<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MCO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Molecular and Clinical Oncology</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2049-9450</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2049-9469</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MCO-22-6-02850</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mco.2025.2850</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Articles</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Real‑world application of Cytalux for targeted imaging of occult peritoneal disease in epithelial ovarian cancer</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Baron</surname><given-names>Ekaterina</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="aff"/>
<xref rid="c1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="corresp"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Patterson</surname><given-names>Ryan</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tillman</surname><given-names>Rachel</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wernberg</surname><given-names>Jessica A.</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>Rohit</given-names></name>
<xref rid="af1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-MCO-22-6-02850">Surgical Oncology, Marshfield Medical Center, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-MCO-22-6-02850"><italic>Correspondence to:</italic> Dr Ekaterina Baron, Surgical Oncology, Marshfield Medical Center, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA <email>baron.kate@yahoo.com mcwemail@163.com </email></corresp>
<fn><p><italic>Abbreviations:</italic> BRCA, breast cancer gene; CA-125, cancer antigen 125; CC, completeness of cytoreduction; CRS, cytoreductive surgery; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; FP, false positive; HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; HIPAA, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; IRB, Institutional Review Board; NACT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NIR, near-infrared; PCI, peritoneal cancer index; POD, postoperative day; PSS, prior surgical score; TP, true positive</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>16</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year></pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>6</issue>
<elocation-id>55</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x00A9; 2025 Baron et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License</ext-link>, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.</license-p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Occult disease in normal-appearing peritoneum is common in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), especially after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Pafolacianine (Cytalux) is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved agent for targeted imaging of EOC occult disease. The current study presents its first out-of-trial use during cytoreductive surgery (CRS). This study analyzed three cases of Cytalux application in patients with EOC and peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion. Targeted imaging with Cytalux was performed before CRS to confirm uptake by visible lesions and after to identify occult disease. The association between Cytalux-positive disease and pathology was evaluated. Patient A had primary EOC and patients B and C had recurrent disease. All patients received NACT. Patient A had a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 21 and a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score of 1, while patients B and C both had PCI 9 and CC score of 0. Cytalux imaging was associated with all macroscopic lesions. In patient A, Cytalux identified 16 additional peritoneal lesions with 14 confirmed as metastases &#x005B;true positive (TP) rate, 87.5&#x0025;&#x005D;. Two Cytalux-positive peritoneal areas were fulgurated until the signal loss but subsequently tested positive for cancer. In patients B and C, Cytalux detected two lesions in each case with 50.0&#x0025; positive on pathology. Overall peritoneal-level TP and false positive (FP) rates were 80.0 and 20.0&#x0025;, respectively. Cytalux can help identify occult EOC peritoneal disease and manage questionable areas of post-chemotherapy fibrosis. However, the FP rate is considerable. Cytalux signal navigation should not be used for energy destruction of lesions until more data are available.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>peritoneal metastases</kwd>
<kwd>peritoneal carcinomatosis</kwd>
<kwd>ovarian cancer</kwd>
<kwd>Pafolacianine</kwd>
<kwd>occult disease</kwd>
<kwd>imaging</kwd>
<kwd>clinical implication</kwd>
<kwd>surgical oncology</kwd>
<kwd>gynecological oncology</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Funding:</bold> No funding was received.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Up to 75&#x0025; of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) present with peritoneal spread, making cytoreductive surgery (CRS), with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a cornerstone of treatment (<xref rid="b1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="b2-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). The best disease control is achieved through the complete removal of all macroscopic tumor (<xref rid="b3-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>). Systemic chemotherapy is also frequently utilized, especially in patients unsuitable for upfront resection (<xref rid="b4-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can be substantial with the peritoneum displaying scarring, adhesions, or even completely normal appearance, despite prior tumor presence (<xref rid="b5-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>,<xref rid="b6-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>).</p>
<p>Occult disease-microscopic lesions in normal-appearing peritoneum-remains a significant challenge in EOC, particularly in patients after NACT (<xref rid="b7-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). It occurs near visible tumor nodules in up to 46&#x0025; of cases and in entirely normal-looking regions in 34&#x0025; (<xref rid="b6-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b7-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). These lesions are clinically significant and can lead to gross disease recurrence and poor survival outcomes. Visual inspection and palpation during surgery are often insufficient for detecting occult EOC disease (<xref rid="b8-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>). Total parietal peritonectomy has been proposed by several centers to reduce the risk of residual occult tumor; however, this approach can result in substantial surgical trauma, associated with high complication rates and increased mortality (<xref rid="b6-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b9-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>).</p>
<p>Pafolacianine (Cytalux) is the first agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for intraoperative tumor-targeted visualization in ovarian and lung cancer. It works through a folic acid analog tracer conjugated with indocyanine green, which targets the folate receptor overexpressed in EOC cells, and is visualized intraoperatively using near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging (<xref rid="b11-MCO-22-6-02850 b12-MCO-22-6-02850 b13-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">11-13</xref>). Data from phase II and III trials showed promising results, leading to FDA approval in 2021; however, it has not yet been widely adopted, and no real-world data are currently available (<xref rid="b14-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>,<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). We report, to our knowledge, one of the first national out-of-trial experiences using Cytalux, evaluating its utility in detecting occult disease following complete macroscopic resection during CRS/HIPEC in patients with primary and recurrent EOC with peritoneal metastases.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Study design</title>
<p>A case series study was conducted to describe and analyze the outcomes of Cytalux application in out-of-trial settings.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Participants, data source, and setting</title>
<p>We identified patients with primary or recurrent EOC and peritoneal dissemination who underwent CRS/HIPEC with the use of Cytalux for detecting occult disease. Patient demographic, surgical, and outcome data were extracted from a prospectively collected institutional database, encompassing cases from 2018 to 2024. This study complied with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 revision) and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB-24-1573) on October 7, 2024. All patients provided written informed consent for participation in research and inclusion in prospective CRS/HIPEC database, including use of their intraoperative imaging and de-identified clinical data in research projects conducted using it. Before study inception, the IRB granted a waiver of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization (45 CFR 164.512(i) (<xref rid="b2-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>)(ii)), confirming that no additional patient consent was required. No biological samples were collected for research purposes-histopathological analyses were performed as part of standard clinical care, and only de-identified surgery and pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Variables</title>
<p>Prior surgical score (PSS) was used to quantify surgical history with PSS-2/3 considered extensive previous surgeries (<xref rid="b16-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). Tumor burden was measured using the peritoneal cancer index (PCI), with scoring from 0 to 39(<xref rid="b17-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was used post-CRS to record the amount of residual tumor, with CC-0/1 indicating complete cytoreduction (<xref rid="b18-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CRS/HIPEC</title>
<p>All procedures were performed by a surgical oncologist experienced in the CRS/HIPEC for various peritoneal surface malignancies. Cytalux was administered in a dose of 0.025 mg/kg in the preoperative area within 1 h before the procedure. After laparotomy in the lithotomy position, the abdominal cavity was explored and the PCI was recorded. The Stryker 1788 imaging system was used to confirm Cytalux uptake by visible tumor lesions prior to resection. Multiple organ resections and peritonectomies were then performed with the goal of achieving macroscopically complete tumor removal. All anastomoses were performed before the chemoperfusion. Once CRS was concluded, the CC-score was recorded, and HIPEC was performed with 150 mg of cisplatin using a closed technique, with perfusion for 90 min at a target temperature of 41-42&#x02DA;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Follow-up</title>
<p>The first follow-up appointment occurred at 2-3 weeks post-discharge and included a physical examination and wound check. Subsequent surveillance included physical examination, CA-125 level assessment, and imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis every 6 months for 5 years, or sooner if patients experienced symptoms.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title/>
<sec>
<title>Patient and disease characteristics</title>
<p>Out of 96 patients in the database, 3 met the inclusion criteria. Age was 64 years in Patient A, 68 in Patient B, and 62 years in Patient C (<xref rid="tI-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>). All 3 patients had preoperative pathology consistent with high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma in all included patients. BRCA-2 mutations were present in patients B and C. Patient A had primary stage IIIc ovarian cancer and underwent 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a significant response based on imaging. Patients B and C had recurrent ovarian cancer, which was first diagnosed 6 and 3 years prior, respectively. Their previous treatment and disease courses are described in detail in <xref rid="tI-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="table">Table I</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Treatment characteristics and surgical outcomes</title>
<p>After abdominal exploration, PCI was 21 for patient A and 9 for patients B and C. A CC-1 score was achieved for patient A, while patients B and C had CC-0. The length of surgery was 977, 735, and 573 min for patients A, B, and C, respectively. Estimated blood loss was 1,500 ml for patient A, 350 ml for patient B, and 600 ml for patient C, with all patients requiring intraoperative blood transfusions.</p>
<p>Patient A&#x0027;s recovery was complicated only by a pleural effusion that required thoracentesis. Patient B developed bilateral pulmonary embolism, necessitating reintubation on postoperative day (POD) 3. She was later discharged to a rehabilitation facility but was readmitted with aspiration pneumonia on POD 27 and expired on POD 36 after her family elected to withdraw care. Patient C had a relatively uneventful recovery after a brief re-intubation for stridor (POD 2-4).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Cytalux application</title>
<p>Cytalux imaging correlated with all macroscopic lesions in all three cases. In patient A, post-CRS Cytalux revealed 16 additional positive peritoneal areas. Of these, 3 had no palpable or visible abnormalities even upon close inspection: the parietal peritoneum in the right flank and lower quadrant, the left flank and lower quadrant, and the left diaphragm. One area, initially suspected to be post-chemotherapy fibrosis, was Cytalux-positive and later confirmed as malignant by pathology. Cytalux-positive areas of parietal peritoneum were extensively fulgurated with argon plasma for over 20 min, until the NIR signal was lost, and then resected; however, pathology confirmed cancer. The other 13 Cytalux-visualized lesions, missed during the initial abdominal exploration, were very small and identified only after targeted imaging. They included 11 mesenteric peritoneum nodules (9 positive and 2 negative for cancer), a 1 right upper quadrant lesion (positive), and about 30 cm of colon with multiple millet-sized lesions, all confirmed as cancer (<xref rid="f1-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). A single Cytalux-positive retroperitoneal lymph node near the inferior vena cava was removed but found negative for carcinoma. Among 16 Cytalux-guided peritoneal samples, 14 (87.5&#x0025;) were positive for cancer, and 2 (12.5&#x0025;) were found negative.</p>
<p>For patient B, Cytalux imaging identified two areas of concern for occult disease: the appendix (<xref rid="f2-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>), which was later confirmed to be a metastasis of high-grade ovarian carcinoma, and a segment of small bowel previously adherent to the right lower quadrant tumor but dissected off it before resection. The resected segment came back negative for malignancy. Additionally, Cytalux showed uniform uptake inside the gallbladder, with no visible surface disease. The true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) rates were both 50.0&#x0025;.</p>
<p>In patient C, Cytalux highlighted the entire small bowel on initial imaging after all visible tumors were removed. As the imaging intensity decreased, two positive areas with no visible lesions on close inspection were identified: one on the abdominal wall on the right posterior rectus sheath, which was later found negative for cancer, and a large area of parietal peritoneum of the abdominal wall below the umbilicus, which was positive. Both TP and FP rates were 50.0&#x0025; each.</p>
<p>Overall, at the peritoneal lesion level, the TP rate was 80.0&#x0025; (16/20) and the FP rate was 20.0&#x0025; (4/20). Included patients experienced neither intra-nor postoperative known Cytalux-related complications.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Oncology outcomes</title>
<p>Final pathology for patient A confirmed papillary serous carcinoma with 25&#x0025; PD-L1 expression. She was started on adjuvant therapy with nivolumab and shows no laboratory or imaging signs of disease 8 months after CRS/HIPEC. Pathology for patients B and C revealed high-grade serous carcinoma. Patient C was started on postoperative liposomal doxorubicin and remains disease-free 3 months post-procedure.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="Discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This report presents the first out-of-trial experience using Cytalux-based intraoperative imaging to detect occult disease in EOC with peritoneal spread during CRS/HIPEC. Cytalux uptake correlated with visible tumors and identified at least one additional non-visible lesion post-CRS in each of the three patients. The overall true positive rate for occult peritoneal lesions after CRS was 80&#x0025;, with a false positive rate of 20&#x0025;. Notably, Cytalux imaging revealed one area of post-chemotherapy fibrosis, later confirmed as malignant by pathology. Additionally, 2 Cytalux-positive peritoneal areas underwent extensive argon plasma fulguration for over 20 min until the NIR signal was lost, but both were still positive for cancer, suggesting caution in using Cytalux imaging for this purpose. These findings validate previously published data from clinical trials on Cytalux efficacy in real-world settings while also highlighting critical new challenges associated with its intraoperative use.</p>
<p>All patients in our study demonstrated Cytalux uptake in grossly visible tumors, confirming high folate receptor expression in all EOC cases. Previous studies have shown that EOC cells can express folate receptors at levels 10-100 times higher than normal tissues, making them an attractive target for imaging occult disease (<xref rid="b12-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>,<xref rid="b13-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>,<xref rid="b19-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>). In a phase III trial, 109 out of 150 patients who received infusion with Cytalux had confirmed folate-receptor-positive EOC (<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). This high uptake is likely because of Cytalux targeting folate receptor alpha, present in up to 90&#x0025; of EOC, rather than the less frequently expressed folate receptor beta, found in about 20&#x0025; of EOC. Two patients in our study had high-grade serous carcinoma, and one had papillary serous carcinoma, indicating that even different EOC subtypes can express folate receptors and show appropriate Cytalux uptake. In the phase III trial, up to 18&#x0025; of patients with folate-receptor-positive disease had less common EOC variants than high-grade serous carcinoma (<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Both our and previous data suggest that Cytalux has a high affinity for tumor cells in the majority of EOC patients, but its uptake should be confirmed at the beginning of the procedure before tumor removal.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the first antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor alpha, mirvetuximab soravtansine, was recently approved by FDA for treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Its interaction with Cytalux is unclear but competitive blockade of folic receptors alpha can potentially interfere with Cytalux uptake and accuracy of the imaging, warranting further investigation.</p>
<p>Achieving complete cytoreduction is crucial in EOC, as the presence of residual occult disease worsens patient outcomes. Therefore, total parietal peritonectomy has been proposed by several centers outside the United States to cope with occult disease yet it can significantly increase morbidity while the impact on survival is unclear (<xref rid="b6-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>,<xref rid="b9-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>,<xref rid="b10-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>). The concept of using Cytalux for targeted imaging is a precise identification of occult lesions that offers a more selective approach and potentially reduces the need for highly morbid procedures such as total peritonectomy. In our study, the TP rate for Cytalux-positive lesions was 80&#x0025;, consistent with 83&#x0025; reported in the clinical trial, where 395 of 531 lesions were TP (<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Notably, Cytalux identified additional occult lesions in all patients in our cohort. In the original trial, the rate of additionally detected lesions by Cytalux that were confirmed by pathology but not initially planned for resection was 39.7&#x0025; for interval CRS and 17.1&#x0025; for primary CRS (<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). Our findings reinforce the clinical utility of Cytalux in guiding and achieving more thorough cytoreduction by enhancing intraoperative lesion detection beyond standard visual and tactile assessment, thereby potentially improving long-term EOC patient outcomes.</p>
<p>There are several limitations to the use of Cytalux. A significant FP rate, leading to unnecessary resections, has been previously reported. In our study, the FP rate was 20&#x0025;, which is lower than the 32.7&#x0025; reported in the phase III trial (<xref rid="b15-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). The FP rate can vary significantly depending on the interpretation of imaging. For patient C, nearly the entire small bowel surface was highlighted with Cytalux at the beginning of the case, which resolved with a decrease in imaging gain. Fluorescence can occur in normal tissues, including areas of the bowel, kidneys, lymph nodes, lungs, and inflamed tissue, leading to potential interpretation errors. This underscores the importance of fluorescence standardization and surgeon training to optimize imaging interpretation and minimize unnecessary resections. Additionally, the presence of company representatives during the first several cases may be necessary for accurate imaging interpretation and navigation.</p>
<p>An interesting finding in our study is the failure of argon beam tumor destruction under Cytalux navigation in patient A. In this case, two substantial areas, each more than 10 cm in diameter, were Cytalux-positive but had no grossly visible lesions on close inspection. These areas underwent argon fulguration for over 20 min until the Cytalux signal was lost and eschar was formed. However, when resected, these areas were confirmed to be malignant on pathology. Energy-based tumor destruction methods, including electrocautery, argon beam coagulation, ultrasonic surgical aspirator, and carbon dioxide laser, are commonly used by cytoreductive surgeons to reduce tumor burden and increase the likelihood of complete cytoreduction, particularly for implants in difficult locations (<xref rid="b20-MCO-22-6-02850 b21-MCO-22-6-02850 b22-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">20-22</xref>). However, the efficacy of thermal tumor destruction has not been systematically studied. Based on our experience, Cytalux should not be used for guidance during thermal tumor destruction until more data are available.</p>
<p>This study has several limitations related to its design. First, the small sample size, with only three patients, did not allow for a comprehensive statistical analysis. Larger, multicenter prospective studies with a greater number of participants are needed to validate our results, assess patient selection criteria, and better characterize Cytalux&#x0027;s sensitivity and specificity in real-world clinical settings. Second, the short follow-up period prevented us from assessing the impact of Cytalux-guided cytoreduction on survival outcomes. Future studies should incorporate longitudinal follow-up to determine whether Cytalux-guided resection of occult disease improves progression-free and overall survival. Lastly, we were unable to calculate true and false negative rates, as this would require performing a total parietal peritonectomy, a highly morbid procedure that is not done routinely. Future trials could integrate biopsy mapping strategies or other validation methods to provide a more accurate assessment of the extent of occult disease missed by standard imaging techniques. Despite these limitations, our study bridges the gap between clinical trial data and real-world application, offering early insights into the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of integrating Cytalux into routine EOC management.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the use of Cytalux in real-world settings demonstrates significant efficacy in identifying occult peritoneal disease in a substantial proportion of EOC patients with peritoneal metastases, with a true positive rate of up to 80&#x0025;. However, a notable false positive rate emphasizes the need for cautious interpretation, particularly in the context of surgical decision-making. Cytalux signal navigation should not be used for guiding thermal tumor destruction until more evidence becomes available. Routine Cytalux-guided decision-making may require standardization of fluorescence approach, implementation of special training for surgeons with learning curve to correctly identify and interpret lesions, and development of real-time lesion validation by frozen pathology. Continued collection of real-world data is critical to fully assess Cytalux utility in out-of-trial settings, ultimately guiding its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>Not applicable.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Availability of data and materials</title>
<p>The data generated in the present study may be requested from the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; contributions</title>
<p>EB conceptualized and designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the original draft. RP collected the data, designed the methodology, and reviewed and edited the paper. RT collected and analyzed the data, and reviewed and edited the paper. JAW conceptualized and designed the study, and reviewed and edited the paper. RS conceptualized and designed the study, reviewed and edited the paper, and was the project administrator. EB and RS confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have made substantial intellectual contributions to the conception, design and execution of this study. Each author has actively participated in drafting the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content. Furthermore, all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title>
<p>This study complied with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 revision) and received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB-24-1573) on October 7, 2024. All patients provided written informed consent for participation in research and inclusion in prospective CRS/HIPEC database, including use of their intraoperative imaging and de-identified clinical data in research projects conducted using it. Before study inception, the IRB granted a waiver of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization &#x005B;45 CFR 164.512(i) (<xref rid="b2-MCO-22-6-02850" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>)(ii)&#x005D;, confirming that no additional patient consent was required. No biological samples were collected for research purposes-histopathological analyses were performed as part of standard clinical care, and only de-identified surgery and pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Patient consent for publication</title>
<p>All patients provided written informed consent for including their de-identified clinical data and intraoperative images in prospectively collected CRS/HIPEC database and its use for research, including this publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Authors&#x0027; information</title>
<p>ORCIDs: Ekaterina Baron, 0000-0001-9704-6547; Ryan Patterson, 0009-0003-4114-2099; Rohit Sharma, 0000-0002-2884-3099.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Stein</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Aalbers</surname><given-names>AGJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sonke</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>van Driel</surname><given-names>WJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian and colorectal cancer: A review</article-title><source>JAMA Oncol</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>1231</fpage><lpage>1238</lpage><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33956063</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0580</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><comment>Chicago Consensus Working Group</comment><article-title>The Chicago consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: Management of ovarian neoplasms</article-title><source>Cancer</source><volume>126</volume><fpage>2553</fpage><lpage>2560</lpage><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32285271</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-020-08322-y</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Winter</surname><given-names>WE III</given-names></name><name><surname>Maxwell</surname><given-names>GL</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlson</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozols</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name><name><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>PG</given-names></name><name><surname>Markman</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Armstrong</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Muggia</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>McGuire</surname><given-names>WP</given-names></name></person-group><comment>Gynecologic Oncology Group Study</comment><article-title>Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study</article-title><source>J Clin Oncol</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>3621</fpage><lpage>3627</lpage><year>2007</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17704411</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vergote</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Trop&#x00E9;</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Amant</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Kristensen</surname><given-names>GB</given-names></name><name><surname>Ehlen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Verheijen</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Burg</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Lacave</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Panici</surname><given-names>PB</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer</article-title><source>N Engl J Med</source><volume>363</volume><fpage>943</fpage><lpage>953</lpage><year>2010</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20818904</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa0908806</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCluggage</surname><given-names>WG</given-names></name><name><surname>Lyness</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name><name><surname>Atkinson</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobbs</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Harley</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>McClelland</surname><given-names>HR</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Morphological effects of chemotherapy on ovarian carcinoma</article-title><source>J Clin Pathol</source><volume>55</volume><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><year>2002</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11825920</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jcp.55.1.27</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhatt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kammar</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinukumar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Parikh</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Jumle</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaikh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mehta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Total parietal peritonectomy can be performed with acceptable morbidity for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from a prospective multi-centric study</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>1118</fpage><lpage>1129</lpage><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32748154</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-020-08918-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhatt</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakrin</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Kammar</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Mehta</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sinukumar</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Parikh</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Shaikh</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mallaya</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kepenekian</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Distribution of residual disease in the peritoneum following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and its potential therapeutic implications</article-title><source>Eur J Surg Oncol</source><volume>47</volume><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33071172</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hynninen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavonius</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Oksa</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Gr&#x00E9;nman</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Carp&#x00E9;n</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Auranen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Is perioperative visual estimation of intra-abdominal tumor spread reliable in ovarian cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><volume>128</volume><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>232</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23142076</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baratti</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Kusamura</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabras</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Deraco</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Cytoreductive surgery with selective versus complete parietal peritonectomy followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A controlled study</article-title><source>Ann Surg Oncol</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>1416</fpage><lpage>1424</lpage><year>2012</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22302266</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-012-2237-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yokosu</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanabe</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Nomura</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozone</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Saito</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Takano</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Okamoto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Total parietal peritonectomy in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol Rep</source><volume>37</volume><issue>100805</issue><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34159244</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gore.2021.100805</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Dam</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name><name><surname>Themelis</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Crane</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Harlaar</surname><given-names>NJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pleijhuis</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelder</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarantopoulos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>de Jong</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Arts</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Zee</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-&#x03B1; targeting: First in-human results</article-title><source>Nat Med</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>1315</fpage><lpage>1319</lpage><year>2011</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21926976</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nm.2472</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x0027;Shannessy</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Somers</surname><given-names>EB</given-names></name><name><surname>Smale</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>YS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Expression of folate receptor-&#x03B1; (FRA) in gynecologic malignancies and its relationship to the tumor type</article-title><source>Int J Gynecol Pathol</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>258</fpage><lpage>268</lpage><year>2013</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23518909</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PGP.0b013e3182774562</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalli</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name><name><surname>Oberg</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Keeney</surname><given-names>GL</given-names></name><name><surname>Christianson</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Low</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Knutson</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartmann</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folate receptor alpha as a tumor target in epithelial ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>619</fpage><lpage>626</lpage><year>2008</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18222534</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.020</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Randall</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wenham</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name><name><surname>Low</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Dowdy</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanyi</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A phase II, multicenter, open-label trial of OTL38 injection for the intra-operative imaging of folate receptor-alpha positive ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><volume>155</volume><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31362825</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.010</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanyi</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Randall</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Chambers</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Winer</surname><given-names>IS</given-names></name><name><surname>Langstraat</surname><given-names>CL</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>ES</given-names></name><name><surname>Vahrmeijer</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chon</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A phase III study of pafolacianine injection (OTL38) for intraoperative imaging of folate receptor-positive ovarian cancer (Study 006)</article-title><source>J Clin Oncol</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36070540</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1200/JCO.22.00291</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paul</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Ihemelandu</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugarbaker</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prior surgical score: An analysis of the prognostic significance of an initial nondefinitive surgical intervention in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of a colorectal origin undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy</article-title><source>Dis Colon Rectum</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>347</fpage><lpage>354</lpage><year>2018</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29420428</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/DCR.0000000000001003</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacquet</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugarbaker</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis</article-title><source>Cancer Treat Res</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>359</fpage><lpage>374</lpage><year>1996</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8849962</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugarbaker</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome?</article-title><source>Lancet Oncol</source><volume>7</volume><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><year>2006</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16389186</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70539-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parker</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Turk</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Westrick</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Low</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Leamon</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folate receptor expression in carcinomas and normal tissues determined by a quantitative radioligand binding assay</article-title><source>Anal Biochem</source><volume>338</volume><fpage>284</fpage><lpage>293</lpage><year>2005</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15745749</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ab.2004.12.026</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bristow</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Montz</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Complete surgical cytoreduction of advanced ovarian carcinoma using the argon beam coagulator</article-title><source>Gynecol Oncol</source><volume>83</volume><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><year>2001</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11585412</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/gyno.2001.6344</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fanning</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hilgers</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Richards</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Hunt</surname><given-names>KD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Carbon dioxide laser vaporization of intestinal metastases of epithelial ovarian cancer</article-title><source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>324</fpage><lpage>327</lpage><year>1994</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11578426</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1525-1438.1994.04050324.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-MCO-22-6-02850"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Manning-Geist</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Gockley</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sisodia</surname><given-names>RC</given-names></name><name><surname>Del Carmen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Growdon</surname><given-names>WB</given-names></name><name><surname>Horowitz</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Berkowitz</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Worley</surname><given-names>M Jr</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Use of ablation and ultrasonic aspiration at primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer</article-title><source>Int J Gynecol Cancer</source><volume>30</volume><fpage>1052</fpage><lpage>1057</lpage><year>2020</year><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32487686</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/ijgc-2020-001466</pub-id></element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-MCO-22-6-02850" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Intraoperative targeted imaging of occult peritoneal disease in Patient A. (A) Grossly visible disease on the descending and sigmoid colon illuminated with (B) Cytalux and (C) near-infrared fluorescence.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-22-06-02850-g00.tif" />
</fig>
<fig id="f2-MCO-22-6-02850" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Postoperative targeted imaging of occult peritoneal disease in Patient B. The removed appendix with occult not grossly visible disease highlighted with (A) Cytalux and (B) near-infrared fluorescence.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="mco-22-06-02850-g01.tif" />
</fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-MCO-22-6-02850" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption><p>Patient characteristics.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Patient A</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Patient B</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Patient C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Age, years</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">64</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">68</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">BRCA 2 mutations</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">-</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">+</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PSS</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Disease</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Primary</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Recurrent</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Recurrent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Prior course</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2022; Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (6 cycles)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2022; Suboptimal CRS &#x2022; Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (6 cycles) &#x2022; Olaparib (4 years) Recurrence</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2022; Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (3 cycles) &#x2022; CRS &#x2022; Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (3 cycles) &#x2022; Niraparib (1 year) Recurrence: &#x2022; Carboplatin + Paclitaxel (8 cycles) &#x2022; Bevacizumab (maintenance)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PCI</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">21</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">9</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CC-score</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CC-1</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CC-0</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CC-0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Length of surgery, min</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">977</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">735</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">573</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">EBL, ml</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1,500</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">350</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Blood transfusion</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">+</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">+</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Length of hospital stay, days</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">14</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">19</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Cytalux-positive occult peritoneal disease</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">16 lesions: &#x2022; 11 mesenteric lesions (9 path+) &#x2022; 5 parietal peritoneum lesions (5 path+)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2 lesions: &#x2022; Appendix (path+) &#x2022; Segment of small bowel (path-)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2 lesions: &#x2022; Right lateral abdominal wall lesion (path-) &#x2022; Parietal peritoneum of anterior abdominal wall below umbilicus (path+)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">True positive lesions</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">14 (87.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1 (50.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1 (50.0&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">False positive lesions</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">2 (12.5&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1 (50.0&#x0025;)</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">1 (50.0&#x0025;)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>BRCA, breast cancer gene; CC, completeness of cytoreduction; CRS, cytoreductive surgery; EBL, estimated blood loss; path, pathology; PCI, peritoneal cancer index; PSS, prior surgical score.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</floats-group>
</article>
