Introduction

Oncology Letters

1792-1074 1792-1082

D.A. Spandidos

10.3892/ol.2020.12054

OL-0-0-12054

Articles

A novel definition of microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: Angiogenesis plus vasculogenic mimicry

Yanyuan

1 * Du

Kun

2 * Guan

Wenbin

3 * Wu

1 Tang

Haixiao

1 Wang

Ning

4 Qi

Jun

1 Gu

Zhengqin

1 Yang

Junyao

2 Ding

Jie

1Department of Urology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China 2Department of Laboratory, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China 3Department of Pathology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China 4Department of Urology, The People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, P.R. China

Correspondence to: Dr Jie Ding, Department of Urology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, 1665 Kongcojiang Road, Yangpu, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China, E-mail: dingjie@xinhuamed.com.cn Dr Junyao Yang, Department of Laboratory, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, 1665 Kongcojiang Road, Yangpu, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China, E-mail: yangjunyao@xinhuamed.com.cn *

Contributed equally

11 2020

03 09 2020

20 5

192

05012020 19062020

2020

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The present study proposed the novel concept of total microvessel density (TMVD), which is the combination of the MVD and the vasculogenic mimicry (VM) status, and evaluated its clinical significance in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). For that purpose, tumor samples from 183 patients with primary RCC were examined by CD34 single or periodic acid Schiff (PAS)/CD34 dual histology staining. MVD and VM were determined according to previous literature. Clinical information (tumor stage and grade, and duration of survival) was retrieved and analyzed. Survival information and VM-associated gene expression data of patients with RCC were also retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the clinical significance of each individual gene was analyzed. The results indicated that MVD exhibited obvious differences among patients with RCC; however, it was not correlated with the stage/grade or length of survival in patients with RCC. In total, 81 patients (44.3%) were CD34(−)/PAS(+) and defined as VM(+), and they had a significantly shorter survival compared with that of VM(−) patients (P=0.0002). VM was not associated with MVD. TMVD was able to distinguish between patients with high and low MVD in terms of survival, thus TMVD was better compared with MVD alone at distinguishing between patients with different survival prognoses. TCGA data analysis revealed that among the VM-associated genes, nodal growth differentiation factor, caspase-3, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and galectin-3 had a statistically significant impact on the overall/disease-free survival of patients with RCC. In conclusion, the TMVD concept may be more appropriate and sensitive compared with the MVD or VM alone in predicting tumor aggressiveness and patient survival, particularly in RCC, which is a highly vascularized, VM-rich neoplasm, and certain VM formation-associated genes are negatively associated with the survival of patients with RCC.

microvessel density vasculogenic mimicry immunohistochemical staining renal cell carcinoma TCGA database

Introduction

Angiogenesis, which is the development of new blood vessels from existing vasculature, is a major driving force in numerous types of malignancy by delivering oxygen and nutrients for the growth of tumors (1), while facilitating fast metastasis (2). First introduced by Folkman as a potential target for cancer treatment (3), angiogenesis was thereafter considered an essential pathologic feature and sustaining element of cancer, which has a key role in tumor dissemination/metastasis (4). Therefore, it appears reasonable to predict that the extent of tumor vascularity, measured by the pathological microvessel density (MVD), may be closely associated with the aggressiveness of a tumor (5), including its invasive and metastatic potential. MVD is usually defined by the following equation:

MVD (hotspot)=Individual microvessels (number)/area

The endothelial cell or endothelial cell cluster that was clearly separated from adjacent microvessels, tumor cells and other connective tissue elements was considered a single, countable microvessel (6). An inverse association between MVD and patient survival has been reported for several malignancies, including breast cancer (7) and melanoma (8), as well as prostate (9) and bladder (10) cancer. Previous studies have indicated that the MVD was correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, which is also a crucial factor in the vascular biology of multiple tumors as a mediator of angiogenesis. In the field of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is a highly vascularized solid tumor type (11), anti-angiogenic agents targeting VEGF/VEGF receptor, such as sunitinib, pazopalib and bevacizumab, have been the standard first-line therapy for years; however, they provide a limited benefit and metastatic RCC remains a challenge (12), which suggests that there may be an alternative blood supply besides angiogenesis. Of note, intra-tumoral MVD has been a controversial prognostic predictor for RCC. Nativ et al (13) and Fukata et al (14) reported that higher MVD is associated with shorter survival in RCC. Similarly, other studies have demonstrated this association in patients with ccRCC (15–17). Some of the studies found other associations. For example, Paradis et al (18) and Zhang et al (19) reported a positive association between MVD and VEGF expression levels, and Tuna et al (20) reported positive association between MVD and mast cell infiltration. Notably, Slaton et al (21) reported no significant correlation between MVD and VEGF, Mohseni et al (22) reported lack of correlation between MVD and mast cell infiltration, while others reported a lack of correlation between MVD and survival (23–26). On the contrary, numerous studies (27–32) have reported higher MVD associated with longer survival, and Yoshino et al (33) and Sabo et al (34) also reported this association in patients with low-stage RCC. Delanunt et al (35) reported this association in ccRCC, and Sharaml et al (36) reported this tendency yet the P-value was 0.1. Sandlund et al (37) reported this trend in 2006, but one year later they switched the marker from CD105 to CD31 and found the association disappeared (38). As for the association with stage or grade, Köhler et al (39) reported a negative association between MVD and stage, Hemmerlein et al (40) and Baldewijns et al (41) reported a negative association between MVD and Fuhrman grade and Kavantzas et al (42) reported positive association between MVD and grade, while Sharma et al (43) reported no association. Therefore, plethora of literature makes the current understanding of MVD in the setting of RCC controversial (Table I).

Microvessel or microvasculature is defined as ‘the smallest system of blood vessels in a body, including those responsible for microcirculation, that distribute blood within tissues’ (44). Besides angiogenesis, there is an alternative perfusion source termed ‘vasculogenic mimicry’ (VM), also referred to as ‘vascular mimicry’. The initial study and molecular characterization of VM was conducted in melanoma (45). Later, VM was also assessed in breast cancer (46) and hepatic carcinoma (47). Of note, the results of these studies agreed with those of earlier studies suggesting the perfusion of tumors via non-endothelial-lined channels. Since VM may also serve as a supply system of blood including nutrients, the concept of MVD may require to be modified, as the current understanding of the complexity of vasculature, either endothelium- or tumor cell-derived, improves over the years. Therefore, the present study proposed a modified version of MVD, referred to as total MVD (TMVD), which incorporates the number of MVD and the status of VM, and was defined as follows:

TMVD=Individual microvessel (number)/area + VM

In the present study, the capability of MVD, VM and TMVD in predicting prognosis of patients with RCC was evaluated and compared, and a bioinformatics analysis of the possible genes underlying the clinical significance of VM was performed.

Materials and methods <sec> <title>Patients and clinical data

A retrospective study was performed involving 183 patients with histopathologically verified RCC who underwent nephrectomy between January 2006 and December 2016 at Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine (Shanghai, China). The cohort had a median age of 59.3±7.0 years (range, 44–73 years) and comprised 104 males and 79 females. The pre-operative radiological evaluation consisted of chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT. None of the patients received irradiation or chemotherapy prior to surgery. The follow-up comprised of chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography or CT scan. The macroscopic and histological features of RCC were assessed, including tumor stage and Fuhrman nuclear grade (26). The tumor stage was defined according to the 2010 TNM classification (48). At presentation, the tumor stage was pT1 in 73, pT2 in 80 and pT3 in 30 cases, and the Fuhrman grade was I in 58, II in 90, III in 29 and IV in 6 umors. The follow-up program included clinical and radiological examinations. The median follow-up time from diagnosis was 53.9±19.0 months (range, 11–94 months) for surviving patients. The survival time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or latest follow-up. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital (Shanghai, China; approval no. XHEC-D-2016-061). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee due to the retrospective nature of this study. The overall/disease-free survival time and gene sequencing data of another 537 patients with RCC were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/), the Kidney RCC cohort (TCGA, provisional) using cBioPortal (https://www.cbioportal.org/). Survival time was evaluated based on individual gene expression levels.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC was performed on conventional 5-µm-thick histological paraffin-embedded tissue serial RCC sections on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides. After heat-drying, the sections were deparaffinized in xylene and sequentially rehydrated in gradients of ethanol, and next incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-CD34 antibody (cat. no. ab81289; 1:100 dilution; Abcam). Signals were amplified with the VECTASTAIN^® ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc.). At ×200 magnification, most of the slides had CD34-positive stain and those without any CD34 signal were considered invalid and restained. Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining was performed using a PAS kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) according to the manufacturer's protocol on one of the CD34-stained slides. Sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, coverslips were mounted with Permount Mounting Medium and samples were observed using an Olympus IX73 microscope (Olympus, Corp.). For the negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with non-immune human serum (cat. no. 31876; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

MVD quantification and VM identification

MVD was assessed according to consensus guidelines (49) independently by two pathologists by counting individual microvessels in 5 fields at a magnification of ×200 in a highly vascular tumor area (hot spot), excluding areas with prominent hyalinization and necrosis. Microvessels were defined as any CD34-positive endothelial or endothelial cell cluster with or without a viable lumen. In tumors exhibiting a dense microvasculature network, each branch was interpreted as a single vessel. Large anastomosing sinusoidal vessels were counted as single vessels. Only vessels distinct from one another were counted separately. Large vessels with thick muscular walls were excluded from counting. For each tumor, the mean number of microvessels counted in five fields at ×200 magnification was considered as the MVD value, which is a number without unit (50). For CD34/PAS dual-stained slides, VM was defined as any CD34-negative/PAS-positive closed area.

Statistical analysis

Values were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean, while in figures MVD were shown in box and whisker plots as minimum to maximum using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Statistical analyses involved Student's t-test, one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni's post hoc test, the χ² test and the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. The analyses were conducted with SPSS 22 (IBM Corp.) or GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). In the survival analysis, when two Kaplan-Meier curves crossed, Cox time-dependent covariate analysis was used for adjustment of the P-value. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results <sec> <title>MVD is not associated with the stage or grade of RCC

IHC staining for CD34 was performed on the RCC samples. By microscopic observation under ×200 magnification, MVD in a hotspot area was able to be classified into low (between 20 and 30; Fig. 1A), moderate (between 40 and 50; Fig. 1B) and high (between 60 and 80; Fig. 1C). The mean MVD was calculated to be 44.9±12.4. Regarding different stages, the mean MVD was 43.5±10.0 for stage 1, 46.3±13.6 for stage 2 and 44.8±14.2 for stage 3 (Fig. 1D). The mean MVD for different grades was 42.6±10.9 for grade 1, 46.2±12.4 for grade 2 and 45.5±14.3 for grades 3/4 (Fig. 1E). There was no significant difference in MVD between the different stages or grades, and no increasing or decreasing tendency was observed either. The results of Fig. 1 suggested a weak association between MVD and the stage/grade.

VM exhibits a tendency to increase in patients with advanced-stage/grade RCC

CD34/PAS dual staining was performed on serial RCC sections in order to identify the VM structure. Based on CD34 expression, the slides were classified into VM(−), which corresponded to a CD34(+)/PAS(+) status (Fig. 2A), and VM(+), which was defined by the presence of a CD34(−)/PAS(+) enclosed channel that was lined by tumor cells rather than endothelial cells (Fig. 2B). Patients were stratified based on their VM(+) or VM(−) status. By further stratifying the patients based on their stage/grade information, it was observed that, although there was a higher proportion of VM(+) patients in stage 3 compared with those in stage 1 (P=0.0292; Fig. 2C), the differences between stage 1 and 2 or stage 2 and 3 were not statistically significant. Similarly, a higher proportion of VM(+) patients was present in the grade 3/4 group than in the grade 1 group (P=0.0325; Fig. 2D). There was no difference in MVD between patients with VM(+) and VM(−) according to Student's t-test (P=0.4785; Fig. 2E). The patients were then stratified into high or low MVD groups and it was observed that there was no difference in the VM(+) ratio between patients with high or low MVD in their tumor according to the c² test (P=0.2625; Fig. 2F).

Survival analysis of genes closely associated with the formation of VM

To clarify why the phenotype of VM was reported to be closely associated with the survival of patients with RCC (51,52), the present study attempted to identify the potentially associated genes using TCGA database via cBioPortal. Previous studies reported several genes closely associated with the formation of VM, including vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin (also known as CDH5), vimentin (VIM) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (53–55). The clinical data from a large sample were retrieved from TCGA database and the survival length of patients with RCC was analyzed based on the expression levels of those VM-associated genes. Among them, certain genes had a significant negative impact on overall/disease-free survival, including nodal growth differentiation factor (NODAL), caspase-3 (CASP3), MMP9 and galectin-3 (GAL3) (Fig. 3A-H, respectively). Of the two genes that are known to be closely linked to VM, high VE-cadherin was unexpectedly associated with a longer overall survival (P=0.018; Fig. 3I), but not disease-free survival (P=0.494; Fig. 3J). VIM, a well-known oncogene (56,57), had a significant negative effect on overall survival (P=0.0092; Fig. 3K) and disease-free survival (P=3.92×10⁻⁷; Fig. 3L).

VM rather than MVD is able to distinguish patients with different survival prognoses, while TMVD demonstrates superior discriminating capability

Upon dividing the patients into two groups based on their MVD levels, there was no significant difference between the survival time of patients with high or low MVD (P=0.348; Fig. 4A), although the survival time had a tendency to be shorter in patients with higher MVD. Stratification of the patients based on their VM status indicated that VM(+) patients had a significantly shorter survival time (P=0.0002; Fig. 4B), demonstrating an inverse association between VM and survival. By applying the TMVD concept, those patients were further stratified into four subgroups. Comparison of the survival curves of these four subgroups indicated that this stratification was able to distinguish patients with different survival prognoses (Fig. 4C). Among patients with a lower MVD, VM(−) patients exhibited significant longer survival than VM(+) patients (P=0.0076); and among patients with a higher MVD, VM(−) patients also had a significantly longer survival time than VM(+) patients (P=0.0093). Of note, patients with a lower MVD combined with a VM(+) status had an even poorer prognosis than those with a higher MVD combined with a VM(−) status (P=0.039).

Discussion

MVD assessment is the most commonly used technique to quantify intratumoral angiogenesis in cancer. It was first developed by Weidner et al (58) in 1991, who used panendothelial IHC staining of blood microvessels. The first step was the identification of the area with the highest neovessel density (the so-called ‘hot spot’). Individual microvessels were then counted at higher power (magnification, ×200) in an adequate area (e.g., 0.74 mm² per field using a 20× objective lens and a 10× ocular lens). Any stained endothelial cells or clusters separated from adjacent vessels were counted as single microvessels. Despite numerous reports of the clinical prognostic significance of MVD in various types of tumor, its predictive value regarding outcomes in RCC remains controversial, as summarized in Table I. Some of them reported negative correlation between MVD and prognosis (higher MVD correlated with shorter survival) (13–17), some reported positive correlation (27–32) and others reported no significance (21,23–26,38). This may be associated with several non-mechanistic factors, including sample size, sampling bias, different blood vessel markers (such as the more commonly used CD34 or CD31, or the less frequently used FVIII Rag or CD105), the quality of IHC staining, the methods of vasculature quantification and the methods of interpretation. For instance, Sandlund et al (59) reported in 2006 that a higher MVD was associated with longer survival; however, when CD31 was used as the vessel marker instead of CD105, no association with survival was observed (60). Due to the heterogeneity in methodology among these studies, a forest plot may be unpractical and unreasonable. Another possible reason is the different categories of blood vessels. Yao et al (61) proposed that, within clear-cell RCC, there are at least two major categories of blood vessels with contrasting prognostic implications, namely undifferentiated vessels (expressing CD31 but not CD34) and differentiated vessels (expressing both CD31 and CD34), with a higher undifferentiated vessel density indicating poorer prognosis and higher differentiated vessel density correlating with better prognosis. Qian et al (62) also discussed the complexity of tumor vasculature in RCC and recent studies on the concept of vessel co-option (a non-angiogenic process through which tumor cells utilize pre-existing tissue blood vessels to support tumor growth, survival and metastasis) have been published (63–65), thus obscuring whether MVD is a sufficient prognostic factor.

VM is the formation of fluid-conducting channels by highly invasive and genetically dysregulated tumor cells and acts as a complementary source of blood supply. In the present study, TMVD (i.e., MVD plus VM status) demonstrated a better prognosis-predicting capability compared with that of the MVD or VM alone (Fig. 4C), which may be explained by the fact that endothelium-lined blood vessels as well as VM are able to transfer blood, nutrients and oxygen, and theoretically, both may facilitate cancer progression. It is reasonable to assume that during treatment with an anti-angiogenic regimen, when neo-angiogenesis is suppressed, tumor growth may be more dependent on the supply from VM. A comprehensive meta-analysis review by Yang et al (66) revealed that VM is associated with unfavorable prognosis in >10 different types of tumor, and with cancer differentiation, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. In other words, VM is not only functional as a delivering channel, but is in itself is a hallmark of potent proliferation and metastasizing capability. Survival analysis of VM-associated genes, including NODAL, CASP3, MMP9 and GAL3, revealed that these genes had a negative impact on overall and disease-free survival in the setting of RCC based on TCGA database. In addition, several studies have been published demonstrating that the above genes also contribute to angiogenesis (67–70). The single most important factor in VM, VE-cadherin, has been indicated to regulate angiogenesis (71) and the single most important factor in angiogenesis, VEGF, has also been reported to promote VM (72). Taken together, angiogenesis and VM may promote tumor progression independently and probably interdependently (Fig. 4D and E). One of the limitations of the present study is that the association between the above-mentioned genes, VM formation and patient survival was not assessed in the present cohort, and therefore, it was not possible to experimentally clarify certain paradoxical results of the bioinformatics analysis, including higher VE-cadherin being associated with longer overall survival.

When the concept of TMVD was proposed, it was expected to be the sum of MVD and VM density, but in reality, the quantification of VM density, if it is able to be quantitated, is rather difficult. The identification process relies greatly on visual observation. If red blood cells (RBCs) are present inside a CD34(−)/PAS(+) area, it is easier to confirm, while the absence of RBCs inside such an area complicates the identification, since PAS staining may not be well demarked. Instead of calculating its density, the status of VM (positive or negative) was incorporated into the formula of TMVD in the present study. Generally speaking, among the four groups classified according to TMVD, the prognosis of patients with low MVD(≤45)/VM(+) was the best, that of patients with high MVD(>45)/VM(−) and low MVD(≤45)/VM(+) was intermediate and that of patients with high MVD(>45)/VM(+) was the worst. The clinical significance and cost-effectiveness of this novel concept of TMVD require to be further investigated, not only in the setting of RCC, but also in other cancer types in which VM may have a critical role. Recently, novel combinational therapy targeting other molecules, including programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PDL1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), has demonstrated promising efficiency (73–75). With more clinical trials ongoing, it is possible that checkpoint immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenesis therapy may be adopted as the first-line treatment for metastatic RCC, and PD1/PDL1/CTLA-4 expression levels, and perhaps other gene expression levels (76–79), combined with TMVD may provide higher accuracy in predicting patient prognosis.

In conclusion, the present study examined the novel concept of TMVD, which is a combination of MVD and VM status, and evaluated its capability in predicting prognosis in patients with RCC compared to that of MVD or VM alone. TMVD demonstrated superior predictive capability, and together with the results of the TCGA data analysis, the present results suggested that angiogenesis and VM promote tumor progression independently and probably interdependently.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (grant nos. 81970657 and 81802522) and the Shanghai Sailing Program (grant no. 18YF1415200).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JQ, ZG, JY and JD designed the study. JY and JD supervised the whole process. YW, KD, WG, DW, HT and NW performed the research, among which WG and JY conducted the IHC staining. YW and KD analyzed the data. YW and JD wrote the manuscript. ZG and JD revised the statistics and the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital (Shanghai, China; approval no. XHEC-D-2016-061). The requirement of informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References 1

Folkman

Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease

Nat Med127311995

10.1038/nm0195-27

7584949

Folkman

Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis

Semin Oncol29(6 Suppl 16)S15S182002

10.1053/sonc.2002.37263

Folkman

Anti-angiogenesis: New concept for therapy of solid tumors

Ann Surg1754094161972

10.1097/00000658-197203000-00014

5077799

Carmeliet

Jain

Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases

Nature4072492572000

10.1038/35025220

11001068

Hlatky

Hahnfeldt

Folkman

Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: Microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us

J Natl Cancer Inst948838932002

10.1093/jnci/94.12.883

12072542

Tae

El-Naggar

Yoo

Feng

Lee

Hong

Hittelman

Shin

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in head and neck tumorigenesis

Clin Cancer Res6282128282000

10914730

Zhou

Cheng

Wang

Zhang

Pang

Evaluation of protein pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) and microvessel density (MVD) as prognostic indicators in breast cancer

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol136171917272010

10.1007/s00432-010-0830-y

20229034

Pastushenko

Vermeulen

Carapeto

Van den Eynden

Rutten

Ara

Dirix

Van Laere

Blood microvessel density, lymphatic microvessel density and lymphatic invasion in predicting melanoma metastases: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Br J Dermatol17066772014

10.1111/bjd.12688

24134623

Miyata

Sakai

Reconsideration of the clinical and histopathological significance of angiogenesis in prostate cancer: Usefulness and limitations of microvessel density measurement

Int J Urol228068152015

10.1111/iju.12840

26153072

Huang

Chen

Liu

Zhang

Minmin

Nie

Zhang

Liu

Microvessel density as a prognostic factor in bladder cancer: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis

Cancer Biomark145055142014

10.3233/CBM-140417

25335742

Aziz

Sznol

Adeniran

Colberg

Camp

Kluger

Vascularity of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma specimens

J Transl Med11152013

10.1186/1479-5876-11-15

23316728

Derosa

Bayar

Albiges

Le Teuff

Escudier

A new prognostic model for survival in second line for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Development and external validation

Angiogenesis223833952019

10.1007/s10456-019-09664-2

30739258

Nativ

Sabo

Reiss

Wald

Madjar

Moskovitz

Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma

Urology516936961998

10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00019-3

9610581

Fukata

Inoue

Kamada

Kawada

Furihata

Ohtsuki

Shuin

Levels of angiogenesis and expression of angiogenesis-related genes are prognostic for organ-specific metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

Cancer1039319422005

10.1002/cncr.20887

15685621

Joo

Kim

Lee

Kim

Increased expression of caveolin-1 and microvessel density correlates with metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BJU Int932912962004

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04604.x

14764125

Minardi

Lucarini

Filosa

Milanese

Zizzi

Di Primio

Montironi

Muzzonigro

Prognostic role of tumor necrosis, microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha in patients with clear cell renal carcinoma after radical nephrectomy in a long term follow-up

Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol214474552008

10.1177/039463200802100225

18547492

Iakovlev

Gabril

Dubinski

Scorilas

Youssef

Faragalla

Kovacs

Rotondo

Metias

Arsanious

Microvascular density as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in renal cell carcinoma: An automated image analysis study

Lab Invest9246562012

10.1038/labinvest.2011.153

22042086

Paradis

Lagha

Zeimoura

Blanchet

Eschwege

Benoît

Jardin

Bedossa

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in renal cell carcinomas

Virchows Arch4363513562000

10.1007/s004280050458

10834538

Zhang

Yamashita

Uetsuki

Kakehi

Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: Evaluation of microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases

Int J Urol95095142002

10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00511.x

12410931

Tuna

Yorukoglu

Unlu

Mungan

Kirkali

Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas

Eur Urol505305342006

10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.040

16426730

Slaton

Inoue

Perrotte

El-Naggar

Swanson

Fidler

Dinney

Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage of renal cell carcinoma

Am J Pathol1587357432001

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64016-3

11159211

Mohseni

Mohammadi

Heshmat

Kosari

Meysamie

The lack of correlation between mast cells and microvessel density with pathologic feature of renal cell carcinoma

Int Urol Nephrol421091122010

10.1007/s11255-009-9577-2

19449120

MacLennan

Bostwick

Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma: Lack of prognostic significance

Urology4627301995

10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80153-8

7604476

Gelb

Sudilovsky

Weiss

Medeiros

Appraisal of intratumoral microvessel density, MIB-1 score, DNA content, and p53 protein expression as prognostic indicators in patients with locally confined renal cell carcinoma

Cancer80176817751997

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1768::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-3

9351546

Suzuki

Morita

Hashimoto

Tokue

Thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) associated with prognosis in renal cell carcinoma

Urol Res297122001

10.1007/s002400000154

11310220

Minardi

Lucarini

Mazzucchelli

Milanese

Natali

Galosi

Montironi

Biagini

Muzzonigro

Prognostic role of fuhrman grade and vascular endothelial growth factor in pT1a clear cell carcinoma in partial nephrectomy specimens

J Urol174120812122005

10.1097/01.ju.0000173078.57871.2d

16145371

Anastassiou

Duensing

Steinhoff

Zorn

Grosse

Dallmann

Kirchner

Ganser

Atzpodien

Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1): A potential prognostic marker involved in leukocyte infiltration of renal cell carcinoma

Oncology531271321996

10.1159/000227548

8604238

Rioux-Leclercq

Epstein

Bansard

Turlin

Patard

Manunta

Chan

Ramee

Lobel

Moulinoux

Clinical significance of cell proliferation, microvessel density, and CD44 adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinoma

Hum Pathol32120912152001

10.1053/hupa.2001.28957

11727260

Yagasaki

Kawata

Takimoto

Nemoto

Histopathological analysis of angiogenic factors in renal cell carcinoma

Int J Urol102202272003

10.1046/j.0919-8172.2003.00608.x

12657102

Imao

Egawa

Takashima

Koshida

Namiki

Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma

Int J Urol119489532004

10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00931.x

15509196

Mertz

Demichelis

Kim

Schraml

Storz

Diener

Moch

Rubin

Automated immunofluorescence analysis defines microvessel area as a prognostic parameter in clear cell renal cell cancer

Hum Pathol38145414622007

10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.017

17889675

Yildiz

Ayan

Goze

Gokce

Gultekin

Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma

BJU Int1017587642008

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07318.x

18070177

Yoshino

Kato

Okada

Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell carcinoma

Int J Urol21561601995

10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00445.x

8536130

Sabo

Boltenko

Sova

Stein

Kleinhaus

Resnick

Microscopic analysis and significance of vascular architectural complexity in renal cell carcinoma

Clin Cancer Res75335372001

11297244

Delahunt

Bethwaite

Thornton

Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Br J Urol804014041997

10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00374.x

9313657

Schraml

Struckmann

Hatz

Sonnet

Kully

Gasser

Sauter

Mihatsch

Moch

VHL mutations and their correlation with tumour cell proliferation, microvessel density, and patient prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

J Pathol1961861932002

10.1002/path.1034

11793370

Sandlund

Hedberg

Bergh

Grankvist

Ljungberg

Rasmuson

Endoglin (CD105) expression in human renal cell carcinoma

BJU Int977067102006

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06006.x

16536758

Sandlund

Hedberg

Bergh

Grankvist

Ljungberg

Rasmuson

Evaluation of CD31 (PECAM-1) expression using tissue microarray in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Tumor Biol281581642007

10.1159/000102980

Köhler

Barth

Siebel

Gerharz

Bittinger

Quantitative assessment of vascular surface density in renal cell carcinomas

Br J Urol776506541996

10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.08544.x

8689104

Hemmerlein

Kugler

Özisik

Ringert

Radzun

Thelen

Vascular endothelial growth factor expression, angiogenesis, and necrosis in renal cell carcinomas

Virchows Arch4396456522001

10.1007/s004280100464

11764385

Baldewijns

Thijssen

Van den Eynden

Van Laere

Bluekens

Roskams

van Poppel

De Bruïne

Griffioen

Vermeulen

High-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma has a higher angiogenic activity than low-grade renal cell carcinoma based on histomorphological quantification and qRT-PCR mRNA expression profile

Br J Cancer96188818952007

10.1038/sj.bjc.6603796

17505508

Kavantzas

Paraskevakou

Tseleni-Balafouta

Aroni

Athanassiades

Agrogiannis

Patsouris

Association between microvessel density and histologic grade in renal cell carcinomas

Pathol Oncol Res131451482007

10.1007/BF02893490

17607376

Sharma

Aggarwal

Gupta

Singh

Gupta

Dinda

Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: Correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors

Int Urol Nephrol431251292011

10.1007/s11255-010-9779-7

20535637

Weidner

Intratumor microvessel density as a prognostic factor in cancer

Am J Pathol14791995

7541613

Maniotis

Folberg

Hess

Seftor

Gardner

Pe'er

Trent

Meltzer

Hendrix

Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: Vasculogenic mimicry

Am J Pathol1557397521999

10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65173-5

10487832

Shirakawa

Kobayashi

Heike

Kawamoto

Brechbiel

Kasumi

Iwanaga

Konishi

Terada

Wakasugi

Hemodynamics in vasculogenic mimicry and angiogenesis of inflammatory breast cancer xenograft

Cancer Res625605662002

11809710

Sun

Zhang

Guo

Zhao

Zhang

Hao

Vasculogenic mimicry is associated with high tumor grade, invasion and metastasis, and short survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Oncol Rep166936982006

16969481

Lee

Byun

Kim

Kwak

Hong

Outcomes of pathologic stage T3a renal cell carcinoma up-staged from small renal tumor: Emphasis on partial nephrectomy

BMC Cancer184272018

10.3390/cancers10110427

29661179

Nowak-Sliwinska

Alitalo

Allen

Anisimov

Aplin

Auerbach

Augustin

Bates

van Beijnum

Bender

RHF

Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays

Angiogenesis214255322018

10.1007/s10456-018-9613-x

29766399

Feng

Song

Shang

Chen

Wang

Pang

Wang

REDD1 overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma may predict poor prognosis and correlates with high microvessel density

Oncol Lett194314412020

31897156

Vartanian

Stepanova

Gutorov

Solomko

Grigorieva

Sokolova

Baryshnikov

Lichinitser

Prognostic significance of periodic acid-Schiff-positive patterns in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Can J Urol16472647322009

19671223

Zhang

Sun

Zhao

Liu

Wang

Yao

Dong

Chi

Clinical significances and prognostic value of cancer stem-like cells markers and vasculogenic mimicry in renal cell carcinoma

J Surg Oncol1084144192013

10.1002/jso.23402

23996537

Qiao

Liang

Zhang

Xie

Liu

Tian

Advanced research on vasculogenic mimicry in cancer

J Cell Mol Med193153262015

10.1111/jcmm.12496

25598425

Paulis

Soetekouw

Verheul

Tjan-Heijnen

Griffioen

Signalling pathways in vasculogenic mimicry

Biochim Biophys Acta180618282010

20079807

Kirschmann

Seftor

Hardy

Seftor

Hendrix

Molecular pathways: Vasculogenic mimicry in tumor cells: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Clin Cancer Res18272627322012

10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3237

22474319

Bai

Yeh

Qiu

Zeng

Cai

Zuo

Yang

Chang

TR4 nuclear receptor promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation and metastasis via altering the miR490-3p/vimentin signals

Oncogene37590159122018

10.1038/s41388-018-0269-1

29973687

Sabo

Miselevich

Bejar

Segenreich

Wald

Moskovitz

Nativ

The role of vimentin expression in predicting the long-term outcome of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma

Br J Urol808648681997

10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.00489.x

9439398

Weidner

Semple

Welch

Folkman

Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma

N Engl J Med324181991

10.1056/NEJM199101033240101

1701519

Sandlund

Hedberg

Bergh

Grankvist

Ljungberg

Rasmuson

Endoglin (CD105) expression in human renal cell carcinoma

BJU Int977067102006

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06006.x

16536758

Sandlund

Hedberg

Bergh

Grankvist

Ljungberg

Rasmuson

Evaluation of CD31 (PECAM-1) expression using tissue microarray in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Tumour Biol281581642007

10.1159/000102980

17510564

Yao

Qian

Zhang

Tan

Kort

Yang

Resau

The

Two distinct types of blood vessels in clear cell renal cell carcinoma have contrasting prognostic implications

Clin Cancer Res131611692007

10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0774

17200351

Qian

Huang

Wondergem

Teh

Complexity of tumor vasculature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Cancer115(10 Suppl)S2282S22892009

10.1002/cncr.24238

Kuczynski

Reynolds

Vessel co-option and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy

Angiogenesis2355742020

10.1007/s10456-019-09698-6

31865479

Kuczynski

Vermeulen

Pezzella

Kerbel

Reynolds

Vessel co-option in cancer

Nat Rev Clin Oncol164694932019

10.1038/s41571-019-0181-9

30816337

Latacz

Caspani

Barnhill

Lugassy

Verhoef

Grünhagen

Van Laere

Moro

Gerling

Dirix

Pathological features of vessel co-option versus sprouting angiogenesis

Angiogenesis2343542020

10.1007/s10456-019-09690-0

31655928

Yang

Liao

Mai

Xie

Qiang

Zheng

Wang

Mei

Meng

Tumor vasculogenic mimicry predicts poor prognosis in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Angiogenesis191912002016

10.1007/s10456-016-9500-2

26899730

Hueng

Lin

Huang

Liu

Chen

Sytwu

Chang

Huang

Yeh

Inhibition of Nodal suppresses angiogenesis and growth of human gliomas

J Neurooncol10421312011

10.1007/s11060-010-0467-3

21116837

Feng

Cheng

Gong

Zhang

Yang

Liu

Dying glioma cells establish a proangiogenic microenvironment through a caspase 3 dependent mechanism

Cancer Lett38512202017

10.1016/j.canlet.2016.10.042

27826040

Bekes

Schweighofer

Kupriyanova

Zajac

Ardi

Quigley

Deryugina

Tumor-recruited neutrophils and neutrophil TIMP-free MMP-9 regulate coordinately the levels of tumor angiogenesis and efficiency of malignant cell intravasation

Am J Pathol179145514702011

10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.031

21741942

Jia

Kidoya

Yamakawa

Naito

Takakura

Galectin-3 accelerates M2 macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis in tumors

Am J Pathol182182118312013

10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.017

23499465

Bentley

Franco

Philippides

Blanco

Dierkes

Gebala

Stanchi

Jones

Aspalter

Cagna

The role of differential VE-cadherin dynamics in cell rearrangement during angiogenesis

Nat Cell Biol163093212014

10.1038/ncb2926

24658686

Wang

Sun

Zhao

Zhang

Wang

Zhao

Qie

Sun

Functional significance of VEGF-a in human ovarian carcinoma: Role in vasculogenic mimicry

Cancer Biol Ther77587662008

10.4161/cbt.7.5.5765

18376140

Motzer

Tannir

McDermott

Arén Frontera

Melichar

Choueiri

Plimack

Barthélémy

Porta

George

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in advanced renal-cell carcinoma

N Engl J Med378127712902018

10.1056/NEJMoa1712126

29562145

Powles

Albiges

Staehler

Bensalah

Dabestani

Giles

Hofmann

Hora

Kuczyk

Lam

Updated european association of urology guidelines recommendations for the treatment of first-line metastatic clear cell renal cancer

Eur Urol733113152018

10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.016

29223605

Azuma

Sugihara

Honda

Yoshizaki

Niimi

Tsuru

Kume

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma regains sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor after nivolumab treatment: A case report

Oncol Lett17401140152019

30881514

Wei

Gan

Zhang

Han

Identification of key genes involved in the metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Oncol Lett17432143282019

30988807

Carlsson

Christiansen

Davidsson

Giunchi

Fiorentino

Sundqvist

The potential role of miR-126, miR-21 and miR-10b as prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma

Oncol Lett17456645742019

30988818

Gao

Sun

Decreased expression of TXNIP predicts poor prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Oncol Lett197637702020

31897192

Yan

Feng

Jiang

Sun

Liu

GRIM-19 deficiency promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression and is associated with high TNM stage and fuhrman grade

Oncol Lett19411541212020

32382350

Figure 1.

MVD is not associated with the stage or grade in patients with RCC. (A-C) CD34 immunohistochemical staining of clear-cell RCC samples. MVD within hotspots was classified as (A) low (20–30), (B) moderate (40–50) and (C) high (60–80) (scale bar, 10 µm). Each condition is demonstrated with two representative images. (D and E) Comparison of the mean MVD between different (D) stages and (E) grades. RCC, renal cell carcinoma; MVD, microvessel density.

Figure 2.

VM tends to increase in patients with high stage or grade. (A-C) CD34/PAS dual staining in serial ccRCC sections. (A and B) As indicated in representative histology images, (A) VM(−) was defined as CD34(+)/PAS(+) and (B) VM(+) was defined as CD34(−)/PAS(+) (scale bar, 10 µm). Each condition is demonstrated with two representative images. (C) Comparison of VM status between patients with early and advanced stage. (D) Comparison of VM status between patients with low and high grade (E) Comparison of MVD between VM(−) and VM(+) cases. (F) Comparison of VM status between patients with low and high MVD. Black arrows indicate CD34(+) and red arrows PAS(+). VM, vasculogenic mimicry; MVD, microvessel density; PAS, periodic acid Schiff; ns, no significance.

Figure 3.

Survival analysis of genes closely associated with the formation of vasculogenic mimicry, which also shorten the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma, from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The survival rate was expressed as the percentage. (A) Overall survival and (B) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low NODAL expression. Overall survival (C) Overall survival and (D) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low CASP3 expression. (E) Overall survival and (F) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low MMP9 expression. (G) Overall survival and (H) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low GAL3 expression. (I) Overall survival and (J) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low VE-cadherin expression. (K) Overall survival and (L) disease-free survival of patients with relatively high or low vimentin expression. EXP, expression; NODAL, nodal growth differentiation factor; CASP3, caspase 3; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; GAL3, galectin-3; VE-cadherin/CDH5, vascular endothelial cadherin; VIM, vimentin.

Figure 4.

VM rather than the MVD is able to distinguish patients with different survival prognoses, while the TMVD demonstrates superior discriminating capability compared with MVD. (A) Comparison of overall survival between patients with low and high MVD. The survival rate was expressed as the percentage. (B) Comparison of survival between VM(−) and VM(+) patients. (C) Comparison of survival between four different TMVD subgroups of patients. (D) Mechanistic diagram indicating the possible association between angiogenesis and VM via numerous associated genes. (E) Mechanistic scheme illustrating the function of angiogenesis and VM in supplying blood and promoting metastasis. VM, vasculogenic mimicry; TMVD, total microvessel density; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; NODAL, nodal growth differentiation factor; CASP3, caspase 3; MMP9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; GAL3, galectin-3; VE-cadherin, vascular endothelial cadherin.

Table I.

Review of previously published literature on the clinical significance of MVD in patients with RCC.

First author, year	Patients (n)	Marker	Stage/grade association	Clinical significance of higher MVD	(Refs.)
Yoshino, 1995	84	FVIII RAg	/	Longer survival for patients with T1-2 and M0 tumors	(33)
Maclennan, 1995	97	FVIII RAg	No association	Lack of clinical significance	(23)
Köhler, 1996	79	UEA I	Negative association with stage	/	(39)
Anastassiou, 1996	23	CD31	/	Longer survival	(27)
Delahunt, 1997	150	FVIII RAg	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival in ccRCC	(35)
Gelb 1997	52	FVIII Rag/CD31	/	Lack of clinical significance	(24)
Nativ, 1998	36	FVIII RAg	Negative association with grade	Shorter survival	(13)
Paradis, 2000	74	CD34	Negative association with grade (in ccRCC)	Positive correlation with VEGF	(18)
Hemmerlein, 2001	58	CD31	Negative association with grade	/	(40)
Sabo, 2001	49	CD34	/	Longer survival in low-stage ccRCC	(34)
Suzuki, 2001	56	CD34	No association	Lack of clinical significance	(25)
Slaton, 2001	46	CD34	No association	Lack of clinical significance/no correlation with VEGF	(21)
Rioux-Leclercq, 2001	73	CD34	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival	(28)
Zhang, 2002	70	CD31	No association	Positive correlation with VEGF	(19)
Schraml, 2002	113	CD34	/	Longer survival tendency (P=0.1)	(36)
Yagasaki, 2003	84	CD105	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival/negative correlation with VEGF	(29)
Imao, 2004	70	CD34	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival	(30)
Joo, 2004	67	CD34	Positive association with stage/negative with grade	Shorter survival in ccRCC	(15)
Fukata, 2005	54	CD34	/	Shortor survival/negative correlation with M/E ratio	(14)
Minardi, 2005	48	CD34	/	Lack of clinical significance	(26)
Tuna, 2006	71	CD31	/	Positive correlation with mast cell infiltratioin	(20)
Sandlund, 2006	168	CD105	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival	(37)
Sandlund, 2007	167	CD31	Negative association with stage/grade	Lack of clinical significance	(38)
Kavantzas, 2007	53	FVIII RAg	Positive association with grade	/	(42)
Mertz, 2007	284	CD34	/	Longer survival	(31)
Baldewijn 2007	150	CD34	Negative association with grade	/	(41)
Yildiz, 2008	54	CD34	Negative association with stage/grade	Longer survival	(32)
Minardi, 2008	50	CD34	No association	Shorter survival in ccRCC	(16)
Mohseni, 2010	40	CD34	/	No correlation with mast cell infiltration	(22)
Sharma, 2011	41	CD34	No association	/	(43)
Iakovlev, 2012	57	CD34	No association	Shorter survival in ccRCC	(17)

ccRCC, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma; MVD, microvessel density; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.