<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">OR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oncology Reports</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1021-335X</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-2431</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/or.2013.2354</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">or-29-06-2133</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparison of the bromodeoxyuridine-mediated sensitization effects between low-LET and high-LET ionizing radiation on DNA double-strand breaks</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>FUJII</surname><given-names>YOSHIHIRO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">1</xref><xref rid="af2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>GENET</surname><given-names>MATTHEW D.</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>ROYBAL</surname><given-names>ERICA J.</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>KUBOTA</surname><given-names>NOBUO</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>OKAYASU</surname><given-names>RYUICHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MIYAGAWA</surname><given-names>KIYOSHI</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>FUJIMORI</surname><given-names>AKIRA</given-names></name><xref rid="af4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">4</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>KATO</surname><given-names>TAKAMITSU A.</given-names></name><xref rid="af3-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="aff">3</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-or-29-06-2133"/></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-or-29-06-2133">
<label>1</label>Department of Radiological Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Inashiki, Ibaraki 300-0394, Japan</aff>
<aff id="af2-or-29-06-2133">
<label>2</label>The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan</aff>
<aff id="af3-or-29-06-2133">
<label>3</label>Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA</aff>
<aff id="af4-or-29-06-2133">
<label>4</label>National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, International Open Laboratory, Anagawa Inage, Chiba 263-8555, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-or-29-06-2133">Correspondence to: Dr Takamitsu A. Kato, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, 1618 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, E-mail: <email>tkato@rams.colostate.edu</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>6</month>
<year>2013</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2013</year></pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<fpage>2133</fpage>
<lpage>2139</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2012</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>17</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2012</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2013, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<license-p>This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The incorporation of halogenated pyrmidines such as bromo- and iodo-deoxyuridines (BrdU, IdU) into DNA as thymidine analogs enhances cellular radiosensitivity when high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is not used. Although it is known that high-LET ionizing radiation confers fewer biological effects resulting from halogenated pyrimidine incorporation, the exact mechanisms of reduced radiosensitivity with high-LET radiation are not clear. We investigated the radiosensitization effects of halogenated pyrimidines with high-LET radiation using accelerated carbon and iron ions. Cells synchronized into the G<sub>1</sub> phase after unifilar (1 cell cycle) and bifilar (2 cell cycles) substitution with 10 &#x003BC;M BrdU were exposed to various degrees of LET with heavy ions and X-rays. We then carried out a colony formation assay to measure cell survival. The &#x003B3;-H2AX focus formation assay provided a measure of DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation and repair kinetics. Chromosomal aberration formations for the first post-irradiation metaphase were also scored. For both low-LET X-rays and carbon ions (13 keV/&#x003BC;m), BrdU incorporation led to impaired DNA repair kinetics, a larger initial number of DNA DSBs more frequent chromosomal aberrations at the first post-irradiated metaphase, and increased radiosensitivity for cell lethality. The enhancement ratio was higher after bifilar substitution. In contrast, no such synergistic enhancements were observed after high-LET irradiation with carbon and iron ions (70 and 200 keV/&#x003BC;m, respectively), even after bifilar substitution. Our results suggest that BrdU substitution did not modify the number and quality of DNA DSBs produced by high-LET radiation. The incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines may produce more complex/clustered DNA damage along with radicals formed by low-LET ionizing radiation. In contrast, the severity of damage produced by high-LET radiation may undermine the effects of BrdU and account for the observed minimal radiosensitization effects.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>bromodeoxyuridine</kwd>
<kwd>linear energy transfer</kwd>
<kwd>double-strand break</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Halogenated pyrimidines are well known as classic radiosensitizers for low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation such as X-rays and &#x003B3;-rays (<xref rid="b1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). They also have strong sensitization effects for visible and ultraviolet light (<xref rid="b5-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b7-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). The mechanisms of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-mediated radiosensitization have been explained elsewhere (<xref rid="b8-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b12-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). Simply put, single-strand break formation from BrdU-mediated radicals results in the formation of lethal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Since sensitization can be partially reduced by adding radical scavengers such as acetone, various reports suggest that BrdU either produces lethal DSBs or fixes potentially lethal damage (PLD) to enhance cell killing (<xref rid="b13-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b16-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>).</p>
<p>High-LET radiation has a strong effect on cell killing when compared to low-LET radiation. Namely, it achieves a higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) than low-LET radiation (<xref rid="b17-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b20-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>) by producing dense ionization and causing complex, clustered DNA damage (<xref rid="b21-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b24-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>). However, the complex clustered damage produced by high-LET radiation is not fully understood (<xref rid="b21-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). Radiosensitizers are typically less effective when using high-LET radiation when compared with low-LET radiation (<xref rid="b25-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>,<xref rid="b26-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>).</p>
<p>Reports have indicated that the incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines not only increases the magnitude of radiation-induced DNA damage, but also suppresses DNA damage repair (<xref rid="b2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b9-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b16-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). High-LET radiation produces &#x02018;clustered damage&#x02019;, a type of DNA damage which is also difficult to repair (<xref rid="b2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b9-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b16-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). LET-dependent sensitization of halogenated pyrimidines is reported in cellular lethality (<xref rid="b25-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). As LET increases, increased clustered DNA damage is formed. At LET &gt;100 keV/&#x003BC;m, the RBE declines as LET increases (<xref rid="b27-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>,<xref rid="b28-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>).</p>
<p>We hypothesized that the mechanism of BrdU-induced hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation is based on the quality of DNA DSBs. We examined the effects of combinations of high-LET heavy ions and unifilar and bifilar BrdU substitution in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to better understand the BrdU dependency. In this study, we revealed that BrdU substitution followed by low-LET radiation altered DNA damages into more complex damages similar to those observed after high-LET radiation exposure only, while no additional effects on cellular lethality, chromosomal aberrations and DNA DSB formation and repair were observed following high-LET radiation with BrdU.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Cell lines and culture</title>
<p>Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO10B2) cells (wild-type) were kindly supplied by Dr Joel Bedford of Colorado State University (Fort Collins, CO, USA). Cells were grown in &#x003B1;MEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10&#x00025; heat-inactivated (56&#x000B0;C for 30 min) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1&#x00025; antibiotics and antimycotics (Invitrogen) in a humidified 5&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere at 37&#x000B0;C. Cell doubling time was ~12 h.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Irradiation and drug treatment</title>
<p>Cells were cultured in a moderately toxic concentration of BrdU (10 &#x003BC;M, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) for our experiments. Log phase cells were cultured in 10 &#x003BC;M BrdU for 10 or 20 h before synchronization to achieve unifilar (&gt;95&#x00025;) or bifilar (~95&#x00025;) substitution, respectively. The substitution of BrdU was confirmed by immunocytochemistry against the BrdU antibody (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for unifilar and fluorescence plus Giemsa (FPG) differential staining on metaphase chromosomes for bifilar (<xref rid="b29-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). Cell cycle synchronization was achieved by the mitotic shake-off method (<xref rid="b30-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). Two hours after shake-off, &gt;95&#x00025; of cells were synchronized in the G<sub>1</sub> phase before they were exposed to ionizing radiation. Cell synchronization was confirmed by flow cytometry. The Titan X-ray irradiator (200 kVp, 20 mA, 0.5-mm Al and 0.5-mm Cu filters; Shimadzu, Japan) yields an X-ray dose of ~1 Gy/min at room temperature. For heavy ion exposure, accelerated ions were irradiated using the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) at room temperature. Radiation exposure was carried out in a dark environment to prevent cellular toxicity from room light. Dosimetry and beam quality tests for heavy ions were carried out and confirmed by operators of Accelerator Engineering Corp. (Chiba, Japan) (<xref rid="b31-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b34-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Chromosomal aberration assay</title>
<p>To achieve first metaphase arrest, post-irradiated cells were treated with 0.1 &#x003BC;g/ml Colcemid (Sigma) 10&#x02013;16 h after irradiation. The cells were treated with 75 mM KCl for 15 min at 37&#x000B0;C. After hypotonic treatment, the cells were fixed with fixative &#x0005B;methanol:acetic acid solution (3:1)&#x0005D; three times and were dropped onto slides. The samples were stained with filtered 10&#x00025; (v/v) Giemsa solution in Gurr solution (Invitrogen). At least 30 metaphase cells were scored in at least three separate experiments. Chromosomal aberrations were scored as dicentric, fragment, ring, and interstitial and terminal deletion and pooled as total chromosomal aberrations per cell.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Colony formation assay</title>
<p>Cells were trypsinized and plated into P-60 cell culture dishes immediately after the ionizing radiation exposure. Approximately one week later, cells were fixed with 100&#x00025; ethanol and stained with crystal violet for colony counting. Colonies containing &gt;50 cells were counted as survivors. Plating efficiency was ~75&#x00025; for the control and 70&#x00025; for both unifilar and bifilar cells. RBE was calculated from doses required to achieve 10&#x00025; survival fraction, and the sensitization enhancement ratio (SER) was calculated from the doses required to achieve 37&#x00025; cell survival.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>&#x003B3;-H2AX formation assay</title>
<p>Synchronized cells were grown on chamber slides for 2 h. After irradiation of 1 Gy and various incubation times (1, 2, or 3 h post-irradiation), the cells were fixed and stained as previously described (<xref rid="b35-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>,<xref rid="b36-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). Cellular imaging was accomplished using an Olympus FV300 fluorescence confocal microscope equipped with an Olympus Fluoview three dimensional image analysis system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The foci were scored in at least 50 cells per data point. Three to four independent experiments were carried out.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical comparison of mean values was performed using a t-test. Differences with a P-value of &lt;0.05 were considered to indicate a statistically significant result. Error bars indicate standard error of the means. Confidence interval values were calculated by Prism 5&#x02122; software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of the BrdU substitution-induced radiosensitization effect with X-rays and heavy ions in a colony formation assay</title>
<p>For X-rays and carbon ions with LET of 13 keV/&#x003BC;m, BrdU-incorporated cells were more sensitive to ionizing radiation when compared with the BrdU-negative controls (<xref rid="f1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A and B</xref>). Both the initial shoulder and slope of the survival curves were affected by BrdU incorporation. The sensitization effect of BrdU bifilar substituted cells was stronger than unifilar incorporation. In contrast, for higher LET using heavy ions such as carbon ions at LET of 70 keV/&#x003BC;m or iron ions at LET of 200 keV/&#x003BC;m, BrdU substitution did not induce synergistic sensitization with ionizing radiation (<xref rid="f1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C and D</xref>). The D<sub>10</sub> value, the dose which resulted in 10&#x00025; cell survival and the D<sub>37</sub>, value, the dose which resulted in 37&#x00025; cell survival, decreased depending on the level of BrdU incorporation (<xref rid="tI-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). For example, the D<sub>10</sub> value of 5.4 for X-irradiated unlabeled cells was reduced to 3.6 in bifilarly labeled cells, and that of 4.9 for 13 keV/&#x003BC;m LET carbon ion-exposed unlabeled cells was reduced to 3.4 in bifilarly labeled cells. For high-LET radiation, the change in D<sub>10</sub> value of LET 70 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions was from 2.7 to 2.3, and that of LET 200 keV/&#x003BC;m iron ions was from 2.4 to 2.1 for unlabeled to bifilar BrdU substitution. Differences between sets of D<sub>10</sub> values were statistically significant. On the other hand, for the D<sub>37</sub> values of unlabeled and bifilar BrdU substitution for high-LET carbon and iron ions, differences between them were regarded as statistically not significant.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of BrdU substitution-induced radiosensitization effect with X-rays and heavy ions in a chromosomal aberration assay</title>
<p>As previously shown in the colony formation assay, BrdU-mediated radiosensitization was impaired as LET increased (<xref rid="f1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C and D</xref>). To further investigate the mechanism of cell killing, we analyzed first post-irradiation metaphase chromosomes with a chromosomal aberration assay. As predicted from the survival data, no additional chromosomal aberrations were observed after BrdU substitution and subsequent high-LET radiation exposure (<xref rid="tII-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). After X-ray or LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ion exposure, BrdU substitution-mediated radiosensitization was observed at each dose point (1 and 2 Gy) with BrdU incorporation. For instance, bifilar incorporation at 2 Gy increased chromosomal aberrations by 1.71- (from 0.75 to 1.33) and 1.82-fold (from 1.06 to 1.93) for X-rays and LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, respectively. In contrast, there was almost no radiosensitization at any dose or incorporation time as a result of carbon (70 keV/&#x003BC;m) or iron (200 keV/&#x003BC;m) ions.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison of BrdU-induced enhancement effect with X-rays and heavy ions in the &#x003B3;-H2AX formation assay</title>
<p>DNA DSBs result in chromosomal aberrations and cell killing. To investigate the initial amount of DNA damage and DNA repair efficiency following various radiation exposures, we performed a &#x003B3;-H2AX foci formation assay. One hour after X-ray exposure 22.6 foci per cell for controls, 25.5 foci per cell for unifilar substitution (13&#x00025; increase), and 27.8 foci per cell for bifilar incorporation (23&#x00025; increase) were scored. At 3 h after irradiation, the numbers of foci remaining were 9.2 for controls, 12.1 for unifilar incorporation (32&#x00025; increase), and 14.5 foci for bifilar incorporation (58&#x00025; increase) (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). For LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, the number of &#x003B3;-H2AX foci was 18.2 and 6.6 for controls, 21.5 (18&#x00025; increase) and 9.3 (41&#x00025; increase) for single BrdU incorporation, and 24.1 (52&#x00025; increase) and 12.1 (83&#x00025; increase) for double incorporation at 1 and 3 h, respectively (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Low-LET radiation resulted in an increased number of initial BrdU-induced DNA DSBs and an increased amount of damage remaining in BrdU-incorporated cells. In contrast, high-LET radiation resulted in no significant difference in the number of initial BrdU-induced DNA DSBs or damage remaining in the BrdU-incorporated cells (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>).</p>
<p>To estimate the effects on repair capacity resulting from BrdU substitution, we calculated half-lives for the reduction of &#x003B3;-H2AX foci between 1 and 3 h post-irradiation (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Half lives for low-LET exposures increased with the amount of BrdU substitution (from 1.54 to 2.12 h for X-ray bifilar and 1.35 to 1.97 h for bifilar LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon-ions). In contrast, high-LET exposures (iron-ions in particular) showed no significant difference in &#x003B3;-H2AX foci half-lives with or without BrdU substitution (from 2.69 to 2.78 h, P&lt;0.05).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>BrdU substitution effects RBE and SER</title>
<p>In order to assess BrdU substitution effects on radiosensitization, RBE and SER values were obtained. Without BrdU substitution, CHO10B2 cells showed a maximum of an ~2.1 RBE value at LET 200 keV/&#x003BC;m. The LET values were decreased when cells were incorporated with unifilar or bifilar BrdU. The degree of reduction was stronger for bifilar BrdU substitution than unifilar BrdU substitution (<xref rid="f3-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>). SER values showed that unifilar BrdU substitutions are ~1.4 more effective in cell killing when compared to values without substitution with X-ray exposure, while there was only a 1.1 increase in effectiveness with high LET radiation such as carbon 70 keV/&#x003BC;m and iron ions 200 keV/&#x003BC;m (<xref rid="f4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>). The same trend was observed for bifilar substitution. The SER values were decreased from 1.6 to 1.2.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In order to investigate the reduced synergistic effects of a combination of high-LET radiation and BrdU incorporation, we compared the damage resulting from low- or high-LET radiation exposure with and without BrdU substitution with several endpoints. We showed that BrdU substitution mediated radiosensitization effects on low-LET photon radiation and particle radiation but similar cellular lethality was observed after high-LET radiation (<xref rid="f1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). Linstadt <italic>et al</italic>(<xref rid="b25-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>) proved that the extent of radiosensitization caused by IdU, a halogenated pyrimidine, decreased as the LET increased. In addition, they found very small sensitization enhancements for the distal peak (82 keV/&#x003BC;m) and Bragg peak (183 keV/&#x003BC;m) of a Neon ion beam and no radiosensitization was observed for an extremely high-LET Lanthanum ion beam with 1000 keV/&#x003BC;m (<xref rid="b25-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). Our study was consistent with these results as carbon ions with LET 70 keV/&#x003BC;m and iron ions with LET 200 keV/&#x003BC;m following unifilar or bifilar BrdU incorporation yielded very weak radiosensitization for cellular lethality. <xref rid="f3-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref> shows the RBE values calculated from D<sub>10</sub> with BrdU substitution (<xref rid="tI-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). Smaller RBE values were noted after high-LET radiation exposure with BrdU substitution. Among the same BrdU substituted cells, high-LET and high RBE advantage was lost. The SER values for high-LET were smaller when cells were incorporated with more BrdU (<xref rid="f4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A and B</xref>). When halogenated pyrimidine is used for clinical practice, it is worthy to note that enhancement of cell killing would be smaller using carbon ion radiotherapy than that expected in X-ray radiotherapy. Normal tissues incorporated with BrdU would be severely sensitized following low-LET exposure. Therefore, the dose to patients should be reduced to avoid adverse side effects.</p>
<p><xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref> shows that initial (1 h post-irradiation) DNA damage observed as phosphorylated H2AX foci was increased with BrdU incorporation degrees only for low-LET radiation but not high-LET radiation. Therefore, we assume that initial DNA damages are increased with BrdU substitution for low-LET radiation but not for high-LET radiation. This result was consistent with other reports (<xref rid="b4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b15-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). As a result of more initial damage and slower repair, there were additional &#x003B3;-H2AX foci in BrdU substituted cells after low-LET radiation. &#x003B3;-H2AX foci are excellent markers for DNA double-strand breaks. H2AX is phosphorylated ~2 mega bases from a DSB site (<xref rid="b35-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>,<xref rid="b36-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). We could not exclude the possibility that additional DSBs were produced by BrdU sensitization following high-LET radiation within short range to be recognized as a single focus.</p>
<p>In order to evaluate DNA repair kinetics, we calculated the half-life of &#x003B3;-H2AX foci from 1 to 3 h after irradiation (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). Many DNA DSB repair deficient mutants were found to have slower kinetics of DSB repair and &#x003B3;-H2AX foci disappearance (<xref rid="b37-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b39-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">39</xref>). Half-lives of &#x003B3;-H2AX foci were affected by BrdU substitutions for low-LET radiation, but not for high-LET radiation (<xref rid="f2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). The results coincide with other studies, suggesting that slower repair is one of the possible mechanisms for BrdU-induced radiosensitization (<xref rid="b2-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b13-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b16-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b40-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>). In contrast, one study found that halogenated pyrimidines did not effect the repair of PLD for low-LET radiation (X-rays and neon ions with LET 38 keV/&#x003BC;m) and sublethal damage repair (<xref rid="b25-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>).</p>
<p>We clearly observed that the combination of BrdU and high-LET radiation does not increase the half-life of &#x003B3;-H2AX foci disappearance any more than high-LET radiation alone. This suggests that the BrdU substitution did not modify DNA DSBs produced by high-LET radiation or such modifications were naturally formed by high-LET radiation. Multiple publications suggest that high-LET radiation produces dense ionization in their tracks and produce multiple damages near DNA double-strand breaks and form clustered and complex damage (<xref rid="b4-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b12-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b22-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>,<xref rid="b41-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>). These damages are very difficult to repair and it results in high lethality per absorbed physical dose. BrdU-mediated free radicals form lesions such as single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, and complex double-strand breaks (<xref rid="b12-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). We assumed that BrdU could not contribute any biological response once high-LET produced enough dense ionization on their target. LET &gt;100 keV/&#x003BC;m constitutes an overdose as excess ionizing events do not efficiently produce DSBs (<xref rid="b41-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b43-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">43</xref>).</p>
<p>These results indicate that there was no detectable difference in the amount of DNA double-strand break formation and no detectable effects for repair kinetics for high-LET radiation with or without BrdU incorporation. These results were directly correlated to no differences in the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in metaphase chromosomes and cellular lethality for high LET radiation with or without BrdU substitution (<xref rid="f1-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>, <xref rid="tII-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>).</p>
<p>BrdU and other halogenated pyrimidines appear not to be practical sensitizers to combine with carbon ion radiotherapy due to the severe sensitization to normal tissue and the small sensitization to cancer at higher LET radiation. But LET for the spread out Bragg peak for carbon ion radiotherapy contains a wide range of LET (<xref rid="b32-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>,<xref rid="b34-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>,<xref rid="b44-or-29-06-2133" ref-type="bibr">44</xref>). In this range we would expect some sensitization for tumor control but the SER would not be as high as that for low-LET radiation such as photon and proton radiation.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Dr Jamie Bush and Mr. Charles Yurkon of Colorado State University for proofreading our manuscript. This study was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant in Aid (Young Scientists B19710056 to T.K.)and by start-up funds from Colorado State University and Dr Akiko M. Ueno Radiation Biology Research Fund. This study was part of a Research Project with Heavy Ions at the NIRS (National Institute of Radiological Sciences)-HIMAC.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-or-29-06-2133"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitchell</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Russo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Cook</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Straus</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Glatstein</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiobiology and clinical application of halogenated pyrimidine radiosensitizers</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>827</fpage><lpage>836</lpage><year>1989</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-or-29-06-2133"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franken</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Bree</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name><name><surname>Kipp</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Barendsen</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Modification of potentially lethal damage in irradiated Chinese hamster V79 cells after incorporation of halogenated pyrimidines</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>101</fpage><lpage>109</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-or-29-06-2133"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Lawrence</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Seabury</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Bromodeoxyuridine-mediated radiosensitization in human glioma: the effect of concentration, duration, and fluoropyrimidine modulation</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>601</fpage><lpage>607</lpage><year>1994</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-or-29-06-2133"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kinsella</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobson</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Mitchell</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Fornace</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Enhancement of X ray-induced DNA damage by pre-treatment with halogenated pyrimidine analogs</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>733</fpage><lpage>739</lpage><year>1987</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-or-29-06-2133"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>UVB-induced formation of intrastrand cross-link products of DNA in MCF-7 cells treated with 5-bromo-2&#x02032;-deoxyuridine</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>8189</fpage><lpage>8195</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-or-29-06-2133"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sequence-dependent formation of intrastrand crosslink products from the UVB irradiation of duplex DNA containing a 5-bromo-2&#x02032;-deoxyuridine or 5-bromo-2&#x02032;-deoxycytidine</article-title><source>Nucleic Acids Res</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>6521</fpage><lpage>6529</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-or-29-06-2133"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Puck</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>FT</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. V Treatment with 5-bromodeoxyuridine and visible light for isolation of nutritionally deficient mutants</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>1227</fpage><lpage>1234</lpage><year>1967</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-or-29-06-2133"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iliakis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantelias</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurtzman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines: effect of BrdU on cell killing and interphase chromosome breakage in radiation-sensitive cells</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-or-29-06-2133"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Webb</surname><given-names>CF</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Moyer</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguilera</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ling</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanisms of radiosensitization in bromodeoxyuridine-substituted cells</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>695</fpage><lpage>705</lpage><year>1993</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-or-29-06-2133"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zimbrick</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Myers</surname><given-names>LS</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Studies on the chemical basis of cellular radiosensitization by 5-bromouracil substitution in DNA. I Pulse- and steady-state radiolysis of 5-bromouracil and thymine</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>505</fpage><lpage>523</lpage><year>1969</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-or-29-06-2133"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zimbrick</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Myers</surname><given-names>LS</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Studies on the chemical basis of cellular radiosensitization by 5-bromouracil substitution in DNA. II Pulse- and steady state radiolysis of bromouracil-substituted and -unsubstituted DNA</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>525</fpage><lpage>534</lpage><year>1969</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-or-29-06-2133"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Nikjoo</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Modelling the effect of incorporated halogenated pyrimidine on radiation-induced DNA strand breaks</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>78</volume><fpage>953</fpage><lpage>966</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-or-29-06-2133"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Ward</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Limoli</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Moyer</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguilera</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanisms of radiosensitization in iododeoxyuridine-substituted cells</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>67</volume><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>653</lpage><year>1995</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-or-29-06-2133"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iliakis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantelias</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Metzger</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines: effect of BrdU on repair of DNA breaks, interphase chromatin breaks, and potentially lethal damage in plateau-phase CHO cells</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>129</volume><fpage>202</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><year>1992</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-or-29-06-2133"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iliakis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurtzman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantelias</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Okayasu</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines: effect of BrdU on radiation induction of DNA and chromosome damage and its correlation with cell killing</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>119</volume><fpage>286</fpage><lpage>304</lpage><year>1989</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-or-29-06-2133"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Iliakis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurtzman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines: bromodeoxyuridine and beta-arabinofuranosyladenine affect similar subsets of radiation-induced potentially lethal lesions in plateau-phase Chinese hamster ovary cells</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>127</volume><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>51</lpage><year>1991</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-or-29-06-2133"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blakely</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Kronenberg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Heavy-ion radiobiology: new approaches to delineate mechanisms underlying enhanced biological effectiveness</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>150</volume><fpage>S126</fpage><lpage>S145</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-or-29-06-2133"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eguchi-Kasai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Murakami</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Itsukaichi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Repair of DNA double-strand breaks and cell killing by charged particles</article-title><source>Adv Space Res</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>543</fpage><lpage>549</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-or-29-06-2133"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsujii</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizoe</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamada</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Overview of clinical experiences on carbon ion radiotherapy at NIRS</article-title><source>Radiother Oncol</source><volume>73</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><fpage>S41</fpage><lpage>S49</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-or-29-06-2133"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakel</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The relative biological effectiveness of proton and ion beams</article-title><source>Z Med Phys</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>285</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-or-29-06-2133"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prise</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>156</volume><fpage>572</fpage><lpage>576</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-or-29-06-2133"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fakir</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sachs</surname><given-names>RK</given-names></name><name><surname>Stenerlow</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Hofmann</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clusters of DNA double-strand breaks induced by different doses of nitrogen ions for various LETs: experimental measurements and theoretical analyses</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>166</volume><fpage>917</fpage><lpage>927</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-or-29-06-2133"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hada</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Georgakilas</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Formation of clustered DNA damage after high-LET irradiation: a review</article-title><source>J Radiat Res</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><year>2008</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-or-29-06-2133"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Prise</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Evidence for complexity at the nanometer scale of radiation-induced DNA DSBs as a determinant of rejoining kinetics</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>164</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-or-29-06-2133"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Linstadt</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Blakely</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>TL</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiosensitization produced by iododeoxyuridine with high linear energy transfer heavy ion beams</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>703</fpage><lpage>710</lpage><year>1988</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-or-29-06-2133"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>NG</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Wortmannin enhances the induction of micronuclei by low and high LET radiation</article-title><source>Mutagenesis</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><year>2003</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-or-29-06-2133"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skarsgard</surname><given-names>LD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiobiology with heavy charged particles: a historical review</article-title><source>Phys Med</source><volume>14</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>19</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-or-29-06-2133"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamada</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Imaoka</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Masunaga</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Recent advances in the biology of heavy-ion cancer therapy</article-title><source>J Radiat Res</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>383</lpage><year>2010</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-or-29-06-2133"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagasawa</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Little</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of tumor promoters, protease inhibitors, and repair processes on X-ray-induced sister chromatid exchanges in mouse cells</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>1943</fpage><lpage>1947</lpage><year>1979</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-or-29-06-2133"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Terasima</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tolmach</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Changes in X-ray sensitivity of HeLa cells during the division cycle</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>190</volume><fpage>1210</fpage><lpage>1211</lpage><year>1961</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-or-29-06-2133"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Endo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Minohara</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Biophysical characteristics of HIMAC clinical irradiation system for heavy-ion radiation therapy</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>44</volume><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-or-29-06-2133"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kanai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsufuji</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyamoto</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Examination of GyE system for HIMAC carbon therapy</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>656</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-or-29-06-2133"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsufuji</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukumura</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Komori</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kohno</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of fragment reaction of relativistic heavy charged particles on heavy-ion radiotherapy</article-title><source>Phys Med Biol</source><volume>48</volume><fpage>1605</fpage><lpage>1623</lpage><year>2003</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-or-29-06-2133"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsufuji</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanematsu</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Specification of carbon ion dose at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS)</article-title><source>J Radiat Res</source><volume>48</volume><issue>Suppl A</issue><fpage>A81</fpage><lpage>A86</lpage><year>2007</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-or-29-06-2133"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogakou</surname><given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>Boon</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Redon</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonner</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo</article-title><source>J Cell Biol</source><volume>146</volume><fpage>905</fpage><lpage>915</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-or-29-06-2133"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogakou</surname><given-names>EP</given-names></name><name><surname>Boon</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonner</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Formation of a novel histone derivative, H2AX phosphorylated on serine-139, is an immediate cellular response to non-lethal and lethal amounts of ionizing radiation, and is also found during apoptosis and in germ cells</article-title><source>Mol Biol Cell</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1858</fpage><lpage>1858</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-or-29-06-2133"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banath</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>MacPhail</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Olive</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radiation sensitivity, H2AX phosphorylation, and kinetics of repair of DNA strand breaks in irradiated cervical cancer cell lines</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>7144</fpage><lpage>7149</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-or-29-06-2133"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuhne</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Riballo</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Rief</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Rothkamm</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeggo</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lobrich</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity</article-title><source>Cancer Res</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>508</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-or-29-06-2133"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagasawa</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Weil</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name><name><surname>Little</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Bedford</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Levels of gamma-H2AX foci after low-dose-rate irradiation reveal a DNA DSB rejoining defect in cells from human ATM heterozygotes in two at families and in another apparently normal individual</article-title><source>Radiat Res</source><volume>166</volume><fpage>443</fpage><lpage>453</lpage><year>2006</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-or-29-06-2133"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Pantelias</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Iliakis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of radiosensitization by halogenated pyrimidines: the contribution of excess DNA and chromosome damage in BrdU radiosensitization may be minimal in plateau-phase cells</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>133</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><year>1994</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-or-29-06-2133"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prise</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Folkard</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>BD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effect of radiation quality on lesion complexity in cellular DNA</article-title><source>Int J Radiat Biol</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>537</fpage><lpage>542</lpage><year>1994</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-or-29-06-2133"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chapman</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Doern</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Reuvers</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Radioprotection by DMSO of mammalian cells exposed to X-rays and to heavy charged-particle beams</article-title><source>Radiat Environ Biophys</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><year>1979</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b43-or-29-06-2133"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Craise</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mei</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Tobias</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neoplastic cell transformation by heavy charged particles</article-title><source>Radiat Res Suppl</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>S177</fpage><lpage>S187</lpage><year>1985</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b44-or-29-06-2133"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fukumura</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsujii</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamada</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Carbon-ion radiotherapy: clinical aspects and related dosimetry</article-title><source>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</source><volume>137</volume><fpage>149</fpage><lpage>155</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Clonogenic survival curves for different radiation qualities and BrdU incorporation. (A) X-rays, (B) LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, (C) LET 70 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, (D) LET 200 keV/&#x003BC;m iron ions. &#x02666;, No BrdU substitution; &#x00394;, unifilar substitution; &#x025A1;, bifilar substitution. Three to five independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the means. Error bars smaller than symbols are not visible. Curves were drawn by GraphPad Prism 5 with linear quadratic regression.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-29-06-2133-g00.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>&#x003B3;-H2AX focus formation assay. (A) X-rays, (B) LET 13 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, (C) LET 70 keV/&#x003BC;m carbon ions, (D) LET 200 keV/&#x003BC;m iron ions. &#x02666;, No BrdU substitution; &#x00394;, unifilar substitution; &#x025A1;, bifilar substitution. Half-life and standard error of the means are shown. Three to four independent experiments were carried out. Error bars indicate standard error of the means. Error bars smaller than symbols are not visible. <sup>&#x0002A;</sup>Statistical significance (P&lt;0.05, t-test) between 0 and 1 cycle and between 0 and 2 cycles of BrdU incorporation.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-29-06-2133-g01.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>RBE values for different qualities of radiation. RBE values were calculated from the dose to achieve 10&#x00025; survival. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-29-06-2133-g02.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>SER values for different qualities of radiation with unifilar (A) or bifilar (B) BrdU substitution. SER values were calculated from the dose to achieve 37&#x00025; survival, which means the average of one lethal dose per population. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-29-06-2133-g03.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between the D<sub>10</sub> and D<sub>37</sub> values and BrdU incorporation for different radiation qualities.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Radiation</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">D<sub>10</sub>, D<sub>37</sub></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">No BrdU</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Unifilar BrdU</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Bifilar BrdU</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">X-ray</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.4 (4.89&#x02013;5.86)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.3 (4.08&#x02013;4.45)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.6 (3.39&#x02013;3.72)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>37</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.1 (2.49&#x02013;3.58)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.3 (2.00&#x02013;2.51)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.9 (1.68&#x02013;2.15)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Carbon ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.9 (4.46&#x02013;5.20)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.1 (3.77&#x02013;4.28)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">3.4 (2.98&#x02013;3.66)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;13 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>37</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.9 (2.16&#x02013;3.33)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.2 (1.80&#x02013;2.50)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.9 (1.48&#x02013;2.30)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Carbon ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.7 (2.47&#x02013;2.96)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.6 (2.46&#x02013;2.68)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.3 (2.20&#x02013;2.36)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;70 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>37</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.5 (1.13&#x02013;1.74)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.4 (1.21&#x02013;1.49)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.1 (1.02&#x02013;1.25)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Iron ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.4 (2.33&#x02013;2.49)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.1 (1.99&#x02013;2.23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.1 (1.97&#x02013;2.24)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;200 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">D<sub>37</sub></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.3 (1.18&#x02013;1.38)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.1 (0.95&#x02013;1.29)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.2 (0.89&#x02013;1.25)</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-or-29-06-2133">
<p>D<sub>10</sub> and D<sub>37</sub> values were calculated from GraphPad Prism 5. Mean and 99&#x00025; confidence interval are shown. Experiments were carried out at least three times to obtain the data.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-or-29-06-2133" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption>
<p>Chromosomal aberration assay in first post-irradiation metaphase following irradiation at G1 phase with BrdU substitutions.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Radiation</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Dose</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">No BrdU</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Unifilar</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Bifilar</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">No irradiation</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05&#x000B1;0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.11&#x000B1;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.15&#x000B1;0.05</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">X-ray</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.30&#x000B1;0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.48&#x000B1;0.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.71&#x000B1;0.04</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"/>
<td align="center" valign="top">2 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.75&#x000B1;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.01&#x000B1;0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.33&#x000B1;0.04</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Carbon ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.42&#x000B1;0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.80&#x000B1;0.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.00&#x000B1;0.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;13 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.06&#x000B1;0.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.56&#x000B1;0.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.93&#x000B1;0.12</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Carbon ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.26&#x000B1;0.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.30&#x000B1;0.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.23&#x000B1;0.09</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;70 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.12&#x000B1;0.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.54&#x000B1;0.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.73&#x000B1;0.37</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Iron ions</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.34&#x000B1;0.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.26&#x000B1;0.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.40&#x000B1;0.47</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x02003;200 keV/&#x003BC;m</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2 Gy</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.84&#x000B1;0.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.68&#x000B1;0.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.70&#x000B1;0.64</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn2-or-29-06-2133">
<p>More than 30 metaphase cells were scored in at least three independent experiments and calculated standard errors of mean.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>
