MCO Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2049-9450 2049-9469 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/mco.2016.965 MCO-0-0-965 Articles Prognostic value of parameters derived from white blood cell and differential counts in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy SaitoTetsuo 1 ToyaRyo 1 2 MatsuyamaTomohiko 1 SembaAkiko 1 MatsuyamaKeiya 1 OyaNatsuo 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA Correspondence to: Dr Tetsuo Saito, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1, Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan, E-mail: tsaito@kumamoto-u.ac.jp 09 2016 22 07 2016 5 3 241 246 08042016 27062016 Copyright © 2016, Spandidos Publications 2016

The aim of the present study was to identify white blood cell (WBC) parameters with high prognostic value for the survival of patients receiving palliative radiotherapy. The prognostic value of seven parameters derived from WBC and differential counts was retrospectively evaluated in patients who underwent palliative radiotherapy between October, 2010 and June, 2013. The analyzed parameters were the total WBC count, the absolute and relative lymphocyte count, the absolute and relative neutrophil count, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratios. Following univariate analysis, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for gender, age, disease type, previous chemotherapy, previous radiotherapy and the levels of albumin and lactate dehydrogenase. A total of 220 patients with a median survival of 4.7 months were identified. All seven parameters were found to be statistically significant predictors of survival on univariate Cox regression analysis (P<0.05). Of these parameters, the low relative lymphocyte and high relative neutrophil counts were consistent predictors of poor survival in patients who received chemotherapy within 1 month prior to blood sampling (n=68) and in patients who received steroid treatment at the time of sampling (n=49). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the relative lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were independent predictors of survival in all 220 patients (P<0.05). In conclusion, relative lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were of high prognostic value for the survival of patients receiving palliative radiotherapy, even in those receiving medications that affect WBC and differential counts.

 palliative radiotherapy prognostic factor overall survival white blood cell parameters prediction of survival Introduction

The prediction of survival is crucial for determining the indications for radiotherapy (RT) and the dose fractionation schedule (1,2). Although various patient and tumor characteristics have been investigated for their prognostic value in patients receiving palliative RT (3–5), predicting prognosis remains a challenge (1,6).

Cancer-related inflammation affects the proliferation and survival of malignant cells, angiogenesis, tumor metastasis, the subversion of adaptive immunity and the tumor response to chemotherapeutic drugs and hormones (7,8). Parameters derived from white blood cell (WBC) and differential counts have been reported to be powerful prognostic predictors in patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases (9–11). The total WBC count (TWBC) (12), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) (13–15), relative lymphocyte count (RLC) (12,13,16), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (13,17,18), relative neutrophil count (RNC) (13,19), the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) (13,20–22) and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (L/M ratio) (22–24) have been identified as significant prognostic factors in patients with malignant diseases. As the majority of these studies only evaluated one or a few of these parameters (12,14–24), their comparative assessment in patients undergoing palliative RT is required.

To identify WBC parameters with high prognostic value for the survival of patients receiving palliative RT, parameters derived from WBC and differential counts were retrospectively compared and subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the prognostic value of these parameters in patients on medication affecting their WBC count.

 Patients and methods <sec> <title>Patients

This retrospective study was approved by the Kumamoto University Hospital Institutional Review Board (no. 986), and patient informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: i) Patients treated with palliative RT between October, 2010 and June, 2013; ii) acquisition of laboratory data, including WBC and differential counts and albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, within 2 weeks prior to the initiation of RT; and iii) availability of chemotherapy data obtained within 1 month prior to blood sampling and of data on medications administered at the time of blood sampling. When more than one blood sample was obtained within 2 weeks prior to the initiation of RT, the latest sample was used for analysis. Patient, tumor and treatment data were collected from medical charts.

 Prognostic factors of survival

Seven parameters, namely TWBC, ALC, RLC, ANC, RNC, N/L ratio and L/M ratio, were analyzed. The TWBC, RLC, and RNC were available from the patients' medical charts; the other 4 parameters were calculated based on these counts.

 Statistical analysis

Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, median and range). Overall survival, calculated from the initiation of RT, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; differences were assessed using the log-rank test. For this test, continuous variables were dichotomized based on our laboratory's reference values. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed, first to assess the effect of the WBC parameters on the overall survival of all patients, and then on patients receiving medications that affect WBC and differential counts: The patients who had received chemotherapy within 1 month prior to blood sampling (subgroup A) and those who received steroids at the time of blood sampling (subgroup B). Finally, the parameters that were statistically significant predictors of survival in all patients and in the two subgroups, were subjected to multivariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for gender, age, disease type, previous chemotherapy, previous RT and albumin and LDH levels. For univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, the seven WBC parameters, age, and albumin and LDH levels, were used as continuous variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed in patients who were followed up for >5 months or until death. The prognostic value of the WBC parameters for death within 5 months was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curves. Differences of P<0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 22 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA).

 Results <sec> <title>Patients

A total of 220 patients with a median survival of 4.7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7–5.7 months) were identified. The median follow-up period from the initiation of RT was 3.5 months (range, 0–53.5 months) for all patients. The patient characteristics and laboratory data are summarized in Table I. In 189 patients (86%) with solid tumors, the primary site was the lung (n=59), digestive tract (n=40), liver (n=10) and other sites (n=80). A total of 31 patients (14%) had hematological tumors; 16 presented with multiple myeloma, 9 with malignant lymphoma and 6 with other diseases. The median total radiation dose was 30 Gy (range, 3–60 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 10 (range, 1–30).

 Prognostic factors for survival

In all 220 patients, univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that all seven WBC parameters were statistically significant predictors of survival (Table II). A low RLC and high RNC were consistent predictors of poor survival in the two subgroups (Table II). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that RLC and RNC were independent predictors of survival in all 220 patients (P<0.05, Table III).

Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test (Fig. 1). The continuous variables were dichotomized according to the reference values in our laboratory. The lower limit of RLC and the upper limit of RNC were 19 and 75%, respectively. Among all patients, those with an RLC of ≥19% had significantly better overall survival compared with those with an RLC of <19% (P<0.001); this was also true for subgroups A (P=0.040) and B (P=0.016). Overall survival for all patients and subgroup B was significantly better for RNC<75% compared with RNC≥75% (P<0.001 and P=0.020, respectively); the difference was not statistically significant in subgroup A (P=0.138).

ROC analysis was performed in184 patients (84%) who were followed up for >5 months or until death. Table IV shows the AUC for the ROC curves for each WBC parameter. RLC and the N/L and L/M ratios were slightly better at predicting death within 5 months compared with the remaining 4 parameters.

 Discussion

Of the seven WBC parameters investigated, RLC and RNC were of high prognostic value for the survival of patients receiving palliative RT. Overall, patients with low RLC and those with high RNC had poor overall survival; this was also true for patients receiving steroids or chemotherapy. The RLC value was a slightly better predictor, as its prognostic value was consistently significant in our subgroup analyses using the log-rank test, and its AUC value in the ROC curve analysis was higher.

Data on the prognostic value of parameters derived from WBC and differential counts in patients receiving palliative RT are limited. Gripp et al (25) found that an elevated TWBC was associated with a poor prognosis in 216 patients recently referred for palliative RT. Others reported that decreased ALC values were a prognostic factor for poor survival in 104 patients with brain metastases who received whole-brain RT (26) and in 130 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer who received whole-brain RT (27). Survival prediction is critical for determining the dose fractionation schedule in patients receiving palliative RT (1,2). Our findings may contribute to the identification of appropriate parameters for survival prediction in these patients.

Our subgroup analyses demonstrated that RLC and RNC were useful predictors of survival, even in patients receiving medications that affect WBC and differential counts. Certain patients receiving palliative RT are also treated with chemotherapy or steroids. Earlier studies on the prognostic value of WBC parameters excluded patients receiving steroids or chemotherapy (14,24,28); our subgroup analysis renders our findings applicable to such patients.

WBC parameters have been shown to be of prognostic value in patients with various malignancies (9,12–24). Palliative RT is delivered to heterogeneous patient populations, i.e., patients with solid tumors from different primary sites and patients with hematological tumors. In such patients, disease-specific factors, such as tumor stage (20,29–31), tumor size (31,32), or tumor-specific markers (33–35) do not appear to be useful for the prediction of prognosis. However, RLC and RNC may represent useful prognostic factors in heterogeneous patients receiving palliative RT.

Our study had certain limitations. First, as it was retrospective, potential confounders, such as performance status, could not be included in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the size of the subgroups was limited and parameters other than RLC or RNC may be found to be of prognostic value in larger patient populations.

In summary, the prognostic value of seven WBC parameters was compared and low RLC and high RNC levels were found to predict poor survival in patients receiving palliative RT. Our subgroup analyses demonstrated that these were significant prognostic factors, even in patients treated with medications affecting WBC and differential counts. As the investigated parameters are derived from complete blood counts, they may be used in daily clinical practice. Our findings may contribute to the selection of appropriate treatment schedules for patients receiving palliative RT.

 References GrippSMjartanSBoelkeEWillersRPalliative radiotherapy tailored to life expectancy in end-stage cancer patients: Reality or myth?Cancer11632513256201010.1002/cncr.2511220564632 NiederCAngeloKDalhaugAPawinskiAHauklandENorumJPalliative radiotherapy during the last month of life: Predictability for referring physicians and radiation oncologistsOncol Lett1030433049201526722287 ChowEAbdolellMPanzarellaTHarrisKBezjakAWardePTannockIValidation of a predictive model for survival in metastatic cancer patients attending an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinicInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys73280287200910.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.01918676092 KrishnanMSEpstein-PetersonZChenYHTsengYDWrightAATemelJSCatalanoPBalboniTAPredicting life expectancy in patients with metastatic cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: The TEACHH modelCancer120134141201410.1002/cncr.2840824122413 MizumotoMHaradaHAsakuraHHashimotoTFurutaniKHashiiHTakagiTKatagiriHTakahashiMNishimuraTPrognostic factors and a scoring system for survival after radiotherapy for metastases to the spinal column: A review of 544 patients at Shizuoka cancer center hospitalCancer11328162822200810.1002/cncr.2388818846565 TsengYDKrishnanMSSullivanAJJonesJAChowEBalboniTAHow radiation oncologists evaluate and incorporate life expectancy estimates into the treatment of palliative cancer patients: A survey-based studyInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys87471478201310.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.204624074920 MantovaniAAllavenaPSicaABalkwillFCancer-related inflammationNature454436444200810.1038/nature0720518650914 ColottaFAllavenaPSicaAGarlandaCMantovaniACancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: Links to genetic instabilityCarcinogenesis3010731081200910.1093/carcin/bgp12719468060 NagaiSAbouljoudMSKazimiMBrownKAMoonkaDYoshidaAPeritransplant lymphopenia is a novel prognostic factor in recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantationTransplantation97694701201424637868 VaduganathanMAmbrosyAPGreeneSJMentzRJSubaciusHPMaggioniAPSwedbergKNodariSZannadFKonstamMAPredictive value of low relative lymphocyte count in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Insights from the EVEREST trialCirc Heart Fail5750758201210.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.97052523051949 KovesdyCPGeorgeSMAndersonJEKalantar-ZadehKOutcome predictability of biomarkers of protein-energy wasting and inflammation in moderate and advanced chronic kidney diseaseAm J Clin Nutr90407414200910.3945/ajcn.2008.2739019535427 HyodoIMoritaTAdachiIShimaYYoshizawaAHiragaKDevelopment of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patientsJpn J Clin Oncol40442448201010.1093/jjco/hyp18220085908 JinYYeXHeCZhangBZhangYPretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictor of survival for patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomaHead Neck376975201510.1002/hed.2356524327524 De GiorgiURihawiKAietaMLo ReGSavaTMasiniCBaldazziVDe VincenzoFCameriniAFornariniGLymphopenia and clinical outcome of elderly patients treated with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell cancerJ Geriatr Oncol5156163201410.1016/j.jgo.2014.01.00124495699 Le ScodanRMassardCMouret-FourmeEGuinebretierreJMCohen-SolalCDe LalandeBMoissonPBreton-CalluCGardnerMGoupilABrain metastases from breast carcinoma: Validation of the radiation therapy oncology group recursive partitioning analysis classification and proposition of a new prognostic scoreInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys69839845200710.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.02417544592 KikuchiNOhmoriKKuriyamaSShimadaANakahoTYamamuroMTsujiISurvival prediction of patients with advanced cancer: The predictive accuracy of the model based on biological markersJ Pain Symptom Manage34600606200710.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.00117629667 SchmidtHSuciuSPuntCJGoreMKruitWPatelPLienardDvon der MaaseHEggermontAMKeilholzUPretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and leukocytes as independent predictors of overall survival in patients with American joint committee on cancer stage IV melanoma: ReSults of the EORTC 18951 biochemotherapy trialJ Clin Oncol2515621569200710.1200/JCO.2006.09.027417443000 TeramukaiSKitanoTKishidaYKawaharaMKubotaKKomutaKMinatoKMioTFujitaYYoneiTPretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of Japan multinational trial organisation LC00-03Eur J Cancer4519501958200910.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.02319231158 HeJRShenGPRenZFQinHCuiCZhangYZengYXJiaWHPretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and lymphocytes as independent prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomaHead Neck3417691776201210.1002/hed.2200822318781 AbsengerGSzkanderaJPichlerMStotzMArmingerFWeissmuellerMSchaberl-MoserRSamoniggHStojakovicTGergerAA derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colon cancer patientsBr J Cancer109395400201310.1038/bjc.2013.34623820252 TempletonAJPezaroCOmlinAMcNamaraMGLeibowitz-AmitRVera-BadilloFEAttardGde BonoJSTannockIFAmirESimple prognostic score for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with incorporation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioCancer12033463352201410.1002/cncr.2889024995769 SzkanderaJGergerALiegl-AtzwangerBAbsengerGStotzMFriesenbichlerJTrajanoskiSStojakovicTEberhardKLeithnerAPichlerMThe lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome and improves the predictive accuracy in patients with soft tissue sarcomasInt J Cancer135362370201410.1002/ijc.2867724347236 RambaldiABoschiniCGrittiGDelainiFOldaniERossiABarbuiAMCaraccioloDLadettoMGueliAThe lymphocyte to monocyte ratio improves the IPI-risk definition of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma when rituximab is added to chemotherapyAm J Hematol8810621067201310.1002/ajh.2356623940056 HuangYFengJFLow preoperative lymphocyte to monocyte ratio predicts poor cancer-specific survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomaOnco Targets Ther8137145201525609981 GrippSMoellerSBölkeESchmittGMatuschekCAsgariSAsgharzadehFRothSBudachWFranzMWillersRSurvival prediction in terminally ill cancer patients by clinical estimates, laboratory tests and self-rated anxiety and depressionJ Clin Oncol2533133320200710.1200/JCO.2006.10.541117664480 ClaudeLPerolDRay-CoquardIPetitTBlayJYCarrieCBachelotTLymphopenia: A new independent prognostic factor for survival in patients treated with whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases from breast carcinomaRadiother Oncol76334339200510.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.00416024123 Le ScodanRMassardCJouanneauLCoussyFGutierrezMKirovaYLereboursFLabibAMouret-FourmeEBrain metastases from breast cancer: Proposition of new prognostic score including molecular subtypes and treatmentJ Neurooncol106169176201210.1007/s11060-011-0654-x21735114 KeizmanDIsh-ShalomMHuangPEisenbergerMAPiliRHammersHCarducciMAThe association of pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with response rate, progression free survival and overall survival of patients treated with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinomaEur J Cancer48202208201210.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.00122018713 LoghaviSAlayedKAladilyTNZuoZNgSBTangGHuSYinCCMirandaRNMedeirosLJKhouryJDStage, age, and EBV status impact outcomes of plasmablastic lymphoma patients: A clinicopathologic analysis of 61 patientsJ Hematol Oncol865201510.1186/s13045-015-0163-z26055271 KaoSCVardyJChatfieldMCortePPavlakisNClarkeCvan ZandwijkNClarkeSValidation of prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective analysis of data from patients seeking compensation from the New South Wales dust diseases boardClin Lung Cancer147077201310.1016/j.cllc.2012.03.01122658812 HanLHJiaYBSongQXWangJBWangNNChengYFPrognostic significance of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinomaAsian Pac J Cancer Prev1622452250201510.7314/APJCP.2015.16.6.224525824745 DengJZhangRPanYDingXCaiMLiuYLiuHBaoTJiaoXHaoXLiangHTumor size as a recommendable variable for accuracy of the prognostic prediction of gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis of 1,521 patientsAnn Surg Oncol22565572201510.1245/s10434-014-4014-x25155400 ParkJWLimSBKimDYJungKHHongYSChangHJChoiHSJeongSYCarcinoembryonic antigen as a predictor of pathologic response and a prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgeryInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys74810817200910.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.05719101093 HottaTTakifujiKYokoyamaSMatsudaKOkuYNasuTIedaJYamamotoNIwamotoHTakeiYImpact of the post/preoperative serum CEA ratio on the survival of patients with rectal cancerSurg Today4421062115201410.1007/s00595-014-0852-124504847 DavidsonNGKhannaSKirwanPHBircumshawDPrechemotherapy serum CA125 level as a predictor of survival outcome in epithelial carcinoma of the ovaryClin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)33236199110.1016/S0936-6555(05)81038-62001340

Overall survival based on relative lymphocyte and neutrophil counts. The continuous variables were dichotomized according to the reference values in our laboratory. The lower limit of RLC and the upper limit of RNC were 19 and 75%, respectively. RLC, relative lymphocyte count; RNC, relative neutrophil count; CI, confidence interval; Subgroup A, patients who received chemotherapy within 1 month prior to blood sampling; subgroup B, patients who received steroids at the time of blood sampling.

Patient characteristics and laboratory data (n=220).

Characteristics No. of patients %
Male gender 139 63
Age (years)
  Median 67
  Range 20–86
Type of malignancy
  Solid 189 86
  Hematological 31 14
Previous chemotherapy 150 68
Previous radiotherapy 82 37
Albumin (g/dl)
  Median 3.4
  Range 1.6–4.8
LDH (U/l)
  Median 249.5
  Range 79–6,500
TWBC (×109/l)
  Median 6.520
  Range 1.700–70.500
ALC (×109/l)
  Median 1.066
  Range 0.110–3.969
RLC (%)
  Median 16.0
  Range 1.3–55.9
ANC (×109/l)
  Median 4.693
  Range 0.656–68.174
RNC (%)
  Median 74.4
  Range 29.4–96.7
N/L ratio
  Median 4.68
  Range 0.57–74.35
L/M ratio
  Median 2.54
  Range 0.35–30.93

LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TWBC, total white blood cell count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; RLC, relative lymphocyte count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; RNC, relative neutrophil count; N/L ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; L/M ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio.

Univariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival.

All patients (n=220) Subgroup Aa (n=68) Subgroup Bb (n=49)
Variables HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value HR 95% CI P-value
TWBC (per increase of 1×109/l) 1.05 1.03–1.07 <0.001 1.05 0.97–1.14 0.217 1.02 0.99–1.05 0.114
ALC (per increase of 1×109/l) 0.55 0.40–0.74 <0.001 0.68 0.44–1.06 0.090 0.68 0.42–1.10 0.120
RLC (per 1% increase) 0.95 0.93–0.96 <0.001 0.97 0.95–0.99 0.005 0.95 0.91–0.99 0.007
ANC (per increase of 1×109/l) 1.05 1.03–1.07 <0.001 1.06 0.99–1.15 0.116 1.02 0.99–1.05 0.085
RNC (per 1% increase) 1.04 1.03–1.05 <0.001 1.02 1.00–1.03 0.021 1.04 1.01–1.07 0.010
N/L ratio (per increase of 1) 1.02 1.01–1.03 0.002 0.99 0.98–1.02 0.944 1.00 0.99–1.02 0.707
L/M ratio (per increase of 1) 0.84 0.77–0.91 <0.001 0.96 0.89–1.04 0.350 0.99 0.92–1.06 0.715

Patients who received chemotherapy within 1 month prior to blood sampling

Patients who received steroids at the time of blood sampling. TWBC, total white blood cell count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; RLC, relative lymphocyte count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; RNC, relative neutrophil count; N/L ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; L/M ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall survival in all patients (n=220).

A, RLC
Variables HR 95% CI P-value
Male vs. female gender 0.86 0.62–1.21 0.387
Age (per 1 year increase) 1.02 1.00–1.03 0.028
Hematological vs. solid tumors 0.64 0.37–1.10 0.104
Previous chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 1.58 1.07–2.34 0.021
Previous radiotherapy (yes vs. no) 1.08 0.76–1.53 0.667
Albumin (per 1 g/dl increase) 0.70 0.55–0.90 0.006
LDH (per 1 U/l increase) 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.001
RLC (per 1% increase) 0.96 0.94–0.98 <0.001
B, RNC
Variables HR 95% CI P-value
Male vs. female gender 0.87 0.63–1.22 0.427
Age (per 1 year increase) 1.01 1.00–1.03 0.053
Hematological vs. solid tumors 0.62 0.36–1.07 0.086
Previous chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 1.60 1.08–2.36 0.019
Previous radiotherapy (yes vs. no) 1.14 0.80–1.61 0.473
Albumin (per 1 g/dl increase) 0.67 0.52–0.86 0.001
LDH (per 1 U/l increase) 1.00 1.00–1.00 0.001
RNC (per 1% increase) 1.02 1.01–1.04 0.001

LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; RLC, relative lymphocyte count; RNC, relative neutrophil count; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to predict death within 5 months (n=184).

Variables AUC 95% CI P-value
TWBC 0.625 0.532–0.717   0.027
ALC 0.697 0.594–0.800 <0.001
RLC 0.777 0.694–0.861 <0.001
ANC 0.671 0.581–0.761   0.002
RNC 0.727 0.635–0.819 <0.001
N/L ratio 0.766 0.680–0.851 <0.001
L/M ratio 0.774 0.691–0.858 <0.001

TWBC, total white blood cell count; ALC, absolute lymphocyte count; RLC, relative lymphocyte count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; RNC, relative neutrophil count; N/L ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; L/M ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.