<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OL</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oncology Letters</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-1074</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1082</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2018.7930</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OL-0-0-7930</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Clinical significance and effect of Sam68 expression in gastric cancer</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Jinzhang</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Qiuhong</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Qichang</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Hua</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Qiang</surname><given-names>Fulin</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Jin</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Lei</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="c2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yingying</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="c1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ol-0-0-7930"><label>1</label>Department of Internal Oncology Medicine, Affiliated Nantong Cancer Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af2-ol-0-0-7930"><label>2</label>The Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Inflammation and Molecular Drug Target, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, P.R. China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ol-0-0-7930"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Professor Yingying Wang, The Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory for Inflammation and Molecular Drug Target, Nantong University, 19 Qixiu Road, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, P.R. China, E-mail: <email>wang_yingying@ntu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c2-ol-0-0-7930">Dr Lei Yang, Department of Internal Oncology Medicine, Affiliated Nantong Cancer Hospital, Nantong University, 48 Qingnianxi Road, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, P.R. China, E-mail: <email>nt_yanglei@sina.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>04</month>
<year>2018</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2018</year></pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>4745</fpage>
<lpage>4752</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Xiao et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of malignancy worldwide. However, the molecular mechanisms of cancer development remain unclear. Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa (Sam68) is involved in cell proliferation, transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis in several types of cancer. The present study aimed to assess the expression and function of Sam68 in human gastric cancer. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry indicated that Sam68 expression was increased in tumor samples and the levels were associated with the grade of malignancy. High Sam68 expression was associated with the poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. <italic>In vitro</italic>, following knockdown of Sam68 by transfection of gastric cancer cells with small interfering RNA, the cell viability, cell cycle progress, migration and invasion were decreased. The results of the present study revealed that Sam68 may be a novel prognostic factor for, and is associated with cell growth, migration and invasion in, gastric cancer.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>gastric cancer</kwd>
<kwd>Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa</kwd>
<kwd>proliferation</kwd>
<kwd>migration</kwd>
<kwd>metastasis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of malignant tumors worldwide, and is possibly the main cause of cancer-associated mortality (<xref rid="b1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). The incidence of gastric cancer varies across populations, with almost two-thirds of gastric cancer cases and mortalities occurring in less developed regions (<xref rid="b2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Despite a decline in the incidence of gastric cancer in the West, it remains one of the most frequent types of cancer diagnosed in China. There has been no significant change in the number of cases of gastric cancer-associated mortality, and the treatment methods remain challenging (<xref rid="b3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Although a previous study has indicated that several mechanisms are involved in the development of gastric cancer, its pathogenesis remains unclear (<xref rid="b4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>).</p>
<p>Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa (Sam68), which was originally identified as a substrate for Src kinase, is a member of the signal transduction and activation of splicing RNA family of K homology (KH) domain-containing RNA-binding proteins (<xref rid="b5-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). Sam68 is ubiquitously expressed in numerous tissues and cell lines, and it performs important roles in gene transcription, signaling transduction and alternative splicing via the phosphorylation modification (<xref rid="b7-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). Sam68 has deregulated expression, and it is involved in the promotion of cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis in numerous types of cancer (<xref rid="b8-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). However, at present, it is uncertain whether Sam68 has clinical significance in gastric cancer. Therefore, the present study investigated the expression of Sam68 in gastric cancer samples to identify its potential prognostic role.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patients and tissue samples</title>
<p>In this retrospective study, a total of 161 surgically-resected gastric cancer tissue specimens (53 male and 108 female; 24&#x2013;72 year of age), obtained from patients who were enrolled according to the 7th edition of the International System of Staging for Gastric Cancer (<xref rid="b4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>), were collected at the Affiliated Nantong Cancer Hospital of Nantong University (Nantong, China) between February 2004 and February 2007. Patient baseline demographics, clinicopathological characteristics and surgical approach information was collected following a review of the clinical notes and histopathology reports. Outcome data, including long-term survival, were recorded. None of the patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy prior to tumor resection. Patients with disease recurrence or metastasis were treated with platinum-based systemic chemotherapy. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Nantong Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Western blot analysis</title>
<p>Frozen gastric cancer samples were homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1&#x0025; SDS, 0.5&#x0025; sodium deoxycholate and 1&#x0025; Triton X-100). Following centrifugation at 12,000 &#x00D7; g for 20 min at 4&#x00B0;C, 60 &#x00B5;g total protein from each sample was resolved with 10&#x0025; SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Subsequent to blocking with 5&#x0025; non-fat milk at room temperature for 60 min, the membranes were incubated with rabbit monoclonal antibodies against Sam68 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-4249; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) and GAPDH (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. sc-47724; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 4&#x00B0;C overnight. Membranes were then washed with TBS-Tween-20 (TBST) and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (dilution, 1:10,000; cat. no. sc-2030; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 60 min at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the membrane was developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (EMD Millipore). The intensities of the protein bands were determined by densitometry using ImageJ software (version 2.1; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Immunohistochemistry</title>
<p>The gastric cancer tissues were fixed with 10&#x0025; formalin for 24 h at room temperature and then embedded with paraffin at 60&#x00B0;C for 5 min. The 8-&#x00B5;m thick slides were immersed in EDTA (pH 8.0) and incubated for 20 min in a microwave oven for antigen retrieval. Subsequent to rinsing with PBS, endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3&#x0025; hydrogen peroxide in PBS at room temperature for 15 min. The slides were incubated with anti-Sam68 antibody (dilution, 1:50; cat. no. sc-4249; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) in a humidified chamber at 4&#x00B0;C overnight. Following additional washing with PBS three times, the sections were sequentially incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (dilution, 1:100; cat. no. sc-6772; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 37&#x00B0;C for 30 min and then washed three times with PBS. Finally, diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was used for the signal development. Subsequently, 10&#x0025; hematoxylin staining buffer (cat. no. H9627; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was added to stain the nucleus at room temperature for 30 sec. PBS was used as a negative control. Immunoreactivity was detected using light microscopy (DM2000, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and evaluated independently by two experienced gynecopathologists blinded to the clinical data. The detection of Sam68 expression was performed as previously reported (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). To analyze the staining of Sam68 in these tissue, the 100 hematoxylin-positive cells in which Sam68 was also positive were identified. The staining proportion was scored as follows: 0, no positive cells; 1, &#x003C;10&#x0025; positive cells; 2, 10&#x2013;35&#x0025; positive cells; 3, 35&#x2013;70&#x0025; positive cells; 4, &#x003E;70&#x0025; positive cells. Staining intensity was graded according to the method of mean optical density: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining (light yellow); 2, moderate staining (yellow brown); 3, strong staining (brown). The immunoreactivity score (IRS) was calculated as the product of the staining intensity score and the percentage of positive cells that ranged between 0 and 12. Optimized cutoff points for each categorical score were determined using log-rank statistics. This scoring was based on the assumption that a staining index score &#x2265;6 indicated high Sam68 expression, whereas a staining index score &#x2264;6 indicated low Sam68 expression as previous reported (<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture and small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection</title>
<p>AGS cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco&#x0027;s modified Eagle&#x0027;s medium (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10&#x0025; fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 &#x00B5;g/ml streptomycin in 5&#x0025; CO<sub>2</sub> at 37&#x00B0;C. The Sam68-specific siRNA, which targets the sequences 5&#x2032;-TGGGATGGAGTGATAGTA-3&#x2032;, 5&#x2032;-AACGAAACTGGCTTTGAAA-3&#x2032;, 5&#x2032;-TTTGTACCACATATCCCAT-3&#x2032; and 5&#x2032;-CATTTGTGACCTATGCCAT-3&#x2032;, and non-targeting control siRNA (5&#x2032;-TCGTCGTTACCTCTTTCC-3&#x2032;) were designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in compliance with the manufacturer&#x0027;s protocol. Transfections were performed for 48 h at 37&#x00B0;C, and the efficacy of gene silencing was assessed by western blot analysis as aforementioned (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell proliferation, migration and invasion analysis</title>
<p>Cell proliferation was assessed with the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan), according to the kit&#x0027;s protocol, and the absorbance of the samples was measured with a plate reader at 370 nm. The cell migration ability was assessed via a wound healing assay. Equal numbers (1&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup>) of transfected AGS cells were seeded onto 6-well tissue culture plates. When the cells reached 90&#x0025; confluence, a scratch wound was created in the center of the cell monolayer by gently removing the attached cells with a sterile plastic pipette tip. The debris was removed by washing the cells in serum-free culture medium. Cells bordering the wound were visualized and images were captured under an inverted microscope at magnification, &#x00D7;400 (Leica Microsystems GmbH) 24 h after the wound was created. After wound healing from the initial distance, the migrated distances of the cells into the wounded areas were calculated by subtracting the distance at 24 h before. A total of nine areas were selected randomly from each well by light microscopy at magnification, &#x00D7;400 and the cells in the triplicate wells of each group were quantified using ImageJ (version, 2.1; National Institutes of Health) in each experiment. Cells were also used for invasion assays performed as previously described (<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Transwell filters were coated on the upper side with 30 mg Matrigel (100 &#x00B5;g/&#x00B5;l; EMD Millipore) for 2 h at 37&#x00B0;C, and then 1&#x00D7;10<sup>6</sup> cells were subcultured on the Transwell filter. Following incubation for 24 h at 37&#x00B0;C, cells on the lower surface of the chamber were fixed with PBS containing 4&#x0025; paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 24 h and stained with PBS which contained 1&#x0025; toluidine blue at room temperature for 30 min, prior to being counted under at magnification, &#x00D7;400 by light microscopy. In all experiments, data were collected from triplicate chambers.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Flow cytometry</title>
<p>To investigate the cell cycle distribution, 10<sup>6</sup> AGS cells were fixed with 70&#x0025; ethanol at room temperature for 2 h, and then washed with PBS which contained 1&#x0025; bovine serum albumin (BSA; Fluka; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) as the blocking step three times for 5 min each at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were incubated with 40 &#x00B5;g/ml of RNase and 50 &#x00B5;g/ml of propidium iodide (PI) dissolved in 1&#x0025; BSA/PBS at room temperature for 30 min. The PI content per cell was measured with a flow cytometer. The data were analyzed using ModFit 4.1 software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for cell-cycle analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fluorescence microscopy</title>
<p>A total of 10<sup>3</sup> ASG cells were fixed with cold PBS containing 4&#x0025; paraformaldehyde at 4&#x00B0;C for 20 min, permeabolized with 0.1&#x0025; Triton X-100 for 10 min and then blocked with 1&#x0025; BSA/PBS for 2 h. Following washing in PBS, the cells were incubated with TRITC-conjugated phalloidin (dilution, 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) and Hoechst (dilution, 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 30 min at room temperature, then examined under a Leica confocal fluorescence microscope (DL3500; Leica Microsystems GmbH) at magnification, &#x00D7;400.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Levels of Sam68 are expressed as the median and standard deviation. Due to the non-normal distribution of these parameters in all groups, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the association between Sam68 levels and the clinicopathological characteristics. Spearman&#x0027;s correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations between continuous variables. Univariate survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine an independent effect on survival using the Cox proportional hazards method. P&#x003C;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Expression of Sam68 in gastric cancer and adjacent normal tissue</title>
<p>To determine the expression of Sam68, total proteins were extracted from eight frozen matched gastric cancer and adjacent normal tissues, and Sam68 expression was detected by western blot analysis (<xref rid="f1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>). Sam68 protein was highly expressed in gastric cancer samples compared with in the adjacent normal tissue. In addition, immunochemistry was used to investigate Sam68 expression in the tissue samples. In gastric cancer and adjacent normal tissue, Sam68 was predominantly found in the nucleus, although weak cytoplasmic immunoreaction was also observed. Representative examples of reactivity for Sam68 are presented in <xref rid="f1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1B</xref>. Absent or low Sam68 expression was observed in adjacent normal tissue, while Sam68 expression was upregulated in gastric cancer samples. A total of 161 cases of gastric cancer were evaluated, and Sam68 expression was negative/low in 78 cases (48.4&#x0025;) and high in 83 cases (51.6&#x0025;).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Association of Sam68 expression with clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer</title>
<p>The clinicopathological data of the patients are summarized in <xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>. As listed in <xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>, the associations of Sam68 expression with clinical variables were evaluated. Sam68 expression was significantly associated with tumor grade (P=0.003), infiltration depth (P=0.001), tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P=0.012) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.001), whereas no association was observed between Sam68 and age (P=0.224), sex (P=0.125) and nerve invasion (P=0.987) (<xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). Furthermore, the association between Sam68 and cell proliferation marker Ki-67 was investigated; in the majority of specimens, the proportion of Sam68-positive tumor cells was similar to the proportion of Ki-67-positive tumor cells (P&#x003C;0.001; <xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Association between Sam68 and patient survival</title>
<p>At the end of clinical follow-up of 60 months, survival information was available in 161 cases of 161 patients (100&#x0025;). Of these 161 patients, only 34 of 83 (40.9&#x0025;) patients in the Sam68 high expression group were alive vs. 61 of 78 (78.2&#x0025;) in the Sam68 low expression group (<xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). When all variables were compared separately with survival status, only tumor grade (P=0.047), infiltration depth (P=0.030), lymph node metastasis (P=0.015), Sam68 (P=0.008) and Ki-67 (P=0.025) significantly affected survival (<xref rid="tII-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). In survival rate analysis, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that high Sam68 expression was associated with a poor survival, with statistical significance (<xref rid="f2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Cox&#x0027;s proportional hazards regression model revealed that Sam68 expression serves as an independent marker in patients with gastric cancer (<xref rid="tIII-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Sam68 expression on cell proliferation in gastric cancer cells</title>
<p>Based on the present study, the role of Sam68 in the proliferation of gastric cancer cells was elucidated. As previously reported, cells were arrested in the G<sup>1</sup> phase through serum deprivation for 72 h. Upon serum addition, the cells reentered the S phase (<xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>). Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of Sam68 was increased as early as 12 h after serum stimulation (<xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3B</xref>). To detect the role of Sam68 on cell proliferation, siRNAs were used to suppress Sam68 expression. The third siRNA resulted in an ~60&#x0025; decrease in Sam68 protein expression compared with the control siRNA (<xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3C</xref>). In addition, the suppression of endogenous Sam68 effectively inhibited cell viability, the cell cycle and colony formation ability of gastric cancer cells (<xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3D-F</xref>). Cell cycle-associated protein expression levels were detected in Sam68-knockdown gastric cells. As presented in <xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3G</xref>, the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4, CDK6, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and cyclin D1 was markedly decreased in Sam68-siRNA-transfected cells, and p16 was increased. Combined, these results confirmed that Sam68 promotes cell proliferation in gastric cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Effect of Sam68 expression on gastric cancer cell migration and invasion</title>
<p>In the present study, the effect of Sam68 on cancer metastasis was detected. <xref rid="f4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref> depicts representative photo-micrographs captured at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after the cell monolayer wounding. The migratory capacity of cells transfected with siRNA targeting Sam68 was significantly decreased compared with cells transfected with non-specific siRNA (<xref rid="f4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref>). The effect of Sam68 on the invasion of cell lines was then detected via a Transwell assay. Depletion of Sam68 by siRNA decreased the number of invading cells compared with the control (<xref rid="f4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4B</xref>). Furthermore, it was revealed that the F-actin distribution in Sam68-knockdown cells was abnormal when compared with the control group (<xref rid="f4-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4C</xref>). Combined, the present data indicated that Sam68 may perform a vital role in cell migration and invasion.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In recent years, mounting evidence has demonstrated that Sam68 is involved in regulating the expression of genes relevant to multiple human diseases (<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="b12-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). However, the deregulation of Sam68 has only been reported in certain human cancer types, and it is unclear whether the deregulation of Sam68 is also an event in human gastric cancer. The current study indicated that Sam68 expression was significantly elevated in gastric cancer tissues, as compared with in adjacent non-cancerous tissues.</p>
<p>Sam68 is a substrate of the oncogenic Src kinase, which is frequently activated in cancer (<xref rid="b13-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). Current data regarding the role of Sam68 are context-dependent and contrary (<xref rid="b14-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). A previous study indicated that Sam68 functions as a tumor suppressor. Sam68 deficiency resulted in the neoplastic transformation of murine NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, and Sam68 downregulation was associated with the capacity to form metastatic tumors in nude mice, whereas the overexpression of Sam68 in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (<xref rid="b8-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). By contrast, studies have demonstrated that Sam68 acts as an oncogene (<xref rid="b15-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Sam68 haploid sufficiency delays the onset of mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis in nude mice (<xref rid="b16-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). Bus&#x00E0; <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b17-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>) established that Sam68 is upregulated in prostate cancer, and that Sam68 downregulation delayed the cell cycle progression and reduced prostate cancer cell proliferation. The upregulation of Sam68 is also associated with shorter survival time in cervical, gastric and renal cell carcinoma (<xref rid="b18-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). The current study revealed that Sam68 is elevated in gastric cancer tissues, and that high Sam68 expression levels are significantly associated with the characteristics of aggressive gastric cancer, including advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. In addition, the results demonstrated that Sam68 can promote the development and progression of gastric cancer, supporting the oncogenic role of Sam68 in cancer. Furthermore, high Sam68 expression levels may function as an independent biomarker for gastric cancer prognosis.</p>
<p>In the majority of cells, Sam68 predominantly resides within the nucleus and is involved in gene transcription, alternative splicing and nuclear export (<xref rid="b19-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). In the present study, Sam68 was determined to localize in cancer cell nuclei (<xref rid="b17-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="b20-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>). However, contrary to the present results, the cytoplasmic localization of Sam68 was significantly associated with poor prognosis and progression in renal cell carcinoma and gastric cancer. This may be due to the varying functions of Sam68 in various signaling pathways, and the cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of Sam68 could contribute to neoplastic transformation or tumor progression through different molecular mechanisms in varying cancer types or cellular contexts (<xref rid="b21-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b23-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, the present study evaluated the potential of Sam68 as a clinically relevant indicator for patients with gastric cancer. Additional studies of the mechanisms underlying the involvement of Sam68 in the development and progression of gastric cancer are required.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ol-0-0-7930"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Investigation the mechanism of the apoptosis induced by lactacystin in gastric cancer cells</article-title><source>Tumour Biol</source><volume>36</volume><fpage>3465</fpage><lpage>3470</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13277-014-2982-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25541208</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ol-0-0-7930"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mimica</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Babi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Karin</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bevanda</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Alfirevi&#x0107;</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Godler</surname><given-names>&#x011E;</given-names></name><name><surname>Karan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gastric cancer with bone marrow invasion presenting as severe thrombocytopenia</article-title><source>Turk J Gastroenterol</source><volume>25</volume><supplement>Suppl 1</supplement><fpage>S229</fpage><lpage>S230</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5152/tjg.2014.4660</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ol-0-0-7930"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Jang</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Mok</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Pattern, timing and survival in patients with recurrent gastric cancer</article-title><source>Hepatogastroenterology</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>1148</fpage><lpage>1153</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26158179</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ol-0-0-7930"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sobin</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Gospodarowicz</surname><given-names>MK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wittekind</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><source>TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors</source><edition>7th</edition><publisher-name>Wiley-Blackwell</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc><year>2010</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ol-0-0-7930"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quintana-Portillo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Canfr&#x00E1;n-Duque</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Issad</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-Margalet</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez-Yanes</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 interacts with IRS1</article-title><source>Biochem Pharmacol</source><volume>83</volume><fpage>78</fpage><lpage>87</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bcp.2011.09.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22005517</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ol-0-0-7930"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaughan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalgliesh</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Sherif</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Robson</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Elliott</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The RNA-binding and adaptor protein Sam68 modulates signal-dependent splicing and transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor</article-title><source>J Pathol</source><volume>215</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/path.2324</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18273831</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ol-0-0-7930"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Suhasini</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Artzt</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong-Staal</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A role for KH domain proteins (Sam68-like mammalian proteins and quaking proteins) in the post-transcriptional regulation of HIV replication</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>277</volume><fpage>5778</fpage><lpage>5784</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M106836200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11741900</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ol-0-0-7930"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pedrotti</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bielli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Paronetto</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciccosanti</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Fimia</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Stamm</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Manley</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Sette</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The splicing regulator Sam68 binds to a novel exonic splicing silencer and functions in SMN2 alternative splicing in spinal muscular atrophy</article-title><source>EMBO J</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1235</fpage><lpage>1247</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2010.19</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20186123</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ol-0-0-7930"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ke</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Upregulation of CDK7 in gastric cancer cell promotes tumor cell proliferation and predicts poor prognosis</article-title><source>Exp Mol Pathol</source><volume>100</volume><fpage>514</fpage><lpage>521</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.yexmp.2016.05.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27155449</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ol-0-0-7930"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The RNA-binding protein Sam68 regulates tumor cell viability and hepatic carcinogenesis by inhibiting the transcriptional activity of FOXOs</article-title><source>J Mol Histol</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>485</fpage><lpage>497</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10735-015-9639-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26438629</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ol-0-0-7930"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huot</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lamarche-Vane</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An adaptor role for cytoplasmic Sam68 in modulating Src activity during cell polarization</article-title><source>Mol Cell Biol</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>1933</fpage><lpage>1943</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.01707-08</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19139276</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ol-0-0-7930"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huot</surname><given-names>M&#x00C9;</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Zabarauskas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ngo</surname><given-names>CT</given-names></name><name><surname>Coulombe-Huntington</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Majewski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Sam68 STAR RNA-binding protein regulates mTOR alternative splicing during adipogenesis</article-title><source>Mol Cell</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molcel.2012.02.007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22424772</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ol-0-0-7930"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-Jim&#x00E9;nez</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-Margalet</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Role of Sam68 in post-transcriptional gene regulation</article-title><source>Int J Mol Sci</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>23402</fpage><lpage>23419</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms141223402</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24287914</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ol-0-0-7930"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stockley</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Markert</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Robson</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Elliott</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindberg</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The RNA-binding protein Sam68 regulates expression and transcription function of the androgen receptor splice variant AR-V7</article-title><source>Sci Rep</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>13426</fpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep13426</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26310125</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ol-0-0-7930"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Wier</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hodgson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>DQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 modulates the promoter specificity of NF-&#x03BA;B and mediates expression of CD25 in activated T cells</article-title><source>Nat Commun</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>1909</fpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms2916</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23715268</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ol-0-0-7930"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogel</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Huot</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Muller</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lukong</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 haploinsufficiency delays onset of mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis</article-title><source>Oncogene</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>548</fpage><lpage>556</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.onc.1210652</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17621265</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ol-0-0-7930"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bus&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Geremia</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sette</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Genotoxic stress causes the accumulation of the splicing regulator Sam68 in nuclear foci of transcriptionally active chromatin</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Res</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>3005</fpage><lpage>3018</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkq004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110258</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ol-0-0-7930"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bus&#x00E0;</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Paronetto</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Farini</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pierantozzi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Botti</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Angelini</surname><given-names>DF</given-names></name><name><surname>Attisani</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Vespasiani</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Sette</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The RNA-binding protein Sam68 contributes to proliferation and survival of human prostate cancer cells</article-title><source>Oncogene</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>4372</fpage><lpage>4382</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.onc.1210224</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17237817</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ol-0-0-7930"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lock</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Fumagalli</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Polakis</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>McCormick</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Courtneidge</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The human p62 cDNA encodes Sam68 and not the RasGAP-associated p62 protein</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>84</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>24</lpage><year>1996</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80989-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8548822</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ol-0-0-7930"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 regulates S6K1 alternative splicing during adipogenesis</article-title><source>Mol Cell Biol</source><volume>35</volume><fpage>1926</fpage><lpage>1939</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.01488-14</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25776557</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ol-0-0-7930"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 is a novel marker for aggressive neuroblastoma</article-title><source>Onco Targets Ther</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>1751</fpage><lpage>1760</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24324342</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ol-0-0-7930"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Modem</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Badri</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Holland</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 is absolutely required for Rev function and HIV-1 production</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Res</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>873</fpage><lpage>879</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gki231</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15701759</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ol-0-0-7930"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paronetto</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Messina</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Barchi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Geremia</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sette</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sam68 marks the transcriptionally active stages of spermatogenesis and modulates alternative splicing in male germ cells</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Res</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>4961</fpage><lpage>4974</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkr085</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21355037</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Expression of Sam68 in human gastric cancer. (A) Western blot analysis revealed high Sam68 protein levels in gastric cancer. GAPDH was assessed as a loading control. The bar chart demonstrates the ratio of Sam68 protein to GADPH using densitometry analysis. The data are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation of three independent experiments. (B) Paraffin-embedded gastric (normal) or gastric cancer tissue sections (well, moderate, poor) were stained with antibodies against Sam68, and then counterstained with hematoxylin (Scale bar, 100 &#x00B5;m). Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-15-04-4745-g00.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p>Kaplan-Meier postoperative survival curve for the survival analysis of Sam68 in gastric cancer. Based on mean Sam68 percentages, patients were divided into high Sam68 expressers and low Sam68 expressers. Patients in the Sam68 high expression group had significantly shorter overall survival time compared with patients in the Sam68 low expression group (P=0.024). Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-15-04-4745-g01.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption><p>Silencing of Sam68 decreases gastric cancer cell growth. (A) Cells synchronized at G<sub>0</sub>/G<sub>1</sub> progressed in the cell cycle when the S72 h cells were released by reseeding with serum for 0 (0 h=S72 h), 4, 8, 12, 24 or 48 h. (B) Cell lysates of the corresponding time point were prepared and analyzed by western blot analysis using antibodies against Sam68 and GAPDH. (C) The expression of Sam68 was detected by western blot analysis following transfection with Sam68 siRNA, while Sam68 siRNA3 achieved the best downregulation effect. (D) Equal numbers of control-siRNA transfected and Sam68-siRNA transfected cells were seeded onto 60-mm plates. Cells were fixed and stained with giemsa after 14 days. The number of Sam68-siRNA cell colonies was significantly less than that of the control-siRNA cells. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, compared with the control cells. (E) Growth curves of cells transfected with the Sam68 siRNA or control siRNA were drawn. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, compared with the control cells. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of the cell cycle distribution of cells transfected with the Sam68 siRNA or control siRNA. (G) Western blot analysis indicated the effect of Sam68-knockdown on the protein expression of CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, PCNA and p16. Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; siRNA, small interfering RNA.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-15-04-4745-g02.tiff"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption><p>Tumor cell motility and cytoskeleton organization are altered by Sam68. (A) Monolayer cells transfected with control or Sam68 siRNA were analyzed for wound closure after 24, 48 and 72 h. Scale bar, 100 &#x00B5;m. (B) The indicated siRNA-transfected cells were assessed for invasive ability using Matrigel inserts after 24 h. Scale bar, 100 &#x00B5;m. (C) The F-actin cytoskeleton (red) in the control and siRNA-transfected cells was stained and analyzed via fluorescence microscopy (left column). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue; middle column). The right column denotes composite images of both F-actin and Hoechst staining. Scale bar, 100 &#x00B5;m. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, compared with control cells; <sup>#</sup>P&#x003C;0.05, compared with siRNA Sam68 cells. Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa; siRNA, small interfering RNA.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-15-04-4745-g03.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption><p>Sam68 expression and clinicopathological characteristics on 161 gastric specimens.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Sam68 expression, n</th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Total, n</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Low (78)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">High (83)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;60 years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;60 years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sex</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">108</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor grade</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.003<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Well</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Poor and others</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Infiltration depth</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Inferior mucous membrane layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Muscular layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Serous layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TNM stage</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.012<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;I&#x2013;II</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;III&#x2013;IV</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lymph node</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">145</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">81</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nerve invasion</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.987</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">50</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Survival status</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.008<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Alive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Dead</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">66</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ki-67 expression</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">67</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-ol-0-0-7930"><label>a</label><p>P&#x003C;0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the Pearson &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test. TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption><p>Contribution of various potential prognostic factors to survival by univariate analysis in 161 gastric specimens.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Survival status, n</th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Total, n</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Died</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Alive</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.209</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;60 years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;60 years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sex</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.664</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">108</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">43</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">65</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor grade</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.047<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Well</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Moderate</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">82</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Poor and others</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">31</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Infiltration depth</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.030<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Inferior mucous membrane layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Muscular layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Serous layer</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TNM stage</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.127</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;I&#x2013;II</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;III&#x2013;IV</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lymph node</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.015<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">145</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">64</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">81</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Nerve invasion</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.587</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">37</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">59</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sam68 expression</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.008<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">17</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">83</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">49</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ki-67 expression</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.025<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">47</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">51</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn2-ol-0-0-7930"><label>a</label><p>P&#x003C;0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by Pearson &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test. TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-ol-0-0-7930" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption><p>Contribution of various potential prognostic factors to survival by Cox regression analysis in 161 gastric specimens.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Category</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">95&#x0025; confidence interval</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Tumor grade</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.875&#x2013;2.053</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">TNM stage</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.038&#x2013;2.838</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.035<sup><xref rid="tfn3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Lymph node</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.362&#x2013;28.857</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.018<sup><xref rid="tfn3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Sam68 expression</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.687&#x2013;2.121</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.012<sup><xref rid="tfn3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Ki-67 expression</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.287&#x2013;4.433</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.006<sup><xref rid="tfn3-ol-0-0-7930" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3-ol-0-0-7930"><label>a</label><p>P&#x003C;0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by Cox regression analysis. TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; Sam68, Src-associated in mitosis of 68 kDa.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
