Introduction

Oncology Letters

1792-1074 1792-1082

D.A. Spandidos

10.3892/ol.2017.6630

OL-0-0-6630

Articles

Disease progression patterns of bevacizumab responders with recurrent malignant gliomas

Kim

Ju-Hwi

1 Jung

Tae-Young

1 Hwang

Eu Chang

2 Jung

Sung-Hoon

3 Jung

Shin

1 Kim

In-Young

1 Jang

Woo-Youl

1 Moon

Kyung-Sub

1 Lee

Kyung-Hwa

4 Kim

Seul-Kee

1Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea 2Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea 3Department of Hemato-oncology, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea 4Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea 5Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to: Dr Tae-Young Jung, Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, 322 Seoyang-ro, Gwangju, Chonnam 519-763, Republic of Korea, E-mail: jung-ty@chonnam.ac.kr

09 2017

20 07 2017

14 3 3529 3535 10052016 03032017

2017

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Tumor progression in patients with recurrent malignant glioma who respond to bevacizumab (BEV) is difficult to assess. The current study reviewed the clinical and radiological results of patients following a BEV-based chemotherapy regimen, and evaluated disease progression patterns in patients who responded to BEV therapy. From August 2011 to November 2015, 24 patients (18 glioblastoma cases and 6 anaplastic astrocytoma cases) were treated with BEV-based chemotherapy. In total, 6 patients were treated with BEV alone and 18 patients were treated with BEV combined with irinotecan. The male-female ratio was 10:14, and the median age was 47.5 years (range, 29–69). Patient performance status (PS) was classified using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS scores as follows: PS 1 (n=3), PS 2 (n=9), PS 3 (n=9) and PS 4 (n=3). Treatment-associated complications were also analyzed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Treatment responses were estimated using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) following treatment, patterns of disease progression and overall survival following treatment failure were also analyzed. The median PFS was 2.8 months (range, 0.6–10.1). In total, 2 patients did not continue treatment due to rectal bleeding and severe hematologic toxicity. Amongst the BEV responders (n=16, 72.7%), there was clinical deterioration without significant radiological progression in 2 patients (n=2, 12.5%). Radiological progression of non-enhancing lesions without enhancement flare-ups was observed in 6 patients (42.9%). A total of 3 of those lesions were diffuse and 3 were focal. Increased lesion enhancement was observed in 8 patients (57.1%). Of the non-responders (n=6, 27.3%), diffuse enlargement of non-enhancing lesions was detected in 2 patients and an increase in lesion enhancement occurred in 4 patients. BEV complete responders (n=3) radiologically progressed with enlarged T2/fluid attenuation inversion recovery lesions without enhancement, followed by enhancement flare-ups. Following BEV treatment failure, 8 patients received a number of adjuvant treatments and the overall survival was 4.5 months (range, 0.4–34.0). Clinical symptoms and radiological alterations of non-enhancing lesions must be evaluated in order to assess tumor progression in the BEV responders, particularly in patients who have achieved complete remission.

bevacizumab clinical radiological progression malignant glioma

Introduction

Bevacizumab (BEV; Avastin^®) is a monoclonal humanized antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). BEV-based chemotherapy has resulted in an objective radiological response of 19.6–37.8% and a median response duration of 3.0–11.0 months in high-grade gliomas (1–4). Even with the high radiological response rates to anti-angiogenic therapy, the majority of patients develop progressive disease within a year of treatment. Following treatment, alternative VEGF-independent pro-angiogenic growth factors may be activated, resulting in tumor resistance and aggressive tumor characteristics (5,6).

Following anti-angiogenic treatment, the blood-brain barrier may be restored (5). Contrast enhancement in T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI) and hyperintensity in T2/fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) images may be reduced, which causes the early detection of tumor progression to be challenging. In order to evaluate responses to an anti-angiogenic treatment such as BEV, MRI results, including T1-weighted images with contrast enhancement and T2/FLAIR images, and clinical status must be considered according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (7). However, there are certain vague aspects in determining tumor progression that only use the RANO criteria as this criteria does not assess the degree of T2/FLAIR alteration.

Tumor progression is difficult to identify in BEV responders with recurrent malignant glioma. Certain patients exhibit clinical deterioration without definitive radiological progression, and other patients exhibit progressive enlargement of non-enhancing lesions without neurological deterioration. Therefore, the present study reviewed clinical and radiological results following BEV-based chemotherapy, and evaluated patterns of disease progression in the BEV responders.

Materials and methods <sec> <title>Patient clinical and tumor characteristics

Between August 2011 and November 2015, surgery was performed on 6 patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and 18 patients with glioblastoma, which were classified according to the World Health Organization criteria 2007 (8). The Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (CNUHH-2016-052; Chonnam, Korea) approved the current study. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table I. The male-female ratio was 10:14 and the median age was 47.5 years (range, 29–69).

As an initial study, the extent of tumor removal was assessed using postoperative MRI, and removal using three subgroups was classified as follows: Gross total resection (no obvious residual tumor), subtotal resection (residual tumor, <50%) and partial resection (residual tumor, ≥50%). Tumors were completely removed from 6 patients (25.0%) and partially removed from 13 patients (54.2%). Biopsies were performed in 5 patients (20.8%). A total of 19 patients underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy. In total, 5 patients received surgery followed by radiotherapy alone. The median radiation dose was 59.4 Gy (range, 50.4–60.0). As adjuvant treatment prior to BEV-based chemotherapy, surgical resection was performed for recurred lesions in 6 patients, and chemotherapeutic regimens were as follows: Treatment with temozolomide was administered to 10 patients; procarbazine, CCNU and vincristine (PCV) regimens were administered to 9 patients; metronomic temozolomide was administered to 3 patients; an ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) regimen was administered to 1 patient. Gamma knife radiosurgery was performed on 3 patients and a single patient received additional radiation.

The patients were regularly treated using BEV (10 mg/kg body weight) alone or in combination with irinotecan (125 mg/m²) every 2 weeks. In total, 6 patients received BEV-only chemotherapy and 18 patients received BEV combined with irinotecan.

Treatment responses following BEV-based chemotherapy were estimated using the RANO criteria (7). The RANO criteria divides tumor responses into four types based on alterations in MRI and clinical features: Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). A target lesion was defined as a primary tumor site including any peritumoral edema and a new lesion was defined as a spatially-separate tumor within the brain. Radiological progression patterns were divided into dominant enhancing and non-enhancing lesions, according to the alterations in T1-enhancing and T2/FLAIR MRI images (Fig. 1). Non-enhancing lesion progression patterns were diffuse or focal. Additionally, clinical deterioration was considered a recurrence pattern. Ventricular subependymal enhancement was analyzed as evidence of cerebrospinal fluid dissemination on brain imaging studies.

Toxic effects were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE), with a score of 1 indicating mild adverse effects, 2 indicating moderate adverse effects, 3 indicating severe adverse effects, 4 indicating life-threatening adverse effects and 5 denoting mortality-associated with the adverse effects. Physical examinations, including neurological exams, blood pressure measurements and laboratory tests of blood and urine, were performed biweekly. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) scales were used to assess patient disease progression and to determine the appropriate treatment prognosis (9).

Statistical analysis

Follow-up durations were expressed as the median average and range. The effects of single variables on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were determined using univariate analyses. Single variables included pathologic grade, chemotherapeutic regimen, radiological progression pattern, associated subependymal enhancement and salvage treatment following BEV-based chemotherapy. PFS was calculated from the initiation of BEV-based chemotherapy to clinicoradiological disease progression; OS was calculated from the time of failure to respond to BEV-based chemotherapy to the date of mortality (or the last follow-up visit). PFS and OS probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results <sec> <title>Tumor response and toxicity of BEV-based chemotherapy

Prior to BEV-based treatment, the ECOG PS scores were 1 in 3 patients, 2 in 9 patients, 3 in 9 patients and 4 in 3 patients. In total, 2 patients discontinued treatment due to chemotherapy-associated complications that included rectal bleeding and severe hematologic toxicity following a single administration of BEV combined with irinotecan. A total of 22 patients received a median of 6 cycles (range, 2–18) of BEV, and treatment responses were analyzed using the RANO criteria. The objective tumor response rates were 13.6% CR, 45.5% PR, 13.6% SD and 27.3% PD. It was considered that CR, PR and SD were BEV-responsive, but PD was BEV-non-responsive.

According to CTCAE version 4.0, patients exhibited chemotherapy-associated complications, including grade 4 (n=2), grade 3 (n=1) and grade 2 (n=2) decreases in neutrophil counts, grade 3 hypertension (n=1), grade 2 platelet loss (n=1), grade 2 hemorrhoid bleeding (n=1), grade 1 epistaxis (n=2), grade 1 general muscle weakness (n=3) and grade 1 urticaria (n=1; Table I). Severe grade 3 and 4 toxicities occurred in 4/24 patients (16.7%).

The median PFS was 2.8 months (range, 0.6–10.1) following BEV-based chemotherapy. Depending on the pathology, the median PFS times were 3.2±0.4 months for patients with glioblastoma and 2.7±1.5 months for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (P=0.482; Fig. 2A). For chemotherapeutic regimens, the median PFS of patients who received BEV alone was 2.3±1.7 months, and that for patients who received BEV combined with irinotecan was 2.8±0.5 months (P=0.823; Fig. 2B).

Patterns of disease progression following BEV-based chemotherapy

Patterns of disease progression are summarized in Table I and Fig. 1. In BEV responders, clinical progression without definitive radiological progression was observed in 2/16 patients (12.5%). In total, 5 patients (31.3%) exhibited only radiological progression and 9 patients (56.2%) exhibited clinical and radiological progression.

For radiological progression in BEV responders, target lesions were dominant enhancing tumors in 8/14 patients (57.1%), and were non-enhancing tumors in 6/14 patients (42.9%). Out of the 6 patients with non-enhancing tumors, 3 had diffuse lesions and 3 had focal lesions. New lesions developed in 4 patients, of which 2 were enhancing lesions and 2 were non-enhancing lesions. For radiological disease progression in BEV non-responders, target lesions were dominant enhancing tumors in 4/6 patients (66.7%) and were diffuse non-enhancing tumors in 2 patients (33.3%). New lesions were observed in 2 patients, of which 1 was enhancing and 1 was non-enhancing. Subependymal enhancement was associated with 9/20 patients (45.0%), and included BEV responders and non-responders.

The radiological progression patterns in BEV complete responders

All enhancing lesions disappeared in the BEV complete responders (n=3), and non-enhancing lesions improved without any new lesions developing (Fig. 3). T2/FLAIR lesions enlarged in cases of radiological progression despite stable enhancing lesions, which were associated with clinical deterioration in 2 patients and not associated with clinical deterioration in 1 patient. All enlarged T2/FLAIR lesions with enhancement flare-ups were associated with clinical deterioration.

The overall survival rate following failure of BEV-based chemotherapy

The median OS was 4.5 months (range, 0.4–34.0) following BEV-based chemotherapy failure. In total, 8 patients (36.4%) received salvage therapies, including metronomic temozolomide (n=3), ICE chemotherapy (n=2), additional radiation therapy (n=2), PCV (n=1) and gamma knife radiosurgery (n=1). A total of 14 patients received supportive care. The median OS for patients who received salvage therapy was 5.1±0.7 months, as compared with 3.0±0.7 months for patients who received supportive care (P=0.297). According to radiological progression patterns, the median OS was 4.5±0.4 months for patients with dominant enhancing lesions, 4.4±2.6 months for patients with diffuse non-enhancing lesions and 3.3±0.8 months for patients with focal non-enhancing lesions (P=0.749; Fig. 4A). The median OS in patients with associated subependymal enhancement was 3.0±0.6 months, as compared with 5.1±0.5 months for those without subependymal enhancement (P=0.072; Fig. 4B).

Discussion

Malignant glial tumors are highly vascular and have increased expression levels of VEGF, which binds to VEGF receptors and promotes endothelial cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis (10). Anti-angiogenic therapy exhibits anti-tumor effects via inducing endothelial cell apoptosis, inhibiting novel vessel formation and decreasing tumor perfusion, which then results in tumor starvation (11). During initial treatment, abnormal tumor vasculature may be transiently normalized by reducing blood vessel diameter and permeability, which subsequently increases tumor perfusion, reduces interstitial pressure and improves tumor oxygenation (12). At this stage, the effects of radiotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents may potentially be improved (12). Augmentation of host immunity may also occur upon reducing VEGF-mediated immune suppression, which in turn improves the effects of immunotherapy (13). Augmentation of BEV-mediated benefits has been attempted using chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapy and irradiation (4,12,13). A previous study identified that BEV combined with CCNU improved the 6-month PFS rate to 41%, as compared with 18% for BEV alone (4). However, these combination therapies failed to improve survival beyond that conferred by monotherapy, which is explained by the effect of BEV decreasing drug delivery to the tumor (14). Finally, adaptive resistance promotes mesenchymal transition and increased invasiveness in response to BEV treatment (6). In the present study, BEV combined with irinotecan improved survival rates, as compared with BEV alone, although this was not to a statistically significant extent.

The majority of retrospective studies suggest that BEV may modestly improve patient outcomes (4,14,15). In the current study, the median PFS was 2.8 months. Responses to anti-angiogenic therapy occur rapidly, and tumor and edema volumes have been established to decrease within 6 weeks of therapy initiation (16,17). Anti-angiogenic therapy targeting the VEGF signaling pathway may promptly reduce vessel permeability and contrast media extravasation. This rapid and transient radiological alteration is called a ‘pseudoresponse’ (16,17). The decrease in edema was rapid and sustained, even following tumor progression. Tumor progression also occurs without necrosis, which differs from the recurrence patterns observed following treatment with other chemotherapeutic agents. Anti-angiogenic treatments have focused on brain tumor imaging in order to accurately define tumor responses and progression (16,17).

The radiological findings of BEV-induced chemotherapy responders differ from the typical radiological results of patients who did not receive BEV-based chemotherapy, as aforementioned. Enlargement of non-enhancing lesions with decreased or stable enhancing lesions are a typical relapse progression pattern following BEV-based chemotherapy, compared with typically deteriorating enhancing lesions following non-BEV chemotherapy (18,19). Flare-up of enhancing lesions and clinical deterioration without significant radiological alterations are observed in BEV chemotherapy responders. These characteristics were introduced into the revised RANO criteria (7). Enlarged T2/FLAIR lesions, despite stable enhancing lesions, are frequently present in BEV chemotherapy responders. The use of RANO criteria to assess responses would effectively estimate tumor progression, compared with other criteria that do not consider T2/FLAIR MRI results. The RANO criteria are reported to allow disease progression detection ~1 month earlier, as compared with criteria that do not account for T2/FLAIR imaging (20). However, these criteria do not state the degree of T2/FLAIR alterations required to define tumor progression, and these results may be treatment-associated alterations, including perioperative ischemia, inflammation, post-radiation demyelination and leukoencephalopathy. Furthermore, patterns of progression may differ amongst patients with malignant glioma (21). In the current study, clinical deterioration without definitive radiological alterations were detected in 12.5% of patients. Enlarged dominant enhancing lesions were noted in 57.1% of BEV-responders and non-enhancing lesions were observed in 42.9% of BEV responders. Among the radiological results, patients with tumors that had associated subependymal enhancement suggesting dissemination of tumor cells into the cerebrospinal fluid had a poor OS, as compared with patients with tumors lacking enhancement (P=0.072). Notably, the radiological progression of BEV complete responders primarily demonstrated progressive enlarged T2/FLAIR lesions, despite stable enhancing lesions with or without clinical deterioration. Enlarged T2/FLAIR lesions with enhancement flare-ups were associated with clinical deterioration in all patients. The progression of non-enhancing lesions may delay detection of treatment failure, particularly in BEV complete responders. This delay may potentially lead to an aggressive phenotype and be a negative prognostic factor.

Pharmacological inhibition of VEGF induces tumor hypoxia and the growth of bone marrow-derived cells, which then promotes the alternative angiogenesis pathway and tumor growth (22). Considering this, tumors may be more invasive and aggressive following anti-angiogenic treatment and, therefore, alternative salvage treatments must be considered following BEV-based chemotherapy failure. In one previous study, the median OS of patients was 5.6 months with heterogeneous salvage treatments following BEV failure, which was not reduced compared with that of the historical salvage treatments (18). In the present study, the median OS of patients was 4.5 months following BEV-based chemotherapy failure. A total of 8 patients (36.4%) received salvage therapies, which resulted in a median 5.3 month OS compared with a 2.6 month OS in the supportive care group.

In conclusion, for patients treated with BEV-based chemotherapy, caution is required to determine tumor progression based on clinical and radiological alterations. In certain cases, clinical deterioration without radiological alterations suggested tumor progression. Additionally, tumor progression through increased non-enhancing lesions was observed in numerous BEV-responders. Clinical symptoms and radiological alterations of non-enhancing lesions must be evaluated in order to assess tumor progression in the BEV responders, particularly those patients who experienced a complete response.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant (grant no. HCRI14029-1) from the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Research Institute of Clinical Medicine (Gwangju, Republic of Korea).

References 1

Levin

Mendelssohn

Chan

Stovall

Peak

Yee

Hui

Chen

Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma

J Neurooncol1221451502015

10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x

25575937

Friedman

Prados

Wen

Mikkelsen

Schiff

Abrey

Yung

Paleologos

Nicholas

Jensen

Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma

J Clin Oncol27473347402009

10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721

19720927

Kreisl

Kim

Moore

Duic

Royce

Stroud

Garren

Mackey

Butman

Camphausen

Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma

J Clin Oncol277407452009

10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055

19114704

Taal

Oosterkamp

Walenkamp

Dubbink

Beerepoot

Hanse

Buter

Honkoop

Boerman

de Vos

Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): A randomised controlled phase 2 trial

Lancet Oncol159439532014

10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70314-6

25035291

Bergers

Mechanisms of evasive resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in glioblastoma

CNS Oncol249652013

10.2217/cns.12.36

23750318

Piao

Liang

Holmes

Henry

Sulman

de Groot

Acquired resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in glioblastoma is associated with a mesenchymal transition

Clin Cancer Res19439244032013

10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1557

23804423

Wen

Macdonald

Reardon

Cloughesy

Sorensen

Galanis

Degroot

Wick

Gilbert

Lassman

Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group

J Clin Oncol28196319722010

10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541

20231676

Louis

Ohgaki

Wiestler

Cavenee

Burger

Jouvet

Scheithauer

Kleihues

The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system

Acta Neuropathol114971092007

10.1007/s00401-007-0278-6

17618441

Oken

Creech

Tormey

Horton

Davis

McFadden

Carbone

Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group

Am J Clin Oncol56496551982

10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014

7165009

Lamszus

Ulbricht

Matschke

Brockmann

Fillbrandt

Westphal

Levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 1 in astrocytic tumors and its relation to malignancy, vascularity, and VEGF-A

Clin Cancer Res9139914052003

12684411

Folkman

Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications

N Engl J Med285118211861971

10.1056/NEJM197111182852108

4938153

Winkler

Kozin

Tong

Chae

Booth

Garkavtsev

Hicklin

Fukumura

di Tomaso

Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: Role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases

Cancer Cell65535632004

10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00305-8

15607960

Shrimali

Theoret

Chinnasamy

Restifo

Rosenberg

Antiangiogenic agents can increase lymphocyte infiltration into tumor and enhance the effectiveness of adoptive immunotherapy of cancer

Cancer Res70617161802010

10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0153

20631075

Van der Veldt

Lubberink

Bahce

Walraven

de Boer

Greuter

Hendrikse

Eriksson

Windhorst

Postmus

Rapid decrease in delivery of chemotherapy to tumors after anti-VEGF therapy: Implications for scheduling of anti-angiogenic drugs

Cancer Cell2182912012

10.1016/j.ccr.2011.11.023

22264790

Batchelor

Reardon

de Groot

Wick

Weller

Antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: Current status and future prospects

Clin Cancer Res20561256192014

10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0834

25398844

Pope

Lai

Nghiemphu

Mischel

Cloughesy

MRI in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab and chemotherapy

Neurology66125812602006

10.1212/01.wnl.0000208958.29600.87

16636248

Ananthnarayan

Bahng

Roring

Nghiemphu

Lai

Cloughesy

Pope

Time course of imaging changes of GBM during extended bevacizumab treatment

J Neurooncol883393472008

10.1007/s11060-008-9573-x

18389177

Iwamoto

Abrey

Beal

Gutin

Rosenblum

Reuter

DeAngelis

Lassman

Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma

Neurology73120012062009

10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bc0184

19822869

Gaspar

Fisher

Macdonald

LeBer

Halperin

Schold

JrCairncross

Supratentorial malignant glioma: Patterns of recurrence and implications for external beam local treatment

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2455571992

10.1016/0360-3016(92)91021-E

1512163

Gallego

Pérez-Larraya J

Lahutte

Petrirena

Reyes-Botero

González-Aguilar

Houillier

Guillevin

Sanson

Hoang-Xuan

Delattre

Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: Comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria

Neuro Oncol146676732012

10.1093/neuonc/nos070

22492961

Nowosielski

Wiestler

Goebel

Hutterer

Schlemmer

Stockhammer

Wick

Bendszus

Radbruch

Progression types after antiangiogenic therapy are related to outcome in recurrent glioblastoma

Neurology82168416922014

10.1212/WNL.0000000000000402

24727314

Petritsch

Liu

Ganss

Passegué

Song

Vandenberg

Johnson

Werb

Bergers

HIF1alpha induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion

Cancer Cell132062202008

10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.034

18328425

Figure 1.

Radiological progression patterns according to T1-enhancing and T2/FLAIR MRI images. (A) Dominant enhancing lesion. (B) Diffuse T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesion without an enhancement flare-up. (C) Focal T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesion without an enhancement flare-up. (D) Associated subependymal enhancement (red arrow). CE, contrast enhancement; FLAIR, fluid attenuation inversion recovery; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS rate. (A) Depending on pathology, the median PFS of patients with glioblastoma was 3.2±0.4 months, and that of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma was 2.7±1.5 months (P=0.482). (B) Depending on the chemotherapeutic regimen, the median PFS of patients who received BEV alone was 2.3±1.7 months, and that of patients who received BEV combined with irinotecan was 2.8±0.5 months (P=0.823).

Figure 3.

The radiological progression patterns in BEV complete responders. (A) The pre-treatment state is presented. (B) In a complete response following BEV-based chemotherapy, all enhancing lesions disappeared and the non-enhancing lesions improved without new lesions. (C) In radiological progression, the T2/FLAIR lesion was enlarged (red arrow) despite stable enhancing lesions. (D) In radiological progression, enlarged T2/FLAIR lesions with enhancement flare-ups (sky blue arrow) were observed. CE, contrast enhancement; BEV, bevacizumab; FLAIR, fluid attenuation inversion recovery.

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier curves for OS rate. (A) According to radiological progression patterns, the median OS was 4.5±0.4 months for patients with predominant enhancing lesions, 4.4±2.6 months for patients with diffuse non-enhancing lesions and 3.3±0.8 months for patients with focal non-enhancing lesions (P=0.749). (B) The median OS for patients with associated subependymal enhancement was 3.0±0.6 months, and 5.1±0.5 months for patients without subependymal enhancement (P=0.072). PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; BEV, bevacizumab.

Table I.

Clinical and radiological characteristics of patients who received BEV-based chemotherapy.

A. Characteristics of all patients

Variable	n=24 (%)
Gender
Male	10 (41.7)
Female	14 (58.3)
Median age	47.5 years (range, 29–69)
Pathology
Glioblastoma	18 (75.0)
Anaplastic astrocytoma	6 (25.0)
ECOG PS
1, 2	3, 9 (50.0)
3, 4	9, 3 (50.0)
BEV chemotherapy
Alone	6 (25.0)
Combined with Irinotecan	18 (75.0)
Treatment-associated complications (CTCAE 4.0)
Neutrophil loss
Grade 4	2
Grade 3	1
Grade 2	2
Hypertension
Grade 3	1
Platelet loss
Grade 2	1
Hemorrhoid bleeding
Grade 2	1
Epistaxis
Grade 1	2
General muscle weakness
Grade 1	3
Urticaria
Grade 1	1

B. Response evaluation

Variable	n=22 (%)

Best response (RANO criteria)
Complete response	3 (13.6)
Partial response	10 (45.5)
Stable response	3 (13.6)
Progressive disease	6 (27.3)
Progression-free survival, months	Median, 2.8 (range, 0.6–10.1)

C. Disease progression patterns in BEV responders

Variable	n=16 (%)

Only clinical progression	2 (12.5)
Only radiological progression	5 (31.3)
Clinical and radiological progression	9 (56.2)

D. Radiological disease progression in BEV responders

Variable	n=14 (%)

Target lesions
Dominant enhancing lesions	8 (57.1)
Dominant non-enhancing lesions	6 (42.9)
Diffuse	3
Focal	3
New lesions	4
Dominant enhancing lesions	2
Dominant non-enhancing lesions	2

E. Radiological progressive disease in BEV non-responders

Variable	n=6 (%)

Target lesions
Dominant enhancing lesions	4 (66.7)
Dominant non-enhancing lesions	2 (33.3)
Diffuse	2
Focal	0
New lesions	2
Predominant enhancing lesion	1
Predominant non-enhancing lesion	1
Subependymal enhancement	9/20 (45.0)

CTCAE, National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0; RANO, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology; BEV, bevacizumab.