Introduction
Lung cancer is reported to be the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women worldwide (1,2). Moreover, the reported overall 5-year survival rate is only 15% partially due to the low efficacy of current treatment techniques (1). Thus, novel treatments are urgently needed for this type of cancer. Pathologically almost 80% of all lung cancer cases are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have been found to exist in a large number of NSCLCs (3). With the development of its research, CAFs have been proven to promote tumor progression, metastasis and resistance to therapy through paracrine effects in most solid tumors (4,5). Soluble factors secreted from CAFs include TGF-β family members, EGF family members, chemokines and many other molecules. Among all these factors, stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), which is expressed at elevated level in CAFs, was discovered to perform an important role in tumor cell survival, metastasis and chemoresistance through activation of its receptor, CXCR4 (4). However, how SDF-1 functions during the interaction between CAFs and lung cancer cells is not yet completely clear.
Chemokine receptors are one type of seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors. They are classified into four different groups as CXC, CX3C, CC and XC according to the chemokines they primarily interact with for signaling (6). CXCR4, one member of the chemokine receptor family, has been found to be overexpressed in more than 23 different types of cancers including lung, prostate and breast cancer as well as leukemia (6,7). It exerts its function in tumor cell survival, metastasis and therapeutic resistance mainly through the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB axis as well as the ERK1/2/NF-κB axis after interaction with its ligand SDF-1 (8). Meanwhile, activation of NF-κB has been linked to tumor cell survival and cancer therapy resistance partially through regulating the expression level of Bcl-xL, one member of the anti-apoptotic genes (9). However, whether NF-κB and Bcl-xL are involved in the interaction between CAFs and lung cancer cells is not quite certain.
Although SDF-1 as well as many other soluble factors are highly expressed in CAFs, the molecular mechanisms controlling their expression levels are unclear. MicroRNAs, since firstly discovered in 1993, have been reported to play important roles in many aspects of cell biology, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle and carcinogenesis (10). Numerous studies have demonstrated that the expression of microRNAs in tumors are either upregulated or downregulated compared with their expression level in normal tissues (11). Downregulation of microRNAs has been discovered to be related with tumor suppression. As one of the tumor-suppressing microRNAs, mir-1 was found to be consistently expressed at a very low level in many tumors including lung cancer (12), which was consistent with our data shown in Fig. 2C. Moreover, mir-1 was found to directly regulate the expression of SDF-1 and CXCR4 in thyroid cancer (13). However, whether mir-1 targets SDF-1 in CAFs and affects its role in the interaction between CAFs and lung cancer cells has not yet been reported. Therefore, in the present study, by employing lung cancer cell lines A549 and 95D and isolation of primary CAFs, we investigated the involvement of SDF-1 in the interaction between CAFs and lung cancer cell lines and demonstrated that SDF-1 was able to activate NF-κB and Bcl-xL by interacting with CXCR4 in the A549 and 95D cells. Furthermore, in our experiments, mir-1 was confirmed to negatively regulate the expression of SDF-1. In conclusion, we discovered that by secretion of SDF-1, which was regulated by mir-1, CAFs were able to enhance cell proliferation and the drug resistance to cisplatin in the A549 and 95D cells. These results also suggest CAFs as a potential therapeutic target in tumor treatment.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM):nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from GE Healthcare HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). Rabbit anti-human fibroblast activation protein (FAP), mouse anti-human α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), mouse anti-human CXCR4, mouse anti-human NF-κB and rabbit anti-human β-actin antibodies were provided by Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Mouse anti-human α-SMA and rabbit anti-human Bcl-xL antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Goat anti-mouse IgG/HRP, goat anti-rabbit IgG/HRP, FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and TRITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from KPL, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All primers for mir-1, SDF-1α, α-SMA, FAP, U6 and GAPDH as well as the sequence of CXCR4 siRNA and mir-1 mimics were synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). Human CXCR4 plasmid was constructed by Yrbio (Changsha, China).
Primary lung cancer CAF and normal fibroblast (NF) cultures
Lung cancer and normal lung tissues were obtained from patients with lung cancer after obtaining informed written contents. Normal lung tissues were collected from the same patients at locations at least 5 cm away from the tumor sites. Both types of tissues were kept in DMEM/F12 supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (50 µg/ml). Primary cell isolation was performed within 2 h after excision. Briefly, lung cancer and normal lung tissues were cut into small pieces with a size of ~1 mm3 and planted in cell culture flasks. DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (50 µg/ml) were added to the flasks. Seventy-two hours later, the cells outgrew from the explant culture and medium was changed gently. Then, afterwards, the medium was changed twice a week. Subculture was performed when cells reached 80% confluency at the split ratio of 1:3.
Immunofluorescence staining
CAFs and NFs at passages 2–4 were seeded on coverslips in a 24-well plate on the day before staining. On the next day, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. After permeabilization with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 5 min, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies to FAP and α-SMA overnight at 4°C. Then, on the second day, FITC and TRITC-labeled secondary antibodies were added after washing for 3 times with 1X PBS and kept for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the coverslips were mounted on microslides and examinated under an inverted fluorescence microscope. Images were captured under a magnification of ×200.
MTT assay
Ten microliters of MTT (5 mg/ml) were added into 96-well plates with cells at 5,000 cells/well and incubated for 4 h in cell incubators at 37°C in the absence of light. Then, culture medium was gently damped and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to stop the reaction. Optical densities (ODs) were measured with a microplate reader at 490 nm.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
The secretion of SDF-1 from CAFs and NFs into culture medium was measure by SDF-1α (human) ELISA kit (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan). CAFs and NFs were maintained in T-25 culture flasks. When cells reached confluency, the medium was replenished with 5 ml fresh medium. Twenty-four hours later, the culture supernatant was collected and kept at −80°C before measurement. All steps were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions.
CXCR4 overexpression and silencing
CXCR4 upregulation or downregulation in the A549 and 95D cells were carried out with CXCR4 plasmids or CXCR4 siRNA transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 in a 6-well plate, respectively. The sequences of CXCR4 siRNA were: 5′-GGGACUAUGACUCCAUGAATTUUCAUGGAGUCAUAGUCCCTT-3′. All steps were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. Western blotting was used to evaluate the transfection efficacy 24 h after transfection.
Assessment of cell proliferation
The cell proliferation rate of the A549 and 95D cells after CXCR4 overexpression and silencing was measured with MTT assay. Cells were divided into 3 groups: cells only, cells + CXCR4 (CXCR4-overexpressing cells) and cells + CXCR4 siRNA (CXCR4-silenced cells). Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were seeded into a 96-well plate, and MTT assay was carried out 24, 48 and 72 h after cells were seeded.
The cell proliferation rate of the A549 and 95D cells after incubation with CAFs or addition of the CAF supernatant was assessed with the MTT assay. In the present study, AMD3100, one type of CXCR4 inhibitor and recombinant human chemokine SDF-1 were used to verify their effect on the proliferation rate of the A549 and 95D cells. The cells in the present study were divided into groups as follows: cells only, cells + CAF supernatant, cells + 10 ng/ml SDF-1, cells + CAFs co-culture, and cells + CAFs co-culture + 10 µg/ml AMD3100. A549 or 95D cells were seeded into a 96-well plate 24 h before co-culturing with CAFs or addition of SDF-1, AMD3100 or CAF supernatant. Afterwards, MTT assay was carried out 24, 48 and 72 h, later.
Assessment of the drug resistance to cisplatin
Drug resistance of the A549 and 95D cells after CXCR4 overexpression and silencing was measured using the MTT assay. The cells were divided into 3 groups: cells only, cells + CXCR4 (CXCR4-overexpressing cells) and cells + CXCR4 siRNA (CXCR4-silenced cells). Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were seeded into a 96-well plate, and cisplatin was added on the next day. Concentrations of cisplatin applied in the present study were 0, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 and 7.2 µg/ml. MTT assay was carried out 24 h after cisplatin was added. Cell viability at the concentration of 0 µg/ml was set as 100%; cell viability at all other concentrations was calculated accordingly.
The drug resistance of the A549 and 95D cells after incubation with the CAFs or addition of the CAF supernatant was tested using the MTT assay. In the present study, AMD3100, one type of CXCR4 inhibitor and recombinant human chemokine SDF-1 were used to verify their effect on the drug resistance of the A549 and 95D cells. The cells in the present study were divided into groups as follows: cells only, cells + CAF supernatant, cells + 10 ng/ml SDF-1, cells + CAFs co-culture, and cells + CAFs co-culture +10 µg/ml AMD3100. A549 or 95D cells were seeded into a 96-well plate 24 h before co-culturing with CAFs or the addition of SDF-1, AMD3100 or CAF supernatant. Cisplatin was added also on the next day after cells were seeded. Concentrations of cisplatin applied in the present study were 0, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 3.6 and 7.2 µg/ml. MTT assay was carried out 24 h after cisplatin was added. Cell viability at the concentration of 0 µg/ml was set as 100%; cell viability at all other concentrations was calculated, accordingly.
MicroRNA mir-1 overexpression
The expression level of mir-1 in CAFs was elevated by transient mir-1 mimic transfection with Lipofectamine 2000 in a 6-well plate. The duplex sequences of mir-1 mimics were: sense, 5′-ACAUACUUCUUUACAUUCCATT-3′ and antisense, 5′-UGGAAUGUAAAGAAGUAUGUAU-3′. All steps were carried out according to the manufacturer′s instructions. Quantitative PCR was utilized to evaluate the transfection efficacy 24 and 48 h after transfection.
Quantative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using TRIzol reagent and used for cDNA synthesis. mir-1 reverse transcription was conducted with a microRNA-specific primer using the miScript Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For mRNA reverse transcription, total RNA was reverse transcribed with the SuperScript Reverse Transcription kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR-Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The following primers were used: mir-1-forward, 5′-CTG TCACTCGAGCTGCTGGAATG-3′ and mir-1-reverse, 5′-ACCGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGCAATT-3′; SDF-1α-forward, 5′-CCAAACTGTGCCCTTCAGAT-3′ and SDF-1α-reverse, 5′-CTTTAGCTTCGGGTCAATGC-3′; α-SMA-forward, 5′-AGCTACCCGCCCAGAAACTA-3′ and α-SMA-reverse, 5′-ATGATGCCGTGCTCGATAGG-3′; FAP-forward, 5′-TGTGCATTGTCTTACGCCCT-3′ and FAP-reverse, 5′-GAGTATCTCCAAAGCATGGTTCTA-3′; GAPDH-forward, 5′-CCAGGTGGTCTCCTCTGA-3 and GAPDH-reverse, 5′-GCTGTAGCCAAATCGTTGT-3′; U6-forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ and U6-reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′. The mRNA expression values were normalized to GAPDH. The microRNA expression values were normalized to U6. Relative expression levels of microRNA or mRNA were analyzed using the Bio-Rad C1000 Thermal Cycler.
Western blotting
Whole-cell protein was extracted with protein lysis solution [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 0.5% sodiumdeoxycholate and 0.5% Triton X-100] on ice. Protease inhibitors were added into the cellular lysate. The protein concentration was measured using a bicinchoninic acid assay. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (14) using the following antibodies: mouse anti-human CXCR4, mouse anti-human NF-κB, rabbit anti-human Bcl-xL and rabbit anti-human β-actin antibodies. Briefly, equal amounts of protein (50 ng) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or mouse IgG was used as a secondary antibody. Bound fragments were detected with ECL chemiluminescence kit (Pierce) and exposed on X-film.
Statistical analysis
The Student's t-test was applied to analyze statistical differences between two groups. p<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Each test data from independent experiments were repeated at least 3 times.
Results
Isolation and culture of CAFs and NFs
To investigate the effect of CAFs on the drug resistance of lung cancer, we isolated CAFs and NFs from lung cancer and normal lung tissues of the same patient following written content. Since CAFs and NFs display similar spindle-like morphology in culture, we carried out immunofluorescence staining and quantitative PCR to compare the expression level of α-SMA and FAP. CAFs exhibited a higher amount of α-SMA at the mRNA (Fig. 1B) and protein level (Fig. 1A) than NFs, whereas there were no significant differences in FAP expression at the mRNA (Fig. 1B) and protein level (Fig. 1A) between CAFs and NFs. Meanwhile, we also compared the expression and secretion of SDF-1α from CAF and NFs. Data in Fig. 2A showed that CAFs transcribed much more SDF-1 mRNA than NFs. Furthermore, ELISA data indicated that the concentration of SDF-1α in the CAF culture supernatant was 9.53 ng/ml, while that in the NF culture supernatant was only 3.23 ng/ml (Fig. 2B). Local NFs are considered to be one origin of CAFs. The expression of α-SMA and SDF-1α is significantly upregulated during transformation from NFs to activated CAFs (15). Taken together, these results imply that CAFs derived from patients with lung cancer may be reprogrammed from local NFs and exert their functions via secretion of SDF-1α.
Effects of CXCR4 on cell proliferation and drug resistance of A549 and 95D cells
To illuminate the function of CXCR4 in the cell proliferation and drug resistance of A549 and 95D cells, we performed CXCR4 plasmid transfection and CXCR4 siRNA transfection to upregulate and downregulate its expression level in A549 and 95D cells, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, CXCR4 upregulation elevated the cell proliferation rate of the A549 and 95D cells, whereas CXCR4 silencing had exactly the opposite effects. Simultaneously, chemoresistance of A549 and 95D to cisplatin (CDDP) was enhanced or suppressed as the CXCR4 expression level was increased or decreased, respectively (Fig. 3C and D). As reported, CXCR4 plays a role in tumor cell growth, survival and drug resistance mainly through the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB axis as well as the ERK1/2/NF-κB axis (8). Meanwhile, NF-κB activation or upregulation usually leads to transcriptional activation of genes such as Bcl-xL to suppress apoptosis (9). Therefore, western blotting was utilized to reveal the involvement of Bcl-xL and NF-κB during CXCR4 overexpression and silencing. As demonstrated in Fig. 3E and F, we obtained similar data from the A549 and 95D cells. The protein levels of Bcl-xL and NF-κB were both escalated as CXCR4 was overexpressed, while their protein levels were both declined as CXCR4 was silenced. These data indicated that, in the A549 and 95D cells, activation of NF-κB and Bcl-xL could be possible signaling transduction factors for CXCR4 to promote its role in cell proliferation and drug resistance.
Effects of CAFs on cell proliferation and drug resistance of A549 and 95D cells
To reveal the effects of CAFs on cell proliferation and drug resistance of A549 and 95D, a Transwell-base co-culture system and CAF culture supernatant were applied to the A549 and 95D cells, respectively. As in the Transwell-base co-culture system, A549 and 95D cells were seeded in 96-well plates at the concentration of 5,000/well, and CAFs were seeded in the inserts at the concentration of 5,000/well, as well. As shown in Fig. 4A and B, the OD values of the 95D and A549 cells were both increased after co-culture with the CAFs. Moreover, cell viability of the 95D and A549 cells in the cisplatin suspension was also increased after co-culture with the CAFs. CAFs are routinely cultivated in T25 flasks. When they reached confluency, which was ~1×106 in each flask according to our counting, the culture medium was replaced with 5 ml fresh medium. Twenty-four hours later, the culture supernatant was collected. With the addition of the CAF culture supernatant, the OD values of the 95D and A549 cells were also increased compared with that in the control group (Fig. 4A and B). Meanwhile, the cell viability of the 95D and A549 cells in cisplatin suspension was increased with the addition of the CAF culture supernatant as well (Fig. 4C and D). The data we obtained using co-culture techniques and supernatant were consistent with each other. As reported, CAFs are capable of affecting tumor growth, survival and chemoresistance by secretion of TGF-β1, SDF-1 and other small molecules (5). To verify the involvement of SDF-1 in the present study, we simultaneously assessed the effects of SDF-1α on the cell proliferation and drug resistance of the A549 and 95D cells. As indicated by the data in Fig. 4, SDF-1α exhibited capability similar to the CAF culture supernatant as well as the CAF co-culture system. Furthermore, we added CXCR4 inhibitor-AMD3100 to test whether or not CXCR4 was involved. As hypothesized, 10 µg/ml AMD3100 attenuated the cell viability of the A549 and 95D cells in the cisplatin suspension and slowed down the cell proliferation rate of the A549 and 95D cells compared with all other groups. These data indicate that the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis played an important role in the effects of CAFs on the cell proliferation and drug resistance of the A549 and 95D cells.
Effects of CAFs on signaling transductions in the A549 and 95D cells
To elucidate the signaling passways in A549 and 95D cells that are influenced by the paracrine effect of CAFs, we compared the protein levels of NF-κB and Bcl-xL among the groups by western blotting. As shown in Fig. 5, the CAF supernatant and CAF co-culture system had similar effects on the expression of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL. The protein level of CXCR4 was increased by addition of the CAF supernatant as well as co-culture with CAFs. In addition, subsequently, the expression levels of NF-κB and Bcl-xL were both upregulated. To confirm the participation of SDF-1, we also measured the expression level of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL after addition of recombinant human SDF-1. As indicated in Fig. 5A and B, the protein levels of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL were all elevated by direct addition of 10 ng/ml SDF-1 into the cell culture of A549 and 95D. Furthermore, we also assessed the expression of Bcl-xL and NF-κB after blocking the activation of CXCR4 with AMD3100. As shown in Fig. 5C and D, both Bcl-xL and NF-κB were downregulated following the addition of 10 µg/ml AMD3100 into the cell culture of A549 and 95D. Taken together, these above data suggested that upregulation of NF-κB and Bcl-xL through the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis could be the molecular mechanisms behind the paracrine effects of CAFs on the A549 and 95D cells.
Regulation of mir-1 on SDF-1 synthesis in CAFs and its subsequent effects on downstream signaling transduction in A549 and 95D cells
mir-1, as a tumor-suppressor microRNA, was reported to be expressed at a very low level in lung cancer and other cancer types (12). SDF-1 was identified as one of its targets in head and neck tumors (13). In the present study, we upregulated mir-1 expression in the CAFs by mir-1 mimic transfection (Fig. 6A). In addition, consequently, the expression level of SDF-1 was decreased as indicated in Fig. 6B. We also detected the expression levels of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL in the A549 and 95D cells after co-culture with mir-1-overexpressing CAFs. As demonstrated by the data in Fig. 6C and D, the protein levels of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL in the A549 and 95D cells declined after co-culture with the mir-1-overexpressing CAFs, although changes were not apparently time-dependent. These results revealed that mir-1 negatively regulated the expression of SDF-1 and that mir-1 overexpression consequently downregulated the expression of CXCR4, NF-κB and Bcl-xL in the A549 and 95D cells by co-culturing with mir-1-upregulated CAFs.
Discussion
The tumor microenvironment plays an important role in cancer development and progression. CAFs, the dominant component of the tumor microenvironment, have been shown to be crucial for tumor cell proliferation, survival and therapeutic resistance (4). In this present study, we first isolated CAFs from patient tissues and demonstrated that they promoted cell proliferation and chemoresistance to cisplatin in lung cancer cell lines A549 and 95D in a paracrine manner. Secondly, using ELISA and quantitative PCR, we found that a higher amount of SDF-1 existed in the CAFs when compared with that in the NFs. Thirdly, we found that SDF-1 facilitated lung cancer cell proliferation and drug resistance via the CXCR4-mediated signaling passway which involved NF-κB and Bcl-xL. Moreover, we also confirmed that the expression level of SDF-1 in CAFs was negatively regulated by microRNA mir-1.
CAFs are heterogeneous and poorly defined to date. α-SMA, FAP, vimentin and many other markers have been reported to characterize them (16). In the present study, we employed α-SMA and FAP. As shown in our results, α-SMA and FAP were both highly expressed in the CAFs, which indicated that lung cancer CAFs may resemble myofibroblasts since co-expression of α-SMA and FAP is characteristic of myofibroblasts (4). However, we also found that FAP was expressed in NFs and no significant difference at the mRNA level was detected between NFs and CAFs. Meanwhile, a higher expression level of SDF-1 was observed in the CAFs when compared with that in the NFs. Therefore, α-SMA and SDF-1 may be superior markers of lung cancer CAFs than FAP.
Therapeutic resistance of lung cancer, particularly NSCLC, is mainly due to improved survival ability of cells and metastasis (1). Numerous studies have established the correlation between CXCR4 expression and poor prognosis in NSCLC. CXCR4 overexpression was reported to be associated with poor survival in stage IV NSCLC patients (17). In our results, elevated CXCR4 expression in lung cancer cell lines A549 and 95D promoted cell proliferation and drug resistance to cisplatin. The protein levels of NF-κB and Bcl-xL were found to be increased in the CXCR4-overexpressing A549 and 95D cells as well as in tumor cells co-cultured with CAFs. Furthermore, co-culture with the CAFs also induced upregulation of CXCR4 expression in the A549 and 95D cells, which was attenuated by addition of AMD3100. In previous studies by other research groups, NF-κB was found to suppress apoptosis by activating TRAF1 and TRAF2, as well as bcl-2 homologues A1/Bfl-1 and Bcl-xL (9). Moreover, NF-κB was also found to be involved in cell growth and angiogenesis by regulating the expression of ICAM-1 and Cox-2 (9). Taken together, our data may provide explanations for the correlation between CXCR4 expression and the poor outcome of lung cancer and offer evidence for the potential therapeutic application of targeting CAFs or the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis.
MicroRNAs exert their regulatory role in a variety of biological process. Recently, they have been demonstrated to function as oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes in many types of cancers. mir-1 as well as mir-148 have been identified as tumor suppressors (10,11,18). Both were discovered to be expressed at a very low level in many types of tumors including lung cancer. mir-148 was reported to suppress metastasis and mir-1 was found to be involved in tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and apoptosis (10,18). However, not much is known concerning their functions in CAFs. In the present study, mir-1 expression in lung cancer CAFs was measured, which was lower than that in the NFs. Our data also indicated that mir-1 negatively regulates the expression of SDF-1, which plays an important role during the interaction between CAFs and tumor cells. Thus, microRNA expression was altered in CAF formation and affected CAF functions. Meanwhile, to the best of our knowledge, this was the first study to report the function of mir-1 in lung cancer CAFs. In the future, more research is warranted to obtain a better understanding of the functions of mirRNAs in CAFs, in particular in the whole tumor microenvironment.
In summary, we discovered that CAFs were capable of influencing the cell proliferation and drug resistance of A549 and 95D cells by SDF-1 secretion. In addition, SDF-1 upregulated the expression of CXCR4 which subsequently elevated the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-xL. Meanwhile, microRNA mir-1 mediated the expression of SDF-1 in the CAFs. Conclusively, we revealed a mir-1/SDF-1/CXCR4/NF-κB/Bcl-xL signaling pathway behind the interaction between CAFs and the lung cancer cell lines, which explains the reason why CAFs increased the proliferation rate and drug resistance capacities of the A549 and 95D cells. These results also identify CAFs as a potential therapeutic target in tumor treatment.