All cell lines, including HeLa (cat. no. TCHu187), hFOB 1.19 (cat. no. GNHu14), HOS (cat. no. TCHu167), and U2OS (cat. no. SCSP-5030) were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Typical Culture Preservation Committee of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [National Center of Authenticated Cell Cultures (NCACC)]. KHOS-240S (cat. no. CRL-1545) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. These cells were routinely cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone; Cytiva) and supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (HyClone; Cytiva) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All the cells were cultured in 5% CO₂ at 37°C. Protein expression and reconstitution experiments were conducted using the established stable cell lines. All cell lines were routinely tested for mycoplasma infection and confirmed to be negative.

Primer pairs used for hot fusion were designed using CE Design V1.04 (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.). Each primer comprised a fragment of a gene-specific sequence and a 17-30 bp sequence of the pIRES-hrGFP-1a vector (forward primer, agc ccg ggc gga tcc gaa ttc ATG TCG AAG CCC CAT AGT GAA G and reverse primer, gtc atc ctt gta gtc ctc gag CGG CAC AGG AAC AAC ACG C). The pIRES-hrGFP-1a vector was digested with EcoRI and XhoI (New England BioLabs, Inc.) at 37°C for ~2-3 h. The enzyme-digested vector was then run on a 1.0% agarose gel and purified using a QIAGEN GmbH column kit (cat. no. 12123; QIAGEN GmbH) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was isolated from HeLa cells using TRIzol (cat. no. 15596-018; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Purified RNA was transcribed for cDNA using oligodT primers. The insert fragment was then synthesized by PCR amplification. A linearized vector digested by EcoRI and XhoI and the PCR insert were added to a PCR microtube for ligation with ClonExpress^® II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.). Plasmids were introduced into the Escherichia coli strain (cat. no. EC11303; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) by chemical transformation. A total of 5×10⁵ cells were plated onto LB agar plates containing 1 µl/ml ampicillin (cat. no. A6920; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), and incubated overnight at 37°C. Colonies were screened by colony PCR (28 cycles) using universal primers (located on the backbone vector). The insert sequence was verified by Sanger sequencing. GAPDH was used as the control gene to assess the effects of PKM2 or SREBP2 overexpression via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and western blotting. Comparisons were performed using the paired Student's t-test using GraphPad Prism software v9.2.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

To stably knockdown lncCCAT1 or PKM2, specific shRNAs as well as corresponding controls (sh-NC) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. The shRNA sequences were then were subcloned into pSUPER vectors (OligoEngine) as previously described (20). For stable transfection, OS cells reaching 80% confluency were transfected with pSUPER plasmids containing indicated shRNAs (2.5 µg/ml) by the use of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 25°C for 15 min, followed by treatment with 600 µg/ml G418 (1 mg/ml; Stratagene; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the stably transfected cells were selected from the remaining colonies. The selected cells were further kept for two weeks before following application. The transfection efficiency was verified using RT-qPCR. The sequences of shRNAs used are provided in Table SI.

HeLa cells (5×10⁶) were first lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (1X PBS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and 0.5% NP40) with RNase inhibitor (Takara Bio, Inc.) and a protease inhibitor (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) on ice for 5 min. The mixture was then vigorously vibrated and centrifuged at 13,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant was incubated with DynaBeads protein A/G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) conjugated with anti-FLAG antibody (MDL no. MFCD02262912) or normal IgG (MDL no. MFCD00212351; both from Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at 4°C overnight. The beads were washed with low-salt wash buffer, high-salt wash buffer, and 1X PNK buffer (product no. SAB4200134; Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The beads were resuspended in elution buffer and then divided into two groups, one for RNA isolation from PKM2-RNA complexes and the other for the western blotting assay for PKM2.

Cells were cross-linked on ice with UV irradiation type C (254 nm) at 400 mJ per cm² in the presence of cold PBS (4 ml per 15-cm dish). Cells were scraped off and pelleted at 1,000 × g at 4°C and stored at -80°C until further use. Cells lysis was performed in cold wash buffer (1X PBS, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% NP-40 and 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) supplemented with a 200 U/ml RNase inhibitor (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics) and incubated on ice for 30 min. The clear cells were lysed by centrifugation at 13,200 × g for 10 min at 4°C followed by the addition of RQ I (1 U/µl; Promega Corporation) to a final concentration of 1 U/µl and incubation in a water bath for 3 min at 37°C. A cooling reaction was subsequently performed for 5 min on ice before proceeding, and the reaction was terminated with the addition of EDTA. For immunoprecipitation, the supernatant was incubated overnight at 4°C with 10 µg Flag-antibody and control IgG-antibody. The immunoprecipitation was further incubated with protein A/G Dynabeads for 2 h at 4°C. After applying a magnet and removing the supernatants, the beads were sequentially washed with lysis buffer, high-salt buffer (250 mM Tris 7.4, 750 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% NP-40 and 0.5 deoxycholate), and PNK buffer (50 mM Tris, 20 mM EGTA and 0.5% NP-40) two times, respectively. The beads were resuspended in Elution buffer (50 nM Tris 8.0, 10 mM EDTA and 1% SDS), and the suspension was incubated for 20 min in a heat block at 70°C to release the immunoprecipitated RBP with crosslinked RNA and vortex. The magnetic beads were removed on the separator. The supernatant was transferred to a clean 1.5-ml microfuge tube. Proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics) was added into the 1% input (without immunoprecipitated) and immunoprecipitated RBP with crosslinked RNA, with a final concentration of 1.2 mg/ml and incubated for 120 min at 55°C. The RNA was purified with TRIzol reagent. The Illumina ScriptSeq™ v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit (Epicentre; Illumina Inc.) was used for the cDNA libraries. The cDNAs were purified and amplified; PCR products corresponding to 200-500 bps were purified, quantified and stored at −80°C until used for sequencing. PKM2-bound RNAs were isolated by IP of anti-FLAG using TRIzol. cDNA libraries were prepared with the KAPA RNA Hyper Prep Kit (kit code KK8541; KAPA Biosystems, Inc.; Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality of samples was identified by FastQC v0.11.6 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), and high-throughput sequencing of the cDNA libraries was performed on the Illumina X10 platform (Illumina, Inc.) for 150 bp paired-end sequencing. The series record GSE184327 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE184327) provides access to all of our data and is the accession no. that should be quoted in any manuscript referring to the data. For high-throughput sequencing, the libraries were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions and applied to an Illumina Nextseq500 system for 150 nt paired-end sequencing by ABlife (Wuhan), Inc.

Total RNA was isolated from the cells using the E.Z.N.A^® Total RNA Kit I R6834 (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc.), and the RNA was measured using NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Purified RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA (25°C, 5 min; 42°C, 1 h; and 70°C, 5 min) using the HiScript III RT SuperMix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.). RT-qPCR (95°C for 5 min and 30 cycles at 95°C for 10 sec, 57°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec, and finally 72°C for 10 min) was then performed using the Step One system (Applied Biosystems™; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and AceQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.). Gene expression was calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCq method (21) and normalized to the reference gene GAPDH. Primer sequences are presented in Table SI.

After reads were aligned onto the genome, only uniquely mapped reads were used for subsequent analysis. The ABLIRC strategy was used to identify the binding regions of PKM2 on the genome (22). Reads with an overlap of at least 1 bp were clustered as peaks. For each gene, a computational simulation was used to randomly generate reads with the same number and length as the reads in the peaks. The output reads were further mapped to the same genes to generate a random maximum peak height from the overlapping reads. The entire process was repeated 500 times. All the observed peaks with heights higher than those of the random max peaks (P<0.05) were selected. The IP and input samples were independently analyzed by the simulation, and the IP peaks that overlapped with the input peaks were removed. The target genes of IP were finally determined by the peaks, and the binding motifs of the IP protein were revealed using the HOMER software (http://bio.informatics.iupui.edu/homer). The fuzznuc software (EMBOSS; http://embossgui.sourceforge.net/demo/fuzznuc.html) was used to obtain the specific positions of the two motifs on lncRNANEAT1, lncRNAPVT1, and lncCCAT1 combined with the peak.

To sort out functional categories of peak-associated genes (target genes), Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were identified using KOBAS 2.0 (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn) (23). The hypergeometric test and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate control procedure were used to define the enrichment of each term.

The sample of cells was resuspended in 40 liters elution buffer [50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and 1% SDS], and incubated at 70°C for 20 min with shaking (13,200 × g). The sample was then pulse-centrifuged at 13,200 × g and the supernatant was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube placed on a magnetic separator. The complexed samples were eluted after boiling in water with 1X SDS buffer for 10 min. The protein concentration was evaluated using BCA Pierce Protein Assay Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc.; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Subsequently, 20 µg of proteins was loaded and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by transferring to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Roche Diagnostics). TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween-20) containing 5% non-fat milk powder was used for incubating the membranes for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were then processed with primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, and then with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (product code ab288151; 1:10,000; Abcam) at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (EMD Millipore) and quantified via the ImageJ2X version 1.8.0 software (National Institutes of Health). The primary antibodies were as follow: PKM2 (product code ab85555; 1:500), hexokinase 2 (HK2; product code ab209847; 1:1,000), 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase-3 (PFKFB3; product code ab181861; 1:2,000), lactate dehydrogenase (LDHA; product code ab52488; 1:10,000); pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1; product code ab202468; 1:2,000; all from Abcam), p-PKM2^S37 (cat. no. 11456; 1:1,000; Signalway Antibody LLC), Cdc25A (cat. no. 21145; 1:1,000; Signalway Antibody LLC), acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase 1 (ACC1; product code ab45174; 1:2,000; Abcam), ATP citrate lyase (ACLY; product code ab40793; 1:10,000; Abcam), fatty acyl-CoA elongase 6 (ELOVL6; cat. no. 24672; 1:500; Signalway Antibody LLC), fatty acid synthase (FASN; product code ab128870; 1:10,000; Abcam), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1; product no. 2794; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), stearoyl-CoA desaturase 5 (SCD5; cat. no. 27911; 1:2,000; Signalway Antibody LLC), SREBP2 (product code ab30682; 1:1,000), α-Actinin (product code ab68194; 1:1,000), and Histone-H3 (product code ab1791, 1:5,000; all from Abcam).

HOS and U2OS cells grown on slides were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 72°C. Following treatment with the protease reagent, the slides were incubated with pre-hybridization buffer at 40°C for 4 h, and then hybridized overnight with a digoxin-labeled probe at 40°C. After washing by PBS, the slides were incubated with a HRP-conjugated anti-digoxin antibody (cat. no. NEF832001EA; PerkinElmer, Inc.). The slides were then incubated with SABC-FITC at 37°C for 30 min after washing, followed by processing with 0.2 µmol/l 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (cat. no. D9542; Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA) containing antifade mounting solution. The images were obtained under a fluorescence microscope (Leica, SP8 laser confocal microscope). The lncCCAT1 FISH probe sequence is presented in Table SI.

Cell viability was measured using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Sigma Aldrich; Merck KGaA) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. According to the experimental grouping design, 2,000 HOS and U2OS cells were seeded in each of the 96 wells of the plates overnight at 37°C, and then further cultured for 0, 24 48, or 72 h. CCK-8 solution (10 µl; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) was then added, and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a SpectraMax microtitration plate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC).

EdU staining was performed according to the instructions of the EdU kit (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.). In short, 4×10³ HOS and U2OS cells were cultured in DMEM containing EdU for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 30 min. After staining with DAPI for 10 min at 37°C, EdU-positive cells were observed and counted under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation).

A total of 800 HOS and U2OS cells were seeded into 12-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 2 weeks. OS cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 37°C for 60 min and stained with 2% crystal violet at 37°C for 20 min. Colonies with >50 cells were counted. Images were obtained using a camera (Nikon Corporation).

The glucose uptake capacity of HOS and U2OS cells was measured using a glucose assay kit (cat. no. N13195; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First, cells were seeded in 96-well plates (5×10⁴ cells/well) and cultured in DMEM without glucose. The cells were then rinsed with PBS and incubated with 2-NBDG at 37°C for 30 min. When the cells were rewashed with HBSS, the fluorescence intensity of the cells was detected.

The L-Lactate Assay Kit (cat. no. 700510; Cayman Chemical Company) was used to assess both the intracellular and extracellular lactate content of HOS and U2OS cells. OS cells (5×10⁴) were first cultured at 4°C in DMEM basic medium containing 10% FBS and then in DMEM basic medium containing 0.5% FBS for 4 h. After collecting the cells, the lactate content was measured according to the manufacturer's instructions.

According to the manufacturer instructions (Seahorse Bioscience, Inc.; Agilent Technologies, Inc.), the ECAR and OCR of HOS and U2OS cells were measured in a 96-well plate (5×10⁴ cells/well) using Seahorse XF Analyzers. One day prior to the experiment, the cells were placed on cell culture microplates. When ECAR was measured, 10 mM glucose, 1 µM oligomycin, and 100 mM 2-deoxyglucose were added first. When OCR was detected, 1 µM oligomycin, 1 µM FCCP, and 1 µM rotenone were added to the microplates. The ECAR and OCR values were calculated according to methods reported in the literature (24).

According to the experimental methods reported in the literature (25), HOS and U2OS cells (1×10⁵ cells/well) were cultured in 6-well plates for 48 h and then in glucose-free medium. The cells were extracted with an extraction buffer, and the supernatant containing NADPH/NADP⁺ was extracted after centrifugation (10,000 × g at 37°C for 10 min). The supernatant was heated at 60°C for 30 min to decompose NADP⁺, then cooled on ice, and quickly spun to remove the sediment. Part of the supernatant was reacted with NADP⁺ circulation buffer and enzyme mixture for 5 min at room temperature to convert NADP⁺ to NADPH. OS cells were analyzed using the NADPH assay kit (product code ab65349; Abcam) according to the manufacturer's instructions and the NADP⁺/NADPH quantification kit (cat. no. S0179; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Complex I, also known as NADH dehydrogenase, catalyzes the dehydrogenation of NADH to NAD⁺. The activity of this enzyme was calculated by measuring the oxidation rate of NADH at 340 nm. According to the operation method reported in the literature (26), NAD⁺ was detected using the Micro Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Complex I Activity Assay Kit (cat. no. BC0515; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

GSH levels were determined using the GSH-Glo™ assay (cat. no. V6912, Promega Corporation). Fluorescein derivatives were converted to fluorescein in the presence of GSH. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the cells were incubated with 2.1 mM GSH-Glo™ reagent for 30 min at 25°C. Luminescence was detected using a BioTek Synergy H1 Hybrid plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc.).

HOS and U2OS cells were inoculated onto 96-well plates at ~8,000 cells/well, after interference with lncCCAT1, following the manufacturer's instructions to carry out the experiment (ATPlite; PerkinElmer, Inc.). The BMG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) reader was used to screen all the plates to obtain the luminescence signal, and the ATP concentration was normalized to the protein concentration.

HOS and U2OS cells were incubated with L-arginine (cat. no. A0013; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) and glucose-free F-12K (cat. no. 21127022, Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) medium for 30 min at 37°C and then incubated with 7 mM L-glucose (cat. no. 20829; Cayman Chemical Company), 1 mM L-arginine, or 1 mM D-arginine (cat. no. A769515; Toronto Research Chemicals) for another 30 min at 37°C. Cell lysates were then collected and glucose 6-phosphate content was determined using a Glucose-6-Phosphate Fluorometric Assay kit (cat. no. 700750-96 wells; Cayman Chemical Company). Finally, the concentration of glucose 6-phosphate in cells was determined according to the methods reported in the literature (27).

The production of 3-PG was determined according to the methods reported in the literature (28). The reaction buffer consisted of 200 mM HEPES, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM Na₂HPO₄, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 5 mM MgCl₂ at pH 7.4. Subsequently, 50 µl supernatant, 2 mM ATP, 0.1 mM NADH, 1 U/ml PGK, and 1 U/ml GAPDH were added to the reaction buffer.

According to the literature (29), the association between lncCCAT1 and PKM2 was determined using the Magna RIP RBP IP kit (cat. no. 17-700; Millipore; Merck KGaA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PKM2 antibodies (cat. no. 11456; 1:1,000; Signalway Antibody LLC) were used for the RIP assay at 4°C overnight with gentle rotation and co-precipitated RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and evaluated by RT-qPCR.

A DNA fragment containing the full-length lncCCAT1 sequence or a negative control sequence was PCR-amplified using T7 RNA polymerase (cat. no. 10881767001; Roche Diagnostics). The lncCCAT1 was labeled with biotin and the biotinylated RNA was incubated with cell lysate overnight. Then, streptavidin magnetic beads (cat. no. 072001; IPHASE) were added and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. The products were treated with RNase-free DNase I (Roche Diagnostics) and purified with an RNeasy Mini Kit (cat. no. DXT-74134, Qiagen, Inc.), with the resulting RNA used for RT-qPCR assays.

Co-IP was performed as reported previously (29), and western blotting analysis was performed on input samples and IP samples. Co-IP verified the effect of lncCCAT1 on the interaction between Cdc25A and PKM2 using PhosphoSitePlus (https://www.phosphosite.org/homeAction) and NetPhos-3.1 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetPhos-3.1). To further demonstrate that PKM2 acted as a phosphokinase at T610 of SREBP2, PKM2 in the cell line 293T (cat. no. SCSP-502; NCACC) was overexpressed. The phosphorylation of PKM2 at T610 of SREBP2 was demonstrated by adding the 0.5 mM PKM2 phosphorylation substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP; product code ab34793; Abcam) at 30°C for 3 h.

The codon-optimized sequence of PKM2 was cloned into the expression GEX-4T-1 vector (EcoRI/XhoI, GE Healthcare; Cytiva). Approximately 100 µg of GST and GST-PKM2 fusion protein were immobilized in 50 µl of GSH agarose and equilibrated before incubation at 4°C for 1 h to capture the GST fusion proteins. Then, 1 µg GST-core fusion protein was added and incubated at 4°C overnight. After washing with a cracking buffer solution (cat. no. P001; Caisson Labs, Inc.) four times at room temperature for 5 min, the proteins were eluted in Laemmli buffer and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE at 95°C for 15 min (cat. no. S1051-100; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.).

According to a previous study (30), OS cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer, and then proteins were diluted with NET-gelatin buffer. Subsequently, the samples were incubated with anti-bodies. After incubation with agarose-A/G (cat. no. sc-2001; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) on a 40°C shaker overnight, the precipitates were collected and washed. After adding 2X loading buffer, thermal denaturation was performed, and the proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE at 95°C for 15 min.

OS cells were inoculated in 12-well plates (5×10⁴ cells/well) following the methods reported in the literature (31). After 24 h, the cells were placed in FBS-free medium containing glucose and glutamine, and then incubated with ¹⁴C-glucose for 2 h at 37°C. After washing OS cells with PBS, lipids were extracted with hexane/isopropanol at room temperature. Finally, the lipids were dissolved in chloroform and determined using a scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).

As previously reported in the literature (32), OS cells were cultured in 6-well plates (1×10⁵ cells/well), then LPDS, β-methylcyclodextrin, and ¹³C₂-sodium acetate were added and cultured for 24 h at 37°C. The cells were washed with ice-cold PBS followed by 0.9% NaCl, and ice-cold methanol was added. The cells were collected, centrifuged, and methanol was added. The analysis was performed using an ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

The procedures were approved (approval no. S2019009) by the Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animals of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China). The animals were handled in strict compliance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals of the American Physiological Society (33).

The in vivo study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animals of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China). In brief, 5×10⁶ HOS cells transfected with sh-lncCCAT1 or sh-NC (control) were suspended in 200 µl PBS and injected subcutaneously into the backs of 8-week-old BALB/C nude female mice (mean weight, 23 g; Laboratory Animal Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China). A total 6 mice (n=3/group) were involved in this experiment. No animals succumbed during this experiment. Each mouse was housed in a separate cage in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) laboratory (temperature, 28°C; humidity, 50%; light/dark cycle, 10/14 h cycle), with free access to food and water. Animal health and behavior were monitored 3 times a week. The tumor size was measured with a caliper at 7, 10, 14, 17, 21, 24 and 28 days after inoculation (while the corresponding curves were drawn from the results tested at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days), and the volume was determined according to the formula of length × width² × 1/2. When the tumor volume reached 1,000 mm³, the mice were euthanized via cervical dislocation. Mice were considered sacrificed when they had no response to stimulation via tweezers. Subsequently, the tumors were collected and weighed.

IHC was performed as described in the literature (34). Tumors obtained from in vivo assays were paraffin-embedded and cut into 4-µm thick slices, followed by transferring to glass slides. After deparaffinization and hydration, the slides were placed in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and heated in a microwave oven (high fire mode, 5 min) to retrieve antigen. Following cooling at 25°C and endogenous peroxidase removal via 3% H₂O₂ (10 min), sections were stained overnight at 4°C with HK-2 (product code ab209847; 1:500; Abcam;), LDHA (product code ab52488; 1:2,000; Abcam), FASN (product code ab128870; 1:450; Abcam), and SCD1 (cat. no. 2794S; 1:400; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.). After processing with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (product code ab97080; 1:2,000; Abcam) at 4°C overnight, the sections were rinsed three times using TBST with 0.1% Tween-20 for 5 min, visualized via 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 5 min at room temperature, and counterstained using hematoxylin for 1 min at room temperature. Scans were performed using an Aperio scanoscope (Leica Biosystems) and analyzed using the Aperio Imagescope software v6.0 (Leica Biosystems).

Three independent experiments were performed, and data from three repeated experiments were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 (IBM Corp.). Student's t-test was used for the comparison between two groups. For comparisons between three or more groups, one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Dunnett's or Tukey's multiple comparison test. For comparison between two or more variables, two-way ANOVA was applied. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

As revealed in Fig. S1A and B, RT-qPCR and western blotting verified PKM2 overexpression in HeLa cells, a most popular cancer cell model widely used in the study of molecular function and mechanism. Western blotting results revealed successful IP of PKM2 in HeLa cells (Fig. S1C). The hierarchically clustered Pearson correlation matrix was obtained by comparing the transcript expression values for the input and PKM2 IP samples (Fig. S1D). The scatter plot of read abundance across the reference genome in paired samples showed an enriched preference for PKM2 IP samples (Fig. S1E). The enriched reads were distributed across the reference genome (Fig. S1F).

The peak distribution across the reference genome is presented in Fig. S2A, and the Venn diagram revealed the overlapped peaks in two replicate iRIP-seq samples (Fig. S2B). The HOMER software was used for motif analysis of the top ten preferred bound motifs of PKM2 (Fig. S2C). The top ten enriched GO biological processes and KEGG pathways of the PKM2-bound genes are presented in Fig. S2D.

The peak sequence of bound lncRNAs in the overlap peak was used, and then HOMER was used to identify motifs on these sequences. After the motif comparison of the two results, it was determined that the two motifs AGAGAGA and UGGGU appeared relatively consistent, and thus the fuzznuc software was used to obtain the specific positions of the two motifs on lncRNANEAT1, lncRNAPVT1, and lncCCAT1 combined with the peak. The number of mRNAs, lncRNAs, small RNAS (sRNAs), and other types of RNAs bound by PKM2 in our iRIP-seq data were also obtained (Fig. 1A). The enriched abundance of RNAs bound by PKM2 in the IP sample and three PKM2-bound lncRNAs (PVT1, CCAT1, and NEAT1) are highlighted (Fig. 1B). Motif presentation revealed motif searching results for PKM2-bound lncRNAs and three specific PKM2-bound lncRNAs (Fig. 1C). The read density plot revealed the binding density distribution and motif regions of these three lncRNAs (Fig. 1D).

RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of lncCCAT1 in human normal osteoblasts (HFOB 1.19) and OS cells (HOS, KHOS-240S, and U2OS). The results revealed that lncCCAT1 was highly expressed in OS cells, especially in the HOS and U2OS cell lines, for which subsequent experiments were conducted (Fig. 2A). The distribution of lncCCAT1 in HOS and U2OS cells after FISH was detected by fluorescence microscopy, and the results showed that lncCCAT1 was distributed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 2B), consistent with a previous study (35). The lncCCAT1 interference vector was constructed, and the interference groups with the optimal interference effect were selected for subsequent experiments (Fig. S3A). The CCK-8 assay revealed that the proliferation of HOS and U2OS cells was reduced after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 2C), and the decreased number of positive cells in OS cells was detected by EdU (Fig. 2D). The clonal formation assay revealed that interference with lncCCAT1 reduced the number of OS cell clones (Fig. 2E).

Following interference with lncCCAT1, the amounts of glucose and lactic acid in the culture medium of HOS and U2OS cells were decreased (Fig. 3A and B). After detecting interference with lncCCAT1 with Seahorse XF Extracellular Flux Analyzers, the ECAR of HOS and U2OS cells was decreased (Figs. 3C and S4A), the OCR was increased (Figs. 3D and S4B), and the relative glycolysis rate (ECAR/OCR) was decreased (Fig. 3E). The results of the NAPDH/NAPD⁺ assay revealed that the level of NAPDH/NAPD⁺ in OS cells decreased after interference with lncCCAT1 (Figs. 3F and S4C). The GSH GSH-Glo™ assay revealed that intracellular GSH levels decreased after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 3G). Following interference with lncCCAT1, the levels of ATP (Fig. 3H) were increased, and the levels of glucose 6-phosphate (Fig. 3I), and 3-PG (Fig. 3J) in HOS and U2OS cells were decreased.

First, the binding effect of lncCCAT1 and PKM2 was verified. LncCCAT1 was enriched in PKM2 precipitation in HOS and U2OS cells, and the binding effect of lncCCAT1 and PKM2 was verified by the RIP assay (Fig. S5A). The binding effect of lncCCAT1 and PKM2 was verified by the RNA pulldown assay, and the results showed that lncCCAT1 could pulldown PKM2 (Fig. S5B). To investigate the regulation of lncCCAT1 on OS cell proliferation through PKM2, an interference vector of PKM2 (Fig. S3B) and an overexpression vector of lncCCAT1 were constructed (Fig. S3C) which were used in a rescue experiment. Overexpression of lncCCAT1 promoted the proliferation of OS cells, and after the interference with PKM2, reduced proliferation of OS cells as detected by CCK-8 (Fig. S5C), a reduced number of positive cells in OS cells as detected by EdU (Fig. S5D), and decreased OS cell clones as detected by the clonal formation assay (Fig. S5E) were revealed.

The glucose assay kit was used to detect the glucose content in the culture medium of HOS and U2OS cells under different treatment conditions, and the results revealed that after overexpression of lnCCCAT1, the glucose content in cells increased; then, after interference with PKM2, glucose (Fig. S6A) and lactic acid (Fig. S6B) in the cells decreased. After overexpression of lncCCAT1, the Seahorse XF Extracellular Flux Analyzer detected that the ECAR was increased (Fig. S6C), the OCR was decreased (Fig. S6D), and therefore the ECAR/OCR was increased (Fig. S6E). On this basis, PKM2 was disrupted, and it was revealed that ECAR was decreased (Fig. S6C), the OCR was increased (Fig. S6D), and therefore the ECAR/OCR was decreased (Fig. S6E). Following overexpression of lncCCAT1, intra-cellular levels of NAPDH/NAPD⁺ (Fig. S6F) and GSH (Fig. S6G) were increased, the intracellular levels of ATP were decreased (Fig. S6H), and the intracellular levels of glucose 6-phosphate (Fig. S6I) and 3-PG were increased (Fig. S6J). Following the aforementioned treatment, PKM2 was disrupted again, and the results revealed that the intra-cellular levels of NAPDH/NAPD⁺ (Fig. S6F and K) and GSH (Fig. S6G) were decreased, the intracellular levels of ATP were increased (Fig. S6H), and the intracellular levels of glucose 6-phosphate (Fig. S6I) and 3-PG were decreased (Fig. S6J).

The effect of lncCCAT1 on PKM2 nuclear localization in HOS and U2OS cells was observed by fluorescence microscopy. The results revealed that lncCCAT1 promoted the expression of PKM2 in the nucleus, however this expression was decreased after the interference of lncCCAT1 (Fig. 4A). Western blotting results revealed that the expression of PKM2 in the nucleus decreased after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 4B), and studies have shown that nuclear PKM2 promotes the transcriptional activity of the myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYC) and thus, promotes glycolysis (36,37). Therefore, the transcriptional activity of MYC was examined. The transcription activity kit detected a decrease in MYC transcription activity after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 4C), and the expression of the MYC-related genes were reduced (Fig. 4D). These results indicated that lncCCAT1 promoted the expression of PKM2 in the nucleus, activated the transcription activity of MYC, and promoted glycolysis.

Next, how lncCCAT1 regulates PKM2 nuclear translocation was explored. In HOS and U2OS cells, western blotting detected the expression of PKM2 and p-PKM2 after interference with lncCCAT1. The results revealed that lncCCAT1 could inhibit the phosphorylation of serine 37 in PKM2, suggesting that lncCCAT1 could recruit some phosphatases to act on PKM2 (Fig. 4E). Phosphatase Cdc25A has been reported to act on PKM2 in the nucleus (38). In HOS and U2OS cells, lncCCAT1 in the nucleus and cytoplasm were biotinized by RNA pulldown, and Cdc25A expression was detected by western blotting. The results showed that lncCCAT1 in the nucleus could be pulled down to Cdc25A after biotinization (Fig. 4F). Following the RIP assay, RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of lncCCAT1, and the results confirmed that lncCCAT1 could recruit Cdc25A (Fig. 4G). Co-IP verified the effect of lncCCAT1 on the interaction between Cdc25A and PKM2, and the results revealed that lncCCAT1 promoted the interaction between Cdc25A and PKM2 when lncCCAT1 interfered (Fig. 4H). The aforementioned experimental results demonstrated that lncCCAT1 promoted the dephosphorylation of PKM2 in the nucleus by recruiting Cdc25A, thus promoting glycolysis.

In order to further explore whether PKM2 as an RBP of lncCCAT1, could play a role in lncCCAT1, it has been reported that RBP can stabilize RNA structure and lncCCAT1 plays a role in linking transcriptional complexes in the nucleus (39,40). Therefore, it was hypothesized that PKM2 could stabilize the structure of lncCCAT1. Following PKM2 interference, HOS and U2OS cells were treated with α-amanitin, and the expression levels of lncCCAT1 and GAPDH in the nucleus were detected by RT-qPCR. The results showed that PKM2 could stabilize lncCCAT1 (Fig. S7).

In HOS cells, the interaction protein of PKM2 was screened by GST pulldown combined mass spectrometry, and SREBP2 was revealed to interact with PKM2 (Fig. 5A). The Co-IP experiment also confirmed the interaction between SREBP2 and PKM2 (Fig. 5B). To predict the phosphorylation sites of SREBP2 on which PKM2 could act, an overexpression vector (pcDNA3.1) that inserted different fragments of SREBP2 was constructed; then, the GST pulldown assay was used to analyze the fragments that could bind to PKM2. Different overexpression vectors with GST tags were inserted into HOS cells, and the results of the GST pulldown experiment indicated that PKM2 may act on the phosphorylation sites of SREBP2 between 600 and 630 (Fig. 5C). A Co-IP assay was used to detect the effect of lncCCAT1 on the interaction between PKM2 and SREBP2, and the results revealed that interfering lncCCAT1 did not affect the interaction between PKM2 and SREBP2 (Fig. S8A). The PhosphoSitePlus and NetPhos-3.1 were used to predict the phosphorylation sites of SREBP2, and the two most likely phosphorylation sites in the range of 600-630 were T610 and S627 (Fig. S8B).

A stable cell line, HOS-SREBP2, overexpressing SREBP2 (Fig. S3D) was successfully constructed. In HOS-SREBP2 cells, IP-WB detected the effect of interference with PKM2 on the phosphorylation of SREBP2 in the nucleus; results showed that PKM2 affected phosphorylation at threonine (T) but not at serine. Therefore, the phosphorylation site of PKM2 on SREBP2 was identified as T610, and the molecular weight of SREBP2 protein was 123.72 kDa (Fig. 5D). A stable cell line HOS-SREBP2^T610M overexpressing the threonine mutant at site 610 of SREBP2 was constructed (Fig. S3E). In HOS-SREBP2 (wild-type, WT) and HOS-SREBP2^T610M (T610M) cells, the total protein content of SREBP2 was not affected by the T610 site, and the phosphorylation of SREBP2 T610 greatly affected protein expression in the nucleus (Fig. 5E). Further studies revealed that PKM2-mediated phosphorylation of T610 did not affect the protein synthesis of SREBP2 (Fig. 5F). Therefore, it was hypothesized that T610 affects the protein ubiquitination degradation process of SREBP2, rather than the synthesis process. IP-WB detected the ubiquitination of SREBP2 in the nucleus after PKM2 interference, indicating that PKM2-mediated phosphorylation of SREBP2 at T610 affected the stability of SREBP2 (Fig. 5G).

In 293T-PKM2 cells, the phosphorylation of SREBP2 serine site was detected after the GST pulldown assay. The results revealed that PKM2 could phosphorylate T620 of SREBP2 only in the presence of PEP (Fig. 5H). It has been reported that phosphorylation of PKM2 at lysine (K) 367 plays a decisive role in PKM2 phosphokinase activity (41). Therefore, the mutant vector PKM2^K367 was transferred into 293T cells to purify the PKM2-K^367M protein, and a GST pulldown test was performed to verify the interaction between PKM2 and SREBP2 in vitro. In HOS-SREBP2 (WT) and HOS-SREBP2^T610M (T610M) cell culture media, and after exogenously adding PKM2 or PKM2-K367M, phosphorylation of SREBP2 was detected after GST pulldown assay. The results revealed that when kinase activity was not impaired, PKM2 could phosphorylate SREBP2 at T610 (Fig. 5I).

In HOS and U2OS cells, the expression of several key genes that regulate lipogenesis were detected after interference with lncCCAT1. The RT-qPCR and western blotting results showed that the expression of key genes in lipogenesis decreased after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 6A and B). Fluorescence microscopy revealed that interference with lnCCCAT1 reduced the lipid content of OS cells (Fig. 6C). In HOS and U2OS cells, the triglyceride and cholesterol contents decreased after interference with lncCCAT1 (Fig. 6D). These results indicated that lncCCAT1 promoted lipogenesis in OS cells.

In vivo results revealed that HOS cells interfered with lncCCAT1, which resulted in slower growth of xenografts (Fig. 7A) and lighter weight xenografts (Fig. 7B). The expression of glycolysis-related proteins in the two groups was detected by IHC, and the results revealed that the positive rates of HK2 and LDHA were decreased in the sh-lncCCAT1 group (Fig. 7C). Western blotting revealed that the expression levels of HK2, PFKFB3, LDHA, and PDK1 were decreased in the sh-lncCCAT1 group (Fig. 7D). The expression of the lipid synthesis-related proteins, FASN and SCD1, was detected by IHC, and the results revealed that the positive rates of FASN and SCD1 were decreased in the transplanted tumor of the sh-lncCCAT1 group (Fig. 7E). Western blotting revealed that the expression levels of ACC1, ACLY, ELOVL6, and SCD5 were decreased in the sh-lncCCAT1 group (Fig. 7F).