<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MCO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Molecular and Clinical Oncology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2049-9450</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2049-9469</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MCO-0-0-02216</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mco.2021.2216</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio predicts poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radial cystectomy</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Kuroda</surname><given-names>Kenji</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="aff"/>
<xref rid="c1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="corresp"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tasaki</surname><given-names>Shinsuke</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Horiguchi</surname><given-names>Akio</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>Keiichi</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-mco-0-0-02216">Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8513, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-mco-0-0-02216"><italic>Correspondence to:</italic> Dr Kenji Kuroda, Department of Urology, National Defense Medical College, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-8513, Japan <email>kksmy@sa2.so-net.ne.jp</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>03</month>
<year>2021</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year></pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<elocation-id>54</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Kuroda et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the postoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radial cystectomy. The present study retrospectively reviewed 102 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and were followed for &#x2265;6 months postoperatively at our institution, and evaluated clinicopathological factors and laboratory parameters for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and extraurothelial recurrence-free survival (ERFS). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that only postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 &#x005B;hazard ratio (HR), 3.368; 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI), 1.674-6.731; P&#x003C;0.001&#x005D; was an independent factor for poor CSS rate. Higher postoperative CAR was also the only significant factor for shortened ERFS time (HR, 2.401; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.196-4.684; P=0.015). No significant association was identified between postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 and any pathological factors or postoperative laboratory markers besides postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Furthermore, postoperative CAR (&#x2265;0.27) was an independent factor for poor CSS and ERFS rates in 48 patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;pT3) in the multivariate analysis (P=0.026 and P=0.036, respectively). A higher postoperative CAR value can provide additional information about the possibility of poor CSS and ERFS rates in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>bladder cancer</kwd>
<kwd>radical cystectomy</kwd>
<kwd>postoperative marker</kwd>
<kwd>C-reactive protein</kwd>
<kwd>albumin</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Bladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer in the world, with approximately 550,000 new cases and 200,000 deaths in 2018(<xref rid="b1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). Approximately 25&#x0025; of bladder cancer patients present with muscle-invasive bladder cancer at the time of diagnosis. This indicates a high possibility of metastasis and of affecting survival (<xref rid="b2-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>).</p>
<p>Radical cystectomy is an aggressive, conventional and standard therapeutic option for patients with muscle-invasive or bacillus Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin (BCG)-refractory non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Postoperative survival time has a high association with the pathological status at the time of radical cystectomy. In patients with stage II or III bladder carcinoma, the 5-year survival rates range from 50 to 80&#x0025; (<xref rid="b3-mco-0-0-02216 b4-mco-0-0-02216 b5-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">3-5</xref>). However, clinicopathological data alone has been insufficient for deciding the optimal treatment option (<xref rid="b6-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). Based on poor surgical outcomes after radical cystectomy, the optimal postoperative monitoring option for high-risk bladder carcinoma is required.</p>
<p>There has been accumulating evidence supporting the rationale for the association of systemic inflammatory response (SIR) with tumor development and progression (<xref rid="b7-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). Proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors are released into the systemic circulation as factors for SIR. In addition, it has been speculated that tumor growth factors expedite the release of cytokines from tissues. SIR may be activated secondary to local tissue damage caused by mutual responses between tumor necrosis factors and original cancer cells (<xref rid="b8-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). These SIR markers include C-reactive protein (CRP), the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02216 b10-mco-0-0-02216 b11-mco-0-0-02216 b12-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">9-12</xref>). In addition, nutritional status, such as lower levels of serum albumin (Alb) and low body mass index, is associated with worse clinical outcomes postoperatively in patients with carcinoma, and CRP to Alb ratio (CAR), in combination with the systemic status of inflammation and nutrition, has been reported as an independent prognosticator in some types of carcinoma (<xref rid="b13-mco-0-0-02216 b14-mco-0-0-02216 b15-mco-0-0-02216 b16-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">13-16</xref>).</p>
<p>SIR markers have been measured preoperatively (<xref rid="b13-mco-0-0-02216 b14-mco-0-0-02216 b15-mco-0-0-02216 b16-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">13-16</xref>), but nutritional or inflammatory status needs to be stable before surgery or other invasive treatment. However, reports suggest postoperative SIR markers have potential prognostic significance, especially in patients with urothelial carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, only a few studies have investigated the association of postoperative NLR and poor prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract and bladder urothelial carcinoma (<xref rid="b17-mco-0-0-02216 b18-mco-0-0-02216 b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">17-19</xref>). Therefore, we sought to examine postoperative, as well as preoperative SIR markers, including CAR, to determine independent factors of poor prognosis in locally advanced bladder cancer.</p>
<p>In the present study, we retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological and laboratory data of patients with bladder carcinoma who underwent radical cystectomy at National Defense Medical College (single center) to clarify whether postoperative CAR could be an independent prognostic factor for shorter time to cancer-specific death and/or extraurothelial recurrence.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Patients|methods">
<title>Patients and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patients</title>
<p>The medical records of 102 patients who underwent radical cystectomy between January 2007 and January 2020 and who were pathologically diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma before or at the time of cystectomy were retrospectively reviewed. They were followed for at least 6 months postoperatively at our institution. The study protocol (ID 2734) was accepted on June 14, 2017, by National Defense Medical College Ethics Committee, and an opt-out approach on the web page of the National Defense Medical College was used instead of collecting written informed consent from all participants.</p>
<p>A total of 80 males and 22 females with a median age of 71 years (range, 49-83 years) were included in the present study. The median follow-up period after surgery was 38.9 months (range, 6.1-162.2 months). <xref rid="tI-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table I</xref> shows additional clinicopathological and laboratory data. The absence of tumor from the histopathological examination of the cystectomy specimen is interpreted as pT0, which translated to 22 pT0 patients.</p>
<p>Extraurothelial recurrence after radical cystectomy indicates tumor recurrence outside the bladder or distant metastasis. In the present study, we defined recurrence-free survival as extraurothelial recurrence-free survival (ERFS).</p>
<p>The method of lymphadenectomy was the same as that described in earlier studies (<xref rid="b20-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b21-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). All patients received regional lymphadenectomy, and 21 showed positive lymph node metastasis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 47 patients, 22 of whom developed postoperative recurrence or distant metastasis.</p>
<p>As part of postoperative chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 11 patients with histologically confirmed lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or pathologically determined pT3 or pT4 cancer, and salvage chemotherapy was administered to 26 patients who developed recurrence and/or distant metastasis after surgery. Both adjuvant and salvage chemotherapy were administered to 5 patients. The dose of cisplatin was adjusted according to the renal function of the patient.</p>
<p>All surgical specimens were processed according to standard pathological procedures and were histologically confirmed to be urothelial carcinoma with or without other tumor cell types. The pathological staging of the primary tumor (pT) was determined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Classification (<xref rid="b22-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>), whereas tumor grading was determined according to the 2004 WHO classification of urothelial tumors (<xref rid="b23-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">23</xref>). Tumor specimens were evaluated by two pathologists, and the patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the 2004 WHO classification system for tumor grading.</p>
<p>Each patient was monitored for local recurrence or distant metastasis every 3-6 months for the first 5 years after cystectomy and 6-12 months thereafter.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Estimated glomerular filtration rate and inflammatory indices</title>
<p>Preoperative laboratory tests were performed within 1 week before cystectomy, and postoperative laboratory tests was measured 1 to 2 months after surgery. In cases requiring postoperative chemotherapy, the postoperative blood examination was performed prior to postoperative chemotherapy. None of the patients enrolled in the present study had inflammatory diseases or hematological disorders at the time of blood tests.</p>
<p>The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by computation using the following formula:</p>
<p>eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)=194x(serum creatinine)<sup>-1.094</sup> x Age<sup>-0.287</sup> x(0.739, for women).</p>
<p>This formula is the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation, a modified equation from the IDMS MDRD Study with a coefficient derived from data by the Japanese Society of Nephrology-Chronic Kidney Disease Initiatives (JSN-CKDI). This formula has been reported to be more accurate for hospitalized Japanese patients with an eGFR of &#x003C;60 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> than the original IDMS MDRD Study Equation (<xref rid="b24-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>).</p>
<p>Inflammatory indices were calculated as follows. CAR was calculated by dividing the CRP value (mg/dl) by the Alb value (g/dl) (<xref rid="b10-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count (<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was calculated by dividing the absolute platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count (<xref rid="b11-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent factors for shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS) and ERFS time. In addition, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values of eGFR, CAR, NLR and PLR according to the method shown in earlier studies (<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b25-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). We also applied the cut-off values determined on the basis of CSS rate, according to previous reports (<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b25-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). Fisher&#x0027;s exact probability test was performed to examine the relationship between postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 and any other pathological factors or postoperative laboratory markers. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical differences among them were evaluated using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed with JMP Pro 14 (SAS Institute). A P-value &#x003C;0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Independent factors for shortened CSS and ERFS time in all patients</title>
<p>ROC analysis revealed that patients with preoperative eGFR &#x2264;46.88, postoperative eGFR &#x2264;48.02, preoperative CAR &#x2265;0.17, postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27, preoperative NLR &#x2265;2.46, postoperative NLR &#x2265;2.19, preoperative PLR &#x2265;94.80 and postoperative PLR &#x2265;105.23 had a higher association with cancer-specific death than patients without these conditions. As to eGFR, we considered 45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> was a practical threshold in the present study. The ROC curves for postoperative CAR for cancer-specific death and extraurothelial recurrence are shown in <xref rid="f1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref> and <xref rid="f1-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">B</xref>. The postoperative CAR threshold was 0.27 for both CSS and ERFS.</p>
<p>A Cox proportional hazards model was performed to prove CAR was a more useful marker than CRP alone or Alb alone. On a univariate analysis, significantly shorter cancer-specific survival was associated with postoperative CRP &#x2265;0.6 &#x005B;hazard ratio (HR), 3.249; 95&#x0025; confidence interval (CI), 1.713-6.204; P&#x003C;0.001&#x005D;, postoperative Alb &#x2264;3.4 &#x005B;HR, 3.624; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.822-6.938; P&#x003C;0.001&#x005D;, and postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 &#x005B;HR, 4.209; 95&#x0025; CI, 2.201-7.992; P&#x003C;0.001&#x005D;. Therefore, postoperative CAR was used according to HR. Additionally, preoperative CAR was also used.</p>
<p>Another Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to detect the independent clinicopathological factors and laboratory parameters for shortened CSS time. Among these factors, in a univariate analysis, pT stage, tumor grade, LVI, preoperative eGFR, preoperative CAR, and postoperative CAR were found to be independent factors for shortened CSS time (P&#x003C;0.001, P=0.014, P&#x003C;0.001, P=0.013, P=0.017, P&#x003C;0.001, respectively). Among these independent factors in univariate analysis, only postoperative CAR (&#x2265;0.27) was an independent factor for worse CSS rate in the multivariate analysis &#x005B;HR, 3.368; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.674-6.731; P&#x003C;0.001&#x005D; (<xref rid="tII-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>).</p>
<p>In another univariate analysis, ERFS time was found to be shorter in patients with higher pT stage, high tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, LVI, preoperative eGFR &#x003C;45, preoperative CAR &#x2265;0.17, postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27, and preoperative PLR &#x2265;94.80 (P=0.002, P=0.011, P=0.039, P=0.007, P=0.015, P=0.032, P&#x003C;0.001, P=0.037, respectively). Among these independent factors in univariate analysis, only postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 was found to act as an independent factor for worse ERFS rate in the multivariate analysis (HR, 2.401; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.196-4.684; P=0.015) (<xref rid="tIII-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table III</xref>). Age, sex, body mass index, urine cytology, smoking history, history of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, recurrent or primary tumor, reason for radical cystectomy, and the presence of histological subtypes were not independent predictors of worse CSS or ERFS rates in univariate analysis (data not shown).</p>
<p>Postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 was observed in 25 (24.5&#x0025;) patients. A statistically significant association was observed between postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 and postoperative NLR &#x2265;2.19 (P=0.012), but there was not any significant association between postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 and any other pathological factors or postoperative laboratory markers (<xref rid="tIV-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table IV</xref>).</p>
<p>The Kaplan-Meier curves and the results of the log-rank test revealed a significant difference in the CSS and ERFS rates between all patients with and without postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 (both P&#x003C;0.001) (<xref rid="f2-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2A</xref> and <xref rid="f2-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Independent factors for shortened CSS and ERFS time in patients with advanced pT stage</title>
<p>Next, we sought to establish the independent factors of shorter CSS rates in patients with higher pT stage (&#x2265;T3). A Cox proportional hazards model was generated to determine the independent factors of shortened CSS rates among clinicopathological factors and laboratory parameters in 48 advanced pT stage (&#x2265;pT3) patients. In a univariate analysis, postoperative CAR and preoperative PLR were found to be independent factors for shortened CSS time (P=0.006, P=0.038, respectively). Among these independent factors in univariate analysis, only postoperative CAR (&#x2265;0.27) was an independent factor for worse CSS rate in the multivariate analysis (HR, 2.600; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.126-5.833; P=0.026) (<xref rid="tV-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table V</xref>).</p>
<p>Another univariate analysis of Cox proportional hazards model revealed that ERFS time was found to be shorter in patients with postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 and preoperative PLR &#x2265;94.80 (P=0.012, P=0.038, respectively). Among these independent factors in univariate analysis, only postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 was found to act as an independent factor for worse ERFS rate in the multivariate analysis (HR, 2.399; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.062-5.297; P=0.036) (<xref rid="tVI-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="table">Table VI</xref>).</p>
<p>The Kaplan-Meier curves and the results of the log-rank test revealed significant differences in the CSS and ERFS rates between &#x2265;pT3 patients with and without postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 (P=0.003, P=0.006, respectively) (<xref rid="f3-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3A</xref> and <xref rid="f3-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">B</xref>).</p>
<p>In total, 28 (58.3&#x0025;) patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3) received postoperative chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 7 patients, and salvage chemotherapy was administered to 16 patients. Both adjuvant and salvage chemotherapy were administered to 5 patients. A total of 24 patients (85.7&#x0025;) received cisplatin plus gemcitabine, 2 (7.1&#x0025;) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine, and 2 (7.1&#x0025;) received carboplatin plus gemcitabine. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was three. Compared with those who underwent surgical treatment alone, patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3) who received postoperative chemotherapy showed significantly worse CSS or ERFS rates (P=0.044, P=0.005, respectively) (<xref rid="f4-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4A</xref> and <xref rid="f4-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="fig">B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, only postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 was an independent predictor of worse CSS as well as ERFS rates. Other laboratory parameters, such as eGFR, NLR, and PLR were found to be independent factors for shortened CSS time in univariate analyses but not independent factors in multivariate analyses. Although we added clinicopathological factors such as pathological T stage, tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, and LVI, postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 was designated as an only prognostic factor for worse CSS and ERFS rates in multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazards model. Postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27 did not have any significant association with pathological factors or postoperative laboratory parameters besides preoperative NLR, which means postoperative CAR is independent of pathological factors. We also performed multivariate analysis in patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3) and found that higher postoperative CAR was the only independent predictor of poor CSS (HR, 2.600; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.126-5.833; P=0.026) and ERFS rates (HR, 2.399; 95&#x0025; CI, 1.062-5.297; P=0.036). We also found that postoperative chemotherapy did not improve prognosis in patients with advanced pT stage. This may be because 21 out of 28 patients (75&#x0025;) received salvage chemotherapy, and a higher postoperative CAR could facilitate monitoring of patients with &#x2265;pT3 after radical cystectomy.</p>
<p>CIS at radical cystectomy is known to increase the risk of recurrence, especially in organ-confined patients (<xref rid="b26-mco-0-0-02216 b27-mco-0-0-02216 b28-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">26-28</xref>). However, out of 10 patients with CIS, two had advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3), one showed LVI, and other two had higher postoperative CAR (&#x2265;0.27) in the present study. This may explain why patients with CIS did not show worse survival in this study.</p>
<p>Numerous studies have demonstrated an association between preoperative NLR and survival (<xref rid="b9-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b29-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>,<xref rid="b30-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). Conversely, some studies investigated whether postoperative SIR markers could be an effective prognostic marker for patients with clinically localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b31-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). Subsequently, postoperative NLR has been suggested as a beneficial prognostic marker not only in urothelial carcinoma (<xref rid="b17-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>,<xref rid="b18-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>), but also in other carcinomas (<xref rid="b32-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>,<xref rid="b33-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). Preoperative NLR only reflects the balance host protumor inflammatory status and antitumor immune status before surgery, whereas postoperative NLR indicates the balance between tumor inflammatory response and host immune response after surgical removal of the tumor, which should provide a more precise indication of treatment response (<xref rid="b33-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>).</p>
<p>On a similar note to papers reporting on the prognostic value of NLR, several studies have investigated presurgical or pretreatment CAR as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with several types of tumors (<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-02216 b15-mco-0-0-02216 b16-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">14-16</xref>). The prognostic value of postoperative CAR has remained unclear in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, although several reports have implied clinical significance of postoperative CRP (<xref rid="b31-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>,<xref rid="b34-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>). The present study demonstrated that high postoperative CAR levels were significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. Patients with higher postoperative CAR also exhibited a significantly worse prognosis compared with those with lower postoperative CAR, even among those with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3). Based on this finding and in relation to earlier suggestions (<xref rid="b19-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="b33-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>), this may be because higher postoperative CAR possibly indicates potential residual cancer, including micrometastases, whereas preoperative CAR values indicate the presence of the primary tumor and potential micrometastatic lesions. This is the reason why higher preoperative CAR is an independent factor only in univariate analysis, whereas higher postoperative CAR is an independent predictor of worse CSS and ERFS rates in multivariate analysis. Thus, if postoperative CAR reflects micrometastases, it is potentially a significant prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer undergoing surgical treatment.</p>
<p>Approximately 20&#x0025; of all cancer-related deaths are attributable to malnutrition (<xref rid="b35-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). In addition, malnutrition is present in 40-80&#x0025; of all patients with cancer at some stage during the clinical course of their disease (<xref rid="b35-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>). Malnutrition and inflammation suppress the synthesis of serum Alb, which is an indicator of the nutritional status of patients, as well as the severity, progression, and prognosis of the disease (<xref rid="b36-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">36</xref>). Serum Alb is an independent predictor of clinical outcomes in various cancers (<xref rid="b37-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">37</xref>,<xref rid="b38-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">38</xref>). Moreover, many studies have combined CRP and Alb to create new SIR markers, such as GPS and CAR. In fact, both GPS and CAR are independent indicators of poor survival in various types of cancer (<xref rid="b12-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b14-mco-0-0-02216 b15-mco-0-0-02216 b16-mco-0-0-02216" ref-type="bibr">14-16</xref>). In the present study, CAR was applied as a variable because CAR is a continuous value compared with GPS, which is a dichotomous variable, although it was required to determine the cut-off values for cancer-specific death and/or extraurothelial recurrence.</p>
<p>This study has some potential limitations. First, our sample size was relatively small, although the CSS and ERFS rates were evaluated as our clinical endpoint. With a longer follow-up and a larger sample population, the statistical strength of our study can be reinforced, leading to more precise prognosis. Second, we could not clarify the background between postoperative CAR and worse survival rates in patients with advanced bladder cancer, although the possible implications for patients with a higher postoperative CAR value are suggested. Third, several other factors that may have influenced the inflammatory status, such as diabetes mellitus and/or hyperlipidemia, were not included in the present study. However, we deemed these conditions had only minimal influence on the values of inflammatory indices because body mass index did not have any significant association with prognosis (data not shown). Notwithstanding these limitations, our data indicate that a higher postoperative CAR can be an independent prognostic factor for worse survival rates.</p>
<p>In summary, a higher postoperative CAR value can provide additional information about the possibility of worse CSS and ERFS rates.</p>
<p>In conclusion, among the patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, survival rates are worse in those with higher postoperative CAR values than in those with lower postoperative CAR values. Therefore, patients with higher postoperative CAR should undergo additional treatment or at least careful follow-up.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</ack>
<sec>
<title>Funding</title>
<p>No funding was received.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; contributions</title>
<p>KK, ST, AH and KI were involved in the conception and design of the study. KK, ST, AH and KI collected the data, and KK analyzed the data. KK drafted the manuscript. KK and KI reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title>
<p>All procedures performed in the studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the National Defense Medical College (Saitama, Japan; ID 2734). The study protocol was accepted on June 14, 2017, by the National Defense Medical College Ethics Committee, and an opt-out approach on the web page of the National Defense Medical College was used instead of collecting written informed consent from all participants.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient consent for publication</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-mco-0-0-02216"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bray</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferlay</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Soerjomataram</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Siegel</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Torre</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><name><surname>Jemal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries</article-title><source>CA Cancer J Clin</source><volume>68</volume><fpage>394</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30207593</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21492</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-mco-0-0-02216"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><comment>National collaborating centre for cancer (UK): Bladder cancer: Diagnosis and management, 2015.</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-mco-0-0-02216"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shariat</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name><name><surname>Karakiewicz</surname><given-names>PI</given-names></name><name><surname>Palapattu</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lotan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Amiel</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Vazina</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bastian</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sagalowsky</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium</article-title><source>J Urol</source><volume>176</volume><fpage>2414</fpage><lpage>2422</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17085118</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.004</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-mco-0-0-02216"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hautmann</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>de Petriconi</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeiffer</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Volkmer</surname><given-names>BG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: Long-term results in 1100 patients</article-title><source>Eur Urol</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>1039</fpage><lpage>1047</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22381169</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.028</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-mco-0-0-02216"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stein</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Lieskovsky</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Cote</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Groshen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyd</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Skinner</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Bochner</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Thangathurai</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Mikhail</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: Long-term results in 1,054 patients</article-title><source>J Clin Oncol</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>666</fpage><lpage>675</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11157016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-mco-0-0-02216"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Canter</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kutikov</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Plimack</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Saad</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Oblaczynski</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Viterbo</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name><name><surname>Uzzo</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Clinicopathological outcomes after radical cystectomy for clinical T2 urothelial carcinoma: Further evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy</article-title><source>BJU Int</source><volume>107</volume><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>62</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20560950</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09442.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-mco-0-0-02216"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mantovani</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Allavena</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sica</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Balkwill</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cancer-related inflammation</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>454</volume><fpage>436</fpage><lpage>444</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18650914</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature07205</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-mco-0-0-02216"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>McMillan</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Forrest</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>McArdle</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Milroy</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The systemic inflammatory response, weight loss, performance status and survival in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Br J Cancer</source><volume>87</volume><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>267</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12177792</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.bjc.6600466</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-mco-0-0-02216"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwak</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ku</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio can significantly predict mortality outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor</article-title><source>Oncotarget</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>12891</fpage><lpage>12901</lpage><year>2016</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-mco-0-0-02216"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Omae</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kondo</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanabe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>High preoperative C-reactive protein values predict poor survival in patients on chronic hemodialysis undergoing nephrectomy for renal cancer</article-title><source>Urol Oncol</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>e9</fpage><lpage>e13</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25130069</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.07.004</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-mco-0-0-02216"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gunduz</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mutlu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tural</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yildiz</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Uysal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Coskun</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bozcuk</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a new prognostic for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer</article-title><source>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>288</fpage><lpage>292</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25871569</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajco.12358</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-mco-0-0-02216"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuksel</surname><given-names>OH</given-names></name><name><surname>Akan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Uukmez</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Yildirim</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahin</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Verit</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Preoperative Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of primary bladder cancer recurrence</article-title><source>Mol Clin Oncol</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>206</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27330798</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mco.2016.901</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-mco-0-0-02216"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Stratton</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Barocas</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Gregg</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Cookson</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Herrell</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>JA Jr</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Preoperative nutritional status is an important predictor of survival in patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma</article-title><source>Eur Urol</source><volume>59</volume><fpage>923</fpage><lpage>928</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21295907</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.034</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-mco-0-0-02216"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ratio of C-reactive protein/albumin is an inflammatory prognostic score for predicting overall survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Sci Rep</source><volume>5</volume><issue>10481</issue><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26084991</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep10481</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-mco-0-0-02216"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for gastric cancer</article-title><source>Transl Oncol</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26310380</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tranon.2015.06.006</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-mco-0-0-02216"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kinoshita</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Onoda</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Imai</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Iwaku</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Oishi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fushiya</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Koike</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishino</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsushima</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, a novel inflammation-based prognostic score, predicts outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>803</fpage><lpage>810</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25190127</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-014-4048-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-mco-0-0-02216"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morizawa</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyake</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimada</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hori</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tatsumi</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakai</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Anai</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Konishi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujimoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a detection marker of tumor recurrence in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy</article-title><source>Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>257.e11</fpage><lpage>e17</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27038696</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-mco-0-0-02216"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwak</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ku</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The prognostic significance of the early postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder undergoing radical cystectomy</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>335</fpage><lpage>342</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26152275</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-015-4708-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-mco-0-0-02216"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nishihara</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Suekane</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ueda</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakiri</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Igawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>High postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a poorprognostic marker in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma</article-title><source>Oncol Lett</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>5241</fpage><lpage>5250</lpage><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31186740</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/ol.2019.10178</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-mco-0-0-02216"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herr</surname><given-names>HW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: Where and Why!</article-title><source>Eur Urol</source><volume>57</volume><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>213</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19896263</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.028</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-mco-0-0-02216"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghoneim</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdel-Latif</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Mekresh</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Abol-Enein</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mosbah</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashamallah</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Baz</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: 2,720 consecutive cases 5 years later</article-title><source>J Urol</source><volume>180</volume><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18485392</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.024</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-mco-0-0-02216"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sobin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gospodarowicz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wittekind</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><comment>TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edition, 2009.</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-mco-0-0-02216"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>John</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Guido</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jonathan</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Isabell</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><comment>Pathology and genetics: Tumours of the urinary system and male genital system, 2004.</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-mco-0-0-02216"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Imai</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Horio</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nitta</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamagata</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Iseki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsukamoto</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Makino</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hishida</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Modification of the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) Study equation for Japan</article-title><source>Am J Kidney Dis</source><volume>50</volume><fpage>927</fpage><lpage>937</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18037093</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.09.004</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-mco-0-0-02216"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prognostic significance of the CRP/Alb and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing TACE and RFA</article-title><source>J Clin Lab Anal</source><volume>33</volume><issue>e22999</issue><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31418936</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jcla.22999</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-mco-0-0-02216"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Utz</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanash</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Farrow</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The plight of the patient with carcinoma in situ of the bladder</article-title><source>J Urol</source><volume>103</volume><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>164</lpage><year>1970</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5410591</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61913-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-mco-0-0-02216"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stanisic</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Donovan</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebouton</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>5-Year experience with intravesical therapy of carcinoma in situ: An inquiry into the risks of &#x2018;conservative&#x2019; management</article-title><source>J Urol</source><volume>138</volume><fpage>1158</fpage><lpage>1161</lpage><year>1987</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">3118055</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43534-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-mco-0-0-02216"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lamm</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Herr</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Jakse</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuroda</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Mostofi</surname><given-names>FK</given-names></name><name><surname>Okajima</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakamoto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sesterhenn</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>da Silva</surname><given-names>FC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Updated concepts and treatment of carcinoma in situ</article-title><source>Urol Oncol</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>130</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><year>1998</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21227218</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1078-1439(99)00020-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-mco-0-0-02216"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uemura</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawahara</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamashita</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Jikuya</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tatenuma</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yokomizo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Izumi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Teranishi</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Makiyama</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients who received cabazitaxel chemotherapy</article-title><source>Biomed Res Int</source><volume>2017</volume><issue>7538647</issue><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28948170</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/7538647</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-mco-0-0-02216"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasuga</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawahara</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takamoto</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukui</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tokita</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tadenuma</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Narahara</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fusayasu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Terao</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Izumi</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with disease-specific mortality in patients with penile cancer</article-title><source>BMC Cancer</source><volume>16</volume><issue>396</issue><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27386948</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12885-016-2443-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-mco-0-0-02216"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kikuchi</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Shirotake</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanao</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsumoto</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kobayashi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Miyazaki</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ide</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Obata</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoshino</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The predictive value of C-reactive protein for prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A multi-institutional study</article-title><source>Eur Urol</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>227</fpage><lpage>234</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23219372</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.050</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-mco-0-0-02216"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tamura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Toyokawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Muguruma</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Miki</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kubo</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakurai</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirakawa</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ohira</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical relevance of postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 for gastric cancer</article-title><source>Anticancer Res</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>3745</fpage><lpage>3751</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29848737</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21873/anticanres.12655</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-mco-0-0-02216"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kong</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and changes in this ratio predict survival after the complete resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer</article-title><source>Onco Targets Ther</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>6529</fpage><lpage>6537</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27799800</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/OTT.S117290</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-mco-0-0-02216"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albisinni</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Moussa</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Aoun</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Quackels</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Assenmacher</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Peltier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Roumegu&#x00E8;re</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The impact of postoperative inflammatory biomarkers on oncologic outcomes of bladder cancer</article-title><source>Prog Urol</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>270</fpage><lpage>281</lpage><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30954405</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.purol.2019.02.008</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-mco-0-0-02216"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Obermair</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Simunovic</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Isenring</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Janda</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>192</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28173966</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.028</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b36-mco-0-0-02216"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ballmer</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ochsenbein</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Sch&#x00FC;tz-Hofmann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Transcapillary escape rate of albumin positively correlates with plasma albumin concentration in acute but not in chronic inflammatory disease</article-title><source>Metabolism</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>697</fpage><lpage>705</lpage><year>1994</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7515458</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0026-0495(94)90117-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b37-mco-0-0-02216"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>SX</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Modified Glasgow prognostic score is an independent prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy</article-title><source>Int J Clin Exp Pathol</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>5273</fpage><lpage>5281</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26191228</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b38-mco-0-0-02216"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ayhan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>G&#x00FC;nakan</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Alyaz&#x0131;c&#x0131;</surname><given-names>&#x0130;</given-names></name><name><surname>Haberal</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Altunda&#x011F;</surname><given-names>&#x00D6;</given-names></name><name><surname>Dursun</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The preoperative albumin level is an independent prognostic factor for optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Arch Gynecol Obstet</source><volume>296</volume><fpage>989</fpage><lpage>995</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28875365</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00404-017-4511-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Receiver operating characteristic curves for postoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio for (A) cancer-specific mortality and (B) extraurothelial recurrence. The areas under the curves were (A) 0.667 and (B) 0.612. TPF, true positive fraction; FPF, false positive fraction.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-14-03-02216-g00.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f2-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Survival analysis based on postoperative CAR values. There was a significant difference in time to (A) cancer-specific mortality and (B) extraurothelial recurrence between patients with and without postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27. CSS, cancer-specific survival; ERFS, extraurothelial recurrence-free survival; CAR, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-14-03-02216-g01.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f3-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Survival analysis based on postoperative CAR of 48 patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3). There was a significant difference in time to (A) cancer-specific mortality and (B) extraurothelial recurrence between patients with and without postoperative CAR &#x2265;0.27. CSS, cancer-specific survival; ERFS, extraurothelial recurrence-free survival; CAR, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-14-03-02216-g02.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f4-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Survival curves of 48 patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3) who received postoperative chemotherapy. There was a significant difference in time to (A) cancer-specific mortality and (B) extraurothelial recurrence between patients with and without postoperative chemotherapy. CSS, cancer-specific survival; ERFS, extraurothelial recurrence-free survival.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-14-03-02216-g03.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption><p>Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Patients, n</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Clinicopathologic</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Sex</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Men</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Women</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Urine cytology</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Smoking history</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Present</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Absent</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;History of UTUC</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Present</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Absent</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Recurrent or primary tumor</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Recurrent</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Primary</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Reason for cystectomy</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Muscle-invasive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;BCG-refractory</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Histology</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;UC alone</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;UC and other subtypes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;No tumor</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Pathological T stage</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;T3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;T2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor grade</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PUNLMP/low</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymph node metastasis</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Ureteral involvement</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Surgical margins</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymphovascular invasion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;CIS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Laboratory</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative CAR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;0.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;0.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative CAR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;0.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;0.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;2.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;2.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;2.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;2.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative PLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;94.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;94.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative PLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;105.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;105.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; BCG, bacille Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; CIS, carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic>; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent factors for cancer-specific survival.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Univariate</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Multivariate</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Clinicopathological</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Pathological T stage (&#x2265;T3 or &#x2264;T2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.943</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.996-8.344</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.149</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.974-5.070</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.058</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor grade (high or PUNLMP/low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.839</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.211-8.305</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.014</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.363</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.930-7.277</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.072</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymph node metastasis (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.069</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.979-4.079</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.056</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Ureter involvement (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.501</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.361-4.170</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.524</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Surgical margin (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.405</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.419-3.530</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.539</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymphovascular invasion (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.655</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.844-7.992</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.615</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.712-3.942</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.258</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.442</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.072-1.448</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.203</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Laboratory</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.364</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.205-4.501</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.013</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.972</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.949-3.982</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.068</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.767</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.874-3.407</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.110</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.17)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.240</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.163-4.254</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.017</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.320</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.635-2.680</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.451</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.209</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.201-7.992</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.368</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.674-6.731</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.863</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.977-3.606</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.059</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.19)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.667</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.872-3.309</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.123</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;94.80)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.091</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.994-4.112</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.052</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;105.23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.419</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.606-2.950</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.396</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; RC, radical cystectomy; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIII-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table III</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent factors for extraurothelial recurrence-free survival.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Univariate</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Multivariate</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Clinicopathological</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Pathological T stage (&#x2265;T3 or &#x2264;T2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.602</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.412-4.954</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.746</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.819-3.883</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor grade (high or PUNLMP/low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.724</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.238-7.187</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.011</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.867</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.800-5.107</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymph node metastasis (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.114</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.041-4.021</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.039</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.664</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.764-3.466</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Ureter involvement (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.858</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.557-4.622</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.278</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Surgical margin (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.239</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.372-3.079</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.692</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymphovascular invasion (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.323</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.256-4.469</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.007</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.050</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.486-2.346</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.902</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.844</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.253-2.099</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.741</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Laboratory parameters</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.209</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.173-4.055</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.015</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.699</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.858-3.276</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.586</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.824-2.933</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.17)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.987</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.065-3.637</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.032</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.327</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.651-2.623</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.427</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.147</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.684-5.766</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.401</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.196-4.684</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.504</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.823-2.756</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.183</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.19)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.597</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.870-3.030</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.132</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;94.80)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.133</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.049-4.060</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.037</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.888</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.868-3.886</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;105.23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.407</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.633-2.814</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.379</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; RC, radical cystectomy; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tIV-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table IV</label>
<caption><p>Association between postoperative CAR and clinicopathological parameters.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">Postoperative CAR</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Total (&#x0025;) (n=102)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x2265;0.27, n (&#x0025;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x003C;0.27, n (&#x0025;)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Pathological T stage</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;T3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">48 (47.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14 (29.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34 (70.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.360</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2264;T2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">54 (52.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11 (20.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">43 (79.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Tumor grade</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;High</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75 (73.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19 (25.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">56 (74.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x003E;0.999</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;PUNLMP/Low</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27 (26.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6 (22.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21 (77.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Lymph node metastasis</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21 (20.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7 (33.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14 (66.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.393</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81 (79.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18 (22.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63 (77.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Lymphovascular invasion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Positive</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50 (49.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15 (30.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35 (70.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.253</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Negative</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52 (51.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10 (19.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">42 (80.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Postoperative eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29 (28.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9 (31.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20 (69.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.444</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;45</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73 (71.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16 (21.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57 (78.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Postoperative NLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;2.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">55 (53.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19 (34.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36 (65.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;2.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47 (46.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6 (12.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">41 (87.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Postoperative PLR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x2265;105.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85 (83.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20 (23.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65 (76.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.758</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x003C;105.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17 (16.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5 (29.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12 (70.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tV-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table V</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent factors for cancer-specific survival in 48 patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Univariate</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Multivariate</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Clinicopathological</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor grade (high or PUNLMP/low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.527</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.447-9.570</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.546</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymph node metastasis (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.204</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.529-2.599</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.647</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Ureter involvement (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.164</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.346-7.239</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.833</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Surgical margin (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.069</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.410-3.653</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.902</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymphovascular invasion (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.822</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.636-7.675</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.291</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.729</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.041-3.467</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.745</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Laboratory</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.848</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.846-3.951</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.121</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.434</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.631-3.087</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.376</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.17)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.843</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.854-3.952</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.118</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.067</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.398-6.588</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.006</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.600</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.126-5.833</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.270</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.592-2.826</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.541</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.19)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.521</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.706-3.456</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.287</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;94.80)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.586</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.059-5.761</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.038</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.841</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.231-1.381</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;105.23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.489</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.545-3.485</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.409</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; RC, radical cystectomy; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tVI-mco-0-0-02216" position="float">
<label>Table VI</label>
<caption><p>Univariate and multivariate analyses of independent factors for extraurothelial recurrence-free survival in 48 patients with advanced pT stage (&#x2265;T3).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Univariate</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Multivariate</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Hazard ratio</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">95&#x0025; CI</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Clinicopathological</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Tumor grade (high or PUNLMP/low)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.560</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.542-45.733</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.284</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymph node metastasis (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.560</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.702-3.342</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.266</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Ureter involvement (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.051</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.313-6.536</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.945</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Surgical margin (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.050</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.403-3.582</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.928</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Lymphovascular invasion (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.770</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.616-7.465</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.317</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Carcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (positive or negative)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.121</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.063-5.302</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.913</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Laboratory</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.736</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.793-3.727</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative eGFR (&#x003C; or &#x2265;45 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.315</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.579-2.830</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.499</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.17)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.329</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.599-2.841</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.473</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative CAR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;0.27)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.777</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.265-5.971</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.012</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.399</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.062-5.297</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.46)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.004</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.469-2.165</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.992</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative NLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;2.19)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.711</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.786-4.003</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.179</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Preoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;94.80)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.613</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.061-5.902</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.038</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.208-1.230</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;&#x00A0;Postoperative PLR (&#x2265; or &#x003C;105.23)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.416</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.518-3.316</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.469</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; RC, radical cystectomy; BCG, bacillus Calmette-Gu&#x00E9;rin; PUNLMP, papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>); CAR, C-reactive protein (mg/dl) to albumin (g/dl) ratio; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
