MCO Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2049-9450 2049-9469 D.A. Spandidos MCO-0-0-02337 10.3892/mco.2021.2337 Articles Cerebellar preference of luminal A and B type and basal ganglial preference of HER2-positive type breast cancer-derived brain metastases IzutsuNobuyuki 1 2 KinoshitaManabu 1 2 OzakiTomohiko 3 SakaiMio 4 NakanishiKatsuyuki 4 NakayamaTakahiro 5 TamakiYasuhiro 5 KishimaHaruhiko 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan Department of Neurosurgery, Kawachi General Hospital, Higashiosaka, Osaka 578-0954, Japan Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan Correspondence to: Dr Manabu Kinoshita, Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan mail@manabukinoshita.com

Abbreviations: BMs, brain metastases; CNS, central nervous system; CT, computed tomography; DICOM, digital imaging and communications in medicine; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ER, estrogen receptor; FMRIB, functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain; FSL-FLIRT, FMRIB software library/FMRIB linear image registration tool; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NIfTI, neuroimaging informatics technology initiative; PCI, prophylactic cranial irradiation; PgR, progesterone receptor; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer

 09 2021 30 06 2021 15 3 175 15 01 2021 16 06 2021 Copyright: © Izutsu et al. 2020 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of brain metastases could be affected by the biological subtypes of breast cancer. CT (n=1) or MRI (n=66) images of 67 patients with a total of 437 treatment-naive brain metastases from breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the biological subtype of the tumor [luminal A, 28; luminal B, 9; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive, 14; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), 16]. All images were standardized to the human brain MRI atlas provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 database. The distribution pattern of brain metastases after image standardization was analyzed. The cerebellum and the frontal lobe were more commonly affected by breast cancer brain metastases. Brain metastases from luminal A and B types of breast cancer arose more often in the cerebellum. Brain metastases from HER2-positive type breast cancer occurred more often in the putamen and the thalamus and less frequently in the cerebellum than other types (P=0.0057). The subtypes of breast cancer are related to differences in the spatial distributions of their brain metastases. These differences may be utilized to plan different cranial irradiation strategies according to the breast cancer subtypes.

 breast cancer brain metastasis biological subtype spatial distribution Funding: This research was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant no. 19K09526) and the Takeda Science Foundation, and MSD Life Science Foundation. Introduction

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent malignant tumors of the CNS. More than 200,000 patients are diagnosed with harboring BMs in the United States each year, and the number is more than 10-fold of the primary CNS tumors (1). Breast cancer is the second most frequent cause of BMs after lung cancer, and BMs occur in 24.6% of patients with metastatic lesions (2). The reported median survival time from diagnosis of BM ranges from six to 23 months (3). BMs are one of the major causes of systemic cancer-related mortality. Lately, the frequency of BMs is increasing due to advancements in treatment for primary cancers and in imaging techniques (4,5). On the other hand, the heterogeneity of BMs has been consistently reported since the 1950s. While such studies were performed postmortem in early years, image analysis with CT or MRI has recently become the primary research modality for this kind of study. Preferential involvement of the anatomic ‘watershed areas,’ the gray-white matter junction and the cerebellum, has been demonstrated in the development of BMs, and the relationship between the spatial distribution of BMs and primary cancer type has been discussed (6-9). Few reports, however, have discussed the relationship between the spatial distribution of BMs and biological subtypes of breast cancer.

In this report, the authors hypothesized that the spatial distribution of BMs could be affected by the biological subtype of tumors. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared the spatial distributions of breast cancer BMs and biological subtypes.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>Patients and data collection

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the internal review board of the Osaka International Cancer Institute approved the clinical data used in this research. The authors retrospectively reviewed CT or MRI of radiation- and operation-naive breast cancer BMs treated at Osaka International Cancer Institute from 2008 to 2017, totaling 87 patients. Patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy, hormone therapy, molecular targeted therapy with agents such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, or lapatinib, or radiation therapy were included. However, patients who underwent previous neurosurgical resection or brain radiation therapy of the lesion were excluded. Furthermore, the following patients were excluded from analysis: Five patients due to preexisting malignant diseases, three patients lacking a sufficient immunohistochemical profile of their breast cancer subtype, and 12 patients due to CNS lesions confined to the meninges, the dura, or the skull. As a result, BMs of 67 patients using contrast-enhanced CT, gadolinium-enhanced MRI T1-weighted images (1.5 or 3.0T), or plain T2-weighted images were included for analysis (1 by CT, 39 by 1.5T MRI, 27 by 3.0T MRI; 26 by thin slice with <1.5 mm thickness, 41 with 2-7 mm thickness).

 Biological subtypes of breast cancer

Patients were divided into four groups according to the biological subtype of their breast cancer. Selection criteria were based on the expression of hormone receptors (HR) such as estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Classified subtypes were as follows: HR-positive and HER2-negative (i.e., ER+ and/or PgR+, HER2-; luminal A), HR-positive and HER2-positive (ER+ and/or PgR+, HER2+; luminal B), HR-negative and HER2-positive (ER- and PgR-, and HER2+; HER2), and HR-negative and HER2-negative (ER- and PgR-, and HER2-; triple-negative breast cancer; TNBC). Positivity of ER, PgR, and HER2 was evaluated via immunohistochemistry of the primary breast cancer or the BM (66 by primary cancer and one by BM). The threshold for a positive test was set at 1% or greater of cells being positive for ER or PgR. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of HER2 amplification was carried out for cases where immunohistochemistry showed higher than 2+ for HER2. The authors also reviewed medical records to identify the initial symptoms of breast cancer BMs that led to performing brain imaging and compared these symptoms and breast cancer subtypes.

 Image registration and frequency map reconstruction

All Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images were converted to Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative (NIfTI) format using dcm2nii software (http://www.cabiatl.com/mricro/mricron/dcm2nii.html). These NIfTI data were registered to a 1.0-mm isotropic, high-resolution, T1-weighted brain atlas provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI152 database) using a mutual information algorithm with a 12-degree of freedom transformation using the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB) Software Library/FMRIB Linear Image Registration Tool (FSL-FLIRT; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FSL) (Fig. 1). Image registrations were visually confirmed in all cases before using FSL-FLIRT (10,11).

All datasets were exported to in-house software written in MatLab 7.14 (MathWorks) for further analysis. The lesions were manually identified. Thereafter, the center of gravity of each lesion was calculated automatically, and that voxel was defined as the primary site of occurrence. For frequency map reconstruction, all lesions were reconstructed to a site-centered spherical shape with a diameter of 20 mm. A heat map for the lesion occurrence frequency was reconstructed and superimposed on the reference MNI152 (Fig. 2). The voxel corresponding to the center of gravity of the lesion registered to the MNI structural atlas (12) was assigned to 11 segments as follows: Brainstem, caudate, cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, parietal lobe, temporal lobe, pineal body, pituitary gland, putamen, and thalamus. As a result, each lesion was assigned to a specific anatomical region on the MNI152 structural atlas.

 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by JMP 14 (SAS Institute Inc.) and R version 3.5.2 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). All P-values were two-sided, and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were compared between groups using the Chi-square test with residual analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical and continuous variables. If not otherwise indicated, data are shown as medians with an interquartile range.

 Results <sec> <title>Frequency map of metastatic brain lesions from breast cancer

In total, the authors analyzed 437 lesions from 67 patients as follows: 162 lesions from 28 patients with luminal A subtype, 30 lesions from 9 patients with luminal B subtype, 196 lesions from 14 patients with HER2 subtype, and 49 lesions from 16 patients with TNBC. Detailed characteristics of the patients are shown in Table I. There were no significant differences in the median numbers of BMs, the interval time from initial diagnosis of the primary lesion to development of BMs, and the ratio of patients with multiple BMs among biological subtypes.

MRI from 66 patients and CT from one patient were successfully transformed and registered on MNI152. The coordinates corresponding to each lesion's cancer were identified, with all lesions converted to spheres with a 20 mm diameter on MNI152. As can be appreciated in Fig. 2, breast cancer BMs most commonly involved the posterior fossa. This observation was consistent with past studies (6,9,13,14).

 Different intracerebral distribution of breast cancer BMs by biological subtype

There was a significant difference in BMs' intracerebral distribution among subtypes using the Chi-square test (P=0.0057, Table II). Furthermore, the residual analysis revealed that, while BMs from luminal A and B type breast cancer predominantly occurred in the cerebellum with higher proportions than those from the other subtypes, BMs from HER2 breast cancer occurred in the cerebellum with a lower proportion and in the putamen and thalamus with higher proportions than those from the others (Fig. 3). Regarding the TNBC subtype, there were no significant characteristics in common with the other subtypes.

 Anticancer drug therapies before BM occurrence

Most of the patients underwent multiple treatment regimens and various anticancer drugs were administered to each patient before their BMs were discovered. Three patients did not undergo any anticancer drugs because BMs had already occurred at the initial diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Detailed past treatment histories were not available for another three patients from outside institutions. We compared the distributions of BMs between two groups with and without chemotherapies, hormone therapies, and molecular targeted therapies for 431 BMs from 64 patients. There was no statistical significance in these comparisons with P-values being 0.43, 0.13, and 0.09, respectively (Chi-square test).

 Symptoms at brain metastasis identification

The most frequently encountered clinical symptom was undifferentiated dizziness (29.9%), followed by headache (28.4%), and focal signs (17.9%) such as motor aphasia, hemiparesis, and visual disturbances. Seven patients did not present any neurological symptoms (10.4%). There was no significant difference in symptomatology among different breast cancer subtypes (P=0.51, Fig. 4).

 Discussion

Several classifications of biological subtypes based on their clinical, histopathological, and molecular characteristics are used for breast cancers. Furthermore, breast cancers can be grouped by their molecular expression states into luminal A or B, HER2, and triple-negative, and each subtype has different prognoses (15,16). TNBC and HER2 breast cancers are liable to develop BMs (2,3,17-19). Of note, the onset of BMs in TNBC is earlier, and overall survival is notably shorter than other subtypes (2,3). Anatomical watershed areas such as the gray-white matter junction are known as common sites for BMs (7). It is known that the spatial distribution of BMs are affected by the biological features of tumors. For example, the authors have recently reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated lung cancer BMs occurred more frequently in the caudate nucleus, cerebellum, and temporal lobe than those with an EGFR exon 19 deletion (8).

The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate the spatial distribution of BMs from breast cancer in a more objective manner than past reports by using a voxel-based lesion mapping technique. In line with previous reports, the predominance of breast cancer BMs in the posterior fossa was visually confirmed (6,9,13,14). It is speculated that this tendency is due to the difference in blood flow between the cerebrum and the cerebellum (20). This study investigated the correlation between the spatial distributions of breast cancer BMs and their subtypes. The authors ascertained that BMs from luminal A and B type breast cancers concentrated in the cerebellum and these proportions were higher than those of the other subtypes, while HER2 breast cancer BMs occurred more frequently around the basal ganglia and less frequently in the cerebellum than the others. This tendency was inconsistent with previous reports as it was reported that BMs from HER2 positive and luminal type occurred dominantly in occipital lobe and cerebellum (21).

Kyeong et al reported that BMs from luminal type breast cancers were less frequently encountered in the cerebellum and that BMs from the TNBC subtype were more frequently encountered in the frontal lobe. This inconsistency with our findings may have been caused by differences in the segmentation of brain regions and the classification of biological subtypes. In the report by Kyeong et al, the whole brain was divided into 116 segments using the standardized automated anatomical labeling (AAL) template (21,22). Thereafter, those segments were rearranged into seven regions before analysis. This is a different segmentation scheme than employed in this study. Furthermore, Kyeong et al assigned patients with BMs from breast cancer to three groups: Luminal (HR-positive and HER2-negative), HER2 (HER2-positive and HR-positive or HR-negative), and TNBC (HR-negative and HER2-negative). This is different from the classification scheme of the current report. Further study is required to evaluate these differences.

Different metastatic patterns among breast cancer subtypes or among primary cancer entities were reported (23,24). Although the mechanisms causing differences of metastatic patters are not completely clarified, the ‘seed and soil hypothesis’ proposed by Paget is well accepted (25). The hypothesis assumes that compatibility between the biological characteristics of the cancer cells (‘seeds’) and the microenvironment of the metastatic site (‘soil’) plays an important role in cancer metastasis. Some key molecules for this phenomenon in breast cancer metastasis have been reported (26,27).

Regarding symptoms at the time of BM diagnoses, dizziness was the most frequently encountered neurological deficit. This finding could be related to the cerebellar distribution of BMs. On the other hand, screening for BMs was conducted only in 10% of patients as screening for BMs from asymptomatic breast cancer is not yet recommended. As the occurrence of BMs continues to increase in breast cancer patients (4,5), some reports propose clinical trials focusing on the value of BM screening in patients with breast cancer, particularly for subgroups at high risk of BMs (i.e., HER2 or TNBC with extracranial metastatic lesions) (28).

Regarding the treatment of breast cancer BMs, following treatment options are offered to the patients, which are surgical resection, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy (29,30). In addition, a treatment concept of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) targeting breast cancer patients with high BMs risk has been proposed (31) similar to lung cancer. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of PCI for high-risk breast cancer patients was performed, which revealed that patients receiving PCI did not develop BMs, while 6.4% of patients not receiving PCI developed BMs (32). In this context, understanding the characteristics of BMs due to breast cancer subtype may add insight into improving treatment strategies against this diseased condition. This includes the possibility of prophylactic irradiation with dose modulation to sites where BMs preferentially occur. For example, our research suggested that HER2 breast cancer occurred less often in the cerebellum but slightly more often in the putamen and thalamus. This localized treatment would aim for a preventive effect while reducing side effects. Further research of this kind could suggest different radiation dose modulation strategies according to the different subtypes of breast cancer.

This study has some limitations. Firstly, most of the brain lesions were not resected. Therefore, pathohistological diagnoses of brain lesions and concordances of biological subtypes between brain lesions and primary lesions were not confirmed. Secondarily, because of the retrospective analysis and small sample number, we could not analyze the genetic mutations which occurring frequently in breast cancers or associated with cancer metastasis. Likewise, some patients were referred to our department form outside institutions requesting treatment of brain lesions. Therefore, we could not calculate the true incidence of metastasis analyze the correlation between the frequency of metastasis by subtype and the brain region.

As a conclusion, BMs from luminal A and B types occurred more often in the cerebellum, while brain metastases from HER2-positive type breast cancer occurred more often in the putamen and the thalamus, and less frequently in the cerebellum than other types. These findings suggest that spatial distributions of BMs from breast cancers are affected by their biological subtypes.

 Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

 Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 Authors' contributions

NI confirmed the authenticity of the data, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. MK confirmed the authenticity of the data, analyzed the data, supervised the study, and wrote the manuscript. TO analyzed the data. MS and KN collected MRI data. TN collected clinical data. YT collected clinical data and supervised the study. HK analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, and the internal review board of the Osaka International Cancer Institute approved the clinical data used in this research (Approval number: 1707109126). The local institution waivered obtaining written informed consent from the patients due to the study's retrospective and non-invasive nature.

 Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

 Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 References MaherEAMietzJArteagaCLDePinhoRAMohlaSBrain metastasis: Opportunities in basic and translational researchCancer Res696015602020091963859310.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4347 DarlixALouvelGFraisseJJacotWBrainEDebledMMouret-ReynierMAGoncalvesADalencFDelalogeSImpact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohortBr J Cancer121991100020193171968410.1038/s41416-019-0619-y KimYJKimJSKimIAMolecular subtype predicts incidence and prognosis of brain metastasis from breast cancer in SEER databaseJ Cancer Res Clin1441803181620182997153110.1007/s00432-018-2697-2 NagaoEYoshiuraTHiwatashiAObaraMYamashitaKKamanoHTakayamaYKobayashiKHondaH3D turbo spin-echo sequence with motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation for detection of brain metastases on 3T MR imagingAJNR Am J Neuroradiol3266467020112129279710.3174/ajnr.A2343 LinNUWinerEPBrain metastases: The HER2 paradigmClin Cancer Res131648165520071736351710.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2478 ChasonJLWalkerFBLandersJWMetastatic carcinoma in the central nervous system and dorsal root ganglia. A prospective autopsy studyCancer1678178719631402031410.1002/1097-0142(196306)16:6<781::aid-cncr2820160614>3.0.co;2-m DelattreJYKrolGThalerHTPosnerJBDistribution of brain metastasesArch Neurol457417441988339002910.1001/archneur.1988.00520310047016 TakanoKKinoshitaMTakagakiMSakaiMTateishiSAchihaTHirayamaRNishioKUchidaJKumagaiTDifferent spatial distributions of brain metastases from lung cancer by histological subtype and mutation status of epidermal growth factor receptorNeuro Oncol1871672420162651973910.1093/neuonc/nov266 MeyerPCReahTGSecondary Neoplasms of the central nervous system and meningesBr J Cancer743844819531312638610.1038/bjc.1953.44 EllingsonBMCloughesyTFPopeWBZawTMPhillipsHLalezariSNghiemphuPLIbranimHNaeiniKMHarrisRJLaiAAnatomic localization of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylated and unmethylated tumors: A radiographic study in 358 de novo human glioblastomasNeuroimage5990891620122200116310.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.076 KinoshitaMSasayamaTNaritaYYamashitaFKawaguchiAChibaYKagawaNTanakaKKohmuraEAritaHDifferent spatial distribution between germinal center B and non-germinal center B primary central nervous system lymphoma revealed by magnetic resonance group analysisNeuro Oncol1672873420142449740610.1093/neuonc/not319 MazziottaJTogaAEvansAFowPLancasterJZillesKWoodsRPausTSimpsonGPikeBA probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM)Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci3561293132220011154570410.1098/rstb.2001.0915 BenderETToméWADistribution of brain metastases: Implications for non-uniform dose prescriptionsBr J Radiol8464965820112169741310.1259/bjr/30173406 QuattrocchiCCErranteYGaudinoCMallioCAGionaASantiniDToniniGZobelBBSpatial brain distribution of intra-axial metastatic lesions in breast and lung cancer patientsJ Neurooncol110798720122280202010.1007/s11060-012-0937-x BlowsFMDriverKESchmidtMKBroeksAvan LeeuwenFEWesselingJCheangMCGelmonKNielsenTOBlomqvistCSubtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: A collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studiesPLoS Med7e100027920102052080010.1371/journal.pmed.1000279 WeigeltBBaehnerFLReis-FilhoJSThe contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: A retrospective of the last decadeJ Pathol22026328020101992729810.1002/path.2648 GabosZSinhaRHansonJChauhanNHughJMackeyJRAbdulkarimBPrognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor positivity for the development of brain metastasis after newly diagnosed breast cancerJ Clin Oncol245658566320061710206610.1200/JCO.2006.07.0250 NamBHKimSYHanHSKwonYLeeKSKimTHRoJBreast cancer subtypes and survival in patients with brain metastasesBreast Cancer Res10R2020081830776310.1186/bcr1870 ThamYLSextonKKramerRHilsenbeckSElledgeRPrimary breast cancer phenotypes associated with propensity for central nervous system metastasesCancer10769670420061682657910.1002/cncr.22041 PakneshanSSafarpourDTavassoliFJabbariBBrain metastasis from ovarian cancer: A systematic reviewJ Neurooncol1191620142478925310.1007/s11060-014-1447-9 KyeongSChaYJAhnSGSuhSHSonEJAhnSJSubtypes of breast cancer show different spatial distributions of brain metastasesPLoS One12e018854220172915587910.1371/journal.pone.0188542 Tzourio-MazoyerNLandeauBPapathanassiouDCrivelloFEtardODelcroixNMazoyerBJoliotMAutomated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brainNeuroimage1527328920021177199510.1006/nimg.2001.0978 GuoYArcieroCAJiangRBeheraMPengLLiXDifferent breast cancer subtypes show different metastatic patterns: A study from a large public databaseAsian Pac J Cancer Prev213587359320203336945610.31557/APJCP.2020.21.12.3587 SchroederTBittrichPKuhneJFNoebelCLeischnerHFiehlerJSchroederJSchoenGGellißenSMapping distribution of brain metastases: Does the primary tumor matter?J Neurooncol14722923520203206534510.1007/s11060-020-03419-6 PagetSThe distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast 1889Cancer Metastasis Rev89810119892673568 MorganAJGiannoudisAPalmieriCThe genomic landscape of breast cancer brain metastases: A systematic reviewLancet Oncol22e7e1720213338751110.1016/S1470-2045(20)30556-8 SmidMWangYZhangYSieuwertsAMYuJKlijnJGFoekensJAMartensJWSubtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapseCancer Res683108311420081845113510.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5644 KomorowskiASWarnerEMacKayHJSahgalAPritchardKIJerzakKJIncidence of brain metastases in non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer: Is there a role for screening?Clin Breast Cancer20e54e6420203144728610.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.007 Gil-GilMJMartinez-GarciaMSierraAConesaGDel BarcoSGonzález-JimenezSVillàSBreast cancer brain metastases: A review of the literature and a current multidisciplinary management guidelineClin Transl Oncol1643644620142427757210.1007/s12094-013-1110-5 TakahashiHIsogawaMManagement of breast cancer brain metastasesChin Clin Oncol73020183005673210.21037/cco.2018.05.06 GandhiAKSharmaDNRathGKProphylactic cranial irradiation in breast cancer: A new way forwardIndian J Medical Paediatr Oncol36777820152615728110.4103/0971-5851.158822 HashemTEldinKKMetwalyHElkholyEProphylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in high-risk breast cancer patients: Preliminary dataJ Clin Oncol26115012008

Schematic illustration of flow of image analysis. Each patient's brain MRI or CT was deformed and registered to standard brain MRI (MNI152) using FMRIB software library/FMRIB linear image registration tool. The lesions were manually identified. Thereafter, the center of gravity of the lesion was calculated automatically for each lesion, and voxel was defined as the primary site of occurrence.

Axial image of the frequency map of all brain metastases from breast cancer. Note that the lesions are mostly concentrated in the cerebellum.

Upper dotted line indicates 1.96 of adjusted residual and lower dotted line -1.96. The plotted points beyond the upper line or below the lower line indicate statistical significance (P<0.05).

The proportion of symptoms at the time of brain imaging. There was no statistical significance.

Patient characteristics.

Characteristic All Luminal A Luminal B HER2 TNBC P-value
Patients (n) 67 28 9 14 16 -
Female (n) 67 28 9 14 16 -
Age at diagnosis           0.59
     Median (years) 56 57.5 59 52.5 56.5  
     IQR (44.5-65.5) (43.3-67.3) (51.0-64.0) (38.3-61.0) (48.0-70.3)  
Interval time from initial diagnosisto BMs           0.17
     Median (months) 46 70 24 33 47  
     IQR (23.0-93.0) (28.8-112.3) (23.0-57.0) (18.5-59.8) (29.5-68.8)  
Total number of BMs (n) 437 162 30 196 49 -
Number of BMs, n, median (IQR)           0.26
     Median (n) 2 3.5 1 2 2  
     IQR (1-5.3) (1.8-6.0) (1.0-4.0) (1.0-11.0) (1.0-3.3)  
Patients with multiple BMs, n (%) 43(64) 21(75) 6(33) 9(64) 10(63) 0.81

HER2, human epidermal receptor 2; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; BMs, brain metastases; IQR, interquartile range.

Distribution of brain metastases.

Location All n=437 (%) LuminalA n=162 (%) LuminalB n=30 (%) HER2 n=196 (%) TNBC n=49 (%)
Frontal lobe 107 (24.5) 33 (20.4) 3 (10.0) 55 (28.1) 16 (32.7)
Parietal lobe 69 (15.8) 27 (16.7) 4 (13.3) 32 (16.3) 6 (12.2)
Occipital lobe 44 (10.1) 17 (10.5) 1 (3.3) 19 (9.7) 7 (14.3)
Temporal lobe 38 (8.7) 13 (8.0) 2 (6.7) 17 (8.7) 6 (12.2)
Putamen 18 (4.1) 4 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 14 (7.1) 0 (0.0)
Caudate 6 (1.4) 2 (1.2) 1 (3.3) 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0)
Thalamus 5 (1.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 5 (2.6) 0 (0.0)
Brain stem 4 (0.9) 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0)
Cerebellum 143 (32.7) 64 (39.5) 18 (60.0) 48 (24.5) 13 (26.5)
Pineal body 2 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (3.3) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.0)
Pituitary gland 1 (0.2) 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

HER2, human epidermal receptor 2; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.