<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-0981</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1015</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ETM-26-2-12090</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2023.12090</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique in percutaneous vertebroplasty for K&#x00FC;mmell disease</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>Dexin</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Huimin</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yong</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Xuri</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Wei</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="aff"/>
<xref rid="c1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="corresp"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ETM-26-2-12090">Department of Spine Surgery, Yantaishan Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, Shandong 264003, P.R. China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ETM-26-2-12090"><italic>Correspondence to:</italic> Professor Wei Du, Department of Spine Surgery, Yantaishan Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, 10087 Science and Technology Avenue, Yantai, Shandong 264003, P.R. China <email>pengjh@gxmu.edu.cn spineduwei@163.com </email></corresp>
<fn><p><italic>Abbreviations:</italic> PVP, percutaneous vertebroplasty; PKP, percutaneous kyphoplasty; IVC, intravertebral vacuum cleft; OVCF, osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; VAS, visual analogue scale; ODI, Oswestry disability index; AVH, anterior vertebral height; BMD, bone mineral density; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year></pub-date>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<elocation-id>391</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; Zou et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique combined with the postural reduction in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for K&#x00FC;mmell disease. For this purpose, a retrospective study was performed on 18 patients with K&#x00FC;mmell disease who between January 2018 and June 2021 underwent bilateral pedicle cement anchoring combined with postural reduction in PVP. Pre- and post-operative bone mineral density, injected cement volume, visual analogue scale (VAS) values, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, Cobb angle measurements and anterior vertebral height (AVH) were recorded and assessed. The mean follow-up duration was 8.4&#x00B1;1.2 months. The average VAS score decreased from 8.17&#x00B1;0.71 pre-operatively to 1.56&#x00B1;0.62 post-operatively and remained at 2.00&#x00B1;0.91 at the final follow-up visit (P&#x003C;0.05). The average ODI improved from 86.44&#x00B1;5.5 pre-operatively to 24.33&#x00B1;7.82 post-operatively. Until the last follow-up, the ODI remained at 27.11&#x00B1;8.76 (P&#x003C;0.05). Similarly, the changes in the Cobb angle and AVH before and after surgery were also statistically significant in the radiological evaluation (P&#x003C;0.05). During the follow-up, two patients experienced adjacent vertebral fractures. The loosening of cement was not found. Overall, the present study demonstrated that during the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease with PVP, the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique combined with postural reduction can achieve good clinical outcomes.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>K&#x00FC;mmell disease</kwd>
<kwd>percutaneous vertebroplasty</kwd>
<kwd>osteoporosis</kwd>
<kwd>cement anchoring</kwd>
<kwd>postural reduction</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Funding:</bold> No funding was received.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In 1895, the German surgeon, Hermann K&#x00FC;mmell, described six patients with delayed compression fractures for the first time (<xref rid="b1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). All of these patients had a history of slight spinal trauma. After an asymptomatic period lasting a few weeks or months, they experienced progressive back pain, accompanied by a gradually worsening kyphosis, and even neurological deficits. At first, K&#x00FC;mmell disease was considered to be very rare; however, with the rapid development of imaging technologies, particularly CT and MRI, the detection rate of K&#x00FC;mmell disease increased significantly (<xref rid="b2-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). The intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC) is a typical imaging manifestation (<xref rid="b3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). The exact pathogenesis of K&#x00FC;mmell disease remains controversial and the majority of researchers consider that it is caused by the ischemic necrosis of vertebral bodies (<xref rid="b4-ETM-26-2-12090 b5-ETM-26-2-12090 b6-ETM-26-2-12090 b7-ETM-26-2-12090 b8-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">4-8</xref>).</p>
<p>According to the clinical symptoms and the degree of damage in the fractured vertebral body on a radiograph and MRI, Li <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b9-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>) divided K&#x00FC;mmell disease into three stages as follows: Stage I, in which the loss of vertebral body height is &#x003C;20&#x0025;, there is no degeneration of adjacent intervertebral discs, no low back pain symptoms or mild symptoms; stage II, in which the loss of vertebral body height is &#x003C;20&#x0025;, the fractured vertebral body has dynamic instability and there is adjacent intervertebral disc degeneration; stage III, in which the posterior cortex breakage is accompanied by dynamic instability and kyphosis of the vertebral body leads to spinal canal stenosis with or without neurological deficits. According to relevant literature reports (<xref rid="b2-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>,<xref rid="b4-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>,<xref rid="b5-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b10-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b11-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>), percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) have achieved good clinical outcomes in the treatment of stage I and II K&#x00FC;mmell disease, and even stage III K&#x00FC;mmell disease without neurological deficits can also be treated by PKP. Although both K&#x00FC;mmell disease and common osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) can be treated with PKP or PVP, there are still significant differences in post-operative radiographs between them. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in common OVCF surgery is evenly distributed in the fractured vertebra and PMMA and bone trabeculae are interlocked with each other. However, PMMA in K&#x00FC;mmell disease is mainly concentrated in the IVC of the fractured vertebra to form a bone cement mass, which has a clear boundary with the surrounding bone. In this case, PMMA is very easy to loosen at the bone-cement interface, which will lead to the recurrence of vertebral instability, and the patient&#x0027;s low back pain will once again worsen, even with neurological deficits (<xref rid="b3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b8-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b12-ETM-26-2-12090 b13-ETM-26-2-12090 b14-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">12-14</xref>). Therefore, for patients with K&#x00FC;mmell disease, identifying a method to firmly fix the PMMA in the IVC to prevent loosening is the key to achieving good clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>The present study attempted to solve the problem of PMMA loosening by using a modified PVP technique. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique combined with the postural reduction in PVP for K&#x00FC;mmell disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Patients|methods">
<title>Patients and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patients</title>
<p>Written informed consent was obtained from each patient and the use of any relevant clinical images was authorized by the patient for scientific research and online open-access publication. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yantaishan Hospital (Yantai, China; approval no. 20211005028). The study protocol strictly adhered to the ethical guidelines of The Declaration of Helsinki 1975(<xref rid="b15-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Based on the sample size calculation formula N=2&#x005B;1+(K+1)&#x03C1;&#x005D;&#x005B;(&#x03C3;<sup>2</sup>(Z<sub>1-</sub><sub>&#x03B1;</sub>+Z<sub>1-</sub><sub>&#x03B2;</sub>)<sup>2</sup>/K&#x03B4;<sup>2</sup>)&#x005D;, the hospital statistician suggested that the minimum sample size (N) should be &#x2265;16 cases to obtain meaningful statistical results based on the incidence of K&#x00FC;mmell disease, based on confidence intervals (&#x03B1; and &#x03B2;), the critical value of the normal distribution (Z), the number of repeated measurements (K), smallest meaningful difference to be detected (&#x03B4;), measurement standard deviation (&#x03C3;) and internal correlation coefficient (&#x03C1;).</p>
<p>Between January 2018 and June 2021, a total of 26 patients diagnosed with K&#x00FC;mmell disease based on medical history, radiograph (Multix Fusion; Siemens Healthineers), 128-detector multislice CT scanner (Somatom Definition Flash; Siemens Healthineers) and 1.5-T MRI (Magnetom Aera; Siemens Healthineers) were visited at Yantaishan Hospital (Yantai, China; approval no. 20211005028) and retrospectively included in the present study. However, the patients with &#x2265;2 spinal vertebral fractures, tumors, infections, pedicle fractures and neurological deficits were excluded from the present study. All patients were initially screened according to the exclusion criteria and a total of eight patients were excluded from the study, including three with multilevel involvements, one with pedicle fracture, and three with neurological deficits. Finally, 18 patients were included in this study (<xref rid="f1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="fig">Fig 1A-D</xref>). All patients were treated with PVP with the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique and postural reduction. The surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon at the Department of Spine Surgery, Yantaishan Hospital. In terms of sex distribution, the study involved five male and 13 female patients. The age of the patients ranged from 69-82 years, with an average age of 76.5&#x00B1;3.8 years. In total, 15 of the 18 patients had senile diseases, including six cases of hypertension, three cases of diabetes, three cases of coronary heart disease and three cases of diabetes with coronary heart disease, which were well controlled during the peri-operative period. The other demographic and clinical data, such as bone mineral density (BMD), fractured level, injected cement volume, etc., are presented in <xref rid="tI-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and osteoporosis was defined by a T-score &#x2264;-2.5 standard deviations (SD).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Surgical procedure</title>
<p>All surgeries were performed under local anesthesia. The patient was placed in a prone position on a Jackson operating table, the chest and iliac region were elevated and the abdomen was suspended, so that the fractured vertebra was opened and repositioned as much as possible under the hyperextension position. The bilateral transpedicular approach was performed under biplanar fluoroscopic guidance. Unlike traditional PVP surgery, the puncture point was located in the outer upper quadrant of the pedicle, and the needle angle was more vertical to avoid injury to the inner and lower walls of the pedicle as much as possible. First, under the guidance of fluoroscopy, the trocar and cannula systems are placed into the vertebral body through one side of the pedicle. The ideal position was that the needle tip was located in the IVC. Second, the drill was advanced to create a tunnel and then it was removed and Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, Tecres, Spa.) was injected into the vertebra. PMMA was divided into several 1-ml syringes in advance; thus, it was easy to evaluate the injected cement volume by counting the number of syringes used. Generally, the early injected PMMA cement was located in the IVC. After the IVC was filled, it was necessary to slowly inject PMMA cement while retreating the working cannula. In particular, when the working cannula was located in the pedicle, the injection speed of PMMA cement needed to be slower. At the same time, it was necessary to observe whether there was PMMA cement leakage under fluoroscopy and to ask the patient whether there was nerve irritation. Similarly, the same operation was performed on the opposite side to finally complete the surgical procedure.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Clinical and radiological assessment</title>
<p>Clinical and radiological assessments were performed pre-operatively, 1 day after the surgery and at the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of lower back pain and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to assess the degree of dysfunction (<xref rid="b16-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>,<xref rid="b17-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Radiological data were obtained and measured through the hospital&#x0027;s image archiving and communication systems (PACS) under authorization. The change in the anterior vertebral height (AVH) was obtained by measuring lateral radiographs or sagittal CT images. A straight line was drawn from the superior endplate one level above the fractured vertebral body and a straight line was then drawn from the inferior endplate of the one level below the fractured vertebral body. The intersection of the two lines was defined as the Cobb angle (<xref rid="f1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1A</xref>). The last follow-up time and postoperative complications were also recorded and analyzed (<xref rid="tI-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). The criteria for judging the post-operative loosening of PMMA cement were as follows: i) VAS or ODI scores of the patient were significantly worse than those on the first day after surgery; ii) instability of PMMA cement could be observed on a lateral radiograph film of the flexion and extension position; iii) on T2-weighted sagittal images of an MRI, there was an obvious annular edema enhancement zone between the PMMA cement and the surrounding bone (<xref rid="f1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1E-H</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Treatment of osteoporosis</title>
<p>Regular anti-osteoporosis treatment was performed throughout the course of the treatment and during follow-up. Patients were advised to take daily calcium and vitamin D supplements, as well as bisphosphonates. Teriparatide is currently recommended for patients as a first-line anti-osteoporosis treatment option as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp.). Each variable is presented as the mean &#x00B1; SD. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and the Bonferroni post hoc test. P&#x003C;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The modified PVP surgery used herein was successfully performed in all patients (<xref rid="f2-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="fig">Figs. 2</xref> and <xref rid="f3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="fig">3</xref>). The mean follow-up duration was 8.4&#x00B1;1.2 months (range, 6-11 months). The fractured vertebrae were mainly located in the thoracolumbar region (T10-L2): One in T10; three in T11; five in T12; six in L1; two in L2 and one in L3. The mean T-score of BMD in the present study was -3.2&#x00B1;0.4 SD (range, -2.6--4.2 SD). The mean injected cement volume was 8.5&#x00B1;1.0 ml (range, 7-10.5 ml).</p>
<p>The back pain of the patients improved significantly after the surgery, and their self-care ability and quality of life also significantly improved (<xref rid="tII-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table">Table II</xref>). The average pre-operative VAS score was 8.17&#x00B1;0.71 (range, 7-9) and the VAS score on the first day after surgery decreased to 1.56&#x00B1;0.62 (range, 1-3). The difference was statistically significant between the two groups before and after surgery (P&#x003C;0.05). The pain relief continued to be maintained. Until the final follow-up, the VAS score remained at 2.00&#x00B1;0.91 (range, 1-4), with only a slight change compared with that on the first day after surgery. The average pre-operative ODI was 86.44&#x00B1;5.5 (range,76-94) and the ODI on the first day after surgery decreased to 24.33&#x00B1;7.82 (range, 14-40). Until the final follow-up, the ODI remained at 27.11&#x00B1;8.76 (range, 16-44).</p>
<p>The mean Cobb angles and anterior vertebral heights were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. The Cobb angles decreased from 18.77&#x00B1;3.55&#x02DA; (range, 12-24&#x02DA;) pre-operatively to 9.94&#x00B1;0.21&#x02DA; (range, 7-14&#x02DA;) on the first day after surgery. At the final follow-up, the Cobb angles remained at 11.83&#x00B1;3.96&#x02DA; (range, 7-20&#x02DA;). The anterior vertebral heights increased from 13.22&#x00B1;1.90 mm (range, 10-16 mm) pre-operatively to 18.83&#x00B1;2.12 mm (range, 15-22 mm) on the first day after surgery. At the final follow-up, the anterior vertebral heights remained at 17.56&#x00B1;1.91 mm (raange, 13-21 mm). Statistically significant differences were found in kyphosis correction and vertebral height recovery between the pre-operative and post-operative time points (P&#x003C;0.05).</p>
<p>During the surgery and follow-up, no serious complications were encountered, such as pulmonary embolism, neurological deficits, cardiac arrest, etc. Similar to the traditional PVP procedure, PMMA cement leakage continues to be the most common complication. In the present study, five patients exhibited an asymptomatic leakage of PMMA cement and did not receive any specific treatment. In total, two patients with adjacent vertebral fractures were treated with PVP and the symptoms improved significantly. The loosening of cement was not observed in any of the patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Although the mechanism of K&#x00FC;mmell disease remains controversial, delayed avascular osteonecrosis of the vertebral body is widely accepted (<xref rid="b1-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b4-ETM-26-2-12090 b5-ETM-26-2-12090 b6-ETM-26-2-12090 b7-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">4-7</xref>). K&#x00FC;mmell disease can be regarded as a specific type of OVCF. The anterior 1/3 of the vertebral body is supplied by the terminal artery of the single segmental artery (<xref rid="b6-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b14-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). For elderly patients with osteoporosis, the blood supply of the vertebral terminal artery is weakened due to arteriosclerosis. At this time, a minor vertebral fracture will cause the interruption of the blood supply, leading to avascular necrosis of the vertebral body and a nonunion fracture. With the increase in avascular osteonecrosis, IVC may occur and, eventually, the vertebral body collapses. At the same time, the patient&#x0027;s back pain becomes more severe, even with neurological deficits (<xref rid="b8-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b18-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>,<xref rid="b19-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>).</p>
<p>According to the patient&#x0027;s medical history, photograph, CT and MRI examinations, the diagnosis of K&#x00FC;mmell disease is not difficult at present (<xref rid="b4-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). The appearance of IVC is a typical manifestation in an imaging examination. On MRI images, it can be observed that IVC is filled with gas or liquid which undergo a dynamic change according to the patient&#x0027;s position and bed rest time (<xref rid="b20-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b21-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). On T2-weighted images, a double-line sign can be observed: The periphery of IVC is surrounded by a hyperintensity zone and the outer layer is surrounded by hypointense sclerotic bone (<xref rid="b3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Hasegawa <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b22-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>) through the IVC histological examination of five patients found that the hyperintensity zone consisted of fibrocartilage tissue. Therefore, due to these characteristics, traditional conservative treatments such as a brace, bed rest and analgesics may not be suitable for the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (<xref rid="b8-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>,<xref rid="b23-ETM-26-2-12090 b24-ETM-26-2-12090 b25-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">23-25</xref>). At present, similar to the treatment of common OVCF, PVP or PKP remains the first choice for K&#x00FC;mmell disease without neurological deficits. However, for patients with common OVCF, bone cement and trabecular bone are fully interdigitated in the vertebral body, while for patients with K&#x00FC;mmell disease, bone cement is mainly concentrated in IVC, which has a clear boundary with the surrounding vertebral body and there is no sufficient mechanical interlock between them (<xref rid="b14-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). In this case, the bone cement mass in IVC gradually loosens, the scope of ischemic osteonecrosis is further expanded under repeated stress and, finally, kyphosis is aggravated due to the re-collapse of the vertebral body. Heo <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b14-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>) reported that among 21 patients with K&#x00FC;mmell disease treated with PVP, six patients had vertebral body re-collapse during follow-up and the incidence of re-collapse was 28.57&#x0025;. Their study suggested that PVP may be a relative contraindication of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (<xref rid="b14-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). Kim and Kim (<xref rid="b3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>) also reported that the corrected kyphotic angles may be reaggravated over time after PKP, suggesting that PKP is not suitable for K&#x00FC;mmell disease. On the contrary, through a prospective cohort study, Chang <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b5-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>) found that PVP and PKP could achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease and there was no significant difference between the two surgical methods during long-term follow-up.</p>
<p>In the present study, the PMMA cement mass was firmly fixed in the IVC in the vertebral body through the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technology under postural reduction. The bilateral pedicle and the PMMA cement mass formed a three-dimensional stable structure, which prevented as much as possible the loosening of PMMA cement in the IVC. The VAS and ODI scores of the patients after surgery were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. Pain and quality of life improved and were maintained well during follow-up. The Cobb angles of the patients after surgery also significantly improved. Although a slight correction loss occurred during follow-up, the difference was not statistically significant. In the present study, PVP was selected as the surgical method for K&#x00FC;mmell disease rather than PKP. It was considered that PKP has no obvious advantage over PVP in the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (<xref rid="b5-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>). Due to the existence of IVC, the natural opening of the vertebral body can be achieved through postural reduction under the prone position, and kyphosis can be corrected to a certain extent. Although PKP balloon dilation can achieve a greater kyphosis correction, relevant research has shown that excessive kyphosis correction cannot achieve good clinical outcomes. Kim and Kim (<xref rid="b3-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>) indicated that excessive kyphosis correction could cause instability of the fractured vertebra, leading to the injury of paravertebral soft tissues and ligaments. PKP appears to be unnecessary for K&#x00FC;mmell disease.</p>
<p>As with the traditional PVP procedure, PMMA cement leakage remains the most common complication. In the present study, the leakage rate of bone cement was 27.8&#x0025;. Chang <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b5-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>) reported that the bone leakage rates for K&#x00FC;mmell disease were 17.9 and 10.7&#x0025; in the PVP and PKP groups, respectively. As bone cement is mainly concentrated in the IVC and is surrounded by sclerotic bone, the leakage rate of bone cement may be lower than PVP for common OVCF (<xref rid="b26-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). Another common complication is an adjacent vertebral fracture and the incidence rate (11.1&#x0025;) of the present study was similar to that in a previous study (<xref rid="b27-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the present study still had the following limitations. First of all, the present study was a retrospective study with small sample size. Although good clinical outcomes were achieved, a prospective, randomized controlled study with a larger sample size is required to further verify its clinical efficacy. Secondly, the follow-up time in the present study did not exceed 12 months. Whether vertebral re-collapse will occur, causing further aggravation remains unclear. Thus, the present authors aim to continue the long-term follow-up. In the future, the present authors aim to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study to compare the differences between the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique and traditional PVP technology in the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease. The research protocol has been submitted to the hospital ethics committee for approval.</p>
<p>In conclusion, as demonstrated in the present study, during the treatment of K&#x00FC;mmell disease with PVP, the bilateral pedicle cement anchoring technique combined with postural reduction can effectively be used to prevent the loosening of PMMA cement in IVC, the aggravation of vertebral re-collapse and kyphosis. As a modified PVP technology, it can achieve good clinical outcomes.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; contributions</title>
<p>WD designed the research plan and wrote the manuscript. DZ performed the statistical analysis of the research data and assisted WD in the writing of the manuscript. HW, XS and YZ were responsible for data collection. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. DZ and WD confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title>
<p>Written informed consent was obtained from each patient and the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yantaishan Hospital (approval no. 20211005028). The authors declare that the methods carried out in this study were following The Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient consent for publication</title>
<p>The use of any relevant clinical images was authorized by the patient for scientific research and online open-access publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>An effective treatment option for K&#x00FC;mmell disease with neurological deficits: Modified transpedicular subtraction and disc osteotomy combined with long-segment fixation</article-title><source>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>e923</fpage><lpage>e930</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26825791</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BRS.0000000000001467</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>GL</given-names></name><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>ZP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Percutaneous kyphoplasty for kummell disease with severe spinal canal stenosis</article-title><source>Pain Physician</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>E1021</fpage><lpage>E1028</lpage><year>2015</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26606016</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Balloon kyphoplasty: An effective treatment for k&#x00FC;mmell disease?</article-title><source>Korean J Spine</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>102</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27799987</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14245/kjs.2016.13.3.102</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty at the hyperextension position for the treatment of osteoporotic K&#x00FC;mmell disease</article-title><source>Clin Spine Surg</source><volume>29</volume><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>166</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25719974</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BSD.0000000000000259</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>JZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bei</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>YP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty vs. kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease:A prospective cohort study</article-title><source>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</source><volume>21</volume><issue>238</issue><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32284058</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12891-020-03271-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Pathogenesis of the intravertebral vacuum of K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease</article-title><source>Exp Ther Med</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>879</fpage><lpage>882</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27446290</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2016.3369</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YH</given-names></name><name><surname>Ha</surname><given-names>KY</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Pathomechanism of intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine</article-title><source>Spine J</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>659</fpage><lpage>666</lpage><year>2014</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24055039</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.106</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Risk factors for recollapse of the augmented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with intravertebral vacuum cleft</article-title><source>Medicine (Baltimore)</source><volume>96</volume><issue>e5675</issue><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28079799</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MD.0000000000005675</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsieh</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Another option to treat K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease with cord compression</article-title><source>Eur Spine J</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>1479</fpage><lpage>1487</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16568304</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00586-006-0094-z</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name><name><surname>Lai</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Unipedicle percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal intraosseous vacuum cleft</article-title><source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source><volume>435</volume><fpage>148</fpage><lpage>153</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15930932</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.blo.0000155346.12405.70</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>SQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>RQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>HL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of neurologically intact osteoporotic K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease</article-title><source>BMC Surg</source><volume>21</volume><issue>65</issue><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33514359</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12893-021-01057-x</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Ju</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Delayed bone cement displacement following balloon kyphoplasty</article-title><source>J Korean Neurosurg Soc</source><volume>43</volume><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19096648</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3340/jkns.2008.43.4.212</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakamae</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamada</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsuchida</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Osti</surname><given-names>OL</given-names></name><name><surname>Adachi</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujimoto</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Risk factors for cement loosening after vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture with intravertebral cleft: A retrospective analysis</article-title><source>Asian Spine J</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>935</fpage><lpage>942</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30213178</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.935</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heo</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chin</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoon</surname><given-names>YS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuh</surname><given-names>SU</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Recollapse of previous vertebral compression fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty</article-title><source>Osteoporos Int</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>473</fpage><lpage>480</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18636218</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00198-008-0682-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shephard</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The 1975 declaration of helsinki and consent</article-title><source>Can Med Assoc J</source><volume>115</volume><fpage>1191</fpage><lpage>1192</lpage><year>1976</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1000449</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heller</surname><given-names>GZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Manuguerra</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chow</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>How to analyze the visual analogue scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance</article-title><source>Scand J Pain</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><year>2016</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28850536</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fairbank</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Pynsent</surname><given-names>PB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The oswestry disability index</article-title><source>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>2940</fpage><lpage>2952</lpage><year>2000</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11074683</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Libicher</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Appelt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Berger</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Baier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Meeder</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Grafe</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Dafonseca</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>N&#x00F6;ldge</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Kasperk</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The intravertebral vacuum phenomen as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: Results from a radiological and histological study</article-title><source>Eur Radiol</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>2248</fpage><lpage>2252</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17522865</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-007-0684-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chongyan</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mechanism of formation of intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An in vitro biomechanical study</article-title><source>Spine J</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>2297</fpage><lpage>2301</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30075299</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.020</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Linn</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Birkenmaier</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Reiser</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Baur-Melnyk</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The intravertebral cleft in acute osteoporotic fractures: Fluid in magnetic resonance imaging-vacuum in computed tomography?</article-title><source>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</source><volume>34</volume><fpage>e88</fpage><lpage>e93</lpage><year>2009</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19139659</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193ca06</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Maus</surname><given-names>TP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wald</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Thielen</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Bobra</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Luetmer</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intravertebral clefts opacified during vertebroplasty: Pathogenesis, technical implications, and prognostic significance</article-title><source>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>1642</fpage><lpage>1646</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12427615</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasegawa</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Homma</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Uchiyama</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Takahashi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Vertebral pseudarthrosis in the osteoporotic spine</article-title><source>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>2201</fpage><lpage>2206</lpage><year>1998</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9802162</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00007632-199810150-00011</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Application of anchoring technique in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for neurologically intact K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease</article-title><source>Pain Res Manag</source><volume>24</volume><issue>4145096</issue><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32566060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/4145096</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>QB</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ZK</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Different performance of intravertebral vacuum clefts in K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease and relevant treatment strategies</article-title><source>Orthop Surg</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32077262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/os.12609</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparative efficacy of three minimally invasive procedures for k&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis</article-title><source>Front Surg</source><volume>9</volume><issue>893404</issue><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35722530</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsurg.2022.893404</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krauss</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hirschfelder</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomandl</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Lichti</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>B&#x00E4;r</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Kyphosis reduction and the rate of cement leaks after vertebroplasty of intravertebral clefts</article-title><source>Eur Radiol</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>1015</fpage><lpage>1021</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16314915</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00330-005-0056-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ETM-26-2-12090"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeon</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>BM</given-names></name><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>K&#x00FC;mmell&#x0027;s disease treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty: Minimum 1 year follow-up</article-title><source>Korean J Neurotrauma</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><year>2017</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29201845</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13004/kjnt.2017.13.2.119</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-ETM-26-2-12090" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>A 76-year-old male patient with K&#x00FC;mmell disease at L1. (A) Lateral radiograph illustrating the measurement method of the Cobb angle. (B) CT and (C and D) MRI illustrating the intravertebral vacuum cleft of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (stage II). Post-operative (E) Flexion and (F) Extension radiographs illustrating the instability of PMMA cement in the vertebral body. (G) Post-operative CT scan illustrating the low-density area between the PMMA cement and vertebral body. (H) Post-operative T2-weighted sagittal images of MRI showing annular edema enhancement zone between the PMMA cement and surrounding bone. PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-26-02-12090-g00.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f2-ETM-26-2-12090" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>A 78-year-old female patient with K&#x00FC;mmell disease at L2. Pre-operative (A) Flexion and (B) Extension radiographs illustrating the instability of the L2 vertebral body. (C) CT and (D) MRI illustrating the intravertebral vacuum cleft of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (stage III). (E and F) Post-operative radiographs and (G and H) CT scans illustrate that the intravertebral vacuum cleft was filled with PMMA cement and the PMMA cement was firmly fixed to the vertebral body through bilateral pedicle anchoring technology. PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-26-02-12090-g01.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f3-ETM-26-2-12090" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>A 75-year-old male patient with K&#x00FC;mmell disease at L1. Pre-operative (A) Radiograph, (B) CT and (C and D) MRI scans illustrating the intravertebral vacuum cleft of K&#x00FC;mmell disease (stage III). Post-operative (E and F) Radiographs and (G and H) CT scans illustrate that the intravertebral vacuum cleft was filled with PMMA cement and the PMMA cement was firmly fixed to the vertebral body through bilateral pedicle anchoring technology. PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="etm-26-02-12090-g02.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-ETM-26-2-12090" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption><p>Demographic and clinical data.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Visual analogue scale score</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Oswestry disability index, &#x0025;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Cobb angle, deg</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3">Anterior vertebral height, mm</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">&#x00A0;</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Case no.</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sex/age, years</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Level</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Bone mineral density</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Injected cement volume, ml</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Pre</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Post</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">FFU</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Pre</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Post</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">FFU</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Pre</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Post</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">FFU</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Pre</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Post</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">FFU</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">FFU, months</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Complication</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Comorbidity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-4.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">ACL, AVF</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM, CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">ACL</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/82</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">AVF</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM, CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">ACL</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM, CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">ACL</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-2.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">HTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">M/81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">T12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">CHD</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">F/75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">L1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">-3.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">ACL</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">DM</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>M, male; F, female; anterior vertebral height; FFU, final follow-up; AVF, adjacent vertebral fracture; ACL, asymptomatic cement leakage; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; CHD, coronary heart disease.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-ETM-26-2-12090" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption><p>Comparisons of preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up clinical parameters.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Parameters</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Preoperative</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Postoperative</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Final follow-up</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">F<sup><xref rid="tfna-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Visual analogue scale</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.17&#x00B1;0.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.56&#x00B1;0.62<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00&#x00B1;0.91<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref>,<xref rid="tfnc-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">920.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Oswestry disability index, &#x0025;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.44&#x00B1;5.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.33&#x00B1;7.82<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">27.11&#x00B1;8.76<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref>,<xref rid="tfnc-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2,464.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cobb angle, deg</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.77&#x00B1;3.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.94&#x00B1;2.01<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.83&#x00B1;3.96<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref>,<xref rid="tfnc-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">122.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Anterior vertebral height, mm</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.22&#x00B1;1.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.83&#x00B1;2.12<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.56&#x00B1;1.91<sup><xref rid="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">b</xref>,<xref rid="tfnc-ETM-26-2-12090" ref-type="table-fn">c</xref></sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">101.87</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni&#x0027;s correction.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfna-ETM-26-2-12090"><p><sup>a</sup>Geisser-Greenhouse adjusted F-value.</p></fn>
<fn id="tfnb-ETM-26-2-12090"><p><sup>b</sup>P&#x003C;0.05 vs. preoperative values;</p></fn>
<fn id="tfnc-ETM-26-2-12090"><p><sup>c</sup>P&#x003C;0.05 vs. postoperative values after Bonferroni&#x0027;s correction.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
