<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MCO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Molecular and Clinical Oncology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2049-9450</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2049-9469</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mco.2020.2095</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MCO-0-0-02095</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Prognostic role of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic solid tumors</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zucker</surname><given-names>Amanda</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Winter</surname><given-names>Alex</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
<xref rid="fn1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="author-notes">&#x002A;</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lumley</surname><given-names>Dean</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Karwowski</surname><given-names>Pawel</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jung</surname><given-names>Min-Kyung</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>Johnny</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af2-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="aff">2</xref>
<xref rid="c1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="corresp"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-mco-0-0-02095"><label>1</label>College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Glen Head, NY 11545, USA</aff>
<aff id="af2-mco-0-0-02095"><label>2</label>Department of Radiation Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, West Islip, NY 11795, USA</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-mco-0-0-02095"><italic>Correspondence to:</italic> Dr Johnny Kao, Department of Radiation Oncology, Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, 1000 Montauk Highway, West Islip, NY 11795, USA <email>johnny.kao@chsli.org</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn1-mco-0-0-02095"><p><sup>&#x002A;</sup>Contributed equally</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>10</month>
<year>2020</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>16</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2020</year></pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<elocation-id>25</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2020, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with poor survival in a number of solid tumors, but has not been extensively investigated in the context of radiation oncology. Developing more robust models to predict survival would inform patient care for patients with metastatic solid tumors. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of baseline NLR (using 4 as a cutoff) on survival in 320 consecutive patients with metastatic cancer who were referred to a single radiation oncologist between 2012 and 2015, with a median follow-up of 20.6 months. The median NLR was 4.4 (interquartile range, 2.8-7.2). Patients with a baseline NLR &#x2264;4 had a median survival of 9.3 months compared to 4.1 months for NLR &#x003E;4 (P&#x003C;0.001). The number of active tumors, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, baseline albumin, primary tumor site, liver metastases and baseline NLR predicted overall survival on both univariate and multivariate analysis (P&#x003C;0.05 for all). After adjusting for known prognostic factors for advanced solid tumors, baseline NLR &#x003E;4 independently predicted adverse survival in this cohort.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio</kwd>
<kwd>radiation</kwd>
<kwd>survival prediction</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Tumor-promoting inflammation by innate immune cells fosters multiple hallmarks of cancer (<xref rid="b1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a widely utilized marker of host inflammation (<xref rid="b2-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). High baseline NLR (&#x003E;4) has been demonstrated to have prognostic significance for overall survival in solid tumors, with a hazard ratio of 1.8(<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Our group has previously validated the NEAT model, including the number of active tumors (&#x2018;N&#x2019;), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (&#x2018;E&#x2019;), albumin (&#x2018;A&#x2019;), and primary tumor site (&#x2018;T&#x2019;) as important prognostic factors for patients with metastatic cancer referred to radiation oncology (<xref rid="b4-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). Other validated models identified age, extent of prior chemotherapy, recent hospitalization, liver metastases and bone-only metastases as prognostic factors for radiation oncology patients with metastatic cancer (<xref rid="b6-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b7-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). However, despite extensive research, these validated models only accounted for 30-50&#x0025; of observed survival (<xref rid="b5-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>).</p>
<p>The prognostic role of baseline NLR has been demonstrated in 100 studies for several types of solid tumors (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). To date, limited data has been provided for NLR in patients treated with radiation, particularly in those with metastatic solid tumors (<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with metastatic disease treated with radiation tend to have a baseline NLR of 4-5 (<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>). By contrast, the baseline NLR for the general population is 1.65-2.15 (<xref rid="b10-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b11-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>). Since NLR is a widely available and cost-effective measure of systemic inflammation, the current study hypothesized that elevated NLR may add further prognostic value, thereby improving predictive accuracy.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Inclusion criteria</title>
<p>The present retrospective study included 320 consecutive patients (age range, 23-97 years), with metastatic stage IV solid tumor who were referred to a single physician in a large community hospital-based radiation &#x039F;ncology Department between May 2012 and October 2015. This minimal risk study was approved by the Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Data collection</title>
<p>The charts and electronic records of all patients were assessed for previously validated prognostic factors, including ECOG performance status score (ECOG 0-1 vs. ECOG 2 vs. ECOG 3-4), primary tumor type (breast, prostate, kidney, lung or other), number of tumors (1-5 vs. &#x2265;6), serum albumin (&#x2265;3.4 vs. 2.4-3.3 vs. &#x2264;2.4 g/dl), location of metastases (bone only vs. liver vs. other) and age (&#x003E;60 years vs. &#x2264;60 years). Additionally, the relative contribution of baseline NLR (&#x003E;4 vs. &#x2264;4) at the time of consultation was explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis was performed with Stata 13.1 (StataCorp LP). The primary outcome was overall survival, defined as the time from the initial radiation oncology consultation to the date of death from any cause. Patients were included regardless of treatment received, and patients who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and summarized by median and 6-month survival. Differences in survival were assessed through the log-rank method. The association of individual variables with survival was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model that was verified by tests of correlations over time with examination of residual plots. The Pearson &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> test was performed to determine whether there were baseline differences in variables that were associated with high or low NLR. Statistical tests were two-sided, and P&#x003C;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient characteristics</title>
<p>The study population included 320 patients with distant metastases who were referred for radiation oncology evaluation, with 55&#x0025; inpatient and 45&#x0025; outpatient consultations. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range, 60-78 years), the median NLR was 4.4 (interquartile range, 2.8-7.2) and the median albumin was 3.4 g/dl (interquartile range, 2.8-3.8 g/dl). In terms of performance status, 39&#x0025; of the patients were ECOG 0-1, 29&#x0025; were ECOG 2 and 32&#x0025; were ECOG 3-4. The most common types of cancer included non-small cell lung cancer (34&#x0025;), breast (14&#x0025;), small cell lung cancer (10&#x0025;), prostate (9&#x0025;), colorectal (6&#x0025;), kidney (4&#x0025;), endometrial (4&#x0025;) and unknown primary (4&#x0025;). With respect to the extent of the disease, 7&#x0025; of the patients had only 1 site of active disease, 7&#x0025; had 2 active tumors and 13&#x0025; had 3-5 active tumors. Liver metastases were present in 21&#x0025; of the patients and 16&#x0025; had bone-only metastases. Only 12&#x0025; of the patients had previously received &#x2265;2 lines of palliative chemotherapy.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Radiation therapy and systemic therapy</title>
<p>Among the 320 patients evaluated, 81&#x0025; were treated with radiation therapy. Treatment was personalized to account for disease site and clinical status and goals of treatment. To summarize, the majority of the patients were treated with standard palliative regimens, most commonly 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Patients with a poor prognosis were either not treated or treated with short-course radiation (8-20 Gy in 1-5 fractions). Patients with limited brain metastatic disease (typically 1 to 4 brain metastases) were often treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (27 Gy in 3 fractions) or single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (21-24 Gy in 1 fraction). Patients with good performance status and oligometastatic disease (defined as &#x2264;5 metastases) were treated with curative intent dose-intensive treatment regimens (<xref rid="b12-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>).</p>
<p>Systemic therapy was administered at the discretion of the treating medical oncologist and, depending on the diagnosis, consisted of chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biologically targeted therapy, immunotherapy and/or supportive care.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Predictors of survival on univariate analysis</title>
<p>The median survival for all patients was 6.7 months, with a median follow-up for surviving patients of 20.6 months. On univariate analysis, baseline NLR, number of tumors, ECOG performance status, serum albumin, primary tumor site, prior hospitalization within the last 3 months, liver metastases, bone-only and liver metastases, were found to be significant predictors of survival (<xref rid="tI-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). The median survival for patients with an NLR of &#x2264;4 was 9.3 months vs. 4.1 months for those with an NLR of &#x003E;4 (<xref rid="f1-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). Age and number of prior palliative chemotherapy cycles were not found to be statistically significant in predicting survival.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Multivariate analysis</title>
<p>On Cox regression analysis, the statistically significant predictors of survival included ECOG performance status (P&#x003C;0.001), number of tumors (P&#x003C;0.001), primary tumor site (P&#x003C;0.001), albumin (P&#x003C;0.001), liver metastases (P=0.013) and baseline NLR (P=0.042). Age (P=0.98), number of prior chemotherapy cycles (P=0.93), recent hospitalization (P=0.59) and bone-only metastases (P=0.79) were not found to be statistically significant in predicting survival (<xref rid="tII-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The present study demonstrated that baseline NLR is an independent predictor of survival in patients with metastatic cancer, even when accounting for potential confounding variables, including performance status, albumin, tumor type and extent of the disease. While statistically significant, the P-value and hazard ratio (P=0.042; hazard ratio, 1.34) indicated that only small improvements were observed when compared with the previously published and validated NEAT model, defined as the number of active tumors (&#x2018;N&#x2019;), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (&#x2018;E&#x2019;), albumin (&#x2018;A&#x2019;), and primary tumor site (&#x2018;T&#x2019;) (<xref rid="b5-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). In terms of a predictive model, adding NLR did not significantly improve the performance of the NEAT model, having little effect on the C-index or modified r2 coefficient of determination (unpublished data).</p>
<p>The mechanism underlying the association of high baseline NLR with poor survival remains elusive. The impact of host antitumor immunity on patient clinical outcome with advanced solid tumors is of great interest to practicing oncologists. Tumors accompanied by significant systemic inflammation behave more aggressively, which likely reflects the contribution of the microenvironment to disease progression (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). Neutrophils are not only antagonists of microbial infection and facilitators of wound healing, but also promoters of cancer initiation, progression and metastasis (<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). In tumors, neutrophils suppress T cell function, leading to tumor progression (<xref rid="b16-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, particularly those with Th1 polarization, are associated with improved prognosis (<xref rid="b17-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>).</p>
<p>Although neutrophils and lymphocytes are non-specific parameters that are affected by concurrent infection, inflammation, corticosteroids, chemotherapy and radiation therapy, baseline NLR is a promising, readily available and cost-effective biomarker that adds prognostic value to known clinical and laboratory prognostic factors (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b18-mco-0-0-02095" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>). In the present study, patients with an NLR &#x003E;4 with metastatic disease that were referred to radiation oncology had a median survival of 4.1 months. Further investigation of NLR in specific subsets of patients, including those with specific tumor types, oligometastatic and widespread metastatic disease treated with radiation therapy, is warranted.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Research support was provided by The Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center Foundation (West Islip, NY, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; contributions</title>
<p>AW, AZ, DL, PK, M-KJ and JK made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data. AW, AZ, DL, PK, M-KJ and JK agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. AW, AZ, DL, PK and JK been involved in drafting the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All the authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript to be published.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title>
<p>The Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center IRB (no. 16-016) approved this minimal risk registry study with waiver of informed consent. There were no vulnerable populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient consent for publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-mco-0-0-02095"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanahan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinberg</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>144</volume><fpage>646</fpage><lpage>674</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21376230</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-mco-0-0-02095"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guthrie</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Charles</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Roxburgh</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Horgan</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name><name><surname>McMillan</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Clarke</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: Experience in patients with cancer</article-title><source>Crit Rev Oncol Hematol</source><volume>88</volume><fpage>218</fpage><lpage>230</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23602134</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.03.010</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-mco-0-0-02095"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Templeton</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>McNamara</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>&#x0160;eruga</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Vera-Badillo</surname><given-names>FE</given-names></name><name><surname>Aneja</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Oca&#x00F1;a</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Leibowitz-Amit</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sonpavde</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Knox</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><volume>106</volume><issue>dju124</issue><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24875653</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jnci/dju124</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-mco-0-0-02095"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gold</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name><name><surname>Zarrili</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Copel</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Silverman</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramsaran</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Yens</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ryu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical predictors of survival for patients with stage IV cancer referred to radiation oncology</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>10</volume><issue>e0124329</issue><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25894552</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0124329</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-mco-0-0-02095"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zucker</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Loscalzo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Calves</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The NEAT predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer</article-title><source>Cancer Res Treat</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>1433</fpage><lpage>1443</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29361815</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4143/crt.2017.223</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-mco-0-0-02095"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chow</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdolell</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Panzarella</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Bezjak</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Warde</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Tannock</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer</article-title><source>J Clin Oncol</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>5863</fpage><lpage>5869</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19018082</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1363</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-mco-0-0-02095"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krishnan</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Epstein-Peterson</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Tseng</surname><given-names>YD</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Temel</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Catalano</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Balboni</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Predicting life expectancy in patients with metastatic cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: The TEACHH model</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24122413</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cncr.28408</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-mco-0-0-02095"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Timmins</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozao-Choy</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Packer</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of combined sunitinib and extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy on bone marrow hematopoiesis</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>2139</fpage><lpage>2144</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27602153</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2016.4851</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-mco-0-0-02095"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Golden</surname><given-names>EB</given-names></name><name><surname>Chhabra</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chachoua</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Donach</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fenton-Kerimian</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedman</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ponzo</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Babb</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldberg</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Local radiotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to generate abscopal responses in patients with metastatic solid tumours: A proof-of-principle trial</article-title><source>Lancet Oncol</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>795</fpage><lpage>803</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26095785</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00054-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-mco-0-0-02095"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Azab</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Camacho-Rivera</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Taioli</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Average values and racial differences of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio among a nationally representative sample of United States subjects</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>9</volume><issue>e112361</issue><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25375150</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0112361</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-mco-0-0-02095"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forget</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Khalifa</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Defour</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Latinne</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Pel</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>De Kock</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio?</article-title><source>BMC Res Notes</source><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28057051</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13104-016-2335-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-mco-0-0-02095"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Blumenschein</surname><given-names>GR Jr</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Camidge</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Doebele</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Skoulidis</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaspar</surname><given-names>LE</given-names></name><name><surname>Gibbons</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after front-line systemic therapy: A multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study</article-title><source>Lancet Oncol</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>1672</fpage><lpage>1682</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27789196</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30532-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-mco-0-0-02095"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayala-Peacock</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Blackstock</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name><name><surname>Okunieff</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sung</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Weichselbaum</surname><given-names>RR</given-names></name><name><surname>Kao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Urbanic</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Milano</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Classification for long-term survival in oligometastatic patients treated with ablative radiotherapy: A multi-institutional pooled analysis</article-title><source>PLoS One</source><volume>13</volume><issue>e0195149</issue><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29649281</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0195149</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-mco-0-0-02095"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kitamura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>BZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pollard</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immune cell promotion of metastasis</article-title><source>Nat Rev Immunol</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>86</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25614318</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nri3789</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-mco-0-0-02095"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coffelt</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name><name><surname>Wellenstein</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>de Visser</surname><given-names>KE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neutrophils in cancer: Neutral no more</article-title><source>Nat Rev Cancer</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>446</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27282249</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrc.2016.52</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-mco-0-0-02095"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nicolas-Avila</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Adrover</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hidalgo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neutrophils in homeostasis, immunity, and cancer</article-title><source>Immunity</source><volume>46</volume><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28099862</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-mco-0-0-02095"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Gildener-Leapman</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisenstein</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Coakley</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozao</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandeli</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Divino</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwartz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sung</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as an immune parameter in patients with concurrent sunitinib and stereotactic body radiotherapy</article-title><source>Clin Cancer Res</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>4073</fpage><lpage>4085</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25922428</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2742</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-mco-0-0-02095"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chowdhary</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Switchenko</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Press</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jhaveri</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Buchwald</surname><given-names>ZS</given-names></name><name><surname>Blumenfeld</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Marwaha</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Abrams</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts for overall survival in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery</article-title><source>J Neurooncol</source><volume>139</volume><fpage>689</fpage><lpage>697</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29846893</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11060-018-2914-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-mco-0-0-02095" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Effect of NLR on the overall survival of patients with metastatic solid tumors. NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-13-04-02095-g00.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-mco-0-0-02095" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption><p>Predictors of overall survival.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Number (&#x0025;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Median survival (months)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">6-month survival (&#x0025;)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">129(53)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">169(40)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">41.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22(7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ECOG performance status score</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;0-1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">125(39)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93(29)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">48.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;3-4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">102(32)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Primary tumor</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Breast, prostate or kidney</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83(26)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Other</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">237(74)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Number of active tumors</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87(27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">233(73)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">43.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Albumin (g/dl)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;3.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">155(52)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">69.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;2.4-3.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">114(38)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;2.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30(10)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21(7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age (years)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003E;60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81(25)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">51.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">239(75)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Liver metastases</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;No</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">254(79)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66(21)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Bone-only metastases</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;No</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">270(84)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">49.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50(16)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Recent hospitalization</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;No</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">113(35)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">207(65)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">40.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Lines of palliative chemotherapy &#x2265;2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;No</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">281(88)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">39(12)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-mco-0-0-02095" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption><p>Cox multivariable analysis.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variables</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; confidence interval</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Primary tumor site (breast, kidney, or prostate vs. other)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.24-4.86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Number of active tumors (1-5 vs. &#x2265;6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.04-4.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ECOG performance status score (0-1 vs. 2 vs. 3-4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.85-2.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Serum albumin (&#x2265;3.4 vs. 2.4-3.3 vs. &#x003C;2.4 g/dl)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.22-1.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Liver metastasis (no vs. yes)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.09-2.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NLR (&#x2264;4 vs. &#x003E;4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.01-1.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Prior hospitalizations within the last 3 months (0 vs. &#x2265;1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.78-1.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Metastasis location (bone only vs. other)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.62-1.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">No. of prior palliative chemotherapy courses (0-1 vs. &#x2265;2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.98</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.65-1.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age (&#x2264;60 years vs. &#x003E;60 years)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.81-1.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.98</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
