1. Volume should be used instead of diameter for kidney stones between 10 and 20 mm to determine the type of surgery and increase success
   Ediz Vuruskan et al, 2022, Urolithiasis CrossRef
2. Prognostic factors for the safety and efficacy of retrograde laser lithotripsy: Data from a contemporary series of 155 consecutive patients with single and multiple lithiasis of the urinary tract
   Diomidis Kozyrakis et al, 2022, Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine CrossRef
3. Influence of pre-stenting on RIRS outcomes. Inferences from patients of the Global Multicentre Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcome Registry (FLEXOR)
   Chu-Ann CHAI et al, 2023, Minerva Urology and Nephrology CrossRef
4. Comparison of the Efficacy and Complications of Soft Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
   WenLong Han et al, 2022, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine CrossRef
5. Modern Methods of Treatment for Proximal Ureterolithiasis
   Владислав Ожогін, 2021, Health of Man CrossRef
6. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy results for 20-30 mm kidney stones: A matched-pair analysis
   Samet ŞENEL et al, 2023, Endouroloji Bulteni CrossRef
7. RIRS with Vacuum-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath versus MPCNL for the Treatment of 2-4 cm Renal Stone
   Dehui Lai et al, 2020, BioMed Research International CrossRef
8. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis
   Guangda Lv et al, 2022, Frontiers in Surgery CrossRef