OL Oncology Letters 1792-1074 1792-1082 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ol.2016.4245 OL-0-0-4245 Articles Association between overexpression of Wip1 and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer ZHAOMIN 1 2 ZHANGHONGBIN 2 ZHUGUIYUN 3 LIANGJIAN 2 CHENNING 3 YANGYONGHUI 3 LIANGXIANGCUN 2 CAIHONGMEI 2 LIUWEI 1 4 Department of Oncology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, P.R. China Department of Lung Oncology, Hebei Chest Hospital, Research Center of Hebei Lung Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050041, P.R. China Department of Pathology, Hebei Chest Hospital, Research Center of Hebei Lung Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050041, P.R. China Department of Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050012, P.R. China Correspondence to: Professor Wei Liu, Department of Oncology, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, P.R. China, E-mail: hebeiliuwei@hotmail.com 04 2016 18 02 2016 11 4 2365 2370 06012015 28012016 Copyright: © Zhao et al. 2016 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1), also termed PPM1D, is a member of the protein phosphatase 2C family, which is characterized by distinctive oncogenic properties. Overexpression of Wip1 is observed in certain types of human tumors that are associated with significantly poor prognosis. The present study aimed to detect the expression of Wip1 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to analyze its prognostic value in such patients. The protein expression level of Wip1 was compared between NSCLC and normal lung tissue specimens using by immunohistochemistry, and it was found that Wip1 was highly expressed in NSCLCs but was absent or weakly expressed in normal lung tissues. Detailed clinical and demographic information of patients were retrospectively collected pre- and postoperatively, and Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox's regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognosis of patients. Survival analysis revealed that the overall survival rate for patients in the Wip1-positive expression group was significantly lower than that of the Wip1-negative group, and Cox multivariate analysis indicated that positive Wip1 expression, pN classification and pathological stage were significant prognostic predictors. The results of the current study suggest that Wip1 may be associated with pathological diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of NSCLC.

 wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 lung cancer non-small cell lung carcinoma prognosis Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and can be categorized into two major histopathological groups: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (1). Approximately 80% of cases of human lung cancer are NSCLC, which itself can be subcategorized into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma (2). Current treatments, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery, for NSCLC exhibit limited effectiveness and the prognosis remains poor, with an overall 5-year survival rate of only 15% (3). The poor outcome of lung cancer is primarily explained by the difficulty of early detection and anatomic localization of the tumors (4). Therefore, the identification of biomarkers that are expressed in NSCLC is important to elucidate the critical molecular events of these tumors, to accurately predict patient prognosis and to identify the most suitable pathways to target using novel therapeutic agents. A number of independent prognostic factors have been suggested for predicting survival and aiding in the management of patients with lung cancer (5).

Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1), also termed PPM1D, is a member of the protein phosphatase 2C family (6). It was originally identified in Burkitt's lymphoma cells during a screen for p53 target genes induced by ionizing radiation (7). Subsequently, Wip1 has been implicated as a negative regulator of p53 via its ability to attenuate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity. Wip1 dephosphorylates at least six proteins: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated, checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), Chk2, p53, p38 and Mdm2 (8). These proteins are DNA damage response markers and there expression is commonly decreased in DNA damage response pathways, which contribute to cancer progression (8,9). Previous studies have demonstrated that Wip1 is characterized by distinctive oncogenic properties and is overexpressed in a wide range of tumor tissues (10–14), including lung adenocarcinoma (15). However, previous studies have not investigated the expression of Wip1 in different types of NSCLC or the association between Wip1 expression and overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC.

The present study aimed to detect the expression of Wip1 in NSCLC tissues and to analyze its prognostic value in patients with NSCLC. Wip1 protein expression was detected in 117 NSCLC and 15 normal lung tissue samples using immunohistochemistry. Detailed clinical and demographic information was retrospectively collected from the patients up to 5 years after surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox's regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognosis of these patients.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>Tumor specimens

A total of 117 patients with NSCLC were admitted for surgical treatment at the Hebei Chest Hospital (Shijiazhuang, China) between January 2001 and December 2010. The cohort included 87 male and 30 female patients with a mean age of 56.9 years. Only the NSCLC patients with no metastasis and suitable for surgery were included in the present study. In addition, no patients received any treatment, including radiation or chemotherapy, prior to the surgery. Demographic and pathological tumor characteristics of the patients were collected prior to the initial surgery. Normal lung tissue samples (n=15) were obtained from patients who undergone bronchiectasis surgery. These samples were dehydrated in an alcohol series (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) (75% for 1 h, 85% for 1 h, 95% for 4 h and 100% for 2 h), cleaned in xylene (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) and embedded in paraffin (Wanyao Chemical Technology Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang, China) to prepare 5 µm serial paraffin sections, and then stained by hematoxylin and eosin solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and confirmed as normal using light microscopy (DM IL LED; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). According to the World Health Organization classification system (16), tumor specimens were histopathologically diagnosed by two or more experienced pathologists as adenocarcinoma (n=53), squamous cell carcinoma (n=44), adenosquamous carcinoma (n=9), large cell carcinoma (n=6) and sarcomatoid carcinoma (n=5). According to the TNM staging system (17), the specimens represented 25 pathological (p)-Stage I, 20 p-Stage II, 65 p-Stage III and 7 p-Stage IV tumors. The histological type and grade were confirmed by microscopic examination (DM IL LED; Leica Microsystems GmbH) of hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue slides (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All patients were consecutively enrolled in this study, and prognostic factors and disease progression were retrospectively collected. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hebei Chest Hospital (Shijiazhuang, China) and informed consent was obtained from all recruited subjects.

 Immunohistochemistry

The tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), hydrated with 100% and 95% ethanol (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.), and then rinsed in distilled water. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.1% H2O2 (Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for 20 min. The sections were prepared by microwave antigen retrieval in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0; Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 10 min. The slides were subsequently incubated with serum blocking solution (Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 1 h at 37°C, rabbit anti-human polyclonal anti-Wip1 primary antibody (catalog no., SC-20712; 1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) overnight at 4°C, goat anti-rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody (catalog no., ZB2010; dilution, 1:100; Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 1 h at 37°C and streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine solution (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a chromogen. The slides were then counterstained in a hematoxylin solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and visualized on the DM IL LED microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH). Negative controls were performed by omitting the primary antibody incubation step.

 Scoring of immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining of the tissues was graded semi-quantitatively considering the staining intensity results determined by two pathologists that were blinded to the clinicopathological variables. The staining intensity was scored using the following scale of four grades: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining; 2, moderate staining; and 3, strong staining of cancer cells. Wip1 expression in the cancer tissue was defined as positive when the staining intensity score was 2 or 3.

 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The associations between Wip1 expression and categorical variables were analyzed by Pearson's χ2 test; excluding age, which was analyzed by Student's t-test. The survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the statistical significance between survival curves was assessed using the log-rank test. OS was determined from the date of surgery to the date of mortality. Significant variables from the univariate analysis were entered into the Cox proportional hazard model. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference and all tests were two-sided.

 Results <sec> <title>Wip1 expression in NSCLC by immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of Wip1 protein in the NSCLC tissues. In the normal lung tissues, the expression of Wip1 was not detected or was weakly expressed (Fig. 1A). However, cytoplasmic staining was observed in the human NSCLC tissue samples (Fig. 1B–D). Scoring of the immunohistochemical slides revealed positive Wip1 expression (immunostaining score, 2/3) in 69.3% (81/117) of NSCLC samples. Weak Wip1 expression (immunostaining score, 0/1) was observed in 30.7% (36/117) of NSCLC samples (Table I).

 Association between Wip1 expression, and demographic and pathological factors of NSCLC

Statistical analysis using the χ2 test identified that of the status of Wip1 expression was correlated with demographic and pathological factors of the tumors (Table II). Notably, Wip1 overexpression was predominantly observed in lung adenocarcinoma compared with other histological subtypes of NSCLC (P<0.01; Table II); in p-Stage III–IV compared with p-Stage I–II (P=0.045); and in pT2–4 tumors compared with pT1 tumors (P=0.004). However, no statistically significant correlation was identified between Wip1 expression and the other demographic and pathological factors of NSCLC analyzed, such as age, gender, histological differentiation or pN classification (Table II).

 Overexpression of Wip1 correlates with the poor prognosis of NSCLC

The OS of Wip1-negative and Wip1-positive groups were examined. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed using the log-rank test. The survival of Wip1-negative patients was significantly longer than that observed for the Wip1-positive patients (45.6 and 18.5% 5-year survival rate, respectively; P=0.014; Fig. 2).

Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard model) for age, gender, histological differentiation, TNM stage and overexpression of Wip1 was performed to examine the association between possible prognostic factors and survival (Table III). It was identified that the pN classification (P=0.022), p-Stage (P=0.013) and Wip1 overexpression (P=0.009) were statistically significant predictors for OS (Table III).

 Discussion

The present study determined that: i) Wip1 is highly expressed in NSCLCs; ii) the OS rate for patients in the Wip1-positive expression group was significantly lower than that of the Wip1-negative group, as determined by survival analysis; and iii) positive Wip1 expression, pN classification and p-Stage are significant prognostic predictors of NSCLC, as determined by Cox multivariate analysis.

Human Wip1 protein has a molecular weight of ~61 kD and is composed of 605 amino acids (6). Wip1 has been identified in colon cells expressing a mutant form of p53, and mediates a negative feedback regulation on p53 through the p38MAPK/p53 signaling pathway, leading to decreased expression of p53 and p53 mutants, suggesting a close association between Wip1 and p53 (18). A number of previous reports also identified Wip1 overexpression in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and in accelerated cancer progression (19–21). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to quantify Wip1 expression in different types of lung cancer and normal lung tissue using immunohistochemistry. It was observed that Wip1 protein levels were significantly higher in lung cancer tissue compared with normal tissue, and Wip1 overexpression was observed predominantly in lung adenocarcinoma. The current results are consistent with a previous finding that Wip1 mRNA expression is significantly higher in the early stages of NSCLC (22) and with the observation of increased Wip1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma (15). Using univariate analysis, Zhao et al identified that Wip1 mRNA levels were correlated with the p-Stage of NSCLC (22). The present study also revealed that Wip1 protein levels were correlated with p-Stage and pT classification: Overexpression was predominantly observed in p-Stage III–IV (versus p-Stage I–II) and pT2–4 tumors (versus pT1 tumors). However, no statistically significant correlations were found in NSCLCs between Wip1 expression, and other demographic and pathological factors, such as age, gender, histological differentiation and pN classification.

An underlying hypothesis of the modern era of cancer research has been that prediction of a patient's prognosis or response to therapy may be improved by combining standard clinical variables (i.e., tumor size, differentiation or stage) with intrinsic genetic or biochemical characteristics of the tumors (23). Overexpression of Wip1 in lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, endometrial cancer and gliomas is has previously been identified as a prognostic indicator for certain patients at a high risk of tumor-related mortality (13,15,24,25). Over the past several decades, hundreds of papers have proposed a variety of molecular markers or proteins that may have prognostic significance in NSCLC; for example, p53 (26). Satoh et al reported that there was a statistically significant association between increased Wip1 expression and lower OS rate (15). In the current study, survival analysis identified that the OS rate for patients with NSCLC in the Wip1-positive expression group was significantly lower than that of the Wip1-negative group. Furthermore, Cox multivariate analysis revealed that positive Wip1 expression, as well as the two clinical variables pN classification and p-Stage, were significant prognostic predictors of NSCLC.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Wip1 is overexpressed in NSCLC and that Wip1 overexpression is significantly associated with poorer OS in NSCLC. Therefore, Wip1 status appears to be an independent molecular marker associated with worse clinical outcomes and prognosis of NSCLC. However, the mechanism responsible for the role of Wip1 in tumorigenesis and its biological function merits further evaluation.

 Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (no. H2013315011).

 References SpiraAEttingerDSMultidisciplinary management of lung cancerN Engl J Med350379392200410.1056/NEJMra03553614736930 GovindanRPageNMorgenszternDReadWTierneyRVlahiotisASpitznagelELPiccirilloJChanging epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: Analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results databaseJ Clin Oncol2445394544200610.1200/JCO.2005.04.485917008692 JemalASiegelRWardEMurrayTXuJSmigalCThunMJCancer statistics, 2006CA Cancer J Clin56106130200610.3322/canjclin.56.2.10616514137 SunSSchillerJHSpinolaMMinnaJDNew molecularly targeted therapies for lung cancerJ Clin Invest11727402750200710.1172/JCI3180917909619 CiancioNGalassoMGCampisiRBivonaLMiglioreMDi MariaGUPrognostic value of p53 and Ki67 expression in fiberoptic bronchial biopsies of patients with non small cell lung cancerMultidiscip Respir Med729201210.1186/2049-6958-7-2922978804 MoorheadGBTrinkle-MulcahyLUlke-LeméeAEmerging roles of nuclear protein phosphatasesNat Rev Mol Cell Biol8234244200710.1038/nrm212617318227 FiscellaKFranksPShieldsCGPerceived family criticism and primary care utilization: Psychosocial and biomedical pathwaysFam Process362541199710.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00025.x9189751 LuXNguyenTAMoonSHDarlingtonYSommerMDonehowerLAThe type 2C phosphatase Wip1: An oncogenic regulator of tumor suppressor and DNA damage response pathwaysCancer Metastasis Rev27123135200810.1007/s10555-008-9127-x18265945 GorgoulisVGVassiliouLVKarakaidosPZacharatosPKotsinasALiloglouTVenereMDitullioRAJrKastrinakisNGLevyBActivation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesionsNature434907913200510.1038/nature0348515829965 CastellinoRCDe BortoliMLuXMoonSHNguyenTAShepardMARaoPHDonehowerLAKimJYMedulloblastomas overexpress the p53-inactivating oncogene WIP1/PPM1DJ Neurooncol86245256200810.1007/s11060-007-9470-817932621 Saito-OharaFImotoIInoueJHosoiHNakagawaraASugimotoTInazawaJPPM1D is a potential target for 17q gain in neuroblastomaCancer Res6318761883200312702577 HirasawaASaito-OharaFInoueJAokiDSusumuNYokoyamaTNozawaSInazawaJImotoIAssociation of 17q21-q24 gain in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas with poor prognosis and identification of PPM1D and APPBP2 as likely amplification targetsClin Cancer Res919952004200312796361 HuWFengZModicaIKlimstraDSSongLAllenPJBrennanMFLevineAJTangLHGene amplifications in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors inactivate the p53 pathwayGenes Cancer1360368201010.1177/194760191037197920871795 LiJYangYPengYAustinRJvan EyndhovenWGNguyenKCGabrieleTMcCurrachMEMarksJRHoeyTOncogenic properties of PPM1D located within a breast cancer amplification epicenter at 17q23Nat Genet31133134200210.1038/ng88812021784 SatohNManiwaYBermudezVPNishimuraKNishioWYoshimuraMOkitaYOhbayashiCHurwitzJHayashiYOncogenic phosphatase Wip1 is a novel prognostic marker for lung adenocarcinoma patient survivalCancer Sci10211011106201110.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01898.x21281403 TravisWDBrambillaEMüller-HermelinkHKHarrisCCTumours of the lung. World Health Organization Classification of TumoursPathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and HeartIARC PressLyon102004 GoldstrawPCrowleyJChanskyKGirouxDJGroomePARami-PortaRPostmusPERuschVSobinLInternational Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Committee; Participating Institutions: The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumoursJ Thorac Oncol2706714200710.1097/JTO.0b013e31812f3c1a17762336 ParkJYSongJYKimHMHanHSSeolHSJangSJChoiJp53-Independent expression of wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) in methylmethane sulfonate-treated cancer cell lines and human tumorsInt J Biochem Cell Biol44896904201210.1016/j.biocel.2012.02.01322405851 BulavinDVDemidovONSaitoSKauraniemiPPhillipsCAmundsonSAAmbrosinoCSauterGNebredaARAndersonCWAmplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activityNat Genet31210215200210.1038/ng89412021785 NannengaBLuXDumbleMVan MaanenMNguyenTASuttonRKumarTRDonehowerLAAugmented cancer resistance and DNA damage response phenotypes in PPM1D null miceMol Carcinog45594604200610.1002/mc.2019516652371 DemidovONKekCShreeramSTimofeevOFornaceAJAppellaEBulavinDVThe role of the MKK6/p38 MAPK pathway in Wip1-dependent regulation of ErbB2-driven mammary gland tumorigenesisOncogene2625022506200710.1038/sj.onc.121003217016428 ZhaoJXZWSunLLuoHHGuYExpression of Wip1 in non small cell lung cancer tissue and cellsChin J Pathophysiol25173117352009(In Chinese) SinghalSVachaniAAntin-OzerkisDKaiserLRAlbeldaSMPrognostic implications of cell cycle, apoptosis, and angiogenesis biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer: A reviewClin Cancer Res1139743986200510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-266115930332 HirasawaAAokiDInoueJImotoISusumuNSuganoKNozawaSInazawaJUnfavorable prognostic factors associated with high frequency of microsatellite instability and comparative genomic hybridization analysis in endometrial cancerClin Cancer Res956755682200314654551 LiangCGuoELuSWangSKangCChangLLiuLZhangGWuZZhaoZOver-expression of wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 confers poor prognosis of patients with gliomasBrain Res14446575201210.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.05222325093 CamplingBGEl-DeiryWSClinical implication of p53 mutation in lung cancerMol Biotechnol24141156200310.1385/MB:24:2:14112746555

Wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) expression in normal lung and non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues using immunohistochemistry. (A) No Wip1 expression in normal lung tissue. (B) Weak (+1), (C) moderate (+2) and (D) strong (+3) Wip1 expression in NSCLC tissues. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine and hematoxylin staining; magnification, x100.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for Wip1 expression. Patients with positive Wip1 expression displayed a significantly worse outcome compared with negative Wip1 expression patients (P=0.014, log-rank test). Cum, cumulative; Wip1, wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1; censored, where the patients' survival time is unknown. The survival time is known to be longer than the observed censored time, as the survival includes discontinued follow-up and mortality by other causes. The number of Wip-positive censored patients is 10 and Wip-negative censored patients is 4.

Association between Wip1 immunostaining scores and NSCLC histological subtype.

Wip1 immunostaining score, n (%)
NSCLC subtype 0 1 2 3 Total
Adenocarcinoma 3 (5.7) 3 (5.6) 44 (83.0) 3 (5.7) 53 (88.7)
Squamous cell carcinoma 5 (11.4) 14 (31.8) 23 (52.3) 2 (4.5) 44 (37.6)
Othersa 4 (2.0) 9 (45.0) 6 (30.0) 1 (5.0) 20 (17.2)
Total 12 (10.2) 24 (20.5) 75 (64.1) 6 (5.2) 117 (100)

Other subtypes included 9 adenosquamous carcinoma, 6 large cell carcinoma and 5 sarcomatoid carcinoma cases. Wip1, wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma. The expression of Wip1 in control tissues was 0 (no staining; not shown).

Association between Wip1 expression, and demographic and pathological tumor characteristics of patients with NSCLC.

Wip1 protein status, na
Clinical parameter + − P-valueb
Age, years 57.8±11.5c 56.1±9.1c 0.268
Gender 0.138
  Male 57 30
  Female 24   6
Histology <0.001
  Adenocarcinoma 49   4
  Squamous cell carcinoma 25 19
  Others   7 13
Differentiation 0.249
  Well 24   7
  Moderate/poor 57 29
pT classification 0.004
  T1 12 14
  T2–4 69 22
pN classification   0.157
  N0 45 25
  N1–3 36 11
p-Stage 0.045
  I–II 55 11
  III–IV 26 15

Wip1(+) group (n=81) is defined as cases with moderate and strong expression (immunostaining score, 2/3); Wip1(−) group (n=36) is defined as cases with weak expression (immunostaining score, 0/1). Data were presented as mean±standard deviation.

Pearson χ2 test was used to derive P-values, excluding age, which was analyzed by Student's t-test.

Data are presented as mean ± range. Wip1, wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Cox proportional hazard model analysis of survival time.

95% CI for Exp (B)
Wald Exp (B) Lower Upper P-value
Wip1 (+ vs. -)a 6.815 5.096 1.501 17.303 0.009
p-Stage (I–II vs. III–IV) 6.150 0.159 0.037 0.680 0.013
pT classification (T1 vs. T2–4) 1.502 4.712 0.395 26.210 0.220
pN classification (N0 vs. N1–3) 5.218 5.488 1.273 23.647 0.022
Histology (adenocarcinoma vs. non-adenocarcinomab) 0.006 1.564 0.561 9.377 0.937
Differentiation (well vs. moderate/poor) 1.688 0.306 0.051 1.825 0.194
Gender (male vs. female) 1.185 4.439 0.303 5.005 0.276
Age 0.143 0.991 0.948 1.037 0.705

Wip1(+) is defined as cases with moderate and strong expression (immunostaining score, 2/3); Wip1(−) is defined as cases with weak expression (immunostaining score, 0/1).

Non-adenocarcinoma includes squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, large cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid carcinoma. CI, confidence interval; Wip1, wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1.