<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">OR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Oncology Reports</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1021-335X</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1791-2431</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/or.2018.6225</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">or-39-03-1011</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Actin-capping protein CapG is associated with prognosis, proliferation and metastasis in human glioma</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Yun</surname><given-names>Da-Peng</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yu-Qi</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>De-Long</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Yuan-Yuan</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Ju-Xiang</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Hong-Yan</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="c1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Da-Ru</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="c1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="corresp"/></contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-or-39-03-1011"><label>1</label>State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China</aff>
<aff id="af2-or-39-03-1011"><label>2</label>Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA</aff>
<aff id="af3-or-39-03-1011"><label>3</label>Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Institute of Neurosurgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, P.R. China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-or-39-03-1011"><italic>Correspondence to</italic>: Dr Hong-Yan Chen or Dr Da-Ru Lu, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and MOE Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China, E-mail: <email>chenhy@fudan.edu.cn</email>, E-mail: <email>darulu@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn1-or-39-03-1011"><label>&#x002A;</label><p>Contributed equally</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
<volume>39</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>1011</fpage>
<lpage>1022</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>02</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Yun et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Glioma is the most aggressive and malignant primary brain tumor in adults. In the present study, we identified a vital oncoprotein, capping actin protein, gelsolin-like (CapG), and investigated its roles in the prognosis, proliferation and metastasis in glioma. The mRNA and protein levels of CapG were significantly increased in human glioma, and higher CapG expression was an independent prognostic factor for predicting unfavorable prognosis. The expression level of <italic>CapG</italic> was found to be associated with several common molecular features of glioblastoma (GBM; WHO grade IV glioma) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. When analyzing the prognosis of GBM patients according to these molecular features, we observed that the prognostic value of <italic>CapG</italic> was affected by amplification of <italic>CDK6</italic> or <italic>EGFR</italic>. However, overexpression of CapG markedly promoted cell growth <italic>in vitro</italic>, while depletion of CapG significantly inhibited cell proliferation by blocking the cell cycle in G1/S transition. Moreover, CapG manipulation in glioma cell lines U87 and U251 showed CapG-dependent cellular migration and invasiveness. These data suggest that CapG may serve as a prognostic biomarker with potentially important therapeutic implications for glioma.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>CapG</kwd>
<kwd>glioma</kwd>
<kwd>prognosis</kwd>
<kwd>proliferation</kwd>
<kwd>migration</kwd>
<kwd>invasiveness</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Glioma, accounting for ~80&#x0025; of brain malignancies (<xref rid="b1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>), is the most lethal and aggressive type of brain tumor in adults (<xref rid="b2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). Despite advances in multimodal therapies including surgical resection, radiation and chemotherapy (<xref rid="b3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>), the prognosis of glioma patients remains dismal (<xref rid="b4-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>), with a 5-year survival rate of 4.3&#x0025; (<xref rid="b6-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). Due to the fact that most glioma patients have already developed metastasis or malignant diffusion by the time of diagnosis (<xref rid="b2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>), identifying new prognostic biomarkers and molecular targets for glioma is imperative.</p>
<p>To better understand the pathogenesis of glioma, substantial efforts have been made to investigate molecular subtypes (<xref rid="b7-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="b8-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>) and potential biomarkers correlated with the clinical prognosis (<xref rid="b9-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b12-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>). For example, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (<xref rid="b13-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) database provides researchers an ideal platform to explore tumorigenesis, cancer progression and treatment responses in various types of tumors including GBM (<xref rid="b12-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b14-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b16-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>).</p>
<p>As proliferation and metastasis play a key role in glioma development (<xref rid="b2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>), we focused on potential genes involved in glioma proliferation and metastasis in the present study. Capping actin protein, gelsolin-like (CapG) was first identified as an actin binding protein of the gelsolin superfamily, which is able to modulate actin length by capping barbed ends in a Ca<sup>2&#x002B;</sup>-dependent manner and generate propulsive force (<xref rid="b17-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="b18-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). However, it is involved in the regulation of actin-based cell migration in non-muscle benign cells (<xref rid="b19-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). Moreover, overexpression of CapG has been reported to promote cell motility and increase metastasis in breast cancer and ovarian carcinoma (<xref rid="b20-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>). However, the function and prognosis of CapG in human glioma remain unclear.</p>
<p>In the present study, we first investigated levels of CapG expression in a cohort of Chinese glioma patients by tissue microarray (TMA) and estimated its prognostic value. We then tested the differential expression and prognostic value of <italic>CapG</italic> in an independent cohort from the TCGA dataset. Finally, we assessed the effect of CapG on the proliferation and metastatic ability of glioma cell lines U87 and U251. Our results revealed that CapG is a novel independent prognostic predictor for glioma patients and highlight a key role of CapG in proliferation and metastasis of glioma.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patients and tissue samples</title>
<p>For the Chinese TMA cohort, 285 glioma patients of different WHO grades were recruited between January 2000 and December 2010 from the Department of Neurosurgery at Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University (SMMU) (Shanghai, China). Sixteen normal brain tissue samples were taken from trauma outpatients during decompression treatment. Clinical information was obtained from medical records of the patients. Tumor histology was confirmed by two neuropathologists independently. All participants provided written informed consent. The present study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Second Military Medical University and Fudan University.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Immunohistochemistry and tissue microarray analysis</title>
<p>The tissue microarray construction and immunohistochemistry analyses were performed by Shanghai Biochip Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), as described previously (<xref rid="b21-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>,<xref rid="b22-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>). The immunohistochemical staining was read and scored by two independent pathologists in a blinded fashion. The total immunoreactivity score was the product of the staining scores for density and intensity (<xref rid="b23-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>). High CapG expression, indicating strongly positive cases (&#x002B;), had a score of &#x003E;3, while low expression indicated weakly positive cases (&#x2212;) with a score of &#x2264;3.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Quantitative real-time PCR</title>
<p>Total RNA was extracted from surgically resected tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer&#x0027;s protocol. Reverse transcription of total RNA was performed using ReverTra Ace (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan). The PCR primers are avaiable upon request. Quantitative real-time PCR was run using the ABI Prism 7900HT instruments (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in the presence of Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo). All samples were tested in triplicate and repeated 3 times and melting curve analysis was used to check the specificity of amplification. The 2<sup>&#x2212;&#x0394;&#x0394;Ct</sup> method (<xref rid="b24-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>) was used to calculate relative gene expression.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>In silico analyses of TCGA data</title>
<p>The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (<xref rid="b13-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) cohort (N=528; the Affymetrix platform), an independent dataset of GBM, was included in the present study. For the TCGA cohort, multidimensional data of clinical information, molecular subtypes, copy number alterations, common mutations, methylation levels and gene expression were obtained from the TCGA data portal (<uri xlink:href="http://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/">http://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/</uri>) and cBioPortal (<uri xlink:href="http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/">http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/</uri>), to analyze the expression profile and prognostic significance of the CapG gene, and their correlations with several molecular alterations. In the analyses of the TCGA cohort, CapG gene levels were dichotomized to low and high according to the ROC curve.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell culture and lentivirus infection</title>
<p>U87 and U251 human glioma cell lines were purchased from the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank. The glioma cells were cultured in Dulbecco&#x0027;s modified Eagle&#x0027;s medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) supplemented with 10&#x0025; fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 U/ml). To generate cell lines stably overexpressing CapG, we cloned CapG from cDNA of the U251 cell line by PCR and cloned it into the CD513B plasmid (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) at the <italic>Eco</italic>RI and <italic>Bam</italic>HI restriction sites. To stably interfere with CapG expression, we selected sequences targeting CapG into the <italic>Hpa</italic>I-<italic>Xho</italic>I sites plasmid LentiLox 3.7 (pLL3.7) (data available upon request). However, the shLacZ (<xref rid="b25-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>) and CD513B empty vector (EV) were used as controls for pLL3.7-shCapG and CD513B-CapG, respectively. Lentiviral production and infection were performed as previously described (<xref rid="b26-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Western blotting</title>
<p>The tissue and cell samples were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The lysates were separated on 10 or 12&#x0025; SDS-PAGE gel and electrotransferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). After blocking with 5&#x0025; non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubating with primary antibodies. CapG (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), CDK2, CDK6, Myc, cyclin A1, cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, E2F1, p15, RB and phospho-RB (ProteinTech, Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), the membranes were incubated with the secondary antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA, USA). Anti-GAPDH antibody (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used as a loading control.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cell proliferation assays and cell cycle analysis</title>
<p>Following overexpression or knockdown of CapG, the glioma cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2,000 cells/well) in sextuple, and the cell proliferation assay was performed using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer&#x0027;s instructions. Cell cycle analysis was performed as described previously (<xref rid="b27-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>). Glioma cells were washed with 1&#x03A7; PBS 3 times and fixed with 75&#x0025; ice-cold ethanol. Fixed cells were incubated in 1&#x03A7; PBS with propidium iodide (PI; 25 &#x00B5;g/ml) and 10 mg/ml RNase for 30 min in the dark before being analyzed by flow cytometry. All assays were performed in 3 independent experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Wound healing assays</title>
<p>Cells were cultured to monolayers in 6-well plates and a reference line was drawn at the back of each well. Three scratches were made from one end to the other end of the well with a sterile p200 pipette tip. The width of the wound distance was measured at baseline. The cells were cultured in serum-free medium for 24 and 48 h, respectively. Wound closure rate was expressed as the distance migrated after 24 or 48 h relative to the basic width at 4 h. Migration experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated at least 3 times.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Transwell invasion assays</title>
<p>Cells were suspended in FBS-free DMEM at a concentration of 1&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup> (U87 cells) and 2.5&#x00D7;10<sup>5</sup> (U251 cells) for Transwell invasion assays using BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chambers (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x0027;s instructions. The suspended cells (500 &#x00B5;l) were pipetted into the upper chamber, while the lower chamber was filled with 750 &#x00B5;l DMEM with EGF (15 ng/ml). After 24 h of incubation at 37&#x00B0;C, the filter side of the upper chamber was scrubbed with cotton swabs to remove non-invading cells and Matrigel matrix. The migrated cells were fixed in methanol and stained with crystal violet. Then, the membranes were cut from the chamber and placed on microscope slides for observation. Each invasion condition was performed in triplicates and repeated at least 3 times.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All experiments were conducted in triplicate and are expressed as the means and standard deviation by two-tailed Student&#x0027;s t-test. Analysis of patient survival outcome was conducted by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and SPSS statistics 17.0, respectively (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05, &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001 and &#x2018;ns&#x2019;, not significant).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>CapG is elevated in human glioma tissues</title>
<p>In the present study, a cohort of 285 glioma specimens and 16 normal controls from a Chinese population was enrolled in the TMA. It included 12 grade I (pilocytic astrocytomas), 108 grade II (diffuse astrocytomas), 46 grade III (anaplastic astrocytomas) and 119 grade IV (glioblastomas, GBM) specimens according to the WHO grading schedule. The clinicopathological parameters of the TMA are presented in <xref rid="tI-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>. The patient median overall survival (OS) was 30 months for all glioma cases, with a 5-year survival rate of 4.3&#x0025;. Next, we examined the protein level of CapG by immunohistochemical assay performed on the TMA and observed its cytoplasmic expression in most samples. Furthermore, the immunoreactivity of CapG was significantly increased with WHO grade in the human glioma tissues when compared with normal controls: high grade gliomas (HGG; grade III/grade IV) showed stronger immunoreactivity than the low grade gliomas (LGG, grade I/II) (<xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A and B</xref>).</p>
<p>We then measured the transcriptional level of <italic>CapG</italic> in a subset of 36 human gliomas (16 LGG and 20 HGG specimens) and 16 normal controls via quantitative RT-PCR assay. These samples were randomly selected from the cohort. Consistent with the TMA data, <italic>CapG</italic> was considerably increased in human glioma specimens according to WHO grade (<xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1C</xref>). These results suggest that CapG is frequently elevated in human glioma tissues.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CapG serves as a novel prognostic marker for glioma patients</title>
<p>To further investigate the correlation between CapG expression level and clinical prognosis, we performed Kaplan-Meier analyses and found that glioma patients with higher CapG expression had significantly shorter overall survival (OS, log-rank P=1.142E-06, HR=2.171, 95&#x0025; CI=1.572&#x2013;2.999, <xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1D</xref>) and progression-free survival (PFS, log-rank, P=1.963E-05, HR=1.913, 95&#x0025; CI=1.408&#x2013;2.600, <xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1E</xref>) than those with low expression. Moreover, we observed that HGG patients with higher CapG expression also had an unfavorable OS (log-rank P=0.018, HR=1.501, 95&#x0025; CI=1.067&#x2013;2.225, <xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1F</xref>) and PFS (log-rank P=0.027, HR=1.476, 95&#x0025; CI=1.034&#x2013;2.107, <xref rid="f1-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1G</xref>) than those with low CapG expression.</p>
<p>Next, our univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that high CapG expression was an independent risk predictor of both OS (P=0.003, HR=1.674, 95&#x0025; CI=1.198&#x2013;2.339) and PFS (P=0.008, HR=0.008, 95&#x0025; CI=1.123&#x2013;2.12) in our cohort (<xref rid="tII-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). In addition, we further identified CapG as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P=0.021, HR=1.541, 95&#x0025; CI=1.067&#x2013;2.225) and PFS (P=0.032, HR=1.476, 95&#x0025; CI=1.034&#x2013;2.107) of HGG patients; higher levels of CapG predicted poorer survival (<xref rid="tII-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CapG gene expression is upregulated in GBM specimens and is correlated with several molecular alterations in the TCGA cohort</title>
<p>We next investigated the expression profile of the <italic>CapG</italic> gene in an independent cohort from TCGA (<xref rid="b13-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>). Consequently, mRNA expression of CapG increased in 97.7&#x0025; (516/528) of the GBM specimens compared to the normal controls (<xref rid="f2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2A</xref>). Since TCGA network has introduced a novel molecular classification of GBM according to gene expression, which are proneural, neural, classical and mesenchymal (<xref rid="b28-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>), we then assessed <italic>CapG</italic> expression in each of these subtypes. As shown in <xref rid="f2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2B</xref>, we observed that <italic>CapG</italic> expression was drastically decreased in the proneural subtype in comparison with the others. Nevertheless, <italic>CapG</italic> expression was still elevated in GBM samples.</p>
<p>To further explore the expression profile of the <italic>CapG</italic> gene, we scanned associations between its expression and these common genetic alterations in GBM (<xref rid="b13-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b29-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>) including amplifications of <italic>CDK4</italic>, <italic>CDK6</italic>, <italic>EGFR</italic>, <italic>AKT3</italic>, <italic>PDGFRA</italic>, <italic>MDM2</italic>, <italic>MET</italic>, <italic>MDM4</italic>, <italic>MYCN</italic>, <italic>CCND2</italic>, <italic>PIK3CA</italic>, mutations in <italic>PTEN</italic>, <italic>TP53</italic>, <italic>IDH1</italic>, <italic>EGFR</italic>, <italic>NF1</italic>, <italic>RB1</italic>, <italic>PIK3R1</italic>, <italic>ATRX</italic>, <italic>PIK3CA</italic>, <italic>CTNND2</italic>, <italic>SPTA1</italic>, <italic>GABRA6</italic>, <italic>LZTR1</italic>, and deletions of <italic>PTEN</italic>, <italic>CDKN2A</italic>, <italic>CDKN2B, CDKN2C</italic>, <italic>NF1</italic>, <italic>PARK2</italic>, <italic>RB1</italic>. As a result, we found that <italic>CapG</italic> expression exhibited a correlation with the amplification of <italic>CDK6</italic>, <italic>EGFR</italic>, <italic>MET</italic>, <italic>SYK</italic>, <italic>ANXA1</italic>, <italic>MYCN</italic>, <italic>PDGFRA</italic>, and mutations of <italic>PTEN</italic>, <italic>IDH1</italic>, <italic>RB1</italic>.</p>
<p>Since we ascertained that <italic>CapG</italic> expression is correlated with the GBM subtype, we then explored whether the differential <italic>CapG</italic> expression with the above-mentioned common genetic alterations was dependent on the specific subtype. Consequently, cases with <italic>CDK6</italic> amplification or <italic>EGFR</italic> amplification or <italic>MET</italic> amplification had higher levels of <italic>CapG</italic> expression than those with no copy number alterations in the proneural subtype, while there were no dramatic changes in non-proneural subtypes (<xref rid="f2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2C-E</xref>). Moreover, cases with <italic>SYK</italic> amplification had lower <italic>CapG</italic> expression level than those with no copy number alterations in the proneural subtype, and there was also no obvious change in the non-proneural subtype (<xref rid="f2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2F</xref>). In contrast, cases with <italic>PTEN</italic> mutation or <italic>RB1</italic> mutation showed a higher level of <italic>CapG</italic> expression than cases with wild-type only in the non-proneural subtype (<xref rid="f2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2G and H</xref>). However, cases with <italic>ANXA1</italic> amplification, <italic>MYCN</italic> amplification, <italic>PDGFRA</italic> amplification, or <italic>IDH1</italic> mutation exhibited no significant <italic>CapG</italic> expression change in the proneural or non-proneural subtypes when compared with those without these genetic alterations (data available on request).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>High expression of CapG significantly predicts unfavorable clinical outcome of GBM patients in the TCGA cohort</title>
<p>To further explore the relationship between <italic>CapG</italic> expression and GBM patient clinical outcome in the TCGA cohort, we compared the OS and PFS of all GBM patients with differential <italic>CapG</italic> expression and observed statistically significant disadvantage in prognosis for GBM patients with higher <italic>CapG</italic> expression (OS, log-rank P=2.018E-04, HR=1.498, 95&#x0025; CI=1.209&#x2013;1.857, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref>; PFS, log-rank P=0.005, HR=1.398, 95&#x0025; CI=1.107&#x2013;1.767, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3E</xref>). Multivariate Cox regression further validated the <italic>CapG</italic> expression as an independent predictor for the GBM patient OS (P=0.002, HR=1.546, 95&#x0025; CI=1.170&#x2013;2.042) and PFS (P=0.029, HR=1.400, 95&#x0025; CI=1.035&#x2013;1.893) in the TCGA cohort (<xref rid="tIII-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>).</p>
<p>Moreover, we next performed survival analysis for each molecular subtype and detected that only the proneural (OS, log-rank P=0.001; HR=1.961, 95&#x0025; CI=1.313&#x2013;2.928, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3B</xref>; PFS, log-rank P=0.044; HR=1.570, 95&#x0025; CI=1.012&#x2013;2.435, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3F</xref>) subtype retained statistical significance. In addition, we carried out survival analyses stratified by the status of these common genetic alterations in GBM and found the effect of <italic>CapG</italic> on GBM patient prognosis was associated with <italic>EGFR</italic> amplification or <italic>CDK6</italic> amplification. It is noteworthy that the prognostic value of <italic>CapG</italic> was highly significant in individuals with wild-type <italic>CDK6</italic> (OS, log-rank P=0.001, HR=2.261, 95&#x0025; CI=1.409&#x2013;3.628, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3C</xref>; PFS, log-rank P=0.017, HR=1.966, 95&#x0025; CI=1.119&#x2013;3.111, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3G</xref>) or <italic>EGFR</italic> (OS, log-rank P=0.011, HR=2.154, 95&#x0025; CI=1.191&#x2013;3.897, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3D</xref>; PFS, log-rank P=0.033, HR=2.113, 95&#x0025; CI=1.064&#x2013;4.197, <xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3H</xref>), but not significant in individuals with amplification of <italic>CDK6</italic> or <italic>EGFR</italic>. Furthermore, patients with low <italic>CapG</italic> expression and wild-type <italic>EGFR</italic> or <italic>CDK6</italic> had the most favorable prognosis, whereas patients with high <italic>CapG</italic> expression and amplification of <italic>EGFR</italic> or <italic>CDK6</italic> had the poorest prognosis (<xref rid="f3-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3C, D, G and H</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CapG regulates glioma cell proliferation in vitro</title>
<p>Given that CapG is significantly upregulated in human glioma, we inferred that CapG may promote glioma cell proliferation. To confirm our hypothesis, we performed lentiviral infection to stably overexpress or knockdown CapG in U87 and U251 glioma cells. The efficiency of ectopic expression of CapG was verified by real-time PCR (data not shown) and western blotting (<xref rid="f4-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref>). Thus shCAPG-1 and shCAPG-3 were chosen for the following study according to their silencing efficiency.</p>
<p>We then studied the effect of CapG on cellular proliferation in U87 and U251 cells using CCK-8 assay. The results showed that overexpression of CapG significantly promoted the proliferation in comparison with the control groups, whereas knockdown of endogenous CapG markedly inhibited cellular growth in both cell lines (<xref rid="f4-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4B</xref>). Colony formation assay consistently showed that overexpression of CapG in U251 cells markedly increased the number of colonies, whereas knockdown of CapG significantly decreased the colony numbers compared with the controls (<xref rid="f4-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4C</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CapG regulates G1/S phase progression of the glioma cell cycle</title>
<p>To elucidate the mechanism by which depletion of CapG inhibits cell proliferation in U87 and U251 cells, we performed flow cytometry to analyze whether the inhibition is correlated with specific cell cycle changes. Compared with the shLacZ groups, U87 and U251 cells with CapG depletion showed marked increases in the percentage of cell in the G0/G1 phase and substantial decrease in the S phase (<xref rid="f5-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5A</xref>). To further investigate the molecules involved in the changes in the cell cycle, we determined the expression of several important regulators of the G1 phase by western blot assays (<xref rid="b30-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b32-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). As shown in <xref rid="f5-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5B</xref>, we observed that depletion of CapG significantly suppressed CDK2, Myc, cyclin A1 and D1, and phospho-RB expression in the U87 and U251 cells. However, the expression levels of cyclin E, CDK4, CDK6, E2F1, p15 and RB had no significant changes after CapG depletion. Collectively, these results suggest that knockdown of endogenous CapG induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in glioma cells.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ectopic CapG expression affects glioma cell migration and invasiveness</title>
<p>Recent research has shown that suppression of CapG expression influences the metastasis of prostate cancer cells (<xref rid="b20-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b29-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). We then examined the impact of CapG on glioma cell migration and invasiveness <italic>in vitro</italic>. In wound healing assays, CapG overexpression increased cell migration markedly within 24 or 48 h compared to the control cells, while silencing of CapG resulted in slower wound healing (<xref rid="f6-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6A-D</xref>). However, the effect on cell invasiveness was next assessed by Transwell invasion assays. Consistent with the abovementioned migration analyses, CapG upregulation substantially increased the invasive ability of the glioma cells while CapG depletion resulted in a significant decrease in invasiveness of the cells (<xref rid="f6-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="fig">Fig. 6E and F</xref>). Therefore, glioma cell migration and invasiveness were positively correlated with CapG expression levels.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, we demonstrated the prognostic value of CapG as well as its important role in proliferation and metastasis of glioma. In the TCGA data analysis, we attempted to explore the correlation of <italic>CapG</italic> with common genetic alterations of GBM. Notably, we noted that <italic>CapG</italic> expression was correlated to several of them (amplifications of <italic>CDK6</italic>, <italic>EGFR</italic>, <italic>MET</italic> and <italic>SYK</italic>, mutations of <italic>PTEN</italic> and <italic>RB1</italic>), and the correlation was only observed in non-proneural or proneural subtype. These data provide a clue for further study of the regulation of <italic>CapG</italic> expression in GBM patients. Moreover, we investigated the influence of differential <italic>CapG</italic> expression on GBM patient prognosis stratified by these molecular alterations. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested that the prognostic significance of <italic>CapG</italic> was dependent on the status of <italic>EGFR</italic> or <italic>CDK6</italic> alteration.</p>
<p><italic>EGFR</italic> is a vital oncogene found in many malignancies, and the majority of GBM show activated <italic>EGFR</italic> signaling through its amplification or genetic alteration, which drives the proliferation and metastasis of glioma cells (<xref rid="b33-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). However, EGFR, CDK6, a G1 cell cycle regulatory protein, is upregulated in glioma tissues and mediates glioma cell proliferation and migration (<xref rid="b34-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>). As the expression of <italic>CapG</italic> was only correlated with the amplification of <italic>EGFR</italic>/<italic>CDK6</italic> in the proneural subtype, we inferred that the proneural gene expression profile mediated the interaction between <italic>EGFR</italic>/<italic>CDK6</italic> and <italic>CapG</italic>. Therefore, the change in <italic>CapG</italic> expression level could further influence the proliferation and metastasis of glioma.</p>
<p>CapG, an actin binding protein, modulates the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton and aberrant turnover of the actin cytoskeleton, which are closely associated with cell proliferation and motility (<xref rid="b35-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). There is evidence that the CapG expression level is related to tumor cell proliferation and metastasis (<xref rid="b36-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>,<xref rid="b37-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>), and may be valuable for evaluating tumor progression and prognosis. For example, overexpression of CapG may be associated with tumor progression, as CapG protein is significant increased in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma (<xref rid="b38-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>&#x2013;<xref rid="b40-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>). CapG expression was also found to be upregulated in ovarian cancer and is possibly associated with survival outcome and advanced disease stage (<xref rid="b20-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>). In the present study, the mRNA and protein levels of CapG were significantly increased in human glioma, and higher CapG expression was an independent prognostic factor for predicting unfavorable prognosis. In subsequent function validation, CapG promoted cell proliferation and mediated G1/S transition in glioma cell lines U87 and U251. These results suggest that <italic>CapG</italic> is a putative oncogene in human glioma.</p>
<p>Recent findings have demonstrated that cancer metastasis and diffusion rely on increased tumor cell motility by accelerating cytoplasmic actin turnover (<xref rid="b35-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). In the present study, the wound healing and Transwell invasion assays indicated that CapG plays a critical role in glioma migration and invasiveness. It has been reported that nuclear complexes are significant for migration and invasiveness (<xref rid="b41-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>). Furthermore, nuclear complexes carry nuclear actin and are modified by actin binding protein (<xref rid="b41-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">41</xref>). Given that CapG is an actin binding protein, and elevated CapG is found at the tumor invasion interface zone in breast cancer (<xref rid="b42-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="bibr">42</xref>), we postulated that CapG expression may directly modulate cell migration and invasion.</p>
<p>In summary, the present study illustrated that CapG expression was significantly elevated in human glioma, and it predicted an unfavorable prognosis of glioma as a novel and independent prognostic factor, which was confirmed in a TMA analyses of a Chinese cohort and the independent TCGA dataset. In addition, the expression profile and prognostic value of CapG were correlated with different subtypes and several molecular features of GBM. Furthermore, CapG plays an important role in the proliferation and metastasis of glioma cells, suggesting its application as a promising therapeutic target of human glioma.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81772657, 81372706, 81372235 and 81071739). We thank Bo Zhu (School of Life Sciences, Fudan University) for his help with the Transwell invasion assays. We further thank all participants recruited in the present study.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<glossary>
<def-list>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-item><term>CapG</term><def><p>capping actin protein, gelsolin-like</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>GBM</term><def><p>glioblastoma</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CCK-8</term><def><p>Cell Counting Kit-8</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TMA</term><def><p>tissue microarray</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>TCGA</term><def><p>The Cancer Genome Atlas</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>LGG</term><def><p>low-grade glioma</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HGG</term><def><p>high-grade glioma</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>OS</term><def><p>overall survival</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>PFS</term><def><p>progression-free survival</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>HR</term><def><p>hazard ratio</p></def></def-item>
<def-item><term>CI</term><def><p>confidence interval</p></def></def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-or-39-03-1011"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ostrom</surname><given-names>QT</given-names></name><name><surname>Gittleman</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Farah</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Ondracek</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolinsky</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Stroup</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Kruchko</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Barnholtz-Sloan</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006&#x2013;2010</article-title><source>Neuro Oncol</source><volume>15</volume><supplement>Suppl 2</supplement><fpage>ii1</fpage><lpage>ii56</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/neuonc/not151</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24137015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3798196</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-or-39-03-1011"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Westphal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Lamszus</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The neurobiology of gliomas: From cell biology to the development of therapeutic approaches</article-title><source>Nat Rev Neurosci</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>495</fpage><lpage>508</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn3060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21811295</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-or-39-03-1011"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stupp</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Mason</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name><name><surname>Van den Bent</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Weller</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fisher</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Taphoorn</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Belanger</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Brandes</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Marosi</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bogdahn</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><volume>352</volume><fpage>987</fpage><lpage>996</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa043330</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15758009</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-or-39-03-1011"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Meir</surname><given-names>EG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadjipanayis</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Norden</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>PY</given-names></name><name><surname>Olson</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Exciting new advances in neuro-oncology: The avenue to a cure for malignant glioma</article-title><source>CA Cancer J Clin</source><volume>60</volume><fpage>166</fpage><lpage>193</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.20069</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20445000</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2888474</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-or-39-03-1011"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Louis</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Curry</surname><given-names>WT</given-names></name><name><surname>Batchelor</surname><given-names>TT</given-names></name><name><surname>Dietrich</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Diagnostic and therapeutic avenues for glioblastoma: No longer a dead end?</article-title><source>Nat Rev Clin Oncol</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>26</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.204</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23183634</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-or-39-03-1011"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gilbert</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Dignam</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Armstrong</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wefel</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Blumenthal</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name><surname>Vogelbaum</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Colman</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Chakravarti</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Pugh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Won</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><volume>370</volume><fpage>699</fpage><lpage>708</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa1308573</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24552317</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4201043</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-or-39-03-1011"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="conference"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lilljebjorn</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ran</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Soneson</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sjogren</surname><given-names>HO</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A glioma classification scheme based on coexpression modules of EGFR and PDGFRA</article-title><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>3538</fpage><lpage>3543</lpage><conf-date>2014</conf-date><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1313814111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24550449</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3948229</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-or-39-03-1011"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>You</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Molecular classification of gliomas based on whole genome gene expression: A systematic report of 225 samples from the Chinese Glioma Cooperative Group</article-title><source>Neuro Oncol</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>1432</fpage><lpage>1440</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/neuonc/nos263</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23090983</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3499016</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-or-39-03-1011"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>YF</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>XY</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>CX</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>ZX</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ZB</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>COL3A1 and SNAP91: Novel glioblastoma markers with diagnostic and prognostic value</article-title><source>Oncotarget</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>70494</fpage><lpage>70503</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.12038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27655637</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">5342568</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-or-39-03-1011"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>XH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>ZC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Primate-specific miR-663 functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting PIK3CD and predicts the prognosis of human glioblastoma</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>1803</fpage><lpage>1813</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2284</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24523440</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-or-39-03-1011"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A radiosensitivity gene signature in predicting glioma prognostic via EMT pathway</article-title><source>Oncotarget</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>4683</fpage><lpage>4693</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.2088</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24970813</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4148091</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-or-39-03-1011"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yun</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>High expression of N-myc (and STAT) interactor predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor growth in human glioblastoma</article-title><source>Oncotarget</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>4901</fpage><lpage>4919</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.3208</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25669971</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-or-39-03-1011"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><collab collab-type="corp-author">Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network</collab><article-title>Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>455</volume><fpage>1061</fpage><lpage>1068</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature07385</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18772890</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2671642</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-or-39-03-1011"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rutledge</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gutman</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Appin</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Scarpace</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Mikkelsen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma are associated with specific genomic alterations and related to transcriptional class</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>4951</fpage><lpage>4960</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0551</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23864165</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-or-39-03-1011"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>VF</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>ZIP4 is a novel molecular marker for glioma</article-title><source>Neuro Oncol</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1008</fpage><lpage>1016</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/neuonc/not042</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23595627</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3714151</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-or-39-03-1011"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>VAMP8 facilitates cellular proliferation and temozolomide resistance in human glioma cells</article-title><source>Neuro Oncol</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>407</fpage><lpage>418</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/neuonc/nou219</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25209430</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-or-39-03-1011"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silacci</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Mazzolai</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gauci</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Stergiopulos</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayoz</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gelsolin superfamily proteins: Key regulators of cellular functions</article-title><source>Cell Mol Life Sci</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>2614</fpage><lpage>2623</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00018-004-4225-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15526166</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-or-39-03-1011"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Impe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>De Corte</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Eichinger</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruyneel</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mareel</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandekerckhove</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gettemans</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The nucleo-cytoplasmic actin-binding protein CapG lacks a nuclear export sequence present in structurally related proteins</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>278</volume><fpage>17945</fpage><lpage>17952</lpage><year>2003</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M209946200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12637565</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-or-39-03-1011"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Witke</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwiatkowski</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Southwick</surname><given-names>FS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparisons of CapG and gelsolin-null macrophages: Demonstration of a unique role for CapG in receptor-mediated ruffling, phagocytosis, and vesicle rocketing</article-title><source>J Cell Biol</source><volume>154</volume><fpage>775</fpage><lpage>784</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200101113</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11514591</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2196452</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-or-39-03-1011"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dahl</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadr-Nabavi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Klopocki</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Betz</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Grube</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kreutzfeld</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Himmelfarb</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>An</surname><given-names>HX</given-names></name><name><surname>Gelling</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Klaman</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Systematic identification and molecular characterization of genes differentially expressed in breast and ovarian cancer</article-title><source>J Pathol</source><volume>205</volume><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/path.1687</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15586368</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-or-39-03-1011"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lan</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Overexpression of SLC7A7 predicts poor progression-free and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma</article-title><source>Med Oncol</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>384</fpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12032-012-0384-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23408368</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-or-39-03-1011"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kononen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bubendorf</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kallioniemi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Barlund</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Schraml</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Leighton</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Torhorst</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mihatsch</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sauter</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kallioniemi</surname><given-names>OP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens</article-title><source>Nat Med</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>844</fpage><lpage>847</lpage><year>1998</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nm0798-844</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9662379</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-or-39-03-1011"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohuchida</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Mizumoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishikawa</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujii</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Konomi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagai</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamaguchi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuneyoshi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of S100A6 in pancreatic cancer development and its clinical implication as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>7785</fpage><lpage>7793</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0714</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16278400</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-or-39-03-1011"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Livak</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmittgen</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2<sup>&#x0394;&#x0394;CT</sup> method</article-title><source>Methods</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>402</fpage><lpage>408</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.2001.1262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11846609</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-or-39-03-1011"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malliri</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Es</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Huveneers</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Collard</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Rac exchange factor Tiam1 is required for the establishment and maintenance of cadherin-based adhesions</article-title><source>J Biol Chem</source><volume>279</volume><fpage>30092</fpage><lpage>30098</lpage><year>2004</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M401192200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15138270</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-or-39-03-1011"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lois</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pease</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Baltimore</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>868</fpage><lpage>872</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1067081</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11786607</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-or-39-03-1011"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>XC</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>HB</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>YY</given-names></name><name><surname>Mo</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>WT</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Identification of miR-133b and RB1CC1 as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence and potential therapeutic targets for prostate cancer</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>2312</fpage><lpage>2325</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1588</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24610824</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-or-39-03-1011"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verhaak</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoadley</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Purdom</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wilkerson</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Golub</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Mesirov</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1</article-title><source>Cancer Cell</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>110</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20129251</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">2818769</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-or-39-03-1011"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brennan</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Verhaak</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>McKenna</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Campos</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Noushmehr</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Salama</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chakravarty</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanborn</surname><given-names>JZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Berman</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>155</volume><fpage>462</fpage><lpage>477</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.034</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24120142</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">3910500</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-or-39-03-1011"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsushime</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hiebert</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ewen</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Sherr</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Direct binding of cyclin-D to the retinoblastoma gene-product (prb) and pRb phosphorylation by the cyclin D-dependent kinase Cdk4</article-title><source>Genes Dev</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>342</lpage><year>1993</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.7.3.331</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8449399</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-or-39-03-1011"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lundberg</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinberg</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexes</article-title><source>Mol Cell Biol</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>753</fpage><lpage>761</lpage><year>1998</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.18.2.753</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9447971</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">108786</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-or-39-03-1011"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weinberg</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The retinoblastoma protein and cell-cycle control</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>81</volume><fpage>323</fpage><lpage>330</lpage><year>1995</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(95)90385-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7736585</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-or-39-03-1011"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Francis</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>CZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Maire</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Manzo</surname><given-names>VE</given-names></name><name><surname>Adalsteinsson</surname><given-names>VA</given-names></name><name><surname>Homer</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Haidar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Blumenstiel</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedamallu</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>EGFR variant heterogeneity in glioblastoma resolved through single-nucleus sequencing</article-title><source>Cancer Discov</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>956</fpage><lpage>971</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0879</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24893890</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4125473</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-or-39-03-1011"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>H19 derived microRNA-675 regulates cell proliferation and migration through CDK6 in glioma</article-title><source>Am J Transl Res</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>1747</fpage><lpage>1764</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26692922</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmcid">4656755</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-or-39-03-1011"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The cytoskeleton and cancer</article-title><source>Cancer Metastasis Rev</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10555-008-9166-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19153674</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-or-39-03-1011"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>XY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hao</surname><given-names>CY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The significance of a group of molecular markers and clinicopathological factors in identifying colorectal liver metastasis</article-title><source>Hepatogastroenterology</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>1182</fpage><lpage>1188</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5754/hge11380</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21937374</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-or-39-03-1011"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Teng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gelsolin-like actin-capping protein is associated with patient prognosis, cellular apoptosis and proliferation in prostate cancer</article-title><source>Biomark Med</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1251</fpage><lpage>1260</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2217/bmm-2016-0186</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27924630</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-or-39-03-1011"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ying</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Overexpression of gelsolin-like actin-capping protein is associated with progression of lung adenocarcinoma</article-title><source>Tohoku J Exp Med</source><volume>225</volume><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>101</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1620/tjem.225.95</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21908955</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b39-or-39-03-1011"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>WY</given-names></name><name><surname>Hunag</surname><given-names>YY</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>XG</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>DD</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic evaluation of CapG, gelsolin, P-gp, GSTP1, and Topo-II proteins in non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Anat Rec</source><volume>295</volume><fpage>208</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ar.21523</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b40-or-39-03-1011"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashcroft</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Saraga</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Vimalachandran</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Prime</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Dodson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenkins</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Lemoine</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Pancreatic cancer cells overexpress gelsolin family-capping proteins, which contribute to their cell motility</article-title><source>Gut</source><volume>56</volume><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/gut.2005.083691</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16847067</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b41-or-39-03-1011"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hubert</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Impe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandekerckhove</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gettemans</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The F-actin filament capping protein CapG is a bona fide nucleolar protein</article-title><source>Biochem Biophys Res Commun</source><volume>377</volume><fpage>699</fpage><lpage>704</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.048</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18938132</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b42-or-39-03-1011"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>An</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>BG</given-names></name><name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>YP</given-names></name><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>MQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Na</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HK</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Proteomic molecular portrait of interface zone in breast cancer</article-title><source>J Proteome Res</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>5638</fpage><lpage>5645</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/pr1004532</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20857901</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption><p>Expression profile and prognostic value of CapG in a Chinese glioma cohort. (A) CapG protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemical staining in different WHO grades of human glioma specimens and normal controls. Scale bars are depicted in figures. (B) Immunoreactivity scores of CapG staining in normal controls, LGG and HGG are represented as mean &#x00B1; SEM. (C) The relative <italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression in 16 LGG and 20 HGG compared with 16 normal controls, and <italic>GAPDH</italic> was used as an endogenous control. Kaplan-Meier analyses of the associations between differential CapG levels and (D) OS or (E) PFS in 285 glioma patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses of the associations between differential CapG levels and (F) OS or (G) PFS in 165 HGG patients. P-values were determined by log-rank test, while hazard ratio (HR) and 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI) were obtained from univariate Cox regression model; &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001. LGG, low-grade glioma; HGG, high-grade glioma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g00.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption><p><italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression levels are elevated in glioma (GBM) specimens and are correlated with several common molecular features in the TCGA cohort. (A) <italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression levels were detected in 10 cases of normal controls and 528 GBM specimens in the TCGA cohort. The value represents log<sub>2</sub> of the <italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression level of each GBM sample to the mean of 10 normal controls. (B) <italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression levels were compared between normal controls and 4 different molecular subtypes of GBM samples. (C-H) <italic>CapG</italic> mRNA expression was compared according to several common molecular features in subgroups (proneural and non-proneural) of GBM. &#x2018;NC&#x2019;, no change; &#x2018;Amp&#x2019;, amplification; &#x2018;Wt&#x2019;, wild-type; &#x2018;Mut&#x2019;, mutation; &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01; &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.001.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g01.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption><p>The prognostic value of <italic>CapG</italic> expression in glioma (GBM) specimens of the TCGA cohort. Kaplan-Meier analyses of differential <italic>CapG</italic> gene expression for overall survival (upper panels) and progression-free survival (lower panels) of all (A and E) GBM patients or (B and F) proneural subtype or considering the amplification status of (C and G) <italic>CDK6</italic> or (D and H) <italic>EGFR</italic>; P-values were determined by log-rank test, while hazard ratio (HR) and 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI) were obtained from the univariate Cox regression model.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g02.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption><p>Overexpression and depletion of CapG in U87 and U251 human glioma cell lines. (A) Protein level of CapG was analyzed by western blot assays. GAPDH served as a loading control. (B) The cell proliferation curve of CapG overexpression and knockdown cells performed by CCK-8 assay. (C) Colony formation assay performed in CapG overexpression and knockdown cells. The assay was determined 3 times with triplicate samples, and bars represent the number of colonies (right panels); &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01; P&#x003C;0.001.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g03.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 5.</label>
<caption><p>CapG regulates G1/S phase progression of glioma cell cycle. (A) The cell cycle distribution of U87 and U251 glioma cells after knockdown of endogenous CapG expression. Values are means &#x00B1; SEM; &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05. (B) The effects of CapG knockdown on cell cycle proteins in the G1/S transition were measured by western blot assays. GAPDH was used as a loading control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g04.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Figure 6.</label>
<caption><p>CapG expression modulates glioma cell migration and invasiveness in U87 and U251. (A-D) In wound healing assays, CapG depletion cells showed a significant decrease in motility. Consistent with that, CapG overexpression caused a significant earlier wound closure of the scratch. (E and F) In Transwell invasion assay, CapG overexpression had a higher effect on invasion than CapG depletion. Scale bars are depicted in figures; &#x002A;P&#x003C;0.05; &#x002A;&#x002A;P&#x003C;0.01.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="OR-39-03-1011-g05.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Table I.</label>
<caption><p>Clinicopathologic characteristics of the 285 glioma patients in the Chinese TMA cohort.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="4">WHO grade</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="4"><hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">All glioma cases (N=285)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Grade I (N=12)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Grade II (N=108)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Grade III (N=46)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Grade IV (N=119)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Sex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Male</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">188</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8 (66.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">75 (69.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27 (58.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">78 (65.5&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Female</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4 (33.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">33 (30.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19 (41.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">41 (34.4&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Age at diagnosis (year)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">241</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11 (91.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">101 (93.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40 (90.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">89 (74.8&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">44</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1 (8.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7 (6.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6 (10.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30 (25.2&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Tumor origin</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Primary</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">253</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12 (100&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">102 (94.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35 (76.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">104 (87.4&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Secondary</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0 (0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7 (6.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11 (33.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15 (12.6&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Extent of resection</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Gross total</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">224</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8 (66.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">89 (82.4&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34 (73.9&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">93 (78.2&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Partial</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4 (33.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">19 (17.6&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12 (26.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26 (21.8&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">CapG expression</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">180</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8 (66.7&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">80 (74.1&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30 (65.2&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">62 (52.1&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">105</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4 (33.3&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">28 (26.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16 (34.8&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">57 (47.9&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;OS (months)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30 (27.4&#x2013;33.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">NA<sup><xref rid="tfn2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">45 (41.1&#x2013;51.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26 (23.9&#x2013;37.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16 (13.3&#x2013;18.8)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Median (95&#x0025; CI)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PFS (months)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">27 (24.9&#x2013;30.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">NA<sup><xref rid="tfn2-or-39-03-1011" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">40 (38.2&#x2013;48.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25 (20.8&#x2013;33.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">14 (11.2&#x2013;16.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="6">Median (95&#x0025; CI)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn1-or-39-03-1011"><p>TMA, tissue microarray; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; CI, confidence interval.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfn2-or-39-03-1011"><label>a</label><p>NA, not available due to a large proportion of censored cases.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Table II.</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate Cox regression of CapG immunoreactivity for OS and PFS in all glioma and HGG patients of the Chinese TMA cohort.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Univariate Cox regression</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Multivariate Cox regression</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">HR (95&#x0025; CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">HR (95&#x0025; CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">All glioma cases (N=292)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;OS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.587</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years (&#x2265;60 vs. &#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.004</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.844 (1.220&#x2013;2.786)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.037</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.580 (1.027&#x2013;2.429)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs. primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.676</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Resection (gross total vs. patial)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.041</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.370 (1.013&#x2013;1.852)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.825</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Necrosis (negative vs. positive)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.005</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.842 (1.198&#x2013;2.833)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.076</bold></td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Grade (III&#x002B;IV vs. I&#x002B;II)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.069E-18</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.080 (4.072&#x2013;9.077)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.079E-14</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">5.307 (3.476&#x2013;8.103)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;CapG cytoplasm (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>2.553E-06</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.171 (1.572&#x2013;2.999)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.003</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.674 (1.198&#x2013;2.339)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PFS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.597</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years (&#x2265;60 vs.&#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.976 (1.307&#x2013;2.986)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.003</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.806 (1.215&#x2013;2.684)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs. primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.315</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Resection (gross total vs. patial)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.067</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Necrosis (negative vs. positive)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.001</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.090 (1.358&#x2013;3.217)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.138</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Grade (III&#x002B;IV vs. I&#x002B;II)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.911E-19</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.409 (4.279&#x2013;9.594)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.424E-14</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.456 (3.045&#x2013;6.519)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;CapG cytoplasm (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>3.334E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.913 (1.408&#x2013;2.600)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.008</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.543 (1.123&#x2013;2.120)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">HGG (N=174)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;OS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.522</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years years (&#x2265;60 vs. &#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.303</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs. primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.055</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Resection (gross total vs. patial)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.408</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Necrosis (negative vs. positive)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.817</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;CapG cytoplasm (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.541 (1.067&#x2013;2.225)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.541 (1.067&#x2013;2.225)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PFS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.350</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years (&#x2265;60 vs. &#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.104</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs. primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.142</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Resection (gross total vs. patial)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.463</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Necrosis (negative vs. positive)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.373</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;CapG cytoplasm (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.032</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.476 (1.034&#x2013;2.107)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.032</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.476 (1.034&#x2013;2.107)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn3-or-39-03-1011"><p>OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HGG, high-grade gliomas; TMA, tissue microarray; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. P-values denoted in bold indicate a significant difference.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-or-39-03-1011" position="float">
<label>Table III.</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate Cox regression of <italic>CapG</italic> expression for OS and PFS in GBM patients of the TCGA cohort.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Univariate Cox regression</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Multivariate Cox regression</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom" colspan="2"><hr/></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">HR (95&#x0025; CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">HR (95&#x0025; CI)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">GBM (N=528)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;OS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.464</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years (&#x003E;60 vs. &#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.415E-10</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.938 (1.583&#x2013;2.372)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.577E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.609 (1.257&#x2013;2.058)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>4.415E-05</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.394 (0.252&#x2013;0.616)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.558 (0.339&#x2013;0.917)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Subtype (proneural vs. non-proneural)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.038</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.786 (0.626&#x2013;0.986)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.024</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.425 (1.047&#x2013;1.940)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>EGFR</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.066E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.846 (1.354&#x2013;2.518)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.372</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>CDK6</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.495 (1.162&#x2013;1.922)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.413</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>SYK</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.831</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>MYCN</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.087</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>MET</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.030</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.275 (1.023&#x2013;1.589)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.299</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>PTEN</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.863</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>RB1</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.363</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>IDH1</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.003E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.373 (0.227&#x2013;0.613)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.019</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.486 (0.266&#x2013;0.887)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>CAPG</italic> expression (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>2.246E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.498 (1.209&#x2013;1.857)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.002</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.546 (1.170&#x2013;2.042)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="5">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PFS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex (male vs. female)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.350</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Age, years (&#x003E;60 vs. &#x003C;60)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>7.769E-05</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.566 (1.254&#x2013;1.956)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.114</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor origin (secondary vs primary)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>1.821E-06</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.294 (0.178&#x2013;0.486)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>3.154E-04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.350 (0.197&#x2013;0.619)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Subtype (proneural vs. non-proneural)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.038</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.762 (0.589&#x2013;0.985)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.022</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.493 (1.060&#x2013;2.104)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>EGFR</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>4.563E-05</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.197 (1.505&#x2013;3.208)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.011</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.384 (1.223&#x2013;4.648)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>CDK6</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.025</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.375 (1.041&#x2013;1.816)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.876</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>SYK</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.193</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>MYCN</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.619</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>MET</italic> (amplification vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.184</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>PTEN</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.780</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>RB1</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.816</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>IDH1</italic> (mutation vs. wild-type)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.501 (0.287&#x2013;0.872)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.845</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;<italic>CAPG</italic> expression (high vs. low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.005</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.398 (1.107&#x2013;1.767)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>0.029</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.400 (1.035&#x2013;1.893)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="tfn4-or-39-03-1011"><p>OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; GBM, glioblastoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio. P-values denoted in bold indicate a significant difference.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>