OL Oncology Letters 1792-1074 1792-1082 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ol.2018.8205 OL-0-0-8205 Articles Effects of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory factors, T lymphocyte subsets and expression of NF-κB in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients receiving radical surgery of colon carcinoma WangKun LiChengwen Department of Anesthesiology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China Correspondence to: Dr Chengwen Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, 6 Jiankang Road, Jining, Shandong 272011, P.R. China, E-mail: lichwen2008@126.com 05 2018 07 03 2018 15 5 7153 7157 14122017 16022018 Copyright: © Wang et al. 2018 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The effects of dexmedetomidine on inflammatory factors, T lymphocyte subsets and expression of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients receiving radical surgery of colon carcinoma were investigated. A total of 141 patients receiving radical surgery of colon carcinoma from January 2014 to April 2017 were divided into two groups randomly. The patients in the treatment group were given dexmedetomidine, while the patients in the control group were treated with saline. Results showed that there were no significant differences in preoperative levels of NF-κB, sICAM-1 and IL-8 between the two groups. However, the above three indexes of the groups were all significantly increased at 0.5 and 24 h after operation, and the results showed that the control group had a higher degree of increase (P<0.05). It was also found that the changes in levels of IL-6 and CRP in patients were the same as those of the above three indexes; in other words, the degree of the increase in the control group was significantly higher than that in the treatment group after operation. Moreover, it was found that there was little difference in the preoperative Ramsay score of patients between the two groups. The scores at 0.5 and 12 h after operation in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). It was also found that the intraoperative and postoperative dosages of fentanyl in the treatment group were significantly less than those in the control group (P<0.05). We can conclude that the application of dexmedetomidine during anesthesia in patients receiving radical operation of colon carcinoma has a better clinical treatment effect, which can reduce the secretion of inflammatory factors, decrease the inhibition of immunity and reduce the use of fentanyl.

 dexmedetomidine colon carcinoma inflammatory factors T lymphocyte subsets peripheral blood mononuclear cells Introduction

Patients receiving radical operation of colon carcinoma need anesthesia during the surgical treatment (1,2). At present, dexmedetomidine, as a new type of adrenergic receptor agonist, is increasingly widely used in the field of anesthesia (3–5). The drug has been commonly used as the preoperative sedative, regional anesthesia adjuvant and general anesthesia adjuvant (6,7). It is clinically found that the drug also has an anti-inflammatory effect (8–10). Therefore, 141 patients receiving radical operation of colon carcinoma in Jining No. 1 People's Hospital (Jining, China) from January 2014 to April 2017 were selected in this study, and dexmedetomidine anesthesia was induced, so as to explore the anti-inflammatory and immune effects of the sedative, and provide a more scientific clinical basis.

 Patients and methods <sec> <title>General data

A total of 141 patients receiving radical operation of colon carcinoma in Jining No. 1 People's Hospital (Shandong, China) from January 2014 to April 2017 were collected, including 69 cases in the control group and 72 cases in the treatment group. There were 33 males and 36 females in the control group, and 36 males and 36 females in the treatment group. In the control group, they were aged 34–67 years with an average age of 45.3±5.0 years, and in the treatment group, they were aged 35–69 years with an average age of 42.5±4.3 years. Patients in the two groups were all in I–II of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jining No. 1 People's Hospital. Signed written informed consents were obtained from all patients or their guardians before the study. Exclusion criteria: Patients with damage in heart, liver or kidney, or systemic immune system diseases.

 Methods

Before the operation, the patients were fasting for 12 h before anesthesia and general anesthesia was performed before the operation. The method of anesthesia induction is as follows: The patients were given intravenous injection of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1.0 µg/kg). During ventilation, end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2) was set at 35–45 mmHg and fentanyl was administered via veno-micropump target control with the infusion rate of 0.03–0.2 µg/(kg·min). The tidal volume of the ventilator was set at 8–10 ml/kg, with a frequency of 12–16 times/min, and PETCO2 of 35–45 mmHg. The infusion rate of fentanyl was controlled to adjust the depth of anesthesia. Intravenous injection of urapidil or ephedrine was selected according to the change in SBP value. Sevoflurane inhalation was discontinued following the completion of operation and fentanyl (0.5 µg/kg) was administered intravenously after operation for systemic analgesia. The patients in the treatment group were given pump infusion of dexmedetomidine [1 µg/kg over 10–15 min as a loading dose; then the pump flow rate was set as 1 µg/(kg·h)] before operation, while the patients in the control group received pump injection of the same amount of normal saline.

 Evaluation of the efficacy

Ramsay sedation score: Patients were scored before operation and at 0.5, 12 and 24 h after operation, respectively. Patients with irritability and restlessness: 1 point; patients who were cooperative and quiet: 2 points; patients with lethargy and obeying orders: 3 points, patients who could be awakened during sleep: 4 points; patients with slow reaction when being called: 5 points; patients who could not be awakened when being called: 6 points.

 Observational indexes

The levels of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, serum soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), interleukin-8 (IL-8), serum IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients in the two groups were observed during perioperative period. Besides, the levels of T lymphocyte subsets of patients in two groups were observed by flow cytometry. The dosages of fentanyl used during operation and after operation were recorded.

 Statistical analysis

Data were processed by SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Measurement data and counting data were expressed by mean ± standard deviation (SD) and n, respectively, and t-test and chi-square test were used for intergroup comparison. P<0.05 suggested that the difference was statistically significant.

 Results <sec> <title>Comparison of general data between two groups

The general data of patients in the two groups were compared: In the treatment group, the average age was 42.5±4.3 years, body weight was 52±3.5 kg, ASA grade was I–II, anesthesia time 109.2±7.4 min, operation time 98.7±4.3 min, and amount of bleeding was 59.2±3.2 ml; in the control group, the average age was 45.3±5.0 years, body weight 56±4.3 kg, ASA grade I–II, anesthesia time 110.5±7.4 min, operation time 99.3±4.8 min, and amount of bleeding was 58.8±3.0 ml. The anesthesia time and the amount of bleeding in the two groups were similar (Table I).

 Effects of NF-κB in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum sICAM-1 and IL-8 levels in the two groups

There were no significant differences in the preoperative levels of NF-κB, sICAM-1 and IL-8 in patients between the two groups. However, they were increased and then decreased at 0.5 and 24 h after operation; the contents of three indexes of patients in both groups were significantly increased at two time-points after operation, and the degree of the increase in control group was significantly higher than that of the treatment group (P<0.05), with statistical significance (Table II).

 Comparisons of serum IL-6, TNF-α and CRP levels in patients between two groups

In the treatment group, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α and CRP before treatment were 3.25±0.98, 16.27±2.21 pg/ml and 4.45±0.32 mg/l, respectively; the levels of IL-6, TNF-α and CRP at 0.5 h after operation were 70.56±3.21, 15.02±2.06 pg/ml and 5.78±0.19 mg/l, respectively; and the levels of the three indexes at 24 h after operation were 60.72±2.98, 19.72±2.34 pg/ml and 3.21±0.12 mg/l, respectively. In the control group, the levels of the three indexes before operation were 3.69±0.65, 16.83±3.01 pg/ml and 4.29±0.18 mg/l, respectively; the levels of the three indexes at 0.5 h after operation were 90.56±3.65, 16.75±2.10 pg/ml and 8.12±0.21 mg/l, respectively; and the levels of the three indexes at 24 h after operation were 67.97±3.98, 18.98±2.03 pg/ml and 4.54±0.32 mg/l, respectively. It was found that the levels of IL-6 in two groups were increased at 0.5 and 24 h after operation, and the levels of IL-6 in the control group were significantly higher than that in the treatment group. The postoperative level of CRP was higher than that before operation, and the postoperative level in the control group was higher than that in the treatment group (Table III).

 Comparison of Ramsay scores between two groups

The preoperative Ramsay scores of patients in the treatment group and the control group were 1.97±0.21 and 1.98±0.15 points, respectively. The Ramsay scores 0.5 h after operation of patients in two groups were 4.13±0.43 and 2.59±0.18 points, respectively. The Ramsay scores at 12 h after operation of patients in two groups were 2.34±0.17 and 1.99±0.10 points, respectively. The Ramsay scores at 24 h after operation of patients in two groups were 2.05±0.19 and 2.06±0.12 points, respectively. The results showed that the Ramsay scores of patients in the treatment group were higher than those in the control group at 0.5 and 12 h after operation, and the differences were significant between the two groups (Table IV).

 Changes in levels of T lymphocyte subsets in patients during perioperative period between two groups

The levels of T lymphocyte subsets had no difference between the two groups at the first time point. The CD3+T, CD4+T, CD4+T/CD8+T, Th1 and Th1/Th2 in two groups were lower at T2 and T3 than those at T0, and the Treg values at T2 and T3 were significantly higher than those at T0. It was also found that the indexes of CD3+T, CD4+T, CD4+T/CD8+T, Th1 and Th1/Th2 in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group, and the Treg value was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05) (Table V).

 Comparison of the dosages of fentanyl in patients between two groups

The fentanyl dosages during operation and after operation in the treatment group were 0.63±0.11 and 0.52±0.09 mg respectively, and the fentanyl dosages during operation and after operation in the control group were 0.98±0.21 and 0.99±0.19 mg respectively, suggesting that the fentanyl dosage whether during operation or after operation in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05) (Fig. 1).

 Discussion

Inflammation, as a physiological disease, often occurs in the body. When inflammation occurs in the body, it will lead to changes in blood vessels, cells and other tissues (11,12). Clinical studies have found that the use of anesthetics in the body can act on inflammatory factors, such as mononuclear macrophages, and also affect inflammatory mediators (13,14). The research on anti-inflammatory effect of all anesthetics is based on a variety of inflammatory factors. The most widely used inflammatory factors are IL-6, TNF-α and IL-8. IL-6 and IL-8 are produced by mononuclear macrophages in the body, while TNF-α is secreted by neutrophils. A variety of inflammatory factors can affect the neutrophil chemotaxis and induce allergic reactions, leading to chemotaxis of T cells, which can promote the immune response in the body to a certain extent (15,16).

NF-κB is a key nuclear transcription factor in the body and plays an important role in the immune and inflammation processes. When the body is stimulated by inflammatory factors, IκB, an inhibitor of NF-κB, will be degraded, leading to over-secretion of NF-κB in the body; the excessive NF-κB will be transferred into the nucleus, leading to gene expression (17).

ICAM-1 is widely used in antigen production and leukocyte infiltration process, and it is widely distributed in lymphocytes. As a kind of multifunctional adhesion molecule, it is also involved in the process of body immunity. T cell subsets have been clinically proven to be important indexes of immune disorders of the body, and Treg is a subset of T cells that can inhibit the immune response in cancer patients. Clinical studies have found that dexmedetomidine acts on the blue plaque in brain, which can reduce norepinephrine secretion, inhibit oxidative stress, and inhibit the occurrence of inflammation (18–20).

In this study the degree of the increase in the inflammatory factors at 0.5 and 24 h after operation in the treatment group was significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Patients in two groups had the same factor levels before operation, indicating that the dexmedetomidine anesthesia can significantly inhibit the secretion of inflammatory factors and inhibit the release of inflammatory mediators. Clinical studies have found that when dexmedetomidine takes effect, the patient's central nervous system receptors will be affected, and the norepinephrine will be inhibited, leading to less stress response in patients and decreased secretion of catecholamine in adrenergic receptor and glucocorticoid receptor in patients, which ultimately inhibits the production of inflammatory factors. In this study, it was also found that the sedation in the treatment group was better than that in the control group (P<0.05). Dexmedetomidine can act on the nerve center of the body to reduce the release of norepinephrine and increase the threshold of excitement.

In conclusion, the application of dexmedetomidine in patients receiving radical operation of colon carcinoma has a better clinical effect, which can reduce the production of inflammatory factors, decrease the inhibition of T lymphocyte subsets, and lower the impact on NF-κB in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with a higher clinical therapeutic value.

 Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

 Funding

No funding was received.

 Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

 Authors contributions

KW designed the study and prepared the manuscript. CL collected and analysed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jining No. 1 People's Hospital (Jining, China). Signed written informed consents were obtained from all patients or their guardians before the study.

 Consent for publication

Not applicable.

 Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 References WalkerSMGrafeMYakshTLIntrathecal clonidine in the neonatal rat: Dose-dependent analgesia and evaluation of spinal apoptosis and toxicityAnesth Analg115450460201210.1213/ANE.0b013e3182501a0922467896 OzcengizDUnlügençHGüneşYKaracaerFThe effect of dexmedetomidine on bispectral index monitoring in childrenMiddle East J Anaesthesiol21613618201223327035 BannisterCFBrosiusKKSiglJCMeyerBJSebelPSThe effect of bispectral index monitoring on anesthetic use and recovery in children anesthetized with sevoflurane in nitrous oxideAnesth Analg92877881200110.1097/00000539-200104000-0001511273918 LiHLSheSZYanYZhuSMEffect of dexmedetomidine on bispectral index and auditory evoked potential index during anesthesia with target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanylZhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban3984882010(In Chinese)20175241 IshibashiCHayashidaMSugasawaYYamaguchiKTomitaNKajiyamaYInadaEEffects of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and respiration in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection for cervical esophageal or pharyngeal cancerJ Anesth30628636201610.1007/s00540-016-2175-427125210 LinHFaraklasISampsonCSaffleJRCochranAUse of dexmedetomidine for sedation in critically ill mechanically ventilated pediatric burn patientsJ Burn Care Res3298103201110.1097/BCR.0b013e318203332d21088616 ZhaoXNRanJHBajracharyaARMaMYEffect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on median effective concentration of propofol for anesthesia induction: A randomized controlled trialEur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci2031343143201627460746 ValenzaGAkejuOPavoneKJCitiLHartnackKESampsonAPurdonPLBrownENBarbieriRInstantaneous monitoring of heart beat dynamics during anesthesia and sedationJ Comput Surg1118201410.1186/s40244-014-0013-2 WalkerSMHowardRFKeayKAFitzgeraldMDevelopmental age influences the effect of epidural dexmedetomidine on inflammatory hyperalgesia in rat pupsAnesthesiology10212261234200510.1097/00000542-200506000-0002415915037 DongWChenMHYangYHZhangXHuangMJYangXJWangHZThe effect of dexmedetomidine on expressions of inflammatory factors in patients with radical resection of gastric cancerEur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci2135103515201728829488 ChuNJArmstrongTDJaffeeEMNonviral oncogenic antigens and the inflammatory signals driving early cancer development as targets for cancer immunopreventionClin Cancer Res2115491557201510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-118625623216 SmitMAJaffeeEMLutzERCancer immunoprevention - the next frontierCancer Prev Res (Phila)710721080201410.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-017825245763 KostopanagiotouGSidiropoulouTPyrsopoulosNPrettoEAJrPandaziAMatsotaPArkadopoulosNSmyrniotisVTzakisAGAnesthetic and perioperative management of intestinal and multivisceral allograft recipient in nontransplant surgeryTranspl Int21415427200810.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00627.x18208418 NeskovićVPreoperative assesment of the immunocompromised patientActa Chir Iugosl58185192201110.2298/ACI1102185N21879670 RemottiHSubramanianSMartinezMKatoTMagidMSSmall-bowel allograft biopsies in the management of small-intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients: Histopathologic review and clinical correlationsArch Pathol Lab Med136761771201210.5858/arpa.2011-0596-RA22742549 YukiKSorianoSGShimaokaMSedative drug modulates T-cell and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 functionAnesth Analg112830838201110.1213/ANE.0b013e31820dcabb21385989 Alonso-AriasRMoro-GarcíaMAVidal-CastiñeiraJRSolano-JaurrietaJJSuárez-GarcíaFMCotoELópez-LarreaCIL-15 preferentially enhances functional properties and antigen-specific responses of CD4+CD28null compared to CD4+CD28+ T cellsAging Cell10844852201110.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00725.x21635686 CanMGulSBektasSHanciVAcikgozSEffects of dexmedetomidine or methylprednisolone on inflammatory responses in spinal cord injuryActa Anaesthesiol Scand5310681072200910.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02019.x19519725 FangBLiXQBiBTanWFLiuGZhangYMaHDexmedetomidine attenuates blood-spinal cord barrier disruption induced by spinal cord ischemia reperfusion injury in ratsCell Physiol Biochem36373383201510.1159/00043010725967975 BicerCEsmaogluAAkinABoyaciADexmedetomidine and meperidine prevent postanaesthetic shiveringEur J Anaesthesiol23149153200610.1017/S026502150500206116426470

Comparisons of the dosages of fentanyl in patients between two groups. *P<0.05, compared with treatment group.

Comparison of general data between two groups (mean ± SD).

Group Age (years) Body weight (kg) ASA grade Anesthesia time (min) Operation time (min) Amount of bleeding (ml)
Treatment group 42.5±4.3 52±3.5 I–II 109.2±7.4 98.7±4.3 59.2±3.2
Control group 45.3±5.0 56±4.3 I–II 110.5±7.4 99.3±4.8 58.8±3.0

Effects of NF-κB in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum sICAM-1 and IL-8 levels in two groups (mean ± SD).

Group Time NF-κB (U/l) sICAM-1 (mg/l) IL-8 (pg/ml)
Treatment group Preoperative 24.56±1.98 320.8±8.6 19.2±1.0
0.5 h after operation 33.79±2.65a 507.2±7.5a 45.7±2.7a
24 h after operation 28.31±2.51a 498.8±10.0a 24.5±1.9a
Control group Preoperative 25.06±2.48 334.3±6.9 19.8±2.8
0.5 h after operation 42.59±3.65a,b 588.5±8.6a,b 59.8±3.0a,b
24 h after operation 32.32±2.86a,b 543.1±9.5a,b 34.3±2.8a,b

Compared with that before operation, P<0.05

compared with that in treatment group, P<0.05.

Comparison of serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α and CRP in patients between two groups (mean ± SD).

Group Time IL-6 (pg/ml) TNF-α (pg/ml) CRP (mg/l)
Treatment group Preoperative 3.25±0.98 16.27±2.21 4.45±0.32
0.5 h after operation 70.56±3.21a 15.02±2.06 5.78±0.19a
24 h after operation 60.72±2.98a 19.72±2.34 4.21±0.12
Control group Preoperative 3.69±0.65 16.83±3.01 4.29±0.18
0.5 h after operation 90.56±3.65a,b 16.75±2.10 8.12±0.21a,b
24 h after operation 67.97±3.98a,b 18.98±2.03 4.54±0.32

Compared with that before operation, P<0.05

compared with that in treatment group, P<0.05.

Comparison of Ramsay scores between two groups (mean ± SD).

Group Case Before operation 0.5 h after operation 12 h after operation 24 h after operation
Treatment group 72 1.97±0.21 4.13±0.43 2.34±0.17 2.05±0.19
Control group 69 1.98±0.15 2.59±0.18a 1.99±0.10a 2.06±0.12

Compared with the treatment group, P<0.05.

Changes in levels of T lymphocyte subsets in patients during perioperative period between two groups (mean ± SD).

Group Time CD3+T (%) CD4+T (%) CD8+T (%) CD4+T/CD8+T Th1 (%) Th2 (%) Th1/Th2 Th17 (%) Treg (%)
Treatment group T0 61.9±8.6 45.7±6.9 14.5±2.4 2.9±1.0 29.9±3.7 2.8±1.0 16.9±4.6 2.5±0.8 3.3±1.1
T1 (6 hours) 58.3±8.5 45.0±7.2 15.6±4.2 2.6±0.9 28.9±5.3 2.7±0.9 15.6±4.3 2.3±0.9 3.0±1.0
T2 (1 day) 57.2±7.5a 44.3±6.9a 15.7±3.8 2.5±1.0a 27.9±4.8a 2.9±0.8 14.3±4.9a 2.4±1.2 3.6±1.2a
T3 (2 days) 58.4±8.2a 43.9±7.5a 15.9±4.0 2.7±1.2a 27.6±4.2a 2.9±0.9 14.3±5.2a 2.2±1.0 3.3±1.2a
T4 (3 days) 60.1±7.9 44.5±6.9 14.5±3.7 2.5±0.9 27.5±4.0 2.8±0.8 14.5±5.0 2.5±0.9 3.5±1.0
Control group T0 61.2±8.5 44.2±7.9 15.2±3.1 2.3±0.9 27.1±4.3 2.6±0.9 14.2±4.9 2.3±0.9 3.6±1.2
T1 (6 hours) 59.4±7.9 42.0±7.4 17.3±3.7 2.2±1.0 25.6±4.8 2.7±0.9 13.7±3.9 2.0±1.0 3.5±1.3
T2 (1 day) 56.2±9.6a,b 40.1±6.4a,b 17.8±4.1 1.9±0.8a,b 23.0±3.8a,b 2.2±1.0 11.5±2.9a,b 1.9±0.8 4.3±1.3a,b
T3 (2 days) 53.9±7.9a,b 40.2±6.3a,b 17.9±3.5 1.9±0.9a,b 23.7±3.6a,b 2.5±0.7 11.7±2.7a,b 2.2±0.9 4.2±1.3a,b
T4 (3 days) 60.9±8.5 44.2±7.5 14.3±2.8 2.3±1.0 25.7±6.0 2.7±0.9 13.5±3.0 2.1±0.9 3.9±1.2

Compared with that at T0, P<0.05

compared with the treatment group, P<0.05.