<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OL</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oncology Letters</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-1074</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1082</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2017.5720</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OL-0-0-5720</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The nutritional herb <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic> inhibits the growth in a model for the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>Nitin T.</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="c1-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Gou</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Katdare</surname><given-names>Meena</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af3-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">3</xref>
<xref rid="af4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sepkovic</surname><given-names>Daniel W.</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af5-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">5</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>H. Leon</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af5-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">5</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>George Y.C.</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="af6-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="aff">6</xref></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ol-0-0-5720"><label>1</label>Cancer Prevention Research Program, Palindrome Liaisons Consultants, Montvale, NJ 07645-1559, USA</aff>
<aff id="af2-ol-0-0-5720"><label>2</label>American Foundation for Chinese Medicine, Inc., Long Island, NY 11103-0905, USA</aff>
<aff id="af3-ol-0-0-5720"><label>3</label>Skin of Color Research Institute, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668, USA</aff>
<aff id="af4-ol-0-0-5720"><label>4</label>Department of Dermatology and Leroy T. Canoles Jr. Cancer Research Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA 23507, USA</aff>
<aff id="af5-ol-0-0-5720"><label>5</label>Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA</aff>
<aff id="af6-ol-0-0-5720"><label>6</label>Breast Center, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ol-0-0-5720"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Dr Nitin T. Telang, Cancer Prevention Research Program, Palindrome Liaisons Consultants, Suite B, 10 Rolling Ridge Road, Montvale, NJ 07645-1559, USA, E-mail: <email>entitytoo@gmail.com</email>; <email>ntelang3@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>04</month>
<year>2017</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2017</year></pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>2477</fpage>
<lpage>2482</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>12</month><year>2016</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2017, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The Luminal A subtype of breast cancer expresses the estrogen receptor (ER)-&#x03B1; and progesterone receptor (PR), but not the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 oncogene. This subtype of breast cancer responds to endocrine therapy involving the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators and/or inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis. However, these therapeutic agents are frequently associated with long-term systemic toxicity and acquired tumor resistance, emphasizing the need to identify non-toxic alternative treatments for chemo-endocrine therapy responsive breast cancer. The present study utilized the human mammary carcinoma-derived, ER<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/PR<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/HER-2<sup>&#x2212;</sup> MCF-7 cell line as a model of the Luminal A subtype of breast cancer to examine the growth inhibitory effect of the Chinese nutritional herb <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic> (EG) and determine the mechanisms underlying this effect. MCF-7 cells maintained in a serum-depleted culture medium retained their ability to grow in response to 17&#x03B2;-estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>). Treatment of the MCF-7 cells with EG resulted in dose-dependent inhibition of E<sub>2</sub>-promoted growth. Mechanistically, EG inhibited E<sub>2</sub>-promoted cell cycle progression through G<sub>1</sub> stage arrest and modulated the cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub>, increasing the formation of the anti-proliferative metabolites 2-hydroxyestrone and estriol. Long-term treatment of MCF-7 cells with EG inhibited E<sub>2</sub>-promoted anchorage independent growth, a surrogate <italic>in vitro</italic> biomarker of tumorigenesis. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrate the growth inhibitory effects of EG on MCF-7 cells and identified clinically relevant mechanistic leads for its anti-tumorigenic efficacy.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>nutritional herb</kwd>
<kwd>prevention</kwd>
<kwd>breast cancer</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Metastatic breast cancer is one of the leading causes of breast-cancer associated mortality in the United States, and the American Cancer Society (Atlanta, GA, USA) projections for breast cancer incidence and mortality rates estimate 246,660 newly diagnosed cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,450 metastatic breast cancer-associated mortalities in women in 2017 (<xref rid="b1-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). These figures emphasize the requirement for a more precise molecular classification of breast cancer for subtype-specific targeted therapy, in addition to the necessity to identify novel, non-toxic and efficacious modalities as alternatives for cancer prevention and therapy.</p>
<p>The global gene expression profiling of breast cancer has led to the identification of molecularly distinct subtypes. Patients with the molecular subtype Luminal A express estrogen receptor-&#x03B1; (ER)-&#x03B1; and progesterone receptor (PR), and they lack the expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). Patients with this subtype respond to endocrine-based targeted therapy, such as selective ER modulators and specific small molecule inhibitors of estrogen biosynthesis (<xref rid="b2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). However, long-term endocrine-based therapy has been associated with adverse systemic toxicity, acquired tumor resistance and the emergence of drug resistant cancer stem cells that compromise therapeutic efficacy and promote disease progression (<xref rid="b4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Complementary and alternative medicine using herbal products has been applied to endocrine therapy-responsive patients with breast cancer, as a potential method of reducing therapy-associated toxicity. Several nutritional herbs, including <italic>Lycium barbarum</italic> (LB), <italic>Cornus offcinalis</italic> (CO) and <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic> (EG), are essential components of herbal formulations that are used in traditional Chinese medicine as palliative and/or adjuvant treatment options for women with breast cancer (<xref rid="b7-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b8-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). The majority of nutritional herbs display potent immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic properties <italic>in vivo</italic> (<xref rid="b7-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). However, the underlying molecular signaling pathways and targets that are responsible for the growth inhibitory effects of these herbs on breast cancer cells remain to be systematically elucidated.</p>
<p>The human mammary carcinoma-derived cell line MCF-7 expresses ER-&#x03B1; and PR, and lacks HER-2 expression, thus representing an accepted pre-clinical cell model for the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer (<xref rid="b2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). Previous studies using MCF-7 cells as a model for the Luminal A breast cancer subtype have demonstrated the direct growth inhibitory efficacy of extracts from Chinese nutritional herbs, such as LB and CO, that function through distinct mechanistic pathways (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). The present study utilized MCF-7 cells to investigate the direct growth inhibitory effects of the Chinese nutritional herb EG and identify the potential molecular mechanisms underlying its efficacy.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture</title>
<p>The ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/PR<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/HER-2<sup>&#x2212;</sup> human mammary carcinoma-derived cell line MCF-7 was obtained from the Michigan Cancer Foundation (Detroit, MI, USA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco&#x0027;s modified Eagle&#x0027;s medium: Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) supplemented with heat inactivated 7&#x0025; fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1&#x0025; penicillin-streptomycin mixture (all Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 10 &#x00B5;g/ml insulin (Ely Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and 1 &#x00B5;M dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), following published protocols (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, MCF-7 cells were adapted for long-term growth in serum-depleted medium through maintaining the cells in DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 0.7&#x0025; fetal calf serum [17&#x03B2;-estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) &#x003C;1 nM] for &#x2265;5 passages. Stock cultures were routinely maintained in DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 0.7&#x0025; fetal calf serum in a humidified atmosphere with 5&#x0025; CO<sub>2</sub> at 37&#x00B0;C. Cells were sub-cultured in a 1:4 ratio once they reached 80&#x0025; confluency.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Growth parameters</title>
<p>Cell population doubling time was determined during the exponential growth phase. Viable cell counts were performed 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-seeding of 1&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup> cells using a trypan blue exclusion cell viability assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore), following the protocol supplied by the vendor. The data are expressed as the mean of the four time points. Similarly, saturation density was determined by the viable cell count on day 7 post-seeding, using the trypan blue cell viability assay kit. The experiment for anchorage independent (AI) growth was performed using 12-wells/treatment group. AI growth was evaluated by determining the number of AI colonies that had developed in 0.33&#x0025; Bacto-agar (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore) on day 21 post-seeding of 1&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup> cells, following published optimized protocols (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Aqueous extract of EG</title>
<p>To prepare an aqueous extract, 20 g of leaves and stems from EG were boiled in 200 ml of deionized water until the volume had reduced to 100 ml, and the supernatant was subsequently collected (extract 1). The resultant residue was further boiled in 100 ml of water until the volume had reduced to 50 ml (extract 2). The two extracts (100 and 50 ml) were combined and further concentrated through boiling until the volume had reduced to 25 ml. These combined extracts were centrifuged at 500 &#x00D7; g at room temperature for 10 min. The resulting supernatant (20 ml) was collected and stored in 5 ml aliquots at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. The stock solution (100&#x0025;) was serially diluted in DMEM/F-12 to obtain working solutions of 2.0, 1.0 and 0.5&#x0025; for subsequent experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Dose-response analysis</title>
<p>To determine the growth inhibitory effects, and the minimum effective and maximum cytostatic concentrations of EG, the MCF-7 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of EG (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0&#x0025;). The experiments for the dose-response of EG were performed using 6 flasks/treatment group. Viable cell counts were determined on day 7 post-seeding of 1.0&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup> cells using the trypan blue exclusion cell viability assay as described above. Dose-response analysis identified the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC<sub>50</sub>), the maximum cytostatic concentration (IC<sub>90</sub>) and the toxic concentration of EG for growth inhibition. The IC<sub>90</sub> was defined as the highest dose of EG that resulted in a viable cell count &#x2265; the initial seeding density. The toxic concentration was defined as the lowest dose of EG that resulted in a viable cell count &#x003C; the initial seeding density.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell cycle progression</title>
<p>To examine the effect of EG on cell cycle progression, MCF-7 cell cultures treated for 48 h with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore) alone (control) or with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;1.0&#x0025; EG were analyzed using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, following an optimized protocol (<xref rid="b12-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). Briefly, trypsinized cell cultures from the control and treatment groups were stained with propidium iodide (Calbiochem; Merck Millipore), and the percentage of the cell population in G<sub>1</sub>, S and G<sub>2</sub>/M phases of the cell cycle was monitored using the EPICS<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 752 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA), equipped with a 488 nM excitation filter and a 630 nM longpass filter. Cell cycle phase distribution was analyzed using MultiCycle MPLUS 2.0 software (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA, USA). Results are expressed as the percentage of cells in G<sub>1</sub>, S and G<sub>2</sub>/M phases of the cell cycle. In addition, the G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio of the number of cells in each phase is presented. This assay was performed using 3 flasks/treatment group.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>To examine the effect of EG on the cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub>, on day 1 post-seeding, 1&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup> MCF-7 cells were treated with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> alone (control) or E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;1.0&#x0025; EG for 48 h. The media was subsequently collected and analyzed for the presence of select E<sub>2</sub> metabolites, such as estrone (E<sub>1</sub>), 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE<sub>1</sub>), 16&#x03B1;-hydroxyestrone (16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub>) and estriol (E<sub>3</sub>), using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. An Agilent 6908 N gas chromatograph equipped with an Agilent 5973 mass selection detector, Agilent 7683 injector and HPGI 701 CA MSD Chemstation (all Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used following a previously optimized protocol (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). Primary data are expressed as metabolite concentration (ng)/1&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup> cells. Additionally, the primary data was analyzed and expressed as 2-OHE<sub>1</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> and E<sub>3</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> ratios for E<sub>2</sub> metabolites. This assay was performed using 3 flasks/treatment group.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed using the Student&#x0027;s t-test and one-way analysis of variance, followed by a Dunnett&#x0027;s Multiple Range Test (&#x03B1;=0.05) where appropriate. All tests were performed using GraphPad Prism<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> software (version 5.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P&#x003C;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The threshold of &#x03B1;=0.05 was selected for comparison of multiple treatment groups using the Dunnett&#x0027;s Multiple Range Test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Growth-promoting effects of E<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>Results of the investigation into the effects of E<sub>2</sub> on MCF-7 cells adapted for growth in 0.7&#x0025; serum (E<sub>2</sub>, &#x003C;1 nM) vs. those in 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> are presented in <xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>. MCF-7 cells treated with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> demonstrated a 17.6&#x0025; decrease in the population doubling time, a 91.9&#x0025; increase in the saturation density and a 1.2-fold increase in the number of AI colonies compared with the control group that had been grown in 0.7&#x0025; serum (E<sub>2</sub>, &#x003C;1 nM). The statistical significance of the data was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett&#x0027;s Multiple Range Test (&#x03B1;=0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Dose-response to EG</title>
<p>Results of the investigation into the growth inhibitory effects of EG on MCF-7 cells are presented in <xref rid="f1-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>. A 7-day treatment with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> resulted in a viable cell count of 26.1&#x00B1;4.7&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup>, a 26-fold increase compared with the initial seeding density (&#x03B1;=0.05). Furthermore, treatment with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;0.5&#x0025; EG and 20 nM E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;1.0&#x0025; EG resulted in a significant decrease in the viable cell counts compared with the 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group (20 nM E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;0.5&#x0025; EG, 12.8&#x00B1;2.3&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup>; 52.6&#x0025; decrease; &#x03B1;=0.05) and (20 nM E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;1.0&#x0025; EG, 2.4&#x00B1;0.4&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup>; 87.0&#x0025; decrease; &#x03B1;=0.05). This dose-response analysis identified that EG had an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.49&#x00B1;0.18&#x0025; and an IC<sub>90</sub> of 1.03&#x00B1;0.17&#x0025; (data not shown). An EG concentration of 2.0&#x0025; was toxic to MCF-7 cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of EG on cell cycle progression</title>
<p>Data from the investigation into the effect of E<sub>2</sub> and E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG on the cell cycle progression of MCF-7 cells are presented in <xref rid="tII-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>. The data demonstrates that treatment with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> induced an increase in the percentage of cells in the S and G<sub>2</sub>/M phases, with a simultaneous decrease in the percentage of cells in the G<sub>1</sub> phase, compared with the serum-treated control group. Furthermore, treatment with 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> and the IC<sub>90</sub> concentration of EG (1.0&#x0025;) induced pronounced G<sub>1</sub> cell cycle arrest with a simultaneous decrease in the percentage of cells in the S and G<sub>2</sub>/M phases, compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control. Compared with the serum-treated control group, treatment with E<sub>2</sub> resulted in a 54.3&#x0025; decrease (&#x03B1;=0.05) in the G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio of cells. In addition, treatment with EG&#x002B;E<sub>2</sub> resulted in a 76.2&#x0025; increase in the G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio of cells compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group (&#x03B1;=0.05). These results indicate that E<sub>2</sub> accelerates cell cycle progression and that EG can attenuate the effect of E<sub>2</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of EG on the cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>Data from the investigation into the effect of EG on E<sub>2</sub> metabolism are presented in <xref rid="tIII-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>. The results demonstrate that the E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG group had a significantly increased formation rate of E<sub>1</sub> (P=0.01), 2-OHE<sub>1</sub> (P=0.006) and E<sub>3</sub> (P=0.001) compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group. EG induced a 3.3-fold increase in E<sub>1</sub> formation, a 5.0-fold increase in 2-OHE<sub>1</sub> formation and a 9.0-fold increase in E<sub>3</sub> formation compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group. Additionally, the primary data were further analyzed and expressed as the 2-OHE<sub>1</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> and E<sub>3</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> ratios. This analysis revealed that the 2-OHE<sub>1</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> ratio was 0.39&#x00B1;0.16 for the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group and 1.9&#x00B1;0.4 for the E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG-treated group, demonstrating a significant 3.9-fold increase (P=0.01) compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group. Similarly, the E<sub>3</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> ratio was 0.16&#x00B1;0.06 for the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control and 0.58&#x00B1;0.14 for the E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG-treated group, demonstrating a significant 2.6-fold increase (P=0.03) compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control group.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of EG on AI cell growth</title>
<p>Results from the investigation into the effect of EG on AI growth are presented in <xref rid="f2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>. The AI colony count in the serum-treated control group was 16.8&#x00B1;1.8 compared with 36.9&#x00B1;2.1 in the E<sub>2</sub>-treated group, illustrating a 119.6&#x0025; increase compared with the control group (&#x03B1;=0.05). The AI colony count in the 0.5&#x0025; EG and 1.0&#x0025; EG-treated groups was 18.1&#x00B1;1.0 and 4.7&#x00B1;0.4, respectively, compared with the E<sub>2</sub> alone-treated control (&#x03B1;=0.05). Thus, treatment with E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;0.5&#x0025; EG and E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;1.0&#x0025; EG resulted in a substantial 50.9 and 87.3&#x0025; decrease in the AI colony count, respectively, compared with the E<sub>2</sub>-treated control.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The Luminal A molecular subtype of clinical breast cancer, defined by the expression of ER-&#x03B1; and PR, is typically treated with selective ER modulators and/or aromatase inhibitors, with or without cytotoxic drugs (<xref rid="b3-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). These treatments are frequently associated with systemic toxicity and acquired tumor resistance, compromising therapeutic efficacy. Relatively non-toxic nutritional herbal products are used as therapeutic alternatives in traditional Chinese medicine. However, the long-term clinical safety, efficacy and potential interaction of nutritional herbs with traditional therapies remain unclear. The present study utilized the human mammary carcinoma-derived MCF-7 cell line (ER<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/PR<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/HER-2<sup>&#x2212;</sup>) as a preclinical cell model of the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer, in order to investigate the growth inhibitory effects of the nutritional herb EG and to identify possible molecular mechanisms for its efficacy.</p>
<p>MCF-7 cells that were maintained in a medium supplemented with 0.7&#x0025; serum (E<sub>2</sub>, &#x003C;1 nM) retained their responsiveness to physiologically relevant concentrations of E<sub>2</sub>. This response was demonstrated by an increase in the number of viable cells following treatment with 20 nM of E<sub>2</sub> compared with the serum-treated control group. In addition, at this physiological concentration E<sub>2</sub> decreased cell population doubling time, increased saturation density and enhanced AI growth compared with the corresponding control groups. These data are consistent with a recent study, where E<sub>2</sub> concentrations within the physiological range induced progressive increases in viable cell number (<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). These results indicate that the method used in the current study produced an optimized E<sub>2</sub>-responsive cell culture model for the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer.</p>
<p>Dose-response analysis demonstrated that E<sub>2</sub>-promoted cell growth was inhibited by EG in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.49&#x0025; and IC<sub>90</sub> of 1.03&#x0025;. EG at a concentration of 2.0&#x0025; demonstrated a cytotoxic response, indicated by a significantly reduced viable cell count, relative to the initial seeding density. These data indicate that EG antagonizes the growth-promoting effect of E<sub>2</sub>.</p>
<p>The growth-promoting effect of E<sub>2</sub> on MCF-7 cells was demonstrated when investigating the effect of E<sub>2</sub> on cell cycle progression. These was a reduction in the G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio of cells in the E<sub>2</sub>-treated group compared with the serum-treated control group. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with E<sub>2</sub> resulted in a decreased percentage of cells in the G<sub>1</sub> phase, with a simultaneous increase in the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle. At its IC<sub>90</sub> concentration, EG inhibited the E<sub>2</sub>-induced cell cycle progression of MCF-7 cells, as demonstrated by a pronounced G<sub>1</sub> stage arrest and simultaneous decrease in the number of cells in the S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M phases of the cell cycle. This alteration in cell cycle progression was associated with an increase in the G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio and suggests that the cytostatic effect of EG is predominantly due to the inhibition of E<sub>2</sub>-promoted cell cycle progression.</p>
<p>Data from the present study on the cytostatic effect of EG at a relatively low dose are consistent with previous studies investigating the effects of extracts from other nutritional herbs, such as <italic>Tabebuia avellandae (TA)</italic>, <italic>CO</italic> and <italic>LB</italic>, on MCF-7 cells (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). The signaling pathways susceptible to extracts from TA, CO and LB include cell proliferation, cellular apoptosis, ER, xenobiotic metabolism and cell cycle progression through the modulated expression of specific genes (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). Additionally, these extracts affect the cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub>, as demonstrated through the increased formation of specific anti-proliferative metabolites of E<sub>2</sub> (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b13-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). These results suggest that low-dose treatment with extracts from nutritional herbs is associated with an acceptable toxicity profile for future animal experiments and clinical trials.</p>
<p>The organ-selective growth-promoting effects of E<sub>2</sub> have been well established in cell culture and <italic>in vivo</italic> in animal models. Previously, E<sub>2</sub> has been demonstrated to promote the growth of ER-positive MCF-7 cells <italic>in vitro</italic>, and promote tumor development <italic>in vivo</italic> (<xref rid="b15-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). In addition to the effects of E<sub>2</sub> on ER-dependent cellular signal transduction pathways (<xref rid="b5-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>), specific cellular metabolites of E<sub>2</sub> have been demonstrated to modulate the growth of mammary carcinoma-derived cells (<xref rid="b16-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). The intermediate metabolite E<sub>1</sub> functions as a common precursor for the formation of the pro-mitogenic 16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> through the C16&#x03B1;-hydroxylation pathway, or for the formation of anti-proliferative 2-OHE<sub>1</sub> through the C2-hydroxylation pathway (<xref rid="b16-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b21-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). The results of the present study demonstrated that treatment with EG significantly increased the formation of E<sub>1</sub>, 2-OHE<sub>1</sub> and E<sub>3</sub>, while the formation of 16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> remained essentially unaltered, when compared with the E<sub>2</sub>-treated control group. Since the C2- and C16&#x03B1;-hydroxylation pathways represent two divergent metabolic pathways generating distinct E<sub>2</sub> metabolites, and since E<sub>3</sub> represents a proximate metabolite of 16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub>, the relative ratios of these metabolites serve as important endocrine biomarkers for carcinogenic risk (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). In the present study, E<sub>2</sub> metabolite ratios demonstrated that in response to the treatment with EG, the 2-OHE<sub>1</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> and the E<sub>3</sub>:16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> ratios were substantially increased compared with the E<sub>2</sub>-treated control group. This indicates that EG selectively induces increased formation of 2-OHE<sub>1</sub> and accelerates conversion of 16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub> into E<sub>3</sub>. Notably, similar modulation of the cellular metabolism of E<sub>2</sub> by extracts from CO and LB has been revealed (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>).</p>
<p>AI growth represents a specific and sensitive <italic>in vitro</italic> surrogate end-point biomarker for tumorigenic phenotypes (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b20-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b22-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>). In the current study, E<sub>2</sub> promoted the formation of AI colonies by MCF-7 cells. In response to treatment with EG, the number of AI colonies decreased in a dose-dependent manner, supporting the potential of EG as an anti-tumorigenic agent.</p>
<p>The results of the present study provide mechanistic evidence for the growth inhibitory effect of EG in a cellular model of ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/PR<sup>&#x002B;</sup>/HER-2<sup>&#x2212;</sup> Luminal A subtype breast cancer. A recent study compared the efficacy of several Chinese nutritional herbs on ER non-functional (ER-NF) and ER functional (ER-F) phenotypes of breast cancer (<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>), where EG demonstrated comparable growth inhibition in ER-NF and ER-F phenotypes, suggesting potential efficacy in ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x2212;</sup> and ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x002B;</sup> breast cancer. In addition, an ongoing study into the growth inhibitory effects of EG in a ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x2212;</sup>/PR<sup>&#x2212;</sup>/HER-2<sup>&#x2212;</sup> triple-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell model has elucidated the potential molecular mechanisms underlying the cell cycle arrest and induction of cellular apoptosis (Telang <italic>et al</italic>, unpublished results). These results suggest that EG is an anti-tumorigenic agent in ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x2212;</sup> and triple-negative breast cancer, in addition to the Luminal A subtype investigated in the present study.</p>
<p>It is well known that traditional herbal medicine combines the use of several herbal preparations and that these herbs contain several bioactive agents. Traditionally, herbs are boiled in water and consumed by patients as herbal tea (<xref rid="b7-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b8-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b23-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b25-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). Therefore, to simulate patient consumption, non-fractionated aqueous extracts from EG were used as the test agent in the present study. Despite the growth inhibitory effects of the non-fractionated aqueous extract of EG demonstrated in the current study, the identity of the water-soluble bioactive agent(s) in this extract remain unclear. Methanolic extracts from EG containing icariin and icaritin have been demonstrated to effect multidrug resistance in HepG2/ADR cells (<xref rid="b26-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). In contrast, the same methanol soluble bioactive agents induce growth promoting effects through the upregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in a model of HER-2<sup>&#x002B;</sup> breast cancer (<xref rid="b27-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). Furthermore, organic solvent fractionated extracts from <italic>Epimedium brevicornum</italic> containing the prenylflavone breviflavone B have been demonstrated to exhibit inhibitory effects on ER-&#x03B1; expression, in addition to on the growth of ER-&#x03B1;<sup>&#x002B;</sup> breast cancer cells <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> (<xref rid="b28-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b30-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). The growth inhibitory effect of non-fractionated aqueous extract from EG in the present study and the growth modulatory effects of organic solvent fractionated extracts from different <italic>Epimedium</italic> species in previous studies, suggest that EG has a pleiotropic effect, which is likely due to the presence of distinct constitutive bioactive components. In addition to the MCF-7 cell line representing a model of the Luminal A subtype of breast cancer, MCF-7 cells have provided a model for endocrine therapy-resistant cancer stem cells (<xref rid="b31-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). Investigations into the response of cancer stem cell models to EG may identify potential therapeutic targets for stem cell therapy. A study using a similar approach has identified the antitumorigenic efficacy of the phytochemicals quercetin and sulforaphane in pancreatic cancer stem cells (<xref rid="b32-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, the present study has identified distinct phenomenological and mechanistic evidence for the antitumorigenic efficacy of EG in the Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer. The results of the present study validate a mechanism-driven cell culture approach to prioritize efficacious herbal medicinal products for the treatment of patients with the ER<sup>&#x002B;</sup> Luminal A molecular subtype of breast cancer.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The present study was supported by philanthropic contributions to the American Foundation for Chinese Medicine from the Sophie Stenbeck Family Foundation.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ol-0-0-5720"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><collab collab-type="corp-author">American Cancer Society</collab><source>Cancer Facts &#x0026; Figures</source><publisher-name>American Cancer Society</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Atlanta, CA</publisher-loc><year>2015</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ol-0-0-5720"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00F8;rlie</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Perou</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tibshirany</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Aas</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Geisler</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnsen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hastie</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisen</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>van de Rijn</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeffrey</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>98</volume><fpage>10869</fpage><lpage>10874</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.191367098</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11553815</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ol-0-0-5720"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dinh</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Satirou</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Piccart</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The evaluation of treatment strategies: Aiming at the target</article-title><source>Breast</source><volume>16</volume><supplement>Suppl 2</supplement><fpage>S10</fpage><lpage>S16</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.032</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17764940</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ol-0-0-5720"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lippman</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Efforts to combine endocrine and chemotherapy in the management of breast cancer: Do two and two equals three?</article-title><source>Breast Cancer res Treat</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><year>1983</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01803554</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6351947</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ol-0-0-5720"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnston</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Dowsett</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: Lessons from the laboratory</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>821</fpage><lpage>831</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc1211</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14668813</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ol-0-0-5720"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Musgrove</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutherland</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>631</fpage><lpage>643</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc2713</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19701242</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ol-0-0-5720"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rock</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>DeMichelle</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Nutritional approaches to late toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors</article-title><source>J Nutr</source><volume>133</volume><supplement>11 Suppl 1</supplement><fpage>3785S</fpage><lpage>3793S</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14608115</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ol-0-0-5720"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hyler</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name><name><surname>Chin</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Fitzgerald</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Rakovitch</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Dranitsaris</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Clemons</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients with locally advanced breast cancer-a descriptive study</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>39</fpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2407-6-39</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16504038</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ol-0-0-5720"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sepkovic</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Anti-proliferative effects of Chinese herb Cornus officinals in a cell culture model for estrogen receptor-positive clinical breast cancer</article-title><source>Mol Med Rep</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21971582</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ol-0-0-5720"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sepkovic</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparative efficacy of Lycium barbarum bark and fruit on estrogen receptor positive human mammary carcinoma MCF-7 cells</article-title><source>Nutr Cancer</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>278</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01635581.2014.864776</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24377707</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ol-0-0-5720"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitajima</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Alteration in proliferative and endocrine responsiveness of human mammary carcinoma cells by prototype tumor-suppressing agents</article-title><source>Steroids</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>219</lpage><year>1993</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0039-128X(93)90021-E</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ol-0-0-5720"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katdare</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Soy isoflavone genestein modulates cell cycle progression and induces apoptosis in HER-2/Neu oncogene expressing human breast epithelial cells</article-title><source>Int J Oncol</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>809</fpage><lpage>815</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12239620</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ol-0-0-5720"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mukherjee</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Growth inhibition of estrogen receptor positive human breast cancer cells by Taheebo from the inner bark of Tabebuia avellandae tree</article-title><source>Int J Mol Med</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>253</fpage><lpage>260</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19578798</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ol-0-0-5720"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Katdare</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sepkovic</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Inhibitory effects of Chinese nutritonal herbs in isogenic breast carcinoma cells with modulated estrogen receptor function</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>3949</fpage><lpage>3957</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27895755</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ol-0-0-5720"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lippman</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name><name><surname>Knazek</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>In vitro model systems for the study of hormone dependent human breast cancer</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><volume>296</volume><fpage>154</fpage><lpage>159</lpage><year>1977</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJM197701202960307</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">187935</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ol-0-0-5720"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yager</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidson</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><volume>354</volume><fpage>270</fpage><lpage>282</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMra050776</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16421368</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ol-0-0-5720"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fishman</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of estrogens in mammary carcinogenesis</article-title><source>NY Acad Sci</source><volume>768</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><year>1995</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb12113.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ol-0-0-5720"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Huh</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Fishman</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Anti-estrogen action of 2-hydroxyestrone on MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>259</volume><fpage>4840</fpage><lpage>4845</lpage><year>1984</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6325410</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ol-0-0-5720"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lottering</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Haag</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Segers</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of 17beta-estradiol metabolites on cell cycle events in MCF-7 cells</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>52</volume><fpage>5926</fpage><lpage>5932</lpage><year>1992</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1327520</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ol-0-0-5720"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Suto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>GY</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradlow</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Induction by estrogen metabolite 16alpha-hydroxyestrone of genotoxic damage and aberrant proliferation in mouse mammary epithelial cells</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><volume>84</volume><fpage>634</fpage><lpage>638</lpage><year>1992</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jnci/84.8.634</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1556774</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ol-0-0-5720"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>NT</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanino</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeshita</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohmiya</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Osborne</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubota</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>In vitro and in vivo modulation of growth regulation in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 by estradiol metabolites</article-title><source>Breast Cancer</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02966913</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11091698</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ol-0-0-5720"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Katdare</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epithelial cell culture models for the prevention and therapy of clinical breast cancer (Review)</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>744</fpage><lpage>750</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22740986</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ol-0-0-5720"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamilton</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Shoemaker</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tagliaferri</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Tripathi</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Antiproliferative activity of Chinese medicinal herbs on breast cancer cells in vitro</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>3843</fpage><lpage>3852</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12553004</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ol-0-0-5720"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chiu</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Tseng</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>WS</given-names></name><name><surname>Shyr</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Screening to identify commonly used Chinese herbs that affect ERB2 and ESR-1 gene expression using the human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line</article-title><source>Evid Based Complement Alternat Med</source><volume>2014</volume><fpage>965486</fpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2014/965486</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24987437</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ol-0-0-5720"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanders</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>WG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and cancer metastasis</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1240</fpage><lpage>1250</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26622657</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ol-0-0-5720"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Icaritin reverses multi-drug resistance of HepG2/ADR human hepatoma cells via downregulation of MDR1 and P-glycoprotein expression</article-title><source>Mol Med Rep</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1883</fpage><lpage>1887</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24145579</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ol-0-0-5720"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>WS</given-names></name><name><surname>Aisa</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Icariin and Icaritin stimulate the proliferation of SKBr-3 cells through the GPER1-mediated modulation of the EGFR-MAPK signaling pathway</article-title><source>Int J Mol Med</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>1627</fpage><lpage>1634</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24718680</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ol-0-0-5720"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yap</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Loy</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yong</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>New estrogenic prenylflavone from Epimedium brevicornum inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells</article-title><source>Planta Med</source><volume>71</volume><fpage>114</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-2005-837776</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15729618</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ol-0-0-5720"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yap</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>LS</given-names></name><name><surname>Yong</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Molecular and pharmaco-dynamic properties of estrogenic extracts from the traditional Chinese medicinal herb, Epimedium</article-title><source>J Ethno-pharmacol</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>224</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jep.2007.05.029</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ol-0-0-5720"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indran</surname><given-names>IR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Erdelmeier</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Koch</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Yong</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Selective estrogen receptor modulator effects of epimedium extracts on breast cancer and uterine growth in nude mice</article-title><source>Planta Med</source><volume>80</volume><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24310211</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ol-0-0-5720"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Telang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Putative cancer-initiating stem cells in cell culture models for molecular subtypes of clinical breast cancer</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>3840</fpage><lpage>3846</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26788219</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ol-0-0-5720"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Kallifatidis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Baumann</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Rausch</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Mattern</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gladkich</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Giese</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Moldenhauer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wirth</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>B&#x00FC;chler</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Dietary polyphenol quercetin targets pancreatic cancer stem cells</article-title><source>Int J Oncol</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>551</fpage><lpage>561</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20664924</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ol-0-0-5720" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Dose-response analysis of EG in MCF-7 cells. The growth promoting effect of E<sub>2</sub>, represented by viable cell number, decreased in response to treatment with EG in a dose-dependent manner. EG IC<sub>50</sub>, 0.49&#x00B1;0.18&#x0025;; IC<sub>90</sub>, 1.03&#x00B1;0.17&#x0025;. Results are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=6/treatment group). E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM &#x002B; EG 0.5&#x0025; (E<sub>2</sub>&#x003E;E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG, &#x03B1;=0.05), E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM &#x002B; EG 1.0&#x0025; (E<sub>2</sub>&#x003E;E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG, &#x03B1;=0.05), and E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM &#x002B; EG 2.0&#x0025; (E<sub>2</sub>&#x003E;E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG, &#x03B1;=0.05). Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett&#x0027;s test (&#x03B1;=0.05). E<sub>2</sub>, 17&#x03B2;-estradiol; EG, <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-13-04-2477-g00.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-ol-0-0-5720" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p>Effect of EG on the AI growth of MCF-7 cells. Results are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=12/treatment group). E<sub>2</sub> promoted AI growth of the cells, represented by the number of AI colonies, decreased in response to treatment with EG in a dose-dependent manner. Serum vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM (serum&#x003C;E<sub>2</sub> &#x03B1;=0.05), E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM &#x002B; EG 0.5&#x0025; (E<sub>2</sub>&#x003E;E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG &#x03B1;=0.05), E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM vs. E<sub>2</sub> 20 nM &#x002B; EG 1.0&#x0025; (E<sub>2</sub>&#x003E;E<sub>2</sub>&#x002B;EG &#x03B1;=0.05). Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett&#x0027;s test (&#x03B1;=0.05). E<sub>2</sub>, 17&#x03B2;-estradiol, EG, <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic>; AI, anchorage independent.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-13-04-2477-g01.jpg"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ol-0-0-5720" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption><p>Growth promoting effects of E<sub>2</sub> on MCF-7 cells.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Culture conditions</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Growth parameter</th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">0.7&#x0025; serum (&#x003C;1 nM E<sub>2</sub>)</th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">0.7&#x0025; serum &#x002B; 20 nM E<sub>2</sub></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Population doubling (h)<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33.0&#x00B1;1.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27.2&#x00B1;1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Saturation density (x10<sup>5</sup>)<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.6&#x00B1;4.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26.1&#x00B1;4.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">AI colonies (no.)<sup><xref rid="tfn3-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16.5&#x00B1;1.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37.2&#x00B1;2.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-ol-0-0-5720"><label>a</label><p>Determined from the exponential growth phase (n=3/treatment group).</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2-ol-0-0-5720"><label>b</label><p>Viable cell number determined at day 7 post-seeding of 1&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup> cells (n=3/treatment group).</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn3-ol-0-0-5720"><label>c</label><p>Determined at day 21 post-seeding of 1&#x00D7;10<sup>3</sup> cells (n=12/treatment group). Results are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation. &#x03B1;=0.05 &#x003C;1 nM E<sub>2</sub> vs. 20 nM E<sub>2</sub>. Data was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett&#x0027;s test (&#x03B1;=0.05). E<sub>2</sub>, 17&#x03B2;-estradiol; AI, anchorage independent.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-ol-0-0-5720" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption><p>Inhibition of MCF-7 cell cycle progression by EG.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Cell cycle distribution<sup><xref rid="tfn4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">&#x0025; G<sub>1</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">&#x0025; S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">G<sub>1</sub>: S&#x002B;G<sub>2</sub>/M ratio</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Serum 0.7&#x0025; (&#x003C;1 nM E<sub>2</sub>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82.3&#x00B1;8.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17.8&#x00B1;1.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.6&#x00B1;0.5<sup><xref rid="tfn4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20 nM E<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67.3&#x00B1;6.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32.5&#x00B1;3.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.1&#x00B1;0. 2<sup><xref rid="tfn4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20 nM E<sub>2</sub> &#x002B; 1.0&#x0025; EG</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78.6&#x00B1;7.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.4&#x00B1;3.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.7&#x00B1;0.4<sup><xref rid="tfn4-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">d</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn4-ol-0-0-5720"><label>a</label><p>Determined following 48 h treatment. Results are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=3/treatment group). &#x03B1;=0.05 <sup>b</sup> vs. <sup>c</sup>; &#x03B1;=0.05 <sup>b</sup> vs. <sup>d</sup>; &#x03B1;=0.05 <sup>c</sup> vs. <sup>d</sup>. Data was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett&#x0027;s test (&#x03B1;=0.05). E<sub>2</sub>, 17&#x03B2;-estradiol; EG, <italic>Epimedium grandiflorum</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-ol-0-0-5720" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption><p>EG modulates the metabolism of E<sub>2</sub> in MCF-7 cells.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="4">E<sub>2</sub> metabolite concentration<sup><xref rid="tfn5-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup> (ng/1.0&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup> cells)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">E<sub>1</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">2-OHE<sub>1</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">16&#x03B1;-OHE<sub>1</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">E<sub>3</sub></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20 nM E<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.7&#x00B1;0.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.7&#x00B1;0.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.8&#x00B1;0.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.3&#x00B1;0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">20 nM E<sub>2</sub> &#x002B;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.7&#x00B1;0.6<sup><xref rid="tfn6-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.2&#x00B1;0.3<sup><xref rid="tfn7-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.2&#x00B1;0.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.0&#x00B1;0.9<sup><xref rid="tfn8-ol-0-0-5720" ref-type="table-fn">d</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.0&#x0025; EG</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn5-ol-0-0-5720"><label>a</label><p>Determined following 48 h. treatment. Results are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation (n=3/treatment group).</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn6-ol-0-0-5720"><label>b</label><p>P=0.01</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn7-ol-0-0-5720"><label>c</label><p>P=0.006</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn8-ol-0-0-5720"><label>d</label><p>P=0.001 compared with the 20 nM E<sub>2</sub> control group. Data was analyzed using the Student&#x0027;s t-test. E<sub>2</sub>, 17&#x03B2;-estradiol; E<sub>1</sub>, estrone; OHE<sub>1</sub>, hydroxyestrone; E<sub>3</sub>, estriol; EG, <italic>Epimedium grnadiflorum</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
