OL Oncology Letters 1792-1074 1792-1082 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ol.2014.2585 ol-08-06-2795 Articles Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis JIANGLING-LING1 RUANLI-WEI2 Department of Neurology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215002, P.R. China Department of General Surgery (Breast and Thyroid Surgery), Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, P.R. China Correspondence to: Dr Li-Wei Ruan, Department of General Surgery (Breast and Thyroid Surgery), Shaoxing People’s Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, 568 Zhongxing North Road, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, P.R. China, E-mail: Liwei_Ruan@126.com 12 2014 02 10 2014 8 6 2795 2799 13 02 2014 11 09 2014 Copyright © 2014, Spandidos Publications 2014 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.

Epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the association between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms, rs3761549 and rs3761548, and the risk of cancer. However, the results from these studies have been controversial. In order to obtain a more precise conclusion of this association, the present meta-analysis was performed. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values were used to assess any correlations between the data. Overall, the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms of the FOXP3 gene were not associated with the cancer risk in an Asian population. In the subgroup analyses based on cancer type, no significant associations were identified between these two polymorphisms and breast cancer. However, the results altered when the analyses were restricted to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (for rs3761549: TT+CT vs. CC OR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.38–0.72; TC vs. CC OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.16–0.39; T vs. C OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59–0.97. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 3.20, 95% CI 1.76–5.81; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 2.56, 95% CI, 1.75–3.76; AA vs. CC OR, 4.41, 95% CI, 2.36–8.25; AC vs. CC OR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.42–3.25; A vs. C OR, 2.32, 95% CI, 1.74–3.10). The present meta-analysis indicates that the FOXP3 rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms are not associated with the risk of breast cancer, but with the risk of HCC and NSCLC. Therefore, a study with a larger sample size is required to further evaluate this association.

 FOXP3 polymorphism cancer meta-analysis Introduction

Cancer is a worldwide public health problem, which results from a complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors (1). Several polymorphic genes that are directly involved in tumorigenesis have also been proposed to contribute to the individual susceptibility to cancer (2).

The host immune defense has been shown to play a vital role in modulating human carcinogenesis (3). Regulatory T cells aid in keeping the balance between immunity and autotolerance, and are mainly characterized by CD4+/FOXP3+ or CD4+/CD25+/FOXP3+ expression. FOXP3 belongs to the forkhead family of transcription factors, and is involved in the regulation, activation and differentiation of T cells (4). In fact, the absence of a functional FOXP3 gene product has been revealed to cause an abnormal production of regulatory T cells (5). In addition, the loss of expression and somatic mutation of the human FOXP3 gene has been identified in human prostate and breast cancers. This suggests that FOXP3 may be a tumor suppressor and that inactivation of the FOXP3 gene may contribute to the development of cancer in humans (6,7).

The FOXP3 gene is positioned at the Xp11.23 locus on the X chromosome and encodes the FOXP3 protein, which is expressed in epithelial cells from various organs, such as the lungs and the thymus (8–11). The promoter polymorphisms in the FOXP3 gene are considered to affect FOXP3 production and activity. The FOXP3 gene rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms, located on the promoter region of the FOXP3 gene, are two of the most common single nucleotide polymorphisms. Previous studies have investigated the association between the FOXP3 rs3761549 and rs3761548 polymorphisms and the cancer risk, however, they have yielded conflicting results (12–16). Therefore, the present meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the role of these two polymorphisms and their association with the risk of cancer.

 Materials and methods Publication search and inclusion criteria

A comprehensive literature search, using the keywords ‘FOXP3’, ‘polymorphism’ and ‘tumor or cancer’, was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese Wanfang databases (last search updated in February 10, 2014). Additional eligible studies were identified by manually searching the reference lists of reviews and original articles. In the event that data were published in more than one article, only studies with the largest sample size were selected for. The selection criteria to identify an eligible study were as follows: i) Investigation of the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms of the FOXP3 gene and cancer risk; ii) the use of a case-control design, based on unrelated individuals; and iii) sufficient genotype distributions for cases and controls, so that an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) could be assessed.

 Data extraction

The two authors independently reviewed and extracted the required data. Disagreements were resolved through discussion among the authors to achieve a consensus. The following information was recorded for each study: First author, year of publication, country, ethnicity, cancer type and number of genotypes (Table I).

 Statistical analysis

The OR corresponding to the 95% CI was used to assess the association between the FOXP3 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer. In addition to this comparison among all subjects, a stratified analysis by cancer type was also performed. The statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I2 statistics and the Q-test (17). In the absence of any obvious heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model (the Mantel-Haenszel method) was applied to estimate the summary OR. Otherwise, the random-effects model (the DerSimonian and Laird method) was used (18,19). Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the effect that the data from each study had on the pooled OR. Finally, any publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot. All of the statistical tests were performed using RevMan 5.0 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK).

 Results

The process of identifying suitable studies is shown in Fig. 1. A total of five studies (12–16), including 3,275 cases and 3,300 controls, were included in the present meta-analysis. All of the selected studies were based on Asian populations (Table I). The results of the pooled analysis revealed no significant association between the FOXP3 gene polymorphisms and the cancer risk (for rs3761549: TT vs. CT+CC OR, 1.20, 95% CI, 0.87–1.66; TT+CT vs. CC OR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.41–1.33; TT vs. CC OR, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.76–1.46; TC vs. CC OR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.17–1.80; T vs. C OR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.83–1.06. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 1.37, 95% CI, 0.87–2.16; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 1.18, 95% CI, 0.79–1.78; AA vs. CC OR, 1.36, 95% CI, 0.67–2.77; AC vs. CC OR, 1.11, 95% CI, 0.79–1.58; A vs. C OR, 1.21, 95% CI, 0.90–1.62). Further subgroup analysis was conducted based on cancer type, however, no association between the FOXP3 gene polymorphisms and the risk of breast cancer was revealed (for rs3761549: TT vs. CT+CC OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.60–1.60; TT+CT vs. CC OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 0.84–1.22; TT vs. CC OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.60–1.61; TC vs. CC OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.84–1.23; T vs. C OR, 1.01, 95% CI, 0.87–1.16. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 1.09, 95% CI, 0.93–1.28; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 1.00, 95% CI, 0.88–1.12; AA vs. CC OR, 1.04, 95% CI, 0.86–1.26; AC vs. CC OR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.86–1.10; A vs. C OR, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.94–1.11). However, statistical associations were observed with respect to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (for rs3761549: TT+CT vs. CC OR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.38–0.72; TC vs. CC OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.16–0.39; T vs. C: OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59–0.97. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 3.20, 95% CI, 1.76–5.81; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 2.56, 95% CI, 1.75–3.76; AA vs. CC OR, 4.41, 95% CI, 2.36–8.25; AC vs. CC OR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.42–3.25; A vs. C OR, 2.32, 95% CI, 1.74–3.10) (Table II). The funnel plot, which assessed publication bias of the literature, appeared symmetrical in all of the genetic models (Fig. 2).

 Discussion

The characterization and identification of genes involved in the genetic predisposition and progression of cancer are critical for clinical practice and basic medical research. FOXP3 is an immunological regulator, and is able to repress oncogenes whilst activating additional tumor suppressor genes (6,20–22). FOXP3-mediated gene regulation follows the histone code of gene activation and suppression and alters histone modifications by binding to gene promoters (23,24). Epidemiological studies suggest that the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms, rs3761549 and rs376154, are associated with the cancer risk. However, the results from these studies are conflicting. To provide a more detailed overview of the association, five genetic models were used in the current meta-analysis.

To the best of our knowledge, this was the first meta-analysis to provide comprehensive insight into the association between the FOXP3 polymorphisms and the risk of cancer. It was identified that the FOXP3 rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of cancer among an Asian population. In addition, subgroup analysis revealed that the FOXP3 gene rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms were not associated with the risk of breast cancer. However, the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms were linked with the risk of HCC and NSCLC, respectively. The results therefore indicated that the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms may have a varying effect on carcinogenesis within different organs. However, these findings must be viewed with caution, since studies on HCC and NSCLC are rare. Therefore, the results from the present study may be due to chance.

There were certain limitations of this meta-analysis. Firstly, a relatively small number of studies and subjects were included, which could reduce the statistical power of the analysis. Secondly, the results were based on unadjusted estimates. A more precise analysis could be conducted if individual data were available. Thirdly, all published studies were based on Asian populations. Therefore, the results of this meta-analysis may be applicable to the specified ethnicity alone.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms in the promoter region of the FOXP3 gene were not associated with breast cancer, but instead were associated with HCC and NSCLC. Therefore, a future study that consists of a larger sample size is required to further evaluate this association.

 References GaoXHuangMLiuLInsertion/deletion polymorphisms in the promoter region of BRM contribute to risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese populationsPLoS One8e551692013 YingHWangJGaoXCCL5-403, CCR5-59029, and Delta32 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 20,625 subjectsTumour Biol35589559042014 SchneebergerAKoszikFStinglGImmunologic host defense in melanoma: delineation of effector mechanisms involved and of strategies for the augmentation of their efficacyJ Invest Dermatol105Suppl 1S110S1161995 HoriSNomuraTSakaguchiSControl of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3Science299105710612003 RoncadorGGarciaJFGarciaJFFOXP3, a selective marker for a subset of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphomaLeukemia19224722532005 WangLLiuRLiWSomatic single hits inactivate the X-linked tumor suppressor FOXP3 in the prostateCancer Cell163363462009 ZuoTLiuRZhangHFOXP3 is a novel transcriptional repressor for the breast cancer oncogene SKP2J Clin Invest117376537732007 BennettCLBrunkowMERamsdellFA rare polyadenylation signal mutation of the FOXP3 gene (AAUAAA→AAUGAA) leads to the IPEX syndromeImmunogenetics534354392001 GuptaSJoshiKWigJDAroraSKIntratumoral FOXP3 expression in infiltrating breast carcinoma: Its association with clinicopathologic parameters and angiogenesisActa Oncol467927972007 KaranikasVSpeletasMZamanakouMFOXP3 expression in human cancer cellsJ Transl Med6192008 KatohHZhengPLiuYSignalling through FoxP3 as an X-linked tumor suppressorInt J Biochem Cell Biol42178417872010 ChenYZhangHLiaoWFOXP3 gene polymorphism is associated with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma in ChinaJ Exp Clin Cancer Res32392013 HeYQBoQYongWQiuZXLiYLLiWMFoxP3 genetic variants and risk of non-small cell lung cancer in the Chinese Han populationGene5314224252013 JahanPRamachanderVRMaruthiGNaliniSLathaKPMurthyTSFoxp3 promoter polymorphism (rs3761548) in breast cancer progression: a study from IndiaTumour Biol35378537912014 RaskinLRennertGGruberSBFOXP3 germline polymorphisms are not associated with risk of breast cancerCancer Genet Cytogenet19040422009 ZhengJDengJJiangLHeterozygous genetic variations of FOXP3 in Xp11.23 elevate breast cancer risk in Chinese population via skewed X-chromosome inactivationHum Mutat346196282013 HigginsJPThompsonSGQuantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStat Med21153915582002 MantelNHaenszelWStatistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of diseaseJ Natl Cancer Inst227197481959 DerSimonianRLairdNMeta-analysis in clinical trialsControl Clin Trials71771881986 ZuoTWangLMorrisonCFOXP3 is an X-linked breast cancer suppressor gene and an important repressor of the HER-2/ErbB2 oncogeneCell129127512862007 LiuRWangLChenGFOXP3 up-regulates p21 expression by site-specific inhibition of histone deacetylase 2/histone deacetylase 4 association to the locusCancer Res69225222592009 LiWWangLKatohHIdentification of a tumor suppressor relay between the FOXP3 and the Hippo pathways in breast and prostate cancersCancer Res71216221712011 KatohHQinZSLiuRFOXP3 orchestrates H4K16 acetylation and H3K4 trimethylation for activation of multiple genes by recruiting MOF and causing displacement of PLU-1Mol Cell447707842011 MarsonAKretschmerKFramptonGMFoxP3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulationNature4459319352007

Process of identifying included studies.

Funnel plot of the meta-analysis data to demonstrate the associations between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk. (A) rs3761549 T vs. C and (B) rs3761548 A vs. C. OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.

Characteristics of studies included in the present meta-analysis.

rs3761549 rs3761548
First author (ref.) Year Country Ethnicity Cancer type Case (TT/CT/CC) Control (TT/CT/CC) Case (AA/AC/CC) Control (AA/AC/CC)
Chen et al (12) 2013 China Asian Hepatocellular carcinoma 59/28/301 41/88/233 - -
He et al (13) 2013 China Asian Non-small cell lung cancer - - 37/80/75 18/80/161
Jahan et al (14) 2013 India Asian Breast cancer 0/198/4 0/128/2 27/160/15 20/106/4
Raskin et al (15) 2009 Israel Asian Breast cancer - - 320/722/402 303/763/392
Zheng et al (16) 2013 China Asian Breast cancer 32/283/734 34/290/767 38/338/673 30/342/719

Meta-analysis data of the associations between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and the cancer risk in all genetic models.

A, rs3761549 polymorphism
TT vs. CT+CC TT+CT vs. CC TT vs. CC TC vs. CC T vs. C
Variables OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Total 1.20 (0.87–1.66) 0.28 0.74 (0.41–1.33) 0.01 1.06 (0.76–1.46) 0.71 0.56 (0.17–1.80) 0.01 0.94 (0.83–1.06) 0.15
Breast cancer 0.98 (0.60–1.60) - 1.01 (0.84–1.22) 0.76 0.98 (0.60–1.61) - 1.02 (0.84–1.23) 0.75 1.01 (0.87–1.16) 0.92
HCC 1.40 (0.92–2.15) - 0.52 (0.38–0.72) - 1.11 (0.72–1.72) - 0.25 (0.16–0.39) - 0.76 (0.59–0.97) -
B, rs3761548 polymorphism
AA vs. AC+CC AA+AC vs. CC AA vs. CC AC vs. CC A vs. C
Variables OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Total 1.37 (0.87–2.16) 0.01 1.18 (0.79–1.78) 0.01 1.36 (0.67–2.77) 0.01 1.11 (0.79–1.58) 0.01 1.21 (0.90–1.62) 0.01
Breast cancer 1.09 (0.93–1.28) 0.53 1.00 (0.88–1.12) 0.16 1.04 (0.86–1.26) 0.14 0.97 (0.86–1.10) 0.18 1.02 (0.94–1.11) 0.45
NSCLC 3.20 (1.76–5.81) - 2.56 (1.75–3.76) - 4.41 (2.36–8.25) - 2.15 (1.42–3.25) - 2.32 (1.74–3.10) -

Bold indicates significant results for the association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; P-value, P-value for heterogeneity.