Mutations of BRAF oncogene are common in cutaneous melanomas, being found in as much as 50% of the total number of cases. Most mutations involve exon 15, exon 11 being interested in less than 1% of cases (1). V600E in exon 15 is by far the most common (2). This mutation modifies the spatial structure of activation P-loop, causing a 500-fold increase in BRAF kinase activity and facilitating the acquisition of secondary genetic events in cancer progression (3). Target therapy for cutaneous melanomas is focused on this mutation: small molecules (vemurafenib and dabrafenib) act as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs), and interrupt the BRAF/MEK step in RAS/MEK/ERK pathway, inducing apoptosis in mutated cells (4). Less frequent BRAF mutations (5,6) with alterations in the same crucial site, such as Threonine599 and Serine601 (7), have been described. Herein, we report a single case of primary cutaneous melanoma showing a mutation occurring in the P-loop activating site (c.1797_1798insACA, T599insT), which was not previously described in melanomas, but only rarely found in Pilocytic Astrocytoma (PA), Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma (PTC) and Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma (ATC) (8–11). In silico and in vitro data indicate that rare and/or complex mutations in codons 599–601 increase kinase activity similarly to the typical V600E (8,9,12,13).

Α 88-year-old female was presented with large, ulcerated superficial spreading melanoma on the left cheek, including a nodular polypoid component, widely ulcerated, with regression arising from a radial growth phase pigmented macula. Histologic examination showed a T4 lesion, Clark level V, with invasion into the subcutaneous fat (Fig. 1A). Angiolymphatic and perineural invasion were also described and a mitotic rate of 20/mm² was detected. Melanoma cells were epithelioid and spindle-shaped with marked pleomorphism. Sporadic monster cells were also observed (Fig. 1B-D). Specimen resulted strongly positive with S-100 protein (4C4.9), anti-Melanosome (HMB-45) (Fig. 1D) and Melan-A (A103) immunostaining, weakly and focally for MiTF (C5/D5). Proliferative index, detected by Ki67 (30-9 clone), was ~55%. Abdominal ultrasound showed liver metastases. The patient died six months after diagnosis due to melanoma progression and a co-morbidity (renal failure). BRAF mutational status of the primary lesion was assessed by both Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing, using the Anti-EGFR MoAb response BRAF Status kit (Diatech S.p.A., Jesi, Italy). Genetic analysis showed a rare aminoacidic insertion in codon 599 of the BRAF gene (1797_1798insACA, T599insT: Fig. 2) (GenBank NM_004333), resulting in a duplication of the same codon and an additional Threonine in the protein sequence (NCBI Ref Seq: NP_004324.2).

T599dup mutation was first described as associated to PA (8,13,14), and eventually found in PTC and ATC (10–12). Although in this study and in cited reports (8,10–14) all mutations lead to the same T599dup alteration at amino acid level, at DNA level they are described as an ACA duplication (11,12), and as an insertion of TAC between C and A in the other studies. In silico analysis, performed on BRAFV599ins and BRAFT599insT (9,12), indicates that mutations involving the P-loop make the active geometrical conformation more stable than the wild-type counterpart, causing an highly productive catalytic state. In vitro kinase assays carried out on BRAFV599ins and BRAFV600E (9) revealed a three-to-five-fold increase in the enzymatic activity (BRAF-induced phosphorylation of MEK and MAPK) of both mutants compared to BRAFWT. Similarly, evaluation of BRAFT599insT (8,13) confirmed the tumorigenic potential of this mutation. The two cited TKIs are not currently employed in treatment of tumors other than advanced and metastatic melanoma. Their potential use in different clinical settings is being studied for lesions carrying the V600E mutation (clinical trial NCI-2013-01160), which is the target of TKIs. Thus, no data about the effectiveness of targeted therapy on rare BRAF mutations are available. In the described case, unfortunately the patient died only weeks after the genetic tests were performed. The potential response to BRAF inhibitors in presence of this mutation remains a matter for further studies.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.