<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OL</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oncology Letters</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-1074</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1082</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2018.9346</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OL-0-0-9346</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy reduces tumor growth via Warburg effect inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer A549 &#x00D7;enografts</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Yangjun</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Mengjie</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Jun</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Weng</surname><given-names>Wanwen</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Teng</surname><given-names>Lisong</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af3-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">3</xref>
<xref rid="af4-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="aff">4</xref>
<xref rid="c1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ol-0-0-9346"><label>1</label>Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af2-ol-0-0-9346"><label>2</label>Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af3-ol-0-0-9346"><label>3</label>Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af4-ol-0-0-9346"><label>4</label>Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ol-0-0-9346"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Professor Lisong Teng, Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China, E-mail: <email>lsteng@zju.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn1-ol-0-0-9346"><label>&#x002A;</label><p>Contributed equally</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>11</month>
<year>2018</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2018</year></pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>5969</fpage>
<lpage>5977</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>08</month><year>2018</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Zhang et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy (125I-IBT) is an alternative and effective treatment option for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the Warburg effect is a determinant of tumor growth. The present study aimed to explore the influence of 125I-IBT on tumor growth and the Warburg effect, and the potential mechanisms underlying NSCLC progression. Mice with A549 cell xenografts were evenly divided into a control group without 125I-IBT, and three treatment groups receiving 125I-IBT with 20, 40 and 60 Gy. Tumor volume (TV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) micro-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and mean optical density (MOD) of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), c-Myc, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1; (HIF-1&#x03B1;) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) staining were compared among groups. Tumor inhibition rate (TIR), 18F-FDG uptake attenuation rate (FUAR) and expression suppression rate (ESR) were also calculated on day 14 and 28. The results demonstrated that the mean TV in the 60 and 40 Gy groups was smaller compared with the control TVs since days 14 and 16, respectively. The mean SUVmax value of the 60 Gy group at day 14, and all treatment group SUVmax values at day 28 were lower compared with the controls. In addition, the MOD of mTOR and GLUT1 was lower in the 60 Gy group, compared with the other groups, and c-Myc and HIF-1&#x03B1; values were lower in the 40 and 60 Gy groups, compared with the control and 20 Gy group (P&#x003C;0.05). SUVmax positively correlated to TV (day 14, r=0.711; day 28, r=0.586) and the MOD of c-Myc and GLUT1 (r=0.621 and 0.546, respectively; P&#x003C;0.01). Furthermore, dose dependent increases were observed for TIR, FUAR and ESR. In conclusion, 125I-IBT reduced tumor growth by inhibiting the Warburg effect, which may have resulted from downregulation of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression, particularly c-Myc and GLUT1, in NSCLC A549 &#x00D7;enografts.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>iodine-125 seed</kwd>
<kwd>brachytherapy</kwd>
<kwd>Warburg effect</kwd>
<kwd><sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose</kwd>
<kwd>micro-PET/CT</kwd>
<kwd>non-small cell lung cancer</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Lung cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Over 80&#x0025; of cases are histologically classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (<xref rid="b1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Surgery is generally the treatment of choice for early stage NSCLC. However, 30&#x2013;55&#x0025; of patients develop recurrence even following complete resection, and the mortality rate is high (<xref rid="b3-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). As early disease is typically asymptomatic, the majority of patients are diagnosed at a distant stage, resulting in extremely poor prognosis, even with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (<xref rid="b2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Recently, computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy (<sup>125</sup>I-IBT) has been employed to treat NSCLC at the inoperable advanced stage, and in cases with local recurrence or metastasis following surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, alone or in combination with other treatments (<xref rid="b3-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). It was demonstrated that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT significantly improves overall survival and local control, by maximizing the radiation dose delivered to the tumor, and minimizing radiation injury of the surrounding normal lung tissue. Certain preclinical studies have further suggested that increased G2/M arrest, increased apoptosis and enhanced bystander effect may serve key roles in the anti-proliferative effects induced by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT in NSCLC (<xref rid="b7-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b9-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). However, the association between <sup>125</sup>I-IBT and glucose metabolism in NSCLC remains unclear.</p>
<p>The Warburg effect, a hallmark for tumor cells, was discovered by Otto Warburg in 1924. It is well established that in contrast to normal cells, which predominantly rely on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to generate the energy required for cellular processes, the majority of tumor cells instead rely on aerobic glycolysis. The Warburg effect is a determinant of tumor cell proliferation (<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). The rate of glucose entry into tumor cells is at least 20&#x2013;30-fold higher than normal cells. This unique phenomenon is the basis for the use of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG), a radioactive glucose analog that is intensely accumulated by tumor cells (<xref rid="b11-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>). <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is widely used for initial diagnosis, disease staging, recurrence and metastasis detection, as well as for monitoring chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy response in lung cancer (<xref rid="b12-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b16-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>).</p>
<p>In recent years, several studies have investigated the Warburg effect in lung cancer progression, as well as for the development of targeted therapies (<xref rid="b17-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b19-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). It was suggested that Sad1 and UNC84 domain containing 2 (SUN2) protein may suppress lung cancer cell proliferation and migration by attenuating the Warburg effect, whereas pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), may promote lung cancer cell proliferation and migration, via the inverse mechanism. In addition, dichloroacetate, a metabolic agent, may partially revert the Warburg effect in tumor cells, increase X-ray sensitivity and inhibit the growth of lung cancer cells. Based on these previous reports, the present study aimed to investigate if and how the Warburg effect was involved in <sup>125</sup>I-IBT for NSCLC. Herein, it was hypothesized that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have suppressed tumor growth via Warburg effect inhibition in NSCLC. Alterations in tumor growth and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake were monitored using micro-PET/CT imaging. In addition, the relationships among these factors, the expression of glycolysis-associated molecules and the radiation dose were analyzed in NSCLC A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture and animal model</title>
<p>The A549 cell line was purchased from Shanghai Jianglin Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10&#x0025; fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin at 37&#x00B0;C in a 5&#x0025; CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere. Cells were trypsinized and harvested once 80&#x2013;90&#x0025; confluence was reached. Male BALB/c-nu mice (18&#x2013;20 g; 4&#x2013;6 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and allowed to acclimatize for 1 week in a specific pathogen-free room under controlled temperature and humidity prior to experimental initiation. Following this, ~0.2 ml A549 cell suspension (1&#x00D7;10<sup>7</sup> cells/1 ml RPMI-1640) was injected subcutaneously into the right armpits of the forelegs. After 4 weeks, mice with a xenograft diameter of ~10 mm were used for study.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Study design</title>
<p>A total of 24 prior mice were randomly divided into four groups (n=6 per group). The control group without <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation, and three treatment groups with a prescribed dose of 20, 40 and 60 Gy, via 1&#x2013;2 <sup>125</sup>I seed implantation with a radioactivity of 0.3&#x2013;0.6 mCi, respectively. The treatment period was 4 weeks. Tumor growth was monitored by determining the xenograft size every 2 days with a calliper. Before and 14, 28 days after receiving <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, micro-PET/CT imaging was performed to determine the baseline level and post-treatment alterations in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake. At the end of study, the mice were euthanized with dislocation of cervical vertebra after being anesthetized with 3&#x0025; isoflurane inhalation and all xenografts were histologically analyzed with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Interstitial brachytherapy</title>
<p><sup>125</sup>I seeds (model 6711; diameter, 0.8 mm; length, 4.5 mm; half-life, 59.6 days; half value thickness, 1.7 cm in tissue; main emission, 27.4&#x2013;31.4 Kev X-ray and 35.5 Kev &#x03B3;-ray) were provided by Seeds Biological Pharmacy, Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The <sup>125</sup>I seeds were preloaded into 18-gauge needles and subsequently implanted into the xenograft center. The radiation prescribed dose was planned based on the axial micro-CT images using a brachytherapy treatment planning system (Beijing Astro Technology, Beijing, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Tumor volume</title>
<p>Based on measurements of the short (a) and long (b) tumor diameters, tumor volume (TV) was calculated, according to the formula of TV=1/2 &#x00D7; a<sup>2</sup> &#x00D7; b. The TV and tumor inhibition rate (TIR) on day 14 and 28 were defined as TV<sub>14</sub>, TV<sub>28</sub>, TIR<sub>14</sub> and TIR<sub>28</sub>, respectively. TIR was calculated using the following equation: TIR=(mean of TV<sub>c</sub>-mean of TV<sub>t</sub>)/mean of TV<sub>c</sub> &#x00D7;100&#x0025;, where TV<sub>c</sub> was the control TV, and TV<sub>t</sub> was the treatment group TV.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Micro-PET/CT imaging</title>
<p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG was synthesized by the PET/CT center in our institution. Following an overnight fast, mice were injected with ~0.1 mCi <sup>18</sup>F-FDG via the tail vein. After 1 h, mice were anesthetized with 3&#x0025; isoflurane inhalation and placed in the prone position in the center of a Siemens Inveon combined micro-PET/CT scanner (Siemens Preclinical Solution USA, Inc., Knoxville, TN, USA). Micro-CT scans were performed with a 80 kV X-ray tube voltage, 500 &#x00B5;A current, 150 ms ec exposure time and 120 rotation steps. Micro-PET static acquisition was subsequently performed for 10 min and the data were processed using the ordered set expectation maximization algorithm for three dimensional PET reconstruction. Micro-PET/CT images were analyzed with an Inveon Research Workplace 4.1 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax; g/ml) of the xenograft was measured on day 0, 14 and 28 and referred to as SUVmax<sub>0</sub>, SUVmax<sub>14</sub>, SUVmax<sub>28</sub>, respectively. The <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake attenuation rate (FUAR) of the xenograft on day 14 and 28 was defined as FUAR<sub>14</sub> and FUAR<sub>28</sub>, respectively, using the following equation: FUAR=(mean SUVmax<sub>c</sub> value-mean SUVmax<sub>t</sub> value)/mean SUVmax<sub>c</sub> value &#x00D7;100&#x0025;, where SUVmax<sub>c</sub> was the control group SUVmax, and the SUVmax<sub>t</sub> was the treatment group SUVmax.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Histological evaluation</title>
<p>All xenografts were fixed in 10&#x0025; formalin overnight at 4&#x00B0;C and subsequently embedded in paraffin for histological section preparation (4 &#x00B5;m). The sections were deparaffinized and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for normal histological evaluation. IHC was also performed with antibodies to detect mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), c-Myc, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1; (HIF-1&#x03B1;) and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression, according to manufacturer&#x0027;s instructions. Primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) used were anti-mTOR ab2732 (diluted 1:200), anti-c-Myc ab32072 (diluted 1:100), anti-HIF-1&#x03B1; ab16066 (diluted 1:400) and anti-GLUT1 ab652 (diluted 1:200). In brief, sections were dewaxed and rehydrated prior to quenching in 3&#x0025; hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidase activity for 10 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by immersing the sections in EDTA/Tris solution (pH 9.0) in a microwave oven for 2&#x00D7;15 min. Sections were cooled at room temperature and washed in PBS for 3&#x00D7;10 min. Following this, sections were blocked in 5&#x0025; bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min and subsequently incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4&#x00B0;C and rewarmed for 30 min and washed in PBS for 3&#x00D7;10 min. Then sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies at 37&#x00B0;C for 45 min and washed in PBS for 3&#x00D7;10 min, followed by exposure to streptavidin-biotin complex (Ready-to-use SABC-POD kits: SA1021, goat anti-mouse IgG and SA1022, goat anti-rabbit IgG) for 45 min at 37&#x00B0;C and diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB AR1022; both Boster, Wuhan, China). Staining without primary antibodies was performed in parallel and served as a negative control. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in ethanol and xylene and mounted with cover slips using neutral balsam. Each section was assessed in three random microscopic fields (&#x00D7;200). The expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 was quantified by determining the mean optical density (MOD) using Image-Pro Plus software (version 6.0; Media Cybernetics, Inc. Maryland, USA). The expression suppression rate (ESR) of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 was defined as ESR<sub>mTOR</sub>, ESR<sub>c-Myc</sub>, ESR<sub>HIF-1&#x03B1;</sub> and ESR<sub>GLUT1</sub>, respectively, using the following equations: ESR=(mean MOD<sub>c</sub>-mean MOD<sub>t</sub>)/mean MOD<sub>c</sub> &#x00D7;100&#x0025;, where MOD<sub>c</sub> was the control group MOD, and MOD<sub>t</sub> was the MOD of the treatment groups.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The continuous variables were described as the mean &#x00B1; standard deviation. Significant differences were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance. If variances were equal, all pairwise comparisons between group means were performed with Fisher&#x0027;s Least Significant Difference test; if unequal, Dunnett&#x0027;s T3 test was used. Pearson&#x0027;s correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships among TV, SUVmax and the MOD of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1. P&#x003C;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title><sup>125</sup>I-IBT inhibits A549 &#x00D7;enograft growth</title>
<p>A549 &#x00D7;enograft growth over time following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT was presented in <xref rid="f1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>. Overall, the tumor gradually enlarged over time in all groups, although TV decreased as the radiation dose increased. The mean TV of the 60 Gy group (377.3&#x00B1;227.2 mm<sup>3</sup>) and 40 Gy group (410.7&#x00B1;174.42 mm<sup>3</sup>) was significantly reduced compared with controls since day 14 (691.0&#x00B1;258.5 mm<sup>3</sup>) and 16 (717.5&#x00B1;212.9 mm<sup>3</sup>), respectively (P&#x003C;0.05). However, no statistical differences were observed between the 20 Gy group and controls or among all treatment groups (P&#x003E;0.05). In addition, the TIR<sub>14</sub> of the 20, 40 and 60 Gy groups was 19.9, 39.8 and 45.4&#x0025;; and the TIR<sub>28</sub> were 18.0, 60.5 and 61.7&#x0025;, respectively. These data suggested that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have inhibited the growth of A549 &#x00D7;enografts, and inhibition was enhanced as the radiation dose increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><sup>125</sup>I-IBT reduces <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake in A549 &#x00D7;enografts</title>
<p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake within A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT was presented in <xref rid="f2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>. In general, compared with controls, the <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake of xenografts gradually reduced over time in <sup>125</sup>I-IBT treatment groups. Furthermore, the reduction in SUVmax was increased as the radiation dose increased (<xref rid="f3-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>). The mean of SUVmax<sub>14</sub> of the 60 Gy-group was significantly lower than the control group (0.91&#x00B1;0.13 g/ml vs. 1.08&#x00B1;0.08 g/ml; P&#x003C;0.05). The mean SUVmax<sub>28</sub> of all treatment groups was significantly lower than the control group (20 Gy, 0.94&#x00B1;0.19 g/ml; 40 Gy, 0.93&#x00B1;0.08 g/ml; 60 Gy, 0.79&#x00B1;0.16 g/ml vs. control group, 1.15&#x00B1;0.22 g/ml; P&#x003C;0.05), although there were no significant differences among treatment groups on day 14 and 28 (P&#x003E;0.05). Furthermore, the FUAR<sub>14</sub> of the 20, 40 and 60 Gy groups was 6.5, 8.3 and 15.7&#x0025;, and the FUAR<sub>28</sub> of the 20, 40 and 60 Gy groups was 18.3, 19.1 and 31.3&#x0025;, respectively. These data suggested that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have reduced <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake within A549 &#x00D7;enografts, and this effect was more marked as the radiation dose increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title><sup>125</sup>I-IBT suppresses mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression in A549 &#x00D7;enografts</title>
<p>The IHC staining patterns of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT were presented in <xref rid="f4-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>. In tumor cells, mTOR, c-Myc and HIF-1&#x03B1; were expressed in the nucleus and cytoplasm, whereas GLUT1 was predominantly expressed in the cytomembrane and cytoplasm. Overall, the expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in xenografts was gradually downregulated as the radiation dose increased in the <sup>125</sup>I-IBT treatment groups, compared with the controls (<xref rid="f5-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5</xref>). The MOD of mTOR staining in the 60 Gy-group (0.0092&#x00B1;0.0062) was markedly decreased compared with the other groups (control, 0.0198&#x00B1;0.0053; 20 Gy, 0.0191&#x00B1;0.0096 and 40 Gy, 0.0194&#x00B1;0.0062; P&#x003C;0.05). In addition, the MOD of c-Myc staining was significantly lower in the 40 (0.0025&#x00B1;0.0010) and 60 Gy (0.0006&#x00B1;0.0006) treatment groups, compared with the other groups (control, 0.0077&#x00B1;0.0020 and 20 Gy, 0.0055&#x00B1;0.0029; P&#x003C;0.01). Furthermore, the MOD of HIF-1&#x03B1; staining in the 40 (0.0024&#x00B1;0.0021) and 60 Gy (0.0018&#x00B1;0.0006) treatment groups was significantly than that of the control group (0.0070&#x00B1;0.0058; P&#x003C;0.05). Finally, the MOD of GLUT1 staining in the 60 Gy (0.0024&#x00B1;0.0025) group was significantly decreased compared with the other (control, 0.0150&#x00B1;0.0043; 20 Gy, 0.0139&#x00B1;0.0046; 40 Gy, 0.0130&#x00B1;0.0043; P&#x003C;0.01). However, there were no significant differences between 20 Gy group and the control for mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; or GLUT1 expression in A549 &#x00D7;enografts (P&#x003E;0.05). Additionally, the ESR<sub>mTOR</sub>, in the 20, 40 and 60 Gy groups was 4.0, 2.5 and 53.8&#x0025;, respectively; the ESR<sub>c-Myc</sub> was 28.6, 67.5 and 92.2&#x0025;, respectively; the ESR<sub>HIF-1&#x03B1;</sub> was 51.4, 65.7 and 74.3&#x0025;, respectively; and the ESR<sub>GLUT1</sub> was 7.3, 13.3 and 84.0&#x0025;, respectively. These data suggested that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have suppressed the expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in A549 &#x00D7;enografts, and the suppression effect was increased as the radiation dose increased.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Relationships among tumor growth, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake and expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1</title>
<p>The correlations among tumor growth, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake and expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 were presented in <xref rid="f6-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6</xref>. There was a positive correlation between TV<sub>14</sub> and SUVmax<sub>14</sub> (r=0.711), TV<sub>28</sub> and SUVmax<sub>14</sub> (r=0.682) and TV<sub>28</sub> and SUVmax<sub>28</sub> (r=0.586), respectively (P&#x003C;0.01). In addition, SUVmax<sub>28</sub> positively correlated to the MOD of c-Myc (r=0.621) and GLUT1 (r=0.546), respectively (P&#x003C;0.01). However, the MOD of mTOR (r=0.243) and HIF-1&#x03B1; (r=0.029) had no significant correlation with SUVmax<sub>28</sub> (P&#x003E;0.05). Furthermore, the MOD of mTOR, c-Myc and GLUT1 had a significant correlation with each other (P&#x003C;0.05; <xref rid="tI-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, it was postulated that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have suppressed NSCLC tumor growth by inhibiting the Warburg effect. Tumor growth and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake was monitored in NSCLC A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT with a radiation dose of 20, 40 or 60 Gy, and the relationships among them were also evaluated. It was demonstrated that both the TV and SUVmax of all treatment groups were decreased compared with controls following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, and these reductions were more marked as the time and radiation dose increased, which was consistent with results obtained in previous studies of pancreatic carcinoma xenografts (<xref rid="b20-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b21-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). In addition, the TIR and FUAR increased more or less as the radiation dose increased, and TV positively correlated to SUVmax on day 14 and 28. On the basis of these results, it can be inferred that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have reduced tumor growth by inhibiting the Warburg effect in NSCLC, and this inhibition increased in a dose-dependent manner more or less. Notably, it was revealed that SUVmax<sub>14</sub> was positively correlated with TV<sub>28</sub> (P&#x003C;0.05). This suggested that interim <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT may be a promising strategy to predict the anti-tumor efficacy of <sup>125</sup>I-IBT in NSCLC in the early stages. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is currently used to predict chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy efficacy in lung cancer (<xref rid="b16-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>), as well as other malignancies (<xref rid="b22-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>,<xref rid="b23-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>).</p>
<p>The Warburg effect is considered to involve multiple intricate mechanisms, including tumor microenvironment support, HIF stabilization, oncogene activation, tumor suppressor gene loss, cancer cell mitochondrial dysfunction, nuclear DNA mutations, epigenetic modifications, microRNA regulation, glutamine metabolism and post-translational modifications (<xref rid="b24-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>). HIF-1, a heterodimeric transcription factor consisting of &#x03B1; and &#x03B2; subunits, is known to contribute to the adaptability of tumor cells to hypoxic conditions. It may increase the efficacy of the glycolytic pathway by upregulating the expression of several GLUTs and several other genes linked to aerobic glycolysis (<xref rid="b25-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). For example, GLUT1 is ubiquitously expressed, but overexpressed in tumor cells and therefore increases the uptake of glucose. HIF regulation is predominantly dependent on the HIF-1&#x03B1; subunit, that has a short half-life under normoxic conditions due to proteasomal degradation (<xref rid="b24-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>,<xref rid="b26-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>,<xref rid="b27-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) and the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MAPKK)/extracellular regulated protein kinase (ERK) pathways are the major signaling pathways downstream from growth factor-bound receptor tyrosine kinases, which are linked to both growth control and glucose metabolism in tumor cells (<xref rid="b28-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>,<xref rid="b29-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). mTOR, a serine/threonine kinase, is an important downstream effector of AKT that stimulates the synthesis of HIF-1&#x03B1; under normoxic conditions, further enhancing the expression of GLUT1 and glycolytic enzymes, including lactate dehydrogenase B and pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) (<xref rid="b10-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b24-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>,<xref rid="b30-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). The suppression of mTOR expression reduces glucose uptake in tumor cells (<xref rid="b31-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). Furthermore, activated ERK induces the expression of MYC oncogene, which encodes a transcription factor c-Myc that is known to be aberrantly overexpressed in more than half of all human cancers (<xref rid="b32-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). Similar to HIF-1, c-Myc activates GLUT1 and several glycolytic genes, resulting in increased glucose influx and higher glycolytic rates and contributes to the Warburg effect (<xref rid="b33-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). In addition, activated c-Myc may work together with HIF-1 in glycolysis and OXPHOS regulation. Both HIF and c-Myc activate hexokinase 2 (HK2) and PDK1, leading to increased glycolytic rates and conversion of glucose to lactate (<xref rid="b27-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, alterations in mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression was analyzed by IHC techniques, and the relationship among them was determined. The findings revealed that the xenograft expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 decreased as the radiation dose increased, with the largest decrease observed in the 60 Gy group, compared with the controls. Furthermore, the ESR<sub>mTOR</sub>, ESR<sub>c-Myc</sub>, ESR<sub>HIF-1&#x03B1;</sub> and ESR<sub>GLUT1</sub> was dose-dependently increased, and the MOD of mTOR, c-Myc and GLUT1 were significantly correlated with each other. These findings indicated that the Warburg effect was inhibited by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, which may have resulted from mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 downregulation in NSCLC A549 &#x00D7;enografts.</p>
<p>Although the downregulation of the above molecules by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT has not been explicitly defined in the present study, possible involvement of AKT and ERK-mediated signaling pathways may be suggested in accordance with a previous report demonstrating that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may downregulate epidermal growth factor receptor, inhibiting AKT activation in colorectal tumor cells (<xref rid="b34-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>). <sup>125</sup>I-IBT has also been demonstrated to suppress vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression, and consequently inhibit ERK activation in nasopharyngeal tumor cells (<xref rid="b35-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). It is plausible that AKT and ERK inactivation may have reduced the expression of mTOR and c-Myc, resulting in the downregulation of HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression in the present study. In addition, Cron <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b36-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>) reported that <sup>125</sup>I seeds may significantly increase oxygen partial pressure within 24 h and even on day 3. Furthermore, it may elevate blood perfusion from day 3, in 2&#x2013;4 mm of the surrounding liver tumor region (<xref rid="b36-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). As a result, the improvement of the tumor hypoxic microenvironment by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have also partially reduced the expression and/or accelerated the degradation of HIF-1&#x03B1;. However, Hu <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b37-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>) demonstrated that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT increases mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and consequently upregulates the expression of HIF-1&#x03B1; in human colorectal cancer cells (<xref rid="b37-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>). Therefore, the downregulation of HIF-1&#x03B1; by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have been a synthetic action of above factors in NSCLC.</p>
<p>In addition, the correlation analysis between glucose metabolism and the expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in the present study revealed that the SUVmax<sub>28</sub> positively correlated with the MOD of c-Myc (r=0.621) and GLUT1 (r=0.546). This suggested that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake may depend upon the overexpression of c-Myc and GLUT1 in xenografts, particularly c-Myc. GLUT1 is the major glucose transporter expressed in NSCLC. Although its overexpression is considered to be linked to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake within tumors, it is unlikely that this is the sole or rate-limiting step in this process (<xref rid="b38-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). The role of GLUT1 remains controversial in NSCLC; certain studies have reported a significant correlation (<xref rid="b39-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>,<xref rid="b40-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>), whereas others have detected no correlation (<xref rid="b41-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>,<xref rid="b42-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>). This may be attributed to the fact that <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake involves tumor blood flow and tracer delivery rate, in addition to expression of GLUT1. Once <sup>18</sup>F-FDG enters tumor cells, hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) activity determines how much phosphorylated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG is trapped in cells (<xref rid="b38-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). c-Myc, as a central regulator of cell growth and proliferation (<xref rid="b43-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">43</xref>), targets genes involved in glucose transport, glycolysis, glutaminolysis and fatty acid synthesis (<xref rid="b44-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>). c-Myc activates GLUT1, as well as HK2 (<xref rid="b27-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>) and G6Pase (<xref rid="b45-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">45</xref>), leading to increased uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. Downregulation of c-Myc and GLUT1 suppresses the glycolytic pathway and glycolytic enzyme activity, leading to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake inhibition (<xref rid="b46-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">46</xref>).</p>
<p>However, it was noted that in the present study, no statistical differences between TV, SUVmax<sub>14</sub> and SUVmax<sub>28</sub> were observed among the treatment groups, or between the TV and the MOD of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in the 20 Gy and control group. This may have been due to the short investigation duration of 28 days, as <sup>125</sup>I-IBT is typically delivered over &#x003E;180 days (<xref rid="b21-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). Additionally, 60 Gy is a relatively low radiation dose, considering that the clinically effective dose is typically 100&#x2013;160 Gy (<xref rid="b3-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b6-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). Furthermore, there were no significant correlations between HIF-1&#x03B1; expression and the other detected proteins, or between the SUVmax<sub>28</sub> and the MOD of mTOR and HIF-1&#x03B1; (P&#x003E;0.05). This may be attributed in part to the complex, multifactorial regulation of HIF-1&#x03B1; as detailed above. In addition, it suggested that the AKT/mTOR pathway may have less influence on the Warburg effect in NSCLC, compared with the ERK/c-Myc pathway.</p>
<p>Certain limitations of the present study should be considered. First, other key molecules associated with glycolysis were not examined, such as PKM2 and HK2. Second, the expression of glycolysis-associated molecules was only evaluated using IHC rather than via western blotting and/or reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays for transcriptional and translational expression analyses, respectively. Third, A549 cells harbor the mutant K-ras gene, and the Ras/Raf/ERK signaling pathway is critical for tumor proliferation. Therefore, multiple NSCLC cells, including those with the wild-type K-ras gene, should be used to confirm the results of the present study.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the present study suggested that <sup>125</sup>I-IBT may have reduced tumor growth via Warburg effect inhibition, and this inhibitory effect increased as the radiation dose increased. Warburg effect inhibition may have resulted from mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression downregulation, particularly c-Myc and GLUT1, in NSCLC A549 &#x00D7;enografts. Further research is required to clearly delineate the exact mechanisms underlying Warburg effect inhibition by <sup>125</sup>I-IBT in NSCLC.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The authors would like to thank Mr. Jiong Yu for the cell culture assistance, Mr. Li Jiang for helping establishing the animal model and Mr. Hui Chen for assistance in animal imaging.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The present study was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant no. LY15H180007) and Zhejiang Province Medical Health Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 2015KYB153, 2016KYB099 and 2017KY061).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; contributions</title>
<p>JZ established animal models, performed animal imaging and drafted the manuscript. YZ was responsible for cell culture and participated in preparation of animal model and imaging. MD, JY and WW participated in the iodine-125 seed implantation and immunohistochemistry. LT conceived and designed the study, performed the statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title>
<p>The animals used in the present study received humane care in compliance with the Guideline to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals established by the Medical Ethical Committee on animal experiments of the Zhejiang University.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient consent for publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<glossary>
<def-list>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-item><term>NSCLC</term><def><p>non-small cell lung cancer</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term><sup>125</sup>I-IBT</term><def><p>iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>OXPHOS</term><def><p>oxidative phosphorylation</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PET/CT</term><def><p>positron emission tomography/computed tomography</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term><sup>18</sup>F-FDG</term><def><p><sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PDK1</term><def><p>pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TV</term><def><p>tumor volume</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TIR</term><def><p>tumor inhibition rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>SUVmax</term><def><p>maximum standardized uptake value</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>FUAR</term><def><p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake attenuation rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>IHC</term><def><p>immunohistochemistry</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>mTOR</term><def><p>mammalian target of rapamycin</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HIF-1&#x03B1;</term><def><p>hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1;</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>GLUT1</term><def><p>glucose transporter 1</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>MOD</term><def><p>mean optical density</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ESR</term><def><p>expression suppression rate</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PI3K</term><def><p>phosphoinositide 3-kinase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>AKT</term><def><p>protein kinase B</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>MAPKK</term><def><p>mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ERK</term><def><p>extracellular regulated protein kinase</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PKM2</term><def><p>pyruvate kinase M2</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HK2</term><def><p>hexokinase 2</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>ROS</term><def><p>reactive oxygen species</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>G6Pase</term><def><p>glucose-6-phosphatase</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ol-0-0-9346"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torre</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Siegel</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferlay</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lortet-Tieulent</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jemal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Global cancer statistics, 2012</article-title><source>CA Cancer J Clin</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25651787</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ol-0-0-9346"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Siegel</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Mariotto</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Rowland</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Stein</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Alteri</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Jemal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016</article-title><source>CA Cancer J Clin</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>289</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21349</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27253694</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ol-0-0-9346"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huo</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Huo</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Chai</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effectiveness and safety of CT-guided (125)I seed brachytherapy for postoperative locoregional recurrence in patients with non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Brachytherapy</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>370</fpage><lpage>380</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brachy.2016.02.001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26944267</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ol-0-0-9346"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Guan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Iodine-125 brachytherapy improved overall survival of patients with inoperable stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer versus the conventional radiotherapy</article-title><source>Med Oncol</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>395</fpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12032-014-0395-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428394</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ol-0-0-9346"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Combination of Iodine-125 brachytherapy and chemotherapy for locally recurrent stage III non-small cell lung cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>656</fpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12885-015-1657-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26445227</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ol-0-0-9346"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Dan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Repeated iodine-125 seed implantations combined with external beam radiotherapy for the treatment of locally recurrent or metastatic stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study</article-title><source>Radiat Oncol</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>119</fpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13014-016-0688-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27623620</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ol-0-0-9346"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>WY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bystander effects induced by continuous low-dose-rate 125I seeds potentiate the killing action of irradiation on human lung cancer cells in vitro</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>1560</fpage><lpage>1566</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19028278</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ol-0-0-9346"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biological effects of (125)i seeds radiation on A549 lung cancer cells: G2/M arrest and enhanced cell death</article-title><source>Cancer Invest</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/07357907.2014.905585</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24745612</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ol-0-0-9346"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Teng</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A comparison of the biological effects of 125I seeds continuous low-dose-rate radiation and 60Co high-dose-rate gamma radiation on non-small cell lung cancer cells</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>e133728</fpage><year>2015</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ol-0-0-9346"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vander Heiden</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantley</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>324</volume><fpage>1029</fpage><lpage>1033</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1160809</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19460998</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ol-0-0-9346"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ganapathy</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Thangaraju</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Nutrient transporters in cancer: Relevance to Warburg hypothesis and beyond</article-title><source>Pharmacol Ther</source><volume>121</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.09.005</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18992769</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ol-0-0-9346"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>e146195</fpage><year>2016</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ol-0-0-9346"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madsen</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name><name><surname>Holdgaard</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Christensen</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>H&#x00F8;ilund-Carlsen</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical utility of F-18 FDG PET-CT in the initial evaluation of lung cancer</article-title><source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>2084</fpage><lpage>2097</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-016-3407-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27164899</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ol-0-0-9346"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruilong</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Daohai</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiaohong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chunjie</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>Nucl Med Commun</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MNM.0000000000000605</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27741214</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ol-0-0-9346"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheikhbahaei</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mena</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Yanamadala</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Solnes</surname><given-names>LB</given-names></name><name><surname>Wachsmann</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Subramaniam</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The value of FDG PET/CT in treatment response assessment, follow-up, and surveillance of lung cancer</article-title><source>AJR Am J Roentgenol</source><volume>208</volume><fpage>420</fpage><lpage>433</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2214/AJR.16.16532</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27726427</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ol-0-0-9346"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cremonesi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gilardi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrari</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Piperno</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Travaini</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Timmerman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Botta</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Baroni</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Grana</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ronchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Role of interim <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. A systematic review</article-title><source>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>1915</fpage><lpage>1927</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00259-017-3762-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28681192</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ol-0-0-9346"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Chin-Sinex</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>DeLuca</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Pomerening</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherer</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Watkins</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Foley</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jesseph</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mendonca</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Dichloroacetate alters Warburg metabolism, inhibits cell growth, and increases the X-ray sensitivity of human A549 and H1299 NSC lung cancer cells</article-title><source>Free Radic Biol Med</source><volume>89</volume><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>273</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.08.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26393423</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ol-0-0-9346"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>XB</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>SUN2 exerts tumor suppressor functions by suppressing the Warburg effect in lung cancer</article-title><source>Sci Rep</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>17940</fpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep17940</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26658802</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ol-0-0-9346"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>PDK1 promotes tumor cell proliferation and migration by enhancing the Warburg effect in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Oncol Rep</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>200</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/or.2016.5253</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27878287</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ol-0-0-9346"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>JX</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>ZD</given-names></name><name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name><name><surname>Pan</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao-shen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Continuous and low-energy 125I seed irradiation changes DNA methyltransferases expression patterns and inhibits pancreatic cancer tumor growth</article-title><source>J Exp Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>35</fpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1756-9966-30-35</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21457568</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ol-0-0-9346"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jian</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhongmin</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Kemin</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Yunfeng</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Gang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>MicroPET-CT evaluation of interstitial brachytherapy in pancreatic carcinoma xenografts</article-title><source>Acta Radiol</source><volume>54</volume><fpage>800</fpage><lpage>804</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0284185113484017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23612430</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ol-0-0-9346"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subocz</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ha&#x0142;ka</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Dziuk</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma</article-title><source>Contemp Oncol (Pozn)</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>104</fpage><lpage>114</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28947879</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ol-0-0-9346"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cremonesi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Garibaldi</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Timmerman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrari</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ronchi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Grana</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Travaini</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gilardi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Starzynska</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciardo</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Interim <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT during chemo-radiotherapy in the management of oesophageal cancer patients. A systematic review</article-title><source>Radiother Oncol</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.022</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29029833</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ol-0-0-9346"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Upadhyay</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Samal</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kandpal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>OV</given-names></name><name><surname>Vivekanandan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Warburg effect: Insights from the past decade</article-title><source>Pharmacol Ther</source><volume>137</volume><fpage>318</fpage><lpage>330</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.11.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23159371</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ol-0-0-9346"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thorens</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Mueckler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Glucose transporters in the 21st Century</article-title><source>Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab</source><volume>298</volume><fpage>E141</fpage><lpage>E145</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpendo.00712.2009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20009031</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ol-0-0-9346"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Forbes</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation by aerobic glycolysis implicates the Warburg effect in carcinogenesis</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>277</volume><fpage>23111</fpage><lpage>23115</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M202487200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11943784</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ol-0-0-9346"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Warburg effect: Evolving interpretations of an established concept</article-title><source>Free Radic Biol Med</source><volume>79</volume><fpage>253</fpage><lpage>263</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.08.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25277420</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ol-0-0-9346"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Links between metabolism and cancer</article-title><source>Genes Dev</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>877</fpage><lpage>890</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.189365.112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22549953</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ol-0-0-9346"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Walton</surname><given-names>ZE</given-names></name><name><surname>Altman</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Stine</surname><given-names>ZE</given-names></name><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>MYC and metabolism on the path to cancer</article-title><source>Semin Cell Dev Biol</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26277543</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ol-0-0-9346"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makinoshima</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Takita</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Saruwatari</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Umemura</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Obata</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishii</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsumoto</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugiyama</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Ochiai</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Signaling through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis is responsible for aerobic glycolysis mediated by glucose transporter in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>290</volume><fpage>17495</fpage><lpage>17504</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M115.660498</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26023239</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ol-0-0-9346"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toschi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gadir</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Yellen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Drain</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Foster</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Phospholipase D-mTOR requirement for the Warburg effect in human cancer cells</article-title><source>Cancer Lett</source><volume>299</volume><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.canlet.2010.08.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20805015</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ol-0-0-9346"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>MYC on the path to cancer</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>149</volume><fpage>22</fpage><lpage>35</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22464321</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-ol-0-0-9346"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Yustein</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The interplay between MYC and HIF in cancer</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc2274</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18046334</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-ol-0-0-9346"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Qu</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Combined effects of C225 and 125-iodine seed radiation on colorectal cancer cells</article-title><source>Radiat Oncol</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>219</fpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1748-717X-8-219</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24053278</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-ol-0-0-9346"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hou</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radioactive <sup>125</sup>I seed inhibits the cell growth, migration, and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by triggering DNA damage and inactivating VEGF-A/ERK signaling</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>e74038</fpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0074038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24040157</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-ol-0-0-9346"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cron</surname><given-names>GO</given-names></name><name><surname>Beghein</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Crokart</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Chav&#x00E9;e</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernard</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vynckier</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Scalliet</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallez</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Changes in the tumor microenvironment during low-dose-rate permanent seed implantation iodine-125 brachytherapy</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>63</volume><fpage>1245</fpage><lpage>1251</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.07.971</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16253779</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-ol-0-0-9346"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The protective roles of ROS-mediated mitophagy on <sup>125</sup>I seeds radiation induced cell death in HCT116 cells</article-title><source>Oxid Med Cell Longev</source><volume>2016</volume><fpage>9460462</fpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2016/9460462</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28119765</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-ol-0-0-9346"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Leung</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kison</surname><given-names>PV</given-names></name><name><surname>Zasadny</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Flint</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wahl</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Glucose transporters and FDG uptake in untreated primary human non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>J Nucl Med</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>556</fpage><lpage>565</lpage><year>1999</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10210213</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-ol-0-0-9346"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Baardwijk</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dooms</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>van Suylen</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Verbeken</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Hochstenbag</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Dehing-Oberije</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Rupa</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Pastorekova</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Stroobants</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Buell</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The maximum uptake of (18)F-deoxyglucose on positron emission tomography scan correlates with survival, hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha and GLUT-1 in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Eur J Cancer</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>1392</fpage><lpage>1398</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17512190</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-ol-0-0-9346"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suzawa</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Qiao</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Uchida</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Takao</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamada</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeda</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Murashima</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Assessment of factors influencing FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer on PET/CT by investigating histological differences in expression of glucose transporters 1 and 3 and tumour size</article-title><source>Lung Cancer</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>191</fpage><lpage>198</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.08.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20884076</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-ol-0-0-9346"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chung</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake with glucose transporter-1 expression and proliferation rate in human glioma and non-small-cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Nucl Med Commun</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00006231-200401000-00003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15061260</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-ol-0-0-9346"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Geus-Oei</surname><given-names>LF</given-names></name><name><surname>van Krieken</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Aliredjo</surname><given-names>RP</given-names></name><name><surname>Krabbe</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name><name><surname>Frielink</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Verhagen</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Boerman</surname><given-names>OC</given-names></name><name><surname>Oyen</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Biological correlates of FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Lung Cancer</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>87</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.08.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17046099</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b43-ol-0-0-9346"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dang</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Rethinking the Warburg effect with Myc micromanaging glutamine metabolism</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>70</volume><fpage>859</fpage><lpage>862</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3556</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20086171</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b44-ol-0-0-9346"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morrish</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Isern</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadilek</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeffrey</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hockenbery</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>c-Myc activates multiple metabolic networks to generate substrates for cell-cycle entry</article-title><source>Oncogene</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>2485</fpage><lpage>2491</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/onc.2009.112</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19448666</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b45-ol-0-0-9346"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collier</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Doan</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name><name><surname>Daniels</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Schurr</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Kolls</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>c-Myc is required for the glucose-mediated induction of metabolic enzyme genes</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>6588</fpage><lpage>6595</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M208011200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12480946</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b46-ol-0-0-9346"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broecker-Preuss</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Becher-Boveleth</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Bockisch</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>D&#x00FC;hrsen</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>M&#x00FC;ller</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Regulation of glucose uptake in lymphoma cell lines by c-MYC- and PI3K-dependent signaling pathways and impact of glycolytic pathways on cell viability</article-title><source>J Transl Med</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>158</fpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12967-017-1258-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28724379</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Tumor growth curve of A549 &#x00D7;enografts following the administration of <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. Tumor volume gradually enlarged over time in all groups, although growth was reduced as the radiation dose increased. <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g00.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG micro-PET/CT imaging in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following the administration of <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. The <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake generally decreased over time within treatment group tumors, compared with the control group. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose; micro-PET/CT, micro-positron emission tomography/computed tomography; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g01.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following the administration of <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. The maximum standardized uptake value gradually reduced over time in the treatment groups compared with the control. Reduction was more marked as the radiation dose increased. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 vs. controls. <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g02.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption><p>Immunohistochemical staining in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 expression was downregulated in the treatment groups compared with the controls. Magnification, &#x00D7;200. mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; HIF-1&#x03B1;, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1;; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g03.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 5.</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 staining in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. The mean optical densities of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 gradually decreased as the radiation dose increased in treatment groups, compared with the controls. &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01 vs. controls; <sup>&#x25B2;</sup>P&#x003C;0.05, <sup>&#x25B2;&#x25B2;</sup>P&#x003C;0.01 vs. 20 Gy group; <sup>&#x0394;</sup>P&#x003C;0.05, <sup>&#x0394;&#x0394;</sup>P&#x003C;0.01 vs. 40 Gy group. mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; HIF-1&#x03B1;, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1;; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g04.jpg"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Figure 6.</label>
<caption><p>Relationships among tumor growth, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake and expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in A549 &#x00D7;enografts following <sup>125</sup>I-IBT. (A) TV positively correlated to SUVmax on day 14 (r=0.711; P&#x003C;0.01) and day 28 (r=0.586; P&#x003C;0.01). TV on day 28 also correlated to SUVmax on day 14 (r=0.682; P&#x003C;0.01). (B) SUVmax positively correlated with the mean optical densities of c-Myc (r=0.621) and GLUT1 (r=0.546) on day 28, respectively (P&#x003C;0.01). TV, tumor volume; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; HIF-1&#x03B1;, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1;; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ol-16-05-5969-g05.jpg"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ol-0-0-9346" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption><p>Associations among expression of mTOR, c-Myc, HIF-1&#x03B1; and GLUT1 in A549 &#x00D7;enograft after <sup>125</sup>I-IBT.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Protein name</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">mTOR, correlation coefficient (P-value)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">c-Myc, correlation coefficient (P-value)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">HIF-1&#x03B1;, correlation coefficient (P-value)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">c-Myc</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.500<sup><xref rid="tfn1-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup> (0.013)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">HIF-1&#x03B1;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2212;0.003 (0.988)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.365 (0.079)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">GLUT1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.526<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup> (0.008)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.614<sup><xref rid="tfn2-ol-0-0-9346" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup> (0.001)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.264 (0.212)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-ol-0-0-9346"><label>a</label><p>P&#x003C;0.05</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2-ol-0-0-9346"><label>b</label><p>P&#x003C;0.01. mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; HIF-1&#x03B1;, hypoxia inducible factor-1&#x03B1;; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; <sup>125</sup>I-IBT, iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
