OL Oncology Letters 1792-1074 1792-1082 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ol.2024.14233 OL-27-3-14233 Articles Preoperative visceral fat index predicts the survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer after surgery ZuoLugen 1 * LinJianxiu 2 * GeSitang 1 WuRong 3 LiuBaoxinzi 4 ChengYing 4 TianYun 4 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233004, P.R. China First Clinical Medical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, P.R. China Department of General Surgery, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, P.R. China Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China Correspondence to: Dr Yun Tian, Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine and Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, 155 Hanzhong Road, Qinhuai, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China, E-mail: fsyy00671@njucm.edu.cn lilinfeng@renji.com

Contributed equally

 03 2024 15 01 2024 27 3 99 09072023 27112023 Copyright: © Zuo et al. 2024 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Visceral adipose tissue and skeletal muscle mass are associated with carcinogenesis and clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of body composition parameters on postoperative survival in patients with gastric cancer. Demographic data and systemic inflammatory response data were obtained from patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy. The patient's skeletal muscle and visceral fat were assessed using computed tomography, and the corresponding skeletal muscle index (SMI) and visceral fat index (VFI) were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed. Of the 342 patients from whom information was collected, 125 of these patients eventually succumbed to the disease. A total of 271 (79.24%) of the patients were male and 71 (20.76%) were female. Regarding the entire cohort, the mean age was 64 years [interquartile range (IQR), 56–74 years], while the mean body mass index collected was 21.53 (IQR, 19.27–24.22). The median SMI and VFI of the patients were 47.73 (IQR, 41.67–55.51) and 41.28 (IQR, 36.62–45.36), respectively. It was concluded that a low SMI and VFI were associated with worse survival outcomes. However, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and perioperative blood transfusion were not significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Among the indicators assessed, a low VFI was an independent risk factor associated with the worst OS time (hazard ratio 1.59; confidence interval, 1.03–2.45; P=0.038). Finally, a prognostic nomogram was constructed which included the VFI to assist clinicians in making more informed decisions. In conclusion, after data collection and analysis, it was found that there was a significant correlation between a low VFI and a shorter OS time in patients with gastric cancer following gastrectomy, suggesting that VFI may be a promising therapeutic target for postoperative interventions to improve patient survival further.

 gastric cancer prognosis skeletal muscle visceral fat computed tomography Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine kgr0255 The present study was partly supported by funding from the Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine (Nanjing, China; grant no. kgr0255). Introduction

Gastric carcinoma is the fifth most common type of primary carcinoma and is the third most common cause of cancer-associated death. Surgery is the primary mode of treatment currently available for the management of gastric carcinoma (1,2). At present, there is a significant amount of interest in the factors influencing the prognosis of stomach cancer, allowing for a more precise risk assessment of preoperative patients. The four primary known potential risk factors for gastric cancer are preoperative carcinoembronic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels, preoperative systemic inflammation (3) and perioperative blood transfusion (4). These factors have been shown to be significantly correlated with prognosis in patients with stomach malignancies. Apart from these four acknowledged factors, the health condition of individuals with stomach cancer is a crucial factor that influences their prognosis (5). The relationship between a patient's body composition and their clinical prognosis for cancer has garnered increasing interest in recent years. It is becoming more widely acknowledged that skeletal muscle mass, a type of bodily component that can be assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan, affects the prognosis of patients who have undergone stomach cancer surgery (6–8). A decreased skeletal muscle mass has been found to be an independent risk factor for long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer in prior clinical research (9), yet there has been disagreement on this finding due to variations in the diagnostic criteria between cohorts (10,11).

The body mass index (BMI), sometimes referred to as the weight index, provides insight into an individual's nutritional state, amount of body fat and stage of human development (12). However, as individuals have different fat distributions, BMI does not always accurately represent the buildup of adipose tissue. Visceral adipose tissue is a preferable option over BMI since it can more precisely indicate the existence of fat cell dysfunction (13,14). Previous studies have shown that metabolic diseases can have an impact on changes in visceral adipose tissue gain or loss (15), and these changes further suggest abnormalities in the intra-abdominal environment (16). As our knowledge of visceral adipose tissue has expanded, excess adiposity, a physical characteristic linked to malignant prognosis, has emerged as a topic of intense interest (17,18). Adipose tissue accumulation worsens prognosis in a number of cancer types and raises the probability of additional cancer progression; this is partly due to the interaction between adipocytes and cancer cells (19). High intraperitoneal fat thickness has been linked to a reduced OS rate in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, according to clinical trials (20). However, these results will need to be further confirmed in further studies, as there are few investigations on whether pre-operative intraperitoneal fat impacts the long-term survival of patients with stomach cancer following surgical operations (21–23).

East Asia has a significantly higher incidence of stomach cancer than the rest of the world (24). The majority of individuals in East Asia are from China. However, there is very little research on the impact of preoperative body composition on the postoperative long-term survival of Chinese patients with gastric cancer, as the majority of studies on visceral fat and skeletal muscle focus on patients' postoperative condition (25,26). In the present study, the visceral fat area and skeletal muscle mass were measured using preoperative CT scans. Next, the collected data were used to evaluate the predictive power of body composition characteristics on overall survival (OS) time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study assessing how preoperative body composition affects postoperative patient survival following gastric surgery in a Chinese cohort.

 Patients and methods <sec> <title>Patients

The present study was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with gastric cancer (stage I–III) who underwent gastrectomy between January 2007 and December 2009 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (Bengbu, China). The criteria for patient inclusion in the study were the following: i) Histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and planned to receive elective curative surgery for gastrointestinal cancer; ii) age >18 years; iii) non-obese patients, defined as body mass index <30 kg/m2; and iv) within 1 month prior to gastric cancer surgery, the patient had abdominal CT image data. Patients were excluded from the study cohort when CT image quality was sufficient for an analysis to confirm that the patient had metastatic cancer that could not be cured by surgical treatment and when the patient had undergone a part gastrectomy for an incomplete cure of stomach cancer. These reasons could also lead to the exclusion of patients from the cohort if contact was lost with them for some reason that prevented follow-up, or if a patient had multiple malignancies at the same time. This study used patient data from a digestive tumor clinical database that was established with approval from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (Bengbu, China; approval no. 2020KY022). The Clinical Medical Research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College waived the requirement for informed consent for the collection of retrospective data.

 Data collection

Anthropometric data (height and weight closest to CT time), tumor features, operative information, postoperative treatment and comorbidity data were collected for patients in the cohort from the institution's electronic medical records. Patients were staged with gastric carcinoma according to the relevant provisions in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual (eighth edition) (27). In addition, to make the study more comprehensive and credible, demographic information (including age and sex), laboratory data and other relevant data for subsequent examination were included for analysis. In addition, the systemic inflammation status of the patients was quantified using the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

 Body composition assessment

For the body composition assessments, a patient was required to lie down in the supine position and then their skeletal muscle area (SMA) and visceral fat area (VFA) were measured using CT. At the time of measurement, the Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholds ranged from-29 to 150 HU for skeletal muscle and 50 to 150 HU for visceral adipose tissue (9,28). The tool used to calculate the total cross-sectional SMA and VFA for the 3rd lumbral vertebra was ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) (Fig. 1A). For these data measurements, two experienced researchers were selected. The Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) was measured by dividing the patient's skeletal muscle measurement by the square of their height (m2), whereas the Visceral Fat Index (VFI) was obtained by dividing the patient's area of visceral fat (cm2) by the square of their height (m2). As previous studies based on CT imaging have not given a valid definition of low adiposity or low bone mass in patients with cancer (29–31), the study cohort was divided into high and low SMI and VFI groups based on the median value of the data of the present cohort.

 Outcomes

In this study, all individuals diagnosed with gastric carcinoma were examined at standard outpatient clinics or subsequently monitored. The outcome of this study was the overall patient survival rate, which was the number of days the patient being studied had survived from the initial date of diagnosis. A sequence of study-related observations was performed on the individual under study until their death, regardless of the cause, or until the final follow-up visit. If the patient was still alive at the final follow-up visit, they were removed from the study cohort on the date of their last contact.

 Statistical analysis

In the exploratory analysis, more structured descriptive statistics were performed on the data collected, including the means, standard deviations and percentages, which is presented in a tabular form. Kaplan-Meier curves were also used to further determine the role of each factor in survival outcomes. To compare differences between survival curves, a Log-rank test was used. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for the univariate and multivariate survival analysis on the collected data. For stratification of the SMI and VFI for Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the median value was used to separate the patients into low and high VFI and SMI groups. For the calculation of overall patient mortality, all patients included in the study who survived gastric cancer from the time of surgery to the end of follow-up and the total number of people who died midway or were lost to follow-up for various reasons were used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp.), and all calculated P-values were two-tailed. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

 Results <sec> <title>Baseline characteristics

Out of the total data gathered between 2007 and 2009, 342 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, with 271 (79.24%) of them being male. The median age of all participants in the study was 64 years, with the range of 56–74. Following the standard staging of the 342 patients, it was determined that 16 patients (4.68%) were diagnosed with stage I gastric carcinoma, 147 patients (42.98%) with stage II gastric carcinoma and 179 patients (52.34%) with stage III gastric carcinoma. Out of all the patients who were included, a total of 233 individuals (68.13%) underwent a subtotal gastrectomy, while an additional 109 patients (31.87%) underwent a total gastrectomy. Upon careful examination of the follow-up records of all participants, it was determined that 125 individuals had died by the conclusion of the study period. The median duration of follow-up for all patients included in the present study was 29.54 months, ranging between 3 and 98 months. Table I provides an overview of the baseline characteristics of the included patients.

 Body composition measurement

Two investigators examined CT images from the 342 participants. The median BMI of the cohort was 21.53 (IQR, 19.27–24.22), whereas the calculated median SMI and VFI were 47.73 (IQR, 41.67–55.51) and 41.28 (IQR, 36.62–45.36), respectively (data not shown).

 Association between body composition and OS

The correlation between various body composition parameters, such as SMI and VFI, and the subsequent data on OS were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that patients with a low VFI exhibited a lower OS time than patients with high VFI (P=0.012; Fig. 1B). The Kaplan-Meier curves also revealed a significant postoperative disparity in OS between individuals with low SMI and those with high SMI (P=0.02; Fig. 1C).

 Risk factors associated with a worse prognosis

Next, other potential risk factors associated with a worse prognosis in individuals with gastric carcinoma after surgery were evaluated. Univariate Cox survival analysis was performed for all clinical factors. Subgroups were set up for TNM clinical staging (6th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual), and the results are shown in Table II, where T2, TX, N2 and N3 were independent factors affecting prognosis. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted based on the clinical stages that independently influenced prognosis. T2 (P=0.018; Fig. 1D) was a protective factor, and TX (P=0.042; Fig. 1E), N2 (P=0.007; Fig. 1F) and N3 (P<0.0001 Fig. 1G) were risk factors for a worse prognosis.

Other clinical factors, including age, sex, NLR, perioperative blood transfusion, preoperative CEA levels, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, plasma glucose and preoperative BMI, amongst other factors, were not significantly associated with OS in the present cohort. However, preoperative CA19-9 levels were an independent factor affecting prognosis (P=0.001).

 Predictors of adverse outcomes

To obtain more accurate results on independent risk factors affecting the long-term survival of patients, multivariate Cox analyses were performed for factors with P-values <0.1. CA19-9, NLR, SMI, VFI and stages T2, TX, N2 and N3 cancer were included in the Cox regression analysis. As shown in Table II, among the validated risk factors, CA19-9 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.000–1.002; P<0.0001] and high VFI level (HR, 0.620; 95% CI, 0.428–0.898; P=0.011) were associated with a long OS time, while N2 (HR, 2.660; 95% CI: 1.719–4.118; P<0.0001) and N3 (HR 3.313; 95% CI: 2.127–5.159; P<0.0001) were associated with a short OS time. NLR or SMI were not independent factors influencing OS. Some of the serological indicators associated with VFI were then analyzed to verify whether there were any differences in these serological indicators in patients in the high and low VFI groups. Among the serological indicators included (including triglycerides, LDL, HDL and plasma glucose), only the expression level of triglycerides was significantly different in the two groups of patients (P<0.05).

 Construction of a prognostic nomogram including VFI

Next, a prognostic nomogram (Fig. 2A) was constructed using the variables that were significant in the results of the multivariate Cox survival analysis. To verify that the constructed nomogram model had good clinical value, ROC curves were plotted (Fig. 2B) as well as 1-, 3- and 5-year calibration curves (Fig. 2C-E). The area under the ROC curve was 0.718, 0.691 and 0.731 for 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. The results showed that the nomogram had good clinical consistency and may thus be used for subsequent survival prediction in patients after gastric cancer surgery.

 Discussion

The present study examined the value of CT-measured visceral adiposity and skeletal muscle mass in predicting postoperative patient prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. The results indicated an association between a low VFI and a poor prognosis, further suggesting a potential role for visceral fat status in identifying patients with gastric cancer who have an unfavorable clinical outcome following gastrectomy.

Recent studies have found that visceral fat can induce carcinogenesis via several pathways, including inflammation associated with adipocytokines, reducing reactive oxygen levels and inducing insulin resistance (15,16,32). Adipocytes exert local and/or systemic effects through the secretion of a wide range of signaling molecules, such as leptin, adiponectin and resistin, and may have an impact on tumor growth (19). It has been suggested that these adipocytokines secreted by visceral fat can attract aggregations of macrophages and T cells, which in turn produce cytokines that promote carcinogenesis, such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 (33,34). Conversely, visceral fat lessens adiponectin discharge, and clinical trials have shown that adiponectin exhibits anticancer activity (35,36). Additionally, cancer-associated adipocytes affect tumor biology via multiple mechanisms, including certain indirect mechanisms such as promoting angiogenesis and promoting inflammation via the secretion of inflammatory cytokines (37,38); cancer-associated adipocytes also provide direct metabolic benefits to cancer cells (39,40). Therefore, theoretically, there may be a correlation between visceral adipose tissue accumulation and a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. In fact, dysregulated deposition of excess fat is associated with a worse prognosis in lethal cancer types (41–43). More importantly, trials have highlighted high intraperitoneal fat thickness as an independent correlate of shorter OS time in patients with advanced gastric cancer (20). A decrease in adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle amyotrophy are common in the development and treatment of people who suffer from cancer. In clinical practice, tissue atrophy is a multifactorial disease, and almost all common methods used to reverse this syndrome by targeting specific circulatory factors have failed (44,45). Likewise, due to the urgent need to treat the disease, a large quantity of research is focused on muscle atrophy in patients with malignancies and its impact on survival rates (46). The notion that a low VFI may reflect cancer prognosis is supported by a previous study, which established that low visceral fat content in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer was associated with a worse prognosis (22). The data from the present study also confirmed the notion that a low VFI was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. In addition, VFI has been demonstrated to have a protective effect on cancer prognosis in other types of cancer, such as colorectal cancer (47). The present study provides evidence that VFI measured by CT preoperatively may be a useful measure of prognostic prediction in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy.

Skeletal muscle, of all the body's protein pools, is the largest (48). Naturally, measuring the volume of whole-body skeletal muscle is an important parameter for assessing whole-body protein nutrition; however, this is independent of serum albumin levels (49). Nevertheless, in individuals who undergo surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer, skeletal muscle volume, relative to other influencing factors (such as weight or BMI), is a more accurate predictor of patient survival. Preoperative skeletal muscle volume is an important factor that can notably influence the prognosis of patients with gastric or colorectal carcinoma (50). Sarcopenia, a pathological syndrome of the skeletal muscle, is characterized by low muscle mass and reduced muscle function (strength or performance). In patients with a good status of nutrition, regarding the development of complications following gastrectomy, sarcopenia is an independent risk factor that has a notable impact on prognosis (51). Similarly, there is experimental evidence that low muscle mass is related to a worse prognosis following colon or gastric surgery (8,52). In one study, muscle volume was found to be significantly better than BMI for predicting survival in patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery under uniform diagnostic criteria (53). A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that low muscle mass was indicative of a worse prognosis in numerous clinical conditions (54). Notably, one study noted that preoperative lean body mass was not a significant risk factor for the death rate (10). Although the predictive effect of low SMI was not significant in the multivariate Cox regression analysis in the present study, in the univariate analysis, the results supported the conclusion that a low SMI was associated with a poorer prognosis. However, in the present cohort, there was no distinct evidence that SMI was an independent factor for a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer in the presence of other factors such as cancer stage and VFI.

In the present study, other potential risk factors including preoperative systemic inflammation and perioperative blood transfusion were evaluated. Systemic inflammation has been reported to be reflected by certain hematological inflammatory biomarkers, for example, NLR, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio. Conversely, systemic or local inflammation in association with the degree of cancer progression and relevant prognosis can also be reflected by the aforementioned biomarkers (55,56). It has been shown that systemic inflammation has an undesirable influence on cancer prognosis (3,57,58). Whether perioperative blood transfusion affects recurrence, survival and prognosis in patients who have had surgery for gastric carcinoma remains contested (59–61). By contrast, perioperative allogeneic blood transfusions have been shown to be associated with no further recurrence and reduced overall patient survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, but not with clinicopathological factors (4). However, the results of the present study do not demonstrate an association between preoperative systemic inflammation and overall survival after gastrectomy. It was not possible to determine the influence of perioperative blood transfusion on postoperative survival.

In addition, visceral fat and skeletal muscle play an important role in human homeostasis, thus the present study analyzed certain neuroendocrine-related indices that affect homeostasis (triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein and plasma glucose), but unfortunately, thyroid stimulating hormone could not be included in the analysis, as it is not a common screening index in patients with gastric cancer. The results showed that only triglyceride levels were significantly different between the two groups when patients were divided into high and low groups based on the median VFI, which is in line with a previous study that concluded that visceral fat and triglycerides are significantly correlated (13,62). Based on an opinion piece by Slominski et al (63), neuroendocrine factors have a significant impact on body homeostasis, of which visceral fat is included, so a focus should be placed on TSH and other neuroendocrine indices in patients with gastric cancer for predicting patient prognosis.

There are several limitations to the present study. First, the results of this study, which will be limited by its retrospective nature, may not avoid the adverse effects of selection bias and inevitably lack some relevant information, such as complete information on chemotherapy, progression-free survival and pro-inflammatory phenotype-related factors (TNF-α and IL-6), which is why these factors were excluded from any analyses performed. Second, there may be other confounding factors in the study that could not be controlled for, such as the socioeconomic status and dietary habits of the patients in the cohort, which may have some influence on body composition following gastrectomy. Third, the patients' muscular function was not validated, for example, handgrip strength and walking speed, both of which are important factors reflecting muscular function. Finally, this was a study based on a population in a rural area, with no relevant data from other areas/institutes to verify whether it applies to an urban population. Although it was not possible to determine whether these patients were affected by factors such as postoperative socioeconomic status and diet or postoperative muscle and fat changes, as the study was retrospective, the data derived from the present cohort suggest that a high preoperative VFI may be a predictor of long-term survival.

In conclusion, patient pre-surgical VFI, which is a CT-based measure for the analysis of body composition, was positively associated with OS in patients with gastric carcinoma. More importantly, the present study can be applied to preoperative patient VFI assessment in the future, and the results can be used as a tool for risk stratification to assist in clinical decision-making for patients with gastric cancer. VFI may be recommended as a means to predict the perioperative risk for gastric cancer patients, with more attention required for low VFI patients prior to surgery, as these patients may benefit from nutritional support.

 Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

 Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 Authors' contributions

YT, LZ and JL contributed to study conception and design, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and drafting of the manuscript. JL contributed to revising the manuscript. SG, RW, BL and YC contributed to study conception and design, interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and the final article corrections. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. YT, LZ and JL confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

 Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study used patient data from a digestive tumor clinical database that was established with approval from the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (Bengbu, China; approval no. 2020KY022). The Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (Bengbu, China) waived the requirement for informed consent for the collection of retrospective data.

 Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

 Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 Abbreviations BMI

body mass index

 CI

confidence interval

 CT

computed tomography

 HR

hazard ratio

 HU

Hounsfield unit

 IQR

interquartile range

 NLR

neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

 SMI

skeletal muscle index

 SMA

skeletal muscle area

 VFA

visceral fat area

 VFI

visceral fat index

 References BrayFFerlayJSoerjomataramISiegelRLTorreLAJemalAGlobal cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countriesCA Cancer J Clin68394424201810.3322/caac.2149230207593 LepageCSantMVerdecchiaAFormanDEsteveJFaivreJEUROCARE working groupOperative mortality after gastric cancer resection and long-term survival differences across EuropeBr J Surg97235239201010.1002/bjs.686520069605 LinJXLinJPXieJWWangJBLuJChenQYCaoLLLinMTuRZhengCHPrognostic value and association of sarcopenia and systemic inflammation for patients with gastric cancer following radical gastrectomyOncologist24e1091e1101201910.1634/theoncologist.2018-065130910865 SquiresMHIIIKoobyDAPoultsidesGAWeberSMBloomstonMFieldsRCPawlikTMVotanopoulosKISchmidtCREjazAEffect of perioperative transfusion on recurrence and survival after gastric cancer resection: A 7-institution analysis of 765 patients from the US gastric cancer collaborativeJ Am Coll Surg221767777201510.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.06.01226228017 PiazueloMBCorreaPGastric cáncer: OverviewColomb Med (Cali)44192201201324892619 SakuraiKKuboNTamuraTToyokawaTAmanoRTanakaHMugurumaKYashiroMMaedaKHirakawaKOhiraMAdverse effects of low preoperative skeletal muscle mass in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancerAnn Surg Oncol2427122719201710.1245/s10434-017-5875-628477088 KudouKSaekiHNakashimaYEdahiroKKorehisaSTaniguchiDTsutsumiRNishimuraSNakajiYAkiyamaSPrognostic significance of sarcopenia in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer or upper gastric cancerAnn Surg Oncol2418041810201710.1245/s10434-017-5811-928224363 YamamotoKHiraoMNishikawaKOmoriTYanagimotoYShinnoNSugimuraKMiyataHWadaHTakahashiHSarcopenia is associated with impaired overall survival after gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancerAnticancer Res3942974303201910.21873/anticanres.1359531366521 NishigoriTTsunodaSObamaKHisamoriSHashimotoKItataniYOkadaKSakaiYOptimal cutoff values of skeletal muscle index to define sarcopenia for prediction of survival in patients with advanced gastric cancerAnn Surg Oncol2535963603201810.1245/s10434-018-6728-730167910 SatoTAoyamaTHayashiTSegamiKKawabeTFujikawaHYamadaTYamamotoNOshimaTRinoYImpact of preoperative hand grip strength on morbidity following gastric cancer surgeryGastric Cancer1910081015201610.1007/s10120-015-0554-426466832 TegelsJJvan VugtJLReisingerKWHulseweKWHoofwijkAGDerikxJPStootJHSarcopenia is highly prevalent in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer but not associated with worse outcomesJ Surg Oncol112403407201510.1002/jso.2401526331988 RenehanAGTysonMEggerMHellerRFZwahlenMBody-mass index and incidence of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studiesLancet371569578200810.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X18280327 TchernofADesprésJPPathophysiology of human visceral obesity: An updatePhysiol Rev93359404201310.1152/physrev.00033.201123303913 AmatoMCGiordanoCGaliaMCriscimannaAVitabileSMidiriMGalluzzoAAlkaMeSy Study GroupVisceral adiposity index: A reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic riskDiabetes Care33920922201010.2337/dc09-182520067971 DesprésJPLemieuxIAbdominal obesity and metabolic syndromeNature444881887200610.1038/nature0548817167477 PouKMMassaroJMHoffmannUVasanRSMaurovich-HorvatPLarsonMGKeaneyJFJrMeigsJBLipinskaIKathiresanSVisceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are cross-sectionally related to markers of inflammation and oxidative stress: The framingham heart studyCirculation11612341241200710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.71050917709633 AlemánJOEusebiLHRicciardielloLPatidarKSanyalAJHoltPRMechanisms of obesity-induced gastrointestinal neoplasiaGastroenterology146357373201410.1053/j.gastro.2013.11.05124315827 Demark-WahnefriedWPlatzEALigibelJABlairCKCourneyaKSMeyerhardtJAGanzPARockCLSchmitzKHWaddenTThe role of obesity in cancer survival and recurrenceCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2112441259201210.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-048522695735 CozzoAJFullerAMMakowskiLContribution of adipose tissue to development of cancerCompr Physiol8237282201710.1002/cphy.c17000829357128 LiXTTangLChenYLiYLZhangXPSunYSVisceral and subcutaneous fat as new independent predictive factors of survival in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapyJ Cancer Res Clin Oncol14112371247201510.1007/s00432-014-1893-y25537963 WangSLMaLLChenXYZhouDLLiBHuangDDYuZShenXZhuangCLImpact of visceral fat on surgical complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomyEur J Clin Nutr72436445201810.1038/s41430-017-0032-729184135 HaradaKBabaYIshimotoTKosumiKTokunagaRIzumiDIdaSImamuraYIwagamiSMiyamotoYLow visceral fat content is associated with poor prognosis in a database of 507 upper gastrointestinal cancersAnn Surg Oncol2239463953201510.1245/s10434-015-4432-425712800 LiLLiWXuDHeHYangWGuoHLiuXJiWSongCXuHAssociation between visceral fat area and cancer prognosis: A population-based multicenter prospective studyAm J Clin Nutr118507517202310.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.07.00137422158 LópezMJCarbajalJAlfaroALSaraviaLGZanabriaDAraujoJMQuispeLZevallosABulejeJLChoCECharacteristics of gastric cancer around the worldCrit Rev Oncol Hematol181103841202310.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.10384136240980 LinYCLinGYehTSVisceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio independently predicts the prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer–highlighting the role of adiponectin receptors and PPARα, β/δ, ɤEur J Surg Oncol4730643073202110.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.02833941417 TanakaKMiyashiroIYanoMKishiKMotooriMShingaiTNouraSOhueMOhigashiHIshikawaOVisceral fat changes after distal gastrectomy according to type of reconstruction procedure for gastric cancerWorld J Surg Oncol11146201310.1186/1477-7819-11-14623786988 AminMBGreeneFLEdgeSBComptonCCGershenwaldJEBrooklandRKMeyerLGressDMByrdDRWinchesterDPThe eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ‘personalized’ approach to cancer stagingCA Cancer J Clin679399201710.3322/caac.2138828094848 MalietzisGCurrieACAthanasiouTJohnsNAnyameneNGlynne-JonesRKennedyRHFearonKCJenkinsJTInfluence of body composition profile on outcomes following colorectal cancer surgeryBr J Surg103572580201610.1002/bjs.1007526994716 RowanCRMcManusJBolandKO'TooleAVisceral adiposity and inflammatory bowel diseaseInt J Colorectal Dis3623052319202110.1007/s00384-021-03968-w34104989 LiSLiaoZHeKShenYHuSLiZAssociation of sex-specific abdominal adipose tissue with WHO/ISUP grade in clear cell renal cell carcinomaInsights Imaging14194202310.1186/s13244-023-01494-737980639 ChoeEKLeeYKangHYChoiSHKimJSAssociation between CT-measured abdominal skeletal muscle mass and pulmonary functionJ Clin Med8667201910.3390/jcm805066731083639 VongsuvanhRGeorgeJQiaoLvan der PoortenDVisceral adiposity in gastrointestinal and hepatic carcinogenesisCancer Lett330110201310.1016/j.canlet.2012.11.03823201597 MichaudADroletRNoëlSParisGTchernofAVisceral fat accumulation is an indicator of adipose tissue macrophage infiltration in womenMetabolism61689698201210.1016/j.metabol.2011.10.00422154325 WellenKEHotamisligilGSObesity-induced inflammatory changes in adipose tissueJ Clin Invest11217851788200310.1172/JCI2051414679172 BråkenhielmEVeitonmäkiNCaoRKiharaSMatsuzawaYZhivotovskyBFunahashiTCaoYAdiponectin-induced antiangiogenesis and antitumor activity involve caspase-mediated endothelial cell apoptosisProc Natl Acad Sci USA10124762481200410.1073/pnas.030867110014983034 RobertsDLDiveCRenehanAGBiological mechanisms linking obesity and cancer risk: New perspectivesAnnu Rev Med61301316201010.1146/annurev.med.080708.08271319824817 WagnerMDudleyACA three-party alliance in solid tumors: Adipocytes, macrophages and vascular endothelial cellsAdipocyte26773201310.4161/adip.2301623805401 NiemanKMRomeroILVan HoutenBLengyelEAdipose tissue and adipocytes support tumorigenesis and metastasisBiochim Biophys Acta183115331541201310.1016/j.bbalip.2013.02.01023500888 MeyerKANeeleyCKBakerNAWashabaughARFlesherCGNelsonBSFrankelTLLumengCNLyssiotisCAWynnMLAdipocytes promote pancreatic cancer cell proliferation via glutamine transferBiochem Biophys Rep7144149201627617308 Martinez-OutschoornUESotgiaFLisantiMPPower surge: Supporting cells ‘fuel’ cancer cell mitochondriaCell Metab1545201210.1016/j.cmet.2011.12.01122225869 BrownJCCaanBJPradoCMCespedes FelicianoEMXiaoJKroenkeCHMeyerhardtJAThe association of abdominal adiposity with mortality in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst112377383202010.1093/jnci/djz15031355882 Montano-LozaAJMazurakVCEbadiMMeza-JuncoJSawyerMBBaracosVEKnetemanNVisceral adiposity increases risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in male patients with cirrhosis and recurrence after liver transplantHepatology67914923201810.1002/hep.2957829023899 MoonHGJuYTJeongCYJungEJLeeYJHongSCHaWSParkSTChoiSKVisceral obesity may affect oncologic outcome in patients with colorectal cancerAnn Surg Oncol1519181922200810.1245/s10434-008-9891-418392660 FearonKArendsJBaracosVUnderstanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexiaNat Rev Clin Oncol109099201310.1038/nrclinonc.2012.20923207794 PennaFMineroVGCostamagnaDBonelliGBaccinoFMCostelliPAnti-cytokine strategies for the treatment of cancer-related anorexia and cachexiaExpert Opin Biol Ther1012411250201010.1517/14712598.2010.50377320594117 PradoCMMLieffersJRMcCargarLJReimanTSawyerMBMartinLBaracosVEPrevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenic obesity in patients with solid tumours of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts: A population-based studyLancet Oncol9629635200810.1016/S1470-2045(08)70153-018539529 CharetteNVandeputteCAmeyeLBogaertCVKrygierJGuiotTDeleporteADelaunoitTGeboesKVan LaethemJLPrognostic value of adipose tissue and muscle mass in advanced colorectal cancer: A post hoc analysis of two non-randomized phase II trialsBMC Cancer19134201910.1186/s12885-019-5319-830744591 FronteraWROchalaJSkeletal muscle: A brief review of structure and functionCalcif Tissue Int96183195201510.1007/s00223-014-9915-y25294644 Sánchez-TorralvoFJRuiz-GarcíaIContreras-BolívarVGonzález-AlmendrosIRuiz-VicoMAbuín-FernándezJBarriosMAlbaEOlveiraGCT-determined sarcopenia in GLIM-defined malnutrition and prediction of 6-month mortality in cancer inpatientsNutrients132647202110.3390/nu1308264734444806 EndoTMomokiCYamaokaMHachinoSIwataniSKiyotaSTanakaHHabuDValidation of skeletal muscle volume as a nutritional assessment in patients with gastric or colorectal cancer before radical surgeryJ Clin Med Res9844859201710.14740/jocmr3129w28912921 MaBWChenXYFanSDZhangFMHuangDDLiBShenXZhuangCLYuZImpact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes after radical gastrectomy for patients without nutritional riskNutrition616166201910.1016/j.nut.2018.10.02530703570 HuangDDWangSLZhuangCLZhengBSLuJXChenFFZhouCJShenXYuZSarcopenia, as defined by low muscle mass, strength and physical performance, predicts complications after surgery for colorectal cancerColorectal Dis17O256O264201510.1111/codi.1306726194849 ZhuangCLShenXZouHBDongQTCaiHYChenXLYuZWangSLEWGSOP2 versus EWGSOP1 for sarcopenia to predict prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: Analysis from a large-scale prospective studyClin Nutr3923012310202010.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.02431732287 RinninellaECintoniMRaoulPPozzoCStrippoliABriaETortoraGGasbarriniAMeleMCMuscle mass, assessed at diagnosis by L3-CT scan as a prognostic marker of clinical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisClin Nutr3920452054202010.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.02131718876 AurelloPTiernoSMBerardiGTomassiniFMagistriPD'AngeloFRamacciatoGValue of preoperative inflammation-based prognostic scores in predicting overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastric cancerAnn Surg Oncol2119982004201410.1245/s10434-014-3533-924515568 DiakosCICharlesKAMcMillanDCClarkeSJCancer-related inflammation and treatment effectivenessLancet Oncol15e493e503201410.1016/S1470-2045(14)70263-325281468 OkugawaYToiyamaYYamamotoAShigemoriTIdeSKitajimaTFujikawaHYasudaHHiroJYoshiyamaSLymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancerAnn Surg272342351202010.1097/SLA.000000000000323932675548 FelicianoEMCKroenkeCHMeyerhardtJAPradoCMBradshawPTKwanMLXiaoJAlexeeffSCorleyDWeltzienEAssociation of systemic inflammation and sarcopenia with survival in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the C SCANS studyJAMA Oncol3e172319201710.1001/jamaoncol.2017.231928796857 PergialiotisVThomakosNFrountzasMHaidopoulosDLoutradisDRodolakisAPerioperative blood transfusion and ovarian cancer survival rates: A meta-analysis based on univariate, multivariate and propensity score matched dataEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol252137143202010.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.01332603932 LatifMJTanKSMolenaDHuangJBottMJParkBJAdusumilliPSRuschVWBainsMSDowneyRJPerioperative blood transfusion has a dose-dependent relationship with disease recurrence and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancerJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg15724692477201910.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.10930902468 McSorleySTThamADolanRDSteeleCWRamsinghJRoxburghCHorganPGMcMillanDCPerioperative blood transfusion is associated with postoperative systemic inflammatory response and poorer outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancerAnn Surg Oncol27833843202010.1245/s10434-019-07984-731664621 MaerskMBelzaAStødkilde-JørgensenHRinggaardSChabanovaEThomsenHPedersenSBAstrupARichelsenBSucrose-sweetened beverages increase fat storage in the liver, muscle, and visceral fat depot: A 6-mo randomized intervention studyAm J Clin Nutr95283289201210.3945/ajcn.111.02253322205311 SlominskiRMRamanCChenJYSlominskiATHow cancer hijacks the body's homeostasis through the neuroendocrine systemTrends Neurosci46263275202310.1016/j.tins.2023.01.00336803800

(A) CT images for visceral fat assessment and CT images for skeletal muscle mass assessment in patients with stomach cancer. CT images were taken at the 3rd lumbar vertebra. i) Original CT scan image. ii) CT images after labeling. The yellow color indicates visceral fat, the blue color indicates subcutaneous fat and the red color indicates skeletal muscle mass. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the cumulative OS in patients with a low or high VFI. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves of OS in patients with a low or high SMI. Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS in patients with (D) T1 to T0, (E) T4 to T0, (F) N2 to N0 and (G) N3 to N0 stage cancer. OS, overall survival; CT, computed tomography; VFI, visceral fat index; SMI, skeletal muscle index.

(A) Predictive nomogram models, including CA19-9, VFI level, N2 and N3. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve for 1-, 3- and 5-year survival. (C-E): Validation of the 1-, 3- and 5-year calibration curves of the predictive model with the clinical reality. AUC, area under the curve; OS, overall survival.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the recruited cohort.

Clinicopathological factor Value
Median age (range), years 64 (56–71)
Sex, n (%)
  Male 271 (79.24)
  Female 71 (20.76)
Preoperative hemoglobin, g/la 121.19±23.87
Preoperative albumin, g/la 38.91±6.31
Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratiob 2.03 (1.51–3.08)
Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigenb 2.80 (1.60–4.95)
Preoperative CA19-9b 9.60 (4.44–28.63)
Stage, n (%)
  I 16 (4.68)
  II 147 (42.98)
  III 179 (52.34)
Body mass index, mg/m2b 21.53 (19.27–24.22)
SMI, cm2/m2b 47.73 (41.67–55.51)
VFI, cm2/m2b 41.28 (36.62–45.36)
Gastrectomy type, n (%)
  Partial excision 233 (68.13)
  Total excision 109 (31.87)

Mean ± SD.

Median (interquartile range).

Multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Univariate Cox analysis Multivariate Cox analysis
Factor P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI)
Age 0.403 1.008 (0.99–1.025)
Sex 0.277 0.791 (0.519–1.206)
White blood cell count 0.705 0.989 (0.934–1.047)
Neutrophil count 0.652 0.986 (0.928–1.048)
Lymphocyte count 0.803 1.030 (0.816–1.301)
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count 0.069 1.389 (0.975–1.980)
Hemoglobin 0.604 0.998 (0.991–1.005)
Albumin 0.229 0.981 (0.952–1.012)
Skeletal muscle index 0.040a 0.687 (0.480–0.983) 0.349 0.806 (0.513–1.266)
Visceral fat index 0.046a 0.989 (0.979–1.000) 0.011 0.620 (0.428–0.898)
Triglyceride 0.517 1.105 (0.817–1.469)
Low-density lipoprotein 0.948 0.991 (0.759–1.294)
High-density lipoprotein 0.122 1.468 (0.903–2.389)
Plasma glucose 0.504 1.038 (0.931–1.157)
Carcinoembryonic antigen 0.388 0.997 (0.990–1.004)
CA19-9 0.002b 1.001 (1.000–1.001) <0.00001 1.001 (1.000–1.002)
Body mass index 0.311 0.977 (0.933–1.022)
Surgical procedure 0.443 1.159 (0.795–1.689)
T2 vs. T1 0.023a 0.387 (0.170–0.879) 0.186 0.566 (0.244–1.315)
T3 vs. T1 0.454 0.864 (0.590–1.26)
T4 vs. T1 0.159 1.290 (0.905–1.84)
TX vs. T1 0.045a 1.567 (1.011–2.431) 0.374 1.230 (0.779–1.941)
N1 vs. N0 0.036 0.592 (0.363–0.966)
N2 vs. N0 0.008b 1.677 (1.147–2.451) <0.00001 2.660 (1.719–4.118)
N3 vs. N0 <0.0001c 2.631 (1.803–3.840) <0.00001 3.313 (2.127–5.159)
M1 vs. M0 0.132 1.879 (0.827–4.270)

P<0.05,

P<0.01,

P<0.0001. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.