BR Biomedical Reports 2049-9434 2049-9442 D.A. Spandidos BR-0-0-01388 10.3892/br.2020.1388 Articles Short-term efficacy after switching from adefovir dipivoxil and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy to tenofovir alaferamide for chronic hepatitis B SanoTomoya 1 AmanoKeisuke 1 IdeTatsuya 1 KawaguchiToshihiro 1 KuwaharaReiichiro 1 Arinaga-HinoTeruko 1 KogaHironori 1 2 KuromatsuRyoko 1 TorimuraTakuji 1 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan Division of Liver Cancer Research, Research Center for Innovative Cancer Therapy, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan Correspondence to: Dr Tomoya Sano, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan sano_tomoya@med.kurume-u.ac.jp

Abbreviations: ADV, adefovir dipivoxil; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ETV, entecavir; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LAM, lamivudine; NAs, nucleos(t)ide analogs; HBeAb, hepatitis B e antibody; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, serum hepatitis B surface antigen; TFV, tenofovir; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Tmp/GFR, tubular maximum for phosphate corrected for the GFR; TRP, tubular reabsorption of phosphate

 01 2021 12 11 2020 14 1 12 20 07 2020 29 10 2020 Copyright: © Sano et al. 2020 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in patients who had received a nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The data from 33 Japanese patients with CHB who received TAF therapy after using NA [adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)] were retrospectively analyzed. Specifically, the biochemical and virological markers from the start of the TAF treatment to 6 months later were assessed. Comparative evaluation was performed by dividing patients into two groups: Long-term (n=19) and short-term administration groups (n=14), with a cutoff administration duration of 10 years. In all 33 patients, the levels of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg; 1,126±1,724 to 1,001±1,591 IU/ml; P<0.0001), serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (320±126 to 283±124 U/l; P=0.028), serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (19.7±9.0 to 17.7±8.0 µg/l; P=0.0006) and urine β2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio (U-BMG/Cr; 5,224±17,471 to 3,547±14,652 µg/g·Cre; P=0.002) significantly decreased from baseline after 6 months. Serum HBsAg, serum ALP and U-BMG/Cr showed a significant reduction in both groups. In conclusion, switching from ADV or TDF to TAF resulted in a decrease in serum HBsAg and improvement in serum ALP and U-BMG/Cr after 6 months of treatment in patients regardless of history of treatment with NA.

 adefovir dipivoxil hepatitis B virus tenofovir alafenamide tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common chronic viral infection worldwide, infecting ~2 billion individuals, of which >350 million are chronic HBV carriers (1). The development of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) has revolutionized the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in the last two decades (2). At present, five NAs have been approved as antiviral therapies for CHB in Japan. These agents are classified according to their chemical structures: Two nucleoside analogs that include lamivudine (LAM) and entecavir (ETV), two nucleotide analogs that include adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (3), and the newly approved tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (4-6). NAs are known to effectively suppress HBV replication and reduce the risk of disease progression and hepatic events (7). Long-term NA treatment has demonstrated effectiveness in improving histological findings and reducing the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (8,9). Although NAs are generally safe and comparatively free of major side effects (10), renal and bone toxicity may occur in a small yet significant proportion of patients receiving older generation NAs, for example, ADV and TDF (11). Given the high number of patients receiving NAs worldwide, even a small risk of any of these toxicities can be translated into a major medical issue. TAF was approved in Japan for HBV treatment in 2017(12). Both TAF and TDF are phosphonamidite prodrugs of tenofovir (TFV) that share the same intracellular active metabolite, TFV diphosphate, which is effective against both HBV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection (13,14). TAF has greater plasma stability, which allows for more efficient uptake by hepatocytes at lower plasma concentrations than TDF; thus, the circulating concentration of TFV is 90% lower after administration of a 25 mg dose of TAF than after a 300 mg dose of TDF (15). This difference likely contributes to the relatively better safety profile of TAF compared with TDF, particularly for renal and bone dysfunction. TAF was shown to have less influence on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal tubule function than TDF in international phase III trials (4-6). Long-term use of ADV and TDF has been reported, and there are several cases where renal and tubular dysfunction and bone metabolism abnormalities occurred (16-19). At present, few studies have reported the effect of switching to TAF after long-term use of other NAs (particularly the nucleotide group). Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of TAF (particularly on renal and tubular function) in patients with CHB who had received NA treatment.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>Patients

The present retrospective, single-center study included patients with chronic HBV infection. A total of 33 consecutive adult Japanese patients (mean age 61.5±8.7 years; 23 males and 10 females) who received TAF-based monotherapy (Vemlidy; Gilead Sciences KK) or a combination rescue therapy (including LAM and ETV combined) after using ADV and/or TDF between May 2017 and March 2019 at Kurume University Hospital were recruited. The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Co-infection with HIV-1 or hepatitis C virus; ii) other liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease or metabolic liver disease; iii) decompensated cirrhosis; and iv) terminal illness.

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki (20) and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Kurume University Hospital (approval no. 17209). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Standard doses of LAM (100 mg/day), ADV (10 mg/day), ETV (0.5 mg/day), TDF (300 mg/day) and TAF (25 mg/day) were administered. The dosing interval of ADV and TDF was modified by the attending physician (once every 2 days) when the estimated GFR (eGFR) decreased to 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 or lower.

 Study design

Biochemical (particularly renal tubular function and phosphorus metabolism) and virological markers were assessed at the start of TAF administration and 3 and 6 months after switching in all 33 cases. The patients were divided into two groups: Long-term NA administration (n=19) and short-term NA administration (n=14).

In Japan, NA compounds received insurance approvals at different times: LAM in 2000, ADV in 2004, ETV in 2006(21), TDF in 2014, and TAF in 2017. Reflecting on the above grouping, all patients who received NA treatment for ≥10 years were introduced with LAM and were included in the long-term group. Conversely, all patients who received NA therapy for <10 years were treated with an NA other than LAM and were included in the short-term group. Changes in biological and virological markers were compared between the two groups.

 Data collection

All available medical records were evaluated thoroughly. Body mass index was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m). Hypertension was defined as a clinical systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or clinical diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or the use of antihypertensive agents. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed if the fasting blood glucose levels were >126 mg/dl or the HbA1c levels were >6.9%, according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus (22) or by the documented use of antidiabetic agents or insulin. Blood and urine samples were collected in the morning after an overnight fast. The renal function was assessed by calculating the eGFR using the chronic kidney disease (CKD) epidemiology collaboration formula (23). The renal tubular function was assessed using a urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase-creatinine ratio and urine β2-microglobulin-creatinine (U-BMG/Cr) ratio. The tubular metabolism of phosphates was assessed using a tubular maximum for phosphate corrected for the GFR (TmP/GFR) and tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP). TRP was calculated using the following formula: TRP=(1-urine phosphate/urine creatinine)x(serum creatinine/serum phosphate). The formula used to calculate TmP/GFR is dependent on the value of TRP and can be calculated using the following formulas: If TRP is ≤0.86, then TmP/GFR=TRP x serum phosphate; if TRP is >0.86, then TmP/GFR=0.3x TRP/(1-0.8x TRP)x serum phosphate (24).

 Serum viral markers

The serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels were determined using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (LUMIPULSE G1200 HBsAg-HQ assay kit; Fujirebio Inc.); the lower limit of detection was 0.005 IU/ml. The serum HBV DNA levels were determined using real-time TaqMan PCR assay (Cobas Taqman HBV test, Auto v2.0 kit, Roche Diagnostics, K.K); the lower limit of detection was 2.1 logcopies/ml. The serum hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb) levels were determined using a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (Architect HBeAg; HBeAb assay kit; Abbott Laboratory; cat. no. 6C32).

 Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or as percentages. Differences between groups were compared using a χ2 test or a Mann-Whitney U test, where appropriate. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro version 13 (SAS Institute). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

 Results <sec> <title>Baseline characteristics

Table I lists the baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics at the start of TAF therapy. In addition, Table SI lists the treatment history with NAs in all cases. The mean age of all patients was 61.5±8.7 years, and the majority of patients were male (70%). Moreover, 9 (27%) patients had arterial hypertension and 5 (15%) had diabetes mellitus. The mean duration of NA treatment was 11.2±6.3 years. A total of 21 patients (64%) had a history of ADV and 24 (73%) had a history of TDF treatment. The mean total duration of ADV treatment was 9.8±3.0 years, and the mean total duration of TDF treatment was 2.0±0.8 years. A total of 32 (97%) patients had chronic hepatitis and ADV had been administered for ~10 years. In addition, the backgrounds of the long-term and short-term administration groups were compared. A significant difference was observed between the administration periods of total NA (16.1±2.4 vs. 4.6±2.7 years; P<0.001) and ADV (10.5±2.1 vs. 3.3±0.4; P=0.027). Similarly, the rates of NA treatment history were different. Most patients with a history of LAM and ADV treatment were included in the long-term group. Other significant differences were found in the rates of hypertension (9 vs. 2; P<0.191) complications and HBeAg-positive (3 vs. 8; P=0.0240). Conversely, no significant differences were found in the other baseline characteristics amongst the two groups.

 Time course observation of virological markers and hepatobiliary enzymes

Table II shows the time course of virological markers and hepatobiliary enzymes in all 33 cases after 3 and 6 months after switching to TAF. Regarding virological markers, HBsAg significantly decreased after 6 months (1,126±1,724 to 1,001±1,591 IU/ml; P<0.0001). As for hepatobiliary enzymes, the serum ALP levels significantly improved (320±126 to 283±124 U/l; P=0.028). In addition, the serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) level, an ALP isozyme derived from bone (25,26), also improved after 6 months (19.7±9.0 to 17.7±8.0 µg/l; P=0.0006). Other virological markers and hepatobiliary enzymes did not show any significant changes.

 Time course of observation of renal and tubular function and phosphorus metabolism

Table III shows the time course of renal and tubular functions and phosphorus metabolism in all 33 cases. U-BMG/Cr, which is associated with tubular function, was significantly improved after 6 months (5,224±17,471 to 3,547±14,652 µg/g x Cre; P=0.002). Regarding other renal and tubular functions, no significant changes in phosphorus metabolism were noted, and no problematic adverse reactions were observed after switching treatment regimens.

 Comparison based on the duration of NA administration

Changes in viral markers, hepatobiliary enzymes, renal and tubular functions, and phosphorus metabolism between the long-term and short-term administration groups were compared and assessed. The results of each group are shown in Tables II and III. In the long-term group, the serum HBsAg levels were 590±641 and 537±598 IU/ml before switching to TAF and 6 months after switching, respectively (P=0.0108), and those of the short-term group were 1,853±2,400 and 1,631±2,235 IU/ml, respectively (P=0.0040). In the long-term group, the serum ALP levels were 324±141 and 302±151 U/l before switching and 6 months after switching, respectively (P=0.0281), and those of the short-term group were 298±86 and 257±69 U/l, respectively (P=0.0050). In the long-term group, the serum BAP levels were 21.1±11.0 and 19.2±9.7 µg/l before switching and 6 months after, respectively (P=0.0678), whereas in the short-term group, the values were 17.9±5.1 and 15.5±4.6 µg/l, respectively (P=0.0016). In the long-term group, the U-BMG/Cr ratios before switching and 6 months after switching were 8,635±23,026 and 5,815±19,200 µg/g·Cre, respectively (P=0.0017), whereas in the short-term group they were 951±1,455 and 469±549 µg/g·Cre, respectively (P=0.0052).

Fig. 1 shows the reduction in the HBsAg levels and the improvements in serum ALP, serum BAP and U-BMG/Cr levels in each group. The HBsAg levels decreased by 0.88±1.37 log-IU/ml in the long-term group and by 1.55±1.49 log-IU/ml in the short-term group, whereas the serum ALP levels improved by 8.1±11.9% in the long-term group and 12.2±12.8% in the short-term group. The serum BAP levels improved by 6.5±17.1% in the long-term group and 12.2±12.0% in the short-term group. U-BMG/Cr improved by 40.6±42.9% in the long-term group and by 32.1±34.3% in the short-term group. In summary, similar to the results seen in all 33 cases, a significant decrease in serum HBsAg levels and a significant improvement in serum ALP and U-BMG/Cr levels were observed in both groups. The serum BAP improved in both groups, but a significant improvement was observed only in the short-term group. HBsAg was significantly reduced in the short-term group compared with the long-term group (P=0.0432). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the other comparisons.

 Discussion

The present study evaluated changes in biochemical (particularly renal and tubular functions and phosphorus metabolism) and virological markers in patients with CHB who switched from treatment with ADV or TDF therapy to TAF therapy. The results from the whole sample showed that the serum HBsAg and ALP levels and the U-BMG/Cr ratio were significantly decreased 6 months after switching. Within this period, no cases were found to have inadequate disease control due to a decrease in the antiviral effect and exacerbation of hepatobiliary enzymes.

Regarding the reduction in the HBsAg levels, Hagiwara et al (27) reported that it was particularly prominent in patients with serum HBsAg levels <800 IU/ml after switching from ETV to TAF. Uchida et al (28) found that the degree of reduction in serum HBsAg levels after switching from ETV to TAF was significantly higher, particularly in patients with cirrhosis, genotype B HBV infection and serum hepatitis B core related antigen levels <3.0 log U/ml. As mentioned above, some studies reported on factors contributing to the reduction in the serum HBsAg levels after switching from other NAs to TAF. In patients with low levels of HBV DNA who had a low risk of HCC, serum HBsAg levels were identified as an independent risk factor for the development of HCC (29). In addition, patients who received TDF treatment exhibit a reduced risk of developing HCC compared with those who received ETV treatment (30,31).

A possible mechanism underlying the difference in HCC risk is the induction of IFN-λ activity in patients treated with NAs, such as TDF and TAF, which would lead to the inhibition of HBsAg production and activation of an antitumor effect (32). As mentioned above, since the inhibitory effect of TFV on HCC development has been reported, it is necessary to examine not only the effect of reducing serum HBsAg levels in TAF but also the effect of reducing HCC risk in the future, but this was not evaluated in the present study. Moreover, renal and tubular functions were considered. Mitochondrial dysfunction of the proximal tubule cells is presumed to be a mechanism of renal dysfunction and the onset of ADV-related Fanconi syndrome (33). Fanconi syndrome is a disease that causes disorders of glucose, amino acid, phosphorus, and bicarbonate reabsorption in the proximal tubule of the kidney, and is often associated with osteomalacia (34). Renal tubular injury is characterized by a decrease in serum phosphorus and uric acid levels, an increase in U-BMG, and osteomalacia combined with elevation of the serum ALP levels (34,35). Previously, genetic polymorphisms of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, which is involved in the excretion of ADV from the renal tubule, have been reported as factors contributing to renal impairment by ADV (36,37). Although ADV was changed to TDF in ADV-related Fanconi syndrome, TDF is structurally similar to ADV, and renal dysfunction and Fanconi syndrome due to TDF have also been reported. Therefore, as in ADV treatment, monitoring of renal and tubular functions is also required (17,18,38).

As an important clinical premise, tubular dysfunction may precede the decline in glomerular function. Tubular proteinuria implies the presence of increased amounts of small-sized proteins in the urine that are freely filtered in the glomerulus but reabsorbed by the proximal tubules (39,40). β2-microglobulinuria is prevalent amongst TFV-treated patients, even with normal GFR (39,40). In the present study, the mean overall eGFR was 73.4±13.7 ml/min/1.73 m2; although various patients had normal kidney function or mild CKD, the mean U-BMG/Cr was elevated (>300 µg/g·Cre was defined as abnormal) (41), indicating that tubular damage was already present. Primary tubular abnormalities, even severe, may be missed until they affect the glomerular function; thus, specific and early screening is necessary to prevent abnormalities.

Blood biochemical examination alone is insufficient to assess tubular dysfunction, and a regular urine test is recommended in patients undergoing NA treatment. This is also useful for evaluating phosphorous metabolism. Thus, how the duration of NA administration affected the transition of biochemical data was assessed with a focus on renal and tubular function after switching to TAF between the long-term and short-term groups. The U-BMG/Cr findings indicate that tubular injury was already present even in the short-term group. Similar to the whole-sample results, switching to TAF showed a significant improvement in serum ALP levels and in the U-BMG/Cr ratio in both groups. As shown in Fig. 1, an improvement in serum ALP levels and in the U-BMG/Cr ratio can be expected after this switch.

The important points of the present study were that these improvements were obtained regardless of the duration of the previous NA administration and that the effect was observed within 6 months after switching therapy. The incidence of tubular dysfunction has been reported to increase dramatically 8 years after the start of ADV administration (42). Thus, it is notable that the tubular dysfunction caused by long-term administration of NA, including ADV, is improved by switching to TAF. A real-world study also reported that switching from TDF to TAF significantly reduced tubular dysfunction markers, including the U-BMG/Cr and retinol-binding protein-creatinine ratio in 3 months (43). A previous study also reported that not only tubular dysfunction markers, but also eGFR, significantly improved 1 and 6 months after switching from TDF to TAF (44).

Most patients treated with NA combination therapy have already been treated for years or even decades. Furthermore, since complete eradication of HBV is exceedingly difficult with current treatments, continuous treatment is required. Based on previous reports and the present study, which found an improvement in a short period of time, switching to TAF in patients with renal and tubular dysfunction appears to be effective regardless of previous NA administration duration (43,44). Therefore, switching to TAF should be considered, even in patients treated with NAs who have not experienced side effects. Although a detailed examination was not performed in the present study, including analysis of changes in bone density, the improvement in serum ALP and BAP levels may reflect an improvement in bone metabolism. In fact, clinical trials and real-world studies have shown superior bone safety in patients treated with TAF compared with those treated with TDF (4-6,43).

The limitations of the present study are the small sample size, the short-term follow-up period, and the lack of a control group. The effects on serum HBsAg level reduction, renal tubular function and bone metabolism by switching from NA to TAF should be investigated in a larger cohort over a period of time. Considering the association between renal and bone dysfunction, long-term administration of ADV and TDF, and the increase in compliance due to the convenience of administration timing compared with ETV (45), if the antiviral effect is not inferior in the long term and is safer, it is expected that switching to TAF therapy will become more frequently recommended in the future. Further randomized clinical trials are required for selecting appropriate NAs.

In conclusion, switching from ADV or TDF to TAF confirmed a decrease in serum HBsAg and improvement in serum ALP levels and the U-BMG/Cr ratio after 6 months in patients regardless of length of NA administration history.

 Supplementary Material Treatment history with NAs in all cases. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr T. Kawaguchi, Dr T. Nakamura, Dr M. Nakano, Dr S. Okamura, Dr M. Abe and Dr S. Shimose, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine for their contribution to this study.

 Funding

No funding was received.

 Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 Authors' contributions

TS, KA, TI, TK, RK, TAH, HK, RK and TT obtained the biological samples. TS, KA, and TI analyzed the data. TS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Kurume University Hospital (approval no. 17209). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

 Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

 Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 References TrépoCChanHLYLokAHepatitis B virus infectionLancet3842053206320142495467510.1016/S0140-6736(14)60220-8 KwonHLokASHepatitis B therapyNat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol827528420112142326010.1038/nrgastro.2011.33 LoAOWongGLCurrent developments in nucleoside/nucleotide analogues for hepatitis BExpert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol860762220142478767310.1586/17474124.2014.909724 ButiMGaneESetoWKChanHLChuangWLStepanovaTHuiAJLimYSMehtaRJanssenHLTenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A randomised, double- blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trialLancet Gastroenterol Hepatol119620620162840409210.1016/S2468-1253(16)30107-8 ChanHLFungSSetoWKChuangWLChenCYKimHJHuiAJJanssenHLChowdhuryATsangTYTenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trialLancet Gastroenterol Hepatol118519520162840409110.1016/S2468-1253(16)30024-3 AgarwalKBrunettoMSetoWKLimYSFungSMarcellinPAhnSHIzumiNChuangWLBaeH96 weeks treatment of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B virus infectionJ Hepatol6867268120182975659510.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.039 WongGLChanHLMakCWLeeSKIpZMLamATIuHWLeungJMLaiJWLoAOEntecavir treatment reduces hepatic events and deaths in chronic hepatitis B patients with liver cirrhosisHepatology581537154720132338981010.1002/hep.26301 GordonSCLameratoLERuppLBLiJHolmbergSDMoormanACSpradlingPRTeshaleEHVijayadevaVBoscarinoJAAntiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection and development of hepatocellular carcinoma in a US populationClin Gastroenterol Hepatol1288589320142410739510.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.062 LokASMcMahonBJBrownRS JrWongJBAhmedATFarahWAlmasriJAlahdabFBenkhadraKMouchliMAAntiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B viral infection in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysisHepatology6328430620162656624610.1002/hep.28280 MakLYSetoWKLaiCLYuenMFDNA polymerase inhibitors for treating hepatitis B: A safety evaluationExpert Opin Drug Saf1538339220162675268710.1517/14740338.2016.1139573 WongGLTseYKWongVWYipTCTsoiKKChanHLLong-term safety of oral nucleos(t)ide analogs for patients with chronic hepatitis B: A cohort study of 53,500 subjectsHepatology6268469320152597397910.1002/hep.27894 CathcartALChanHLBhardwajNLiuYMarcellinPPanCQShalimar ButiMCoxSParhyBNo resistance to tenofovir alafenamide detected through 96 Weeks of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B infectionAntimicrob Agents Chemother62e010641820183003804410.1128/AAC.01064-18 SaxPEWohlDYinMTPostFDeJesusESaagMPozniakAThompsonMPodzamczerDMolinaJMTenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: Two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trialsLancet3852606261520152589067310.1016/S0140-6736(15)60616-X MillsAArribasJRAndrade-VillanuevaJDiPerriGVan LunzenJKoenigEElionRCavassiniMMadrugaJVBrunettaJSwitching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in antiretroviral regimens for virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection: A randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, open-label, Phase 3, non-inferiority studyLancet Infect Dis16435220162653852510.1016/S1473-3099(15)00348-5 AgarwalKFungSKNguyenTTChengWSicardERyderSDFlahertyJFLawsonEZhaoSSubramanianGMTwenty-eight days safety, antiviral activity, and pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infectionJ Hepatol6253354020152545071710.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.035 HaNBHaNBGarciaRTTrinhHNVuAANguyenHANguyenKKLevittBSNguyenMHRenal dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with adefovir dipivoxilHepatology5072773420091951752510.1002/hep.23044 JungYKYeonJEChoiJHKimCHJungESKimJHParkJJKimJSBakYTByunKSFanconi's Syndrome associated with prolonged adefovir dipivoxil therapy in a hepatitis B virus patientGut Liver438939320102098121910.5009/gnl.2010.4.3.389 ViganòMBrocchieriASpinettiAZaltronSMangiaGFacchettiFFugazzaACastelliFColomboMLamperticoPTenofovir-induced Fanconi syndrome in chronic hepatitis B monoinfected patients that reverted after tenofovir withdrawalJ Clin Virol6160060320142545357310.1016/j.jcv.2014.09.016 MaussSBergerFFilmannNHueppeDHenkeJHegenerPAthmannCSchmutzGHerrmannEEffect of HBV polymerase inhibitors on renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis BJ Hepatol551235124020112170318010.1016/j.jhep.2011.03.030 World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiEthical principles for medical research involving human subjectsJAMA3102191219420132414171410.1001/jama.2013.281053 Drafting Committee for Hepatitis Management Guidelines and the Japan Society of HepatologyJSH Guidelines for the management of hepatitis B virus infectionHepatol Res44 (Suppl S1)S1S5820142439783910.1111/hepr.12269 Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes MellitusSeinoYNanjoKTajimaNKadowakiTKashiwagiAArakiEItoCInagakiNIwamotoYReport of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitusJ Diabetes Investig121222820101175548110.1016/s0168-8227(01)00365-5 LeveyASStevensLASchmidCHZhangYCastroAF IIIFeldmanHIKusekJWEggersPVan LenteFGreeneTA new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rateAnn Intern Med15060461220091941483910.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 BarthJHJonesRGPayneRBCalculation of renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate: The algorithm performs better than the nomogramAnn Clin Biochem37798120001067237810.1258/0004563001901371 BervoetsARSpasovskiGBBehetsGJDamsGPolenakovicMHZafirovskaKVan HoofVODe BroeMED'HaesePCUseful biochemical markers for diagnosing renal osteodystrophy in predialysis end-stage renal failure patientsAm J Kidney Dis41997100720031272203410.1016/s0272-6386(03)00197-5 UreñaPHrubyMFerreiraAAngKSde VernejoulMCPlasma total versus bone alkaline phosphatase as markers of bone turnover in hemodialysis patientsJ Am Soc Nephrol750651219968704118 HagiwaraSNishidaNIdaHUeshimaKMinamiYTakitaMKomedaYKudoMSwitching from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus maintaining entecavir for chronic hepatitis BJ Med Virol911804181020193119951310.1002/jmv.25515 UchidaYNakaoMTsujiSUemuraHKouyamaJINaikiKMotoyaDSugawaraKNakayamaNImaiYSignificance of switching of the nucleos(t)ide analog used to treat Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide fumarateJ Med Virol9232933820203177796510.1002/jmv.25644 TsengTCLiuCJYangHCSuTHWangCCChenCLKuoSFLiuCHChenPJChenDSKaoJHHigh levels of hepatitis B surface antigen increase risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with low HBV loadGastroenterology14211401149.e3quiz e13-420122233395010.1053/j.gastro.2012.02.007 ChoiJKimHJLeeJChoSKoMJLimYSRisk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients treated with entecavir vs. tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B: A Korean nationwide cohort studyJAMA Oncol5303620193026708010.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4070 YipTCWongVWChanHLTseYKLuiGCWongGLTenofovir is associated with lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma than entecavir in patients with chronic HBV infection in ChinaGastroenterology158215225.e620193157426810.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.025 MurataKAsanoMMatsumotoASugiyamaMNishidaNTanakaEInoueTSakamotoMEnomotoNShirasakiTInduction of IFN-λ3 as an additional effect of nucleotide, not nucleoside, analogues: A new potential target for HBV infectionGut6736237120182778965910.1136/gutjnl-2016-312653 TanjiNTanjiKKambhamNMarkowitzGSBellAD'agatiVDAdefovir nephrotoxicity: Possible role of mitochondrial DNA depletionHum Pathol3273474020011148617210.1053/hupa.2001.25586 IzzedineHLaunay-VacherVIsnard-BagnisCDerayGDrug-induced Fanconi's syndromeAm J Kidney Dis4129230920031255249010.1053/ajkd.2003.50037 SunLYiDSunWWangCRetrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of adefovir dipivoxil-induced Fanconi's syndrome in the Chinese populationJ Clin Pharm Ther4572272820203240612310.1111/jcpt.13154 ServaisALechatPZahrNUrienSAymardGJaudonMCDerayGIsnard BagnisCTubular transporters and clearance of adefovirEur J Pharmacol54016817420061675697310.1016/j.ejphar.2006.04.047 SanyalABassNMullenKPoordadFShawAMerchantKBorteyEForbesWPHuangSA drug transporter gene polymorphism predicts renal tubular toxicity in patients with chronic hepatitis B on long-term adefovir and lamivudine combinationJ Hepatol52S72010 Fernandez-FernandezBMontoya-FerrerASanzABSanchez-NiñoMDIzquierdoMCPovedaJSainz-PrestelVOrtiz-MartinNParra-RodriguezASelgasRTenofovir nephrotoxicity: 2011 updateAIDS Res Treat201135490820112171671910.1155/2011/354908 PapaleoAWarszawskiJSalomonRJullienVVeberFDechauxMBlancheSIncreased beta-2 microglobulinuria in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected children and adolescents treated with tenofovirPediatr Infect Dis J2694995120071790180210.1097/INF.0b013e3181256570 GatanagaHTachikawaNKikuchiYTeruyaKGenkaIHondaMTanumaJYazakiHUedaAKimuraSOkaSUrinary beta2-microglobulin as a possible sensitive marker for renal injury caused by tenofovir disoproxil fumarateAIDS Res Hum Retroviruses2274474820061691082910.1089/aid.2006.22.744 DauchyFALawson-AyayiSde La FailleRBonnetFRigothierCMehsenNMiremont-SalaméGCazanaveCGreibCDabisFDuponMIncreased risk of abnormal proximal renal tubular function with HIV infection and antiretroviral therapyKidney Int8030230920112154406610.1038/ki.2011.124 ShimizuMFurusyoNIkezakiHOgawaEHayashiTIharaTHaradaYToyodaKMurataMHayashiJPredictors of kidney tubular dysfunction induced by adefovir treatment for chronic hepatitis BWorld J Gastroenterol212116212320152571724610.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2116 FongTLLeeBTTienAChangMLimCAhnABaeHSImprovement of bone mineral density and markers of proximal renal tubular function in chronic hepatitis B patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamideJ Viral Hepat2656156720193057608510.1111/jvh.13053 KanekoSKurosakiMTamakiNItakuraJHayashiTKirinoSOsawaLWatakabeKOkadaMWangWTenofovir alafenamide for hepatitis B virus infection including switching therapy from tenofovir disoproxil fumarateJ Gastroenterol Hepatol342004201020193101768910.1111/jgh.14686 TamakiNKurosakiMNakanishiHItakuraJInadaKKirinoSYamashitaKOsawaLSekiguchiSHayakawaYComparison of medication adherence and satisfaction between entecavir and tenofovir alafenamide therapy in chronic hepatitis BJ Med Virol921355135820203199473710.1002/jmv.25692

Mean reduction or improvement rate from baseline to 6 months after tenofovir alafenamide switching between the NA long-term group and the short-term group. Results of (A) serum HBsAg levels, (B) serum ALP levels, (C) serum BAP levels and (D) U-BMG/Cr levels. *P<0.05. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BAP, bone specific alkaline phosphatase; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; NA, nucleos(t)ide analogs; U-BMG/Cr, urine β2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio.

Baseline characteristics of patients receiving NA treatment.

Parameterc Total, n=33 Long-term group, n=19 Short-term group, n=14 P-valued
Age, years, 62±9 61±10 62±9 0.9564
Male: 23 (70%): 13 (68%): 10 (71%): 1.0000
female (%) 10 (30%) 6 (32%) 4 (29%)  
BMI, kg/m2 21.8±2.9 21.7±2.3 22.0±3.6 0.7987
With cirrhosis 1 (3%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 1.0000
With hypertension 9 (27%) 2 (11%) 7 (50%) 0.0191a
With diabetes mellitus 5 (15%) 3 (16%) 2 (14%) 1.0000
Latest NA regimen for TAF-based therapy n (%)        
     ADV single 1 (3%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%) 1.0000
     TDF single 11 (33%) 2 (11%) 9 (64%) 0.0023a
     LAM single 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)  
     ETV single 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)  
     ADV + LAM 6 (18%) 6 (32%) 0 (0%) 0.0272a
     ADV + ETV 2 (6%) 1 (5%) 1 (7%) 1.0000
     TDF + LAM 7 (21%) 7 (37%) 0 (0%) 0.0126a
     TDF + ETV 6 (18%) 2 (11%) 4 (29%) 0.3631
Past NA treatment before TAF-based therapy, n (%)        
     ADV 21 (64%) 19 (100%) 2 (14%) <0.0001b
     TDF 24 (73%) 11 (58%) 13 (93%) 0.0466
     LAM 19 (58%) 19 (100%) 0 (0%) <0.0001b
     ETV 12 (36%) 3 (16%) 9 (64%) 0.0091
Duration of all NA treatments, years 11.2±6.3 16.1±2.4 4.6±2.7 <0.001b
Duration of prior NA treatment, years        
     ADV 9.8±3.0 10.5±2.1 3.3±0.4 0.027a
     TDF 2.0±0.8 1.8±0.8 2.2±0.8 0.2124
     LAM 13.5±4.0 13.5±4.0 0 <0.0001b
     ETV 4.7±2.8 4.8±3.8 4.7±2.6 1.0000
HBeAg-positive 11 (33%) 3 (33%) 8 (57%) 0.0240a
HBV DNA positive, >1.3 Log IU/ml, n (%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)  
HBsAg, IU/ml 1,126±1,724 590±641 1,853±2,400 0.0974
AST, U/l 24.9±7.7 25.5±9.5 24.1±4.3 0.7288
ALT, U/l 23.1±11.1 24.6±13.5 21.1±6.4 0.8695
ALP, U/l 320±126 324±141 298±86 0.7021
BAP, µg/l 19.7±9.0 21.1±11.0 17.9±5.1 0.6358
Total bilirubin, mg/dl 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.4 0.8979
Platelets, x103/mm3 189±60 183±63 197±58 0.5599
Creatinine, mg/dl 0.8±0.2 0.9±0.3 0.8±0.2 0.2743
eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 73.4±13.7 68.4±17.5 77.9±18.1 0.1837
Serum Ca, mmol/l 9.3±0.4 9.4±0.4 9.3±0.2 0.3158
Serum P, mmol/l 3.1±0.5 3.1±0.6 3.1±0.5 0.9274
U-BMG/Cr, µg/g·Cre 5,224±17,471 8,636±23,026 951±1,455 0.0558
U-NAG/Cr, U/g·Cre 9.2±8.9 10.8±11.5 7.2±3.1 0.8698
%TRP, % 85.0±9.3 82.5±11.4 88.1±4.5 0.1719
TmP/GFR, mg/dl 2.6±0.6 2.6±0.7 2.7±0.5 0.5478

aP<0.05,

bP<0.001.

cData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%).

dP-values are for the comparison between the long-term and short-term groups. ADV, adefovir dipivoxil; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BAP, bone specific alkaline phosphatase; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ETV, entecavir; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; LAM, lamivudine; NA, nucleos(t)ide analogs; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TmP/GFR, tubular maximum for phosphate corrected for the glomerular filtration rate; TRP, tubular reabsorption of phosphate; U-BMG/Cr, urine β2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio; U-NAG/Cr, urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase-creatinine ratio.

Time course observation of virological markers and hepatobiliary enzyme levels.

Parametersd Baseline 3 months 6 months P-valuee
Total, n=33        
     HBeAg-positive 11 (33%) 10 (30%) 10 (30%) 1.0000
     HBV DNA positive, >1.3 Log IU/ml 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)  
     HBsAg, IU/ml 1,126±1,724 1,032±1,648 1,001±1,591 0.0001c
     AST, U/l 24.9±7.7 23.5±6.6 26.6±14.2 0.7459
     ALT, U/l 23.1±11.1 22.6±12.4 24.5±14.5 0.5044
     ALP, U/l 320±126 295±135 283±124 0.028a
     BAP, µg/l 19.7±9.0 N/A 17.7±8.0 0.0006c
     Total bilirubin, mg/dl 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.3 0.9821
Long-term group, n=19        
     HBsAg IU/ml 590±641 523±613 537±598 0.0108a
     AST, U/l 25.5±9.5 23.9±6.7 24.0±7.1 0.2982
     ALT, U/l 24.6±13.5 23.5±15.3 22.2±12.4 0.1329
     ALP, U/l 324±141 310±159 302±151 0.0281a
     BAP, µg/l 21.1±11.0 N/A 19.2±9.7 0.0678
Total bilirubin, mg/dl 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.3 0.1221
Short-term group, n=14        
     HBsAg, IU/ml 1,853±2,400 1,796±2,350 1,631±2,235 0.004b
     AST, U/l 24.1±4.3 23.0±6.6 30.1±20.2 0.4121
     ALT, U/l 21.1±6.4 21.2±6.1 27.6±16.9 0.5093
     ALP, U/l 298±86 255±73 257±69 0.005b
     BAP, µg/l 17.9±5.1 N/A 15.5±4.6 0.0016b
     Total bilirubin, mg/dl 0.9±0.4 0.9±0.4 0.9±0.3 0.1016

aP<0.05,

bP<0.01,

cP<0.001.

dData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%).

eP-values are for the comparison between baseline and 6 months after tenofovir alafenamide switching. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BAP, bone specific alkaline phosphatase; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBV, hepatitis B virus; N/A, not available.

Time course observation of renal and tubular function, and phosphorus metabolism.

Parametersb Baseline 3 months 6 months P-valuec
Total, n=33        
     Creatinine, mg/dl 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.2 0.0744
     eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 73.4±13.7 75.2±21.7 75.8±20.9 0.1047
     Serum Ca, mmol/l 9.3±0.4 9.2±0.4 9.3±0.4 0.4241
     Serum P, mmol/l 3.1±0.5 3.1±0.4 3.1±0.5 0.9165
     U-BMG/Cr, µg/g·Cre 5,224±17,471 3,702±13,769 3,547±14,652 0.002a
     U-NAG/Cr, U/g·Cre 9.2±8.9 8.8±10.2 9.2±9.5 0.8068
     %TRP 85.0±9.3 84.0±10.0 85.8±8.8 0.3750
     TmP/GFR, mg/dl 2.6±0.6 2.6±0.5 2.6±0.6 0.8476
Long-term group, n=19        
     Creatinine, mg/dl 0.9±0.3 0.9±0.2 0.8±0.2 0.0890
     eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 68.4±17.5 69.9±17.8 70.9±17.4 0.1719
     Serum Ca, mmol/l 9.4±0.4 9.3±0.4 9.3±0.3 0.4880
     Serum P, mmol/l 3.1±0.6 3.1±0.4 3.0±0.4 0.7553
     U-BMG/Cr, µg/g·Cre 8,636±23,026 6,191±17,858 5,815±19,200 0.0017a
     U-NAG/Cr, U/g·Cre 10.8±11.5 11.1±13.1 10.8±12.1 0.7575
     %TRP 82.5±11.4 81.2±12.0 85.0±10.7 0.0602
     TmP/GFR, mg/dl 2.6±0.7 2.5±0.6 2.6±0.5 0.8673
Short-term group, n=14        
     Creatinine, mg/dl 0.8±0.2 0.8±0.2 0.7±0.2 0.5409
     eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 77.9±18.1 79.0±22.2 82.5±24.0 0.3997
     Serum Ca, mmol/l 9.3±0.2 9.2±0.4 9.2±0.4 0.7471
     Serum P, mmol/l 3.1±0.5 3.1±0.4 3.1±0.7 0.5535
     U-BMG/Cr, µg/g·Cre 951±1,455 262±179 469±549 0.0052a
     U-NAG/Cr, U/g·Cre 7.2±3.1 5.6±2.1 7.0±3.5 1.0000
     %TRP 88.1±4.5 87.5±3.9 87.0±5.4 0.2958
     TmP/GFR, mg/dl 2.7±0.5 2.7±0.4 2.7±0.7 0.9875

aP<0.01.

bData are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

cP-values are for the comparison between baseline and 6 months after tenofovir alafenamide switching. Ca, calcium; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; P, phosphate; TRP, tubular reabsorption of phosphate; U-BMG/Cr, urine β2-microglobulin-creatinine ratio; U-NAG/Cr, urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase-creatinine ratio.