<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MCO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Molecular and Clinical Oncology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2049-9450</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2049-9469</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mco.2016.958</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MCO-0-0-958</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Implication of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by affected lymph nodes in cases with differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fujii</surname><given-names>Takaaki</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="aff"/>
<xref rid="c1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yajima</surname><given-names>Reina</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="aff"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tatsuki</surname><given-names>Hironori</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="aff"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kuwano</surname><given-names>Hiroyuki</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="aff"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-mco-0-0-958">Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-mco-0-0-958"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Dr Takaaki Fujii, Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan, E-mail: <email>ftakaaki@gunma-u.ac.jp</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2016</year></pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>247</fpage>
<lpage>251</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2016, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of positron emission tomography using <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) to detect metastatic lymph nodes in differentiated thyroid cancer. We also investigated whether certain factors, including the size of the metastasis to the lymph nodes, are associated with FDG avidity. A total of 22 consecutive patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent FDG-PET preoperatively were enrolled in this study. Lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in the final pathology in 10 of the 22 patients (45.5&#x0025;). The mean maximum standardized uptake value of the metastatic lymph nodes was 4.53 (range, 0&#x2013;23.5). The 22 cases with differentiated thyroid cancer were divided into two groups based on lymph node metastasis. Clinicopathological variables other than FDG uptake of metastatic lymph nodes were not predictors of lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy and false-negative rates of preoperative FDG-PET in the prediction of lymph node status were 40.0, 100, 72.7 and 60.0&#x0025;, respectively. The false-positive rate of FDG-PET evaluation was 0&#x0025;. The mean largest dimension of metastasis was 23.0 mm for FDG-positive cases and 10.9 mm for FDG-negative cases. There was a marked difference in the size of metastases between FDG-positive and -negative cases; however, even in patients with node metastasis &#x003E;10 mm, the false-negative rate was 50.0&#x0025;. Therefore, FDG-PET imaging was not found to be sufficient for the evaluation of lymph node status, particularly in cases with small metastases. Our findings indicate that preoperative FDG-PET evaluation of the lymph nodes cannot be considered predictive of the final pathology.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>thyroid cancer</kwd>
<kwd><sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography</kwd>
<kwd>lymph node metastasis</kwd>
<kwd>tumor size</kwd>
<kwd>maximum standardized uptake value</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The presence of lymph node metastasis is considered a risk factor for lymph node recurrence or distant metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). The success of surgery for thyroid cancer depends on accurate preoperative imaging, which enables complete clearance of metastatic lymph nodes (<xref rid="b2-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Ultrasound remains the most important imaging modality in the evaluation of thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). In recent years, the clinical applications using positron emission tomography (PET) have increased significantly. PET with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is a non-invasive whole-body imaging technique used to evaluate various types of malignancies, including thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b7-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>), in terms of tumor staging, restaging, detection of recurrence and monitoring treatment response (<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). However, there are limited data regarding the role of FDG-PET in preoperative staging of thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b7-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b10-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). Only a limited number of previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of PET in detecting preoperative lymph node metastasis, and it has been reported that PET does not improve the management or outcome of thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b11-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b13-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). For the evaluation of affected lymph nodes in thyroid cancer, an understanding of FDG avidity is important. Several studies evaluated factors associated with the FDG avidity of the primary thyroid tumor in cases with thyroid cancer, and the thyroid tumor size has been reported to be associated with a higher likelihood of positive FDG uptake (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). However, to date, there has been no study assessing the factors associated with FDG avidity of the affected lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of FDG-PET for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in differentiated thyroid cancer. Furthermore, we investigated whether certain factors, including the size of metastasis to the lymph nodes, were associated with FDG avidity.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="subjects|methods">
<title>Patients and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patients</title>
<p>A total of 22 consecutive patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent FDG-PET preoperatively were enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent thyroidectomy at the Department of Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University (Maebashi, Japan) from January 2008 to December 2014. Patients with incomplete clinical information were excluded. None of the patients had distant metastasis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Thyroid cancer detection and evaluation</title>
<p>Most cases of thyroid cancer in this study were detected by PET during evaluation for other cancers. PET images were qualitatively examined by expert nuclear radiologists. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were calculated according to a routine clinical method. Thyroid nodule size, size of metastatic foci to the lymph nodes, age, and serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroglobulin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were investigated as possible predictors of lymph node metastasis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The Fisher&#x0027;s exact test, &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test and Student&#x0027;s t-test were used to compare benign and malignant groups. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P&#x003C;0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Measures of the effectiveness of preoperative FDG-PET in the prediction of lymph node status</title>
<p>The mean SUVmax of metastatic lymph nodes was 4.53 (range, 0&#x2013;23.5). As shown in <xref rid="tI-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>, the sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy and false-negative rates for FDG uptake in the prediction of lymph node status were 40.0, 100, 72.7 and 60.0&#x0025;, respectively. The false-positive rate of FDG-PET evaluation for lymph node status was 0&#x0025;.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient and clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis and FDG uptake</title>
<p>The mean age of the patients was 58.6&#x00B1;13.8 years and 4 of the 22 patients were men. The mean size of the thyroid nodules was 15.8&#x00B1;8.3 mm. Lymph node metastasis was diagnosed in the final pathology in 10 of the 22 patients (45.5&#x0025;). The 22 cases with differentiated thyroid cancer were divided into two groups based on lymph node metastasis. The patient characteristics and the results of the univariate analysis conducted to determine the association between the clinicopathological variables and lymph node metastasis are shown in <xref rid="tII-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>. These clinicopathological variables, apart from the FDG uptake of metastatic lymph nodes, were not predictors of lymph node metastasis from thyroid cancer. The 10 cases with lymph node metastasis were divided into two groups based on the presence of FDG uptake in the lymph nodes (<xref rid="f1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). The patient characteristics and the results of the univariate analysis conducted to determine the association between the clinicopathological variables and FDG uptake in the lymph nodes are shown in <xref rid="tIII-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>. None of the clinicopathological characteristics of the primary tumor, including size and SUVmax, were significantly associated with FDG uptake. However, the clinicopathological characteristics of the metastatic lymph nodes were significantly associated with FDG uptake in the lymph nodes. The analysis revealed that the size of the node metastasis was a statistically significant factor, although the number of lymph node metastases was not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>FDG-PET results and size of lymph node metastasis</title>
<p>The association of metastatic tumor size in the lymph nodes and FDG-PET evaluation results (i.e., positive or negative) is shown in <xref rid="f2-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>. The mean largest dimension of metastatic tumors was 23.0 mm for FDG-positive and 10.9 mm for FDG-negative cases. Thus, a significantly larger size of metastatic tumors was observed in FDG-positive nodes compared with that in FDG-negative nodes (P&#x003C;0.01). However, despite this marked difference in the size of the metastases, the false-negative rate was still 50.0&#x0025; in patients with node metastases sized &#x003E;10 mm.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>FDG-PET has been widely used for diagnosing, staging, or detecting recurrence in various types of cancer; however, its diagnostic usefulness for thyroid cancer is controversial (<xref rid="b1-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Regarding thyroid nodules, there are several reports of preoperative evaluation with FDG-PET, and it is generally considered that FDG-PET is of limited value in predicting thyroid cancer outcome (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Furthermore, there are limited data regarding the role of FDG-PET in detecting preoperative lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b11-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b13-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). Clinically, FDG-PET is not generally used for the primary diagnosis of thyroid cancer. However, as FDG-PET is becoming a commonly used imaging modality, the number of thyroid lesions incidentally detected by FDG-PET is increasing. We previously demonstrated that the risk of thyroid cancer in patients with PET incidentaloma was relatively high (<xref rid="b5-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). Previous studies evaluated the factors associated with the FDG avidity of the primary tumor in thyroid cancer (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>), but there has been no study assessing the factors associated with FDG avidity of the affected lymph nodes. Thus, the present study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of FDG-PET evaluation of lymph node metastases for patients with thyroid cancer. The key observations made in this study may be summarized as follows: i) The sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy and false-negative rates of preoperative FDG-PET evaluation in the prediction of lymph node status were 40.0, 100, 72.7 and 60.0&#x0025;, respectively; ii) the size of node metastasis, but not their number, was associated with FDG uptake in the lymph nodes; and iii) the false-positive rate of FDG-PET evaluation of lymph node metastasis was 0&#x0025;; however, even in the patient group with node metastasis sized &#x003E;10 mm, the false-negative rate was 50&#x0025;.</p>
<p>SUVmax is used as a semi-quantitative indicator of FDG uptake, but it is sometimes difficult to obtain a reliable value with only one FDG-PET imaging, as SUVmax is affected by several factors, including glucose transporter expression, viable cell number, tumor perfusion and inflammatory cells (<xref rid="b5-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b16-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Several studies have reported that SUVmax is correlated with the size of the thyroid nodule to a certain extent (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>), according to the resolution of the PET scanner, known as the partial volume effect (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b18-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). However, there has been no study assessing the factors associated with FDG avidity of affected lymph nodes. A few previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PET in lymph node metastasis. In this study, we evaluated the association between the size of lymph node metastasis and the FDG avidity of lymph nodes. There was a significant correlation between FDG uptake and the size of lymph node metastasis; however, even in the patient group with node metastasis &#x003E;10 mm, the false-negative rate was 50&#x0025;. Therefore, FDG-PET evaluation of lymph node metastasis is not predictive of small metastasis or micrometastasis.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in the present study, the false-positive rate of FDG-PET evaluation of lymph node metastasis was 0&#x0025;. Thus, in cases with FDG uptake by the lymph nodes, macrometastasis to the lymph node is highly suspected. However, the size of lymph node metastases does not always reflect lymphatic spread; thus, FDG-PET imaging was not sufficient for the evaluation of lymphatic spread. This study has potential limitations, the major one being that it was a retrospective analysis and the number of cases was relatively small. However, the clinical implications of the data we obtained on FDG avidity are very important. However, additional research is required to elucidate this putative association between FDG-PET evaluation and lymph node metastasis.</p>
<p>Inflammation also increases FDG uptake and, therefore, SUVmax (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). CRP is an acknowledged marker of inflammation reflecting a systemic inflammatory response, and the measurement of serum CRP levels is an easily available test. However, recent clinical evidence suggests that FDG-PET is more accurate in detecting thyroid cancer at high rather than at low TSH levels (<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-958" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). In this study, there was no correlation between SUVmax and either CRP or TSH level in lymph node metastasis.</p>
<p>In conclusion, we demonstrated that preoperative FDG-PET evaluation of lymph nodes is not effective in predicting node status. Even in cases with relatively large (&#x003E;10 mm) node metastases, FDG-PET imaging was not sufficient for the evaluation of lymph node status. The positive predictive value is high, but our findings suggest that preoperative FDG-PET evaluation of lymph node is not predictive of the final pathology.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The authors would like to thank Saitoh Y, Yano T, Matsui Y, Ishida A and Yamamoto A for their secretarial assistance.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-mco-0-0-958"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Byun</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>UG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Min</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chong</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bom</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prediction of central lymph node metastasis from papillary thyroid microcaprcinoma by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and ultrasonography</article-title><source>Ann Nucl Med</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>471</fpage><lpage>477</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12149-012-0594-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22467230</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-mco-0-0-958"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Bauer</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernet</surname><given-names>VA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferris</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Loevner</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandel</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Orloff</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Randolph</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name><name><surname>Steward</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>American Thyroid Association Surgical Affairs Committee Writing Task Force: American Thyroid Association statement on preoperative imaging for thyroid cancer surgery</article-title><source>Thyroid</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2014.0096</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25188202</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-mco-0-0-958"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pak</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>IJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeon</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in differentiated thyroid cancer before surgery</article-title><source>Endocr Relat Cancer</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>R203</fpage><lpage>R213</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1530/ERC-13-0088</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23722225</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-mco-0-0-958"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kresnik</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallowitsch</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mikosch</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Stettner</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Igerc</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumnig</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Lind</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of thyroid nodules in an endemic goiter area</article-title><source>Surgery</source><volume>133</volume><fpage>294</fpage><lpage>299</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1067/msy.2003.71</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12660642</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-mco-0-0-958"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fujii</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yajima</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamaguchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsutsumi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Asao</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuwano</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Is it possible to predict malignancy in cases with focal thyroid incidentaloma identified by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography?</article-title><source>Am Surg</source><volume>78</volume><fpage>141</fpage><lpage>143</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22273333</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-mco-0-0-958"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Yen</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>YY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Detecting metastatic neck lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma by <sup>18</sup>F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Tc-99m tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>2973</fpage><lpage>2976</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12926147</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-mco-0-0-958"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marcus</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Whitworth</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Surasi</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Pai</surname><given-names>SI</given-names></name><name><surname>Subramaniam</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>PET/CT in the management of thyroid cancers</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><volume>202</volume><fpage>1316</fpage><lpage>1329</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.13.11673</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24848831</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-mco-0-0-958"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical significance of thyroid uptake on F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography</article-title><source>Ann Nucl Med</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12149-008-0198-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19205834</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-mco-0-0-958"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fletcher</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Djulbegovic</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Soares</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Siegel</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowe</surname><given-names>VJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyman</surname><given-names>GH</given-names></name><name><surname>Coleman</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahl</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Paschold</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Avril</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Recommendations on the use of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in oncology</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>480</fpage><lpage>508</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2967/jnumed.107.047787</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18287273</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-mco-0-0-958"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Urhan</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Velioglu</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenbaum</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Alavi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Imaging for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer</article-title><source>Expert Opin Med diagn</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>237</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1517/17530050902773513</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23488460</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-mco-0-0-958"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Koo</surname><given-names>BS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Characteristics of primary papillary thyroid carcinoma with false-negative findings on initial <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>1306</fpage><lpage>1311</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-010-1469-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21140231</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-mco-0-0-958"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Baek</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Son</surname><given-names>YI</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Baek</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for the initial evaluation of cervical node level of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT</article-title><source>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>402</fpage><lpage>407</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02612.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16918964</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-mco-0-0-958"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morita</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizoguchi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Iizuka</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The accuracy of [<sup>18</sup> F]-fluoro-2-deoxy D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography, ultrasonography, and enhanced computed tomography alone in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma</article-title><source>World J Surg</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>2564</fpage><lpage>2569</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00268-010-0733-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20645089</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-mco-0-0-958"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohba</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishizawa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsushita</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Inubushi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagayama</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwaki</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsunaga</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasaki</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Oki</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>High incidence of thyroid cancer in focal thyroid incidentaloma detected by <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose [corrected] positron emission tomography in relatively young healthy subjects: Results of 3-year follow-up</article-title><source>Endocr J</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>395</fpage><lpage>401</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1507/endocrj.K10E-008</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20160400</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-mco-0-0-958"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bae</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Chae</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Incidental tyroid lesions detected by FDG-PET/CT: Prevalence and risk of thyroid cancer</article-title><source>World J Surg Oncol</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>63</fpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1477-7819-7-63</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19664272</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-mco-0-0-958"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shim</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>OJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Baek</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>BT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Focal thyroid lesions incidentally identified by integrated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT: Clinical significance and improved characterization</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>609</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16595494</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-mco-0-0-958"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsuzu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Segade</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuzu</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Carter</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowden</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrier</surname><given-names>ND</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Differential expression of glucose transporters in normal and pathologic thyroid tissue</article-title><source>Thyroid</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>806</fpage><lpage>812</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2004.14.806</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15588375</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-mco-0-0-958"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hoffman</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Phelps</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size</article-title><source>J Comput Assist Tomogr</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>299</fpage><lpage>308</lpage><year>1979</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00004728-197906000-00001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">438372</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-mco-0-0-958"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deichen</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Prante</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Maschauer</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuwert</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of TSH on uptake of [<sup>18</sup>F]fluorodeoxyglucose in human thyroid cells in vitro</article-title><source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>507</fpage><lpage>512</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-003-1401-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14722674</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-mco-0-0-958" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Examples of focal <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by lymph nodes on positron emission tomography-computed tomography in a 61-year-old male patient. FDG uptake in a (A) thyroid nodule [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) = 4.7] and (B) lymph node (SUVmax = 6.6). Papillary carcinoma with lymph node metastasis was histopathologically confirmed.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-05-03-0247-g00.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-mco-0-0-958" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of the results of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake-positive and -negative cases regarding the size of lymph node metastasis. The mean largest dimension of metastatic tumors was 23.0 mm for FDG-positive and 10.9 mm for FDG-negative cases (P&#x003C;0.01). In the patient group with node metastasis &#x003E;10 mm as the cut-off point, the false-negative rate was 50&#x0025;.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-05-03-0247-g01.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-mco-0-0-958" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption><p>Measures of the effectiveness of preoperative positron emission tomography with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose in the prediction of lymph node status.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Measures</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">No./total (&#x0025;)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sensitivity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4/10 (40.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Specificity</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12/12 (100.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Accuracy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16/22 (72.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">False-negative rate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6/10 (60.0)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-mco-0-0-958" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption><p>Patient and clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Lymph node metastasis</th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Absent (n=12)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Present (n=10)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age, years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">59.0&#x00B1;14.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">58.1&#x00B1;13.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.792</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.956</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Primary tumor size, mm</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.7&#x00B1;7.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15.8&#x00B1;8.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.311</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">SUVmax of primary tumor</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.5&#x00B1;12.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.4&#x00B1;4.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.634</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">FDG uptake in lymph nodes, n (&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0 (0.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4 (40.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TSH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.25&#x00B1;0.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.81&#x00B1;1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tg</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">170.9&#x00B1;421.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">109.1&#x00B1;134.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.450</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CRP</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.10&#x00B1;0.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.17&#x00B1;0.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.721</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-mco-0-0-958"><p>Values are expressed as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; FDG, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; Tg, thyroglobulin; CRP, C-reactive protein.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-mco-0-0-958" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption><p>Patient and clinicopathological characteristics associated with FDG uptake in the lymph nodes.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">FDG uptake in axillary lymph nodes</th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Present (n=4)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Absent (n=6)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age, years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67.8&#x00B1;15.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51.7&#x00B1;6.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.024</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Gender</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TSH</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.67&#x00B1;1.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.81&#x00B1;1.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.637</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tg</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">145.4&#x00B1;176.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">84.9&#x00B1;110.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.259</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">CRP</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.06&#x00B1;0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.22&#x00B1;0.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.723</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Primary tumor</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Histology</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Papillary carcinoma</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor size, mm</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.5&#x00B1;10.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18.0&#x00B1;6.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.834</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;SUVmax</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.8&#x00B1;6.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.6&#x00B1;2.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.236</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Extrathyroidal extention, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.667</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lymph node metastasis</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor size, mm</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23.0&#x00B1;9.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.7&#x00B1;4.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Number of node metastases</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.8&#x00B1;2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.2&#x00B1;2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.717</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn2-mco-0-0-958"><p>Values are expressed as mean &#x00B1; standard deviation. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; FDG, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; Tg, thyroglobulin; CRP, C-reactive protein.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
