<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<?release-delay 0|0?>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ETM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1792-0981</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1792-1015</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>D.A. Spandidos</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/etm.2014.1522</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">etm-07-04-1000</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>BLAHOV&#x000C1;</surname><given-names>EVA</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>M&#x000C1;CHAL</surname><given-names>JAN</given-names></name><xref rid="af2-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="aff">2</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-etm-07-04-1000"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>M&#x000C1;CHAL</surname><given-names>LADISLAV</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>MILAKOVI&#x00106;</surname><given-names>IRENA</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>HANUL&#x000C1;KOV&#x000C1;</surname><given-names>&#x00160;&#x000C1;RKA</given-names></name><xref rid="af1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-etm-07-04-1000">
<label>1</label>Department of Animal Reproduction, Mendel University in Brno, Brno 61300, Czech Republic</aff>
<aff id="af2-etm-07-04-1000">
<label>2</label>Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno 62500, Czech Republic</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-etm-07-04-1000">Correspondence to: Dr Jan M&#x000E1;chal, Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 62500, Czech Republic, E-mail: <email>jmachal@med.muni.cz</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>4</month>
<year>2014</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2014</year></pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>1000</fpage>
<lpage>1004</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2013</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2014</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2014, Spandidos Publications</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<license-p>This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The aim of the present study was to test whether it is possible to eliminate a high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm in male ejaculate by assisted reproduction using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method. Treatment success was evaluated by comparing fertilization, clinical pregnancy and reproduction rates between males with heavy teratospermia (&#x02264;1&#x00025; morphologically normal spermatozoa) and males with a higher percentage (&gt;1&#x00025;) of normal sperm. In total, 174 patients who had previously undergone 174 ICSI cycles (1 per each pair) were evaluated retrospectively. In the group of patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (n&#x0003D;37), the percentage of normal spermatozoa was &#x02264;1&#x00025;. In the second group, males with &gt;1&#x00025; normal spermatozoa (n&#x0003D;137) were considered as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology. The results of partner fertilization in these two groups were compared and a lower number of fertilized oocytes was identified in the patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology (P&#x0003D;0.038). However, neither the gravidity nor the take-home baby rates of the partners differed between the patients with mildly and heavily impaired sperm morphology. Trends opposite to that for fertilization were observed for gravidity and delivery &#x0005B;odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95&#x00025; confidence interval (CI), 0.29&#x02013;1.30; OR, 0.55; 95&#x00025; CI, 0.26&#x02013;1.24, respectively&#x0005D;. This indicates that the lower number of fertilized oocytes was not associated with the overall outcome of fertilization and that patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology experience the same benefit from ICSI as patients with mildly impaired sperm morphology.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>intracytoplasmic sperm injections</kwd>
<kwd>sperm morphology</kwd>
<kwd>pregnancy rate</kwd>
<kwd>reproduction rate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Morphological abnormalities of spermatozoa are often identified in males with problematic fertility. Male infertility may be classified as oligoasthenoteratozoospermia or azoospermia. The quality of spermatozoa has an essential effect on the fertilization of the oocyte and on the subsequent evolution of the embryo. A direct correlation exists between abnormal sperm and embryo morphology at the later stage of cleavage (<xref rid="b1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>). The first two cycles of embryo cell cleavage are controlled by maternal factors, whilst the paternal effect begins to apply in the embryo from the four-cell stage (<xref rid="b2-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>). The quality of DNA in sperm is evaluated as an absence/incidence of fragmentations in late embryonic development, which is the late paternal effect (<xref rid="b3-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b5-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">5</xref>).</p>
<p>The first pregnancy and birth of a child following the application of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) method was recorded in 1992 (<xref rid="b6-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). ICSI has increased the success rates of <italic>in vitro</italic> fertilization (IVF) treatment in couples with the male sterility factor. The fertilization rate following ICSI has been reported to be significantly higher compared with that of the subzonal insemination method (<xref rid="b7-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>). ICSI has been found to result in higher fertilization and pregnancy rates; it has been shown to be successful in couples with unexplained infertility (<xref rid="b8-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>), boundary spermiogram values (<xref rid="b9-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>) and immunological infertility (<xref rid="b10-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>), and couples who have experienced repeated failures following conventional treatment by IVF (<xref rid="b11-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>). Common indications for use of the ICSI method are low parameters of spermatozoa in the ejaculate. The ICSI method with ejaculated sperm may be successfully used in patients with a low count of morphologically high-quality and motile sperm in the ejaculate. Riedel <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b12-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>) established minimum andrological parameters for <italic>in vitro</italic> fertility in conventional IVF, specifying a 5&#x000D7;10<sup>6</sup> cm<sup>&#x02212;3</sup> total count, 30&#x00025; progressive motility and 30&#x00025; normal morphology; males exhibiting worse parameters in the ejaculate had an very low prognosis of successful medical treatment. The ICSI method represents an effective procedure for this type of male infertility.</p>
<p>In the present study, fertilization, pregnancy and take-home baby rates were analyzed following ICSI in males with a high percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa. Teratospermia is one of the key parameters in the selection of sperm suitable for ICSI. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether ICSI is a suitable treatment perspective for infertile males with heavy teratospermia (&#x02264;1&#x00025; normal spermatozoa).</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Patients</title>
<p>ICSI was performed between January 2008 and February 2009 to assist reproduction in 174 infertile couples at the Assisted reproduction clinic (Brno, Czech Republic). Success of the treatment was evaluated from the male viewpoint, as the study focused on male infertility. In total, 174 males were subjected to ICSI cycles. The male patients were divided into a group of 137 individuals with mildly impaired or normal sperm morphology (&gt;1&#x00025; of normal spermatozoa) and a group of 37 individuals with heavily impaired sperm morphology (&#x02264;1&#x00025; of normal spermatozoa). The mean age of the male patients was 34.9&#x000B1;2.8 years and the age of their female partners was 30.5&#x000B1;2.7 years. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine (Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Semen analysis</title>
<p>Spermatozoa were obtained through masturbation following sexual abstinence for 3&#x02013;5 days. Prior to analysis, samples were incubated for 20 min at 37&#x000B0;C for fluidization. The concentration, motility and morphology of the sperm were assessed according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (4th edition, 1999). Samples were visually assessed under a microscope.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Sperm processing</title>
<p>Spermatozoa gained from ejaculation were processed using the swim-up method (<xref rid="b13-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) and incubated at a temperature of 37&#x000B0;C with 5&#x00025; O<sub>2</sub>, 6&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> and 89&#x00025; N<sub>2</sub> in Sydney IVF Sperm Medium (Cook Medical, Brisbane, Australia).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval</title>
<p>Ovarian stimulation was induced by a long protocol in all 174 cycles using triptorelin &#x0005B;a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa); Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Saint-Prex, Switzerland&#x0005D;, Metrodin &#x0005B;follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH); Serono, Geneva, Switzerland&#x0005D; and Humegon &#x0005B;human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG); Organon Laboratories Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK). Subcutaneous triptorelin application was initiated from the mid-luteal phase of the previous cycle and continued for 14 days until sufficient downregulation of the pituitary was achieved. The development of follicles was stimulated by FSH and hMG injections. The dose of gonadotropins was individualized, and selected according to the age of the female patient, previous stimulation and response to stimulation. Ovulation was induced by injecting 5,000 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the form of Pregnyl (Organon Laboratories Ltd.) when the two largest follicles were &gt;18 mm. Oocytes were sampled 36 h following hCG application under general anesthesia using ultrasound control.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Oocyte handling</title>
<p>Cumular cells were removed from the oocytes with a denudation pipette (1&#x02013;2 h following oocyte sampling by ovum pick up) using 80 IU/ml hyaluronidase (in Sydney IVF Fertilization medium) for 10&#x02013;15 sec. Following the partial removal of cumular cells, the oocytes were further denudated (Sydney IVF Fertilization medium) until complete denudation. The denudated oocytes were placed in a cultivation box (Heracell; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under conditions of 37&#x000B0;C, 5&#x00025; O<sub>2</sub>, 6&#x00025; CO<sub>2</sub> and 89&#x00025; N<sub>2</sub>, until required for ICSI. The sperm were injected into the oocytes 2&#x02013;3 h following ovum pick up. Oocytes used for ICSI were in metaphase II (MII) after extrusion of the first polar body.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>ICSI procedure</title>
<p>ICSI was conducted using an inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a micro-manipulator (Research Instruments, Falmouth, UK) and injectors (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). During ICSI, oocytes were maintained in Sydney IVF Fertilization medium, and Sydney IVF PVP (Cook Medical) was used for spermatozoa. The oocytes were placed individually into 10-&#x003BC;l micro-drops of Sydney IVF Fertilization medium and one micro-drop with the Sydney IVF PVP medium was injected with a 2-&#x003BC;l suspension of spermatozoa. Sperm were selected, immobilized, sucked into the ICSI pipette and inserted into the oocyte cytoplasm under a microscope at &#x000D7;400 magnification, using Hoffman modulation contrast. Prior to injection, the morphological structure of the head, neck and tail of the sperm was assessed, as well as the possible occurrence of vacuoles in the sperm head. Following ICSI, the oocytes were transferred into Sydney IVF Cleavage medium (Cook Medical) and deposited in the cultivation box.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Assessment of fertilization, embryo cleavage and establishment of pregnancy</title>
<p>After 16&#x02013;18 h, oocytes were checked to verify fertilization. Fertilized oocytes were separated and tested for the occurrence of the two-pronuclei (2PN) stage. The cleavage phase of the embryo was established 25&#x02013;27 h following oocyte fertilization and early embryo cleavage was assessed (<xref rid="b14-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>). The early paternal effect of the sperm is demonstrated prior to the main activation of embryonic genome expression, as it starts between the fourth and the eighth cell stage of embryo preimplantation development (<xref rid="b3-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>,<xref rid="b4-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>). Embryos of the highest quality were transferred within 72&#x02013;96 h from the sampling of oocytes using a Wallace catheter (1816N; H.G. Wallace Ltd., London, UK). Parameters evaluated in the embryos included the number and regularity of blastomeres, as well as the incidence or absence of fragments and vacuoles (<xref rid="b15-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>). The mean number of transferred embryos was two per transfer. The luteal phase was supported by progesterone in the form of Utrogestan (Besins Manufacturing Belgium S.A., Drogenbos, Belgium) 2&#x000D7; 200 mg daily or by injecting Agolutin (Biotika a.s., Slovensk&#x000E1; L&#x00313;up&#x0010D;a, Slovakia) 50 mg daily and 1,500 IU Pregnyl (N.V.Organon, Oss, The Netherlands on days 1, 4, 7 and 9 following embryo-transfer. In the case of positive chemical gravidity, HCG was detected on day 14 following embryo-transfer. Clinical gravidity was defined as an intrauterine identification of the gestational sac with a heart function. Abortion was defined as gravidity terminated prior to week 20 of pregnancy.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Comparisons were made between pregnancy and reproduction rates. The normality of data was tested by the Anderson-Darling normality test and by visual inspection of histograms. As specific parameters exhibited a non-normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continual data. Fisher&#x02019;s exact test was applied to compare categorical data. P&lt;0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Oocytes injected in the MII phase totaled 2,811 and subsequent fertilization (2PN) was recorded in 2,303 oocytes (82&#x00025;). Transfer was implemented in all 174 couples and the total number of transferred embryos amounted to 349 with an average count of two embryos per transfer. Clinical gravidity per transfer was achieved in 92 cases (53&#x00025;). The resulting number of births was 83 (48&#x00025;) with 108 live-born infants.</p>
<p><xref rid="tI-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table">Table I</xref> summarizes the characteristics of the patients. <xref rid="tII-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table">Table II</xref> summarizes characteristics and outcomes of the patients and is divided into groups of males with mildly and heavily impaired sperm morphology. Statistical evaluations were performed of the age of male patients, mean count of oocytes sampled from their female partners, number of oocytes in the MII phase suitable for fertilization, number of fertilized oocytes, number of clinical gravidities and number of deliveries of live-born children. <xref rid="tII-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table">Table II</xref> indicates that while the number of fertilized oocytes in the patients with heavily impaired sperm morphology was significantly lower (P&#x0003D;0.038), neither gravidity nor delivery of the partners differed compared with those in the patients with mildly impaired or normal spermatozoa. Trends opposite to that for fertilization were recorded for gravidity &#x0005B;odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95&#x00025; confidence interval (CI), 0.29&#x02013;1.30&#x0005D; and delivery (OR, 0.55; 95&#x00025; CI, 0.26&#x02013;1.24). These results indicate that the lower number of fertilized oocytes was not associated with the overall result.</p>
<p>The present study indicates that there was a significant difference in fertilization rates between the group of males with heavily impaired sperm morphology and those with mildly impaired sperm morphology. The result of a successful treatment was pregnancy and the birth of a healthy child. Statistical evaluation showed no significant difference between the two groups in this respect (<xref rid="f1-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The prospects of producing biological offspring, in couples who previously had no likelihood of doing so, have considerably increased since the ICSI method was introduced in 1992 (first gravidity and delivery of a child following ICSI applied in a female). Following the first successful pregnancy and birth of a healthy child using the ICSI method, the procedure began to be widely used to assist fertilization, particularly in couples affected by male infertility (<xref rid="b6-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>). Gradual improvement of procedures in the evaluation of spermatozoa and micromanipulation techniques has opened new horizons for the successful assistance of reproduction in cases of male infertility. Compared with the conventional method of IVF, ICSI yields higher fertilization rates, as well as higher counts of cleaved embryos (<xref rid="b16-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>). One of the main differences between conventional IVF and the ICSI method is the ability to select just one sperm and insert it mechanically into the egg cytoplasm (<xref rid="b17-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>). Studies by Aytoz <italic>et al</italic> and Palermo <italic>et al</italic> found no significant difference between the pregnancy rates for normal and abnormal ejaculates using the ICSI method (<xref rid="b18-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>,<xref rid="b19-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>), consistent with the results of the present study. The method of selecting a suitable sperm markedly increased the count of fertilized oocytes in IVF/ICSI treatment and provided a general solution for the problem of heavy teratospermia in males who had no likelihood of achieving a successful treatment result. Therefore, the requirements for sperm donors have been markedly reduced.</p>
<p>The correlation between morphology and the low success of conventional IVF treatment has been clearly ascertained (<xref rid="b20-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>,<xref rid="b21-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>). The normal morphology of sperm is important for binding and penetration through the zona pellucida. Injection of one sperm through the zona pellucida and oolemma into the egg cytoplasm facilitates penetration of the egg, even for sperm previously incapable of overcoming these barriers during normal IVF fertilization. A range of studies have indicated that when using the ICSI method, the high percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm in the ejaculate has no essential effect on the outcome of fertilization, transfer of high-quality embryos and gravidity (<xref rid="b10-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>,<xref rid="b22-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">22</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="b25-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">25</xref>). A study by De Vos showed a lower fertilization rate of oocytes for patients with abnormal spermatozoa but a comparable quality of embryos. Lower implantation and clinical gravidity rates for abnormal sperm were also observed (<xref rid="b26-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>). The present study using ICSI observed that lower fertilization rates were obtained in males with heavy teratospermia; however, this did not affect subsequent implantation, clinical gravidity and delivery of a healthy child. Fishel <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b27-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>) conducted a study to compare IVF and ICSI methods using partner sperm and at the same time using donor sperm for IVF in couples with unexplained infertility. The highest fertilization incidence was observed in ICSI with the partner sperm. The conclusion of the study was that ICSI is an effective method of achieving fertilization in higher counts of oocytes, maximizing the number of embryos and minimizing the risk of fertilization failure in the treatment of infertility.</p>
<p>The results of the present study indicate that fertilization of oocytes is less effective in patients with poor morphological quality of sperm cells, compared with the effectiveness in patients with mildly impaired morphology. However, pregnancy and reproduction rates were independent of sperm morphology when ICSI was used. These results are in concordance with previously published studies. Microscopic selection of a sperm with &#x02018;normal&#x02019; morphology during the ICSI procedure achieves excellent results, even in heavy teratospermias (<xref rid="b28-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">28</xref>). Following introduction of the ICSI method, 2,000 children conceived using this method have been born; these individuals have not exhibited a higher incidence of malformations compared with those in children born following conventional IVF or in the normal population (<xref rid="b29-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">29</xref>). However, this conclusion does not correspond with later results published by Hansen <italic>et al</italic> and Bonduelle <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b30-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>,<xref rid="b31-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>) or with a subsequent study by Davies <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b32-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). Hansen <italic>et al</italic> observed that the incidence of inborn developmental defects diagnosed in the first year of life in children conceived with ICSI was double that in children conceived naturally (<xref rid="b30-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>). Factors that may increase the risk include the relatively high age of infertile couples, causes of infertility and the effect of drugs used to induce ovulation or to maintain gravidity in the initial stages of embryonic development, as well as factors connected with methods of assisted reproduction, freezing and unfreezing of embryos, late fertilization of oocytes and polyspermy. In the aforementioned study, a higher incidence of cardiovascular, urogenital, chromosomal and musculoskeletal defects was recorded when the ICSI method was used in assisted reproduction. Following the adjustment for parental risk factors, the incidence of developmental defects was not significantly higher in IVF, while the risk of ICSI-associated defects remained significantly higher following adjustment. An analysis of perinatal results from singleton pregnancies identified significant differences in the gestation age, birth weight, body length, head circumference and Apgar score in children conceived using ICSI when compared those in children born following spontaneous pregnancies (<xref rid="b33-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">33</xref>). The international study by Bonduelle <italic>et al</italic> focused on children born following ICSI and their subsequent 5-year development (<xref rid="b31-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>). During these five years, these children showed a greater probability of requiring physiotherapy and speech therapy and showed a higher susceptibility to respiratory, dermatological or gastrointestinal infections, resulting in a higher need for various types of surgery. The extensive observational study by Davies <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b32-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>) corroborated the conclusions of the two aforementioned studies (<xref rid="b30-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>,<xref rid="b31-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">31</xref>) with regard to the increased risk of defects in newly born children conceived through assisted reproduction compared with the risk in children from spontaneous conception. The study by Davies <italic>et al</italic> is more comprehensive and includes 6,163 children conceived through assisted reproduction and evaluated until the age of five years. The increased risk of inborn IVF-associated defects is not significant following adjustment for parental risk factors, while in the ICSI method the higher risk persists. Notably, results from a comparison between fresh and frozen embryos used in IVF and ICSI cycles indicate that embryos transferred following thawing in the two methods did not show a higher incidence of developmental defects following birth than infants from natural conception. These results may be explained by the theory that embryos are unlikely to survive the demanding process of freezing and unfreezing unless they are of high quality (<xref rid="b34-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">34</xref>). The process of mechanical injection of a selected sperm into the egg cytoplasm in ICSI avoids all natural barriers of spontaneous fertilization. As shown in the study by Fishel <italic>et al</italic> (<xref rid="b27-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">27</xref>), in conventional IVF using high concentrations of donor sperm, when there is no intervention in the process of sperm penetration into the egg, the fertilization rate was significantly lower than that in the ICSI method with partner sperm, despite the partner sperm not exhibiting the high quality of the donor sperm.</p>
<p>The present study ended at the delivery of a full-term infant. Developmental defects of the fetuses were not observed, which may have been due to the low age of the females included in the study (30.5&#x000B1;2.7 years). Data concerning the subsequent development of the children are not available. Although the ICSI method is often the only option for gravidity and delivery of biological offspring, certain studies indicate that ISCI almost doubles the risk of inborn developmental defects in children (<xref rid="b30-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">30</xref>,<xref rid="b32-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">32</xref>). For males with oligoasthenoteratospermia, ICSI treatment is often the only potentially successful method of producing biological offspring. Despite infertile parents having a number of age-associated negative factors that may increase the risk of developmental defects in the fetus, medication and ICSI remain the most efficient method for males with heavy teratospermia to achieve pregnancy and the birth of a child, as shown in the present study. The development of a new technique of continual monitoring in the cultivation of embryos may provide an improved method for the selection of the embryos that are most suitable for transfer, which may subsequently decrease the incidence of fetal developmental defects (<xref rid="b35-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>).</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-etm-07-04-1000"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parinaud</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mieusset</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Vieitez</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Labal</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Richoilley</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Influence of sperm parameters on embryo quality</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><volume>60</volume><fpage>888</fpage><lpage>892</lpage><year>1993</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-etm-07-04-1000"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Braude</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Bolton</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Human gene expression first occurs between the four-and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>332</volume><fpage>459</fpage><lpage>461</lpage><year>1988</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-etm-07-04-1000"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tesarik</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Greco</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mendoza</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>19</volume><fpage>611</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-etm-07-04-1000"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tesarik</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Paternal effects on cell division in the human preimplantation embryo</article-title><source>Reprod Biomed Online</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>370</fpage><lpage>375</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-etm-07-04-1000"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen-Bacrie</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Sperm quality and selection</article-title><source>J Gynecol Obstet Bio Reprod (Paris)</source><volume>37</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>S4</fpage><lpage>S8</lpage><year>2008</year><comment>(In French)</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-etm-07-04-1000"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palermo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Joris</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Devroey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte</article-title><source>Lancet</source><volume>340</volume><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><year>1992</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-etm-07-04-1000"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagy</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Joris</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Lui</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Staessen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Smitz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wisanto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Devroey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1061</fpage><lpage>1066</lpage><year>1993</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-etm-07-04-1000"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aboulghar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mansour</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Serour</surname><given-names>GI</given-names></name><name><surname>Sattar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen</article-title><source>J Assist Reprod Genet</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>38</fpage><lpage>42</lpage><year>1996</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-etm-07-04-1000"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aboulghar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mansour</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Serour</surname><given-names>GI</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the treatment of patients with borderline semen</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>2829</fpage><lpage>2830</lpage><year>1995</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-etm-07-04-1000"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagy</surname><given-names>ZP</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Joris</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Verheyen</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tournaye</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Camus</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Derde</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Devroey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>1123</fpage><lpage>1129</lpage><year>1995</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-etm-07-04-1000"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Alikani</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Munn&#x000E9;</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Palermo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Micromanipulation in clinical managment of fertility disorders</article-title><source>Semin Reprod Endocrinol</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>151</fpage><lpage>168</lpage><year>1994</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-etm-07-04-1000"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Riedel</surname><given-names>HH</given-names></name><name><surname>H&#x000FC;bner</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ensslen</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bieniek</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name><name><surname>Grillo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Minimal andrological requirements for in-vitro fertilization</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>4</volume><issue>8 Suppl</issue><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><year>1989</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-etm-07-04-1000"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Enginsu</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Dumoulin</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Pieters</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Evers</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Geraedts</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Predictive value of morphologically normal sperm concentration in the medium for in-vitro fertilization</article-title><source>Int J Androl</source><volume>16</volume><fpage>113</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><year>1993</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-etm-07-04-1000"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petersen</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Mauri</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Baruffi</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Franco J&#x000FA;nior</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Embryo selection by the first cleavage parameter between 25 and 27 hours after ICSI</article-title><source>J Assist Reprod Genet</source><volume>18</volume><fpage>209</fpage><lpage>212</lpage><year>2001</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-etm-07-04-1000"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardner</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Lane</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?</article-title><source>Hum Reprod Update</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>367</fpage><lpage>382</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-etm-07-04-1000"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lucas</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Lammers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Pfeffer</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Aknin</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Carr&#x000E9;-Pigeon</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Jafou</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Paulus</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sifer</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes: a French experience analysis for BLEFCO</article-title><source>Gynecol Obstet Fertil</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>515</fpage><lpage>520</lpage><year>2010</year><comment>(In French)</comment></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-etm-07-04-1000"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shoukir</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Chardonnens</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Campana</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Sakkas</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence?</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>1632</fpage><lpage>1637</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-etm-07-04-1000"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aytoz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Camus</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tournaye</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonduelle</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Devroey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Outcome of pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the effect of sperm origin and quality on this outcome</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><volume>70</volume><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>505</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-etm-07-04-1000"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palermo</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlegel</surname><given-names>PN</given-names></name><name><surname>Hariprashad</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Erg&#x000FC;n</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Mielnik</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaninovic</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Veeck</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenwaks</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>741</fpage><lpage>748</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-etm-07-04-1000"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coetzee</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kruge</surname><given-names>TF</given-names></name><name><surname>Lombard</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review</article-title><source>Hum Reprod Update</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>82</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-etm-07-04-1000"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duran</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name><name><surname>G&#x000FC;rgan</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>G&#x000FC;nalp</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Enginsu</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Yarali</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayhan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A logistic regression model including DNA status and morphology of spermatozoa for prediction of fertilization in vitro</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>13</volume><fpage>1235</fpage><lpage>1239</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-etm-07-04-1000"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mansour</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Aboulghar</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Serour</surname><given-names>GI</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>YM</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramzi</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The effect of sperm parameters on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>982</fpage><lpage>986</lpage><year>1995</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-etm-07-04-1000"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x000FC;pker</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulze</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Diedrich</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Ultrastructure of gametes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the significance of sperm morphology</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>13</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>99</fpage><lpage>106</lpage><year>1998</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-etm-07-04-1000"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lundin</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x000F6;derlund</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamberger</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplazmic sperm injection programme</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>2676</fpage><lpage>2681</lpage><year>1997</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-etm-07-04-1000"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Svalander</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Jakobsson</surname><given-names>AH</given-names></name><name><surname>Forsberg</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bengtsson</surname><given-names>AC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wikland</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is unrelated to &#x02018;strict criteria&#x02019; sperm morphology</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1019</fpage><lpage>1022</lpage><year>1996</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-etm-07-04-1000"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Vos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>15</volume><issue>Suppl 4</issue><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-etm-07-04-1000"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fishel</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Aslam</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Lisi</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Rinaldi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Timson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobetz</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Green</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Lisi</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1278</fpage><lpage>1283</lpage><year>2000</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-etm-07-04-1000"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>French</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabanegh</surname><given-names>ES</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Goldfarb</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Desai</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Does severe teratozoospermia affect blastocyst formation, live birth rate, and other clinical outcome parameters in ICSI cycles?</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>1097</fpage><lpage>1103</lpage><year>2010</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-etm-07-04-1000"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonduelle</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Camus</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>De Vos</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Staessen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Tournaye</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Assche</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Verheyen</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Devroey</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Liebaers</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>14</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><fpage>243</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><year>1999</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-etm-07-04-1000"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurinczuk</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bower</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Webb</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization</article-title><source>New Engl J Med</source><volume>346</volume><fpage>725</fpage><lpage>730</lpage><year>2002</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-etm-07-04-1000"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonduelle</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wennerholm</surname><given-names>UB</given-names></name><name><surname>Loft</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarlatzis</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Henriet</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Mau</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Victorin-Cederquist</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Steirteghem</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Balaska</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Emberson</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutcliffe</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>413</fpage><lpage>419</lpage><year>2005</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-etm-07-04-1000"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>VM</given-names></name><name><surname>Willson</surname><given-names>DK</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Essen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Priest</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Haan</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects</article-title><source>New Engl J Med</source><volume>366</volume><fpage>1803</fpage><lpage>1813</lpage><year>2012</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b33-etm-07-04-1000"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katalinic</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>R&#x000F6;sch</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Ludwig</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><collab>German ICSI Follow-Up Study Group</collab><article-title>Pregnancy course and outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled, prospective cohort study</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><volume>81</volume><fpage>1604</fpage><lpage>1616</lpage><year>2004</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b34-etm-07-04-1000"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wennerholm</surname><given-names>UB</given-names></name><name><surname>S&#x000F6;derstr&#x000F6;m-Anttila</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Bergh</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Aittom&#x000E4;ki</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hazekamp</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Nygren</surname><given-names>KG</given-names></name><name><surname>Selbing</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Loft</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Children born after cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes: a systematic review of outcome data</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>2158</fpage><lpage>2172</lpage><year>2009</year></element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b35-etm-07-04-1000"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirkegaard</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Agerholm</surname><given-names>IE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingerslev</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment</article-title><source>Hum Reprod</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>1277</fpage><lpage>1285</lpage><year>2012</year></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back>
<floats-group>
<fig id="f1-etm-07-04-1000" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Number of fertilized oocytes in the partners of patients with heavily and mildly defective spermatozoa.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ETM-07-04-1000-g00.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="tI-etm-07-04-1000" position="float">
<label>Table I</label>
<caption>
<p>Basic characteristics of the male subjects and their partners during intervention.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Characteristics</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Male age, years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34.9&#x000B1;2.8</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Female age, years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.5&#x000B1;2.7</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Normal spermatozoa, &#x00025;</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11 (3&#x02013;21)<xref rid="tfn2-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25&#x000B1;8</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Mature oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16&#x000B1;6</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fertilized oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12 (9&#x02013;17)<xref rid="tfn2-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-etm-07-04-1000">
<p>Normal distribution values are listed as mean &#x000B1; SD.</p></fn><fn id="tfn2-etm-07-04-1000">
<label>a</label>
<p>Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="tII-etm-07-04-1000" position="float">
<label>Table II</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics and the outcome of fertilization in patients with mildly and heavily defective spermatozoa.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom">Morphology</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Heavily defective (&#x02264;1&#x00025; normal spermatozoa)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">Mildly defective (&gt;1&#x00025; normal spermatozoa)</th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom">P-value</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Age, years</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">35.3&#x000B1;3.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">34.8&#x000B1;2.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.339</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">26&#x000B1;7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24&#x000B1;8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.271</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Mature oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15&#x000B1;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16&#x000B1;6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.192</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Fertilized oocytes, n</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10 (9&#x02013;13)<xref rid="tfn4-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13 (9&#x02013;17)<xref rid="tfn4-etm-07-04-1000" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.038</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Pregnancy rates, present/absent</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">23/14</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">69/68</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.266</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delivery, present/absent</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22/15</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">61/76</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.138</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn3-etm-07-04-1000">
<p>Values with normal distribution are listed as mean &#x000B1; SD.</p></fn><fn id="tfn4-etm-07-04-1000">
<label>a</label>
<p>Non-normal distribution values are listed as median (lower quartile-upper quartile).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>
