestor@igp.uu.se</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2016</year></pub-date>
<volume>50</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>5</fpage>
<lpage>14</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2016</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2016</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000A9; Sahlberg et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>AKT is a central protein in many cellular pathways such as cell survival, proliferation, glucose uptake, metabolism, angiogenesis, as well as radiation and drug response. The three isoforms of AKT (AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3) are proposed to have different physiological functions, properties and expression patterns in a cell type-dependent manner. As of yet, not much is known about the influence of the different AKT isoforms in the genome and their effects in the metabolism of colorectal cancer cells. In the present study, DLD-1 isogenic <italic>AKT1</italic>, <italic>AKT2</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> knockout colon cancer cell lines were used as a model system in conjunction with the parental cell line in order to further elucidate the differences between the AKT isoforms and how they are involved in various cellular pathways. This was done using genome wide expression analyses, metabolic profiling and cell migration assays. In conclusion, downregulation of genes in the cell adhesion, extracellular matrix and Notch-pathways and upregulation of apoptosis and metastasis inhibitory genes in the p53-pathway, confirm that the knockout of both <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> will attenuate metastasis and tumor cell growth. This was verified with a reduction in migration rate in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and most explicitly in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO. Furthermore, the knockout of <italic>AKT1</italic>, <italic>AKT2</italic> or both, resulted in a reduction in lactate and alanine, suggesting that the metabolism of carbohydrates and glutathione was impaired. This was further verified in gene expression analyses, showing downregulation of genes involved in glucose metabolism. Additionally, both <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO demonstrated an impaired fatty acid metabolism. However, genes were upregulated in the Wnt and cell proliferation pathways, which could oppose this effect. AKT inhibition should therefore be combined with other effectors to attain the best effect.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>microarray</kwd>
<kwd>metabolism</kwd>
<kwd>cell migration <italic>AKT1</italic></kwd>
<kwd><italic>AKT2</italic></kwd>
<kwd>AKT</kwd>
<kwd>PKB</kwd>
<kwd>gene expression</kwd>
<kwd>colon cancer</kwd>
<kwd>DLD-1</kwd>
<kwd>metabolic profiling</kwd>
<kwd>CD44</kwd>
<kwd>CD133</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cancer progression involves multiple pathways and steps leading to cell growth and proliferation. New therapeutic strategies targeting cell growth and proliferation include several AKT inhibitors, even though little knowledge of their effects in different cell-types or on the genome exists (<xref rid="b1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). In order to predict their effects, as well as possible side-effects, it is important to understand how AKT, particularly the different AKT isoforms, take part in the different cellular pathways.</p>
<p>AKT is the central protein of a major cell signaling system involved in cell survival, metastasis, drug resistance, metabolism and radiation resistance (<xref rid="b2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). While inhibition of AKT can result in inhibition of important pathways for cell-survival, it may also lead to stimulation of other downstream proteins such as receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g. HER3, IGF-1R and insulin receptor), enabling the cancer cells to survive (<xref rid="b3-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). There are three AKT isoforms, AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3, which have high homology but are expressed from three separate genes. Their expression is tissue-dependent and they are believed to have different functions. Knockout mouse studies have shown AKT1 to be essential for cell survival, AKT2 to have a more prevalent role in glucose homeostasis, while AKT3 is believed to be involved in brain development (<xref rid="b4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). Overexpression of the different AKT isoforms has been seen in several types of cancer. An elevated expression of AKT1 has been observed in GIST, thyroid and breast cancer, whereas high AKT2 expression has been seen in glioma, colorectal, hepatocellular, ovarian and pancreatic cancer, and AKT3 overexpression has been observed in breast and prostate cancer (<xref rid="b2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b5-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). In several studies, AKT signaling is associated with enhanced cell motility and invasion (<xref rid="b6-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). However, recent in-depth studies on the AKT isoforms using siRNA, isoform specific inhibitors, AKT isoform expressing vectors and AKT isoform gene knockouts, have shown that AKT1 and AKT2 might play different roles in this pathway depending on the cell type (<xref rid="b6-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Cancer cells generally grow faster than normal cells and often display an increase in glucose uptake and lactate production (<xref rid="b7-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). AKT plays a role in cellular metabolism through its association with glucose uptake via the glucose transporters (GLUT), as well as the conversion of stored glycogen back to glucose. There are several studies showing that AKT1 and AKT2 have different roles in glucose homeostasis (<xref rid="b8-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). <italic>AKT2</italic> silencing in mice was shown to cause an impaired glucose uptake by fat and muscle cells (<xref rid="b9-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>in vitro</italic> studies have demonstrated that <italic>AKT2</italic> silencing causes inhibition of insulin induced GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane. GLUT4 promotes an increase of glucose in the cells when situated in the plasma membrane (<xref rid="b10-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). It has also been proposed that glycolysis can result in formation of pyruvate and NADPH, which can reduce reactive oxygen species and thereby reduces oxidative stress (<xref rid="b11-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>).</p>
<p>Only a few studies have evaluated the effects of the different AKT isoforms in colorectal cancer. We have previously shown that both AKT1 and AKT2 interact with the DNA-repair protein DNA-PKcs and that disruption of these increases radiation sensitivity and influences the expression of cancer stem cell markers CD44 and CD133 (<xref rid="b12-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). While the focus of previous studies has been on a few specific pathways, the present study aimed to perform a genome wide expression profile in <italic>AKT</italic> isoform knockout colon cancer cells. Additionally, metabolomic and cell migration studies could further elucidate the function of the AKT isoforms in colorectal cancer. This may help to improve treatment by assessing new targets for combination therapy or finding biomarkers for prediction of treatment response.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture</title>
<p>The colon cancer isogenic DLD-1 X-MAN&#x02122; cell lines were obtained from Horizon Discovery Ltd., (Cambridge, UK) with the different AKT isoforms genetically knocked out, cat. no. HD-R00-001, HD-R00-002 and HD-R00-003. The cells were cultured in 75-cm<sup>2</sup> culture flasks (Nunclon surface; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) in McCoy's 5A medium (Flow Laboratories, Irvine, UK) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 <italic>&#x000B5;</italic>g/ml streptomycin (Biochrom GmbH, Berlin, Germany). The cells were cultured in a humidified incubator with 5% CO<sub>2</sub> at 37&#x000B0;C and trypsinized with trypsin-EDTA, 0.25% trypsin, 0.02% EDTA (Biochrom GmbH).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Microarray expression analysis</title>
<p>Two separate passages of DLD-1 parental, <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells were cultured to 70% confluence and RNA was extracted (RNeasy MiniPrep; Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The RNA concentration was measured with ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and RNA quality was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). A total of 250 ng of total RNA from each sample was used to generate amplified and biotinylated sense-strand cDNA from the entire expressed genome according to the GeneChip<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> WT PLUS reagent kit user manual (P/N 703174 Rev.1; Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). GeneChip<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> HTA arrays (GeneChip<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> Human Transcriptome array 2.0) were hybridized for 16 h in a 45&#x000B0;C incubator, rotated at 60 rpm. According to the GeneChip<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> expression, Wash, Stain and Scan Manual (P/N 702731 Rev.3; Affymetrix) the arrays were then washed and stained using the Fluidics Station 450 and finally scanned using the GeneChip<sup>&#x000AE;</sup> Scanner 3000 7G.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Microarray data analysis</title>
<p>The raw data was normalized in the free software Expression Console provided by Affymetrix (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.affymetrix.com" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.affymetrix.com</ext-link>) using the robust multi-array average (RMA) method first suggested by Li and Wong in 2001 (<xref rid="b14-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). Subsequent analysis of the gene expression data was carried out in the freely available statistical computing language R (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.r-project.org</ext-link>) using packages available from the Bioconductor project (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.bioconductor.org" ext-link-type="uri">www.bioconductor.org</ext-link>). In order to search for the differentially expressed genes between parental and the <italic>AKT</italic> KO, an empirical Bayes moderated t-test was applied, using the 'limma' package (<xref rid="b15-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). To address the problem with multiple testing, P-values were adjusted using the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (<xref rid="b16-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Pathway analysis</title>
<p>DAVID Bioinformatic resources 6.7 software was used to functionally classify and cluster the genes with an altered expression and identify the most significantly altered pathways, networks and metabolism processes that the genes were involved in. Only genes with a 1.5-fold change and with a P&lt;0.05 were used in the evaluation. To rank and calculate P-values for the different pathways and processes normalized data from all four cell lines was compared. The P-value represents the probability for a particular mapping of an experiment to a process arisen by chance, considering the number of genes in the experiment versus the number of genes in the map process.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Scratch wound migration assay</title>
<p>In this study, DLD-1 isogenic <italic>AKT1</italic>, <italic>AKT2</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> knockout colon cancer cell lines were used as a model system together with the parental cell line in order to further elucidate the differences between the AKT isoforms and how they are involved in various cellular pathways. Many of these pathways are thought to be involved in cellular migration. Thus, the migratory activity of isogenic <italic>AKT1</italic>, <italic>AKT2</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> knockout colon cancer cell lines were studied together with the parental cells, using the scratch wound migration assay (<xref rid="b17-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). The migration rate was monitored at two different settings, complete medium and after starvation plus addition of EGF. DLD-1 parental and <italic>AKT</italic> knockout cells were seeded in 6-well plates in McCoy's 5A medium (Flow Laboratories). After 24 h the cells were washed three times with 2% FBS/McCoy's medium and incubated in starvation medium, 2% FBS/McCoy's, for another 24 h. The cells were wounded with a sterile plastic pipette and rinsed three times to remove cellular debris. Subsequently, complete medium, 10% FBS/McCoy's, plus 15 ng human recombinant EGF (Chemicon) was added. Migration was monitored using a Nikon 700D digital camera mounted on an inverted microscope at time 0&#x02013;24 h after wounding and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The differences in uptake between the <italic>AKT</italic> KO cell lines compared to the parental cell line were evaluated using two-way ANOVA with multiple comparison test and were considered statistically significant at P&lt;0.05.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell harvesting for metabolic profiling</title>
<p>Cells were cultured in 12-cm petri dishes and harvested at ~75% confluence. All cell sample harvesting was performed on ice. Growth medium was removed and cells were rapidly washed three times with cold Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Nordic Biolabs AB, T&#x000E4;by, Sweden) followed by detachment of cells using a rubber-tipped cell scraper (Sarstedt). The detached cells were collected in cold Milli-Q water (3.5 ml), transferred to polypropylene tubes and snap-frozen in liquid N<sub>2</sub> followed by thawing at 37&#x000B0;C for 10 min. The freeze-thaw cycle was then repeated once with subsequent sonication on ice for 30 sec. Protein concentrations were measured in duplicates using the spectrophotometric assay with Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and using bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) for reference samples, all according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were stored at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until metabolite extraction. For each of the four cell lines, three technical replicates were harvested.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Extraction of polar metabolites</title>
<p>Quenched cells were thawed at room temperature and subjected to centrifugation (10 min, 2200 RCF) to remove precipitated cellular debris. The supernatant of the cell extracts was transferred to a fresh extraction tube, followed by addition of chloroform and methanol in the proportions 4:4:2.85 (MeOH:CHCl<sub>3</sub>:H<sub>2</sub>O). The resulting two-phase system was gently mixed and left at 4&#x000B0;C for 30 min prior to centrifugation (2200 RCF, 20 min, 4&#x000B0;C). A fixed volume of the aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and evaporated under N<sub>2</sub> at 40&#x000B0;C until dry. The polar phase was subsequently reconstituted in 0.7 ml phosphate-buffered D<sub>2</sub>O (150 mM, pD 7) containing 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate sodium salt (DSS; 34 <italic>&#x000B5;</italic>M) as a chemical shift reference. For the analysis, one pooled quality control (QC) sample was also created by pooling an equal volume of cell extracts prior to metabolite extraction.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Metabolic profiling using NMR spectroscopy</title>
<p>NMR measurements were carried out at 298 K on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with a cryoprobe. For each sample, the 1D NOESYPR1D standard pulse sequence (&#x02212;RD-90&#x000B0;-t<sub>1</sub>-90&#x000B0;-t<sub>m</sub>-90&#x000B0;-ACQ) was used. Each pulse had a 90&#x000B0; pulse length; the total amount of FIDs recorded were 256 collected into 64 K data points which was zero-filled to 128 K data points. The spectra width was set to 7183.91 Hz giving a spectral acquisition time of 4.56 sec. The t<sub>1</sub> and t<sub>m</sub> was set to 6 <italic>&#x000B5;</italic>sec, respectively, 180 msec and relaxation delay (D1) was 3 sec, resulting in a total acquisition time of 33 min. The 1D spectra were manually phased and baseline corrected and the <sup>1</sup>H chemical shifts were referenced to added DSS using the ACD/Labs (version 12.01; Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada). Each <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectrum, within a range of 0&#x02013;10 ppm, was reduced to 873 bins of fixed width (0.01 ppm) excluding resonance regions for water (&#x003B4;5.15&#x02013;4.67) and the internal standard (DSS, &#x003B4;0.00&#x02013;0.65, 1.77&#x02013;1.72 and 2.92&#x02013;2.88). The signal intensity in each bin was integrated and data were imported, normalized to unit total intensity in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office 2007; Microsoft, Redmond, CA, USA). Assignments of NMR peaks were performed according to the metabolomics standards initiative (MSI) (<xref rid="b18-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>) by comparing with the Human Metabolome Database (v2.5) (<xref rid="b19-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). The metabolites identified should be seen as putatively annotated compounds according to the MSI nomenclature.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Multivariate data analysis of metabolic profiling data</title>
<p>Multivariate data analysis was conducted in SIMCA-P+ (version 13.0; MKS Umetrics AB, Ume&#x000E5;, Sweden) computational software package. Data were Pareto scaling, as implemented in the SIMCA-P+ package, prior to further analysis. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and supervised orthogonal projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used for identification of key differences between parental cell lines and <italic>AKT</italic> KO cell lines (<xref rid="b20-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Gene expression assay</title>
<p>Comparing the different altered pathways in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell-lines, a number of signaling pathways were altered according to the functional annotation analysis, including cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, Notch, Wnt and p53 pathways (<xref rid="f1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Figs. 1</xref> and <xref rid="f2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">2</xref>, and <xref rid="tI-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>).</p>
<p>These pathways were further analyzed to evaluate the importance of the different genes. There were also differences in the metabolic pathways such as the starch, sucrose, glucose pathway, the glutathione metabolism and fatty acid metabolism. Note that some of these genes are involved in more than one pathway (<xref rid="f3-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref> and <xref rid="tII-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>).</p>
<p>In the cell adhesion molecule (CAM) pathway, several genes were downregulated in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell line compared to parental; <italic>ALCAM</italic>, <italic>CD99</italic>, <italic>CDH1</italic>, <italic>CLDN1</italic>, <italic>CLDN2</italic>, <italic>HLA-DMA</italic>, <italic>ITGA9</italic>, <italic>NEO1</italic>, <italic>PTPRF</italic>, <italic>SDC1</italic>, <italic>MET</italic>, <italic>RAC2</italic>, <italic>KIT</italic> and <italic>TGFA</italic>. Genes that were upregulated include <italic>IGF1R</italic>, <italic>PTK2</italic>, <italic>FOXO1</italic> and <italic>PALLD</italic>. The <italic>AKT1</italic> KO cells displayed an analogous pattern. The <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells on the other hand, showed upregulation of several genes in this pathway; <italic>CADM1</italic>, <italic>CLDN1</italic>, <italic>ITGB8</italic>, <italic>NEO1</italic>, <italic>PVRL3</italic>, <italic>SDC4</italic>, <italic>PALLD.</italic></p>
<p>In the ECM-receptor interaction pathway, several genes were altered in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell line compared to parental cells. <italic>CD44</italic> and several integrins; <italic>ITGA1</italic>, <italic>ITGA2</italic> and <italic>ITGB5</italic> were upregulated whereas <italic>CD47</italic>, <italic>ITGA3</italic>, <italic>ITGA9</italic>, <italic>LAMA2</italic>, <italic>LAMB1</italic>, <italic>SYDC1</italic> and <italic>TNC</italic> were downregulated. Similar patterns were seen in the <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO.</p>
<p>In the Notch-signaling pathway, the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1</italic> KO had several genes that were downregulated compared to parental; <italic>HES1</italic>, <italic>MAML2</italic> and <italic>JAG1</italic>. In the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO, <italic>DTX4</italic> and <italic>KAT2B</italic> were also downregulated. In the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO, there was a similar trend, with the exception of <italic>KAT2B</italic>.</p>
<p>Genes involved in the Wnt signaling pathway, were altered in all <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO cells in relation to parental cells. In the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO, genes that were upregulated include; <italic>FZD6</italic>, <italic>FZD7</italic>, <italic>MYC</italic>, <italic>WNT16</italic>, <italic>DACT1</italic> and <italic>TGFB1I1</italic> while <italic>AXIN2</italic>, <italic>RAC2</italic> and <italic>TGFB3</italic> were downregulated. In the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, <italic>DACT1</italic>, <italic>TGFB1I1</italic>, <italic>TGFB2</italic> and <italic>WNT5A</italic> were upregulated while LEF1 was downregulated. In <italic>AKT2</italic> KO, <italic>TGFB2</italic> was upregulated while <italic>AXIN2</italic> was downregulated.</p>
<p>Genes involved in the p53 pathway, were mostly upregulated in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO; <italic>CCNE1</italic>, <italic>CCNE2</italic>, <italic>CDK6</italic>, <italic>PMAIP1</italic>, <italic>RRM2B</italic>, <italic>SERPINB5</italic> and <italic>SESN3</italic>, while <italic>SKP2</italic> was downregulated. A similar pattern was seen in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO compared to parental with <italic>SERPINB5</italic> and <italic>THBS1</italic> upregulated and <italic>SKP2</italic> downregulated. In the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO <italic>SERPINB5</italic> was upregulated while <italic>SESN3</italic> was downregulated.</p>
<p>In the metabolic pathways, that were significantly different between the <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO cells and parental cells were the glutathione and drug metabolism pathways (<xref rid="tII-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). In the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO compared to parental, <italic>GSTM1</italic>, <italic>GSTM2</italic>, <italic>GSTM3</italic>, <italic>GSTM4</italic>, <italic>IDH2</italic>, <italic>IDH1</italic>, <italic>MGST1</italic>, <italic>UGT1A5</italic>, <italic>UGT2B10</italic> were downregulated while <italic>MAOB</italic> and <italic>RRM2B</italic> were upregulated. In the carbohydrate metabolism (including sucrose, starch and glucose) <italic>PYGL</italic>, <italic>PGM2L1</italic> and <italic>APPL1</italic> were upregulated and <italic>UGT1A5, PGM1</italic>, <italic>HK2, UGDH</italic>, <italic>UGT2B10</italic>, <italic>DCXR</italic> and <italic>ALDH2</italic> were downregulated. Similar patterns were seen in the <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO, but not all genes were significantly altered. In the fatty acid metabolism pathway, <italic>ACAA2</italic>, <italic>ALDH7A1</italic>, <italic>ACSL5</italic> were downregulated in the AKT2 KO. The gene expression of ACAA2 was also downregulated in <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, but upregulated in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO. The gene expression of <italic>CPT1A</italic> was downregulated in <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO. In the folate cycle, <italic>ALPP</italic> and <italic>ALPPL2</italic> were upregulated, while <italic>SPR</italic> was downregulated in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell migration</title>
<p>The scratch wound healing assay demonstrated a reduced cell migration rate in the <italic>AKT</italic> KO cell lines compared to the parental cell line (<xref rid="f4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>). In complete media, the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells demonstrated the most pronounced reduction in migration rate (P&lt;0.001) at 16 and 22 h, followed by <italic>AKT1</italic> KO (P&lt;0.05), and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO (P&gt;0.05) (<xref rid="f4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref>). Since growth factors influence the migration rate, the cells were also starved for 24 h before the addition of 15 ng EGF (<xref rid="f4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4B</xref>). In these settings, all different <italic>AKT</italic> KO cells migrated more slowly than the parental cells. The migration rates of the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT</italic>1 KO were the most reduced compared to the parental cells (P&lt;0.001 for both at 16&#x02013;22 h), followed by <italic>AKT2</italic> KO (P&lt;0.05).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Metabolic profiling of the polar metabolome</title>
<p>To further explore possible metabolic alterations, the small polar metabolites were analyzed with NMR spectroscopy and evaluated with multivariate modeling in both <italic>AKT</italic> KO cell lines and the parental cell line. The differences in the polar metabolome between the parental cell line and the <italic>AKT</italic> KO cells were identified using OPLS-DA models and visualized using S-line plots. Moreover, PCA analysis was used to overview the data (<xref rid="f1-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). The altered spectral bins, and consequently the annotated metabolites, were tested for significance using ANOVA followed by LSD Tukey's test (<xref rid="tIII-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>). Significant alterations (P&lt;0.05) were observed in <italic>AKT</italic> KO cells and include decreased levels of lactate, alanine and succinic acid as well as increased levels of formate. Moreover, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO demonstrated a significant increase of glucose metabolism, and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO also showed an increase in glutathione and glutamine. The <italic>AKT1</italic> KO had reduced levels of the branched amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine. Additionally, the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO displayed reduced levels of glycine or reduced glycine levels.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The aim of the present study was to elucidate how different pathways involved in cell survival, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to therapy were altered in AKT isoform knockout cell lines compared to their parental cell line. This was done using genome wide expression profiling together with metabolic profiling, as well as cell migration studies. Results from these analyses were then related to our previous findings regarding DNA repair, radio-resistance, and cancer stem cell marker expression (<xref rid="b12-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>).</p>
<p>One of the steps in tumor invasion, motility and metastasis involves the cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), which take part in both intracellular (ICM) and extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions of the cancer cells. Loss of cell adhesion will render the cancer cell more motile and invasive, and has been associated with metastatic properties (<xref rid="b21-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). In this study, we demonstrated that genes in the CAM and ECM pathways were significantly affected by the knockout of <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> isoforms, and that a result of this could be reduced migration. The majority of the genes in the CAM and ECM pathways were downregulated in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell lines compared to parental cells (<xref rid="tII-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). This is in line with the results in the cell culture migration assays, where the <italic>AKT</italic> knockout cell lines, particularly in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO, showed a reduction in cell migration rate compared to parental cells (<xref rid="f3-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>). This is also in agreement with previous studies, by Ericson <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b22-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>), showing that the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO formed fewer liver metastases compared to parental cells in mouse xenografts. Furthermore, the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells demonstrated an upregulation of genes in the cell adhesion pathway. This could explain the somewhat higher migration rate seen for <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells under EGF treatment (<xref rid="f3-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3B</xref>). Moreover, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells express CD133, as opposed to <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell lines (<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). Notably, all the <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO cells had reduced cell migration compared to parental cells, despite their upregulation of CD44, which is associated with increased cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions, migration and metastasis (<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>).</p>
<p>Pathways that are proposed to be involved in radiation resistance, cell survival and cancer stem cell marker expression are the Notch, Wnt and p53 pathways. The Notch signaling pathway plays an important role in cell survival, embryonic development, proliferation, differentiation and metastasis (<xref rid="b23-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>). The Notch pathway has also a role in cancer stem cells and radiation resistance in malignant glioma (<xref rid="b21-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>) and breast cancer (<xref rid="b24-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>). Furthermore, Notch pathway inhibitors have been shown to increase radiation sensitivity in head and neck cancer and colon cancer xenografts (<xref rid="b25-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). In the present study, we show that <italic>AKT</italic> KO caused a reduction in several genes in the Notch signaling pathway (DTX4, HES1, KAT2B, MAML2 and JAG1). This reduction was seen in <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO, <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and to some extent in <italic>AKT2</italic> KO, which might explain the increase in radiation sensitivity previously seen (<xref rid="b12-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) as well as the effects on cell migration (<xref rid="f4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>) in these cell lines compared to parental cells.</p>
<p>Wnt-signaling is another important pathway in colorectal cancer and cancer stem cells with &#x003B2;-catenin as the key player (<xref rid="b26-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>) (<xref rid="f2-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). The colon cancer cell line, DLD-1, used in the present study has a mutation in APC which is suggested to make this pathway constantly active. However, despite this mutation, we demonstrated that the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells have several upregulated genes (FZD6, FZD7, MYC, WNT16, DACT1 and TGFB1I1) as well as others downregulated (AXIN2, RAC2 and TGFB3) in this pathway. This is also in line with Yang <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b27-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>) showing that APC might still phos-phorylate &#x003B2;-catenin despite its mutation. Furthermore, AXIN2 was downregulated in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell lines compared to their parental cell line, which might result in the upregulation of the genes in the Wnt-pathway, subsequently leading to an upregulation of genes like CD44 as shown in a previous study (<xref rid="b13-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>).</p>
<p>p53 is a tumor suppressor, which is mutated in numerous cancer forms. The colon cancer cell line DLD-1 has one mutated p53 allele and one p53 silent allele (S241F/SIL) and has no effect on the expression of p21 (<xref rid="b28-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>). AKT phosphorylates MDM2, which following phosphorylation, binds to p53 and causes p53 degradation. In contrast, p53 when active, can inhibit the expression of AKT via PTEN. The <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell line had an increase in the expression of genes involved in the p53 pathway compared to parental cells, however, the regulation of these genes might not be guided by p53 in this case. The genes that were upregulated include <italic>PMAIP1</italic> (Noxa) which is involved in apoptosis, <italic>SERPINB5</italic> and <italic>SESN3</italic> involved in inhibition of metastasis and angiogenesis, and <italic>RRM2B</italic> and <italic>THSB1</italic>, which are involved in DNA repair.</p>
<p>The metabolic pathways are important for cell survival and drug resistance. In this study, we have demonstrated the effects of <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO on metabolism, with an altered expression of genes involved in metabolism as well as metabolic end products. The main sources of energy are glucose and glutamine and alterations in their metabolic pathways effect cell growth. A number of genes involved in the metabolic pathways of glucose and starch were downregulated in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cell line compared to parental cells. These genes are involved in different parts of driving the metabolism of starch and glucose forward (<italic>ALDH2</italic>, <italic>DCXR</italic>, <italic>HK2</italic>, <italic>PGM1</italic>, <italic>UGDH</italic>, <italic>UGT1A5</italic> and <italic>UGT2B10</italic>). However, PYGL, which converts stored glycogen into glucose, was upregulated in <italic>AKT1</italic> KO, <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO. The metabolic profiling experiment by NMR-spectroscopy also demonstrated that lactate was reduced in <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells and that alanine was reduced in <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells compared to the parental. This might suggest that the glutamine metabolism and the 'aerobic glycolysis' (i.e. metabolism of glucose to lactate despite presence of oxygen) often seen in cancer cells were reduced (<xref rid="b29-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>) (<xref rid="tIII-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>). This would support the theory of AKT-induced glucose metabolism, and that a reduction of AKT can suppress this process. Additionally, the glucose level was increased in the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells compared to parental cells despite the reduced level of lactate, suggesting that these cells may still import glucose even with the lack of AKT2 or at least using a different metabolic pathway compared to parental cells.</p>
<p>The fatty acid synthesis is believed to be promoted by AKT through the activation of enzymes, which convert acetyl-CoA to fatty acids. Fatty acids are a necessary part of the cell membrane, involved in protein synthesis as well as serve as an essential source of energy and thus proteins involved in the fatty acid synthesis are upregulated in tumor cells (<xref rid="b30-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). AKT regulates the synthesis of proteins and long chain fatty acids via mTOR and fatty acid synthase (FAS). Fatty acids can also be degraded into acetyl-CoA in the mitochondria (via &#x003B2;-oxidation) and used as an energy source. It is speculated that inhibition of the fatty acid biosynthesis or upregulation of the fatty acid degradation would also impair the tumor cell proliferation (<xref rid="b31-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). In the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells, enzymes involved in the fatty acid degradation, <italic>CPT1A</italic>, <italic>ACAA2</italic>, <italic>ALDH7A1</italic> and <italic>ACSL5</italic>, were downregulated, which would suggest that the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells have a lack of acetyl-CoA. However, another source of acetyl-CoA is the metabolism of branched amino acids (valine, leucine and isoleucine). As demonstrated in the metabolomic assay, the level of branched amino acids was reduced in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO cells. The level of succinic acid, which is a part of the Krebs's cycle, was also reduced in all <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO cell lines compared to parental cells. This could be linked to the <italic>IDH1</italic> and <italic>IDH2</italic> downregulation in the <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells and the downregulation of genes in the fatty acid degradation in <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cells (<xref rid="b32-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). This would inhibit the Krebs's cycle and cause cells to have a reduced proliferation.</p>
<p>Another important aspect of the metabolic pathways is the resistance to drugs. The inactivation of chemotherapeutic drugs is catalyzed by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and these enzymes are believed to play an important role in multiple drug resistance to chemotherapy (<xref rid="b33-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). GSTs also suppress the pro-apoptotic protein ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase-1) (<xref rid="b34-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>). <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells show downregulation of several genes in the glutathione pathway, which suggests that the sensitivity to chemotherapeutics may be enhanced and the number of apoptotic cells increased. The downregulation was, on the other hand, not as prominent in the single <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO cell lines. Furthermore, the glutathione level was increased in the <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO, which could be a marker for increased oxidative stress (ROS). However, this should be further clarified by studying the level of ROS in the cells, as well as the level of the reduced form of glutathione. The reduced form of glutathione is able to detoxify the cells but the oxidized form cannot. Lactate may also function as a scavenger and reduced levels of lactate in the <italic>AKT2</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO may be part of the higher radiation sensitivity of these cells compared to their parental cells.</p>
<p>The folate cycle is important in cell replication and survival through its involvement in DNA synthesis, DNA repair and DNA methylation (<xref rid="b35-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). ALPPs are elevated in some cancers, including colorectal cancer (<xref rid="b36-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>), and have been correlated with folate levels. SPR is involved in the folate cycle as well as in cell proliferation (<xref rid="b37-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>). The gene expression of <italic>ALPP</italic> and <italic>ALPPL1</italic> was upregulated in the <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO while SPR was downregulated compared to parental. <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO also showed decreased levels of glycine that can be correlated with an impaired folate cycle. Additionally, the formate level, which is a metabolite in the folate cycle, was increased in all <italic>AKT</italic> isoform KO cells, suggesting that the folate cycle was impaired in the <italic>AKT</italic> KO cells (<xref rid="b38-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). The impaired folate cycle could be connected to the higher radiation sensitivity in <italic>AKT</italic> KO cells compared to parental due to the lack of nucleotides for DNA repair. However, this needs to be further clarified with more extensive metabolite studies.</p>
<p>In summary, this study shows that the dual knockout of both <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> in a colorectal cancer cell line (DLD-1) has great impact on several signaling pathways, such as Notch, Wnt, p53 and genes in the cell adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways, in addition to a reduced cell migration rate. The genome analysis and metabolic profiling results show that both <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> may change the glucose, starch and sucrose metabolism pathway and that genes in this pathway are mostly downregulated when <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> were knocked out. Since lactate and alanine were reduced in <italic>AKT2</italic> and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO cells compared to parental, this further confirms that the aerobic glycolysis and the glutamine catabolism rates were reduced. Genes involved in glutathione and drug metabolism, especially the glutathione S-transferases were downregulated in <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO. This is in line with an observed increase in radiation sensitivity in these cells. The reduction of these pathways confirms that knockout of both <italic>AKT1</italic> and <italic>AKT2</italic> will attenuate metastasis and tumor cell growth. Notably, genes in the Wnt-pathway were upregulated as well as genes that allow progression of the cell cycle, which could oppose this effect. AKT inhibition should therefore be combined with other effectors (drugs, radiation, and inhibitors) to attain the best effect.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors would like to acknowledge Hanna G&#x000F6;ransson Kultima at the SciLife Laboratory Uppsala, Sweden, for all the help with the gene expression analysis and Ida Erngren for the help with the metabolomic analysis.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pal</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Reckamp</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Figlin</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Akt inhibitors in clinical development for the treatment of cancer</article-title><source>Expert Opin Investig Drugs</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1355</fpage><lpage>1366</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1517/13543784.2010.520701</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20846000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3244346</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheung</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Testa</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Diverse mechanisms of AKT pathway activation in human malignancy</article-title><source>Curr Cancer Drug Targets</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>234</fpage><lpage>244</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/1568009611313030002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23297823</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3678724</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chandarlapaty</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sawai</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Scaltriti</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodrik-Outmezguine</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Grbovic-Huezo</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Serra</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Majumder</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Baselga</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosen</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>AKT inhibition relieves feedback suppression of receptor tyrosine kinase expression and activity</article-title><source>Cancer Cell</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.031</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21215704</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3025058</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hollander</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Maier</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hobbs</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashmore</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name><name><surname>Linnoila</surname><given-names>RI</given-names></name><name><surname>Dennis</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Akt1 deletion prevents lung tumorigenesis by mutant K-ras</article-title><source>Oncogene</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1812</fpage><lpage>1821</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/onc.2010.556</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21242979</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4133779</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romano</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of the dysfunctional akt-related pathway in cancer: Establishment and maintenance of a malignant cell phenotype, resistance to therapy, and future strategies for drug development</article-title><source>Scientifica (Cairo)</source><volume>2013</volume><fpage>317186</fpage><year>2013</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Virtakoivu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Pellinen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Rantala</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Per&#x000E4;l&#x000E4;</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ivaska</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Distinct roles of AKT isoforms in regulating &#x003B2;1-integrin activity, migration, and invasion in prostate cancer</article-title><source>Mol Biol Cell</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>3357</fpage><lpage>3369</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E12-03-0213</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22809628</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3431929</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vander Heiden</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantley</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>324</volume><fpage>1029</fpage><lpage>1033</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1160809</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19460998</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2849637</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonzalez</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>McGraw</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Akt kinases: Isoform specificity in metabolism and cancer</article-title><source>Cell Cycle</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>2502</fpage><lpage>2508</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/cc.8.16.9335</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19597332</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2997486</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garofalo</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Orena</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rafidi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Torchia</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stock</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hildebrandt</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Coskran</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Black</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Brees</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wicks</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Severe diabetes, age-dependent loss of adipose tissue, and mild growth deficiency in mice lacking Akt2/PKB beta</article-title><source>J Clin Invest</source><volume>112</volume><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>208</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1172/JCI16885</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12843127</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">164287</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katome</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Obata</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsushima</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Masuyama</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantley</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gotoh</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kishi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Shiota</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ebina</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Use of RNA interference-mediated gene silencing and adenoviral overexpression to elucidate the roles of AKT/protein kinase B isoforms in insulin actions</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>28312</fpage><lpage>28323</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M302094200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12734182</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simons</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Orcutt</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Madsen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Scarbrough</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Spitz</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of Akt pathway signaling in glucose metabolism and metabolic oxidative stress</article-title><source>Oxidative Stress in Cancer Biology and Therapy</source><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Spitz</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Dornfeld</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Krishnan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gius</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><publisher-name>Humana Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-61779-397-4_2</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sahlberg</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Gustafsson</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Pendekanti</surname><given-names>PN</given-names></name><name><surname>Glimelius</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Stenerlow</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The influence of AKT isoforms on radiation sensitivity and DNA repair in colon cancer cell lines</article-title><source>Tumour Biol</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>3525</fpage><lpage>3534</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13277-013-1465-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3980041</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sahlberg</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Spiegelberg</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Glimelius</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Stenerl&#x000F6;w</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Nestor</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of cancer stem cell markers CD133, CD44, CD24: association with AKT isoforms and radioresistance in colon cancer cells</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><fpage>e94621</fpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0094621</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: Expression index computation and outlier detection</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>31</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.98.1.31</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11134512</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">14539</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smyth</surname><given-names>GK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments</article-title><source>Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol</source><volume>3</volume><comment>Article3</comment><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benjamini</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hochberg</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing</article-title><source>J R Stat Soc B</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>289</fpage><lpage>300</lpage><year>1995</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>In vitro scratch assay: A convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro</article-title><source>Nat Protoc</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>333</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nprot.2007.30</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17406593</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sumner</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Amberg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Barrett</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Beale</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Beger</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Daykin</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name><name><surname>Fiehn</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodacre</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Griffin</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI)</article-title><source>Metabolomics</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>221</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24039616</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3772505</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wishart</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Jewison</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Knox</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Djoumbou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandal</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Aziat</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>HMDB 3.0 - The Human Metabolome Database in 2013</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Res</source><volume>41</volume><issue>D1</issue><fpage>D801</fpage><lpage>D807</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1065</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trygg</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wold</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS)</article-title><source>J Chemometr</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>128</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cem.695</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makrilia</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kollias</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Manolopoulos</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Syrigos</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cell adhesion molecules: Role and clinical significance in cancer</article-title><source>Cancer Invest</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>1023</fpage><lpage>1037</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/07357900902769749</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19909018</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ericson</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheong</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Rago</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Samuels</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Velculescu</surname><given-names>VE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kinzler</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Huso</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogelstein</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Genetic inactivation of AKT1, AKT2, and PDPK1 in human colorectal cancer cells clarifies their roles in tumor growth regulation</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>107</volume><fpage>2598</fpage><lpage>2603</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0914018107</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20133737</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2823889</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takebe</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>SX</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Targeting notch signaling pathway in cancer: Clinical development advances and challenges</article-title><source>Pharmacol Ther</source><volume>141</volume><fpage>140</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.09.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3982918</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>McBride</surname><given-names>WH</given-names></name><name><surname>Pajonk</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The response of CD24<sup>&#x02212;</sup>/low/CD44<sup>+</sup> breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>1777</fpage><lpage>1785</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jnci/djj495</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17179479</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Bham</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Fokas</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Beech</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Im</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Muschel</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Delta-like ligand 4-notch blockade and tumor radiation response</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>1778</fpage><lpage>1798</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jnci/djr419</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22010178</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Sousa</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeulen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Richel</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Medema</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Targeting Wnt signaling in colon cancer stem cells</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>653</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1204</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) differentially regulates beta-catenin phosphorylation and ubiquitination in colon cancer cells</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>281</volume><fpage>17751</fpage><lpage>17757</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M600831200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16798748</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sur</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pagliarini</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bunz</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Rago</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaz</surname><given-names>LA</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Kinzler</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogelstein</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A panel of isogenic human cancer cells suggests a therapeutic approach for cancers with inactivated p53</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>106</volume><fpage>3964</fpage><lpage>3969</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0813333106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19225112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2656188</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DeBerardinis</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mancuso</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Daikhin</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Nissim</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Yudkoff</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wehrli</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Beyond aerobic glycolysis: Transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>104</volume><fpage>19345</fpage><lpage>19350</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0709747104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18032601</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2148292</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menendez</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lupu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>763</fpage><lpage>777</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc2222</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17882277</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Currie</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulze</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zechner</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Walther</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Farese</surname><given-names>RV</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer</article-title><source>Cell Metab</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>153</fpage><lpage>161</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23791484</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3742569</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oermann</surname><given-names>EK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Alterations of metabolic genes and metabolites in cancer</article-title><source>Semin Cell Dev Biol</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>370</fpage><lpage>380</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.01.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22306135</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3351496</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johansson</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahlen</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Rinaldi</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahlander</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Siritantikorn</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgenstern</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microsomal glutathione transferase 1 in anticancer drug resistance</article-title><source>Carcinogenesis</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>465</fpage><lpage>470</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/carcin/bgl148</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Ryoo</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Eom</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Glutathione S-transferase mu modulates the stress-activated signals by suppressing apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>276</volume><fpage>12749</fpage><lpage>12755</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M005561200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11278289</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folate and carcinogenesis: An integrated scheme</article-title><source>J Nutr</source><volume>130</volume><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>132</lpage><year>2000</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10720158</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harmenberg</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Frodin</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ljungdahl-Stahle</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mellstedt</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahren</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Stigbrand</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Significance of alkaline phosphatase isozymes in the monitoring of patients with colorectal carcinoma</article-title><source>Tumour Biol</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>231</lpage><year>1989</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000217619</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2814231</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>YR</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Seo</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sepiapterin inhibits cell proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells via down-regulation of p70S6K-dependent VEGFR-2 expression</article-title><source>Oncol Rep</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>861</fpage><lpage>867</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21637925</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-ijo-50-01-0005"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lamarre</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name><name><surname>Morrow</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Macmillan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Brosnan</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Brosnan</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Formate: an essential metabolite, a biomarker, or more?</article-title><source>Clin Chem Lab Med</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>571</fpage><lpage>578</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/cclm-2012-0552</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Venn diagram from gene expression analysis. A comparison of down-regulated and up-regulated genes in the <italic>AKT</italic> isoform knockout cell lines.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-50-01-0005-g00.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>AKT signaling pathway map. AKT is involved in many different signaling pathways such as metabolism, cell cycle regulation, cell survival, DNA repair and proliferation. Arrows mean activation, thick lines mean inhibition and stars indicate genes with differences in expression levels between AKT isoform knockout cell lines and parental cells according to the gene expression analysis.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-50-01-0005-g01.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>A simplified view of the metabolic pathways. A selection of genes with altered expression in the AKT knockout cell lines compared to parental cells according to the gene expression analysis are shown in boxes. Metabolites altered in the AKT knockout cells compared to parental cells according to the metabolome analysis are shown underlined.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-50-01-0005-g02.tif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Scratch wound migration assay of DLD-1 and DLD-1 <italic>AKT</italic> knockout cells. (A) The cell migration under normal conditions. The knockout of <italic>AKT</italic> showed a clear reduction in cell migration compared to parental. The dual knockout of <italic>AKT1/2</italic> showed the most prominent effect (P&lt;0.001) at 16 and 22 h, followed by <italic>AKT1</italic> KO (P&lt;0.05) and <italic>AKT2</italic> KO (P&gt;0.05). (B) Cell migration of cells that were starved for 24 h before addition of EGF showed that <italic>AKT1</italic> KO and <italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO have a similar reduction in migration rate compared to parental cells (P&lt;0.001 for both at 16&#x02013;22 h), followed by <italic>AKT2</italic> KO (P&lt;0.05). The error bars represent the standard deviation from at least triplicates.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="IJO-50-01-0005-g03.tif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Functional annotation chart report of KEGG signaling pathways from DAVID using the downregulated, upregulated or both downregulated and upregulated gene set for each subgroup.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Pathways</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">P-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Genes</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT1</italic> KO vs. parental<break/>Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Notch signaling pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.12E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HES1, MAML2, JAG1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;ECM-receptor interaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.71E-04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAMA3, CD44, ITGB4, ITGB5, ITGA3, THBS1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Focal adhesion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.22E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EGFR, CAV1, LAMA3, ITGB4, ITGB5, ITGA3, CAPN2, THBS1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pathways in cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.94E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EGFR, WNT5A, LAMA3, NKX3-1, FOXO1, ITGA3, APPL1, TGFB2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Both upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;ECM-receptor interaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAMA3, CD44, TNC, ITGB4, ITGB5, ITGA3, LAMB1, THBS1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Focal adhesion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.12E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EGFR, AKT1, CAV1, LAMA3, TNC, ITGB4, ITGB5, ITGA3, LAMB1, CAPN2, THBS1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pathways in cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WNT5A, EGFR, SKP2, FOXO1, LEF1, ITGA3, APPL1, TGFB2, DAPK1, AKT1, LAMA3, NKX3-1, TGFA, LAMB1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Prostate cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.36E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EGFR, AKT1, NKX3-1, TGFA, LEF1, FOXO1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Colorectal cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.98E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">EGFR, AKT1, LEF1, APPL1, TGFB2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT2</italic> KO vs. parental<break/>Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;N/A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.27E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CADM1, ITGB8, PVRL3, CLDN1, NEO1, SDC4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;MAPK signaling pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.87E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BDNF, CACNA2D1, RASGRF2, MAP3K14, FLNA, TGFB2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Both upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.97E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ITGA9, CADM1, ITGB8, PVRL3, CLDN1, CLDN2, NEO1, SDC4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;ECM-receptor interaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.88E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ITGA9, CD44, ITGB8, TNC, SDC4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO vs. parental<break/>Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALCAM, ITGA9, SDC1, PTPRF, CLDN1, CLDN2, CD99, CDH1, NEO1, HLA-DMA</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;ECM-receptor interaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.10E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAMA2, CD47, ITGA9, SDC1, TNC, ITGA3, LAMB1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Notch signaling pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.27E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DTX4, HES1, KAT2B, MAML2, JAG1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;p53 signaling pathway</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.93E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCNE2, CCNE1, SERPINB5, CDK6, RRM2B, PMAIP1, SESN3</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pathways in cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.22E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WNT16, RALBP1, ITGA2, FOXO1, CDK6, APPL1, FZD7, FZD6, CCNE2, IGF1R, CCNE1, PTK2, TCEB1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;ECM-receptor interaction</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.25E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAMA2, CD47, ITGA9, SDC1, CD44, TNC, ITGA1, ITGB5, ITGA2, ITGA3, LAMB1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pathways in cancer</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.33E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WNT16, PPARG, ARNT2, TGFB3, EGLN3, FOXO1, CDH1, KIT, AKT1, CCNE2, IGF1R, CCNE1, PTK2, RAC2, TGFA, LAMB1, RALBP1, MET, SKP2, ITGA2, CDK6, ITGA3, APPL1, FZD7, FZD6, DAPK1, LAMA2, TCEB1</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-ijo-50-01-0005">
<p>Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether the proportion of genes falling into each category differs by group. In DAVID annotation system, Fisher's exact test was adopted to measure the gene-enrichment in annotation terms. P&lt;0.1 was used as the cut-off.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption>
<p>Functional annotation chart report of KEGG metabolic signaling pathways from DAVID using the downregulated, upregulated or both downregulated and upregulated gene set for each subgroup.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Pathways</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">P-value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Genes</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT1</italic> KO vs. parental<break/>Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;N/A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Folate biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.72E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALPPL2, ALPP</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Both upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Folate biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALPPL2, SPR, ALPP</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT2</italic> KO vs. parental</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;N/A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;N/A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Both upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Arginine and proline metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.49E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SAT1, ALDH7A1, CKMT1A, CKMT1B, MAOB</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO vs. parental</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALDH6A1, ACADSB, MUT, HMGCS1, ALDH2, ABAT, ACAA1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Glutathione metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.70E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM3, GSTM4, IDH2, IDH1, MGST1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.10E-03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM3, GSTM4, UGT1A5, UGT2B10, MGST1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Drug metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM3, GSTM4, UGT1A5, UGT2B10, MGST1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UGT1A5, ALDH2, UGDH, UGT2B10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Propanoate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALDH6A1, MUT, ALDH2, ABAT, ACSS2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pentose and glucuronate interconversions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.59E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UGT1A5, UGDH, UGT2B10, DCXR</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Butanoate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.85E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACSM3, HMGCS1, ALDH2, ABAT, BDH2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Androgen and estrogen metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.46E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">STS, HSD3B1, UGT1A5, SULT2B1, UGT2B10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Starch and sucrose metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.71E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UGT1A5, PGM1, HK2, UGDH, UGT2B10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.30E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GNE, GFPT1, PGM1, HK2, UGDH</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Steroid hormone biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.94E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">STS, HSD3B1, UGT1A5, SULT2B1, UGT2B10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Retinol metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.97E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RDH11, UGT1A5, DHRS4L2, UGT2B10, PNPLA4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Upregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;N/A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Both upregulated and downregulated genes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Glutathione metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM3, GSTM4, IDH2, IDH1, RRM2B, MGST1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Starch and sucrose metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.18E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PYGL, UGT1A5, PGM1, HK2, UGDH, UGT2B10, PGM2L1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.69E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALDH6A1, ACADSB, MUT, HMGCS1, ALDH2, ABAT, ACAA1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Butanoate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.15E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ACSM3, HMGCS1, ALDH2, ABAT, BDH2, GAD1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Drug metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.38E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM3, GSTM4, UGT1A5, MAOB, UGT2B10, MGST1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.74E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UGT1A5, ALDH2, UGDH, UGT2B10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pentose and glucuronate interconversions</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.63E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UGT1A5, UGDH, UGT2B10, DCXR</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Propanoate metabolism</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.61E-02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ALDH6A1, MUT, ALDH2, ABAT, ACSS2</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn2-ijo-50-01-0005">
<p>Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether the proportions of genes falling into each category differs by group. In DAVID annotation system, Fisher's exact test was adopted to measure the gene-enrichment in annotation terms. P&lt;0.1 was used as the cut-off.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-ijo-50-01-0005" position="float">
<label>Table III</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of metabolite changes between <italic>AKT</italic> knockout cells and parental cells measured with NMR.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="left">Metabolite ID</th>
<th valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="center">Chemical shift</th>
<th colspan="2" valign="bottom" align="center"><italic>AKT1</italic> KO
<hr/></th>
<th colspan="2" valign="bottom" align="center"><italic>AKT2</italic> KO
<hr/></th>
<th colspan="2" valign="bottom" align="center"><italic>AKT1/2</italic> KO
<hr/></th></tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Alteration</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">P-value</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Alteration</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">P-value</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Alteration</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">P-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Alanine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00003</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leucine, isoleucine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0344</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Valine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0151</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glycine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0075</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0, 3.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0045</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.005</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glucose</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.24, 3.41, 3.52, 3.88, 4.64, 5.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lactate</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.31, 4.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0008</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0082</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Glutathione<xref rid="tfn4-ijo-50-01-0005" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.16, 2.55, 2.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0007</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Succinic acid</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0021</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0063</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0015</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Formic acid (formate)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0135</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0132</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AMP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.93, 6.13, 8.26, 8.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0346</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0263</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ADP/ATP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.39, 6.13, 8.26, 8.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0398</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn3-ijo-50-01-0005">
<p>Alterations in metabolites between the respective A<italic>KT</italic> knockout cells compared to parental. No change (NC), increased level (+) and decreased level (&#x02212;). The P-values were calculated by ANOVA followed by LSD Tukey's test. Only metabolites with P-values &lt;0.05 are presented.</p></fn><fn id="tfn4-ijo-50-01-0005">
<label>a</label>
<p>Identity confirmed by spiking of certified reference standard into parental cell line after metabolite extraction.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>
