Brain abscess (BA) constitutes 1-8% of all intracerebral tumors (1). Even though there has been immense progress made in diagnostic and treatment techniques, BA remains one of the reasons for unfavorable outcomes (2,3). However, modern neurosurgical techniques, such as the use of neuronavigation in brain surgical procedures, as well as non-invasive, accurate radiological techniques, such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and more targeted antibiotic therapy have succeeded in leading to notable improvements in the surgical outcomes of patients with BA (1,4).

Primary or hematogenous extended abscesses more frequently have an odontogenic or cardiogenic origin or are observed in immunocompromised patients and are usually located at the edge of gray and white matter (5). Over the past 15 years, the frequency of primary BAs has decreased, while the frequency of post-traumatic or post-operative (secondary) BAs has increased (6).

However, to the best of our knowledge, there is currently no data available concerning the suitable therapeutic management for BA, probably due to the low incidence. Moreover, to the very best of our knowledge, no consensus or randomized therapeutic trials have been published comparing the surgical outcomes of patients with primary and secondary BA (7).

The present study thus aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing the surgical outcomes of patients with primary and secondary BA, in order to determine the factors related to unfavorable outcomes.

In total, 32 patients who underwent surgical procedures for BAs with primary or secondary detection were registered in the present study. These patients were separated into two groups as follows: Group A (16 patients, 50%) with a primary abscess and group B (16 patients, 50%) with a secondary abscess. Of the 32 included patients, 23 (71.8%) were males, and the median age was 55.3 years (range, 9-82 years). The baseline demographic characteristics of the study participants are presented in Table I. The microorganisms isolated from the tissue biopsied during surgery are presented in Table III.

Univariate analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the following parameters: EVD and bilateral craniotomy/DC; the timing of IV treatment initiation prior to the intervention; and fever duration (P<0.05, Table IV).

Multivariate linear regression analysis (Table V) disclosed that all aforementioned parameters were associated with mortality. More specifically, ROC analysis for IV treatment initiation prior to intervention demonstrated that an interval of 21 days prior to the surgical procedure had better dispersion (97% sensitivity and 100% specificity) as evaluated by an area under the curve (AUC) standard error (SE) of 0.815 (0.085) and P<0.05, as shown in Table VI and Fig. 1. In addition, ROC analysis for fever duration revealed that an interval of 2.5 days following the surgical intervention had a better dispersion (100% sensitivity and 93% specificity), as indicated by an AUC (SE) of 0.878 (0.109) and P<0.05 (Table VI and Fig. 2).

In the present study, patients who underwent surgical procedures for BA with secondary detection had a more favorable outcome compared with those that presented with primary BA. In other words, patients who underwent surgery for a BA, EVD treatment, or a bilateral craniotomy had worse outcomes. In addition, the timing of IV treatment prior to the intervention and fever duration were independent outcome predictors. Notably, patients had a better outcome if the IV treatment commenced 21 days prior to the surgical intervention. Moreover, if the fever persisted for 2.5 days post-operatively, this was a good prognostic factor for patient outcomes.

BA constitutes a highly controversial and challenging entity, even in sophisticated healthcare facilities with ample resources, and is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates (2,3). A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory, as is long-term follow-up, particularly in environments with limited resources where the BA incidence is higher (8). However, although in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) BA accounts for 8% of all intercranial masses and this figure declines to only 2% for higher-middle-income countries (HMICs), primary BA in the child population is very common in LMICs, while in HMICs only sporadic cases have been reported (9). Another major difference between LMICs and HMICs is the surgical procedure, as in the former settings, the majority of cases are treated via burr hole aspiration (9).

Major procedures, such as craniotomy or craniectomy have been reported in a number of studies (10-13). In a previous cohort study, only one patient was treated via burr hole aspiration (10). According to the current guidelines, antimicrobials should be withheld until aspiration or the excision of BA in patients without severe disease if neurosurgery can be carried out within 24 h following the radiological diagnosis (10). In the patient sample in the present study, however, the surgical removal of the BA was usually preceded by antibiotic therapy, as the majority of the patients were referred to the clinic following an ENT (ear, nose and throat) consultation and had been receiving antimicrobial medication for days or weeks. Hakan et al (14) reported a significant association between a high fever (>38.5˚C) and mortality.

According to the available literature, a poor prognosis of patients with BA is more likely in immunocompromised patients, as well as in those with a history of diabetes and a low GCS score (7). In general, patients presenting with a lower GCS score have a poorer prognosis and often develop fatal complications (1,3). In the present study, there was no association between diabetes and GCS at the time of admission.

Despite the surgical management of BA, antibiotics are very efficient in both the early and late periods (1,3). The limited efficacy of antibiotics, mainly after the incapsulated stage, is due to the failure to achieve the sufficient therapeutic absorption of the antibiotic into the abscess cavity (1,3). On the other hand, the implications of long-term antibiotic use, such as increased liver and kidney burden, intestinal microbiome disorders, side-effects and effects on the immune system, constitute major concerns, particularly in patients with BA (1,3). In addition, antibiotic resistance, which is a global issue, enhances the susceptibility to secondary infections and has negative effects on the microbiota and health (1,3). Similar to all these reports, in the present study, management with antibiotics was one of the main parameters associated with favorable outcomes. More precisely, it was found that IV antibiotic administration 21 days prior to the surgical removal of the BA was related to improved outcomes.

In extant literature, fever is the most commonly reported symptom of BA (15). In the present study, a fever duration exceeding 2.5 days post-operatively was related to a poor response to treatment and thus with an unfavorable outcome.

The present study had several limitations that should be noted when interpreting the reported findings. The main limitation stems from its retrospective nature, which increased the risk of possible errors in collecting and interpreting the data from the clinical history, such as seizures or steroid administration. In addition, another limitation was that all patients were treated with IV antibiotics and there was no control group.

In conclusion, currently, BA is still considered a highly complex pathological entity with different pathophysiological aspects to be considered to treat their catastrophic sequelae. A multidisciplinary approach involving a combination of often multiple surgical procedures and a prolonged antibiotic administration may improve the functional outcomes of patients if the underlying pathology does not preclude this possibility. The present study revealed that patients who underwent surgical procedures for BA with secondary detection had a more favorable outcome compared with those with primary BA and a history of EVD treatment and/or bilateral craniotomies. In addition, it was found that the timing of IV treatment initiation prior to the intervention and fever duration could predict the outcomes of patients. Thus, patients had a better outcome if the IV treatment commenced 21 days prior to the surgical intervention. Moreover, if the fever persisted for not >2.5 days following the surgery, this was a good prognostic factor for patient outcomes.

Aspects that are still controversial and should be assessed further through high-quality studies include the following: The surgical approach for major craniotomies or DCs with full excision of BA or minimal image-guided stereotactic aspiration, the duration of IV antibiotic medication (6-8 weeks), when to switch to oral antibiotics, and for how long.