OL Oncology Letters 1792-1074 1792-1082 D.A. Spandidos 10.3892/ol.2025.14966 OL-29-5-14966 Articles Picropodophyllin, an IGF‑1 receptor inhibitor, enhances oxaliplatin efficacy in chemoresistant colorectal cancer HCT116 cells by reducing metastatic potential KayacikNurcin 1 KurterHasan 1 SeverTolga 1 BasbinarYasemin 2 Calibasi-KocalGizem 2 Department of Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340 Izmir, Turkey Department of Translational Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, 35340 Izmir, Turkey Correspondence to: Dr Gizem Calibasi-Kocal, Department of Translational Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, 56/13 Mithatpasa Caddesi, 35340 Izmir, Turkey, E-mail: gizem.calibasi@deu.edu.tr 05 2025 06 03 2025 29 5 220 24072024 05022025 Copyright: © 2025 Kayacik et al. 2025 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

The insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) axis drives cellular growth, survival and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer (CRC) by promoting proliferative signaling, anti-apoptotic effects and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Targeting the IGF-1R pathway is therefore a promising strategy, not only for overcoming drug resistance, but also for reducing migration and metastatic behavior related to EMT. The present study aimed to evaluate the potential of picropodophyllin (PPP), a selective IGF-1R inhibitor, to enhance the effects of oxaliplatin (OX) in HCT116 and OX-resistant HCT116-R cells. Cell viability was evaluated using a resazurin-based assay following 48-h combination treatment with OX at its IC50 concentrations (HCT116 cells, 53 µM and HCT116-R cells, 324 µM) and PPP (1 µM). Migration was assessed using wound healing assays, with images captured and analyzed at 0 and 48 h. Additionally, immunofluorescence staining was performed to assess E-cadherin and vimentin expression, evaluating epithelial and mesenchymal characteristics. In HCT116-R cells, the combination of OX (53 µM) and PPP significantly reduced cell viability by 0.65-fold compared with OX alone (P=0.0286). Wound healing assays demonstrated that combining PPP with OX (53 and 324 µM) significantly decreased migration, with 0.34-fold and 0.22-fold reductions, respectively (P<0.05). Immunofluorescence staining revealed that this combination also significantly increased E-cadherin expression, by 1.37- and 1.63-fold, respectively (P<0.05), indicating the role of PPP in enhancing epithelial characteristics and reducing EMT-related drug resistance. These findings highlight the potential for combining PPP with OX to enhance the cytotoxic and anti-metastatic effects of OX in chemo-resistant CRC cells, thus offering a promising strategy for overcoming drug resistance and improving patient outcomes in CRC treatment.

 colorectal cancer OX resistance IGF-1R picropodophyllin Dokuz Eylul University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit TYL-2022-2851 TUBITAK in the field of Biotechnological Pharmaceutical Technologies 1649B022204091 The present work was supported by the Dokuz Eylul University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (grant no. TYL-2022-2851). NK was supported by the TUBITAK in the field of Biotechnological Pharmaceutical Technologies (scholarship no. 1649B022204091). Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortalities worldwide. The conventional therapies of CRC start with surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapies, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy (1,2). Oxaliplatin (OX), one of the most used chemotherapeutic agents in CRC treatment, is a platinum-based antineoplastic agent that promotes apoptosis of tumor cells by blocking DNA replication and transcription processes. Empirical evidence indicates that resistance to OX commonly emerges during treatment, thereby undermining the efficacy of therapeutic interventions (3,4). The main causes for the progression of drug resistance depend on regulations of molecular mechanisms such as apoptosis, DNA damage repair, autophagy, drug uptake and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) (5). EMT is a biological process in which epithelial cells undergo a phenotypic transformation into a mesenchymal state, and this holds critical relevance in cancer progression, as neoplastic cells develop characteristics linked to increased aggressiveness and drug resistance, facilitating their dissemination (6). Previous studies have substantiated the pivotal involvement of several established signaling pathways, including TGF-β, PI3K/AKT, Ras/MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin, NF-κB and Notch, in orchestrating EMT. Thus, it is imperative to direct efforts toward identifying novel agents capable of reducing or inhibiting EMT and its concomitant role in fostering resistance to chemotherapy, including OX-based resistance (7–10). Therefore, one strategy for overcoming the progression of drug resistance is the targeting of EMT.

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 axis consists of IGF-1, IGF-2, their receptors [mainly IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R)] and binding proteins. IGF-1 binds to its receptor, IGF-1R, a receptor tyrosine kinase, which activates several downstream signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT, Ras/MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin and NF-κB pathways, all of which are crucial for cell survival, proliferation and EMT (11–13).

The IGF-1 axis serves a pivotal role in promoting EMT by activating key signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK. The activation of AKT stabilizes transcription factors such as Snail and Slug, which suppress epithelial markers and induce mesenchymal traits, thus enhancing cell survival and migration during EMT. Similarly, ERK activation contributes to EMT by promoting mesenchymal marker expression and further repressing E-cadherin, enhancing invasion and motility. The IGF-1 axis also interacts with pathways such as TGF-β and Wnt/β-catenin, amplifying EMT and driving more aggressive cancer behaviors (14,15). Given its central role in metastasis and therapy resistance, targeting the IGF-1 axis and related pathways offers potential for therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment (16).

The activation of the IGF-1 axis occurs when IGFs stimulate IGF-1R, which is overexpressed in several cancer types, including CRC, promoting cell cycle progression and inhibiting apoptosis (17–19). Several studies have demonstrated elevated IGF-1R expression in colon adenocarcinoma tissues compared with normal mucosa, linking this receptor to key cancer hallmarks, such as proliferation and survival. In the study by Shiratsuchi et al (20), 66% of patients with CRC displayed positive IGF-1R expression, which was markedly associated with tumor size and depth of invasion. Zhang et al (21) reported that IGF-1R gene expression was markedly higher in CRC samples compared with the adjacent normal tissues, and their analysis revealed a strong association between increased IGF-1R expression levels and key clinicopathological features of CRC, including cancer stage and metastasis. Furthermore, in murine models, overexpression of IGF-1R in HCT116/IGF-1R cells led to highly invasive tumors and distant metastases, such as parental cells (22). These findings indicate that IGF-1R inhibitors hold potential as therapeutic strategies to inhibit cancer progression, metastasis and EMT-related processes, as they target pathways such as PI3K/AKT, Ras/MAPK and Wnt/β-catenin, all of which are key factors in cancer development and drug resistance.

Studies investigating the effects of these inhibitors on colon cancer cells remain relatively limited, although several research efforts have focused on targeting the IGF signaling pathway using IGF-1R antagonists such as NVP-AEW541, BMS-754807, OSI-906 (linsitinib), picropodophyllin (PPP), AMG 479 (ganitumab) and MK-0646 (dalotuzumab). These studies underscore the potential therapeutic value of disrupting IGF-1R signaling in cancer treatment, suggesting that these inhibitors may serve a significant role in enhancing anticancer efficacy by inhibiting tumor growth and overcoming resistance mechanisms (12,23–30). For instance, NVP-AEW541, a small molecule IGF-1R inhibitor, was tested in CRC cell lines, such as SW480 and HT-29. The inhibitor effectively blocked IGF-1R signaling, reducing cancer cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis. Additionally, it increased sensitivity to chemotherapy agents, such as 5-fluorouracil, by disrupting critical survival pathways, namely PI3K/AKT and MAPK (23). Similarly, research by Pennarun et al (24,25) reported that inhibiting IGF-1R sensitized colon cancer cells to apoptosis mediated by death receptor 5, enhancing apoptotic signaling and reducing cell survival through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Similarly, BMS-754807, a dual IGF-1R/insulin receptor inhibitor, was reported to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in CRC cell lines, such as HCT-116 (26,27). Its combination with cetuximab enhanced anticancer effects, showing greater inhibition of cell growth (26). OSI-906 has also demonstrated strong inhibition of IGF-1R signaling, leading to reduced tumor growth and increased apoptosis in both in vitro and in vivo models (27). Furthermore, MK-0646 (dalotuzumab) combined with OSI-906 has shown enhanced efficacy in CRC xenograft models by reducing cell proliferation and tumor growth (28).

PPP, a selective inhibitor of IGF-1R, has shown promising anticancer effects in several studies on CRC. In the study by Lee et al (29), PPP was tested on HCT-116 CRC cells, where it induced G1 phase cell cycle arrest and triggered apoptosis through reactive oxygen species generation. Additionally, PPP activated the p38 MAPK signaling pathway, contributing to its anticancer effects. Similarly, in the study by Sipos et al (30), PPP inhibited IGF-1R, leading to the disruption of toll-like receptor 9 signaling and autophagy, which reduced the survival of HT-29 CRC cells. Moreover, Feng et al (12) reported that PPP, whether used as a standalone treatment or in combination with other therapies, blocked IGF-1R signaling, reducing cell viability and inducing apoptosis in colon cancer cells. These findings underscore the potential of PPP as a therapeutic agent for treating CRC by targeting key survival and proliferation pathways.

There is limited literature on enhancing chemotherapy responses through IGF-1R inhibition in chemotherapy-resistant CRC cells. However, a study by Codony-Servat et al (31) reported that chemotherapy application increased IGF-1R expression, which was notably elevated in OX-resistant cells. These findings suggest that IGF-1R may serve a critical role in the development of chemotherapy resistance and that targeting IGF-1R could be a potential strategy for enhancing treatment efficacy in resistant CRC cells.

Due to the marked involvement of the IGF axis in both drug resistance and EMT, and in EMT-associated drug resistance, blocking IGF-1 signaling may reduce EMT-based phenotypes and resensitize tumors to therapy. However, there is a scarcity of studies investigating agents targeting IGF-1R to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant cancers (32–34). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a more effective treatment strategy for OX-resistant CRC by combining PPP, an IGF-1R inhibitor, with OX. The rationale for this approach was based on the notable role that the IGF-1 axis serves in cancer progression, metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy, particularly through its involvement in EMT and EMT-associated drug resistance.

 Materials and methods <sec> <title>Cell culture

Colorectal carcinoma HCT-116 cells (CCL-247; American Type Culture Collection) and OX-resistant colorectal carcinoma cells (named as HCT116-R), were cultured in DMEM (Cegrogen Biotech GmbH) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Cegrogen Biotech GmbH), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Cegrogen Biotech GmbH) and incubated at 5% CO2 and 37°C in a humidified incubator. To generate OX-resistant HCT-116-R cells, parental HCT-116 cells were exposed to gradually increasing concentrations of OX (cat. no. O9512; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) (1–52 µM), over a 6-month period, established as described in our recent study (10). During the resistance development process, to maintain the balance between proliferation and cell death, cells were cultured in culture media supplemented with gradually increasing doses of OX (1–52 µM) at 5% CO2 and 37°C in a humidified incubator. After each OX treatment, the cells were maintained in drug-free culture media for 1–2 days to allow recovery and support the development of resistance. The characterization of resistance was confirmed by the higher IC50 value of the resistant cells compared with that of the parental cells, along with an increased expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin in the resistant cells relative to the parental cells as assessed by immunofluorescence staining (10).

 Cell viability assay

Resazurin, a cell-permeable blue dye, was utilized as a redox indicator to assess cell viability and evaluate the effects of treatment conditions on the HCT116 and HCT116-R cells (10,35,36). Viable cells with active metabolism reduce resazurin to red fluorescent resorufin through the action of mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzymes (35). To determine cell viability, resazurin salt (cat. no. 14322; Cayman Chemical Company) diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Cegrogen Biotech GmbH) was added to the culture medium of cells treated with OX and/or PPP (cat. no. S7668; Selleck Chemicals) (1 µM) for 48 h at 37°C. The cells were then incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Fluorescence changes in the medium were measured using a microplate reader (Ex/Em 570/580 nm; Varioskan™ LUX Multimode Microplate Reader; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The viability of the control group was set to 100%, and the viability of treated groups was calculated relative to the control.

 Determination of OX and PPP concentrations

OX was prepared by dissolving it in saline to a concentration of 5 mg/ml and stored at 4°C. PPP was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (cat. no. D4540; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) to a final concentration of 82 mg/ml, and stored at −80°C.

In the context of the present study, the combination of PPP and OX involved the determination of the non-toxic maximal concentration of PPP and IC50 of OX in both parental and OX-resistant CRC cells. For IC50 determination, HCT116 cells were treated with varying concentrations of OX at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96 and 192 µM at 37°C (33–35). Meanwhile HCT116-R cells were exposed to OX at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 and 700 µM for 48 h at 37°C (37–39). To determine the non-toxic highest concentration for PPP, cells were exposed to concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 µM PPP for 48 h at 37°C (40–42). To assess the effect of PPP on enhancing OX sensitivity, OX and PPP were used as single agents and in combination in both HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. The experimental design involved treating both HCT116 parental and HCT116-R OX-resistant CRC cells with OX and/or PPP at varying concentrations. For the HCT116 parental cells, the treatment groups included a Control (untreated), 53 µM OX alone, 1 µM PP alone, and a combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP. In the HCT116-R OX-resistant cells, the groups consisted of a Control (untreated), 53 µM OX alone, a combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP, 1 µM PPP alone, 324 µM OX alone, and a combination of 324 µM OX + 1 µM PPP.

To evaluate the potential of enhancing chemotherapy efficacy through the use of lower doses of OX in the presence of PPP, combination studies were performed in OX-resistant HCT116-R cells, using both the OX IC50 value determined for resistant cells (324 µM), and the OX IC50 value determined for parental HCT116 cells (53 µM) in combination with PPP (1 µM). The aim of this strategy was to provide insights into the ability of PPP to increase sensitivity to OX, potentially enabling the use of lower chemotherapy doses and thereby reducing treatment-related side effects.

 Wound healing analysis

A wound-healing model was used to assess the migratory capacities of HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. Once the seeded cells reached 80–90% confluence in 24-well plates, a scratch was generated in the center of the well using a pipette tip. After washing with PBS, HCT116 and HCT116-R cells were treated with one of the following: 1 µM PPP, OX (53 or 324 µM), or a combination of OX (53 or 324 µM) + PPP (1 µM). Subsequently, the migration of cells on either side of the scratch into the open space was monitored under an inverted light microscope (Axio Vert.A1; Zeiss GmbH) at 0 and 48 h (12). Cells were serum-starved throughout the assay. Wound closure was quantified using Image J Software version 1.53 (National Institutes of Health). The wound area at each time point was measured by manually outlining the scratch boundaries using the freehand selection tool in ImageJ (version 1.54h; National Institutes of Health), and the open wound area was quantified in mm after setting the appropriate scale using the 50 µm scale bar present in the original wound healing images. The percentage of wound closure was calculated using the following formula: % Wound closure=[Wound opening (t0) - Wound opening (tx)*]/Wound opening (t0) ×100, where * refers to 48 h.

 Immunofluorescence staining for epithelial-mesenchymal markers

Immunofluorescence staining was used to assess the EMT specific E-cadherin (epithelial) and vimentin (mesenchymal) markers on HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. The seeded cells treated with 1 µM PPP, OX (53 or 324 µM), or a combination of OX (53 or 324 µM) + PPP (1 µM) for 48 h at 37°C. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at room temperature for 20 min, the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) solution in 1X PBS for 5 min at room temperature. To prevent non-specific antibody binding, the cells were blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (cat. no. D0050-4090; Cegrogen Biotech) in 1X PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Permeabilized cells were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against E-cadherin (cat. no. 14472S; 1:250; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and vimentin (cat. no. NB300-223; 1:250; Novus Biologicals, LLC; Bio-Techne) in the staining buffer (1% BSA diluted in 1X PBS). The cells were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with secondary antibodies, including Alexa Fluor™-488-goat anti-mouse (cat. no. ab150171; 1:1,000; Abcam) and Alexa Fluor-647 goat anti-chicken (cat. no. 4408S; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) in PBS. Subsequently, the cells were washed with 1X PBS and incubated for 10 min at room temperature with nucleus stain DAPI (1:1,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The stained cells were observed using a confocal microscope (Zeiss, LSM 800 Confocal, USA), and fluorescence intensities were analyzed with the accompanying microscope software [Zen 2.1 (Blue Edition); Zeiss AG].

 Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed with ≥3 biological and technical replicates. The collected data was subjected to comprehensive analysis and visualization using GraphPad Prism Version 10.3.1 (Dotmatics). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance between two experimental groups was determined using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, whilst multiple comparisons were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test followed by Bonferroni's correction. The use of this nonparametric test was justified by assessing data normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, which confirmed that the data did not follow a normal distribution. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

 Results <sec> <title>Established concentrations for OX, PPP and combined therapy

The collected data revealed that the IC50 values of OX for HCT116 (Fig. 1A) and HCT116-R (Fig. 1B) cells were 53 and 324 µM, respectively. Furthermore, to evaluate the potential alteration of OX efficacy without interference from PPP on cell viability, the highest non-toxic highest concentration of PPP was determined for both HCT116 (Fig. 1C) and HCT116-R cells (Fig. 1D) by applying PPP at a concentration range of 1–7 µM. PPP treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in cell viability in both HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. In HCT116 cells, no significant difference was observed between the control and 1 µM PPP groups (P>0.999). However, a significant decrease in cell viability was demonstrated at 2 µM (P=0.0373), 3 µM (P=0.0385), 4 µM (P=0.0137), 5 µM (P=0.0200), 6 µM (P=0.0072) and 7 µM (P=0.0018), compared with the control. Similarly, in HCT116-R cells, 1 µM PPP did not induce a significant change (P>0.999), whilst a significant reduction in cell viability was demonstrated at 2 µM (P=0.049), 3 µM (P=0.0060), 4 µM (P=0.0127), 5 µM (P=0.0012), 6 µM (P=0.0012) and 7 µM (P=0.0027). These results suggest a dose-dependent effect of PPP on both HCT116 and HCT116-R cells, with cytotoxicity observed at concentrations of ≥2 µM when each PPP concentration group was compared separately with the control group. Therefore, the highest non-toxic concentration for PPP was determined to be 1 µM, which was used in combination with OX in subsequent experiments.

 PPP potentiates OX sensitivity in resistant CRC cells

To assess the effect of PPP (1 µM) on enhancing OX sensitivity, the determined OX IC50 value (53 µM) in HCT116 parental cells was used in combination therapy. Additionally, two different combination strategies were applied in OX-resistant HCT116-R cells. First, the OX IC50 dose (324 µM) for HCT116-R cells was combined with 1 µM PPP in resistant cells. Second, to assess the effect of 1 µM PPP at lower OX concentrations, the combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP was also evaluated. The aim of this approach was to provide insight into the potential of using lower doses of OX in the presence of PPP to enhance chemotherapy efficacy, and the findings suggest a treatment strategy that could improve the effectiveness of low-dose chemotherapy whilst reducing side effects.

The combined treatment of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP in HCT116 cells was associated with a reduction in cell viability compared with 53 µM OX treatment alone (P=0.0286; Fig. 1E). Moreover, treatment of HCT116-R cells with 53 µM OX demonstrated a marked reduction in cell viability compared with the group treated with 53 µM OX alone (0.65-fold decrease; P=0.029; Fig. 1F). In HCT116 cells, the combined treatment of 324 µM OX + 1 µM PPP also showed a similar trend of reduced viability compared with 324 µM OX alone, indicating the potential sensitizing effect of 1 µM PPP on OX treatment, although statistical significance was not reached (P>0.05; Fig. 1F).

 PPP attenuates migration in resistant CRC cells

Wound healing assays were performed to assess the migration of HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. In HCT116 cells, wound closure (migration rate) was 20.4±12.57% in the control group, 23.98±7.11% in the OX (53 µM) group, 10.80±8.30% in the PPP (1 µM) group and 13.89±11.42% in the 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP group (Fig. 2A and B). The PPP (1 µM) group showed a significant reduction in wound closure compared with that in the control group (P=0.020), demonstrating that PPP (1 µM) alone could limit cell migration. In the 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP group, wound closure was decreased further compared with OX alone, indicating that the combination more effectively impaired migration; however, this reduction was not statistically significant (P=0.200).

In HCT116-R cells, wound closure in the control, PPP (1 µM), OX (53 µM), 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP, OX (324 µM) and 324 µM OX + 1 µM PPP groups were determined to be 21.17±2.21, 10.22±4.49, 35.64±11.74, 12.35±5.37, 27.27±12 and 6.05±2.69%, respectively (Fig. 2C and D). PPP (1 µM) alone significantly reduced migration in comparison with the control group, indicating its effectiveness in limiting migration in resistant cells (P=0.028). The combination treatment, 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP, further significantly decreased the migration rate in comparison with OX (53 µM) alone (0.34-fold decrease; P=0.029). Moreover, the combination of 324 µM + 1 µM PPP resulted in a significantly lower wound closure percentage compared with OX (324 µM) alone, highlighting the greater degree of migration reduction achieved using the combination therapy (0.22-fold decrease; P=0.028). Overall, the combination of OX (53 µM or 324 µM) and PPP (1 µM) reduced the migration rate of HCT116-R cells compared with OX (52 µM or 324 µM) alone (P<0.05), indicating that PPP effectively impairs the migration of OX-resistant cells, even at different concentrations of OX, making it a promising adjunct in overcoming the migration of OX-resistant CRC cells.

 PPP preserves the epithelial phenotype against the mesenchymal phenotype in resistant CRC cells

Immunofluorescence staining was performed on HCT116 and HCT116-R cells to evaluate the expression levels of epithelial biomarker E-cadherin and the mesenchymal biomarker vimentin following single and combination treatments.

The fluorescence intensity of E-cadherin in HCT116 cells was significantly increased in the combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP group compared with that in the OX (53 µM) group alone (P<0.001), suggesting a synergistic effect of the combination treatment in promoting epithelial characteristics. The PPP (1 µM) group also demonstrated significantly increased fluorescence intensity for E-cadherin expression compared with the control (P<0.001) (Fig. 3A and B). Furthermore, the combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP revealed a slight but statistically insignificant increase in the fluorescence intensity of vimentin levels compared with OX (53 µM) treatment alone (P>0.05). Treatment with PPP (1 µM) also slightly increased vimentin levels compared with the control, but the change was not statistically significant (P>0.05) (Fig. 3C).

In HCT116-R cells, the 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in E-cadherin levels compared with the OX (53 µM) group alone (1.37-fold increase; P=0.0104). This indicates the ability of PPP to enhance epithelial marker expression in resistant cells even with low doses of OX (Fig. 3D and E). The 324 µM OX + 1 µM PPP group also demonstrated a significant increase in E-cadherin expression compared with the OX (324 µM) group alone (1.63-fold increase; P=0.001). This result suggests that PPP (1 µM) can enhance the ability of OX to induce epithelial features in resistant cells at a higher dose of OX. The PPP (1 µM) group also revealed significantly increased fluorescence intensity for E-cadherin expression compared with the control group (P<0.001). However, the fluorescence intensity of vimentin in HCT116-R cells demonstrated no significant differences between the following groups: Control and PPP; OX (53 µM) and 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP; and OX (324 µM) and 324 µM OX + 1 µM PPP (P>0.05). The expression levels of vimentin remained consistent across all treatment groups, suggesting that PPP does not affect its expression in the presence or absence of OX in HCT116-R cells (Fig. 3F).

The aforementioned findings suggest that PPP induces an enhancement in epithelial characteristics in both HCT116 and HCT116-R cells and supports the potential use of PPP (1 µM) to improve the efficacy of OX in CRC treatment.

 Discussion

Despite advancements in novel treatments, OX-based chemotherapy combinations continue to serve a key role in CRC treatment. The major issue in the OX treatment of CRC is acquired resistance. The IGF-1R signaling axis serves a critical role in the proliferation and growth of tumor cells in an EMT-based metastatic phenotype. Different studies have reported that IGF-1 production and IGF-1R expression can inhibit cell death and cause drug resistance by upregulating survival protein in cancers. As EMT serves a crucial role in acquired resistance, there is an increasing trend towards agents that increase treatment sensitivity by targeting EMT inhibition (16,43–45). In line with this, the present study aimed to propose a novel combination strategy using an IGF-1R inhibitor with the aspect of proliferation, drug resistance and EMT-supportive IGF-1R signaling, to increase the chemotherapeutic efficacy of OX-resistant CRC. Based on the results, the present study aimed to propose a more effective treatment strategy by using PPP in combination with OX to reduce the proliferative and EMT-based aggressive phenotype of OX-resistant CRC cells. We hypothesized that, by targeting IGF-1R, PPP may inhibit the proliferation and EMT-driven aggressiveness of OX-resistant CRC cells, thus re-sensitizing the tumors to chemotherapy and enhancing treatment efficacy. This dual approach seeks to overcome chemotherapy resistance, which is a major obstacle in CRC treatment, by attacking both survival and drug resistance pathways.

IGF-1R proteins have emerged as important targets for cancer therapy. Previous studies have been performed with IGF-1R-targeted agents such as NVP-AEW541, OSI-906 (linsitinib), PPP, AMG 479 (ganitumab) and MK-0646 (dalotuzumab) in several human cancers, showing that these compounds can inhibit tumor cell growth and induce apoptosis (12,23–30). However, the substantial role of the IGF axis in both drug resistance and the EMT has led to a notable lack of studies exploring agents that target the IGF-1R to augment the effectiveness of chemotherapy in chemotherapy-resistant cancers (32–34,46). Therefore, the present study specifically focused on assessing the impact of PPP in combination with OX to enhance drug sensitivity and attenuate the drug resistance-promoting EMT phenotype in OX-resistant CRC cells.

Initially, the aim of the present study was to determine the highest non-toxic dose of PPP to prevent any PPP-induced cytotoxicity when utilized in combination with OX, forming part of the combination therapeutic strategy. Feng et al (12) investigated the anticancer effect of PPP in colon carcinoma cell lines and reported a net reduction in viable cells when treated with PPP at concentrations ≥1 µM. Another study by Wang et al (41) investigated the therapeutic response of PPP in colorectal carcinoma, and reported that PPP markedly suppressed the growth of CRC cells at a concentration of 1 µM. The analysis in the present study demonstrated that 2 µM PPP affected cell viability, therefore 1 µM PPP was considered as the highest possible concentration that had no cytotoxic effect on CRC cell lines. Furthermore, the present study used the maximum non-toxic concentration of PPP in combination with OX to enhance OX sensitivity and overcome OX-resistance. In the present study, cytotoxic effects were observed at concentrations >1 µM which is consistent with previous studies that reported a reduction in cell viability at concentrations ≥1 µM (12,14). These findings suggested that PPP begins to exhibit cytotoxic effects at concentrations ≥1 µM.

Although OX is a standard treatment option in CRC, it leads to toxicity (especially peripheral neurotoxicity), a serious dose-limiting problem in the clinic. Due to the OX-related side effects and toxicities, the treatment may need to be interrupted before remission can be achieved (47). Therefore, the dosage should be decreased for OX to prevent other toxicities in healthy tissue, but this decrease will affect other parameters, the most crucial being the treatment capacity. Therefore, PPP could be used as an adjuvant agent at its nontoxic concentration to enhance the treatment effect of OX and provide high efficacy in low dosages by avoiding OX-related healthy tissue toxicities in patients with CRC.

To evaluate the impact of PPP on enhancing sensitivity to OX in CRC, the present study used the IC50 value of OX (53 µM) in HCT116 parental cells for combination therapy. In OX-resistant HCT116-R cells, two different combination strategies were tested. First, the IC50 dose of OX for resistant cells (324 µM) was combined with PPP (1 µM) to assess the potential of overcoming resistance. Second, to assess the effect of PPP (1 µM) at lower OX concentrations, OX was tested at the lower parental IC50 value (53 µM) in combination with PPP (1 µM). This latter approach aimed to explore whether PPP (1 µM) could enhance OX efficacy at lower drug concentrations, potentially improving treatment outcomes while minimizing side effects. The results of this strategy offer a promising avenue for reducing chemotherapy dosages, minimizing toxicity, whilst maintaining or enhancing therapeutic efficacy in resistant cancer cells.

The results of the present study demonstrate that PPP significantly enhances the cytotoxic effects of OX in both HCT116 and OX-resistant HCT116-R CRC cells. In non-resistant HCT116 cells, the combination of 53 µM OX + 1 µM PPP led to a statistically significant decrease in cell viability compared with OX alone. Similarly, in resistant HCT116-R cells, the same combination further reduced cell viability, indicating that PPP improves sensitivity to OX. Whilst the higher concentration of OX (324 µM) combined with PPP (1 µM) showed a trend toward greater cytotoxicity in resistant cells, this difference was not statistically significant. Overall, PPP appeared to enhance the effectiveness of OX, particularly at lower doses.

The results of the current study, namely, that PPP enhances the cytotoxic effects of OX, are consistent with prior research highlighting the therapeutic potential of PPP. PPP has been widely recognized for its role as a selective IGF-1R inhibitor, effectively disrupting cancer cell survival pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways, which are often upregulated in chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells. Feng et al (12) demonstrated that PPP effectively inhibits IGF-1R signaling, leading to reduced viability and increased apoptosis in colon cancer cells, both as a standalone treatment and in combination with other therapies. Similar to the findings of the present study, Lee et al (29) reported that PPP enhances the anticancer effects of chemotherapeutic agents by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation in CRC cells, further supporting the synergistic effect observed in the combination of OX and PPP. Moreover, the finding that PPP increases OX sensitivity at both lower (53 µM) and higher (324 µM) concentrations aligns with study by Sipos et al (30) showing that PPP can overcome drug resistance mechanisms, particularly in cells exhibiting an EMT phenotype, which is closely associated with chemotherapy resistance. The previous study demonstrated that PPP disrupts EMT signaling and autophagy, reducing the survival of chemo-resistant CRC cells, further supporting the potential role of PPP in combination therapies targeting drug-resistant cancers.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies specifically addressing the combination of PPP with chemotherapy in CRC, but a limited number of studies focus on combination therapies involving PPP in other types of cancer. Tarnowski et al (40) evaluated the effects of PPP in combination with actinomycin-D and cisplatin in rhabdomyosarcoma cells and demonstrated that PPP increased the sensitivity to chemotherapy. Moreover, in another study by Duan et al (48), PPP was reported to enhance the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin in osteosarcoma cell lines that had developed resistance to doxorubicin. In addition, downregulation of IGF-1R expression in drug-resistant cell lines by small interfering RNA led to the restoration of sensitivity to doxorubicin (48). Therefore, PPP holds promise as a potent adjunct to OX in treating chemo-resistant CRC, potentially improving patient outcomes by sensitizing tumors to lower doses of chemotherapy, reducing both drug toxicity and resistance (27,49).

The wound healing assays in the present study demonstrated that PPP effectively reduces the migration of both HCT116 and OX-resistant HCT116-R CRC cells. The findings, demonstrating that PPP was associated with a significant reduction in the migration of both types of CRC cells, align with earlier research that highlights the ability of PPP to impair cancer cell migration and metastasis. For example, Feng et al (12) reported that PPP reduced the migration of HCT116 cells in a dose-dependent manner. This is consistent with the results of the present study, where PPP reduced migration in combination with OX, especially in resistant cells. Additionally, whilst the combination of PPP and OX (53 µM) led to a reduction in migration in HCT116 cells compared with OX alone, this decrease did not reach statistical significance. By contrast, the combination of PPP with either low-dose OX (53 µM) or high-dose OX (324 µM) led to a statistically significant reduction in migration in HCT116-R cells, compared with OX alone (P<0.05). This suggests that PPP not only enhances the cytotoxic effects of OX, but also significantly reduces the migratory potential of OX-resistant CRC cells, making it a promising adjunct for overcoming their migratory capacity. The observed differences in the effects of the combinatorial use of PPP with OX on HCT116 and HCT116-R cells may be attributed to two main factors. Firstly, the wound healing assay used in the present study may lack the sensitivity to detect subtle changes in migration, particularly in non-resistant HCT116 cells, where the migration rate might not be significantly altered by PPP and OX under these specific experimental conditions. Secondly, biological mechanisms likely serve a role in these differences. Non-resistant HCT116 cells may lack EMT-related changes, which are commonly associated with increased migration and invasiveness (50). By contrast, HCT116-R cells, which are resistant to OX, exhibit significant differences in migration, suggesting the involvement of EMT or other resistance-associated mechanisms in driving migration. These findings highlight the distinct biological and functional characteristics of resistant and non-resistant cell populations and underscore the potential of PPP in targeting migration in chemo-resistant cancer cells.

The paradoxical finding that OX alone increased the migration of resistant cells, potentially through mechanisms related to EMT, is supported by previous studies. EMT is often linked to increased cell migration and metastasis, particularly in chemo-resistant cancers, where it enhances the invasiveness of tumor cells (50–52). Previous studies have demonstrated that IGF-1R inhibition, as achieved through PPP, can suppress EMT and reduce the metastatic potential of cancer cells (29). This reversal of OX-induced migration by PPP in resistant cells further underscores its potential role as an adjunct therapy to prevent metastasis-related phenotypes in OX-resistant CRC. Moreover, similar findings from Sipos et al (30) reinforce the hypothesis that PPP can disrupt EMT processes by targeting IGF-1R signaling, thereby reducing drug resistance and metastatic behavior in cancer cells. By targeting these pathways, PPP not only enhances the cytotoxicity of OX but also limits the metastatic potential, making it a promising approach for overcoming the dual challenges of drug resistance and metastasis in CRC treatment.

The immunofluorescence results of the present study, which demonstrated that PPP preserved the epithelial phenotype in both HCT116 and OX-resistant HCT116-R CRC cells by promoting E-cadherin expression, align with prior research that highlights the ability of PPP to influence EMT markers. In the present study, PPP was demonstrated to significantly increase E-cadherin levels, an important epithelial marker, without significantly affecting the mesenchymal marker vimentin, particularly when combined with OX. These findings are consistent with reports by Lee et al (29) and Feng et al (12), who reported that PPP not only induces apoptosis, but also inhibits key EMT markers, thereby promoting epithelial traits in cancer cells.

Previous studies have also reported that EMT is a critical mechanism by which cancer cells acquire drug resistance and increased metastatic potential (14). Sipos et al (30) reported that targeting the IGF-1R pathway with PPP disrupted EMT signaling, reinforcing epithelial characteristics such as E-cadherin expression, which corresponds with the findings of the present study. The ability of PPP to promote E-cadherin expression in both non-resistant and resistant cell lines suggests that it could serve a vital role in combating chemoresistance by inhibiting EMT, a key process involved in drug resistance and metastasis. Additionally, Zhang et al (21) reported that IGF-1R serves a pivotal role in maintaining EMT traits, contributing to the aggressive and resistant nature of CRC cells. The findings of the present study, where PPP enhances E-cadherin expression without significantly affecting vimentin, further support the notion that targeting IGF-1R with PPP could potentially reverse EMT-associated resistance and enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In congruence with these outcomes, Li et al (16,46) aimed to enhance the drug sensitivity of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells through the inhibition of insulin-such as growth factor 1 receptor via PPP. The study reported a diminution in mesenchymal markers including Snail, Slug, zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 and Vimentin, and an elevation in the epithelial marker E-cadherin following treatment with PPP.

The combination treatment of 53 µM OX + and 1 µM PPP in parental HCT116 cells resulted in a slight, statistically non-significant increase in vimentin fluorescence intensity compared with OX treatment alone, whilst PPP (1 µM) alone also led to a modest, non-significant increase relative to the control. These findings may reflect inherent biological variability and the limitations of a small sample size, potentially contributing to the lack of statistical significance. Additionally, it is possible that PPP may interact with alternative signaling pathways or compensatory mechanisms, such as stress responses or overlapping EMT pathways (such as, TGF-β/Smad and Wnt/β-catenin), which could sustain or slightly enhance vimentin expression. Moreover, specific genetic or epigenetic characteristics of the HCT116 cell line may influence vimentin expression, making it less responsive to PPP. In HCT116-R cells, vimentin fluorescence intensity did not demonstrate significant changes across treatment groups, including PPP, OX and their combinations. This lack of response may indicate the possibility of intrinsic resistance in HCT116-R cells, potentially involving a stabilized EMT phenotype or constitutive activation of EMT pathways. Additionally, the doses of PPP and OX used may not have been optimal for modulating vimentin expression, and cellular heterogeneity or other regulatory mechanisms could contribute to the observed outcomes. In summary, the preservation of epithelial markers such as E-cadherin and the lack of significant changes in mesenchymal traits such as vimentin upon PPP treatment, particularly in combination with OX, suggest that PPP could be an influential adjunct to chemotherapy by mitigating EMT-associated drug resistance in CRC.

In concordance with analogous results from the literature, the data from the present study indicate that PPP markedly augments therapeutic efficacy in CRC by potentially counteracting mechanisms of drug resistance. This underscores the need for an innovative dual therapy strategy for the management of OX-resistant CRC. The use of PPP in the treatment protocol is an innovative strategy aimed at increasing the chemotherapy efficacy of OX. This strategy aims to reverse the mesenchymal properties of cancer cells by sensitizing them to OX. The proposed dual therapy not only addresses the OX resistance in CRC but also offers a promising way to improve the overall efficacy of chemotherapy in this context.

However, the present study has several limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the experiments were performed solely on in vitro models using two CRC cell lines, HCT116 and OX-resistant HCT116-R. This approach may not fully capture the complexity and heterogeneity of tumors in in vivo conditions. Moreover, there was no attempt to account for the tumor microenvironment, which can notably influence drug resistance and response (53,54). Additionally, there is a need to further explore the long-term effects of PPP on cell behavior and the molecular mechanisms underlying its action, particularly regarding EMT and IGF-1R signaling. Furthermore, vimentin may not be a primary marker affected by PPP, which could instead predominantly target other mesenchymal markers such as N-cadherin. Evaluating additional EMT markers and increasing sample sizes are crucial to better understand the broader effects of PPP on EMT regulation. Future studies should include IGF-1R knockdown and overexpression experiments to improve the understanding of the role of this pathway in OX resistance. These experiments could provide deeper insights into how IGF-1R signaling influences cancer cell survival, migration and EMT. Additionally, future studies should include in vivo models and a broader range of CRC subtypes to better understand the efficacy of PPP in overcoming OX resistance. Detailed mechanistic studies are also needed to provide a clearer picture of how PPP modulates cancer cell survival, migration and resistance pathways.

In summary, PPP has emerged as a promising adjunctive agent to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of OX in CRC. The present study highlights potential avenues for future research, particularly in exploring novel treatment modalities. Specifically, integrating EMT suppressive agents with conventional chemotherapeutic approaches could further improve treatment effectiveness. However, due to the complex and multifactorial nature of CRC, numerous therapeutic targets remain to be explored for optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, it is essential to identify next-generation drug targets and refine current treatment protocols to develop comprehensive therapeutic strategies aligned that address the intricate pathogenesis of CRC.

 Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Hulya Ellidokuz and Dr Mehmet Emin Arayici (Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey) for their support in statistical analysis, including data normalization assessment and selection of appropriate statistical tests.

 Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.

 Authors' contributions

NK, YB and GCK contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. NK, HK, TS and GCK were responsible for data acquisition and analysis, while NK, HK, TS, YB and GCK contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in drafting the manuscript and critically reviewing the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for the accuracy and integrity of the work. NK, YB and GCK confirm the authenticity of all raw data.

 Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present research, performed as a Master of Science thesis, was approved by the Dokuz Eylül University Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (14.07.2021; approval no. 2021/21-13). Obtaining ethical approval is mandatory for all thesis studies performed under the Dokuz Eylül University Institute of Health Sciences. The present study did not involve the use of human or animal materials, and all necessary institutional permissions and ethical committee approvals were obtained.

 Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

 Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

 Abbreviations IGF

insulin-like growth factor

 IGF-1R

IGF-1 receptor

 PPP

picropodophyllin

 OX

oxaliplatin

 EMT

epithelial-mesenchymal transition

 References HammondWASwaikaAModyKPharmacologic resistance in colorectal cancer: A reviewTher Adv Med Oncol85784201610.1177/175883401561453026753006 BillerLHSchragDDiagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A reviewJAMA325669685202110.1001/jama.2021.602733591350 LiYGanYLiuJLiJZhouZTianRSunRLiuJXiaoQLiYDownregulation of MEIS1 mediated by ELFN1-AS1/EZH2/DNMT3a axis promotes tumorigenesis and oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancerSignal Transduct Target Ther787202210.1038/s41392-022-00902-635351858 JinQFengJYanYKuangYPrognostic and immunological role of adaptor related protein complex 3 subunit mu2 in colon cancerSci Rep14483202410.1038/s41598-023-50452-238177168 HashemiMEsbatiNRashidiMGholamiSRaesiRBidokiSSGoharriziMASBMotlaghYSMKhorramiRTavakolpournegariABiological landscape and nanostructural view in development and reversal of oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancerTransl Oncol40101846202410.1016/j.tranon.2023.10184638042134 LuJKornmannMTraubBRole of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancerInt J Mol Sci2414815202310.3390/ijms24191481537834263 HoKHChenPHShihCMLeeYTChengCHLiuAJLeeCCChenKCmiR-4286 is involved in connections between IGF-1 and TGF-β signaling for the mesenchymal transition and invasion by glioblastomasCell Mol Neurobiol42791806202210.1007/s10571-020-00977-133025417 SabbahMEmamiSRedeuilhGJulienSPrévostGZimberAOuelaaRBrackeMDe WeverOGespachCMolecular signature and therapeutic perspective of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in epithelial cancersDrug Resist Updat11123151200810.1016/j.drup.2008.07.00118718806 NgoMTPengSWKuoYCLinCYWuMHChuangCHKaoCXJengHYLinGWLingTYA yes-associated protein (YAP) and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling loop is involved in sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinomaCancers (Basel)133812202110.3390/cancers1315381234359714 KurterHBasbinarYEllidokuzHCalibasi-KocalGThe Role of Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in modulating oxaliplatin resistance by reversing mesenchymal phenotype in colorectal cancerNutrients154705202310.3390/nu1522470538004099 HosseiniSAZandHCheraghpourMThe influence of curcumin on the downregulation of MYC, insulin and IGF-1 receptors: A possible mechanism underlying the anti-growth and anti-migration in chemoresistant colorectal cancer cellsMedicina (Kaunas)5590201910.3390/medicina5504009030987250 FengXAleemELinYAxelsonMLarssonOStrömbergTMultiple antitumor effects of picropodophyllin in colon carcinoma cell lines: Clinical implicationsInt J Oncol4012511258201210.3892/ijo.2011.128122159423 PollakMThe insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: An updateNat Rev Cancer12159169201210.1038/nrc321522337149 NietoMAHuangRYJacksonRAThieryJPEMT: 2016Cell1662145201610.1016/j.cell.2016.06.02827368099 IanzaASiricoMBernocchiOGeneraliDRole of the IGF-1 axis in overcoming resistance in breast cancerFront Cell Dev Biol9641449202110.3389/fcell.2021.64144933829018 LiHBatthISQuXXuLSongNWangRLiuYIGF-IR signaling in epithelial to mesenchymal transition and targeting IGF-IR therapy: Overview and new insightsMol Cancer166201710.1186/s12943-016-0576-528137302 FreierSWeissOEranMFlyvbjergADahanRNepheshISafraTShiloniERazIExpression of the insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in adenocarcinoma of the colonGut44704708199910.1136/gut.44.5.70410205209 NoshoKYamamotoHTaniguchiHAdachiYYoshidaYArimuraYEndoTHinodaYImaiKInterplay of insulin-like growth factor-II, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-I receptor, COX-2, and matrix metalloproteinase-7, play key roles in the early stage of colorectal carcinogenesisClin Cancer Res1079507957200410.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-087515585629 YamamotoNOshimaTYoshiharaKAoyamaTHayashiTYamadaTSatoTShiozawaMYoshikawaTMorinagaSClinicopathological significance and impact on outcomes of the gene expression levels of IGF−1, IGF−2 and IGF-1R, IGFBP−3 in patients with colorectal cancer: Overexpression of the IGFBP−3 gene is an effective predictor of outcomes in patients with colorectal cancerOncol Lett1339583966201710.3892/ol.2017.593628521493 ShiratsuchiIAkagiYKawaharaAKinugasaTRomeoKYoshidaTRyuYGotandaYKageMShirouzuKExpression of IGF-1 and IGF-1R and their relation to clinicopathological factors in colorectal cancerAnticancer Res3125412545201121873172 ZhangZZhangYLaoSQiuJPanZFengXThe clinicopathological and prognostic significances of IGF-1R and Livin expression in patients with colorectal cancerBMC Cancer22855202210.1186/s12885-022-09961-y35931997 SekharamMZhaoHSunMFangQZhangQYuanZDanHCBoulwareDChengJQCoppolaDInsulin-like growth factor 1 receptor enhances invasion and induces resistance to apoptosis of colon cancer cells through the Akt/Bcl-x(L) pathwayCancer Res6377087716200314633695 García-EcheverríaCPearsonMAMartiAMeyerTMestanJZimmermannJGaoJBrueggenJCapraroHGCozensRIn vivo antitumor activity of NVP-AEW541-A novel, potent, and selective inhibitor of the IGF-IR kinaseCancer Cell5231239200410.1016/S1535-6108(04)00051-015050915 PennarunBKleibeukerJHOenemaTStegehuisJHde VriesEGde JongSInhibition of IGF-1R-dependent PI3K activation sensitizes colon cancer cells specifically to DR5-mediated apoptosis but not to rhTRAILAnal Cell Pathol (Amst)33229244201010.1155/2010/97809720978316 PennarunBKleibeukerJHOenemaTStegehuisJHde VriesEGde JongSInhibition of IGF-1R-dependent PI3K activation sensitizes colon cancer cells specifically to DR5-mediated apoptosis but not to rhTRAILCell Oncol (Dordr)34245259201110.1007/s13402-011-0033-921538027 CarboniJMWittmanMYangZLeeFGreerAHurlburtWHillermanSCaoCCantorGHDell-JohnJBMS-754807, a small molecule inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1R/IRMol Cancer Ther833413349200910.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-049919996272 Fuentes-BaileMVenteroMPEncinarJAGarcía-MoralesPPoveda-DeltellMPérez-ValencianoEBarberáVMGallego-PlazasJRodríguez-LescureÁMartín-NietoJSacedaMDifferential effects of IGF-1R small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors BMS-754807 and OSI-906 on human cancer cell linesCancers (Basel)123717202010.3390/cancers1212371733322337 LeiphrakpamPDAgarwalEMathiesenMHaferbierKLBrattainMGChowdhurySIn vivo analysis of insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor humanized monoclonal antibody MK-0646 and small molecule kinase inhibitor OSI-906 in colorectal cancerOncol Rep318794201410.3892/or.2013.281924173770 LeeSOKwakAWLeeMHSeoJHChoSSYoonGChaeJIJooSHShimJHPicropodophyllotoxin induces G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells via ROS generation and activation of p38 MAPK signaling pathwayJ Microbiol Biotechnol3116151623202110.4014/jmb.2109.0901234528917 SiposFBohusné BartaBSimonÁNagyLDankóTRaffayREPetőváriGZsirosVWichmannBSebestyénAMűzesGSurvival of HT29 cancer cells is affected by IGF1R inhibition via modulation of Self-DNA-Triggered TLR9 signaling and the autophagy responsePathol Oncol Res281610322202210.3389/pore.2022.161032235651701 Codony-ServatJCuatrecasasMAsensioEMontironiCMartínez-CardúsAMarín-AguileraMHorndlerCMartínez-BalibreaERubiniMJaresPNuclear IGF-1R predicts chemotherapy and targeted therapy resistance in metastatic colorectal cancerBr J Cancer11717771786201710.1038/bjc.2017.27929123263 SunRTaninoRTongXHaqueEFAmanoYIsobeTTsubataYPicropodophyllin inhibits the growth of pemetrexed-resistant malignant pleural mesothelioma via microtubule inhibition and IGF-1R-, caspase-independent pathwaysTransl Lung Cancer Res11543559202210.21037/tlcr-21-76535529797 SinghRKGaikwadSMJinagerAChaudhurySMaheshwariARayPIGF-1R inhibition potentiates cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in early stages of chemoresistant ovarian cancer cellsCancer Lett354254262201410.1016/j.canlet.2014.08.02325157649 DuJShiHRRenFWangJLWuQHLiXZhangRTInhibition of the IGF signaling pathway reverses cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cellsBMC Cancer17851201710.1186/s12885-017-3840-129241458 PräbstKEngelhardtHRinggelerSHübnerHBasic colorimetric proliferation assays: MTT, WST, and ResazurinMethods Mol Biol1601117201710.1007/978-1-4939-6960-9_128470513 OurhzifEMDecombatCAbrunhosa-ThomasIDelortLKhouiliMAkssiraMCaldefie-ChezetFChalardPTroinYSynthesis and biological evaluation of new naphthoquinones derivativesCurr Org Synth17224229202010.2174/157017941766620021211195632091341 LiuTZhangXDuLWangYLiuXTianHWangLLiPZhaoYDuanWExosome-transmitted miR-128-3p increase chemosensitivity of oxaliplatin-resistant colorectal cancerMol Cancer1843201910.1186/s12943-019-0981-730890168 BootAvan EendenburgJCrobachSRuanoDSpeetjensFCalameJOostingJMorreauHvan WezelTCharacterization of novel low passage primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cell linesOncotarget71449914509201610.18632/oncotarget.739126894854 McCarthyBSinghRLevi-PolyachenkoNOxaliplatin-resistant colorectal cancer models for nanoparticle hyperthermiaInt J Hyperthermia38152164202110.1080/02656736.2021.187625333576281 TarnowskiMTkaczMZgutkaKBujakJKopytkoPPawlikAPicropodophyllin (PPP) is a potent rhabdomyosarcoma growth inhibitor both in vitro and in vivoBMC Cancer17532201710.1186/s12885-017-3495-y28793874 WangQWeiFLvGLiCLiuTHadjipanayisCGZhangGHaoCBellailACThe association of TP53 mutations with the resistance of colorectal carcinoma to the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor picropodophyllinBMC Cancer13521201310.1186/1471-2407-13-52124182354 DongLDuMLvQPicropodophyllin inhibits type I endometrial cancer cell proliferation via disruption of the PI3K/Akt pathwayActa Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)51753760201910.1093/abbs/gmz05531168597 KimSYToretskyJAScherDHelmanLJThe role of IGF-1R in pediatric malignanciesOncologist148391200910.1634/theoncologist.2008-018919126579 OhSHJinQKimESKhuriFRLeeHYInsulin-like growth factor-I receptor signaling pathway induces resistance to the apoptotic activities of SCH66336 (lonafarnib) through Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin-mediated increases in survivin expressionClin Cancer Res1415811589200810.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-095218316583 JonesHEGeeJMBarrowDTongeDHollowayBNicholsonRIInhibition of insulin receptor isoform-A signalling restores sensitivity to gefitinib in previously de novo resistant colon cancer cellsBr J Cancer95172180200610.1038/sj.bjc.660323716819546 LiLGuXYueJZhaoQLvDChenHXuLAcquisition of EGFR TKI resistance and EMT phenotype is linked with activation of IGF1R/NF-κB pathway in EGFR-mutant NSCLCOncotarget89224092253201710.18632/oncotarget.2117029190911 ChengFZhangRSunCRanQZhangCShenCYaoZWangMSongLPengCOxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients: Mechanisms, pharmacokinetics and strategiesFront Pharmacol141231401202310.3389/fphar.2023.123140137593174 DuanZChoyEHarmonDYangCRyuKSchwabJMankinHHornicekFJInsulin-like growth factor-I receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor cyclolignan picropodophyllin inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in multidrug resistant osteosarcoma cell linesMol Cancer Ther821222130200910.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-011519638450 ArcaroATargeting the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor in human cancerFront Pharmacol430201310.3389/fphar.2013.0003023525758 YangADFanFCampERvan BurenGLiuWSomcioRGrayMJChengHHoffPMEllisLMChronic oxaliplatin resistance induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cell linesClin Cancer Res12(14 Pt 1)41474153200610.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-003816857785 SkarkovaVKralovaVKrbalLMatouskovaPSoukupJRudolfEOxaliplatin and irinotecan induce heterogenous changes in the EMT markers of metastasizing colorectal carcinoma cellsExp Cell Res369295303201810.1016/j.yexcr.2018.05.03229842879 LiXZhangZSZhangXHYangSNLiuDDiaoCRWangHZhengFPCyanidin inhibits EMT induced by oxaliplatin via targeting the PDK1-PI3K/Akt signaling pathwayFood Funct10592601201910.1039/C8FO01611A30672917 KurterHYesilJDaskinECalibasi-KocalGEllidokuzHBasbinarYDrug resistance mechanisms on colorectal cancerJ Basic Clin Health Sci18893202110.30621/jbachs.869310 ChenYZhengXWuCThe role of the tumor microenvironment and treatment strategies in colorectal cancerFront Immunol12792691202110.3389/fimmu.2021.79269134925375

Effects of single and combined treatments with OX and PPP on the viability of HCT116 and HCT116-R cells. IC50 value determination of OX for (A) HCT116 cells and (B) HCT116-R cells. Cell viability assay results for (C) HCT116 and (D) HCT116-R cells treated with varying concentrations of PPP (1–7 µM). Cell viability of (E) HCT116 and (F) HCT116-R cells following single and combined treatments with OX and PPP. *P<0.05, **P<0.01. OX, oxaliplatin; PPP, picropodophyllin; -R, OX-resistant; ns, not significant.

Evaluation of migration of HCT116 and HCT116-R cells using wound-healing assays. (A) Representative images showing wound closure at 0 and 48 h in HCT116 cells. Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) Quantitative analysis of wound closure (migration rate) in HCT116 cells, performed to assess the effects of single and combined treatments of OX and PPP. (C) Representative images showing wound closure at 0 and 48 h in HCT116-R cells. Scale bar. 50 µm. (D) Quantitative analysis of wound closure (migration rate) in HCT116-R cells, performed to evaluate the effects of single and combined treatments of OX and PPP treatments. *P<0.05. OX, oxaliplatin; PPP, picropodophyllin; -R, OX-resistant.

Evaluation of the expression levels of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and the mesenchymal marker vimentin in HCT116 and HCT116-R cells following single and combination treatments with OX and PPP. (A) Representative fluorescence images showing E-cadherin and vimentin expression in HCT116 cells. Scale bar, 20 µm. Quantitative analysis of (B) E-cadherin and (C) vimentin fluorescence intensity in HCT116 cells. (D) Representative fluorescence images showing E-cadherin and vimentin expression in HCT116-R cells. Scale bar, 20 µm. Quantitative analysis of (E) E-cadherin and (F) vimentin fluorescence intensity in HCT116-R cells. *P<0.05. OX, oxaliplatin; PPP, picropodophyllin; -R, OX-resistant.