Macrophages can directly engulf aberrant cells in normal or non-tumor disease conditions and are therefore conventionally regarded as anti-carcinogenesis (1). Due to their extremely plastic phenotypes and highly dynamic functions, macrophages can be transformed into different subtypes that have been reported to differentially regulate tumor progression in the tumor microenvironment (TME) (2). According to the similarities in gene expression patterns and functions between TAMs and traditional M1- and M2-type macrophages, TAMs with mixed phenotypes are broadly divided into M1-like and M2-like TAMs. M2 macrophages can be further subdivided into M2a, M2b, M2c and M2d subtypes in response to different inducers in the TME (3) (Fig. 1).

M2a macrophages, induced by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, are characterized by the increased expression of mannose receptor CD206, decoy IL-1 receptor (IL-R) and C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL)17 (4). M2a macrophages associated with wound healing can contribute to tissue repair by secreting pro-fibrotic factors, such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and fibronectin (5) (Fig. 1). M2b macrophages induced by immune complexes (IC) and toll-like receptor (TLR)/IL-1R ligands are immune regulators (6). By inhibiting immune and inflammatory responses in cancer and infectious diseases, M2b can promote tumor development and parasite, bacterial and fungal infections (Fig. 1) (6). In addition, M2b can attenuate spinal cord injury and early reperfusion injury after myocardial ischemia in mice, and support recovery from the injuries (7). M2c induced by IL-10, TGF-β and glucocorticoids are acquired for the deactivation of macrophages, and participate in anti-inflammation responses, matrix deposition and tissue remodeling (8). The increased expression of the Mer receptor tyrosine kinase on M2c enables more efficient uptake of apoptotic cells compared with other macrophage subsets in an anti-inflammatory and pro-tumor manner (Fig. 1). M2d induced by IL-6, 8, 17, 18, leukemia inhibitory factor and adenosine are characterized by increased expression of IL-10, TGF-β inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and decreased expression of IL-12, TNF-α and IL-1β (9). The increased levels of VEGF, IL-10 and iNOS in M2d endow its abilities of tissue repair and angiogenesis that benefit the metastasis of tumor cells (10) (Fig. 1).

M2-like TAMs are the major component of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the TME. The predominate presence of M2-like TAMs in the TME is partially responsible for immunosuppression in tumor growth. Individuals with a high M1 to M2 ratio are less susceptible to tumors (11). The ratio of M1-like and M2-like TAMs in the TME is positively associated with the overall survival and prognosis of patients with uveal melanomas (12). By inhibiting the secretion of M1-like TAM-induced factor by epigenetically silencing aberrant DNA methylation, gastric cancer cells evade tumor immune surveillance during the transformation of benign cells into invasive cancer cells (13). The transformation from M2-like to M1-like TAMs under specific conditions results in the recession of lung cancer (14). Therefore, blocking the infiltration of macrophages, eliminating the accumulation of M2-like TAMs, re-polarizing predominant M2-like into M1-like TAMs or epigenetically silencing the secretion of M2-like TAM-induced factors in the TME may be potential candidate mechanisms for TAMs-targeted cancer immunotherapy. The present review summarizes current knowledge regarding the recruitment of macrophages, their polarization into M1-like or M2-like TAMs, and their differential roles in angiogenesis, angiostasis, invasion, metastasis and immune activity in the TME, which may offer valuable insight into how to improve the design of TAMs-targeted cancer immunotherapies. Some of these strategies show promising effects; however, challenges still remain (15).

In terms of anatomy, macrophages can be divided into tissue-resident and circulating monocytes-derived macrophages. Tissue-resident macrophages are hypothesized to be the first being reprogrammed by tumor cells into pro-tumoral M2-like TAMs. Subsequently, monocyte-derived macrophages are recruited and polarized into M2-like TAMs in the TME, which is critical for the establishment of metastatic and malignant tumors (16). Chemoattractants and their receptors that have been identified to recruit macrophages into the TME include: CCL2/CC receptor (R)2⁺, CCL2/CCR5⁺, IL-1β/IL-1R, VEGFA/VEGFR, colony-stimulating factor (CSF)1/CSFR and tyrosine-protein kinase receptor (Tie)/Angiogenin 2 (ANG2) (17). For example, CCL2 expressed by tumor cells and macrophages promotes the recruitment of CCR2⁺ monocytes and CCR5⁺ granulocytes into the TME, promoting tumor growth and metastasis (18). Among the chemoattractants CCL5, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 10, CXCL12 and complement C1q, the latter is the most potent attractant promoting M2-like TAMs recruitment (19).

Signaling pathways that function downstream of chemoattractant-receptor pairs for recruiting macrophages into TME include the TGF-β, PI3Kγ, TLR and mTOR pathways. TGF-β mediates the recruitment of macrophages that compete with dendritic cells (DCs), and decreases the antigen-presenting ability of DCs in the adaptive immune system in skin cancer, which result in the transformation of a regressing tumor into a progressing tumor (20). Periostin (POSTN), secreted by ovarian cancer cells, recruits macrophages into the tumor tissue, where macrophages further increase the expression of POSTN in ovarian cancer cells through the production of TGF-β. In turn, the increased expression of POSTN facilitates the recruitment of macrophages into the TME (21). Activation of the CSF1/CSF1R signaling axis enhances epidermal growth factor (EGF) expression, and promotes the recruitment of macrophages and the migration of epithelial cells in tumor tissues. Conversely, the inhibition of CSF1 receptor signaling abolishes TAM infiltration, enhances the recruitment of CD8⁺ T cells and reduces the growth of cervical and breast tumors (22).

The tropism of macrophages to hypoxia drives the migration and infiltration of macrophages into the hypoxic tumor compartments (23). This migration is halted by hypoxia-inducible transcription factor (HIF)-1α, when macrophages arrive in tumor compartments, where macrophages are polarized into hypoxic TAMs in order to promote tumor growth and metastasis (23). The pro-tumor function of hypoxic TAMs was confirmed by macrophage-specific genetic deletion of neuropilin (Nrp)-1, a binding partner of hypoxia-induced TAM attractant semaphorin 3A (Sema3A). The deletion of Nrp-1 impedes macrophage entry into hypoxic tumor compartments by blocking the Sema3A/Nrp1 signaling cascade, inhibiting angiogenesis and restoring antitumor activity (24). Hypoxia stimulates the production of VEGF and induces skin carcinogenesis through the recruitment and alternative activation of macrophages. Hypoxia-associated chemoattractant endothelial monocyte-activating polypeptide (EMAP) 2 also stimulates macrophage recruitment under hypoxic conditions (25). In hypoxic melanoma cells, HIF-1α induces the translocation and secretion of high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) that increases IL-10 production and M2-like TAM activation (26). HIF-1α increases forkhead box protein M1 expression and mediates hypoxia-inducible epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in prostate cancer (27). In addition, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, integrins, and immunoglobulins in the TME can promote the infiltration of monocytes and macrophages. For example, p110γ activated by tumor-derived chemoattractants, such as receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), TLR/IL1Rs or G protein-coupled receptors (GRCRs), selectively promotes the infiltration of myeloid cells into the TME (28). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) can degrade the ECM and regulate signaling pathways that control cell growth, inflammation and angiogenesis, and can even work in a non-proteolysis manner (29). Table I summarizes the cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, metabolites, integrins, immunoglobulins and selectins that are associated with M2-like TAMs recruitment in the TME.

Apart from the recruitment of macrophages mediated by signaling molecules, the interactions between TAMs and other cells, such as apoptotic and non-apoptotic tumor cells, adipocytes, endothelial cell (ECs) and fibroblasts, also recruit macrophages into the TME (Table I). Through the CCL2/IL-1β/CXCL12 signaling pathway, adipocytes recruit and activate macrophages to promote stromal vascularization and angiogenesis before the formation of a tumor (30). Adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (AFABP) secreted by TAMs and adipocytes facilitates pro-tumor IL-6/STAT3 signaling through the NFκB/microRNA (miR)-29b pathway in TAMs with the CD11b⁺F4/80⁺ major histocompatibility (MHC)II-lymphocyte antigen 6 complex phenotype (31). The number of TAMs settled in the vicinity of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is significantly correlated with cancer clinical stage. The interactions between TAMs and CAFs promote the recruitment and activation of each other, contributing to neuroblastoma progression (32). Similarly, increased CXCL1 levels in urothelial cancer enhances the recruitment of TAMs and CAFs, the metastasis of cancer cells, and predicts poor prognosis (33). TAMs produce IL-6 and signal via STAT3 to promote the expansion of human hepatocellular cancer stem cells (CSCs) (34). The secretion of CSC-derived chemoattractants, such as CCL2, CCL5 and VEGF-A, are much higher in glioma tissue than in normal tissue, which facilitates macrophage recruitment and may participate in the architecture of the glioma-initiating cell niche (35).

Macrophages are highly plastic and have dynamic phenotypes and functions. Depending on the induction signals, including hypoxia, malignant cell- or infiltrating T cell-derived cytokines, chemokines, metabolites and enzymes in the TME, macrophages are polarized into M1-like or M2-like TAMs that can be further categorized by Th1/Th2 lymphocyte polarization during inflammation (36). M1-like TAMs associated with Th1 are induced by interferon (IFN)-γ, CSF2, TNF-α, oxygen intermediates released by Th1 immune responses, and possess pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic antitumor abilities (Fig. 2) (37). Increased iNOS and pro-inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, IL-12 and IL-4, in M1-like TAMs are associated with a positive prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (38). Conversely, M2-like TAMs are induced by anti-inflammatory molecules, such as arginase 1 (ARG1), chitinase 3 like 1 (Ym1), interferon regulatory factor (IRF)4, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ or cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB), released by Th2 immune responses. This is accompanied by increased numbers of CD4⁺ T cells and a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer (39). TGF-β and IL10 produced by Th2 lymphocytes promote the Th2 response but inhibit Th1 activity, whilst IFN-γ and IL-4 produced by Th1 lymphocytes promote the Th1 response but inhibit Th2 activity (40) (Fig. 2). In addition, pro-inflammatory molecules, such as IFNγ, TLR4, IL12 and NOS that are secreted by the activation of the STAT1, IRF5, NF-κB or AP1 signaling pathways, promote the Th1 response and the polarization of M1-like TAMs (40). Β-Glucan (a dectin-1 ligand) was also found to promote M1 polarization via the NFκB/autophagy pathway (41). The reciprocal regulation between M1-like and M2-like TAMs are implemented by STAT1/STAT6, IRF5/IRF4, NF-κB/PPARγ, AP1/CREB, and AP1/PPARγ signaling axes (40), which are essential for the initiation, development, and cessation of tumor inflammation, and may be potential targets for modulating the transformation of M1-like and M2-like TAMs in clinical cancer immunotherapies (Fig. 2). However, the importance of these signaling axes in re-polarizing M2-like to M1-like TAMs remains to be assessed in TAMs-targeted cancer immunotherapy.

During the transformation of benign cells into invasive cancer cells, the TME is dominated by cytokines and growth factors resulting in the dominance of Th2-like immunosuppression, rather than a Th1-like pro-inflammatory environment (36). This shift results in M1-like TAMs polarizing into the M2-like TAMs, and the preferential accumulation of M2-like TAMs in the TME. These abundant cytokines and growth factors can be derived from tumor cells and non-tumor cells in the TME. For example, CD4⁺ T cell-derived Th2 cytokines, such as CSF1, IL-4, IL-13 and IL-10, promote the polarization of M1-like into M2-like TAMs in the TME (42) (Fig. 2). In addition, tumor cell-derived microparticles, lactate and miRs, such as miR-21-5p, miR-125 and miR-146, also promote M2-like TAMs polarization in the TME (43). The TME is dominantly populated by M2-like TAMs, but if M1-like TAMs activity is enhanced, the inhibition of local tumor growth is observed. The transformation of M2-like into M1-like TAMs under specific conditions can result in tumor recession. Therefore, altering the landscape of M1-like and M1-like TAMs in the TME may have value as a potential TAMs-targeted cancer immunotherapy (11). This alteration could be mediated by blocking macrophage infiltration, selectively killing M2-like TAMs, re-polarizing M2-like to M1-like TAMs or epigenetically silencing the secretion of M2-like TAM-induced molecules in the TME (44).

Macrophages are differentiated into either M1-like or M2-like TAMs, which ensures the intraclonal diversity necessary to maintain an efficient immune response in the TME. As key transcription factors for M1 differentiation, STAT1, IRF1 and IRF5 promote the activation of M1-like TAMs by activating the transcription of NO, IFN-γ, CXCL10 and MMP-12, and the specific receptors of M1-like TAMs, such as CD68, CD80/86 and CD11c (45) (Fig. 2). The transcription factors STAT3/6, Krueppel-like factor 2/4 and IRF3/4 promote the activation of M2-like TAMs and the ARG1-dependent arginine metabolism (45). Meanwhile, M2-like TAMs secret pro-tumor factors, such as VEGF, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2, CSF1, and express unique receptors, including scavenger and mannose receptors CD163, CD206 and CD204 (Fig. 2) (9). Antibodies used for TAMs identification include CD80/86, CD68, FcγRIII, CD14 and HLA-R for M1-like TAMs, and CD163, CD204, CD206 and Tim-3 for M2-like TAMs (Fig. 2) (46). M1-like TAMs with markers of F4/80⁺ CD11c⁺ mannose receptor C-type 1 (MRC1)^low can be separated from M2-like TAMs with markers of F4/80 ⁺ CD11c⁻ MRC1^high by flow cytometric analysis (47).

The proportion of M2-like TAMs is associated with the microvessel density of tumor tissue (12). Quantitative analysis of spatial associations has demonstrated the co-evolution of TAMs and tumor neovessels during cervical cancer invasion (48). The center of the tumor tissue is abundant with disorganized and immature blood vessels, and these central macrophages are associated with the remolding of blood vessels (49). Through secreting pro-angiogenic cytokines and growth factors, such as ornithine, TGF-β, VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and CSF1, M2-like TAMs provide nutrient factors for tumor angiogenesis (50). Several paracrine axes of M2-like TAMs are reported to trigger angiogenesis in the TME, including EGF/VEGFR2, ANG2/Tie2, CCL-18/ERK, Akt/glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β/Snail, CSF1/CSFR1 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1/NLR family pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3)/IL-1β signaling axes (Fig. 3). MMP-9 activity of bone marrow-derived CD45⁺ myeloid cells containing Tie2⁺-VEGFR1⁺-CD11b⁺-F4/80⁺ subpopulations is essential and sufficient to initiate angiogenesis by making sequestered VEGF bioavailable for interaction with its receptor VEGFR2 (51). Decreased levels of macrophage-derived VEGF inhibits angiogenesis in solid tumors by attenuating the formation of vessels (52). CCL-18 secreted by TAMs promotes angiogenesis in breast cancer by activating ERK and Akt/GSK-3β/Snail signaling and induces EMT in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (53). Excess blood and lymphatic vessel growth promote tumor progression, while insufficient growth causes tissue ischemia and lymphedema (54). Lymphatic and blood vascular ECs are regulated by two endothelial specific receptor tyrosine kinase systems: VEGF/VEGFR2 And ANG/Tie (54). HIF1α upregulates VEGF, Tie2 and ANG2 expression to promote angiogenesis (55). TAMs expressing Tie2 (ANG receptor) migrate towards ANG2 expressed by angiogenic vessel cells, which activates ECs and triggers angiogenesis by establishing an autocrine loop in vascular ECs (55). As shown in Fig. 3, activated ECs secrete ANG2 that interacts with the Tie2 receptor expressed by TAMs, mediating cell-to-cell interactions between ECs and TAMs and recruiting Tie-2-expressing cells to the vasculature (56). Decreased TAM counts mediated by inhibiting CSF1 leads to substantial attenuation in tumor angiogenesis. CSF1 upregulates Tie expression on TAMs. Conditional Tie2 gene knockdown in MRC1⁺ Tie2-expressing macrophages decreases tumor angiogenesis (Fig. 3) (56).

In contrast to M2-like TAM activity in angiogenesis, M1-like TAMs possess angiostatic properties by secreting IL-12, IL-18 and MMP-12 (Fig. 3). For example, the Th1 cell-induced secretion of IFN-γ, IL-12 and IL-18 stimulates the proliferation of M1-like TAMs and the production of angiostatic factors, such as CXCL10 (57). During tumor progression, PPAR-γ expression in tumor tissue can switch M1-like TAMs to M2-like TAMs (12). Selectively blocking PPAR-γ expression in tumor tissue may be a potential candidate for TAMs-targeted cancer immunotherapy.

Monitoring tumor metastasis using a multiphoton microscopy real-time imaging system indicated that a large number of TAMs are observed at the margin of tumor tissue, with decreasing numbers in the deeper tumor tissues collected from mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-polyomavirus middle T antigen (PyMT) and MMTV-PyMT/c-fms-GFP mice (49). The observations indicate a critical role of TAMs in the trafficking of tumor cells into non-tumor tissue, particularly as the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells are the major cause of cancer-associated mortality rather than primary tumor growth (58).

Several paracrine signaling axes between tumor cells and macrophages mediate the migration of both tumor cells and macrophages, including HMGB1/IL-10, EGF/EGFR, CSF1/CSF1R, TGF-G/SOX9, CCL4/myosin 3A and TLR4/IL-10 (Fig. 3). Tumor hypoxia increases HMGB1 expression in metastatic melanoma, which promotes IL-10 production in M2-like TAMs through the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (26). The paracrine loop between tumor-synthesized CSF1 and macrophage-produced EGF mediates the migration and invasion of tumor cells together with macrophages along collagen fibers, acting as physical pathways towards blood vessels. Inhibition of either CSF1- or EGF-stimulated signaling reduces the migration of both tumor cells and macrophages originating in primary tumor tissues collected from WAP-Cre/CAG-CAT-EGFP/MMTV-PyMT mice (59) (Fig. 3). IL-4-induced Cathepsin protease activity in TAMs promotes pancreatic tumor growth and cell invasion in vitro and in vivo (60). IL-4-expressing CD4⁺ T lymphocytes indirectly promote invasion and subsequent metastasis of mammary adenocarcinomas by directly regulating the phenotype and effector function of CD11b⁺Gr1⁻F4/80⁺ TAMs, in turn enhancing metastasis through activating EGFR signaling in malignant mammary epithelial cells (61). In addition, Heregulin B1 and CXCL12 function as tumor metastasis mediators by controlling the EGF/CSF1 paracrine invasion loop (62). Large quantities of Versican produced by Lewis lung cancer cells promote the proliferation of metastatic tumor cells by activating macrophages through the TLR2/TLR6 axis (63). The STAT3/6 signaling pathways synergistically increase Cathepsin secretion from M2-like TAMs, which promote macrophage-mediated pancreatic cancer cell invasion in a Cathepsin-dependent manner (64). In a triple-negative breast cancer mouse model, local and systemic levels of TAM-induced MMP-9, VEGF, Ym1 and Lipocalin-2 mediate metastasis in breast cancer. M2-like TAMs secrete proteases, such as MMPs and serine protease, to disrupt cell-cell junctions, the basal membrane and the organization of vascular ECs into blood vessels, which allows tumor cells to pass through the ECM and facilitate the migration and invasion of tumor cells in numerous types of tumor, including breast and lung cancer (65) (Fig. 3). Hyaluronic acid (HA), a major component of the ECM, is specifically recognized by macrophages expressing the HA receptor CD44 (66). HA-CD44 interactions serve important roles in monocyte adhesion and recruitment, as well as macrophage recruitment to support tumor growth and metastasis (66).

CXCL1 secreted by M2-like TAMs promotes breast cancer invasion and EMT by activating NF-κB/SOX4 signaling (67). In fact, there are several CCLR axes that can enhance the migration of cancer cells by blocking androgen/AR signaling. For example, the CCL5/CCR5 axis inhibits androgen/AR signaling as an upstream mediator in prostate cancer cells (68). While the CCL2/CCR2 axis is negatively regulated by androgen/AR signaling, with the CCL22/CCR4 axis acting as a further downstream mediator, both axes promote prostate cancer cell migration (68). CCL4 promotes prostate carcinogenesis through macrophage androgen/AR signaling. The CCL21/CCR7 axis is activated by TNF-α and induces lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer (68). VEGF-A also stimulate TAMs to produce CXCL1, and elevated CXCL1 in premetastatic liver tissue promotes the recruitment of CXCR2-positive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) to form a premetastatic niche, which ultimately promotes liver metastases (69). Tumor-derived CSF2 induced Bv8 expression in myeloid cells to enhance myelopoiesis and mobilization of MDSCs from the bone marrow (70). The aforementioned data demonstrate that TAMs functions in the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells are complex. A schematic model representing the sensors, effector molecules and the corresponding functions of the M2-like TAMs are illustrated in Fig. 4. Some of these molecules have been defined as M2 markers (such as CD206 and CD163), while others have not (such as CD209), but they all function in the activation of M2-like TAMs (Fig. 4) (71).

With high phagocytic capacity, macrophages are the first line of innate immune defense against abnormal cell damage in tissues. By mediating and providing the required costimulatory signaling and cytokine secretion, and identifying and presenting foreign antigens on MHC I and II molecules to T cells, macrophages also serve a central role in T-cell effective activation of the adaptive immune response (72). M1-like TAMs secrete Th1-inducing NO that can directly kill cancer cells in non-specific manner. In turn, activated Th1 responses further promote the activation of M1-like TAMs, CD8⁺ T cells, IgG B cells and IFN-γ-producing CD4⁺ T cells (73). By releasing pro-inflammatory molecules, such as TNF-α, IFNγ and ROS/RNS, activating TLRs and decreasing the expression of anti-inflammatory factors, such as ARG1, TGFβ and IL10, M1-like TAMs promote the inflammatory response and anti-tumor activity in the TME (Fig. 5). These pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by M1-like TAMs trigger the tumoricidal actions of natural killer (NK) cells, stimulate cytotoxic type Th1 and tumor-specific cytotoxic T cell responses, and induce the activity of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 5) (73). M1-like TAMs, but not M2-like TAMs, are able to release pro-inflammatory IL-12 that is required in response to the antitumor activities mediated by NK, Th1 and CTL cells (74).

Several chemoattractant, cytokines and enzymes derived from M2-like TAMs can stimulate the activation of induced regulatory T cells (iTregs) and recruit natural Tregs (nTregs), which exert immunosuppressive effects by directly inhibiting the function of effector T cells or secreting immunosuppressive factors, such as CCL5 and CCL20 (Fig. 5). For example, M2-like TAM-derived IL-10, TGF-β, PGE2 and prostanoids inhibit the cytotoxic function of effector T and NK cells, promote the development of Tregs and activate iTregs and ineffective APCs by upregulating Foxp3 in CD4⁺ T cells (75). In addition, CCL5, CCL20 and CCL22 released by M2-like TAMs recruit and activate iTregs to suppress the function of effector T cells, resulting in immune suppression in the TME (Fig. 5). M2-like TAMs secrete CCL22 in human ovarian cancer, mediating Treg trafficking to tumor tissue through the CCL22/CCR4 axis (76). M2-like TAMs secreted CCL20, which recruits CCR6⁺ nTregs to promote immunosuppression in the TME (55). M2-like TAMs suppress T cell proliferation in part by expressing ARG1 that catabolizes arginine necessary for T cell activation and proliferation; decreased arginine levels results in impaired effector T cell function in the TME (77). Small extracellular vesicles containing ARG1 suppress CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo in mouse models of ovarian carcinomas (78). Tumor cells use extracellular vesicles to transport the metabolic checkpoint molecule ARG1 over long distances to immune cells to weaken antitumor immune responses (78).

PI3Kγ functions downstream of several chemoattractant receptors, such as RTKs (including VEGF-R1 and CSF1R) and GPCR (including CCR2 and CXCR4) (Fig. 5). The inhibition of PI3Kγ activates the NF-κB pathway, increases the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, IL-12, NOS2 and MHCII on APCs (including macrophages and DCs), and inhibits the expression of immunosuppressive factors, such as IL-10, TGFβ, ARG1 and CCL2 (79). Chemoattractants such as SDF-1a, VEGFa and IL-1b activate RTKs, GPCRs and TLR/ILR signaling molecules that initiate tumor inflammation by activating the PI3K isoform p110γ in Gr1⁺CD11b⁺ myeloid cells (28). M2-like TAMs produce anti-inflammatory immunosuppression and pro-tumor activity by releasing growth-promoting molecules like ornithine, which promotes Th2-type cytotoxic responses, increases the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and IL-10, decreases levels of pro-inflammatory factors, including IL12, IFNγ and iNOS, and induces ineffective antigen presentation (Fig. 5) (79).

The predominate presence of M2-like TAMs in the TME is partially responsible for tumor immune evasion and chemoresistance, and the potential of TAM-targeted tumor immunotherapies has received considerable interest. The current strategies being explored for such cancer treatment include (Table II): i) blocking the infiltration of macrophages into the TME (15); ii) depleting/killing dominating M2-like TAMs in the TME; iii) reprogramming M2-like TAMs into the M1-like phenotype in the TME (80); and iv) TAM-mediated delivery of therapeutics (81).

Blocking the signaling axes of chemoattractants and their receptors (such as CCL2/CCR2⁺, CCL2/CCR5⁺, IL-1β/IL-1R, VEGFA/VEGFR, CSF1/CSFR and Tie/ANG2) may be potential candidates for targeting macrophage-recruitment therapy. For example, clinical trials with several CCR-2 inhibitors, such as PF-04136309 and MLN1202, are currently ongoing for the treatment of solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and colorectal cancer (79) (Table III). Combination of therapy blocking CCL-2 or CCR-2 signaling with chemo-, radio- or immunotherapy improves antitumor effects by decreasing the infiltration of myeloid cells in preclinical mouse models (82). In addition to therapy blocking macrophage recruitment, selective elimination of the dominating M2-like TAMs in the TME can inhibit tumor growth and restore local immune surveillance. For example, a hybrid peptide of MEL-dKLA selectively triggered M2-like TAM apoptosis without affecting other leukocytes, such as T cells and DCs, and increased the M1/M2 ratio, which reduced tumor growth rates, tumor weights and angiogenesis in a lung cancer mouse model (83) (Table III).

Different studies have shown that genetic or epigenetic reprogramming of M2-like TAMs into M1-like TAMs in the TME has promising effects. Specific STAT3 inhibition in human monocytes and macrophages by CD163-targeted corosolic acid-containing liposomes promotes M1-like TAMs reprogramming, inhibits STAT3-regulated IL-10 expression and increases pro-inflammatory TNFα levels (84). Paclitaxel alters the signature of TAMs in the TME from a M2-like pro-tumor profile (CD206, RELMα, MMP9 and ARG1) to a M1-like antitumor profile (IL12, iNOS and IL6), inducing tumor regression by reprogramming in a TLR4-dependent manner in mouse models of breast and melanoma tumors (85) (Table III). RP6530 re-polarizes M2-like TAMs into M1-like TAMs to inhibit the growth of tumor vasculature, leading to tumor regression via the PI3Kδ/γ-dependent pathway (86). Oral administration of baicalin mediates the re-polarization of M2-like into M1-like TAMs in the TME and the inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma in an orthotopic mouse model by autophagy-induced RelB/p52 activation (87). The combination of PMX-53 (a C5aR1 peptide antagonist) and paclitaxel synergistically inhibits tumor growth by re-polarizing M2-like towards the M1-like TAM phenotype, inhibiting angiogenesis and recruiting cytotoxic T lymphocytes (88). TMP195 re-polarizes M2-like into M1-like TAMs and synergizes with PD-1 antibody to reduce tumor burden and metastasis in an autochthonous mouse model of breast cancer (89). In addition, macrophages have great potential in cancer drug delivery because they can sense chemotactic cues and migrate to tumors with high efficiency (90). For example, liposomal-doxorubicin delivered by macrophages exhibited higher therapeutic efficacy than doxorubicin delivered by liposome or doxorubicin alone in both subcutaneous and metastasis xenograft lung tumor models (91) (Tables II and III). Therapy with Dox-laden nanocapsules leads to efficient tumor growth suppression, while causing little systemic toxicity in U87MG tumor bearing nude mice (90).

As summarized in the present review, the preferential accumulation of M2-like TAMs is a major contributor to the establishment of metastatic and malignant tumors. TAM-targeted cancer immunotherapies are now being explored and developed, including: i) Blocking macrophage recruitment; ii) M2-like TAM-targeted depletion in the TEM; iii) M2-like TAM-targeted reprogramming therapy in the TEM; and iv) macrophage-mediated drug delivery systems. However, there are a number of unsolved challenges, such as rapid clearance from the blood circulation, inefficient targeting and cytotoxicity issues, that will limit the application of TAM-targeted therapy in the clinic. Additionally, increasing M1-like TAMs through the re-polarization of M2-like TAMs into M1-like TAMs may induce the infiltration of T lymphocytes into tumors and increase their ability to kill tumor cells, while overzealous M1-like TAMs contributing to chronic inflammation may lead to atherosclerosis and other chronic inflammatory conditions (11). New technologies, such as single cell sequencing, and digitalization and visual spatial analysis models, may help to resolve some of these problems.