The phenomenon of ischemic pre-conditioning refers to a therapeutic approach whereby repeated short episodes of ischemia protect the myocardium against a subsequent total occlusion of the coronary artery. This approach has been recognized as the strongest form of in vivo protection against myocardial ischemic injury, since it is most consistent and the magnitude of protection achieved is larger than that from any other intervention. It has been suggested that such pre-conditioning has significant application prior to cardiac surgery. A brief period of ischemia protects the heart from more prolonged episodes of ischemia, and reduce not only the infarct size but also its incidence, and also minimize severity of reperfusion-induced arrhythmias, preventing endothelial cell dysfunction (16).

The mechanism underlying ischemic pre-conditioning is very complex and is probably associated with the activation of certain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). There is also evidence indicating the transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinase activity, and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. As briefly illustrated in Fig. 2, activation of GPCR and PI3K/Akt leads to elevated activity of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitric oxide (NO) formation, as well as guanylate cyclase and protein kinase G (PKG). Substrates for PKG include the SR regulatory protein phospholamban, which promotes SR Ca²⁺ uptake, and thus reduces cytosolic Ca²⁺ overload and inhibition of mPTP. Activation of Akt also inhibits GSK-3β and pro-apoptosis members of the Bcl-2 protein family such as Bad and Bim, thereby inhibiting mPTP opening.

The phenomenon of ischemic post-conditioning encompasses introduction of brief cycles of ischemia/reflow soon after the damaging prolonged ischemia followed by reperfusion (17). Ischemic post-conditioning has been shown to reduce infarct size, in some cases, equivalent to that observed with ischemic pre-conditioning. In general, the protection afforded by ischemic post-conditioning is weak or absent after brief ischemic episodes that cause small infarcts (18). However, unlike ischemic pre-conditioning, which delays the development of infarction, post-conditioning reduces reperfusion injury. Although no standard operating procedures have been defined, the post-conditioning intervention must be done within the first few minutes following reperfusion after ischemia. The mechanism by which post-conditioning reduces reperfusion injury is less understood. Several autacoids and kinases appear to share common roles in classic pre- and post-conditioning (Fig. 2). Post-conditioning probably provides the protective effect mainly by its ability to delay the normalization of intracellular pH for few minutes, by slowing metabolite washout, secondary to flow interruptions. These flow interruptions also reduce oxidative damage and preserve the NO-cGMP-PKG signaling pathway and inhibit Na⁺/H⁺ exchange and thus Ca²⁺ overload (19,20).

The phenomenon of remote ischemic conditioning refers to the protection of the heart against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury by applying brief episodes of non-lethal ischemia and reperfusion to another organ or tissue. In this approach, the therapeutic intervention is applied away from the heart, to another organ or tissue, thereby facilitating its clinical application (21). The procedure is non-invasive and can be applied before and during sustained ischemia and the onset of reperfusion. In fact, remote ischemic conditioning can be achieved simply by inflating and deflating a blood pressure cuff placed around the upper arm and inducing three 5-min cycles of ischemia and reflow (21). Such therapeutic intervention has been reported to be beneficial in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (22). The infarct-size-limiting effects of remote conditioning have been shown to be comparable to the effects of ischemic post-conditioning (23). Although the mechanism by which remote ischemic conditioning approach exerts cardiac protection is not clear, two major hypotheses have been proposed: i) The neural hypothesis, which states that autocoids released from the remote ischemic organ affect the local afferent neural pathway, which in turn, activates the efferent neural pathways to trigger end organ protection; and ii) the humoral hypothesis, which states that autocoids released from the ischemic remote organ are transported to the end organ, the heart, resulting in the activation of kinase signaling pathways, such as PI3K/Akt (24).

Therapeutic hypothermia, from mild hypothermia (32–35°C), to moderate (28–32°C), severe (20–28°C), and profound (<20°C) hypothermia is shown to be beneficial against myocardial reperfusion injury in animal studies (25,26). These studies have revealed that lowering myocardial temperature during ischemia can limit infarct size via reductions in metabolic demand, inflammatory response, platelet aggregation, and by increasing myocardial efficiency. However, translation of these beneficial effects to humans in clinical trials met with limited success and this is mostly attributed to the cooling devices used, such as endovascular heat exchange devices, which take considerable time to induce reduction in core temperatures. Consequently, in clinical studies employing such devices, only a minority of patients were able to reach the target temperature of <35°C before reperfusion. In a pilot study described by Götberg et al (27) patients were randomly exposed to hypothermia induced by intravenous infusion of cold saline before reperfusion and all patients could attain a core body temperature of <35°C before reperfusion and had reduction in infarct size (27). In addition, no increase in adverse events was seen. This pilot study demonstrated that attaining a core body temperature of <35°C rapidly may be effective in reducing myocardial infarct size and can be quickly and safety induced without a significant delay in reperfusion.

The build up of intracellular calcium resulting from the inhibition of Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase and by the hyperactivation of Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger in cardiomyocytes during ischemia and reperfusion, is the rationale for the use of Na⁺/H⁺ exchange inhibitors, to protect the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cariporide has been extensively studied and it demonstrated an attenuation of reperfusion injury characterized by improved LV function (28). SM-20550, another Na⁺/H⁺ exchange inhibitor, was compared with nicorandil, a K-channel opener with nitrate-like activity. Both reduced infarct size in a dose-dependent manner when given pre-ischemia but only SM-20550 was beneficial when given post-ischemia (29). Besides the cardioprotective effects, several lines of evidence indicates that Na⁺/H⁺ exchange inhibition is also effective to minimize myocardial remodelling (30).

Animal studies have demonstrated that inclusion of ANP during reperfusion reduces infarct size through the activation of cGMP/PKG signaling pathway (31), PKG, when activated by cGMP, phosphorylates several intracellular target proteins that are involved in the regulation of vascular tone, vasorelaxation in vascular smooth muscle and also endothelial permeability, and cell differentiation and proliferation. Targeting this pro-survival signaling pathway of cGMP/PKG for the prevention of myocardial reperfusion injury also has evidence from studies using inhibitors of (PDE enzymes, in particular PDE5, which blocks the hydrolysis of cGMP. Thus PDE5 inhibitors such as sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil have been shown to be protective against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, by inducing the expression of NOS, and activation of PKG-dependent hydrogen sulfide generation. There have been several clinical studies indicating the beneficial effects of PDE5 inhibitors, which appear to act similarly to cardiac pre-conditioning (32). In studies on pigs, reduction in the infarct size and improvement in ventricular function has been shown by intravenous ANP administration at the time of reperfusion following myocardial ischemia (33).

Insulin administration also acts through the cGMP/PKG signaling pathway, as well as by increasing glucose use (34). Experimental animal studies have shown that promoting anabolic utilization of glucose by myocardium, using insulin during acute myocardial ischemia is beneficial for the heart (35). A large number of clinical trials have investigated the effect of this therapeutic approach using GIK. Despite mixed results, it appears that GIK therapy may be more effective to reduce infarct size as well as serious electrical complications when administered in the ambulance to patients with MI that will receive primary angioplasty (36).

The insulinotropic incretin, GLP-1 and its analogue exenatide have been shown to offer protection during ischemia-reperfusion (37,38). This therapeutic approach has successfully been translated into the clinical setting, employing exenatide during reperfusion (39).

Adenosine and other adenosine receptor agonists have been studied in numerous experimental models and some, but not all, showed cardioprotective effects. A variety of mechanisms of action of a cardioprotective effect for adenosine has been suggested, including a potent vasodilatory action, among others. In addition to its effects on the vasculature and leukocytes, adenosine increases NO availability via activation of Akt/cGMP/PKG signaling pathway. This autocoid has been evaluated intravenously in several trials (40) without conclusive results, although evidence was obtained for cardiac protection at high dose of adenosine, in patients with previous infarctions (41). However, a subsequent double-blind study with 200 patients revealed that even though not all patients benefit from adenosine to limit infarct size, this goal could be achieved in patients receiving primary angioplasty within the first 3 h after the onset of pain (42). These patients also showed an improvement in LV ejection fraction during the first 6 months after the infarction. Since intracoronary adenosine is a safe and inexpensive treatment, its early use in reperfused patients could be easily adopted if later studies confirm the benefits.

Cyclosporine-A is the first pharmacologic agent that has been shown to limit infarct size by inhibiting the opening of the mPTP. Although other indirect mPTP inhibitors, including sodium nitrite, bendavia, and TRO40303 have been described, cyclosporine-A remains the most promising intervention. In a first pilot study, cyclosporine-A limited infarct size in 58 patients with MI undergoing primary angioplasty (43). Even though another study with similar number of patients found no benefit in clinical outcomes (44), the current concern is to know whether this therapeutic approach can reduce death, hospitalization for heart failure, and LV remodeling. Also the negative results from a recent multi center study on the ability of cyclosporine to contain the reperfusion injury and infarct size were questioned by the possible differences in the vehicle used for cyclosporine administration (45).

The beneficial effect of β-blockers on LV remodeling, reinfarction, life-threatening arrhythmias, and most importantly, mortality are well documented. However, their effect on infarct size is somewhat more controversial, and preclinical evidence on the use of β-blockers for reducing infarct size is mixed. From the 1970s to 1980s, different β-blockers were tested with no definite conclusion on their cardioprotective effect. These trials were performed before reperfusion became established practice. Preclinical data from the pig model of MI demonstrated that intravenous injection of metoprolol significantly reduced infarct size when administered before reperfusion (46). The mechanism responsible for this infarct-limiting effect is proposed to be related to the effect of metoprolol on circulating cells such as neutrophils and platelets, rather than cardiomyocytes (47). This pre-clinical evidence led to a clinical study aimed to determine the effect of intravenous metropolol, administered immediately before primary angioplasty, on infarct size determined with magnetic resonance imaging and the results showed protection via an increase in myocardial salvage without complications (48). Although there is excitement about the cardioprotective potential of new β-blockers such as nebivolol (49), sufficient pre-clinical investigation, including reproducible results in multiple animal models, should be completed before large-scale clinical testing. Majority of the earlier clinical trials that looked at the efficacy of β-blockers in MI were carried out in the pre-thrombolytic era, and the consensus from these studies was that β-blockers might reduce infarct size when given very early after the onset of symptoms.

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were developed for the reduction of thrombotic events due to their potent effect on platelets and platelet-leukocyte aggregates implicated in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Most of the clinical trials employed abciximab, the potent glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, and it was suggested that abciximab could reduce myocardial infarct size and lead to improved clinical outcomes when administered early to patients with myocardial infarct (50) or when given via an intracoronary route compared with intravenous route (51). This benefit may be related to reduction in platelet aggregation, thus keeping the infarct-related coronary artery patent. However, it has been noted that certain antiplatelet agents, such as clopidogrel and cangrelor, reduce myocardial infarct size and prevent myocardial reperfusion injury when administrated at the time of myocardial reperfusion in ischemia-reperfusion models that do not primarily involve in formation of thrombus as the cause of the coronary occlusion but induce ischemia mechanically (52). Therefore, antiplatelet therapy given to MI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention may be cardioprotective through some pleitropic mechanisms. Currently, the standard of care for MI patients includes potent oral antiplatelet agents primarily and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are prescribed for a selected MI population. Comparison of two different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, abciximab and eptifibatide, has revealed that abciximab was superior to eptifibatide in improving angiographic and electrocardiographic assessment of coronary perfusion, as well as in reducing infarct size (53).

Although early clinical trial in the pre-thrombolytic era of the 1970s and 1980s suggested that nitrates could reduce mortality in the setting of MI, large clinical trials failed to confirm this benefit (54). Nevertheless, there is renewed interest in nitrates as a cardioprotectant in recent years because new clinical and animal model studies have shown promising results. Several recent clinical studies have shown the potential of nitrates to limit myocardial infarct size. A retrospective analysis of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes data set aiming to determine if antecedent nitrate therapy led to less myocardial necrosis during the ischemic event, has revealed that 18% of chronic nitrate users were diagnosed with MI compared with 41% of nitrate-naive patients (55). Similarly, 82% of nitrate users presented with non-MI compared with 59% of patients who were nitrate naive. Moreover, nitroglycerin used as nitrate, was associated with lower tropin levels, regardless of acute coronary syndrome type. Nitroglycerin has also been shown to have pre-conditioning mimetic action in several clinical circumstances. In patients with stable angina, pre-treatment with nitroglycerin 24 h before an exercise tolerance test improved functional capacity and electrocardiographic manifestations of ischemia. Patients who received nitroglycerin had improvement in ST-segment shifts, regional wall motion abnormalities, and chest pain score after balloon inflation compared with patients who received saline (56).