XG-d, with a purity >99%, was purchased from Shanghai Boyle Chemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Standard stock solution (10 mg/ml) were prepared with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and diluted to the indicated concentrations with basal medium [RPMI-1640 (Gibco Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Dulbecco's modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) and DMEM/F-12 medium (HyClone, GE Healthcare Life Science, Little Chalfont, UK)] prior to each experiment. 5-FU was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH (1:5,000–10,000; G8795) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The following primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA): Rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-3 (1:1,000; #9662S), mouse monoclonal anti-caspase-9 (1:1,000; #9508S), rabbit polyclonal anti-poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP; 1:1,000; #9542S), rabbit monoclonal anti-Bcl-2 (1:500; #2870S) and rabbit polyclonal anti-Bax (1:1,000; #2772S). Horseradish peroxide-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig)G (1:5,000; sc-2005) and goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5,000; sc-2004) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

The A549 human lung carcinoma cell line, HK-2 human proximal tubule epithelial cell line and HT-29 human colon carcinoma cell line were obtained from The American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The C26 murine colon carcinoma cell line and L02 human liver cell line were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The A549 and HT-29 cell lines were cultured in DMEM, the C26 and L02 cell lines were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium and the HK-2 cell line was cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium. All cell culture mediums were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Auckland, New Zealand), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.

Female BALB/c mice (4–6 weeks old) with body weights ranging from 18–22 g were purchased from Chengdu Dashuo Biotechnology Co, Ltd (Chengdu, China). The present study was approved by the ethics committee of the Institutional Animal Care and Treatment Committee of Sichuan University (Sichuan, China). The animal room was controlled to maintain temperature (22±2°C), light (12 h light/dark cycles) and humidity (50±10%).

Cell viability was measured using a cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) kit (Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cells were seeded into 96-well culture plates (Costar Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 4,000 cells/well. Following incubation overnight, the cells were treated with various concentrations of XG-d (2.5, 5, 10, 20 or 40 μg/ml). DMSO (<0.1%) was used as an untreated control. Following 48 h of incubation at 37°C, 10 μl CCK-8 solution was added to each well and incubated for 3 h, prior to the measurement of the absorbance at 450 nm using a SpectraMax M5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (HyClone) for ~20 min at room temperature. The fixed cells were subsequently stained with Hoechst 33258 (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China) at 37°C for 15 min, washed with PBS twice and the changes in the nuclei were examined using a fluorescence microscope (uX71;Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

In order to evaluate the cell cycle distribution following drug treatment, the DNA contents were analyzed using flow cytometry. Following treatment with the drug for 24 h, the cells were harvested, washed once with PBS and fixed using 70% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C overnight. Following centrifugation at 600 × g for 5 min, the cells were analyzed using a Cell Cycle and Apoptosis analysis kit (Biyuntian Biotechnology Co., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were analyzed using a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)can flow cytometer (Navios; Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).

XG-d was prefixed with a mixed solution of 3% glutaraldehyde (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd) and then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in series of acetone solutions, infiltrated in Epox 812 (Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for approximately 3 h and were subsequently embedded. The semi-thin sections (0.6~0.8 μm; used in for optical positioning) were cut with a slicer and stained with methylene blue (Sigma-Aldrich) and ultra-thin sections (<0.1 μm; used for observation) were cut using a diamond knife (Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology Co., Ltd.), then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were then examined using a transmission electron microscope (H-600IV; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

The C26 cells were treated with XG-d for 24 h, harvested and washed three times with PBS. The apoptotic assay was performed using an annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/PI apoptosis kit (KeyGEN, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were resuspended in 500 μl binding buffer and 5 μl Annexin V-FITC and PI were added. The cells were subsequently incubated for 15 min in the dark and the samples were measured using a fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)can flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).

The cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Biyuntian Bitechnology Co., Shanghai, China), containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride and 50 mM NaF for 20 min on ice. Subsequently, the cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 × g at 4°C. The total protein in the supernatants was determined using a Bicinchoninic Acid Protein Assay kit (Biyuntian Biotechnology, Co.). Equal quantities of protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) by electroblotting. The membrane was then blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h and was incubated with primary antibodies for PARP (1:1,000), caspase-9 (1:1,000), caspase-3 (1:1,000), Bcl-2 (1:500), Bax (1:500) and GAPDH (1:5,000–10,000), as described above, at 4°C overnight (>18 h). Following washing, the blots were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (1:5,000) at room temperature for 1 h, with agitation. The reactive bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence using either SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The C26 cells (1.0×10⁶) were subcutaneously implanted in the right flank region of the BALB/c mice (21). Seven days following implantation, the mice with tumor sizes >50 mm³ were selected and randomly divided into three groups (n=10 per group), termed the vehicle control, XG-d and positive groups. These groups were treated with 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium (Aladdin Industrial, Inc., Shanghai, China), 100 mg/kg XG-d and 30 mg/kg 5-FU (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd), respectively, the concentrations of which were determined in a preliminary study. Equal volumes of the drugs and vehicle were administered orally to the mice every day for 3 weeks. The body weight (MP5002 Electronic balance; Shanghai Sunny Henping Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and tumor size were measured twice weekly and the tumor volumes were calculated using the formula 0.52 × a × b², where ‘a’ represented the long diameter and ‘b’ represented the short diameter. At the end of the treatment, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the tumors were excised and weighed.

All the values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by Scheffe's test for multiple comparisons. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

The effects of XG-d on the proliferation of various cell lines were determined using a CCK-8 assay. The cell viability was examined in three carcinomatosis cell lines (A549, C26 and HT-29) and two normal cell lines (HK-2 and L-02), which had been treated with various concentrations of XG-d (2.5, 5, 10, 20 or 40 μg/ml) for 48 h. XG-d significantly inhibited the proliferation of the C26 cells and had less marked effects on the A549 and HT-29 cancer cell lines and the L02 and HK-2 normal cell lines (Fig. 1A). The inhibitory effect of XG-d on C26 growth at various concentrations were similar after 24 and 48 h incubation (P>0.05); therefore, a duration of 24 h was used in the subsequent investigations (Fig. 1B).

DNA cell cycle analysis was used to examine the effects of XG-d on the growth of the C26 cells. The C26 cells were incubated with various concentrations of XG-d for 24 h. As shown in Fig 2, compared with the control group, the G₀/G₁ phase was significantly increased between 42.74 and 64.56%, while the number of cells in the S phase gradually decreased between 30.19 and 10.77% in the XG-d-treated group with increasing XG-d concentration.

In order to investigate how XG-d inhibited cell viability, cell morphology was examined. As shown in Fig. 3A, morphological changes were observed in the C26 cells following treatment with XG-d for 24 h. Notably, the control cells emitted light blue fluorescence and the nuclei were round, suggesting that the chromatin was equivalently distributed. However, the XG-d-treated cells exhibited shrinkage, chromatin congregation and nuclear fragmentation.

Subsequently, a transmission electronic microscope was used to identify morphological changes in the ultrastructure of the C26 cells. No clear damage was observed in the control group (Fig. 3Ba), however, the XG-d-treated group exhibited chromatin congregation, nucleic degeneration and cytoplasm shrinkage, while the nuclear envelope and cell membrane remained intact (Fig. 3Bb). These results suggested that XG-d was capable of inducing apoptosis in the C26 cells.

Flow cytometric analysis using an Annexin V-FITC apoptosis kit was used to identify the levels of apoptosis induced by XG-d in the C26 cells. As indicated in Fig. 4A, the C26 cells were exposed to various concentrations of XG-d (5, 10 or 20 μg/ml) for 24 h. The percentage of early apoptotic cells increased to 15.4%, while the percentage of late apoptotic cells and necrotic cells increased to 15.4% following treatment with 20 μg/ml XG-d, compared with the control group. A significant increase in the apoptotic rate was induced in the XG-d treated groups compared with the untreated group (P<0.05; Fig. 4B). The results indicated that XG-d induced apoptosis in the C26 cells.

To evaluate the potential pathways responsible for the effects of XG-d, the expression of key apoptosis-associated proteins in C26 cells were examined (Fig. 5). PARP, a nuclear enzyme involved in DNA repair, was cleaved into 89 kDa fragments. Caspase-9 and caspase-3 were also cleaved and accumulated following XG-d treatment. Furthermore, the expression of Bcl-2 was decreased, while the expression levels of Bax were upregulated. These results indicated that XG-d induced the caspase-dependent and mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathways.

In the present study, a mouse tumor model of colon cancer was used to examine the effect of XG-d on tumor growth in vivo. Each mice was subcutaneously injected with 1.0×10⁶ C26 cells. Following establishment of the tumor (~50 mm³), the anti-tumor effects of oral administration of 100 mg/kg XG-d to the mice were evaluated. Oral administration of 5-FU (30 mg/kg) was used as a positive control and oral administration of 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium was used as the normal control. As indicated in Fig. 6A, after 3 weeks treatment, the average tumor size in the vehicle control group was 834.8±284.1 mm³, whereas the average tumor size in the XG-d- and 5-FU-treated groups were 436.8±114.1 and 138.9±31.3 mm³, respectively. The weight of the mice was also measured over the course of the treatment period. No significant difference was observed between the body weights of the vehicle control or XG-d-treated groups, however, the body weights of the mice in the 5-FU-treated group were decreased (Fig. 6B). The tumor weight of the XG-d- and 5-FU-treated mice after 3 weeks of treatment were significantly reduced compared with that of the vehicle control (Fig. 6C). These results revealed that the oral administration of XG-d inhibited C26 cell tumor growth.