Human NSCLC cell lines (A549 and NCI-H1299) were purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and incubated in 5% CO₂ at 37°C.

Cells were cultured to 40–50% confluency and transiently transfected with 50 nM miRNA negative control (miR-NC), or miRNA mimics using HiPerFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For RNAi experiments, siRNAs were also transfected using HiperFect Transfection Reagent at a final concentration of 50 nM. miRNA mimics and NC were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China), and siRNAs were purchased from RiboBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

For the migration assay, 2×10⁴ transfected A549 or H1299 cells were seeded in the top chamber of the Transwell insert (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA). For the invasion assay, 3×10⁵ transfected A549 or 1×10⁵ transfected H1299 cells were seeded in the top chamber of the insert (BD Biosciences), which had previously been coated with 100 µl diluted Matrigel (Corning, Corning, NY, USA). After 20–24 h of incubation at 37°C, the cells that had migrated or invaded through the insert were fixed with 100% methanol, stained with 0.1% crystal violet and counted.

Total RNA containing miRNAs was isolated from cells using miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). For single-stranded complementary DNA synthesis, 500 ng total RNA was reverse-transcribed using PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China). Real-time PCR was performed using UltraSYBR Mixture (CWBio, Beijing, China) and LC 480 PCR System (Roche). Primers for integrin β1 (ITGB1), KRAS, FOXM1 and GAPDH are shown in Table I. The expression levels of mRNA were normalized to the endogenous control GAPDH, using the 2^−ΔΔCt method.

Cells were lysed using cell lysis buffer for western blot analysis and IP with protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20, and then incubated with corresponding primary antibody. Primary antibodies against GAPDH (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used at a dilution of 1:10,000, against E-cadherin and vimentin (VIM) at a dilution of 1:1,000, and against ITGB1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a dilution of 1:2,000. Secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (anti-mouse IgG and anti-rabbit IgG) were used to detect primary antibodies. For HRP detection, an ECL chemiluminescence kit (CWBio) was used.

The wild-type 3 untranslated region (3′UTR) of ITGB1 and its target-site mutant 3′UTR were amplified by PCR. The PCR products were then cloned into the XhoI/NotI site of the psiCHECK-2 dual-luciferase reporter plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). These vectors were named ITGB1-3′UTR, ITGB1-3′UTRm1, ITGB1-3′UTRm2 and ITGB1-3′UTRm1+2, respectively. To perform luciferase reporter assays, A549 and H1299 cells were plated into 96-well plates and co-transfected with the reporter vector and 50 nM miR-NC or miR-134 mimics using Attractene Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). Forty-eight hours after transfection, Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter System (Promega).

Lentiviral vector expressing ITGB1 or an empty lentiviral vector was purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). Cell infection was performed following the manufacturer's protocol. Cells stably overexpressing ITGB1 or the empty vector were selected by puromycin (2 µg/ml). A549 and H1299 cells that stably expressed the empty vector or ITGB1 were designated A549-control and H1299-control, or A549-ITGB1 and H1299-ITGB1.

Rescue experiments were carried out to determine whether ITGB1 mediates the suppression effects on migration and invasion mediated by miR-134. A549-control, A549-ITGB1, H1299-control and H1299-ITGB1 cells were transfected with miR-NC or miR-134 mimics, and then the Transwell assays were performed.

To establish a lung cancer xenograft model, 2×10⁶ A549 cells in 100 µl phosphate-buffered saline were subcutaneously injected intox the right hind limb of BALB/c nude mice [female, 4–5 weeks old, purchased from Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd. (Beijing China)]. After 10 days, when the diameter of the tumor reached ~5-6 mm, the nude mice were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=4 each). miR-134 agomir or negative control (NC) agomir (RiboBio Co., Ltd.) was then directly injected into the implanted tumor at the dose of 5 nmol/mouse every 3 days for 5 times. Tumor volume (V) was monitored every 3 days since the first day of injection of agomir. Forty-eight hours after the last injection, animals were sacrificed and tumor tissues were resected. Lung tissues were also collected for inspection. Mice were manipulated and housed according to protocols approved by the Shandong Hospital Experimental Animal Care Commission.

Tumor tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5-µm thick) were cut from the embedded tissues and mounted on polylysine-coated slides. Tumor sections were subjected to IHC staining for detection of E-cadherin, VIM and ITGB1. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in gradient alcohol and treated with 0.3% H₂O₂ for 15 min to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Following antigen retrieval, sections were blocked in 10% normal serum with 1% BSA in TBS for 2 h at room temperature, and then incubated at 4°C overnight with the corresponding primary antibodies (E-cadherin, VIM and ITGB1; Abcam). Negative controls were incubated with the negative control antibody under the same condition. Next, the sections were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody for 1 h, followed by incubation with conjugated horseradish peroxidase streptavidin for 1 h. Finally, the sections were incubated with diaminobenzidine and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Experiments were performed at least three times. Data were analyzed by Student's t-test when comparing two groups and by one-way ANOVA followed Bonferronis post-test, when comparing more than two groups. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.

We chose NSCLC cell lines A549 and H1299 to investigate migration as well as invasion due to their innate aggressiveness. As shown in Fig. 1, miR-134 significantly inhibited the migration as well as the invasion of the A549 and H1299 cells. Overexpression of miR-134 in the A549 cells resulted in ~45 and 75% reduction in the number of migratory and invasive cells, respectively, while in the H1299 cells, migratory and invasive cells were decreased 60 and 30%, respectively, in the cells transfected with miR-134 compared with cells transfected with the miR-NC.

EMT is an important process that increases the aggressiveness and metastatic potential of cancer cells. After revealing the suppressive roles of migration as well as invasion by miR-134, we aimed to ascertain whether or not this suppression was related to EMT inhibition. Thus, we detected the alteration in expression of two essential molecules participating in EMT: E-cadherin (epithelial marker) and VIM (mesenchymal marker). As shown in Fig. 2A, in the A549 cells, miR-134 increased the expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin, and decreased the expression of mesenchymal marker VIM; in H1299 cells, there was no E-cadherin detected, while the expression of VIM was significantly suppressed. These data indicated that miR-134 inhibited EMT in NSCLC cells, which may be partly responsible for suppression of migration and invasion by miR-134.

Although we demonstrated that miR-134 inhibited EMT of NSCLC cells, neither E-cadherin nor VIM was found to be the predicted target of miR-134. Thus, we were motivated to identify potential targets. Through integrating both target prediction as well as literature review, we focused our attention on the following 3 pertinent oncogenes, KRAS, FOXM1 and ITGB1, which have been confirmed as authentic targets of miR-134. qRT-PCR suggested that ITGB1 showed the most significant decrease after miR-134 transfection (Fig. 2B). Therefore, we chose ITGB1 for further western blotting validation. As shown in Fig. 2C, western blotting confirmed the downregulation of ITGB1.

To determine whether downregulation of the ITGB1 expression levels are due to direct targeting of miR-134 to the ITGB1-3′UTR, we constructed reporter vectors containing wild-type (ITGB1-3′UTR) and target-site mutant (ITGB1-3′UTRm1, ITGB1-3′UTRm2 and ITGB1-3′UTRm1+2) 3′UTR of ITGB1 respectively to perform luciferase reporter assay in the A549 and H1299 cells (Fig. 3A). Compared with miR-NC, co-transfection of miR-134 and ITGB1-3′UTR showed significantly decreased luciferase activity, whereas co-transfection of miR-134 and ITGB1-3′UTRm1+2 did not result in significant reduction in luciferase activity. Co-transfection of miR-134 and ITGB1-3′UTRm1 or ITGB1-3′UTRm2 also resulted in reduced luciferase activity; however, the degree of reduction was less than the co-transfection of miR-134 and ITGB1-3′UTR (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that both target sites in ITGB1-3′UTR are targeted by miR-134, and the second target site is more potent than the first one.

To determine whether miR-134 exerts its suppressive functions on migration and invasion through downregulation of ITGB1, we performed RNAi and rescue experiments. RNAi experiment confirmed that knockdown of ITGBI significantly inhibited EMT, cell migration and invasion, mimicking the phenotype of miR-134 overexpression (Fig. 4A and B). In the functional rescue experiments, we constructed ITGB1-overexpressing A549 and H1299 cells using a lentiviral vector (A549-ITGB1 and H1299-ITGB1), in which the 3′UTR of ITGB1 was missing. ITGB1 overexpression was confirmed by western blotting. While miR-134 inhibited ITGB1 expression in the A549 and H1299 cells transfected with the lentiviral-vector control (A549-control and H1299-control), no significant downregulation of ITGB1 was detected in the A549-ITGB1 and H1299-ITGB1 cells (Fig. 4C). In the A549-ITGB1 and H1299-ITGB1 cells, the suppressive effects on tumor migration and invasion of miR-134 were abolished (Fig. 4D), suggesting that ITGB1 is a functional target of miR-134.

To investigate whether miR-134 inhibits NSCLC cell metastasis in vivo, we constructed an A549 lung cancer xenograft model, and treated the mice with an intro-tumor injection of miR-134 agomir or NC agomir. miR-134 agomir treatment significantly inhibited A549 xenograft growth (data not shown). However, at the time of sacrifice, no metastasis was detected in lung tissues, thus we performed IHC detection of E-cadherin, VIM and ITGB1 as a surrogate to assess the metastatic potential of the tumor cells. As shown in Fig. 5, the expression level of E-cadherin was increased, while the expression levels of VIM and ITGB1 were decreased in the tumors injected with the miR-134 agomir compared to these levels in the tumors injected with NC agomir. These data indicated that miR-134 increased E-cadherin and decreased VIM expression in vivo, which was correlated with decreased EMT and aggressiveness, and downregulated ITGB1 expression, which also suggested decreased invasion in vivo.